
10. Political Discourse and Substantive-Methodological Intersections with Justine Zhang and Arthur Spirling
About this episode
In this episode, we talk with Justine Zhang and Arthur Spirling. Justine is currently a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford University and Arthur is a Professor of Politics and Data Science at New York University. We discuss their 2017 EMNLP paper, with Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, "Asking too much? The rhetorical role of questions in political discourse."
Justine and Arthur touch on how collaborations can provide real insight into other disciplines as well as their different paces and writing norms. We also discuss substantive validation for unsupervised learning methods, marinating in "fun" data, the responsibility of studying political institutions that touch all aspects of human life, and a call for administrators to incentivize these kinds of collaborations.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Diaries of Social Data Research publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Diaries of Social Data Research

20. Navigating the Shores of Computational Text Analysis Validity with Christian...
Diaries of Social Data Research

19. Constructing a Taxonomy of Implicit Hate Speech Grounded in Social Theory wi...
Diaries of Social Data Research

18. Gender Patterns in English-Language Fiction and Interrogating Data with Ted...
Diaries of Social Data Research

17. Hashtag Network Analysis and Interwoven Research Ethics with Ryan Gallagher...
Diaries of Social Data Research