
About this episode
Get every episode summarized
Each time Podcast Patapoe publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
794 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Podcast Patapoe — 20260910-1100. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
building collapsed and took a lot of power with it and wound up not being on the air that night or the week after. And yeah, it was a bizarre day. Let's go it that way. But something that has affected us every day since. Of course, we've had multiple wars since then. We've had all kinds of civil rights trampled upon. We've just had a downward spiral. I don't think the other way to describe it. And now, you know, what we're looking at today, we are looking at such ignorance that there is a real push to keep Mayor Marnadani out of the September 11th ceremonies because he's Muslim. I mean, there's no other reason if someone has a read or maybe socialist, well, we don't allow socialists to go to ceremonies.
You have idiots like the former governor of Bataki and super idiots like former Mayor Giuliani. So I'm going on to this petition. You have Ted Cruz in Texas giving his opinion that nobody asked for. And you just have this atmosphere of hatred and ignorance. And I am just fed up with it. I am fed up with this. We deserve so much better. We work so hard to get so much better. And look at us 25 years later in a world that is more intolerant, more filled with hatred and ignorance. I mean, Germany is welcoming back the Nazis. Wonderful. And all kinds of horrible things are happening. How testers are massing an England against immigrants. You have a war criminal in Serbia being celebrated as a hero as he's buried. You know, I could go on and on. It's just really, really discouraging.
And I hope that we can have an uplifting conversation as far as hoping to do tonight. I have an uplifting conversation with those of us who showed up. So I don't know. Yeah, I'm wondering like does the current state of affairs influence how we're looking at 2001? I'm really curious because at the time and in the intervening time, there's these things like calls for unity and all of that. Here we have like complete DMZs. You know, we're completely split across party lines. There's so much keeping people apart whether you're talking about information bubbles or silos where people just don't really, they're lacking information. You know, they're or they're being told lies and believing them because they're aligned with things that they, other subjects they agree with.
And I'm really not as curious about recalling where I was that moment. We've done that years and years and years in a row. I'm a weary of that. I don't need to remember where I was. I want to know where we're at now. How is that past instructing the present? I don't long wistfully for that period at all. It was awful. And it seems there's more terror than ever as you pointed out. Yeah. I mean, it was awful, but it's really awful now. And I don't know if I wouldn't go back, you know, if I was offered the opportunity. Maybe to help not make the same mistakes all over again that led to the hell we're in right now. Yeah. Guys in the signal land, anything? I think about the immediate aftermath.
It doesn't work to think about. And no, Kylie, you're absolutely right. We've talked about where we were and how we were and all those things. And the thing that I think about a lot was some of the unifying stuff that we've wound up talking about. My grandmother taped for me Pride and Prejudice. The BBC production of Pride and Prejudice was on A&E in October of 2001. And my grandmother heard I liked it and she taped it for me. And it had commercials. And do you know how many of those commercials were PSAs with first lady Laura Bush encouraging people to give blood? And I think about the opportunity that we could have had to figure out uniting in some way. Whereas now I feel like the stratification of society, most people wouldn't pee on someone
if they were on fire. And if I don't know if I want to live in a country or a world where you wouldn't pee on someone who's on fire because you don't agree with it. Okay, what country would pee on you if you were on fire? And I can't believe this is the question we're asking, but yeah, that's the measure. That's what we're shooting for. I mean, I don't know what a pee country would panic a pee? I don't know. Canada would pee, yes. Canada would be, and Canada, we're so sorry. You had nothing to do with any of this. You are the least to be blamed for anything. And I just, you know, I hope that you realize that there are good people still in this country. And we will get rid of the other ones somehow so that they're not in power anymore and fix all of the things are now broken. Yeah, the thing I keep thinking of, and I've been thinking of this for 25 years or so now, when you're on a subway in the city, you regularly hear the announcement that backpacks
and other large containers are subject to random search by the police. You know, I've never been searched. Neither have I, but now that we said that, you know, karma is going to come and bite us in the butt. The thing about that is I remember when that was new, as you know, I'm sure most of us do. And it was put out there as something that's going to be happening now because everything's scary, but this is a temporary measure because we're in this heightened state of awareness. We are being extra careful right now. And so just for a bit, we're going to be doing this thing that, you know, a little bit earlier would have been unconsciously invasive, where we're just going to randomly search people because you happen to be writing the subway. Or I think the Long Adam or Road or other road for that matter. So you're using this public utility. You are subject to a random search. And that was a temporary measure. We are now on year 25 of this temporary measure because it was, you know, pushed through
and accepted as something that's just part of the, it's part of life now. It's part of the background of being a person in the city who needs to write a train. And it always made me so sad that we were willing to accept this chunk taken out of our autonomy, our rights, with the trappings and excuse of, well, look at this terrible thing that just happened. You want to be part of what prevents that happening again, don't you? And we have just accepted it. And being more scared and being in this heightened state of quote unquote security is just something that is the baseline now. And, you know, that's where we are because when rights are taken away, it are very seldom given back. Oh, yeah, just bouncing right off of that. I'm thinking of like, what do you think about the, I'm thinking about the obligation that
emerged, this sort of a blot that were obliged to be, to participate in patriotism because that I think is a residue of that era that is prevalent now and it's indoctrinated younger generations that did not exist during this tragedy. We're only emergent afterwards. And as someone, I look at it and it's really hard to make sense of because I don't accept it period. I just, I think it's totally like, as they say, performative. And it's like wildly just bizarre to me. And then I think of, I don't make the sense of terrorism having been fixed through the things you're referring to. Also, it doesn't make sense to me because it's not fixed and the cost of that is giving
up all of those rights you're talking about. And they just, the unleashing of surveillance technologies, we are not talking about that any less. It's gotten worse. It's like, got huge amounts of computing power behind it now. And people just seem more complacent than, no, I don't mean that. There are people that are pushing back specifically on data centers and the flock cameras and all that. But there's a lot of our mainstream, the hegemonic folks out there that are going about and think, oh, that makes perfect sense that I have to submit to this or I have to go through that line and this line and apply to this special global clear pass at an airport or whatever it is. They just completely gobble it up and are, because of this background obligation to participate in enforced patriotism because that was what the dominant culture at the time agreed was
the response or that was what unity was. It wasn't people establishing common cause across socioeconomic backgrounds or ethnic backgrounds, religious backgrounds, that wasn't it. It was just stand behind the flag and accept everything that's said in the name of this. And then you look at 20 years of fighting terror and all the bodies brought back from that. Our soldiers, I'm talking about veterans who went out there and earnest, serving their country and then that failure. We look at it as a failure. Of course, it's blamed on Democrats, blamed on all kinds of people except the people that designed it and felt it would be great for various defense contracts and testing out new equipment and doing whatever else they did around that little sojourn in the Middle East, profit seeking, who knows. But I find a real incongruence in my mind that we have to participate in all of this.
We have to accept that culturally we have to give up all sorts of things. And then anything under the auspices of terrorism is somehow legitimized if you label it terrorism. Now, that is taken form and branded all over the world by us, anything even domestically now, if you're considered even thought of as a, if you wear black, if you cover up at a protest, you're a terrorist now, you're antifa and that's what we're calling terrorism. So it's when we wreak havoc and completely obliterate societies overseas under the auspices of terrorism, no matter how failed the plan is and what little results it yields, doesn't do anything for asymmetric war or terrorism. And then all of a sudden it gets turned around and anybody who dares not participate in that patriotic theater, all of a sudden you're a terrorist.
That's insane. This is so backwards and that to me is the tangible result. That's what we were left with in the wake of this. Right. Yeah, if there's one thing the whole thing did, if there's one thing it achieved, it was making it very easy for those in power to say, well, look, here are some bad guys. You're not one of those, are you? You're one of the good guys, so you're doing what we tell you. Either with us or against us, I believe was the phrase used back then. Yeah. And it still is. It still is, but it was coined then. A lot of the things that are kind of a death by a thousand cuts in a lot of ways and the things that we have become ignored too accepting. And I think about kids starting back to school and needing clear backpacks because God forbid we do something about guns. No, we can't do anything about guns.
We just need to make sure that everybody's carrying a clear bag so we can see if you have a gun in there and then maybe we'll get to it before you shoot them. And so we also prepare our kids for the eventuality of them being shot to death in school, which doesn't mess them up too much, does it? Exactly. Like, I remember, you know, I grew up in the Midwest. We had tornado drills because that was a possibility. That was scary enough. And the idea of lockdown drills, the idea of, you know, you have to sit here silently for 60 minutes so that no one finds you. And, you know, that all these pieces of security theater and performative concepts that were supposed to be temporary measures and you still can't travel with a full-size bottle of body wash.
I, that, what has happened that has made any of us safer? That has happened that has made with the exception of a small cadre of oligarchs who are benefiting off everyone's paranoia in fear. Who is in a better situation than they were 25 years ago? I've been impressed with the way you guys are expressing yourselves. I'm glad that it turned out the way it did because we need to say these things. And I encourage our listeners to also speak out in whatever forum they have and aid a clap that forum could be over time where you call us and say whatever is on your mind. But Gila, let me just tell you that it's not as bad as you think because they are allowing people to go to the gate again with people who are flying. So you, if you're accompanying somebody to an airport, you don't have to say goodbye at security. You too can go through security and go all the way down to the gate and then say goodbye
to them as they get on the plane. That is freedom. That we are getting back. We are hard ones, not in New York. Not in New York. You can't do that in New York. But other parts, if you apply in advance and pass the screening that you need before that, you use a TSA pre-check lane with the acceptable form of identification. The passes are valid for one day. Yeah, you can take that walk like you used to be able to take without a ticket. Personally, just buy a ticket, buy a refundable ticket and then cash it in. I don't know. There's got to be a way to not use this program and walk down to the gate. Do you know a way Gila? Well, here's the thing. I have in the past had to get day passes to go to the gate to help shop around unaccompanied minors between international flights and local flights.
And super fun ride. The air train JFK at 5 o'clock in the morning, bubbly into teenagers on the autism spectrum who haven't slept in three days and need to maneuver them to a local flight. But it has always existed. There are certain circumstances where you can be allowed to get to the gate to a company and unaccompanied minor or someone who needs specializes. That's from the Buddy Airlines. I'm seeing here Delta, JetBlue, American Airlines, Southwest. They all issue their own gate passes on a case by case basis. Yeah, but I guess this is a starting to get back to normal after 25 years. We can maybe have this, but not in New York. Yeah, we need to do a little bit more. But okay, so we have some information, some knowledge. I guess you'll call it whistle blowing of a sword or just revealing the fact that for
25 years, information has been kept from New Yorkers as far as the air quality after 9-11. And Maimondani yesterday accused previous New York City leaders of lying about air quality safety after the September 11 terrorist attacks, which resulted in residents and workers developing serious illnesses years later. People got sick because the leaders they trusted lied and told them they were safe to breathe in toxic air. He said a news conference at City Hall yesterday. As the years pass and the human toll grows, we reckon with the cost of September 11th, whenever another New Yorker has stolen from us too soon. 170,000 pages of documents are being released related to the toxic air quality around the site of the failed towers. So he's not pointing the finger at particular leaders, but let's just say, Rudy Giuliani
was the mayor at the time of the attacks. Christine Todd Whitman, who was the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, they both reassured New Yorkers that the air above ground zero was safe to breathe. Safe to breathe. Now either they were tremendously uninformed by the government that they were a part of, or they were lying. It's pretty simple. When audit from November 2001 based on information provided by the city's Department of Environmental Protection confirmed their elevated levels of the Cousinogen Benzine, near ground zero that month, as well as increases in the concentration of ambient asbestos on Staten Island, 10 months after the attacks, asbestos was still being found around 15 John Street, which is a building less than a mile from the World Trade Center. These records were stored in 68 boxes in the city office, shielded from public view from
more than two decades. And according to the city officials discovered only last year. Yeah, who knew? Who knew indeed? The release of the documents resolves a lawsuit that had demanded the release filed by an advocacy organization known as 9-11 Health Watch. And over the next 12 years, city officials will be reviewing, redacting, making public many more records, that's according to the mayor and the city's lead lawyer, Stephen Banks. Spokesman for Giuliani did not respond to a request for comment. Spokesman for Mayor Bloomberg became mayor four months after the attacks declined to comment. And I imagine the mayors that followed also have nothing to say right now. So I don't know, what do you guys think about this? It's just, obviously, it's a good thing, right? We're not going to debate that. Any thoughts on it? More information about what happened and what we all dealt with is a good thing.
It is light. But I think there aren't easy answers to this. I don't condone covering anything up. I think transparency is the way to go. But also, I'm forced to imagine what if they told us at the time, out in front of everyone in the media that the air was not safe to breathe? What would that have, what would have ensued? People trying to evacuate, eight million and change people out of the city, people in the surrounding areas trying to find a way out. People on Long Island who in order to get anywhere would have to go through the city. Yeah, I mean, what else would be a good Chernobyl? When Chernobyl happened and we were pointing the finger at the Soviet Union saying, why aren't you telling people? It's basically the same thing. If you have a dangerous situation like that, evacuate.
You move to a safer place until it's deemed safe to live in. Yeah, it's inconvenient as hell. But so is dying. And that long that could have been prevented had this been revealed. And you know, I wish I also hear because he'd find some way of letting him down for this. But this is a good thing. I don't see how this could be seen as a bad thing to reveal this information and to point the finger and say, why didn't you tell us? And John Stewart was there too. And he basically had the same perspective. Yeah. That's definitely a good thing. I find myself really fascinated by just the thought experiment of that alternate universe in which they told people, no, it's not safe to be here now. And how that would have shaken out. I wonder would people have masked? Well, you didn't have the trumper's back then saying that masking, I don't know, was
I mean, whatever it was, they accused people with masks of being woke, I guess. But also the idea that like, you know, we're, I didn't live here then, but you know, we're New Yorkers. We gripped through anything. And we, you know, super sharp fan is coming. So you tape your windows and button down the hatches. I think that same kind of, if they had said, also, I'm sorry, you could see, right? Like it was, they were particulates in the air. Yeah. Yeah. I was there that day. It was like, it was like after a snowstorm, you know, that quiet peacefulness, except it was horrible and, and, and, and hell. But, you know, all the cars were covered with ash. So you could say, oh, this isn't going to go away that quickly. I, you know, a mask might be. And I, you know, if they had been willing to talk about it, I, I could see that, you know, and the whole idea of pollution masking has happened in cities all around the world.
Yeah. I, I strongly agree with the sentiment that Gio is talking here. Like this is the, the kind of common sense. People would have just simply immediately begin, begin wearing proper PPE. They would have been filtering exactly what eventually happened in hospitals and in schools and everything in the aftermath of COVID-19. Of course, some of those, some of that air is even harder to filter, but particulates, asbestos. I mean, I don't know how many people are really big fans of inhaling asbestos other than the asbestos lobby, but really, I think, you know, is there still in the space does lobby? Oh, I'm sure. There's a lobby for everything. Oh, I want, I want their address. They mine, right? They mine it or something? I don't know. So yeah, I mean, if we had the right information, people would have done that immediately from the outset, and you wouldn't have long-term chronic illnesses that had occurred that then
people are filing class action lawsuits, and you have this enormously costly fund. They could have reduced, and I hate to put in economic terms, but I am. It wouldn't have been as costly, the health and the amount of people that died after 9-11. I think John Sward indicated it's like three times as many in his press conference over this. It is about awareness and allowing people to take action, not necessarily evacuate, but if that's what they need to do, because they have other respiratory illnesses, complicating factors, and they deem it necessary to leave, they would. They would, because they would know better if they could at all. And perhaps we would have had shelters, we would have had satellite housing or alternatives for people that couldn't do it themselves. We would have had a much more comprehensive emergency response if we knew certain areas were just really, really toxic. And a lot of those responders that were digging out the rubble, they were wearing masks
and stuff too, but not in every single circumstance. They would remove them to take breaks. Maybe they would have been cycling through fresh filters a lot more frequently, not removing them until you're well away. I mean, I'm talking a commute away instead of like around the block if things are that bad, or trucks moving debris have to be covered or wedded down, you know, like eliminate the possibility for dust and cross contamination. A whole lot of things, a whole cadre of things would have been prioritized that perhaps weren't. Now imagine if a whistleblower had gotten to this sooner and revealed this information. Maybe prosecutor for sure, but the information revealed was vital to be known. And it shouldn't have taken over two decades for people to find out about this. And it's just, it's mind blowing that there are people out there who think keeping this
quiet was the right thing to do. It's going to be a little bit more from this near Times article. It's clear that city officials were aware that toxins had been detected in neighborhoods removed, far removed from the World Trade Center. By September 14th, the city had set up a number of asbestos sampling sites with one location in the East Village more than a mile away. The asbestos levels detected there sometimes exceeded the city's threshold according to an October 1st email. Yeah, they knew. At the time, Dr. Philip Landrigin was a professor of preventative medicine at Mount Sinai in Manhattan, which had a large program in occupational and environmental health. He noted that although city and federal officials set thresholds for asbestos concentrations and dust and air samples to deem which areas and buildings could be reoccupied, there is no such thing as a safe asbestos risk from a medical perspective. Asbestos exposure, he said causes damage slowly over time. The pollutant that was most immediately harmful to people was to pulverize cement.
He said, which received less public attention about that research is later identified to be the cause of World Trade Center cough, which is a severe and intractable cough experienced by rescue and recovery workers, inhaling that dust from the World Trade Center was like inhaling drain, oh, he said. Dr. Mondani at the news conference yesterday was the comedian John Stewart, as mentioned, who has become an outspoken advocate for the health of September 11th survivors. In his remarks, Stewart lamented the struggle it had taken to get people to understand what everyone seemed to know who lived in downtown Manhattan that there was poison in the air and on the ground and in the windowsills and in your air conditioners and covering your pets and your clothes and stayed there for months. Everyone knew, he said, the thing is, everyone knew who lived there, but everyone knew for sure who was in government. And that's the real shameful part of all this. So it's interesting that Mondani is a part of this. And people are going to sue the city because of these revelations and he is the mayor of
the city. So I imagine the last few mayors probably resisted doing that because they didn't want the city they were governing to be sued and potentially bankrupted. But at some point you have to do the right thing and that might hurt saying that you believe in and that you're a part of. This is true, but I'm glad that he's doing what he's doing with this. And it's a shame, it's terrible that it's taken this long for any of this to get us, but especially considering how many people there must have been involved in these studies and these tests. And how many names are on the stuff in those file cabinets of people who could have at some point in the last 25 years if they're still with us have said something to someone. Yeah, it is amazing to think about this being revealed after this long.
It is also depressing, but somehow hopeful. Now I know these were stored in about 68 boxes somewhere, but they could have just as easily been stored online. And the question I'd like to pose to the hacker community, if you stumbled upon this, online, this information, what would you do? Would you reveal it? Would you back away and pretend you never saw it? Would you face the almost certain possibility that you would somehow be blamed for causing turmoil and like the sense of prison because that's the world we're living right now? It's a tough choice, but we do have access to things. We all have access to things that are of interest to other parties. At some point we have to make a decision in our minds as to whether it's worth the risk to share this with people who need to know about it. I'm not talking about state secrets, not talking about S.B. and Arjun and anything like that.
I'm talking about this kind of thing, you know, things that affect your health, things people have a right to know unless there are people who believe that we don't have the right to know this. I'm sure there are. We live in a crazy time where that sod would be equally represented on CNN. But I like to tell myself that there is still a chance for sanity in this world despite results of elections and anti-immigrant rallies and all kinds of other ugliness. I like to think decency will prevail, sanity will prevail, and you know, we just need to get together, have conversations, accept ourselves, accept our differences and not look to demonize, not look to form factions. And you know, figure out who the bad guys really are and unite against them. That's what I hope. You know, I bet that makes me think about the efforts there have been, when there have
been caches of data, of interest to the public, made available online. And the community that rallies around investigating this stuff, pouring over this stuff, you know, how many members of the hacker community were involved in not only publishing what's known as the Epstein files, but then taking all that data and going through it by bit, looking for important things. And if we could do that in a case around, you know, one rich rapist who is not going to get any more punishment because he's dead, what can we do with something of use and value to so many and, you know, of such importance to history and the present day? Yeah, you know, we've talked on the other show about how disappointing it is, the reaction to all the horrible things that are going on, the kidnappings, the killings, the overall sense of fear, anti-science, anti-education, anti-certain types of people.
And we just seem to take it, you know, we have to not miss work, we have to, you know, struggle to get by and we occasionally every few months have a two hour demonstration and feel good about that. Yeah, we're not doing enough clearly, you know, I forget where I was going with this, but we basically have, we need a sense of accomplishment. We need to know that we are getting something done, pissing off the right people. And I think the way to do that is to reveal the information that makes them squirm. And that's where the leaks come in, that's where revelations come in, where, you know, you basically dump the data and people see it for themselves. And then, maybe they react and do something and prevent this from continuing. But nothing happens with the status quo, nothing happens if we just sit back and see what's
going to happen next. What's Trump going to rename next? I mean, you America, oh yeah, that's great. That's wonderful, but, you know, we're not changing anything by just saying, hey, did you see what he did today? Yeah, I think it's got to be a combination of those things like whistle blowing, sure, leaks that are anonymous or otherwise great, you know, long form investigative journalism, brilliant, but we really have to collectively add to all of that. It has to be this sort of joyfulness in all of it being organized and distributed and shared widely into sort of sidestep a lot of the contained sort of information spheres people are in. And I think pressure, like a lot of pressure on mainstream media outlets as incredible as they've become, whether through derision or through their own actions and various consolidated forces,
shall we say, the ownership issues around mainstream media sources is a serious problem, but we still have the ability to put pressure on what kind of content is, quote, feel good. I think there's a lot we should feel good about and be sharing instead of, you know, the pleasant, happy stories that we can recast a lot of the successes that opposition and resistances having as a sort of feel good story. And the good feeling is when we, it culminates in actual change and action that can change the trajectory that we're looking at, which is really awful. And that kind of pressure also should be put on these tech companies. Google straight up, what are you doing? Apple, Facebook, Meta, all of them. They are doing a very bad job. Every single one
of those million dollar donors at his inauguration needs to be put on. Notice, blast, whatever you want to call it, what they're doing is un-American. They're lying. They're lying for liars. And we're sitting around bankrolling their innovation and their existence. It's not just reform, regulation and all of that. It needs to be all forms of strike. People, I've said this week a lot, I think it's good to be optimistic, be active politically, but we need to be planning for a general strike. Provision, get yourself ready because we will have to slowly assemble that if things do not go well and they get progressively worse with more liars and more capitulation by large corporations. And all power to matquest. Something I did want to mention because I don't know if you know about this midterm convention
that the Republicans decided to have. I heard about that today. Did you hear about the website? No. Oh yeah, I did. I did. I did hear about a fake website. So someone basically fibrousquatted on a connected term and if you visit GOP Dallas2026.com, it is a redirect to the FCED files, which I thought was a really nice little ZEP. So we need to do more things like that. And you know what Kyle was saying before about, you know, feel good stories, but also feeling good. I want people to think about the things that make them feel, I don't know, like they're not wasting time. If you hear particularly good lecture or see a particularly good comedy show or something that just makes you feel like you're not alone, you're with educated people and people will have spirit and courage and won't just bow down and do what they're told. I acknowledge that. Share that. Make sure more people get to be a part of that. I'm hoping that we are doing that for some people. Please OTH at 2600.com or email address if we are.
Stop scrolling. Talk to real people. Please share in the dialogue. Get ideas. Be creative. We are really at a deficit of creativity and we have so we have an abundance. I mean, people are doing a lot with music and art and I love that. It's a great escape. It's a great way to express certain feelings through fiction or whatever. But we need to be creative in our action and how we organize what we're getting. If you hear one story or just one or two things, how does it all fit together? And how are we organizing it and getting it distributed widely? It's not just about the people with the most follows, the most likes or whatever. It's all of us. We can all be a part of this. So if we listen to each other, let's be a part of it. Let's encourage each other and we're going to get through this thing. I hope we all remember on September 11th, all the tragedy that has come about as a result of that. Let's prevent the next one.
Prevent the ongoing ones. We'll see you next week. We'll see you at 8 o'clock on YouTube. Channel 26, aren't you? Good night. Oh, we got her safe. If I have a wrong answer, if I have a wrong answer, if I have a wrong answer, if I have a wrong answer, that makes no other thing. I don't believe in God and for this.
And I don't believe in Him. I don't believe in God. Or there's a thing in your state. When I talk with the survivors, those two sick and injured relay, if I have a wrong answer, if I have a wrong answer, if I have a wrong answer, I will recount the truth. On the rail, 100,000 men,
to fall down from the starry sky, or start a great victory. I have a wrong answer, with a car to go regain, if I have a wrong answer, if I have a wrong answer, if I have a wrong answer, I will not help you. Oh, we got her safe. Oh, we got her safe. Oh, we got her safe.
Oh, we got her safe. Oh, we got her safe. I'm afraid you're still the voice And these dark holes are trying Every time I think about it I'm afraid you're still the voice Situation has never been I go out of the dead end of time If I had a walk and walked through
If I had a walk and walked through If I had a walk and walked through Some sort of bitch would fight And I'd be there And I'd be there And I'd be there And I'd be there This is the last car You lost the pain in front of me You lost the pain in front of me This is the last car All the way in high Feel up in the hating Feel up in the hating Feel up in the hating when it's more
Give loves to hate it Give loves to hate it Give loves to hate it for ever more It's the last car You lost the pain in front of me You lost the pain in front of me This is the last car I'm afraid you're still the voice And these dark holes are trying Every time I think about it Then, if I had a walk and walked through I'd be there And I'd be there And I'd be there And I'd be there I got a way, I got a way, I got a way Let's fight the impetus global warming Upon us and our children What am I supposed to be? Treat it like gold Should be five if anything
I can't be enough for everyone I can't be living, love, together One hundred ninety four countries And I'm not a piece Where will this land, the one free time? This is the last call You're not so late, I'm not so late This is the last call You're not a way, I got a way You've lost faith, I've lost faith Those turned out come We've gotta wake up Gotta wake up We've gotta wake up We gotta wake up
We gotta wake up This is the last call You lost the baby, you're a girl You lost the pain This is the last call We gotta wake up You lost the baby, you're a girl You lost the baby, you're a girl You lost the pain We gotta wake up We gotta wake up We gotta wake up
I'm dead, I'm dead This is my safe love, you're a girl, you're a girl You can wake up in the life when you see you want me This is my safe love, you're a girl, you're a girl You can wake up in the life when you see you want me Haula And Poa and Goyo Rosalía Alejandro And what did you see from the movie? You keep dancing, you're dancing, you're dancing You're dancing That's right, that's right You're dancing for the ear You're dancing That's right, that's right
And for my fans Who are you, Goyo? Catalina Cuyo That's right The purpose of the day is to wake up I'm going to wake up in the morning I'm going to wake up morning Fuck! Such attempts to overcome alienation In order to wear the very socially relations the cause to be alienated in the first place The development Of the technological means The repuse and transmit words, sounds and images has corresponded with the growing social alienation. This, the development of technological needs to increase communication between people
that are far away has corresponded to a growing distance between those that are nearby. From this growing alienation, food is decided to overcome it. Millen canteras written about a phenomenon called Gaffanomania, the desire to see one's writing in print, the desire to gain recognition, fame from one's writings. We've used this as being directly related to the alienation between people who are physically dear to each other. Letting connection with those nearby trade recognition from those far away. In the islands of the Masin region of Papia and Yugenia, people who are separated from water become known through trade and the gifting of the decorated chest.
Every cooler shell is unique and everyone shows who made it. The type of fame that the society creates directly related to its communication technology. If the islands of the cooler shell circulate, it tells this unique because people do not mechanically produce them. And people become known by a smaller number of people that know that they are facing all the society. But the quality of the knowledge that is spread about them is quite different. The degree of alienation is very special to the time of the death and of the death of the death of the disease. It was not as if due to the stint alienation between people in today's classified societies. In the third, we have passed oral elaboration for the folks
who are very distant from the city, with words, sounds and unity. The nature of fame has changed along with the elaborate southern alienation. An nationalist who knows the emanation. In this case it is imperative to understand several pl הפenagne that have been described as just as a bunch of declarations in such a short period that are strictly harmless and honest. Another issue is the old equ kriegen through the land of hot gemini ut gemia nara – which ones are extremely useful.
Fine. Thank you very much. Well, well we will come back. Would you be a bit slow next? Very fast next. More克力? Morecross the song... You made a debut. Ha but it's really close. Final compartment is here. He's still naming... Sima is another veteran. Capturer has two nicheвал forwards... I have kind of driven the path we proceed towards the border First of all, a passion from ABCE Never Someone ever asks you... A polite guy always expects you from him Same, only a few minutes Your long- tobacco commands made all possible Even though I hope this helps me Hi Well, date will mnie be over I have so many people, we are님 for resource, therefore we find this place to getパ ладно
Lots of people have beenт Yeah, there are several kinds of wild sprays here Name of all the por לה I personally drink coffee very much and I also tried to make it a commercial area that suitswith this시�aker and the reason is a problem with many such streaming I sell a place for more people and get permission to get that as I said here in order to say that everyリょ 2l GDP will comment We didn't make a dumb decision.. We didn't have a king of operators before yet. We couldn't have anyone tripping behind the rocks. To paint that by isn't right. Very surprisingly, the only people who can demonstrate the same effect as the sky's light, or one of the main effects are this side.
It's a rock music music, which makes it look like freshly crested crack-TV. ChYA V1 second responders Hoi Mayo, M. hahaha A total of eight tapes, I'm just gonna tell you that we're able to do a растhing we realize that the thirty units from hoot the sound about This brings some fresh image contents with us, erm, is one hustle and diligence아 is something that is more traditional.
I had to say at the begining infield sympathisher that it is shouldn't necessarily be adequate. As it consists of others' faults, it takes a time to certain culture to acquire such attitude, and also to get an Master of sleeves a degree. We think that, for multiple reasons in those reasons, the gaming machines is also limitable. Only that. Actually, we're really close to... the actual key piece of defense. We work on that, that, really. And then, the black plate of defense company, South Woulding Studio, had the format that wasn't provided with... giving it to the players. The event was available compare to the other part. So maybe you're not allowed to say that... Lady Sample. I see a question from the Ministry of Law. Yes, thank you. You have said that since 2012, it never happened.
The people have never been in action under name. Could you speculate on why you think that the people have no action under name? Why? This is just a matter of time. Well, they have... The reason why we can't help it is that one of the journalists who have been on the field, has been on a field. They have been looking for all correspondences. This is very important, but you can see that they have no action under name. Or this jury who has been under name or not. They have been looking for the parties to see if they can move, or if they can move or not. So we have been in action under name, but not on the field. You can see that the jury is not in action under name, but on the field, you can see that the jury is not in action under name or not. Or they have been looking for all correspondences. And the reason I think that all correspondences have been on the field
for 1 or 2 years, and they have been working on the SADC for years. So I think that the jury are not in action like that. The dog is called an old economy, and drags it to Laund second. And I am so interested. And maybe I move in with this Great. However, I'd like to ask your lawyer. I'm not just an attorney, but the lawyer. I want to ask your lawyer about the opinion. As a lawyer? I want to ask my lawyer about the opinion.
More episodes
