20260331-WAR-ROOM-PODCAST

Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the war room. I'm your host Harrison Smith

coming to you live this Tuesday afternoon, the final day of March folks. We are now officially

one quarter of the way through the year 2026. So yeah, sorry, sorry to let you know about

the ever increasing speed of time passing. I don't know. Maybe I'm the only one. Yeah,

quarter of the way through the year already. And that to me is shocking. We have a lot of

news of course to cover. And I'm going to take a lot of your phone calls today. No guests.

So we will be taking your phone calls in the second half of the program. But let's begin

today as we do every day with our daily dispatch. All right, here is folks, your daily dispatch

for Tuesday, the 31st of March 2026. Double standard Democrats get mural of arena Ziruzka

removed despite liberal love of George Floyd. On Monday, social media began to trend with

the case of hypocritical liberals getting a nearly complete mural for murdered Ukrainian

refugee arena Ziruzka in Rhode Island, taken down with many commenters pointing out the

left's love of George Floyd, the nearly complete mural of slain Ukrainian refugee arena

Ziruzka in Providence is being removed after Jewish mayor Brett smiley called for it to be

taken down. The murder of the individual depicted in this mural was a devastating tragedy, but

the misguided isolating intent of those funding murals like this one across the country is divisive

and does not represent Providence said smiley. It's because she's white. I just want everybody

to know, doesn't matter if you're a refugee, doesn't matter if you're a Ukrainian, doesn't

matter if you're a liberal BLM supporter. Backed is your white, you're there for bad.

This was a mural of a black criminal. Then there'd be no problem with it. I know because

Providence, Rhode Island spent $38,000 spraying black lives matter on the street last year or

the year before. So they're not concerned about what's divisive and or not. They're concerned

about uplifting white people. So that's the central concern they have is making sure

that white people, even if they're totally innocent refugees fleeing from a war being

stabbed and murdered in cold blood for no reason by a black guy who after he murders her says,

got that white girl. It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. You're white. You're there for bad,

and your murder was a good thing. People don't want to be reminded of it as if it's bad,

paint a picture of the murderer and they'll celebrate it. Okay, they're liberals.

And of course, everyone involved is non-white. So just take that in, folks.

Meanwhile, Christian athletes come to the defense of NBA player fired for criticizing

League's Pride Month events. We'll get back into this Jade and Ivy. A former player for the NBA's

Chicago Bulls was let go by the team on Monday. After he criticized League's Pride Month

celebrations as unrighteous. According to his Christian faith, yes, folks, you can be a wife

beater. You can be a rapist. You can be a statutory rapist, pedophile. You will not be let go of

your NBA team. However, if you're Christian, you better watch out. Okay, and that's

actually what's going on here. We'll get back into that. United Nations Human Rights

Diplomat resigns, warns you in preparing for possible use of nuclear weapon against Iran,

United Nations Human Rights Diplomat Mohamed Safa resigned from his position on Sunday,

claiming the international organization may soon use a nuclear weapon in Iran. While you in

itself does not have nuclear weapons, members, such as the US or Israel who are at Warthoron

could deploy nukes against the Middle East nation. We'll get back into this. There's a couple

potential options for them using nukes. And I'll break it all down on the other side.

Meanwhile, oil slides as Trump reportedly has told AIDS, he's now willing to end the war without

reopening war, which I decide it's funny. I don't know to me. That's something about that

is funny to me, that it's gone from these overarching, very ambitious goals for the Iran War of

totally retaking the country and installing a new regime to actually, we just want to get the

straight of Hormuz open, right? As of yesterday, the goals of the war were to mitigate the consequences

of the war. And now we're not even doing that. And now it's like, actually, we just lost. We

just lost completely. We started a fight, got knocked to the ground, got our face rubbed in the

dirt, and now we're going to go home. Good job, Trump. Get it.

While I'm going on, when it comes to the war in Iran, again, it's just every 12 hours, the entire

scope of the war changes dramatically. I don't think it's ever

was intended to be anything other than what it is, a total disaster,

bagmire excuse from the New Old Order to implement it yet again, even greater and more stringent

lockdowns than they ever achieved under COVID. Remember, it's different this time. They don't

need your permission. They will just cut off the oil. And this is already being implemented

in various countries around the world with other countries, planning a massive

global lockdown, exactly like COVID. And it's so funny because I'll say something on next

yesterday about what's happened already in the Iran War and where it goes from here and just

the disastrous outcomes that are all but inevitable at this point. People are like, oh, you know,

you doomer, whatever, a black pillar, whatever. And it's like, I was thinking back and I was like,

last couple of times I've had a reticence like this. I've had like a, you know, an anxious feeling

about the future like this. I think of a couple, you know, pretty prime examples. One of them

would have been like January, February, 2020, seeing the lockdowns of COVID, seeing the way things

were going in that regard and just going, okay, this is bad. It's not going to be two weeks.

They're locking us down fully. They're going to just try to destroy the economy. They're going to

keep people imprisoned in their houses until they come out the vaccine. And all of this is probably

in service of getting Trump out of office. And of course, 2020 was like the most disasters here

in American history. Then again, in like August of 2020, when we still hadn't gotten rid of the

lockdowns and people were still going, I can't go on much longer, can it? It's been a couple

months now. It'll probably let up soon. And I again made a prediction. Then I said, actually,

I think they're going to keep it locked down until election day. I think they're going to use

mail-in ballots to cheat. I think it's going to be so obvious that they cheated that people are

going to be enraged and pissed off and angry at this. And then they're going to use that anger

of the fact they stole the election to claim that saying the election was stolen is terrorism.

And they're going to try to use all of that anger that they generate to piss off Republicans,

get us to do something stupid so they can claim we're all domestic terrorists.

And then it just happened exactly like that. So I'm not a doom or all the time. I'm not always

predicting doom. It's just there are certain times when all of the components line up

and without a dramatic and universal change, it's inevitable. The disaster that we're going into.

So again, I'm not a doom star all the time. But when I do predict doom, I tend to be right.

So just take that into account. I want to go to a couple of videos here. Like I said,

obviously the major upshot of all of this is massive lockdowns across the globe. It's

going to clip number five here. Leaked reports. They're at an energy lockdowns within 21 days in

New Zealand and Australia. They're already having sanctions or rationing going on there.

But no, they already have a pre-planned global lockdown schedule that they are now announcing

quietly. Let's watch. Australia and New Zealand could see energy lockdowns within 21 days.

This is from two leaked reports. Well, one of them was leaked. One of them was published

today by each government. Both countries' governments are now modeling. They say they're

actively modeling. This is a declaration that has been made that they are modeling the worst-case

scenarios for the country, for the economy and for citizens. And we know what they mean when

they say measures they are talking about energy lockdowns. We'll cover Australia in the first part

of the video and then we'll cover New Zealand in the second part of the video. But let me tell you

the official name of the declaration from New Zealand. This is called the Fuel Response Plan

2026 overlay and it's in response to measures that they put in place in 2024 for this worst-case

scenario. Now, when you read that report and when you actually look at some of the things they've

said, it's weird to me that they knew this was coming, have no refinery capabilities and yet they

didn't do what the IEA said, which was to have an emergency stockpile of energy fuels. If you're

from New Zealand, drop a comment below how on earth has this happened. And if you missed Wednesday's

video, it's way too long to recap all of it here. But it was about these energy lockdown scenarios

that have been published by the IEA and they've gone out to governments all around the world who are

now actively modeling and preparing for what they say are energy lockdowns. And I want to quote

from their official guidance. It says, and I quote here, these energy lockdowns would be far

more severe than anything we saw during the COVID lockdowns. That's from the International Energy

Agency who created this report, which is called Sheltering From Oil Shocks. And remember what they

have recommended in their report. They have recommended to governments around the world that lockdown

measures go into place. And again, I'm quoting directly from these reports.

So there it is, the fuel response plan 2026 in New Zealand, written in 2024, where they said,

you know, here's what's going to happen if been win. There's a disruption for the flow of oil.

Not a lot of instances that would result in the restriction of the flow of oil to places like

New Zealand, the Strait of Hormuz shutting one of the only ones. So is there looking forward

in time from 2024? It seems like they were aware in some regard of the fact that

this would be happening. And they did nothing to stock up. They did nothing to keep a reserve

because it's on purpose because this is the design. This is what they want. They wanted to stock

up and have plenty of fuel for their citizens. Then they wouldn't need to lock down. They could have

done that. They knew what was coming. They had the foresight, make the plan to ration everything.

Why didn't they make the plan to store up a bunch of fuel? Because it's on purpose, obviously.

So this is coming. Now, he said at the very end there, way more significant lockdowns in anything

we've ever seen before, anything under COVID will pale in comparison to what we're about to see.

They don't make these plans. They don't make these moves and these

pre-staging activities if they don't intend to follow through. This is coming. It's going to arrive

very shortly. They're going to lock down the world on the basis of a lack of fuel that they

have deliberately engineered. How could this possibly be an accident? And again, just put everything

into it, right? This wouldn't even be an issue if they had their own refineries, if they

stores their own energy fuels. I mean, it's the same in every single white country in the world.

I was going to say European, New Zealand's not European. Australia's not European. They are white

traditionally, historically. Europe, of course, is exactly the same story. America, of course,

is exactly the same story. At least Trump has done some to free up energy, but obviously under

Joe Biden, they did things like shut down the, was it colonial pipeline?

For absolutely no reason. Stopped new, the Keystone pipeline from being built. They are

deliberately cutting us off from our energy sources so that they have an excuse to

enslave us. It's, again, it's just not complicated at all. UK sitting on one of the biggest

oil natural gas reserves in the North Sea, not tapping it. Sitting on practically endless

coal reserves, not digging it up. Germany systematically went through and eliminated all of its

nuclear reactors. I could have told you that was a bad idea. In fact, I think I did. Doesn't

matter. They did it anyway. It wasn't just that. I mean, they destroyed everything. Here's a

coal power plant that they destroyed in Germany. No reason to. It was working fine. In fact,

I believe this coal power plant cost like billions and billions of dollars and it had been

built like three years before. I think it was like 23 billion dollars from I'm not mistaken.

And they just destroyed it. Why? Because Greta Thunberg was sad.

I mean, the reasons they gave you people to do this, it's just

unbelievable people fell for this.

But hey, it's easy to destroy a hell of a lot more difficult to rebuild.

So it's not being rebuilt. So they're sourcing their energy from elsewhere.

So the flow can be cut off and they can be rationed.

I just don't. I don't understand that this is what I don't get.

It's like on every issue, every issue has been divided in two sides.

It almost seems arbitrary like what side takes up which position? Crazy.

And that's, I'm trying to say this. That is exactly because it's a common thing that I talk

about all the time. So I'm going to come to a place like Israel where it's like Spain is standing

up against Israel. And actually right now a lot of European countries are standing up against

Israel. Italy just came out denouncing Israel very harshly saying that they've crossed the

red line and that they'll be sanctioned. France has said they're no longer cooperating with

Israel at all. Spain has said they're not letting America use their bases anymore.

But Spain's gone even farther and they've been very like anti-Israel. At the same time,

people running Spain who are very, very anti-Israel are also giving out half a million citizenship,

waivers to random Africans that made it into their country. They're murdering depressed girls

who were raped in a state orphanage and then the crime was covered up. It's like they're just

awful in every possible way. But they seem to be right about Israel. Europe,

kind of the whole continent is like this where it's like, hey, at least their food is edible,

like they're wrong about everything, but at least their food is edible.

Europe slams Israel over death penalty bill and freedom of religion.

I mean, yeah, the death penalty bill, what we'll get into that, because

again, it's just everything is false dichotomies. So,

what we'll get back into the death penalty thing. But the thing I really don't understand is

it's like, okay, all of these topics seem to be split into two and you got to take one side or

the other. And it's always the worst side that gets what they want, like every single time.

I don't understand it to be quite frank with you and we'll get into a lot of other

examples throughout this. But it really does seem like it's just impossible to find any

political movement at all that represents more than 50% of the population.

And while they might believe some things that are just like basically true, just like very

basic and simple and obvious, I don't know, it's just like the craziest extremist that will

believe that I just I really don't get what the hell is going on in the world. So

why the hell did all of Europe give up its energy production? Why the hell did we

close the straight-of-war movies? Why did we attack Iran? Like, why is any of this happening

if it's not on purpose? That's when you understand, okay, the world, the European nations, America,

everywhere, basically, except for, you know, a few places that you can probably figure out,

Iran, Russia, China. They're all controlled by psychopaths that are trying to set up a

one-world government and they need to eradicate mass amounts of humans in order to do that.

First and foremost, the humans that would stand up against such a tyrannical manifestation.

So then everything makes sense. Then it's like, okay, this all makes sense. It's still infuriating

and it's only possible because of the willing blindness of everybody underneath. And I don't

get how we break out of this false out of all of these false dichotomies, I should say.

I gotta pull in some videos from yesterday.

Be up. Again, we need to be heading this off at the past. Like right now, they're modeling,

you know, the models. So the models that they use to tell everybody that COVID would kill everybody,

that they use to justify the insane lockdown measures that were more damaging than the virus

itself. It's those same type of models that they're now running. United Kingdom was one of the

world's earliest adopters of coal. I mean, I've explained it before. And like, this is the thing.

It's like when I think about what we as Americans need to do to free ourselves. Like,

we can't be divided against ourselves. We have to come together and say at the very least,

can we not agree that America should be America first, that our government should represent us

and not a foreign nation like all of this seems obvious. But like in the outreach to the left,

it's like, you guys gotta stop being idiots. You gotta stop falling for the bull crap.

Can we not all understand that Bill Gates does not have your best interest in mind when he's

running programs? I mean, we've been through, I mean, I just play the pitch meeting about climate

change. Although that one sounds popular as others. I think people think I'm making it up.

But like everything in the pitch, in the climate change pitch meeting, you can find on

Axe adheres, Nate Smith, it's all just straight out of the headline. So like the stories about,

oh, they're no longer burning coal because that produces carbons. And now they're cutting down

forest in America, shipping it across the ocean, burning the trees and calling that carbon neutral.

Like that's insane. That's not the least of the insanity. 12 million trees cut down in Scotland

to build windmills, deforesting parts of the rainforest to have a climate change agenda meeting.

Start up by Bill Gates that is literally cutting down trees and burying them.

Just burying them, not using them for anything, just deforesting an area,

burying the trees in the ground and calling it carbon capture sinks.

So the trees, the natural filters that take in carbon dioxide and put out oxygen,

those are being cut down and destroyed while they're producing giant machines to try to

siphon the carbon out of the air through gigantic filters. It's, I mean, this is all absurd.

So like, how do we come together on the left? Like I genuinely want to sit down on the left and

be like, do you really think anybody in the world is spraying sulfuric acid or ionized aluminum

into the atmosphere because they love you? Do you really think that's what they're doing?

Do you really think they're so concerned about preserving life on earth that they're going to

irreversibly poison the stratosphere? Like what are you talking about? How can we not come together

on this? How can, how is it only one side that sees through this? It is absurd.

Same thing on the right. It's like, okay, maybe you have your head on straight when it comes to like

surveillance or big government or with a welfare state, but then like you will fight to the death

for the right of BlackRock to buy up every home in the state. It's like what is going on? Why can people

not just see the truth for what it is? It really is the biggest problem in the world and like the

exclusive problem that we have to try to solve it. It really shouldn't be this difficult to come

together on all of this. And on that note, I'm going to go to clip 29 here. This is Brandon

Strock of the walk away movement. It's probably the best speech at CPAC this year. Brandon Strock

clip 29. He's calling out, and he did it in such a brilliant way that it, it doesn't come across

this way. But what he's actually doing here is directly calling out the mega Israeli foreign

influence in MAGA that is trying to dictate and control the conversation. Because what he's asking

is when did we become the left? And by the way, the rope, the woke right, as they like to call it,

the woke right are not the ones who are acting like the left. We're not the ones calling everybody

Nazis and Racists and bigots in order to shut them down because we can't actually win

debates. That's the mega side of things. That is the establishment for a public and neon

neocon side of things that's doing that now. Let's go to clip 29. Here's Brandon Strock

playing it out. When I was going through my hell, only two members, elected members of Congress took

my phone calls. Two, that was Lauren Bobert and Marjorie Taylor Greene. Marjorie was one of the

only elected members of Congress to visit J6ers in prison. She was the only member of Congress to

sponsor the Matthew Lawrence Pernibill, named after one of the J6ers who committed suicide due to

the brutality he endured at the hands of the United States government. And a few years ago,

she came to the walkaway booth at CPAC and held my hands and prayed with me while the media took

pictures of us and mocked us. And now a directive has gone out that Marjorie Taylor Greene is a traitor.

And if you want to be a part of the in crowd, it is mandatory that you must hate her too.

If I were to ask probably at least half the people in this room would say that they didn't like

her anymore. And if I were to ask why, I bet the majority wouldn't even know themselves.

When did we become the left? When did we become hive-minded, mean, and tribal? When did we decide

that not only must we cancel those we disagree with, but we must control the people around us with

intimidation, demanding that they think the way we think and join the cancel mob 2 or be branded

themselves? And when did we allow some of the most toxic, nasty, and vicious people on the planet

to become the spokespeople for MAGA and the arbiters of purity tests deciding who is and isn't

worthy enough to continue to call themselves MAGA? But perhaps, most importantly,

when did we decide that it was off-limits to question our own government or the government of

any other country? Let me tell you something. If you call yourself a patriot, but you believe

that it is your obligation to only praise and only worship your president, then you must not be

a patriot of this country, because leader worship is how citizens behave in nations that aren't free.

You can love your president and you should, but it is your duty and your obligation as a free

citizen of the United States of America to challenge and question your government every day,

regardless of who the president of the United States is.

So again, I think he's exactly right. And this sort of gets down to the, you know, the fundamental

characteristics of America. And I was thinking about this especially with the passing of the

death penalty law in Israel, which I believe, unless I'm mistaken, represents the first time ever

that a country has passed a law in which one ethnic group can be given the death penalty,

but that that punishment is spared other ethnic groups. So the Palestinians now,

when accused and denied the right to trial, can be executed by Israel and they're celebrating

this and they're cheering this. And I'll show you some videos about this a little bit later.

But it just strikes me that it is diametrically opposed to like the first sentence

of our founding document. Like you can't get anymore like primordial, then we hold these truths

to be self-evident. That all men are created equal. Now, obviously, that's been perverted and twisted

to represent some sort of weird equality where we're supposed to pretend that person with 70 IQ

and a person with 160 IQ should somehow score the same on test. That's never what it meant.

It meant that in the eyes of God and in the eyes of justice that every man was born, you know,

morally a blank slate. How can you justify anything that Israel does in that paradigm? How could

you possibly claim that anything Israel does represents the West or American interests? They

everything they do is diametrically opposed to everything we believe in. And that's the same

of the left wing in this country. And it's the same lot of supposed mega, you know, neocon infiltrators

at this point. We don't have to like debate about what our country's morals are. They were

written down in documents and they're firmly rooted in a metaphysical perception of the world

and stir right from Christianity that everything our leadership does, everything our banking class does,

everything the foreigners do, everything the left does is all diametrically opposed to, just obvious.

Please do find and share these videos at info wars.com for its last show band dot video.

We got a lot of corruption to try to sort through here.

And I want to go back and just there's been some newly released information or rather newly

popularized information, but it corresponds to and sort of dovetails with everything else we've

already known. Of course, over the weekend, the Tucker Carlson network made the BB files public.

That's a documentary about Benjamin Netanyahu. It was actually published, I believe in like November

2024, something around that, but this was the first time it was released for free and publicly,

I guess, and it's gone totally viral. And a couple of scenes from it have stood out as highlights,

one of which is Benjamin Netanyahu admitting to funding Hamas with literal suitcases full of cash

and the purpose behind his willingness to do so. So I want to try to really lay out what all

of this means. We'll go first to that clip, clip number eight here. Netanyahu funded Hamas with

millions a month from Qatar suitcases filled with US dollars delivered every single month

because they wanted Hamas, the violent party in Gaza to run things so they hadn't excuse to

attack him. Let's watch. The public blames Netanyahu for October 7th as the one who fed the beast.

He did not create Hamas, but he fed it. Netanyahu who is against peace and who is against

having a Palestinian state, dealt with Hamas for a long time as a strategic friend.

He says this is confidential and can't be leaked, right? We have neighbors here sworn in

enemies. This is Benjamin Netanyahu speaking. I'm constantly passing the messages. I confuse them,

mislead them, lie to them, and then hit them over their heads. It was important for him to keep

Gaza under the control of Hamas and keeping the West back under the control of Fateh and preventing

them from being united in any way. In order to do so, Netanyahu was all the time helping Hamas to

survive. At the same time that he was under investigation, he arranged for Hamas to

receive $35 million every month from Qatar. Netanyahu can't give the money by himself as well,

without giving money to the Hamas. You cannot even trust for this money through banks,

because even the banks don't want to cooperate. So you, the Israeli Prime Minister, needs to beg

the small and very rich country Qatar to give money to our enemy.

This suitcase of money was given to Hamas under the request of Benjamin Netanyahu personally,

and because the Qatarians knew him from the beginning, they were asking him to send them his requests

and writing, because they knew that he's going to lie in the future.

He allowed more than one billion to be transferred to the hands of the Hamas,

because he believed that he can control the level of Fateh and its nonsense. He cannot control the

flames. Yes, Prime Minister, what is your opinion of Qatari money entering Gaza? Will it help keep

calm in the strip? Your spawns, I do whatever I can, in coordination with the security agencies,

to bring quiet back to the towns in southern Israel. Every step has a price without exception,

you take steps as a leader, there is always a price. If you cannot handle the price, you cannot

leave. And I know how to handle the price. Your strategy was, keep Hamas there. We can

the Palestinian Authority on the West Bank sustain the extremists. We can demotivate

this exploded in our faces in the most brutal way on October 7th.

BB tells the world, again and again and again, I'm the expert on terrorism. I know how to fight

terrorism. I'm the protector of Israel. And under his regime, we get into this incredible, unbelievable war.

All right, so Israel drove suitcases and stuff to the cash into Gaza to keep Hamas in power.

And again, they explain the reasoning there. So all of the claims from all of the, you know,

Israeli firsters, all of the traders, like Laura Lumer and Mark Levin, all these people, Tucker

Katarelsen, it's all pure unadulterated 100% 200 proof projection. They are in bed with

the Qataris. They are the ones funding Hamas. They are the only reason Hamas is in power at all

on purpose because they want an enemy to go to war with. All right, so the very existence of Hamas,

their power and the Gaza Strip, their ability to have anything is all funded directly by American

taxpayers who pay everything that Israel has. It all comes from us. They send it to Qatar,

who sends it to Gaza to keep the terrorists in power. Okay, that's just how it works. Take it

up with reality if you disagree. But we can take it a step farther than that because not only

was Hamas allowed to operate funded by the Israel, I mean, $35 million a month.

It buys a hell of a lot of weapons. That buys a hell of a lot of, I don't know, cooperation

from people around to probably be spent on bribes or foreign states. I mean,

it's strategically incomprehensible if you don't understand that it's all designed to set up Gaza

to eventually receive the fate. It is now experienced. If you had any legitimate concern about

Hamas at all, you wouldn't give them a dollar. This should be obvious. I shouldn't have to explain

this, but it goes way, way deeper than that. So we can go to the video I just put in. This is from

a official hearing in the Israeli Knesset with a soldier who was there on the front line in,

you know, between on the Gaza border with Israel on October 7th revealing that there was a

stand-down order for several hours directly telling before the attack you and began telling the

Gaza patrols to stand down and allowing the attack to take place. Let's watch.

6.30 in the morning, October 7th. You're at the outpost. He's being asked.

Any response? Well, for us, October 7th starts before 6.30. That was when the attack started.

I was a soldier in the mortar platoon of the Galani's Brigade, 13th Battalion. And that night,

myself, Yotar Surur, my sergeant, Tamar Bin Yahudah, may he rest in peace.

The three of us were pulling an all-nighter. On Sabbaths and holidays, we'd let ourselves

pull an all-nighter until dawn, stand to, and you know, we're in the mortar platoon,

have time to sleep until the next stand to. So at 5.20 a.m., we're sitting by the radio, so as not

to wake up the radio operator. And my deputy commander, Battalion Commander, near Boynfield,

who was also seriously injured and thank God he survived, suddenly gets on the radio with a

strut with a strange message. All stations, I don't know why, I don't know how, something along

those lines. No patrols on the fence until 9.00 a.m., and what time was this? 5.20 in the morning.

And here's the recording of the audio. All stations are to hold their positions, so in terms of

ground forces and orev, we don't have anything significant. The Brigade issued a directive to

our forces pinning a situational assessment at until 9.00 a.m., no vehicles to approach Burma.

I'll say again, until 9 in the morning, pinning the situation assessment, no vehicles to go down

to Burma. We're in rear-staging areas of brigade-level arrangement, I don't know exactly why.

I don't ask too many questions, that's the directive, that's what we do. This is before the

attack began, so a little before it all begins, and Tomor gives us a look like, what?

And you know we're simple soldiers, just combatants. No commanders or officers who can ask questions.

It's an order from the deputy battalion commander, we take the order and don't ask questions

a routine passing of an order. Ensure enough, an hour later, at 6.30, suddenly sirens.

Yuri, I'll tell you the truth, I've been living with this since October 7th,

this simulator on TV, and I was afraid to talk about it. And when I got to the kineset,

I was, it was after a period when I asked some of the officers what really happened there,

who were there, and there were some who initially told me, listen, there was a sniper threat from

nook boat, we didn't want to send soldiers, so they wouldn't get hit. And then over time,

it kind of dawned on me, I said, wait, if there's a sniper threat, how can it be that I,

whom only 200 meters from the fence, don't know there's a threat, how can it be my friends are

fighting without a vest, and they're underwear and socks, and nobody knows that something is

happening, we're only 200, 300 meters from the fence. And that was when my mind again, and really,

I was suddenly invited to the kineset, I felt this was a real opportunity to open this subject and

talk about it, to actually understand what happened there. And look, like you're saying, to a lot of

people, it sounds strange, and actually what happened there, and we're going to go back to this again,

and I'll be honest, Hila, we, I've been living with some kind of hole in my brain since October 7th,

there's something in my heart, feels to me that, listen, I don't know what there was, I don't know

what happened, I don't want to understand happened, like everyone, look, the deputy battalion commander

wasn't a sniper threat, because the deputy battalion commander says I have no idea why, and not why,

and at sniper threat there's many times, he says this in real time, at 520 in the morning, it's not

like someone told him to say that, he received an order without an explanation, and it's, right,

so we as soldiers, he says, when we hear this thing, then we of course follow orders,

it did sound a little strange to us, but soldiers in the field, and we've been on this line for

almost half a year, and a few losses here or there, you know, for a loss from October 7th,

there are, cool losses, yes, breaches of order, right, from breaches of order to a situation,

to events like those of October 7th, we're talking about here, you know,

something that's surreal, something very strange, anyway, we can take it down, you get it, you understand it,

there was a stand down order, an hour before the attack began, that you just heard,

the recording of, saying I don't know why, but you got to stand down until 9am, the attack hadn't

started yet, there was no sniper, later they go back and say, well, here's a good reason why we

did that, maybe there was a sniper, and it's like, okay, but I was right there, there was no sniper,

they didn't say there was a sniper, didn't make any sense, because there were people out there

with no vests on, wouldn't you tell them there was a sniper if that was the case, so that's a lie,

there was no sniper, they told them to stand down because they knew the attack was coming, and by the

way, you know, the, you know, most sort of gruesome images of the attack happened at the Nova

Music Festival, which wasn't supposed to be there, and was without explanation relocated days before

the festival was supposed to happen, they decided, again, with no reason, no justification,

to move that festival to a place directly in between it to military

installments, knowing that those two military installments were going to be attacked, and that

by necessity, the, you know, Hamas siege would inevitably run right into the Nova Music Festival.

So this was all planned, it was all an operation, it was all an op, a false flag,

and there's, there's more to it than that, of course, Egypt warned Israel days before Hamas

struck, according to a US committee chairman, and actually one of Netanyahu's lieutenants

is having beef with him and just came out with an article and said, release the audio from the

Egyptians, that will ruin Netanyahu. So apparently there's also recordings out there somewhere of the

Egyptians telling Benjamin Netanyahu exactly what was about to happen on October 7th, proving that

he knew exactly what was going on, which makes the stand-down order

beyond inexplicable, right? It would be inexplicable if there really was no foreign knowledge,

then why the hell would you tell people to stand down? But you do have foreign knowledge and

you still tell people to stand down? I mean, the stand-down order in and of itself is evidence,

I think, of a stand-down order, but you could still claim it was just something coincidental.

But not if you actually have the facts on the ground, but then it goes a step beyond. So Netanyahu

funds Hamas. They receive signals and are aware that this attack is coming. They deliberately

tell the soldiers to stand down so the patrols aren't there when the fence first gets broken through.

Then there's an additional stand-down order of six hours while the pillaging goes on that nobody

is going to confront them. Then when the Israeli army does show up, it enacts the Hannibal directive

in which the Israeli army kills most of the people that died on October 7th. We can go to the

Vince Swan production about this. We won't watch the whole thing, but the first few minutes,

clip number nine, never forget on October 7th, Israeli military admitted to killing many of

their own people. Let's watch. Images and videos of burnt cars, black and charred bodies,

and incinerated homes in southern Israel were plastered on every phone screen and television

after the October 7th Hamas attacks. The images and videos were used by the Israeli government

to justify the military's heavy-handed tactics in their ongoing war against Hamas, but were they

actually the result of the Hamas attack? Surely, Israeli civilians were brutally killed by Hamas

on October 7th, but there's mounting evidence that we think any responsible journalist needs to

examine. Let's take a look at something called the Hannibal directive. I'm investigative journalist

Vince Swan, and this is Reckoning, Israel and Gaza.

So far in this investigative series, we have discussed how Israel had received

concrete and credible intelligence from foreign intelligence agencies, their own military,

and even Israeli citizens about where and when the October 7th Hamas attacks would take place.

The military rammed through the approval of the Nova Music Festival at the last minute,

despite pushback from people within the army, and even threatened legal action against soldiers

who tried warning and preparing for the Hamas attack. And when the attack began, what did the

military do? Well, nothing. Evidence we've uncovered points to there being some type of military

stand-down at the beginning of the attack. But we need to take a look at another crucial aspect

of that day. When the IDF began to finally use their firepower and military to engage Hamas

in southern Israel, did they exclusively target enemy militants? Well, evidence actually points

to no. To understand what the Israeli military did to their own civilians on October 7th,

you have to understand the political aspirations of Hamas and what the goal of taking hostages is,

political leverage. There are over 10,000 Palestinians in Israeli jails, 3,000 of whom have not

been to trial or charged with the crime. When militant groups manage to capture Israeli

civilians or soldiers, it gives them leverage to force a prisoner's law and to get some of their

people out of Israeli prison. For example, in 1986, Hamas managed to kidnap three Israeli soldiers

and bring them into Gaza. They demanded 1,150 Palestinian prisoners in return for those three

soldiers. Well, after this, the military drafted a secret field order to prevent future kidnappings.

It was called the Hannibal Directive. The Directive gets its name from the Carthinogen general

who chose to poison himself rather than allow himself to be captured alive by the Romans. Back

in 2003, again, strangely enough, October 7th, 2003, three Israeli soldiers were taken hostage

and brought into Lebanon. Following the activation of the Hannibal Directive, IDF attack helicopters

fired indiscriminately on 26 vehicles, thus ensuring the death of their own soldiers,

and therefore robbing levity's militants of the ability to demand Israel make concessions.

The last known application of the Hannibal Directive was 2014 in Rafa. Hamas fighters managed

to capture an Israeli soldier, Lieutenant Hadar Golden. Instead of allowing the lieutenant to be used

as leverage by Hamas, though, the military killed him, dropping bombs, missiles, and shells on the

area he was being held, killing that soldier and also a hundred Palestinian civilians.

The scale of the Hannibal Directive on October 7th was entirely different, though, from those

of the past. A retired Israeli Air Force general, Nauf Ares, described it during a podcast with

Herets and Israeli newspapers saying that, quote, the Hannibal Directive was apparently applied

at a certain stage, because at the moment they understand there is a kidnapping, they immediately

say, guys, this is a Hannibal. But the Hannibal we trained for all of the last 20 years is for a

vehicle. We know at what point defense it enters on what side it drives, maybe even on which

road it drives. This was a mass Hannibal. Now, think about that term, a mass Hannibal. We all know the

Hannibal Directive means to kill your own. So what does mass Hannibal mean? Well, if you look at

Israeli media, you're going to find some pretty interesting things. Let's read this quote directly

from Wyndead, a large mainstream Israeli media outlet, quote, in the week after Black Shabbat,

October 7th. Soldiers of elite units at the initiative of the Southern command checked about

70 vehicles that remained in the area between the Otaf settlements and the Gaza Strip.

These are vehicles that did not reach Gaza, because on the way there, they were shot by a

combat helicopter, an anti-tank missile or tank. And at least in some cases, everyone in the vehicle

was killed, in quote, 70 vehicles. And in some cases, everyone in the vehicle was killed.

These are Israelis killed by Israel. Again, only reported on in Israeli media. Here in the U.S.,

we keep seeing pictures repeatedly of cars burnt to a crisp as evidence of Hamas' barbarism.

But was it Hamas' AK-47s and homemade rockets that burnt all these cars to a crisp? Or perhaps

hellfire and anti-tank missiles? Tuvala Scapia is a member of the security team for the Kubut's

Barrary. He said of a hotline, so Kubut's residents could communicate with the Israeli army.

He told her rest, the quote, the commanders in the field made difficult decisions,

including shelling houses on their occupants. In order to eliminate.

Again, this goes on. Ben Swandas does a fantastic and thorough job of breaking this down.

Vigilant news has it episode four. What is the Hannibal directive reckoning Israel and Gaza?

So Netanyahu funds Hamas. They issue standdown orders before the attack

begins. They move the Nova music festival into position before the attack begins. Once the

attack begins, even though they had four knowledge of it, they do nothing to respond for six hours.

That's the second standdown order. When they do respond, they kill a bunch of their own people to

maximize the death count and get the impetus for the planned war in Gaza. All of this was planned

long, long before any of it came to fruition. And then on top of that, they come up with a

couple of really ridiculous lies that are immediately disproven, but nevertheless, still

find themselves cropping up in discussions about this, including the 40 beheaded babies,

put in ovens, and the mass rape gangs. None of that ever happened. There's been no proof for it.

It's actually all been thoroughly discredited those claims. It doesn't matter, though, okay?

I mean, we've heard from people in the cabutses, hostages that were recovered saying, yeah,

it was the Israeli government that was firing at us. It was the Israeli government that tried to

kill us, okay? So none of this is speculation. All of this is confirmed from official sources.

This is not complicated. So what is it all for? What is it all about? It was all in service

of what's happening right now. The Iran War, the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad in Syria,

and the takeover of Lebanon, just like they did under Gaza. We can go now to clip number 27.

This has been Zaniyahu admitting what I've been trying to tell you for the last two years

that all of this is in service of building up Israel to be a competitor with America and a super

power in its own right. Here's Zaniyahu saying exactly that. And this is the guarantee for our

future. We are working on transforming Israel into a super nation in the region and globally,

and we were able to do so thanks to our soldiers and our captains and all those who fought and those

who died. And of course, thanks to your solidarity and your steadfastness.

So there's Zaniyahu saying that Israel will become a super power in thanking all of us

idiotic Western countries for doing the heavy lifting for them, for granting this to them,

for gifting this to them on a silver platter made out of our own, you know, sweat, blood,

piles of cash that they then send to Hamas. All of this is on purpose. Put yourself in the position

of Benjamin Aiyahu November or rather August 2023, right. You're about to be brought up on

corruption charges that they've got you dead to rights and you're going down. But you believe

you have this messianic, you know, belief that you are this all important, you know, figure that

will bring about the antichrist. And your goal to achieve this is to create the greater Israel

project, but you can't just do that. I mean, you've seen the way that despite the hypocrisy

incumbent and all of it, you've seen the way that Russia was demonized for simply trying to defend

themselves and seeing crunchment of NATO. You can't just go in and try to take land. I mean,

they could, because there is really, and the law's done apply to them and everything gets inverted

when it's Israel and not another country doing it. So, you know, but you gotta, you gotta have a

reason, you gotta have an excuse. You don't have an excuse, but your plan is to destroy an annex,

Gaza, destroy an annex, the West Bank, destroy an annex, large portions of Lebanon, take out Syria,

take out Iran, leave them either as puppets under your control or simply as, you know, chaotic

battlefields that you'll get around to eventually once you're done judyizing the places that you're

annexing right now. You can't just go do this. You have to have an excuse. So you create October 7th.

You do the Hannibal directive. You maximize the pain that Israel is feeling. And so you have this

very, you know, anxious, like, disturbed, concerned, fearful populace that is just like, okay,

just do it. Just protect us. Whatever you can do, because they've been, you know,

mass traumatized by your operation. Of course, they don't know or they're lying about it being your

operation. And so they either are tricked into or are just, you know, lying along with you and

pretending to be scared of Gaza and saying, oh my god, we can't wait. We can't think about it. We

can't debate whether or not we should bomb the hospital. This is an emergency bomb the hospital.

Bomb it right now. Bomb all the hospitals. Bomb all the schools. It's World War 3, you guys.

I'm going to get back a little bit into what's going on in the Middle East. You've got

pogroms happening against Christians and Syria while their leader shakes hands and meets with

European leaders in 10 Downing Street because all of this is, I mean, the people without just

don't actually believe anything. I hope that's been established now. So ridiculous. But this

occurred just before the show began. I haven't actually watched it yet. Apparently James O'Keefe

was just served a restraining order at his West Palm Beach headquarters while live on air.

So let's go to this clip number four here. This is James O'Keefe who's been leading this

charge. He calls the Justice League where a whole bunch of independent reporters are going in

investigating and capturing like red handed guilty footage of people handing out money for

signatures. I imagine that's what this has to do with. Let's watch clip number four.

Have you ever served a domestic restraining order against the newsroom before?

You ever you ever serve a restraining order against the journalist?

I'm not sure to be honest with you. So I don't think you understand what you're involved in

here. I don't I don't understand. I don't know what everybody does for a living. So I may

have served somebody that's well you well we're we're we're a news organization. There's

something called the the First Amendment and it doesn't it prohibits people from serving restraining

orders against us from reporting what they say. It's a pretty fundamental constitutional right.

Again, this is a court order signed by a judge out of Miami. All we're doing is serving to you.

Well, I look very much I look very much forward to speaking with that judge and talking to them.

So what is all this? This is the all yours. Okay. You're responsible for everything that's in the

in the restraining order. Okay. There's you know. Well, thank you for being here and I will tell

it to the courts. I know you're just doing your job, but I hope you I hope you watch the video

of the man saying he wants to kill me. I know I know. One of the problems in this country is that

we're we're in a constitutional crisis. I'm just telling you my opinion and we report people

breaking the law. We report people doing illegal things and and they're never held accountable. I'm

the one who's brought to court. I'm the one who's arrested. I'm the one who's sued and the American

people are just pissed off. They're just upset. And I know this has nothing to do with you. I know

you don't you can't say anything. I respect that. I'm I'm just a little upset. I'm a little

discouraged. I'm I'm losing hope and I'm the guy that can't lose hope because people look up to

me. But I'm the one who keeps getting held accountable. You understand what I'm saying?

Something has to change. Not for my sake, but for our children's sake. You know what I mean?

And I know you're just doing your job and I get it. I understand, but but we're we're entering

a constitutional crisis in the United States. And and today I've got a police officer bringing

me to court. You know, and I got I got to ask myself why am I even why am I even doing this?

Why should I continue? That's the question that that I have to ask myself. If it's just going

to bring me pain and punishment and abuse. You know what I mean? And I and I get there's

nothing you can do. It's not your job. You know, but here we are. That's where we are in this country.

So I mean, I literally off top of my head, I could probably name like at least 10 things that James

O'Keefe has uncovered that are like truly criminal conspiracies. I mean, what he's covering right now

in California. Absolutely criminal beyond any speculation or anything.

Palm Beach Sheriff County Department just served me with the domestic violence restraining order

from Matthew Tehrman, the former board member from Project Veritas who says he wants to murder me.

Despite attempting multiple times on admitting multiple times on Hidden Camera, he want wanting

me dead. Matthew Tehrman follow a restraining order against me in Miami-Dade County. Saying

things such as, quote, I would kill him O'Keefe because he's one of the most evil people I've ever

known, even shot up my book with rifle bullets through my heart on the cover, the Audacity of Evil

as No Bounds. Something strange happened today and I think it might just be

something we like to call Magic Fairy Dust. I think there's Magic Fairy Dust in the world.

I think that there's been a, I don't know, some sort of spell cast. I don't know if a fairy

godmother is at work, perhaps some cute little animal helpers cropped up. Something has happened

to Lindsey Graham, the princess. Our princess Lindsey Graham has transformed

at midnight back into a pumpkin, I guess. I don't know. It's got to be something

and all we know about Lindsey Graham is that he spent the last couple days

suspiciously wandering around Disney World with a fairy scepter.

Doing god knows what, doesn't have kids, doesn't have friends or a wife. So I guess just buy

him just solo Disney World trip with the fairy scepter in tow. And something happened in this time.

We don't know if Tinkerbell sprinkled something on his nose. There could have been some sort of

wishing upon a star situation. We're really, we're open to all suggestions, but something has

happened here where Lindsey Graham has transformed from Neocon back into a patriot.

Again, if we have better suggestions, I'd love to hear from them. We've been reaching out

to Jiminy Cricket. He refuses to come on, but we're really, we're trying to get to the bottom of

this. Okay, you know, maybe had a long in depth talk with Minnie Mouse. Could be Mickey and

Minnie sitting there like, you're not supposed to kill children, Lindsey. He's like, thanks for

telling me you guys. You've really opened up my eyes. I don't know. We don't know what it is, but

something magical has occurred at the Magic Kingdom and has transformed Lindsey Graham into somebody

with the bare minimum amount of patriotism to recognize that Iran and war with Iran is not

actually in our best interest. Quote, wind down Iran war, wind up efforts for peace deal says Senator

Lindsey Graham of all people. There's a couple options here. One of them is magical intervention.

Okay, we're not discounting that. I just, I would think there would be signs of some sort.

Lindsey Graham, we haven't seen him in address. I'm not saying he doesn't wear one.

I've never seen him with glass slippers, but it's possible. So that's one option. The other

option is that he finally took a look at the polls from his home state of South Carolina and realized

that being a despicable, closeted homosexual war mongering freak is not exactly the most

electable thing. Oh, yeah, then yesterday he posted a picture of a shotgun. Yes,

I'm sorry. Yesterday spent some time breaking clays in Edgefield County today. Doesn't get

much better than that. I thought you were a Disney world. Are you shooting Disney characters?

Is Lindsey Graham hunting the Disney characters? Is that what's happening here?

I mean, just the most transparent coverup I've ever seen. Lindsey, they've got pictures of you with

the gay sector at Disney World all by yourself. And he's like quick, go in the archives and find me

it. Find a picture of me looking manly. Find a picture of me with a gun or something.

Okay. No, that worked. No, work, we're convinced. We are all tricked.

Okay, so these are the, yeah, that's more like it. These are the options, either.

Lindsey Graham's fairy godmother has finally smacked him with a wand and did shake his brain loose.

And he understands that Warthoron is stupid in every possible way. Or he's looked at the

internal polling and realized that his career is over. If he doesn't change literally everything

about himself from the bottom up, or this is literally all according to plan. And now that they

have gotten what they wanted out of Trump, the ridiculous, completely ill advised. And at this

point, thoroughly disastrous Warthoron. And now they're throwing him under the bus. And they're

going to say, well, yeah, I said, well, we should have peace. I mean, a month into it, I said,

Trump, time to throw in the towel, brother.

There's a lot of words I can't say right now. Lindsey Graham said Monday, he's encouraged

President Trump to wind down the Warner Ron, wind up efforts for peace while noting that it would

take an agreement from both parties to resolve conflict at least. Yeah, that's true. Good point.

Keep it up, Mr. President, wind down the war and wind up efforts for historic peace deal.

Graham said on a post on social media platform, Max. It works for Lindsey. Should I just do the

whole show? I mean, is this how I should talk? It works for him. I don't know what it is.

He's touting serious discussions in what Trump described as a new and reasonable regime in Iran.

Graham has come under criticism for public comments that seems to suggest support for using

ground troops in Iran. Yeah, it seems to suggest that when he's like, we need ground troops in Iran.

It's like, yeah, it seems like he wants ground troops in Iran. I'm picking up a signal here.

Quote, Washington's war machine is hard at work. They're trying to drag us into Iran to make it another

Iraq. We can't let them said representative Nancy Mace in a post on X last week. And yes,

when we say Washington's war machine, we mean Lindsey Graham, she said. Graham continued to

support military action in his remarks on X, but lean towards finding a diplomatic solution.

I support diplomatic efforts to end the conflict consistent with our military objectives,

but it takes two to tango. You would know. The necessity for military action is weeks, not months,

and operation epic theory is well ahead of pace, he wrote on X. Okay, so something strange is

happening. Something mystical and magical and curious is unfolding before us as is somebody,

is anybody calling Lindsey Graham a panicking? Is anybody claiming that he is a anti-Semite

that he wants to kill all the Jews? No, so he's allowed to oppose the war in Iran. Okay,

so he's only allowed to oppose the war in Iran after it's at a point to which there is no return.

I'm sensing a pattern here with a bunch of people. You know, yesterday, there was an interview

with Larry Fink where he came out against DEI and ESG, the very things that he and his organization

invented in the first place and then imposed on everybody using their monopolistic control

of the American financial market. Now he's against it, now he's opposed to it.

You know what that means? That means they've run the numbers, they've run the algorithms,

they've fed it into the simulation machine in AI and they've determined it's too late for us to

do anything about it. So now they can come out against it. Now that the damage that they've

done is irreversible, they can pretend to be the champions against the very thing that they

attacked us with. I'm sensing a similarity with Lindsey Graham. Now that you believed Lindsey

Graham, now that you listened to him and did what he wanted and got us into trouble from which

there is seemingly no escape. Now he's going to come out and say, actually this was a bad idea

all along. Does anybody else sick of this? Senator Lindsey Graham, I'm going back to South

Carolina asking them to send their sons and daughters over to the mid east. Yeah, how'd that work

out for you, Princess? How'd that work out for you, Lady Graham?

Oil slides as Trump reportedly told AIDS, he's willing to end the war without reopening

horror movies. Again, I mean, I cannot explain what a ridiculous failure this is. It's almost

funny to me arguing with people on X that are still supporting this war. Lindsey Graham doesn't

even support the war anymore. President Trump doesn't even support the war anymore. We are now one

month and a few days into this war and it's already a disaster for which our best possible scenario,

our best case scenario at this point, is not even returning to status quo,

not even getting back to a pre-war situation. So we can just write off this whole war like, okay,

it costs us billions of dollars. People died. Right families have been shattered.

Money's been just spent with abandoned. I mean, there's already been a bad stuff, but hey,

we're just going right back to normal. Like, if that was the case, it would already be a ridiculous

disaster. We're not even trying to get the Straits of Hormuz open anymore, apparently.

So now, according to the people in power, the best case scenario is we get back to a position

that we were before the war, only significantly impoverished and not having controlled the

Straits of Hormuz significantly weakened in every possible way. We're only a month in,

I already feel like demanding apologies from everybody that got us into this because it's already

been shown that there is no positive outcome even possible from people in power.

So where do we go from here? Because it seems to me like all of these things need to be just

sort of added to the list. Now, we're lucky because it's all the same people doing this,

like all of these different things. Otherwise, the list would be just inconceivably huge,

but it's not that big. It's a certain amount of people because when Larry Fink comes out and

admits ESG or DEI wasn't the best thing to do. He's not talking about some sort of Chick-fil-A

unveiled a new coupon that didn't deal wasn't that popular. It's not like this is just some small

thing. They're like, hey, let's try this out over here and I didn't work. Okay, never mind. We're

calling that off. They deliberately reorganized our entire society. They deliberately excluded an

entire generation specifically of white men but of white people overall from the power structure.

The effects of that have been devastating to a degree that we can't even calculate and is only

going to get worse as we move forward. Okay? So I don't think we need to move on from this.

I think we need to charge these people with crimes against humanity because they knew exactly what

they were doing. That's sort of the theme of everything that we're talking about today, isn't it,

that all of this stuff is deliberate, that all of these outcomes were imminently predictable. If

not manufactured on purpose for this exact outcome, we sit now on the cusp of a new new world order

where Israel is a absolute superpower. America has had our ability to project power thoroughly

diminished. We've been humiliated on the world stage. China is rising. Iran is now proven that they

can stand on their own. And if they are entering talks, which the president of Iran is talking

about possibly entering talks, but they say like, but we need guarantees that we won't be

attacked in the future. Well, who's going to trust guarantees from Israel or America?

Those guarantees mean nothing. Literally while you're negotiating the guarantees,

it's likely they'll bomb you to death. So it's like the guarantees that they won't be attacked

anymore is in a eradication of Israel and America's ability to attack them uncontested.

I'll say again, the purpose of Israel's war against Iran is to leave it in a state like Syria

in a condition that the state of Syria is in, in which they can bomb them whenever they want,

for whatever reason what they want, and that the country they're bombing has no ability to respond.

That's the ideal condition for Israel. Is that Iran is just a fractured mess, a chaotic hell

world of interminable conflict between ethnic factions that Israel can occasionally come in,

bomb some infrastructure, they call it mowing the lawn, right? That's what they want in Iran.

That's what they want in the Middle East. It's what they want really around the entire world.

Just they have to start with their immediate neighbors, but they'll expand.

That's the purpose of all of this. So again, whether it's the war in Iran and the lockdowns

coming as a consequence, or the stand-down orders that led to the attack on October 7th,

that led to the invasion of Gaza that led to Hezbollah getting involved,

that led to the invasion of Lebanon. These things are all planned for, and you know that's the case,

because literally on October 9th, I hosted the Alex Jones show and laid all of this out for you,

and said very specifically how this would inevitably lead to a greater conflict with Iran,

and that Israel would necessitate American boots on the ground to achieve their goals in Iran,

and we see the push towards that forever. So it's not enough to allow these people to pretend like

they've had a change of heart and are now on the side of right. They got us into this mess on

purpose deliberately, and only were able to do so by silencing those of us, or trying to

discredit those of us who were warning against it the entire time. So again, it's like, I don't know

what it's like to be one of you jackasses that's just wrong about everything all of the time,

but I literally have people in my comments that were wrong about COVID, wrong about lockdowns,

wrong about the 2020 election, wrong about January 6th, which is wrong about everything,

and then condescending to me about, you know, we're going to take their oil, right. Andrew Meyer,

smart dude, typically against war, is in this delusional belief that somehow this is this is

all part of the plan, and we're going to take Iran's oil, and China's going to suffer because of it,

and it's just like, where are you getting this dude? So I don't understand what's going on

in these fuels minds, but I'm going to keep just like trusting in reality and just saying the truth

and just being right about literally everything all of the time, okay. That's where I'm coming from.

And by the way, Iran is on our side, not America's side obviously, but America's side,

absolutely. And I said this right before the Iran war started, so many made a comment about

me and Ayatollah Khameini, and I simply responded, we have all of the same enemies,

I don't know what else to tell you. Who are Khameini's enemies, Benjamin Ehniahu,

guess what? Oh, the American big tech Epstein class? Yeah, no, the friend of the enemy of my enemy

is my friend, and now they're doing a great service for all of us by bombing big tech infrastructure

to smithereens. At least we hope that they'll follow through with this threat. Iran vows to strike

US tech firms in Middle East. And basically they're saying, look, if you're Amazon or Microsoft

or Oracle or Palantir and you're helping to target us, then we're going to destroy your

infrastructure. And I got to wonder how they're going to deal with this because,

I mean, I, you know, so much stuff is on the cloud now. I'm not totally sure of how, like,

you know, backups work in this regard, but if Iran, like, destroys a server farm for Amazon,

is everybody lose their information? Like, is that even recoverable? Like, we have this idea that

you put some on a cloud. It just goes into this sort of permanent infrastructure somewhere.

It's out there somewhere, right? Because there's no such thing as a cloud. It's just somebody

else's computer. So like, what happens if, you know, you've worked with Amazon for a long time,

your entire business is built on their server system to not be eradicated by Iran.

And if that's the case, what does Amazon do about that? How are they ever, like, trusted ever

again? Like, maybe we need to have a, like, major separation between, you know, companies that

service customers and countries that are working as the operating system for the tyrannical,

genocide campaign of the Epstein class. Like, maybe you can do one or you can do the other,

but maybe it's a little bit dangerous to cross-pollinate the two. Now, luckily, you know, Iran,

unlike us, right? We're out there bombing. I think we've bombed like 60 schools at this point.

A bunch of libraries. We've bombed the university in Tehran. Like, we just, you know, are bombing

civilians as a matter of course in our terror campaign. Iran has had the courtesy to warn people.

So, you know, hopefully the employees will be able to get out. I don't want people to die just

because they work for Oracle or whatever. But I would be happy to see their infrastructure eradicated

personally. Am I the crazy one? I mean, they're literally building a cage around us. They're

building a digital panopticon to enslave us. And, I don't know, it seems like at a certain point,

if I get to the point where, you know, kind of like the blade runners in the UK, the gents that

go around and take down cameras and the ULEZ ultra low emission zone surveillance equipment,

like they just go and just physically tear down the infrastructure needed to impose tyranny.

Like, we could get to that point here in America, which also should go into the planning for

the powers that be because they're pouring trillions of dollars into building databases.

Gigantic databases, bigger than you can possibly conceive of. The one in Ohio requires enough

the equivalent power of nine nuclear power plants to run. And it's like, that's all fine and good for

like enslaving people in this digital existence that they want to create for us. But like,

what happens when there's like a dude with bolt cutters who can shut your whole thing down?

Like, what happens when like a little bit of like thermite and bolt cutters are enough

to utterly destroy your entire system? I mean, you can't harden these places really to any

sufficient degree. I know they're building, they're trying to like build some under mountains and

stuff. And yeah, I think that's to protect it from us because it's the infrastructure and the,

you know, physical components of the global slave system. So, hell, if Iran can just take

them out from the air, that would save us a lot of trouble. This is the point we're getting to,

by the way. And there's nothing really worth preserving anymore that I can look at. And I can,

you know, see too, I mean, everything is just getting significantly worse faster. So there's

got to be a break at some point. There's got to be a diversion, a reflection of the trend.

And we'll see when and how that comes, but I think it's overdue. I think it's a long overdue.

And I

am in favor of not voting for Republicans because obviously they're just the worst. They're like

actually worse than the liberal somehow. It's weird, but that seems to be the truth. However,

the idea of accelerationism is historically completely retarded, sorry, to use the word, but

that's the case. All you have to do is look at countries where this has happened.

Just look at South Africa. And people have this idea that's like, well, maybe we just make

everything worse. That'll force people to rise up. Now, absolutely not. Look at South Africa.

There are still liberal progressives in South Africa, a place where over half the population

is entirely dependent on welfare, in which some vanishingly small minority of white people pay

all of the taxes that support everybody else. They're still in a state of absolute collapse.

South Africa, I can show you videos from today. People are just going around knocking down

streetlights to steal the copper out of a phenomenon that we're seeing crop up here in America,

increasing with increasing regularity. There are still, there's still an immigration problem

into South Africa. There are still people from other countries going to South Africa because it

hasn't all been looted yet. So the idea that accelerationism will somehow lead to a

sudden creation of, I don't know, it just doesn't make any sense. It doesn't make any sense.

So I'm not one of these people that's like, we have to vote for Democrats because then people

realize how bad they are. No, like that's stupid. I just think voting for Republicans and expecting

anything different is even stupider. And I think maybe, just maybe, if we stop the Iran war and

put all of our effort and energy into creating a third party or actually genuinely taking over

the reigns of power from the Republican party, but I think that's kind of a dead end operation.

I think we need Joe Kent, Marjorie Taylor Green teaming up with Anacasparian and Rokana.

I think we need to bridge the gap between these two sides to recognize that both sides are

serving the same interests at the end of the day and that we can break free from this.

To help, we have to give up 2028 to truly thoroughly and once for all destroy the Republican party

in order to create something new and better, then that's fine. I'm open to taking extraordinary

steps while there are still some remnant of people that believe in our founding principles

that can take power once the dust is settled. I'm just brought in a bunch of sheets about

Dan Bonjino and Thomas Massey having a back and forth. Should we go, is there worth to go over this?

I mean, do I have to? Like, does anybody have to read this?

Do we do some fortune telling? Can I guess Dan Bonjino is an idiot? Thomas Massey is correct.

I mean, what do we expect to happen here? Is Dan Bonjino going to, is he going to totally expose

Thomas Massey? Do we think that's going to happen? What do we think, class?

Do I, do I, do I, am I supposed to go through this? Is that what's supposed to happen here?

I mean, I can. We just want to see just how right Thomas Massey is, but

we'll save this. I'll save this for a second.

But I guess he does go to sort of what we're talking about and where this goes.

This article from The New York Times, which I'm glad The New York Times is coming out with this

because as ridiculous as it is, Trump at least gives a lot of credence to these old kind of establishment

media outlets. New York Times, of course, would be the premier media outlet. And they,

it's hard to express how kind of damning this article is because it's not like vitriol,

it's not like they're spewing hatred for Republicans. They're just sort of explaining what's

happening at CPAC and how everybody is disillusioned in the Republican Party. So,

again, it's not even like, I don't know how to explain. You always have to read the whole thing,

but it's just you just get this sense of just this wet blanket over everything.

That this person goes to CPAC and it's just like everything's kind of disappointing. It's just

kind of like, you know, he says that the first day of the conservative political action conference

wound to a close, the audience inside the airplane hangar size ballroom had dwindled as Nick

Shirley, the headline speaker, mumbled his remarks. Mr. Shirley, a 23 year old content creator recently

minted right wing celebrity had been tapped by the content creator and recently meant, I'm sorry,

tapped by the conferences organizers to bring a youthful jolt of energy to the proceedings,

but youth themselves and the conservative energy were nowhere to be seen among the rows of empty

chairs. As Mr. Shirley made halting reference to Theodore Roosevelt's man in the arena speech,

just kind of like, oof, oof, it's, and again, the reason I'm saying this is not to like,

you know, crap on Nick Shirley, I think he's great, not to like, celebrate the fact that there's been

this deflation in the conservative movement. It's to point the finger at directly, directly at

the people causing it, the people who are responsible for it. The reason why it's like this is 100%

because of Israel and because of the Jewish influence on the Trump administration. That's it,

that's the reason. You don't need to look anywhere else, folks. It's not complicated, it's not

something you need to debate. It's like very imminently obvious to absolutely everybody

is paying attention. And you can say it shouldn't be that way, but it is. So what are you going to do

about it? It's like, no, but they should be in favor of us going to war with Iran. It's like,

you're going to give it, but we're not. So what are you going to do about it? Are you going to try

to convince us? So far, you don't even have an argument. So far, your only argument has been

to tell us to shut up and get behind Trump because we have to because the Democrats are worse.

I guess, yeah, a little bit, but at least I don't give us false hope. At least, I don't know,

they might actually do something we could benefit from in some way. What do we supposed to say?

You people have destroyed this movement thoroughly and on purpose and by design. Again, it's not

that complicated, folks. Pretty much everybody that joined the Trump administration in 2024,

who he is now serving endlessly and rapidly, like there's no hesitation, if they want something,

they get it. It doesn't matter if it's setting new precedent or in violation of our basic

fundamental principles of free speech, anything like that, it doesn't matter. They get what they want.

And these people are not Republicans and never have been Republicans and do not like the Republican

party and spent their entire lives up till 2024 trying desperately to destroy not just the Republican

party, but everything we believe. And then they join in 2024. So like, just really imagine this.

Really imagine you go to somebody who has been voting Democrat since the 80s, just went over to

Trump and you go to that person, you go, hey, this is destroying the Republican party. What do you

think they're going to be like, oh, no, I don't care. They've been working their whole lives to

destroy the Republican party. They just hadn't figured out the most effective way to do it.

Now they have. Now they have.

Can't destroy America from the outside. So what do you do? You take it from the inside. You commit

it to a possible to win war overseas over and over again until you grind it down into a stump of

its former self. How do you destroy the Republican party? You get elected on a mandate

for mass deportations for eliminating the woke crap and DEI for saving trillions of dollars

from the federal budget. But most importantly, the mass deportations and the arresting of criminals.

And then you take all of that effort and you take all of that victory and you waste it all

deporting college students who write papers about Palestine and then going to war with Iran.

That is the most efficient and effective way to destroy the Republican party, possibly the only way.

And that's what they're doing. It's not sophisticated. It's very blunt how they're doing it.

It's just everybody in the media is in favor of them doing this as well. And so they're

not going to report on it accurately. They're going to report on it in a way that guarantees it

continues. But I mean, this whole article is extremely accurate. Extremely accurate and extremely

kind of depressing, but it more just shows the disconnect and the collapse and the way that

the Republicans really are kind of living in a fantasy world in exactly the same way. The left

was living in a fantasy world under Kamala Harris. And of course, the comparison between last year

and this year is possibly the most illustrated part of it. Last year's meeting struck a triumphant

tone as Elon Musk cranked a chrome chainsaw on stage and President Trump gleefully recounted

the tale of his political comeback. But for the past several years, a younger crowd has declared

the event passé. That's funny for the past several years. But last year was good. But last year,

the energy was high. Elon Musk, Donald Trump, everybody was there and promising to get things done.

We had just won this incredible impossible victory and the world was ours. We had the Congress.

We had the Senate. We had the Supreme Court and the presidency, literally a full house

where we could do anything that we wanted. And absolutely all of it was sacrificed on the

altar of Israel. All of it. Tell me I'm wrong. Point to something that Trump has succeeded at.

And you can make excuses. You can pretend to believe their reasoning. It only ever goes one way.

The mass deportations were far more popular than the Iran war is. They had no problem with that.

Somehow, when it's mass deportations that have a 80% approval rate can't get it done.

It's too politically hot. They can't touch it. We got to scale back too many bad headlines.

But then when it's war with Iran, which has like an 11% approval rating,

we're doing it. We do it. It doesn't matter. All the backlash, all the anger. It's all manage both

fine. It's stupid. They're all stupid. We just don't have to listen to them. Do you understand that

like if we wanted to do any of this stuff? I mean, going back to Harvard is like the best example

for me, where it's like you would even after they force the resignation of the president of Harvard

because you refused to crack down on the free speech of her students. And they came up with

different reasons to claim it was about DEI or she plagiarized something. Obviously, all nonsense.

And it's like for 10 years, Harvard is teaching classes about how to eradicate whiteness,

the evil incumbent in white skin, right, taught by Jewish professors.

We point this out. We're outraged by this. Hey, look, how are you having the premier

university in America teaching things that are just, I mean, it's straight out of a inverted

version of Jim Crow literature. What are we doing here? And we're told like, well, what should we

do? What could we possibly do? It's Harvard. It's just they get to teach whatever they want. We

can't do anything. But the government certainly can't interfere. We have a sacred obligation to

uphold free speech. And glorious Harvard gets to use that however they want. It's like about Harvard's

supporting Palestinians. And it's like, then we have to get rid of their endowment. Then we

withhold billions of dollars and force the change that we want. We demand that the president

step down. And if they don't, then we contact all of the donors to Harvard. And we have them

withdraw support. And we bankrupt them, or they do what we say. They fire the people that we

don't like. They replace them with people that we do like, or we destroy their institution. And

it's like, so you could have done this at any point. So at any point, you had

perfectly available there for your within reach, all the levers you could possibly need to

bring about a change that would actually benefit not just white people that are being viciously

discriminated against not just in the class, but in the matriculation as well.

Can't do it. Refuse to do it won't even broach it. You act stupid. You act ignorant. How could we

possibly? But then the instant that it looks like it might have a minor possibly detrimental effect

to the war aims of Israel. Then all of the sudden, all of these levers are pulled. All of the

pressure is brought to bear and Harvard is forced to bend the knee. That's the situation everywhere.

That's the situation with just about every topic we cover every event we complain about. It's like

imminently solvable. And the very people that will refuse to solve it that will act like it's

impossible to solve will act like it's why we can't set president or we can't we got to be

careful. If we do it to them, they'll do it to us or we're upholding sacred free speech.

They all are just liars. They're just liars and they will immediately do absolutely anything

necessary to achieve whatever they need to for Israel, no matter how tangential it is to the actual

thing happening, right? There's no real actual threat of like Harvard hippies pitching a tent

on Harvard lawn. It doesn't actually affect anything. It's about the symbol and it's about the

total control of these institutions that has to be maintained. It's a supremacy ideology that

does not brook even the slightest deviation, not if they have the power to rain you in and or

destroy your life for opposing them. So I don't even want to get to that level. I'm not I actually

oppose that because these people are tyrannical jackasses. I don't want to do that. I just want

to illustrate to you the absurdity of the claims that well, there's nothing we can do about this

or we're trying our hardest and you know, you review people's needs. You keep voting for

Republicans. It's like show us one Iota one percentage of a percentage of the same care and

effort that you show for foreigners that despise you and maybe we can talk. But until you

even just pretend to be on our side, why the hell would we subject ourselves to your rule willingly?

This is absurd. It's all absurd. And of course, the New York Times gets it, the Democrats get it,

right? They're talking about running just like normal white guys that everybody can get behind.

We don't want any radicals out front, even though they know everybody that they're voting in

votes radical. They at least understand the perception that needs to be maintained.

The Republicans are deliberately retarded, stupid. They're deliberately very stupid, not retarded.

Special needs. They're all very special needs, okay?

After talking with other young attendees at the conference, Mr. Hufses said,

most appeared to be aligned with Mr. Fuentes, who's become a pariah within the conservative

movement. Now hold on. Let me dissect this sentence for you here. Most appear aligned with Mr.

Fuentes, who has become a pariah within the conservative movement.

How could somebody who has the support of most of the people be a pariah? How does that work?

That because there's a small number of people on the top who in a top-down sort of way

are saying that he's a pariah, even though he's immensely popular with all the people,

that is out. I think that's what's happening here. I think I know who.

He's become a pariah in the conservative movement, apparently, even though he has the

overwhelming support of all the people.

Among four, amongst other reasons, his recent declaration the young conservatives should

express their displeasure with Mr. Trump's military strikes on Iran by voting for Democrats.

Quote, I'd say at least 60% of the young people here are fans of Nick. Mr. Hufses said,

the subject of the war in Iran, a source of consternation for many young people in the crowd,

was engaged with lightly on the main stage, and otherwise relegated to exhibition hall gimmicks,

such as gauging support for the conflicts with piles of Pinto beans.

And if this was a righteous war that was going well, would that be the case?

I mean, they're basically trying to ignore the Iran war. It's not like it was a big discussion.

It's not like it was a contentious sort of thing. They just wanted to avoid it, because they know

it doesn't play well, because they know it's ridiculous, because they know any attempt for them to

justify the actions that they're taking are going to be met with widespread scorn. The videos

will probably go viral, and they'll be humiliated as a result. So they'd rather just not talk about it,

which is proof that they know just as well as you and I do that the Iran war is a bad thing,

and it's bad for the Republican Party. I mean, if they actually thought it was a good thing,

they'd be celebrating it, be talking about it constantly. It'd be a main fixture of the

conversation during CPAC. It wasn't because it's bad in every possible way.

So all these people that got us into the war that made the arguments in favor of the war,

that called for Tucker Carlson to be killed because he's not for the war.

People like Josh Hammer, allegedly, I should say, I'm sorry, people who said he should be treated

as like a fox in the hen house because of his opposition to the Iran war. You know, shot with

a shotgun, I guess would be the answer. They didn't make the Iran war a big part of their speeches,

did they? They didn't go out there and say, you're welcome for getting you into this war.

You're welcome for supporting this American imperialism that benefits all of you, great people.

They didn't bring it up because they know everybody hates it.

You'd think everyone's got a cent of the war, they should be proud of it. They should go out

there and give speeches about what a good thing it is, how hard they work to get us into this war.

We know already. I mean, we saw you working continuously trying to get this war.

Now you don't bring it up. Now you don't want to talk about it. Now you don't want to mention it.

Now you just want to call people names like a leftist. All right.

Matt Gaetz, the former congressman from Florida, offered one of the loudest moments of descent

from Mr. Trump in the events official proceedings saying, quote, a ground invasion of Iran will make

our country poorer and less safe. Said Mr. Gaetz, who's now the host of a nightly show on the

conservative one American network. It will mean higher gas prices, higher food prices. And I'm not sure

if we would end up killing more tourists than we would create. That speech, though, drew a muted

response from the crowd and some remained frustrated. These conversations are not happening here.

It said Samantha Kassel, a 27 year old Republican strategist. She was wearing a fishback for Florida hat

in support of the, quote, rage baiting Florida candidate for governor, who's energized a coalition

of young voters in that state, saying there's no serious discussion going on. Like anybody reading

this article, it's impossible to ignore the glaring problems with GOP. It's like, here's we talk to a

young supporter of Nick Fuentes, who's fired up and excited about Nick Fuentes and says all the young

people love Nick Fuentes. And then we watched some speeches from some old school people and the

response was muted. And it was all kind of like embarrassing and cringey. And then we talked to

a fishback supporter and fishback is running an amazing campaign where he's firing up people and

getting hundreds of supporters in obscure locations like waffle houses. He's holding impromptu

events that draw massive crowds and make headlines across the country. And we're keeping him out.

We're gatekeeping him with everything we've got because we don't want the youth to be excited.

We want the youth to be depressed, I guess. So we want to want to demoralize them into thinking

they have to support this war because so far, there's no enthusiastic support. So just demoralization

to the point of helplessness, that's what they're going for now. I feel free to hire me as a

Republican strategist, Republicans. I have these brilliant insights like people that draw a young

energy or the people you should be supporting, okay? Ten million dollars, please.

I mean, is it like, is it not obvious? Is it not readily apparent what the problem is and

it ain't the young people? It ain't the young people, it ain't the young, the youth movement.

It's not the Nick Fuentes or James Fishbacks out there that do draw crowds that do

inspire excitement and passion. The problem is in fact that everybody else at the

conference sees Nick Fuentes and James Fishback as an existential threat to their continued

power and are doing everything they can to silence the most popular and exciting people on the right.

Am I saying things to you that you can't figure out for yourself, really?

Among the young Republicans, there were cases of people expressing forms of cautious optimism

about the coming midterm elections and tentative support for the for the president's abrupt

choice to attack Iran. But these views were expressed for most part by attendees with professional

aspirations to work in GOP circles. Is that not tell you everything you need to know right there?

Everybody who is young, who even tentatively they say moderately,

carefully expresses muted support for some of Trump's what he's doing, it's all because they want

jobs in the GOP power structure. So the GOP power structure is just diametrically opposed to what

the people who vote for the GOP want. And they have it's like this understanding that

if you want to work in the GOP, if you want to move up the ranks of the Republican Party,

if you want to become a person of importance in politics to do something for America, you first

have to submit to Israel. First you have to abandon your principles lie about what you believe,

it's like a shit test, it's like they're testing you, will you lie for us, will you say things

that you know are untrue because they serve our purpose? And if so, you may be welcomed in the ranks

of the scum. I mean just really think about that. And it sucks because right wingers just aren't

deceptive by nature because what could easily happen and Fuentes is doing this to a certain degree

where there are droopers, like everybody understands you actually support

Nick Fuentes, you actually believe in what droopers believe or whatever, you have to hide that,

you have to disguise that, you have to conceal that. But like a lot of people aren't comfortable

doing that, I wouldn't be comfortable doing that. It's like like each your soul away, like you

would become a different person, you did that day in, day out, having this like secret identity,

it shouldn't be necessary. And it's not, it doesn't, it doesn't comport itself with the

fundamental morals of the people who are expected to do this. So it would be easy if like

we were like the leftists who celebrate the fact, like it's actually sort of their official plan

now. The official Democrat plan is to go, hey, let's run people who are pretending to be

reasonable but are in fact radical communists. It's like their official platform at this point.

So they're happy to do this, they're fine doing this. This is why the left always wins

when it comes to, you know, you elect somebody that seems like a moderate Democrat and they turn

out to be a radical. It's because they're happy to play the false part to deceive, to lie about

their true intentions. Republicans right when you don't really want to do that, if we did, it'd be

easy to get into all these, it'd be so easy to go up to any old boomer that runs an organization

and go, I love Israel, I love America, you know, I just, I just really think that Judeo Christian

foundation of our country is collapsing and we have to uphold it against the, the Islamo fascist,

red green alike. It wouldn't be hard at all to trick these people and then get in and then

operate behind the scenes. It's just we're not, you know, morally aligned with that type of strategy.

So we refuse to do it. And it's kind of an impossible ask to be like, hey, you're, you're a

responsible honest truthful Christian young man. Well, the way you need to get powers by becoming

a liar and a deceiver and an undercover operator who's betraying the people who hired you.

It's like we don't want to do that. So we're kind of screwed unless we have actual genuine

like organizers events that are willing to embrace the actual mentality of the people on the ground

and not just work tirelessly to silence or eradicate them, like ostracize them completely.

So I think it was a very good article by New York Times of all places and it ends with a,

you know, poignant but not exactly groundbreaking conclusion. They say,

you know, CPAC's attendees yearn for some of the TPUSA energy, but of course TPUSA was taken

over by Israel. So that's not going to last any much longer. And the last, you know, America

best was a complete disaster as well because they actually allowed some of the, you know,

dissidents to speak. And so it became a big, you know, argument between the power structure that

wants to silence everybody in the, you know, America first people that they're trying to silence.

Ms. Kassel, this young woman, quote, I think MAGA is dying. She said, I do. Oh, good riddance.

All right, folks, Thomas Massey held a money bomb yesterday.

Had a ton of great people contributing to it. And he's come out with a statement today.

He's got a clip number 32 here. This was, I believe this was during the money bomb. This was

about one of the things that the Trump administration is desperately working on. So, okay.

So they haven't gotten any deep state actors. They haven't gotten any justice for

rush a gate or the rush a gate cover up or the bacon peachments into Ukraine or the corruption

around Ukraine or the COVID-19 2020 lockdown scandal, you know, the vaccine poison. None of that's

been handled at all. Obviously, the 2020 election being stolen. That hasn't been dealt with at all.

But don't worry, folks. They're working tirelessly to make sure that the glyphosate producers

can no longer be sued for the immense amounts of cancer that they're giving to everybody.

Let's go to clip 32 here. One of the things in the Farm Bill of still trying to get out of it

was successful in getting this out of prior bills is immunity for a German company called

Bayer that makes glyphosate. This is not to grant farmers immunity. This is to grant the

corporation immunity. If they give farmers contract a form of cancer or non-Hodgerton's lymphoma

from this chemical, if this makes it into the Farm Bill, it won't be able, you won't be able to

sue for that. And I know they're dealing with some similar legislation at the state level.

So, that's what they're doing. That's what they're up to. And of course, Thomas Massey is

tending up against that. And Thomas Massey ratioed the White House significantly with this post.

So, the White House wrote this post that says, only farms, only farms.com.

Thomas Massey responds, can you arrest Epstein's co-conspirators instead of riffing on a porn site?

And yeah, he got about 10 times as many likes as the White House did with

not so much of as the reach that they have.

Again, I mean, you people can just pretend that you're on time. You pretend that you're

the authorities. You can pretend that you're the popular ones. Nobody believes it except for you.

And so, Dan Bungino goes back and forth with Massey. A long story short, Dan Bungino was mad that

Thomas Massey was blowing up the BS that the FBI was feeding us about this supposed pipe

bomber and basically wanted to call Thomas Massey in to try to persuade him not to release

information that would embarrass the FBI. But the funniest part to me is just on every one of Dan

Bungino's. I'll know if it just happened to print out this way, but all of his posts for me include

the first most popular response to him. And everyone is just calling him out hilariously.

And as Thomas Massey and him go back and forth, where basically he's like,

Thomas Massey is just like destroying his points one by one. But then it's like, you know,

Dan Bungino, Thomas Massey is a shameless fraud. Thanks. Have a nice day. First comment from

Dan Blitzerian, you're such a clown, trashing Massey's confirmation of your treason. He says

something else about Thomas Massey. The first response says the guy who talked to big gain,

but was completely bought by your big nose handlers as soon as you got into office from a former

supporter of Hugo F yourself. You let everybody but Israel down.

Dan Bungino tries to get creative with it. And it's like, did Thomas Massey ever accept

the invite to be briefed about the cases he's bloving, bloviating about? No, of course he didn't.

He prefers to rage bait and litigating criminal matters on ex for clout. Ask him if you're bored.

He chose to be stupid. Fact 100 100 emoji. The first response to top response to that post is

quote, it's clear that you and your handlers are in a frenzy after seeing Massey's wildly successful

fundraiser yesterday. Meanwhile, you interviewed his puppet opponent who won't even agree to a debate.

This is Faga, which I think is kind of creative. Fake America again. Like fake America grade

again, something like that. Faga. Bunch of. And finally, Dan Bungino says PS,

another other representatives who had questions took the brief, not Massey. He prefers ignorance

in the top response to that quote, did the pedophiles you protect take the brief?

Did they take the brief Dan Bungino? The pedophile criminals that you are ruining your own

reputation to protect? Did they take the brief? That way you love them so much.

You know, we're not MAGA. We're not MAGA. We're Faga. Just a

plus bag heads, I guess you'd call us. I have so many more videos to show you. I don't even know

if I'm going to have time to take calls this hour. I want you just sitting online waiting for me

to go to you. So we'll hold off on taking calls for a minute because I got a lot of good videos.

Got a lot of good videos. I also need to tell you about zero light, zero light detox and

defense available now at the Alex Jones store.com, the Alex Jones store.com slash Harrison. If you

want to let them know who sent you, it is a powerful liquid formula with ultra fine zero light

designed to help bind heavy metals and environmental toxins, support your body's natural detox pathways

and promote daily wellness. And right now if you sign up for a subscription where you get zero light

delivered monthly, you're getting 72% off 72% off this very, very powerful supplement.

And you'll always get you'll always get delivered even when we run out. Otherwise, we'll always

save some for you. We're almost at the 1000 subscriber limit. And once we hit that, the price jumps

back up to the full price. But you're getting 62% off subscription price for zero light.

And it just fits into the entire methodology here at Info Wars. We've never been

the doomers, right? You can find them. There's a lot of people out there that will just tell you

all hope is lost and everything's going down the world's going to be destroyed. We tell you that

is the intention. That's what they're trying desperately to do, but that they have to

contend with human will and that if you organize and if you exert your will and if you recognize

that you are just as powerful as them, then we can defeat them and we can win and we can embrace

humanity and reach for the stars. We can actually do this stuff. Same in the same way, like we'll tell

you about the poison in the food and waters will also give you water filters that deals with the

problem because there's always been a true a two track response from Info Wars, the individual

and the societal communal, right? We have to pass laws to get things like fluoride out of our

water. At the same time until that happens, you got to be filtering your own. We want heavy

metals out of our soil, heavy metals out of our air, heavy metals out of our food and water,

until then you might want to be taken zero light. You got to do both these things. It's not one or

the other and one is not sufficient, but you got to do at least one. Really, we should be doing both.

We're not just telling you about the environmental toxins that are poisoning us on purpose

and by design with desired outcomes of lowering testosterone, lowering fertility,

creating a helpless class of the disabled who pose no threat to those in power.

We have to get that stuff out at the same time until that happens. You're still being poisoned

and you still got to do something about it. I know this is a product. I've looked for a similar

product like this. Could you hear about all the heavy metals? There's got to be something I can do.

Well, zero light is the detox program that you need. Incredible absorption. It's got a very advanced

binding agent and can help you detox in the way that the modern world calls for. Go to the

Alexandre store.com slash Harrison if you want to let them know who sent you. Of course,

go now to get the 72% off once we're out of that initial stock. That sale is going to end.

So it's still going on now as far as we know. Go make the order if you can. Now, like I said,

I've got some longer videos to show you. Let's start with should we reset? Should we do a

little reset for the third hour? Have some fun. Let's go to clip number 38. There was a very

interesting occurrence over the weekend. We haven't even talked about the no Kings rally.

And it was kind of bizarre. You would think one would surmise that if you really were against

Trump, you've been holding these no Kings rallies over and over. Sometimes they're bigger,

sometimes they're smaller, but you've got this big one coming up. And on the approach to the

no Kings rally, Trump goes to war with Iran and it's hugely unpopular and people hate it.

And they're infuriated by it. If you're the organizer of the no king rally,

do you not make it into an anti-Iran war rally? Do you not say, hey guys, if you're against this war,

you got to come to the no Kings rally because that's where standing up against. King Trump,

things he can get us into a war anywhere overseas. And we just have to go along with it. We're

standing up and telling him, no, wouldn't you take that tack? This is the two party control

system I'm talking about. The Republicans know perfectly well what they should do if they wanted

to be elected, if they wanted to inspire their base, capture the youth. They know what they need

to do. They won't do it because it's contrary to what their actual goals are. Same thing with the

Democrats. If they wanted the no Kings rally to be the biggest event in the history of America,

they would have said, this is an anti-Iran war rally and they would have had, I would have gone.

It would have had a lot of people who went. Now because we believe in what the no Kings people

believe, they're all radical left as socialist morons, but they're also in favor of the war in Iran.

I would have gone if they'd been against the war in Iran, but they aren't. Now they're for it,

they're in favor of it. Isn't that kind of weird? Doesn't that seem kind of strange to you?

They wouldn't take this massive vulnerability that Trump has now exposed himself to,

and you don't take that opportunity because to them, if there was the two-button option and they

could get rid of Trump and have a socialist utopia or make Israel a superpower, they hit that

last button. That's the one they actually care about. Using leftist outrage about Trump is a

convenient way to gain power to achieve that ultimate goal, totally at odds and possibly

dimensionally opposed to what the left is actually believe, but it doesn't matter to them.

That's the path to power. That's what they're going to use and achieve. We got some videos from

the no Kings protest. Again, it could have been big. It could have been incredible. It could have

been really a monumental thing. It wasn't, though, because the people controlling it are

essentially leftist neocons. It's really the way to think about them. They are the left wing

of the neocons, which is to say they're neocons because the neocons are left wing too. Let's go

to clip 38 here. This was a brilliant interaction between a troll and I guess another troll. Let's watch.

Isn't it a little bit homophobic that was so focused on the straights of homu's and not the

gaze of homu's? I agree. Yes, for sure. Why do you think they're willing to leave the gaze of

homu's behind? I think it's just, um, history, historically, like, you know, gaze have always been

very discriminated against, which is wrong. I'm so many levels. Even in war. Yeah, even in war,

it just takes more reform in government, obviously, and then also educating society.

Just feel like if we're going to go inside, we can't leave the gate. I don't think we should

go inside at all, but if we're going to the gaze of homu's, we could turn it into fire island.

For sure. Down to any leftist that may have been maybe mistakenly watching me right now.

That's what you all sound like to us all the time, just so you know, just so you're aware.

Like, I know because it's the straight-of-form moves and the gaze of

homu's, like, it's kind of an obvious plan. Words that was designed to troll her and make her

look stupid, but that's she's about as on the ball as any of you people on any topic, really.

So I just want you to understand, like, that's how we see all of you all of the time.

All right, that was not a unique, uniquely embarrassing moment.

That's what all of your beliefs essentially boil down to is like, yeah, why can't

Carg Island be the new fire island? Like, what are you even talking about?

What are we saying here? You people are off the reservation, and yet

extremely confident in your beliefs, which is a very, very dangerous combination.

Now I want to go to clip 23 here.

This seems real to me. I can't, I kind of don't believe that it's real.

I don't think it's real, but it's very funny. It's very well done, and it almost seems real.

Let's go to clip 23 here. Just before we get into the real

hellish nuclear war stuff, let's laugh a little bit more at this person trying to outwoke

their HR person at work. Let's watch.

The picture in our last talk, and I think it's going to save us, true?

Okay. But, you know, looking at the bigger picture of the...

Oh, I don't know if you can say the B word.

Yeah, you know, big. It's just like a lot of history behind that.

Like, the proud activist Lizzo, she like worked tirelessly to like, kind of like,

de-platformize that word. Yeah, so yeah, so maybe use like substantial.

Yeah, just circling back to this. I don't know if you can use the shape circle.

It's again, like, triggering to a lot of, you know, people, like, even like,

come on, like, people aren't shapes. Like, let's not use shapes. Let's abandon shapes.

You're right. Yeah, yeah. You're teaching me things every single day.

Well, thank you so much. But, yeah, I also wanted to say, um, thank you for like, seeing this,

and, you know, overlooking this. Oh, I don't know if you can use overlooking,

because, you know, again, back to the whole blind people, like, they don't really,

like, they don't like less appropriating, you know, that, yeah, using that technology,

I'm gonna keep this in mind. And, yeah, thank you so much.

Thank you. So can I go back to my lunch now?

Yeah, it's okay. Thank you for having me.

I don't know if it's real, but it's very convincing. It's very realistic. If nothing else,

it's just like, yeah, this is y'all's ideology, man.

And look, if you want to get man-handled by a NYPD cop, there's easier ways to do it than

dress up like Lady Liberty, okay? There's easier ways to fulfill your, your deep, deep desire to

be man-handled by an Aryan, but whatever you got to do, whatever you got to do, Lady.

All right. Well, that's enough fun. Should we get into the horror? Should we get into the

hellish horror of the real world? I'm gonna clip 31 here, Colorado. I started out to be one of

the most disappointing states in my lifetime. Used to be, used to be kind of great, actually.

Used to be almost entirely conservative, except for little pockets of the elite in places like

Aspen. Not so much anymore. I think it all went downhill when they legalized weed, to be honest

with you, but of course, can't legalize weed without being infected in the first place.

It's basically California 2.0 at this point, which is very sad. It's going to clip 31. They have

just passed a new law or trying to pass a new law to take your children away for pretty arbitrary

reasons. Let's watch. Colorado's been in the news a lot, even today with a ruling out from the

US Supreme Court saying the Colorado once again violated the free speech and religious liberty rights

of its citizens. Well, there's a bill that's going to be heard in House Committee today, HB26309,

that if you're a parent, you need to listen to this, you need to know what is being considered

by the state of Colorado to take away your rights with your child. Now, this bill would specifically

apply in situations where parents are getting custody of their child. So like divorce proceedings

or, you know, whenever a child custody agreement is being re-looked at. So this doesn't apply

right now to every single parent out there. You would actually have to be in a custody-type situation.

But since a lot of parents do find themselves in those situations, this bill is very, very threatening

to parental rights. And I would argue, as an attorney myself, unconstitutional as written. But you

need to know about it. Here's what it does. It gives a very broad definition of coercive control.

And it makes coercive control fit under the definition of domestic abuse or domestic violence

in Colorado. And what this law says is that if you have committed domestic violence, then there's

going to be a presumption that you should not see your kids and you should not get custody of

your children. In some order to find whether or not you've committed domestic violence against

your child, they look at this broad definition of coercive control. So I'm going to read part of it

to you. The first part is fine. It's talking about actual abuse. But then it gets into the bad part.

Coursive control, and I'm quoting now, includes a pattern of behavior that takes away the

individual's liberty or freedom and strips away the individual's sense of self, including the

individual's bodily integrity and human rights. Coursive control includes isolating the individual

from support, exploiting the individual, depriving the individual of independence, and regulating

the individual's everyday behavior. And then it actually goes on and gives an entire long list of

other things that could be considered coercive control. Now, here's the problem. That's an extremely

broad definition. Think about as a parent, if you are depriving your child of independence,

like, what does that mean? That could literally mean you are tracking your child through the

find my phone app, and you're tracking their location to make sure they are where they told you

they would be, or that they are at a safe place where you dropped them off for sports or for a class.

It could also mean if you have supervision over your child's banking account and they're a minor,

so you can actually shut off their access to their funds, because maybe they're spending it

irresponsibly, or it's part of a grounding punishment that you've given them. Well, that is

depriving them of independence, regulating the individual's everyday behavior. I mean, come on,

what parents actually do. Of course, we regulate our child's everyday behavior. We tell them they

have to go to school. That's infringing on their independence. We tell them which friends are

good for them and which aren't, because that's our responsibility as a parent. It is not domestic

violence. And so, in addition to the fact that this is so broad, it could literally take a child

away from any parent in a custody situation for any reason whatsoever. It also removes the

seriousness of actual domestic violence, where children are actually being abused and should not

be put with that parent. This degrades and takes away the seriousness of real offenses like that.

One of the other things that it defines as coercive control is, quote, monitoring, surveilling,

regulating, or controlling the individuals, activities, communications, or movements,

including through technology. So, that's where you get the using apps to track your child's location,

or also, you know, their finances telling them what they can spend money on and what they can't.

There's also parts of this bill that would prohibit a parent from stopping their child from

transitioning into a different gender or taking medications. It would also prevent

a dad from discouraging, you know, his daughter from having an abortion. Like, there's so many

limitations on what a parent can even say to their child or help them in their lives or act in

their best interest. This is a terrible bill. It absolutely needs to be shut down.

And of course, there's, I mean, she lays out there and I don't, there's no argument against this.

I mean, the only reason you would promote something like this is because you're trying to

basically capture ideological control of young people. It's absolutely the only reason because

it'll never, it'll never go the other way, right? And this comes into things like the Supreme Court

decision yesterday, where actually, surprisingly, it was an eight to one decision,

Kentangi Brown Jackson, again, of course, the only dissenting voice. It really seems like she

doesn't understand her role as a Supreme Court judge. Honestly, it seems like she thinks that

it's just her opinion that they're asking for. Like, the point of the Supreme Court,

it's point of the point of appointing people to the Supreme Court. There's supposed to be

unbiased arbiters of the law. They're supposed to just look at the law and decide what the law

says. It's not supposed to have anything to do with their personal proclivities. I genuinely don't

know if Kentangi Brown Jackson knows that because she seems to be answering all of the questions

put to the Supreme Court, just with her own personal perspective, her own personal opinion.

Like, we don't care if you think that there should be conversion therapy. The question is,

is it legal or is the law banning it violating the First Amendment? I really don't think she

understands that that's the case. And like, I don't think leftists understand this either.

They don't really seem to have much grasp of like the rule of law, what that actually means.

But it's obvious that bands against conversion therapy are not constitutional because you don't

ban them the other way. Explain this literally for years. But it's really not that complicated.

They're banning, quote, unquote, conversion therapy, which actually means anybody just trying to

counsel young people about their sexuality and trying to get them to conform their sexual activity

in line with a more responsible or decent, honorable sort of way. Or however you perceive that.

While at the same time, they're like putting into the class plan deliberate indoctrination

into an LGBTQ lifestyle. So you can ban both or you can ban neither. But if you're just

banning one and enforcing the other, then all you're doing is establishing essentially a state

religion, an ideology that's pushed by the state. And if you oppose that ideology,

you're to be punished and the state is supposed to like clamp down on that expression.

Obviously that's out of lines of the First Amendment. Everybody except for

Kintanji Brown Jackson on the Supreme Court recognized that and decided correctly. So the Supreme

Court ruled eight to one against a Colorado law banning conversion therapy for LGBTQ minors,

finding that it violates the First Amendment. Kintanji Brown Jackson was the loan to center.

I don't think anybody has explained to her what her actual job is yet.

And that gives us two things like what happened to this Chicago Bulls player who has been

removed from the team because of his outrageous statements. And it was funny because I was reading

about this for a while before I ever actually saw the video. I don't know if you all have seen

this video, but I was expecting something, I think I was expecting something else.

For Chicago Bulls, Christianity is a fireable offense, but not drugs or resisting arrest.

I mean, the NBA is replete is, I mean, it's full of people like the most outrageous criminals

you can imagine. They're a rape as their, I actually saw opposed by an NBA player condemning

this guy, Jaden. The guy making the post had been in a scandal like two years ago because he

was dating an underage girl. So like you have like literal pedophiles, literal like

statutory rapists, actual rapists, domestic, you know, violence committers. That's all fine.

But this guy, this Jaden character, he took it too far and the Chicago Bulls, they just can't

stand for that. And let's go to a, I'm going to clip 12 here. Let's see what this guy has to say

about it. It's Mike Ravel, I guess. Let's watch.

Conduct detrimental to the team, which is why the Bulls released the player in their view and

allowing the 23 year old to, you know, express his personal feelings. I think there is a

final I want to tell you, I love Travia. I love the person. He cares deeply about our team. He

cares deeply about his faith. He cares deeply about his family, his wife, the people in our building.

And so I want them to be able to express what they believe in their heart and in their mind.

But, but also want to make sure that they're educated and we want to be inclusive. We want to,

everything we want to do wants to provide an environment for people to want to feel comfortable,

but also to share their personal beliefs. And then also we represent the team and we represent

the organization. Yeah, totally. So that's why you fired the guy for expressing himself.

Yeah, you know, you just, you just fired a guy for, and I'll show you the clip on the other side,

we got to go to commercial break. But this is so, I feel like it's so emblematic of the modern

world where they're like, you fired somebody for expressing a very boilerplate religious belief.

You fired somebody for merely stating essentially that they're a Christian. And the response is,

yeah, because we want to be inclusive. Oh, okay. Cool.

And do you understand? Like, that's, that's all you need to know. Why'd you fire the Christian?

Oh, because we want to be inclusive of everybody. We want everybody to feel comfortable expressing

themselves. So we fired the guy who expressed himself. Wait to hear what the guy actually said,

what you got fired for the borderline. Yes, folks, the Chicago Bulls fired a player

for expressing his Christian opposition to participating in an LGBTQ program.

And so they fired him because they care so much about inclusivity. They care so much about

inclusivity. They're firing people that disagree with them. Maybe have a different perspective.

See, you have to wear the Black Lives Matter Jersey. You have to wear the rainbow jersey.

You have to celebrate pride. And if not, you're not being inclusive.

Everybody has to agree on this. Anybody that doesn't isn't being inclusive and will be excluded,

okay? Just, just laying out how little sense this makes on the face of it, but obviously,

they don't care about inclusion. I don't know if I need to tell you this. They don't care about

inclusion. They care about submission. They care about cohesion, pushing their beliefs,

pushing their morality, their mentality, their moral system on everybody else. And if you

oppose it, you're the bad guy because you're not being inclusive. I don't think I need to hammer

that home. I think it's just, just should be obvious to everybody. And this is kind of the

frustration I feel on a daily basis. Everything our enemies believe is self-contradictory.

And it's absurd that I even have to explain it. It makes me feel crazy because of all the people

online that start like either pretending to go along with this or genuinely don't have the IQ

to figure out that it's incoherent. And then obviously a lie. Stories at Info Wars,

Jayden Ivy, a former player of the NBA's Chicago Bulls, was let go by the team on Monday.

After he criticized the league's Pride Month celebrations as unrighteous,

according to his Christian faith. Again, like I said, it's like I got fired.

Nobody's really standing up for him. There are some, the headline from Info Wars is Christian

athletes come to defensive NBA player, fired for criticizing league's Pride Month events.

But not really like his teammates have all kind of made these like half-ass statements where they're

like, well, he feels really strongly about what he believes. But like, you know, I can't really say

much more. It's just like you pathetic cowards. All these people are just slaves. They're all

just willing slaves. The Chicago Bulls announced on Monday in a Monday statement. The quote,

team has waved, guard Jayden Ivy due to conduct detrimental to the team. And beat his wife.

He'd be, you know, first pick. Didn't rape anybody. That'd be covered up, right? He's not like

LeBron James, who published after a girl, a black girl was almost killed by another black girl

with a knife only for the attack to be halted. Moments before was able to be carried out by a white

cop. He posted a picture of that white cop saying, you're next. So okay, LeBron James can blatantly

threaten an American cop for doing his job and saving the life of a black woman.

Again, did nothing make sense in any of this, but this is what happens when you have no shared

morals, no, you know, widely understood, established, you know, basis of morality. You're next

accountability. I'm pretty sure if I'm not mistaken, scroll down a little bit. I'm pretty sure

this was the cop. Y'all remember this. It was one of the craziest events. It was right after George

Floyd. I think it was in the same like area as George Floyd, like, you know, Minneapolis somewhere

around there. And there was a video that the body cam footage came out there released it really

quick because basically a black girl had been shot by police. And I was like, oh my god, another

one, another black girl shot by police. Oh my god. And then they released the body cam footage.

And it was literally like an action movie, like, you know, those action movie moments where like

the bad guy like pulls back the knife and is about to stab. And then the good guy shoots him in

the chest. And he like, you know, it's like, it was like that close. Like literally this girl has a

knife. She's pulling it back and stabbing at another girl about to like kill that other girl.

And the cops shooter literally in the last microsecond they could have saved the other girl's

life, put down the threat. LeBron James gets on line shows picture of the hero cop and says,

you're next. Cause they wanted him to prison for five years, like they did to the guy, the police

officer that was standing near Derek Chauvin, the Asian guy. That was a crazy time. And that was

a crazy instance. It was literally, it was like, you can debate certain, you know, did he overdose?

Was it, I mean, you know, I think we all know the answer, but at least there was some wiggle room,

some debate there. But that the event of the stabbing, I mean, it was literally this girl had a knife

lunging at the other girl and she gets shot and people still wanted to pretend like this was a,

you know, unwarranted shooting. Crazy. So, but that's fine. That's fine. LeBron James can literally

threaten the life of a cop who just saved the life of a black girl. That's all fine and good. And

he's the best in the hero and, you know, he'll be on all of the serial boxes.

But Jayden Ivy, he went too far. He went too far and he said stuff that just the, you know,

it would bring down the Chicago Bulls completely. Is this it? The crew found it?

Do you all remember this video? Let's see if it's as if it's, if it is as perfect as I remember.

And if this is the right one, because the one I remember, I mean, you can literally see her

with the knife about to stab when she gets shot. I'm not sure if this is it. Is this it?

Maybe I can't say it on the, my screen's not exactly right.

Yeah. And I'll, I hope, please officer, was cleared in the shooting of teenager Makaya Bryant.

You know, cleared the instant that it happened because it was on video. There it is. Yeah,

there's the knife. She's got the knife. She's about to stab this girl in the pink, right?

With the knife, I don't know if you've ever been stabbed by a knife before, but it hurts.

It can kill you very easily. So what should this cop have done? Allow it to happen.

So he's not racist. Come on, ridiculous. Okay, this is all background. Just a little reminder,

a case you need to remember how special needs this whole thing has been the whole time.

So apparently he's put out a couple of videos, but I don't think this is, I don't think any of them are

you know worse than the one I'm about to show you. So you know, just be warned. Okay.

Be warned. I know the NBA literally famous for being the most like degenerates come back

in the world. But finally, one of them has gone too far. We're going to go to clip 19 here.

I don't want to sarcastically say it because sometimes I really do sell you like,

hey, parental warning. You don't want to watch this. I was going to say it jokingly because

there's absolutely nothing even remotely offensive about what you're about to see.

But I was going to play it up like that. But I'm not going to do that. Sometimes I really do tell

you like a parent discretion advice advised. This is not one of those cases, but like,

that's how they want you to think of it. They want you to think that what you're about to see

is something that like if the Chicago Bulls were to be associated with something like this,

I mean, my God. They they they'd stop selling uniforms or stop selling merchandise.

The stadium would be empty. I mean, if it was known that Chicago Bulls have this type of mindset.

I mean, how could they survive as a as an organization? They had to fire this guy for the,

you know, stability of the whole team. Let's go to clip number 19. This is the just incredibly

offensive way over the line stuff that this homophobic moron said. Let's watch.

The world can proclaim LGBTQ.

Right. They have they have they proclaim pride month and the NBA.

They proclaim it. They they show it to the world.

They say come come come join us for pride for pride month to celebrate unrighteousness.

They proclaim it.

They proclaim it on the billboards. They proclaim it in the streets. Unrighteousness.

So how is it that that one can't speak righteousness? How is it one that how how how are they to say that?

You you man this man is crazy. I'm not I'm not sure the jail used to be put the OJs dead.

I'm not a lot of Christ. No matter what the basketball setting is, you know, I'm born again,

the Holy Spirit. I'm not gonna say about Jesus Christ. No matter what how many DNPs I don't

I don't get to play or no matter how many points I scored, those things are a temporary thing.

So there you go. Riley Gaines. We live in a world that hates Christ and those who believe in him,

but that's to be expected just as he was persecuted. So we will be consider me a Jaden Ivy fan.

Jaden Ivy reposted that. So that was it. That was the video. He literally just called pride unrighteous.

A couple things about this. For one, I can pretty much guarantee you at least half of the players

in the NBA totally agree with that. At least at least half the players on his team,

if you were to get me to get him in the locker room, what do you think about Gaines? You'd hear

some stuff, right? I guarantee you. I mean, if you ever talk to black people, I mean, it's like

it's a weird kind of thing because they actually have a higher percentage number of LGBT members

in the black community, but they also are like way more hardcore about not being LGBTQ.

I don't know. This is a cultural thing you may not be aware of. So it's ridiculous to act like

this is a unique point of view. I mean, they aren't even trying to like claim it's hateful, but

that's only because they can't because he didn't actually say anything. He literally said it was

unrighteous, which the funny thing is if you ask the pride people ask, you know, people they're

out there on Pride Parades, ask if what they're doing is righteous in the conception that a

Christian would have. They all know it's unrighteous. They're not there pretending that this is a

righteous. They know what they're doing. It's ridiculous. Yeah, Chicago Bulls host pride night

in partnership with BMO Harris Bank. All right, so this guy was fired for being for literally

being a Christian. And then like all this teammates are like, I hope he gets the help he needs,

the help he needs, the help he needs is his teammates not throwing him under the bus. The help

that he needs is for his teammates to say, hey, you're gonna fire him. I think what he thought,

fire me too. If literally one other person from the team said that, it would probably have a

major effect. If two people said it, they'd have to really think about it. They'd have to really

think this worth losing three of our best players, but they're all cowards. They're all absolutely

pathetic cowards, honestly. I don't, I can't possibly fathom the level of sort of quizzling

fear these guys operate in. God bless, Jaden ivy for standing up against it. But then to act

like this guy's crazy, he's crazy. He's on well. He needs help. That's the

psychiatric vocabulary coming into play. As if you recognizing the clear misalignment between

the LGBTQ lifestyle and general wholesome, you know, positive productive family structures,

you have to be, you must be crazy. You must be insane. He's shocked therapy. You might need

medication. That's where this is going. But there's another thing. The video that we saw in the last

segment of the coach, basically saying, yeah, look, you know, he needs, he needs to get help. And

what he actually said is we want to be inclusive. Okay, but you just fired the guy for saying his

belief. But we want people he says to be informed and to be like educated on this stuff.

And I'm explaining this many times to you, this is the psychological manipulation behind things

like homophobia or Islamophobia. They say it's a phobia because phobia implies fear, fear implies

ignorance. You're afraid of things you don't understand. You're afraid of things that you

know are out there, but you don't know what it is, right? You're afraid of the dark because you

don't know what could be in the dark. So if you're afraid of homosexuality, must be because you're

uneducated, you're uninformed. It's setting up a paradigm, a false paradigm, a false dichotomy that

says you're either educated and informed and you understand homosexuality and you are therefore

in favor of it or you're ignorant, you're naive and hateful. And that's why you're against it.

The false dichotomy precludes the position that Jade Nivey's in in which he understands homosexuality.

He gets homosexuality. He's not afraid of homosexuality, but he's not in favor of it.

In their world, construction, you can't not be in favor of it and understand it. If you're not in

favor of it, it must be because you haven't been educated enough. And what they mean by that is

you haven't been educated enough to understand that you need to sublimate your own beliefs

under the demands of the corporation. That's all the other players understand.

Like I said, all the other players ask them, hook them up to a lie detector. I guarantee you,

at least half of them agree with Ivy. What they don't understand is that they need to shut up

about that, keep their job. I guess they do understand that. They understand that they need to

not express themselves. They want to keep their job. See, there's so much smarter than Ivy,

the idiot who actually says what he believes and stands up against the deliberate destruction of our

moral foundation here in America. So he's great. Everybody else in the NBA is absolute trash. They're all

quizzling cowards or just anti-Christ owners of the organizations who trade black people like slaves

and have no respect for them and demand they keep themselves silent for the continuation of the

destruction of the Western world. Now, speaking of the destruction of the Western world,

a lot of people are looking at the situation in Iran and recognizing that we are in

very dangerous landscape for the use of nuclear weapons. And we seem to be racing towards

a catastrophe in which nuclear weapons would be a very easy,

you know, final solution for life, a better word for the people that have embroiled us in this.

So how would this come about? How would this happen? And how would we prevent it? Well,

the good news is that all of the bad guys are actually good guys. It turns out

and may actually rain in the real bad guys who control our country and Israel and are in fact one

in the same. Let's go to clip number 36 and 37. We'll play both these back-to-back because this

is Voldemort Zelensky talking about Israel and his, again, it's just like you cannot find

him more comically evil villain than little rat Zelensky with his Disney villain voice. You'll hear

it here. It seems like he is making an offer to Israel because Ukraine has a lot of experience

in drone warfare over the last couple of years. And he's offering a deal to Israel.

Yeah, Zelensky touched the wall, are we surprised? He is literally surrounded

by Israeli criminals. Like his entire cabinet literally got caught stealing $100 million

fled to Israel, all at like four or five of them. The Ukraine war is being waged by a faction of

Israelis, just a war aware. And it's probably all in service of what's happening in Iran anyway,

if you really get right down to it, or at least the sex trafficking that takes place on a industrial

scale from Ukraine and other Eastern European countries into Israel. Look into that if you have

spare time and want to throw up. So this seems like Zelensky at crux if Ukrainian corruption case

said to a fled Israel. That's one of them. There's like at least three I can think of. But regardless,

he seems to be in negotiations in a way with Israel, perhaps a quid pro quo situation,

he'll help Israel defeat Iran's drones in exchange for nuclear weapons. You tell me if you think

that's what he's hinting at in these interview clips.

We gave several signals to Israel from the beginning of this war. We had big

deficit with some things. We need them. We still need them. It's such history. It's never enough.

But we don't know. Maybe maybe there's something else that I need. I have what he needs. He has what

I need. Okay, so you're going to offer to help him with the drone warfare in exchange you want

a nuke to go after Russia. I mean, he's been trying to get a nuke for a while. They really want

to obliterate Russia completely because it's a good Christian nation of white people. It's not going

along with the suicide of the Western nations. So what happens if Zelensky gets his hands on a nuke

or these rallies decide to go nuclear or help America might decide to use a nuke because

I don't know. Mark Levin talks to Trump for 30 minutes. It's like what would happen in that

situation? Well, an official, supposedly official from China has come out to say that

no one's certain terms. If Israel uses a nuke, China will get involved. Let's just say that.

Good to clip 25 here. Again, this is a supposedly Chinese official in the Communist Party

responding to the question about nuclear war in the Middle East, clip 25.

First of all, I want to tell the Israeli government and the Israeli leaders at the moment Israel

uses a nuclear warhead against any other country, including against Iran. It will be the device

of Israel as a country, as a state.

ostensibly saying all the right things to get elected. We elected them. They endlessly serve

foreigners and opponents to us and bending over backwards. They can't even

denaturalize or deport Kilmara, Brego Garcia of all people. We just can't get anything done.

Not all. What we are doing is destroying the first amendment because of anti-Semitism,

where deporting people on the basis of their support or lack of support for Israel,

we're going to war in Iran. At the same time, giving all of government control over to

Palantir, as now the Pentagon is on a Palantir platform, the IRS just asked Palantir to join.

So all of the worst parts of our government are all now being platformed onto Palantir.

Like, everything the American government is doing, everything the Israeli government is doing

is diametrically opposed to everything I want to happen.

And is in just abject opposition to everything I think should be going on. Meanwhile,

Iran is saying they're going to bomb Oracle and Palantir databases. China is saying

if Israel uses a nuclear weapon, we're going to eradicate them. Like, what's going on here?

What's going on? I'm not a communist. I'm not a radical Muslim. But our countries have been

taken over by a fanatical death cult. And we're the bad guys at the end of the day.

And the sad thing is there are European countries that are standing up against this,

but like I said, they're all the worst. So like, I don't know what we have to do

to bridge this gap. I have got stories today. I mean,

Maloney, the Israeli Italian Prime Minister has basically said, we're going to sanction Israel.

This is absolutely unacceptable, it's happening in Lebanon. France has said they're not cooperating

with Israel anymore. They're not getting any weapons from them. They're sanctioning them.

Spain has gone farther than just about anybody. Now, all of these countries making these

statements are also engaged in the suicidal behavior that the left demands, the climate change

crap, the anti-white people crap. You have stuff like this. Mark Karney of all people,

Mark Karney, Prime Minister of Canada, former Bank of England scumbag, architect of the lockdown

for COVID, Karney condemns Israel's illegal invasion of Lebanon as Operation Expans.

Like, all I want is somebody and just tell me if this is possible, a politician out there,

there's got to be a couple out there that can both oppose the vicious and brutal dehumanization

and ethnic cleansing carried out by Israel and is also not fanatically engaged in globalization

and eradicating the white race and destroying quote unquote capitalism so they can install communism.

Like, can we have both of these? Is this impossible? It's like, okay, they'll be against Israel,

but they're retarded socialists that want to destroy the country that they rule, okay? Great.

Or, hey, they're a patriot, they love America, but actually everything they ever do is dedicated

entirely to Israel and it's like, how did these two things become the options and how do we bridge

this gap or destroy this paradigm because it's unsustainable.