
healthAug 27, 20201:18:45pending
67 - Mikael Eriksson on the Value and Pitfalls of Devices
About this episode
Endurance Innovation is now on Patreon! Have a peek at our page and show us some love.
- 4:00 is training tech driving improvement at high levels of endurance sport?
- 5:00 proliferation of training data and data acquisition devices helps coaches first, with a trickle-down effect for self-coached athletes
- 9:30 performance tracking devices (watches / bike computers), heart-rate monitors, and power meters
- Mostly beneficial in training, but still useful in racing
- Sensor reliability is affected more in RF ‘noisy’ environments
- Stryd power meter or well-calibrated footpods can be more accurate for distance and pace
- 17:45 the value of advanced running and cycling metrics like L/R balance, GCT, stride length, torque smoothness, etc.
- No evidence-based value in tracking these metrics. No evidence for effective interventions to make positive changes to performance
- Many of these add-on metrics are marketing tools for product differentiation
- 28:15 tracking and planning - training diary - programs
- Essential for any serious athletes
- Very important to log subjective comments and RPE along with the physiological data pulled from recording devices + sensors
- Record RPE immediately after the workout
- Watch / head unit integration is very handy
- No need for most athletes to delve into high-end analytics packages like WKO and Golden Cheetah
- 39:30 HRV and other recovery / 'readiness to train’ tools
- Useful for trend rather than acute - day-to-day - analysis
- Some doubts in validity of studies showing efficacy
- Little value in measuring live or all-day HRV
- Sleep trackers not accurate and not very useful
- 50:30 Garmin’s recovery advisor / VO2max / fitness / calorie measurement tools
- DO NOT USE!
- 54:45 Michael is not a fan of Strava
- 57:45 performance testing: lactate / VO2max
- Find a reputable lab to do any testing, so ask questions and do your homework
- 4’ minimum step duration for lactate testing. 5’ and 6’ also common
- Repeatability is key, so try to use the same lab and the same equipment for subsequent tests
- INSCYD testing is great for repeatability, accessibility, and data quality
- 1:08 aerodynamic sensors
- Not yet suitable for individual endurance athletes
- Other aero testing is potentially very useful
- A good bike fit goes a long way towards improving aerodynamics
- KEEP YOUR HEAD DOWN!
- 1:13 swim video analysis can be quite useful
- The 4 key views: above, side above water, side below water, front below water
Check out Scientific Triathlon and listen to Mikael's excellent podcast That Triathlon Show at your favourite provider.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Endurance Innovation publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Endurance Innovation

John Buckley: Real-World Tire Testing and the Breakpoint Debate
Endurance Innovation
Apr 14, 20261:11:45failed

Ingmar Jungnickel on AiRO and Scalable Aerodynamic Testing
Endurance Innovation
Nov 19, 20251:25:32pending

Coach Russ Cox on Qualifying for the Ironman World Championship
Endurance Innovation
Nov 11, 20251:03:07pending

Jamie Pugh of EXO Analytics on Carbohydrate Utilization
Endurance Innovation
Oct 7, 202553:21pending