
About this episode
David and Kate explore the historical divide between Symbolist and Connectionist approaches to AI, reflecting on how today’s dominant AI narratives emerged and what may have been lost along the way. They discuss the difference between expert systems built on structured human knowledge and data-driven learning systems based on neural networks, and consider the implications of each for governance, traceability, social impact, and responsible technology development. The conversation highlights how alternative approaches to AI may offer more practical and trustworthy pathways for addressing real-world challenges.
Get every episode summarized
Each time The IDEMS Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from The IDEMS Podcast

296 – Navier–Stokes and What AI Means for Mathematics
The IDEMS Podcast
Sep 11, 202628:10completed

295 – Putting Climate Data Rescue into Practice
The IDEMS Podcast
Sep 8, 202627:21completed

294 – Reflections on Climate Data Rescue
The IDEMS Podcast
Sep 4, 202621:08pending

293 – The Problem of Zeros in Data
The IDEMS Podcast
Sep 1, 202613:56pending