049: Linda Raschke on trading edges, modelling the markets, identifying market behavior, trade management and day trading techniques.

Markets are constantly changing. Trading edges come and go.

In an industry with such a low survival rate, where some areas are changing at an ever increasing rate, what does it actually take to not only survive, but thrive, over an extended period of time?

The guest on this episode, Linda Raschke, has been trading for over 35 years. She traded for several hedge funds before starting her own, ranking 17th out of 4500 hedge funds by Barclays Hedge for 'Best 5 year performance'.

She's experienced a large number of changes in the industry, some of them have been huge, but she's managed to adapt and continues trading even today.

Linda stand out from the crowd for three factors: Performance, Longevity and Consistency, so what does it actually take?

What has she learnt over the years and what can we do to improve our own chances of performance, longevity and consistency?

In our chat with Linda we discuss some of the changes she's experienced over the years and the impacts this has had on trading. We also hear about her approach to modelling the markets, understanding market behavior, trade management, day trading techniques and some fantastic questions submitted by fellow listeners. Make sure you don't miss those!

Topics discussed

• Changes in the markets over time and the impacts that has had on strategies and their performance
• How to use modelling to identify market behavior and edges
• AI, machine learning and neural network techniques
• Tips and factors to consider when daytrading
• Reading market behavior throughout the day

PLUS loads of great questions submitted by Better System Trader listeners!

 

Disclaimer:
Trading in the financial markets involves a substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. All content produced by Better System Trader is for informational or educational purposes only and does not constitute trading or investment advice. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.