045 Training a muscle 2x per week - Full Body vs Upper/Lower
About this episode
In this episode of Hypertrophy Past & Present, Jake and Chris break down an often misunderstood programming question: how does full body training twice per week compare to an upper/lower split performed four times per week? The episode begins with a deep dive into a late 1960s program from Chuck Sipes, before discussing the key differences between full body and upper/lower when frequency is equated.
Key topics include:
• Why full body twice per week is one of the most underrated training splits
• A breakdown of a classic Chuck Sipes program
• The difference between within-session fatigue vs post-workout fatigue
• Why back-to-back training days may reduce motor unit recruitment
• Why doing more volume per session can actually limit long-term progress
• The trade-off between rate of growth vs ceiling of growth
• Practical considerations (time, lifestyle, gym access) that influence split selection
Get every episode summarized
Each time Hypertrophy Past and Present publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Hypertrophy Past and Present
051 The silver era perfected drop sets 75 years ago
Hypertrophy Past and Present
050 Are circuits for hypertrophy the next big thing?
Hypertrophy Past and Present
049 The data says you need more first sets
Hypertrophy Past and Present
048 How to do more exercises in a workout without fatigue holding you back
Hypertrophy Past and Present