Loading...
Hosts & Guests
Transcript
Yeah, we've been making it work, Tim's been contributing a lot, helping me find articles,
helping me find videos and sources and stuff because it's very difficult to fill three hours
a day, five days a week. But we love doing it, especially when we're both on here. We're
able to have guests of the caliber we're going to have on today. Tell them a little bit about Simon
Dixon. We've got joining us at the bottom of the next hour. So Simon is a, he's a great guy.
We had a genius. He's a genius. We had him on the show. He is a one of the original people
in Bitcoin, the people who've been pushing it. He's tried to start his own bank in England.
Yes. He's got an extensive history. He used to be on Wall Street. He knows everything about
the financial system and the, the industrial complexes that control behind the scenes. So he's
like one of those insiders where you're going to get the best information because he's in rooms
that the average person is not in. So I really love to have him on the show. I was like, hey,
we got to make sure that enough people here. Well, this is a guy that tried to make the first
new bank in England in like hundreds of years and was like was on the precipice of doing it and
they tell you how the whole system works. And he's like, okay, I'm going into crypto. I'm going
into these alternative modes of currency. And that's what he's really an expert on. Early early early
Bitcoin adopter. I believe Max Kaiser and him are mutuals as well. That person has a long time
affiliation with my father. So it's very cool. Very cool to have Simon Dixon here on the network.
We've been trying to get him on for a little while. But you know, we're new at doing this.
Things can be a little bit imperfect. But that's why we do it. We love the struggle.
Yes, we do love the struggle. But again, phenomenal guess to have on you guys are going to really
enjoy that at 9 a.m. Yeah, but let's get into the news here. We got Trump's latest tweet.
And this is clip one. I want to just go ahead and third of this because we're not trying to just
do the politics and war show. We got a lot of very information from y'all, but y'all want direct
updates. This is the first news show on InfoWords in the morning. Let's go to clip one.
How close are you getting that? Well, we have a coalition for them, but they should have been
up here a long time ago. And you know, they're affected. The amazing thing is we don't need the
hormones strength. We don't need it. We don't need it at all. We don't we have so much oil.
Our country is not affected by this. We have more. All right, let's pause. We have twice.
Okay, so he's saying, can we leave it up on the screen? We don't need it. He's saying you don't
need it. We have all the oil you need. Just buy it from us. And the number two, build up some
courage and just go take it. Go take the straight. Here's the thing. Patriots are in control.
We've heard this. We've heard that the situation is under control. Does this sound under control?
I mean, we've we've been saying that for a while. As soon as, you know, the missiles start flying
over to the middle to these Gulf states. Don't worry, guys. It's under control. Don't panic.
We know you have drones. Go get to these high rise. Don't panic. Don't worry. We'll take care of it.
Oh, South Korea, Japan. We're going to need those missile defense systems. Yeah, by the way,
we got to take into the middle least. Oh, the Gulf country is like, yes, is it for us,
brother? Is it for us? No, no, no, it's not for you. It's for us and Israel. So like our allies,
you're just like, okay, and they were like, you can buy the oil from us or you can just go take
it yourselves. I mean, taking it themselves means making a deal with Iran. That's what that
really means. That does. That's the that's the hidden message. Well, I mean, at this point,
either do that or you go to Russia, right? Because Russia's rolling in the cash. I think they made
$760 million within the last month or two just off of the loop. So I mean, I don't see how you just
say, take it without force. So you're saying commit your troops, commit your ships,
get into this conflict. If you want some oil, right? Like the Philippines right now, I think they
were like 40 days before, before all of their oil reserves. It's like a national crisis. You
know, go ahead, Philippines, go take your oil. That's all you need. Just go send some ships out
there and it's like, yeah, and this is going to destroy the rest of the world. It's already started
to do that. And just because we're insulated from that here, doesn't mean it's not going to affect
us down the road. And here's the thing. A lot of people love America. A lot of people really
still love America around the world. We're trying our damnedest to remove that. And that really sucks.
It is. And it's that like playing both sides things where like people are like, well, we trust you,
but then you like stab us in the back. Right. And that's the thing that the rest of the world is
not going to cooperate with. And again, we're pushing most of our allies closer to our enemies
doing these types of things. And we all know, you know, talk is cheap. Like people want to see
actions and not just in America, but across the world. That's really what they want to say.
No more looking into it. Like you looked into it enough. We got a war. Okay. So like it's time
to go get on your bike. Well, you know, it's bad when the Pope starts speaking up to because I've
never seen him say anything for these other conflicts. The Pope said, we don't have this article.
Maybe we can pull it up, but it's not super important. The Pope said that the prayers of those who
like commit wars or start wars go on an answer because they have blood on their hands.
And he's American. Right. So I mean, it doesn't get any better than that folks. Like I mean,
if an American Pope is going out there, the Pope is a sad loser. That's what you get.
Right. But seriously, let's go ahead and get into clip two. And this is what's going on in
Israel right now. This is just a brief little story. They've passed the death penalty if you are a
Palestinian convicted of killing in Israeli, they'll automatically kill you. So let's watch
them. Let's see how they celebrate this.
They're saying they've got thousands of people already basically lined up that they are going to
execute now that this has been passed. And if here's the thing, you know, you're in a public
relations image battle. Why would you do something like this? Why would you now explain the
scenario for for me and maybe some other people like, so what is this end up doing? Like they're
celebrating. It's an it's an ethnicity specific law. So it would be like, okay, so like if a white
man kills a white man trial jail, whatever, if a black man kills a white man, black man gets killed,
you see it on sand. That's that's the type of fun, you know, secular liberal law that we have here.
That makes sense to you. Yeah. It's pretty dark, right? It is pretty dark. But you know, you
just see it. These people don't care. They're detached from reality. Yeah. So I mean, for them,
if it doesn't affect them, they're like, well, who cares? Right. And it's also like we talk to
our guests that we had on Nate Collins, also the ultra orthodox faction that all these people
represent. And they also they don't have to serve in the military. Yeah. They get kickbacks.
It's all of it. And it's just it's really truly a sickening faction. Yeah, we had an Israeli
citizen on our show probably a couple of weeks ago. And he kind of runs us through kind of how
Israel's structured. And it really is like Drex is talking. There's a ruling class. There's a
ruling class. And the ruling class is like these ultra orthodox like super conservative religious
sects and super rich, but they broke. Yeah. They're able to go or they don't have to pay taxes.
They get what stipends or something like that. Pretty much the rest of the
ban handle they beg for money. That's literally what he said. It would be like if all the people,
homeless people in America were to be like the ruling class is how he this isn't my words.
This is how he equated it to where they're going around begging and they're supposed to be
superior to the average person who's worked. And we just take a look at that and people around
the world are going to reject that and hate that. That's why we played that clip. Let's go ahead
and go to clip three. And I wanted to have a robust discussion with you on this. Let's talk about
it for the next 15 minutes or so. So we've got these robot security droids, these like spider
dogs. And apparently it's like half the cost to employ them versus a traditional security company.
Your homeless person in Atlanta, you get rolled up on by one of these.
And dude, that's straight out of black mirror. Yeah, it's robots waving at you.
A lot terrifying, bro. I hate this so much. Wow. That's capitalism now.
Coming to a city near you. Seriously, hold citizen, hold citizen. Did you pay walking fee
citizen? Like you'll you have to pay your carbon credit. Wait till they strap a gun on it.
That's that. Yeah. Absolutely. That's when it becomes really scary. Yeah. And you're going to
you're going to see that. I mean, we're going to see like this is a whole new era of like
unprecedented stuff because this technology, yeah, we watched the Boston Dynamics robot like 15
years ago or whatever. This is now mass produced, mass accessible. They're going to be trying to
put this in all sorts of various applications. What do you think about that? Yeah, they are.
Okay. So as an engineer, as an engineer, I look at this two ways because I'm also
in media, but I'm also behind the scenes in technology and I'm seeing advancements and things
where it is useful for the applications. So it's very hard for me to look at these situations
and paint it all black, right? There is a part of me that is afraid of, you know, not they're
not being checks and balances to some of this stuff. Okay. To where it's like, how do you determine
what's right from wrong and the AI has to determine that now that's based off of human input.
But the part that I see specifically that is actually useful for the average person is when we
talk about specific like repetitive motion stuff. And this is just technology that goes in like
manufacturing. Now, you and I disagree sometimes on this about AI replacing jobs, those types of
things. You can give your standpoint on that real quick before I kind of continue. Yeah, sure.
I mean, it's just a building a grid where eventually they're not going to need as many people and
then kind of everything we see as a consequence of that these resource wars, these deep
population efforts like mass migration everywhere. It's really an effort to collapse human
society because they want 500 million people and they want some sort of technological grid
that they run. Now, I think technology is great. And if it's true power to the people,
human supremacist view where everyone gets access to it equally, I think that would be awesome,
but you look at these people talk about it and they're like, yeah, like we want intelligence to be
sold basically on a meter like like electricity or water or something like that. And what that means
is there's going to be someone with a million times the ability that you have. Okay,
so yeah, and let me let me so let me clarify something. So technology is only good depending on
how it's implemented and who's behind the implementation itself. Like a knife doesn't kill
anybody. The person with the knife kills right. So you get to a scenario where I see they're being
a light at the end of the tunnel. Here's the thing about manufacturing and some of the things like
there have been a lot of job replacements across America, specifically in manufacturing.
Right. And the thing is is when you look at a piece of technology, it takes away some of the
ergonomics and the pain that happens when an operator has to do a task, a repetitive task specifically.
So just a key example, not to interrupt you. You talked to me on the gray area of the show we do
Thursday and Sunday at 730 to 1030 PM. You talked to me on the gray area about working at a
specific job. I won't say exactly what it is, but this bag gets past in front of this very bright
light. Yeah, okay, go into that. So that's a lot of it. Let me clarify because not not all jobs
are good jobs for humans. There are certain things that like you would want a robot or something to
take over that because it's actually doing harm to that person. So what he's talking about,
there are bags and those bags, you have to screen them to make sure there's nothing inside of
this particular matter inside of this bag. And there's a super bright white light. And there's
bags moving across. And imagine sitting in that chair for eight hours of shift. You get like 30 minutes
and you're sitting there staring at this bright light and you can't take your face off of looking
at that. Otherwise, you're going to be in trouble. And that bag is, it's not just one bag. There's
thousands of bags moving across your screen. Now you have vision systems that we're trying to
implement to replace that person so that they can go do something else instead of having to
sit there and be miserable. And that sounds great. That sounds great. Where the problem is,
and this is where I agree with you, is what do we do when you get to a point where there's not
enough jobs and there's more robots that have taken over those positions? Because that can happen
in a scenario. Our problem is is we haven't come up with systems where we encourage humans to go
do the things that they're supposed to do or some type of UBI, which again, everyone's going to
call me socialist, but like we've got enough resources to be able to help people out. Humans were
never designed to be sitting in a four by four square moving pieces over and over and over again
repetitive motion. That's where the robot is supposed to step in. I don't want AI to take over
people's creativity. We've got to give people an ability to even do something else. And that's
also the problem here, right? Yeah, you know, I would agree it's a real double-edged sword type
of scenario. And the thing is, it's going to take them 40 to 50 years to have a robot that can
crawl under your house and do your plumbing. It's going to take them the same for like high tech,
like electrician work, all these things. The real job loss that we're going to see that we're
already starting to see, Tim, is the white collar. It's the white collar. It's the tech job. That's
actually the biggest sector that's being affected because robotics haven't been able to mimic human
motion quite yet. Yeah, that's the thing that the finger has like fingers have like three thousand
joints or whatever, like in the hand, like access and mobility, the access and mobility of your
100% correct about that. So what you're seeing first is the white collar jobs. Specifically,
you've got coders that are in in jeopardy. A lot of data analysis, a lot of people who are
kind of doing clerk style work. We're now the AI can do that. Yeah, that is a real risk.
And the problem is is they don't have every generation or let's say every few hundred years,
we go through a transition like this, but this one is new industrial revolution when agriculture
equipment was invented. There were a ton of farmers doing manual labor jobs. What ended up
happening is you displaced and there was a lot of pain early on to say, well, what do I do if I
don't know how to farm, where do I go right now? Right. So it took a transition period for that
person to go from doing that and go into something like manufacturing where it's still required
people. And the thing that's really crazy about the time we live in are these giant jumps like
from Bronze Age to Iron Age to Steel Age to Industrial Revolution to contemporary like space
stage where we're at today. It's just gotten shorter and shorter and shorter and shorter.
Now everything we see coming out is compounding upon itself. It's like the saying is we stand on
the shoulders of giants. That's true. Eventually, the real thing that we're all worried about with
this technology is what happens when the knife has a will of its own. What happens? The thing
decides it doesn't want to do the work of its masters anymore. No, and I totally get that
perspective and let me clarify for everybody listening. I'm not pro like let's go and replace a
bunch of people's jobs with robots. But I am being realistic because I'm in the forefront. I
see people being replaced because they shouldn't be lifting 800 pound items and you've got a robot
that's now doing that particular task. It's not really 800. I'm exaggerating. It's more like 80
pounds, but it's still the same concepts. I'm not pro that. The problem is is we are getting into a
transition to where you're going to see the jobs are being removed quicker than they can be
replaced and moved into a different skill set. That's the problem. It's really dangerous to have
much people unemployed and like getting into climbing economy already that's trying to replace
them. I want to show a clip for because here's the thing. I don't think robot should imitate
human form. I think that should be legal, but I'm not against applications like this. Let's go to
clip four. This is real. Look at that. I mean, a firefighter is dangerous. No, 100% but look
how cool this is. It is cool. I've been seeing these as well. And see with that, you get one less
person. I say, I have the smoke exposure. You can get closer to the fire to the colds without
getting burned. That's great. And I love that. This is a good application. That's as good as it can
get you and I are on agreements on this one. The problem is, is do we have a lot of faith
at the with the adults in the room, right? Right. To make the right decisions when it comes to
rolling out this technology and giving people on our alternative. At this point, I don't trust
anybody who's in these systems because they're showing how they're betraying the American people
time after time after time after time. And when you rely on them to make a good decision in a vacuum
where no one is there watching them, somehow these people are making the right. So the homeless
guy is going to do my taxes. I trust him. That's basically what we have with the government. And
when you look at our government at large, the main issue, you know, as a kid is like a as a young
libertarian, okay? When I was a little boy, a little fan of Ron Paul and all that back in the day,
okay? When I'm when I'm a young libertarian, I'm like, hey, you know, I'm losing my train of
thought here when I'm a young libertarian, I'm like, okay, there should be less regulations.
These companies should be able to do what they want. So we can have innovation and science and
technology. What I realize now is there's two little regulation on the things that matter.
And there's way too much regulation on the things that are totally irrelevant and just keep small
business. Absolutely right. And one of the areas that we have to look at specifically is AI. AI
regulation is severely behind the ball in terms of catching up with the technology.
No, no, no regulation. That's what that's the law they passed literally. Yeah. And the AI
companies have their own lobbies just like the military industrial complex. So they go in there.
They're like, well, we want less regulations. That way we can make more money.
Check it out. Right. Here's the thing about AI right now.
You know what I think should be banned completely. You shouldn't be able to take a person that
exists in real life and be able to clone that person on AI unless that person is the one doing
the action or you have specific rights to yourself. Uh oh, you mean like if you come with a logo
and you get a copyrighted, I can't steal that but I can steal your entire image. Yeah. Isn't that
isn't that good? Well, it's a new way for scammers. Look, I think everybody understands right now.
It's getting crazy scary to be able to tell the difference between what's real and what's not.
You get a phone call and it sounds like somebody talking to you. It's not. I am a robot.
You know, and this was one of those things where the technology was intended to be good.
Right. And we have bad actors that are doing things with that. Remember, maybe you didn't see these,
but it used to be on YouTube. They kind of cracked down on this. There used to be AI ads of like Joe
Rogan pitching a product on Rumble. Oh, yeah. And I was like, wait, I fell for it for some like,
wait, but that sounds weird. Now they're getting. Now they're getting. It is fraud. But now they're
getting to the point where it's so good, guys, that you're not going to be able to tell with like
11 labs or some of these other technologies where they're cloning people's voices. It's almost
like for like, yeah. And I had such a good one of my dad made on 11 labs like a year plus
ago. And it's only just gotten so much better, so much better, so much better. Yep. This is the
world we live in guys. It really is sci-fi. We're getting ushered into that age.
There's no running from it. And the last thing I'll say on this is these AI models,
they are trained to basically continue to evolve themselves at the same time with less and less
human input. Right. So again, it's like that exponential curve and the compounding effect as
the AI gets smarter. It knows how to fix its gaps. And the human doesn't have to step in.
I mean, it's eventually going to get to AGI. We'll see how that happens. We say we're not that far,
but we might be closer than we think. It's very human impulse to think of everything as linear
and as like following like a constant gradient. But in reality, everything that we're talking about
here is exponential, just like with the time development of the technology, the rapid advancements
we've seen over the last century, over the last decade, really. But we have to speak about these
things and people in positions of power, especially Congress, need to step up to the plate and do
the job that we ask them to do and protect us along the way. Technology when it's guided in the
right way and it's got the right barriers, the right protections can be a net positive for society
or it can be a net negative when we have people who are corrupt just wanting to grab a bag
and screw over the American person. That's the problem. And that's our, that's the systemic problem
that is. Rest on this show, that's what we see in every sector and we rail against it.
And it's our job to get involved in the political process, especially after Trump being gone,
it's going to be a whole new world. So if you're passionate about A.I. regulation,
a digital bill of rights going forward and having an actual future for humanity where we utilize
these things instead of being used by them, where are the people you want to see? Rex Jones,
10 Dawkins. Yeah, man. And anybody who's dealing with any job lost due to AIS, we deeply sincerely
feel free. We're sorry about that. I've had a lot of friends, a lot of people that have been
dealing with this. You know, so let's go ahead and read this article. Yeah, sure. In the killing
of Charlie Kirk, defense lawyers for Tyler Robinson claimed the bullet did not match the alleged
rifle. They cite DNA complexities as well and incomplete forensic data while seeking delay,
raising doubts over key prosecution evidence in a new for a new court filing on Tuesday, March 31st,
defense attorneys for Tyler Robinson, the accused who allegedly killed conservative
influencer Charlie Kirk have claimed that the Bureau of the ATF was unable to match the bullet
recovered during the autopsy to the rifle allegedly used by Robinson, stating that the recovered
weapon was a Mauser Model 98 30 yacht six caliber rifle. The defense lawyer stated that the ATF
analyst could not conclusively identify the bullet fragment, so they didn't even have it.
So the guy gets shot. There's no exit wound on camera. Blood doesn't spray out the back of
his body. Lord forbid, God have mercy. Like it's just so horrible. We have talked about this
so callously, but we're talking about a criminal case that's captivated the nation, a very prominent
political assassination at the end of the day here. Yeah, and here's the thing. I think everybody
knew there was something fishy going on behind the scenes, all the evidence, all the things,
and my issue was specifically all types of narratives were coming out. You had deliberate,
deliberate misinformation, misinformation, you know, and you know, I used to like old
Candace, but the new Candace was doing things like Fort Wachuka Waka Haka. Fort Haka, yeah,
and it's like she's talking about like secret meetings and, you know, maybe somebody popped out
of a suit title like Ninja Turtle or Super Mario exploded and there's like a bomb in the lapel
mic and stuff. And you told me when I was like, no, no, no, I'm going to watch all of Candace's
episodes for this month so that I can know that I can say confidently that I know it's BS because
people when I came out against the narrative on Twitter, but we did really people were like,
you don't need to know what she's saying before you criticize. And I was like, well, okay,
I listened to it. Mitch Snow is this guy who's involved in like border military operations. Like
30 years ago, he supposedly claims that he uncovered evidence that the military was working with
the cartel, specifically a photo of some sort of military leader with a cartel member on some
sort of tunnel around the border. He makes this claim that this hurt his military service somehow.
He comes back like 30 years later to the day, to the base and 12 kernels and Erica Kirk and
everyone's there. And my ex-wife had eyes like those I've never put those eyes. And it's just like,
like we're not in a quentin 13th movie. Okay, like I'm sorry.
Well, and the biggest problem is if you got people with big enough platforms coming out with stories,
it takes away from the main narrative and the real stuff that's going on.
Because we do question it in question. And that's the thing is like we don't buy the official
narrative. We have the article right here. The official narrative is a lie, right? But that
doesn't mean we believe in the Ninja Turtle. Yes. And then here's the thing. It doesn't take
rocket science to see like things were not adding up. And specifically around the text messages.
If you guys, yes, if you guys recall and let we'll get these in order too specifically,
because Rex and I are going to read this out for you. You talk a little bit. I'll get it done.
Basically, there were text messages that apparently came out between Tyler Robinson and his roommate.
Now apparently they had this lovers, a quarrel. I think his roommate was transgender if I'm
not mistaken. No, maybe a furry or something. And there were these text messages that came out.
Now we're going to read some of these text messages. And we're going to see what you guys
think about them because we're like, there's no way that this was a real exchange and we had
some boomers. I think it starts here first with the September 10th. Yeah. And then we got the
second one under we got delete this exchange. We got don't talk to the media please and then a
bit over a week. We'll just read it like that. And it doesn't really matter if it gets a little
jumbled. Well, so let's start here with drop. Yeah, for sure. So this is supposedly the conversation
between the assassin and his lover. Okay. And this reads like it's scripted like it's written by
like a middle-aged man pretending to be AI, some sort of Intel officer at the FBI or CIA, whatever
it is. Drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard. What? You're joking, right?
I'm still a little came I love, but I'm stuck in Orm for a little while longer yet. Shouldn't
be long until I can come home, but I got to grab my rifle still. To be honest, I'd hope to keep
the secret till I die of old age. You're killing Charlie. Oh, it's going to be a secret until I die
of old age that I climbed on a roof and I killed the most prominent person in conservative media.
I just thought like this, this can't be real and also 20 year olds don't talk like this.
No, no, no, it's okay. Where's the Riz? Where's the note cap? I slimed him out.
I slimed him out would be a good one. They they they they missed that one. Yeah. All right,
let's keep reading. Yeah, you weren't the one who killed it. Who who did it, right?
I'm sorry. I thought they caught the person. Just let's read off. Yeah. Okay. Yeah, thank you.
No, they grabbed some crazy old dude that interrogated someone in similar clothing.
I had planned to grab my rifle from the drop point. Oh, the drop point of all these military
times shortly after. But most of the side of town, it got locked down. It's quiet almost
enough to get out, but there's one vehicle lingering. Why? Why did I do it? Yeah. I had enough of his
hatred. Come on, man. Come on, bro. I had enough of his hatred. Some hatred. I just it's
totally fake. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen,
I would have left no evidence going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully they have moved on.
I haven't seen anything about them finding it. Okay, so hold on. He does the act. Then he puts
his rifle in the bushes. Then he's coming back to get his rifle later. Why wouldn't you just leave?
That's what I'm saying. And not even just that, right? Everybody who's watched like, you know,
any crime TV show knows you don't leave a clear trail for law enforcement to be able to
fight. I was here at this time. I'm hiding further from the cops. Go ahead, sir. I did this.
This was the weapon. This was the bullet I use. This is my area code of where I live. I am the
person who did it. That's pretty much what this is why I did it. This is my premeditated motivation
for doing it. Well, and so like again, we can clearly definitively say when we saw these text
messages, Rex and I as well as the rest of you guys were like, there's no way this story is true.
And it's just beautiful, beautiful to see that they're still following through on this because
I thought they were going to let this one go just like Trump's assassination attempt.
Well, they're trying to, but ultimately, I mean, it just shows how massive Charlie Kirk was,
and it is an influence just on the world in America in general. You can't really make this
die just because there's so many hours of Charlie on tape recently talking about everything
that's going on in the world right now. And the reason why people call all this into question
is because Charlie was very passionately anti-war incredibly pro-Israel as well, but very
passionately anti-war. And he made a lot of statements talking about the October 7th standdown,
like we've talked about the Israeli citizen interview we did earlier, like we've heard about
that from other people, like they're mad about that as well. And he had all these legitimate
questions. Oh, he doesn't get to ask questions anymore. And he was speaking about out against
Iran. He was speaking about foreign entanglement. And here's the thing, they knew Charlie was a threat.
He galvanized the youth and just look at TPUSA, right? Right. The amount of offices that they had
across the United States and the colleges that they were going to, that is a ton of influence.
And when you can influence a young generation into a narrative which we support of the no new
wars, the conflicts, those types of things, they see you as a threat. The industrial complex sees
you as a threat for those things. Yeah, no, absolutely. And what you have with TPUSA is you have,
I think they have a thousand campaign offices and many thousands, perhaps tens of thousands
of affiliated volunteers or employees. You have a ready-made political campaigning system that
is targeted towards young people that young people accept and love and view as legitimate.
So you take the brain out of that and you do a brain transplant into it. That's pretty much
the ideal scenario. So you can't look at the Charlie Kirk thing and go, well, there's absolutely
no motive to take him out besides someone that's mad about him not liking trans people.
Yes, there's tons of reasons why you would do so. And then remember before, I guess the night
before he was assassinated, there were meetings that were going on. He was getting angry.
You can correct me in from earlier on, earlier on, but it wasn't okay.
A couple months before, there were other stuff happening in motion constantly and motion
constantly. So you're right also. And there were people that were unhappy with what he was doing
specifically and what he was speaking out against. Now, we don't know exactly who's behind this.
I'm seeing people say, well, it could have been these rallies. It could have been some people
who could have been easily private corporate interest as well. I mean, how many shows do we watch?
I think it was like yellowstone or something or like be meeting the big tower.
We're going to take the billion out of company over. But that's, that is real, right? But it
doesn't happen at like a military base with 12 kernels in the wife and they plot the assassination
attempt. These decisions are made quietly. Yeah. But one thing that I can't get behind and I've
seen the scenario to come out so much is that Erica Kirk is behind the assassination attempt.
Like come on. Like that, that one kind of rubbed me the wrong way because I'm like, she's married
to this man has two kids and you can see their life prior to this. They were happily married.
You could see them in love. Sure. I mean, people criticize her. She's acting a little weird. I say
she's a widow. I'm not really going to try to attack that ship. I don't think it's worth it.
You can just criticize things based on facts and evidence alone, right? And there's more than
enough of that here. Here's the thing. You have people doing the Charlie Kirk show right now.
The Charlie Kirk show with the same name talking about the Iran war and like a neutral deposit of
context. Well, and what are you going to do? You're going to let his name die. You're going to let
the whole operation die. Change the show. Change the name. If my dad died, it's not the Alex Jones show.
Yeah. Well, here's what I'm thinking, right? Like I understand like some people like, well,
she's grifting off of her husband's death and X, Y and Z here's the house to feed as well.
That's what I was literally about to say. You can't criticize. She's got to be able to find a way
to make money for her family because that was what Charlie was doing and she needs to step into
the place as the head of the house now. Yeah. So it's not like she's just going to go back and
and do a nine to five guys like she's got to find a new way. So of course, you know, she's having
conversations and there's ways that they're going to do in order to continue and they have a ton of
people on payroll, by the way. You got Druski up there. Oh, the Druski. What did you think about that?
By the way, we haven't talked about that. So when he when he did the NASCAR thing, I genuinely
didn't recognize him. I thought he was just like a fat white person with the beard. This is highly
offensive, but hey, you know what? I've said that Kanye doing the Hitler thing is art. I can't
call that not art as well. Yeah. I mean, the joke was funny, but I mean, again, it's who you
pay. I'm a free speech absolutist. I can't be a hypocrite. If you're mad at me right now for saying
that, like I just I can't hold two positions that are contrary to each other. Like I endorse
Alex Stein crashing out. I have to endorse Druski crashing out. Those are the rules. And here's the
thing. As a black person, a lot of black people are not going to appreciate me saying this. But
again, I have to be ideologically consistent. Now, I'm not saying people need to go out and
start doing this, but because he is doing light face, it does bring a case where like is black
face? Okay. Like we can't just say one side is here's the thing. I'll give a little bit of
a little argument. I would say because of the history. Yeah. That goes along with the black
face. That makes it. It does. It does make a little bit different. And an all I'm just trying to
tell you is like within a vacuum, I don't support. Why would I support this? I don't support people
going on and doing black face. It is highly effective. But we do support free speech.
Yes. Yes. And here's the thing. We can look at someone doing this and say this is disgusting
whatever. But at the end of the day, it's a part of our society. And in a society where you can do
that, it's a lot better than a cop showing up to your house with a gun because of, you know,
what you did on social media. Yes. So I, I, I, I'm not participating in it, but I do endorse it
as freedom. But we look, we look at the whole thing and just getting back to Eric
or Kirk in general. You have someone like her and they essentially plug her in because she's
the wife of Charlie Kirk. She's the only one that feasibly could have the street cred to run
the operation and keep it as it is. But she's not running anything like she's controlled.
Like there's, there's tons of people. There's tons of money. There's things that keep the operation
afloat. There's everything that we don't see, right? So it's hard to make a value judgment
based off of that. I want to go to the clip number five because you, you've talked to me a lot
about the space age weaponry and stuff like that. Have you heard about the discombobulator?
No, discombobulated. Now we're getting so like fantasy. So there, there were rumors that we use
the so-called discombobulator on the Venezuelans. They're like special forces came in,
there was a report. It looked like it had been written by the CIA, but they couldn't find a better
name. I like it. It has a lot of words. Discombobulator. Yeah. But let's go ahead and roll the clip.
What have you heard about the discombobulator? Because I hadn't heard anything
than that much detail since Alprin said it made everybody yak.
You know, there's a lot of directed energy weapons that we've had for a while and we've tested
them. There's some that can make you feel heat. You know, there's sound waves that can make
you just freak out and discombobulate you. What exactly they're using and what was used in
Venezuela has not been publicly announced. It's just one of those things that we have that makes
it a big advantage because when you are going into a place where the enemy knows where you're coming,
you don't want to lead with your face. You know, that's a cardinal rule of doorkicking operations.
Have something in front of you for that. So that's why you throw flashbangs in a room.
This is a directed energy flashbang to blow everybody's mind and hopefully get our guys in
and safely back out. Yeah, I learned that in boxing. They couldn't, I'm saying like they couldn't
find a better name than discombobulator. Well, I like that Fox News is just like it's you're like a
boomer and like Galveston, Texas and you turn on the TV and it's just Jesse Waters and this guy
talking about discombobulators. It's just like explosion footage was throwing strike footage
over and over and over again. You're like, oh, that's a big one. That's a good one. They love
their war footage. That's what they do for the Fox News Fox News, man. It's it's become a parody
of itself. Well, and just what a time to be alive that we have discombobulators and only farms
and just all types of new stuff. And I'm like, how do I take these things serious anymore?
Like, so the whole point of that technology, it's basically like almost like a flashbang is
the way that like you ever heard like Havana syndrome. No, we're like it's like this pseudo thing,
but apparently it may be real where like you get like waves and at you and it like makes you sick,
the lyrics. Okay, I start like that. So yeah, like I read about these weapons like 20 years ago
in books that guests would give me here on the show and they've had things like this forever.
A lot of these things that go have like a big panel on a truck and then they direct the panel
at the crowd of people, a lot of crowd control. There's like minor and major versions of
different frequencies that you can use. Sounds pretty fun, right? Do you think we just like
the people creating weapons that like Lockheed and Raytheon are just like watching movies and they're
like, that's a good idea. I have an idea. I mean, that's probably how it works, right? Like as an
engineer, you see a system like, yeah, maybe there's a good concept there and maybe we could engineer
something like that similar to happen. I mean, I think back to G.I. Joe, I've always thought that
this was terrifying, but a really cool idea of the rods from God, the tungsten rods, right? You
can drop in from space and do the kinetic damage without having to fall out of a nuclear weapon.
Wow, I bet you they come out with something like that. Oh, I think we already have stuff like
that up there in orbit. It's pretty terrifying to think about. Let's talk about who I'm seeing.
Massie on life to say, yes, let's talk about that. Life is a clip.
One of the things in the Farm Bill, still trying to get out of it, was successful in getting this
out of prior bills is immunity for a German company called Bayer that makes glyphosate.
This is not to grant farmers immunity. This is to grant the corporation immunity. If they give
farmers, if farmers contract a form of cancer or non-hodged insulin phoma from this chemical,
if this makes it into the Farm Bill, it won't be able, you won't be able to sue for that.
And I know they're dealing with some similar legislation at the state level.
You know, I learned a lot about this from you because I had no idea that this was an issue.
And maybe you can just recap like why glyphosate is so dangerous for us.
Sure. And I'll go ahead and start doing that by giving one of the counter arguments.
People will go, it's only used on 3% of the wheat to dry it, bro. Actually, that's not true.
It's used on a third of all American fields for wheat control. We used to use about 100
million or 80 million pounds of it. We now use 280 million pounds of it a year.
It's ubiquitous in the food supply. 95 to 97% of all corn is roundup ready. That means it's
made to take the pest aside while everything else dies. Spoiler alert that gets into your body
as well. Glyphosate is so dangerous because it's an amino acid analog of the amino acid called
glycine, which is used to make all the collagen in your body. So there's been a prevalent health
theory. And this has kind of come out over time that it has a potential to replace that
positive amino acid, which is essential for you to have in your body over time, leading to
salsa and essence and eventually possibly speculating cancer. I mean, not even speculating RFK
junior went to court against Monsanto and won a $270 million lawsuit proving it caused non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma. That means it's carcinogenic. And if it's carcinogenic causes one cancer, it causes all
the other ones as well. Wow. Wow. And I'm just thinking about it because I'm seeing a lot of people
even in our age group and young 30s starting the cancer rates are spiking. And it's specifically
because of what we're putting in our bodies. Like I had a friend just last year. She's like younger
than me. And she had like cancer in her neck. I'm like, what? Like how are we getting to that point?
Now I thought, you know, RFK was supposed to come in and he was supposed to like open the
cabinet up and just start tearing out all the bad news for national security. Go ahead.
So what do you think happened because I was super excited. The reason this is one of the reasons
why I ran on Trump because he was bringing in RFK and I loved what he was saying. He was like,
we're going to get these chemicals out of your food. We're going to we're going to make sure
Americans can eat healthy. And now I see more missiles than I see traction on these types of
things. Yeah. And they tell us that oh, it's too crazy to get the life of state out. We have to
have 50 different flavors and chips at the gas station. We could never do that. We could never
subsidize a program to get the poison out of your food. Oh, another quarter trillion for the war.
It's just fine. And that's the thing. It's so crazy. It's just why wouldn't you resign at this
point, especially if you're one of these people like RFK, we're like, this is literally he fought
for a decade on this issue and look at it now.
Mm-hmm. Pretty crazy. You know what? He said we need more herbicide or herbicide.
Is that what he said to it? If you would.
Yeah, we love it. I hope this isn't true.
Liberal. Yeah, we need more herbicide production stunning as followers. I mean, yeah, I mean,
war is peace guys. You didn't hear that. You didn't get the memo. Let's go ahead and go to clip
eight. Really quick to ring out this segment because here's the thing. Okay. You know,
we've talked about the American military and maybe their limitations a little bit.
We got big problems because we got we got real elites. Okay, we got real elite shock troops
training out in North Korea. Let's go ahead and show people clip number eight.
Oh, hi, hi, hi. Hey, I wouldn't want to mess with him on the battlefield.
All right, watch this coming. Oh my god.
They're driving nails into the board. Look at that. That's some kung fu stuff right there.
Now, you know, this looks what? No way. Yeah, that's going to stop a bullet, guys.
All right, watch this.
Okay, that's real. Go back to that. We got to show that again.
This is not a joke, guys. Grenade!
Talk about jumping on the claymore for your boys. Grenade!
Okay, we're having, you know, maybe you're having a little bit of rough day.
Maybe I haven't had your coffee yet. You got a long drive ahead of you.
At least you're not in North Korean in a PR video losing your frontal cortex.
You know, a pile of bricks. Here's the thing. That's all for show. I mean, come on now.
Guys just like, wow, in front of you, you're just going to be like, you're dead.
So I don't know why they do these things. It's probably theatrics. Maybe it's just deep
in that in the culture. In the Pakistan, they have that thing on their
border where they literally they do like a dance off, where it's like a martial
display. Have you ever seen this? No, we got just a little bit of time.
The crew are absolute wizards. If you can find that and if we get close out with that,
yeah, they do it because it's a tribal thing of like, this is our border. This is our culture.
This is our border. This is our culture. FU, FU. So like, no guns is just a dance off.
They have guns, but they're not pointing them at each other. They're like, it's kind of like a
rooster battle. Like they're kind of like stepping like, it's like an intimidation thing,
but we see this all around the world. Here's the thing. The Taliban, when they take our military
equipment, they do stuff as well. ISIS has the jungle gym and all of that. We've exported our culture
to people. So now they're trying to make their own Hollywood movies as well. Yeah, they are trying
to make their own Hollywood movies now. I mean, look, North Korea is involved in Ukraine now.
They're still there, right? They're still dying. I'm not sure, but they were involved.
They were involved heavily, but we see these things, you know, look, I guess there it is.
What is going on here? And this is how they do the border dispute. This is how they kind of
uh, uh, Chris made it, I guess it'd be the kind of good name of a creature to describe it.
But yeah, we got discussion.
