Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsSep 9, 202622:09

9/11 and the long shadow of Islamophobia

About this episode

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani called on current Mayor Zohran Mamdani not to attend an annual ceremony commemorating the terror attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. Giuliani also made false claims about Islam, Mamdani’s religion. Mamdani said he will attend the ceremony. Moustafa Bayoumi, professor at Brooklyn College, explains more.

Then, in the months following the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attack in New York City, officials repeatedly reassured New Yorkers that the air in lower Manhattan was safe to breathe. But this week, 170,000 pages of documents made public by Mamdani show that wasn’t true. Ben Chevat, executive director at the nonprofit 9/11 Health Watch, breaks down the findings.

And, in 1998, terror attacks hit two U.S. embassies and in 2000, the USS Cole was attacked. Princeton University historian Julian Zelizer says these events were warning signs ahead of 9/11 that the government missed.

See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.

NPR Privacy Policy

Get every episode summarized

Each time Here & Now Anytime publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

479 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

9/11 and the long shadow of Islamophobia

Here & Now Anytime

0:00
22:09

Full transcript

Here & Now Anytime9/11 and the long shadow of Islamophobia. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

Support for here and now anytime comes from MathWorks, creator of MATLAB and Simulink Software, to design and develop engineered systems, accelerating the pace of discovery in engineering and science. Learn more at mathworks.com WBUR Podcasts. Boston. Islamophobia is part of our political scene today, and Muslims are its victims. In some ways, the country has changed a lot since 9-11. In other ways, sadly, it has not. It's Wednesday, September 9th, and this is here and now anytime from NPR and WBUR. I'm Chris Bentley. Today on the show, as we approach 25 years since the September 11th attacks, we're learning just how much officials

knew at the time about contaminated air that was sickening New Yorkers. And clearly from the documents that we've seen, they had concerns, and what they did with those concerns is really bothersome. Also, the historian says terrorists' attacks in 1998 and 2000 should have been warning science, but the government failed to connect the dots. I think it's worth wondering whether we're now repeating some of those mistakes. It's not clear the government is reacting fast enough or adjusting to the new threats, let alone other issues like pandemics and climate change. That's coming up in about 15 minutes. By the way, we'll have lots more on Friday's episode, marking 25 years since 9-11, so click that follow button in your podcast player now. We're gonna hear from some of you who shared your memories of that day and how it changed your lives. But first, one painful legacy of that day is anti-Muslim bigotry, something that flared up after the attacks in 2001,

egg-donned by many leaders in government and media at the time, but which was not left in the past. Look, no further than the Islamophobic remarks Rudy Giuliani made last week on the right wing outlet Newsmax. Giuliani was mayor of New York in 2001, and he does not want New York's current mayor, Zeran Mamdani, to attend the 9-11 commemoration on Friday because Mamdani is Muslim. They have every desire to take us over. This is not, they want to be just another religion. Well, Mamdani told WCBS in New York, he will attend. What I want this week to be a focus on is on the families whose loved ones were stolen from them 25 years ago in the horrific act of terror of September 11th and a focus also on the first responders who give everything they could to this city and to the people who came together to try and help their fellow New Yorkers. We wanted to hear from another Muslim New Yorker, Mustafa Bayumi. He's an English professor at Brooklyn College, author of a number of books,

including this Muslim American life, dispatches from the war on terror. Here's his conversation with Robin Young. There's a concerted campaign to turn what should be a somber reflective moment into a political football. And that political football is about making life really difficult, not just for mayors, Aham Mamdani, but making life increasingly difficult for Muslim Americans around this country. And I think that that really illustrates something that's at the core of what Islamophobia is all about today, which is to say that it's not just a kind of irrational hatred. Islamophobia is part of our political scene today and Muslim's arts victims. 25 years ago, many people didn't even really know what Islam was in any way. All they knew was that Muslim terrorists

had done this incredibly evil thing. Are you saying there's a difference between that shock and not understanding and then 25 years later in Islamophobia? There is a continuity, though, between 25 years ago and today. And that continuity is that life has been increasingly difficult for Muslim Americans all the way through. But the other part of that continuity is that from what began as a shock, quickly turned into politics and it became instrumentalized into our political scene. There was a concerted effort. There was a real honest desire, I think, from a lot of ordinary Americans to understand this thing that was suddenly in front of them. And that this thing we would call Islam, for example, in the weeks following 9-11, Oprah Winfrey, even had a show called Islam 101. But the problem, too, is that we focus on,

we have to understand the Quran, which was like, it instantly became a bestseller following 9-11 as well. But in fact, instead of doing that, what we really should be looking at, I think, are the historical reasons, the contexts for political violence in our whole world. And that we still have precious little discussion over. Yeah, well, we're going to put that aside for this discussion, because I want to talk more about what's happening now, which is, you talk about words like Giuliani's, fanding the flames, the embers that have been there. And they have been, as we heard from family members of 9-11 victims, they gathered at City Hall yesterday to present a petition calling on Mayor Mandani not to come Friday. Here's Sherry Sparatio, her husband killed on 9-11. She was surrounded by others holding pictures of their lost loved ones. I believe this is on Fox News. Let's listen. I want to make clear that our petition is not about Mayor Mandani's religion,

or where he came from. It is strictly about the policies that he has today. And what they are talking about, Professor, and it's in their petition, they cite Ramsey Kasim, Mayor of Mandani's chief counsel. Kasim has represented in the past a brother-in-law of a 9-11 hijacker. And last week, Mandani signed an executive order recognizing the 25th anniversary of 9-11. And he asked for the ceremonial signing pen to be handed to Ramsey Kasim. Wall Street Journal opinion writer Matthew Hennessey said, Mandani in that action mocked the loss his city suffered on 9-11. What do you make of that, your thoughts? Oh, this is just foolishness. You asked me, Ramsey Kasim is actually performing all of the promise of the Constitution by providing defense to people in a judicial setting. He's highly regarded by the whole legal community. And to tar his reputation in his name,

like this is just ridiculous. But what's that the appropriate choice for this day? Ramsey Kasim has a position within the mayor's cabinet. He's legal advisor. So I don't see why there's a problem here. To your noting that this has been going on for a long time, and we've almost forgotten that President Trump issued executive orders in his first term restricting travel from Muslim majority countries that was overturned. But in 2016, he said, I think Islam hates us. These are phrases that if you're not Muslim, may have gone by, but I'm assuming if you are, they're adding up. Absolutely. I mean, first of all, to take President Trump's comment when he was candidate, Trump islam hates us. Who is the us in that? As if Muslim Americans do not belong within the United States. Muslim Americans have been in the United States since before the United States was the United States. There's a documented history of people who were enslaved from Africa who came over to this land,

who were Muslim. But you know, Muslim Americans have been dealing with a lot of things over the last 25 years, from vigilante violence, government repression, to spies and informants in our midst, more violence against us. And now, a concerted effort by very conservative members of the government in an anti-Sharia law caucus. This whole thing about the idea that Sharia law is going to take over the United States, that's just also fear of ongoing. And these are the kind of daily realities that Muslim Americans have been dealing with for the last 25 years. So I think I know. But what do you think Mayor Mondani should do regarding the 9-11 ceremony? Of course, he should attend. He's the mayor of New York City. And as the mayor, he should be there. Mustafa Bayumi, English professor at Brooklyn College professor. Mustafa, thank you so much for speaking with us today. It's been a pleasure. Thank you. Can I just ask as a Muslim this week, in New York, I have Muslim friends in New York who lost friends on 9-11?

I mean, how are you approaching this week? For us, and for me, it is about remembering the past in all of its complexity and all of its fullness, which includes all the things that have happened. From that day forward, but it also means thinking about making the future brighter. And I think that there is a way that we can all do that if we really want to. Thank you so much. Thank you. Coming up next, another lingering problem 25 years later is the public health toll of air poisoned by dust and debris in the aftermath of 9-11. After the break, what newly released documents show about the impact and what leaders knew at the time. That's in just a minute.

In the months after 9-11, authorities repeatedly assured New Yorkers that the air in Lower Manhattan was safe to breathe. It's taken nearly 25 years for New York City officials to admit that was not true. More than 9,000 people have died since then of illnesses related to the debris in the air, according to the 9-11 victim compensation fund. This week, New York Mayor, Zaroni Mdani, made public more than 170,000 pages of documents related to air quality and said the government needs to be transparent. People got sick because the leaders they trusted lied and told them they were safe to breathe in toxic air. It's part of a settlement between New York City and 9-11 Health Watch, an advocacy organization that sued the city to force the publication of the documents. Ben Shavat is the group's executive director. Here's what he told Indira Lachmanon. There was this overwhelming feeling, and I don't fault the administration in the chaos

for making mistakes. They said, come back to New York, the air was safe, and clearly from the documents that we've seen, they had concerns. There's a famous line by Michael Kinzley, a scandal in Washington is when someone tells the truth. We're clearly seeing indications that they were aware that there were problems. I think what happened here is the politicians didn't want to admit that maybe they should have slowed down. Maybe they should have brought kids back to go to school at Stuyverson and the high school of finance in other places. Maybe they should have brought my mother, who was there on 9-11, a vacuator over the sea wall. Maybe they should not have brought them all back. Maybe they should have expressed some caution. And I'm not a responder. I talked to a lot of responders. Most of them have said, well, I would have done what I did, but it would have been nice if they had been honest with me. If they had told us the truth and given me that choice. Right. So millions of pages of documents are expected to be released over the coming months.

170,000 pages are now available. What stands out to you from what you've seen so far? We have that memo about its vestis existing in a building in Lower Manhattan as late as I think July. I mean, it's self-evident from what we've seen today. They were aware of these problems. They were aware of the toxic chemicals. And they didn't say anything. They actually said the opposite. And had they actually admitted it, maybe Congressman Maloney, Mr. Nadler, the New York delegation, wouldn't have had to struggle for years to overcome the Bush administrations and the Congress's attitude that there wasn't a problem. So tragically, we now know that almost three times the number of people have died of illnesses related to toxic chemicals from 9-11 then died in the crashes on the day itself. Is this a problem that's going to continue for decades to come like the lasting health effects in a place like Hiroshima or Chernobyl?

Tractically, I think we are going to be saying it. We see it every day. And tragically, it is cancers. That is predominantly what is happening now with the latency period. We're seeing more and more every day. And it's not just the cancers of people who live in New York. On 9-11, people came from all over the country to respond. And then they went home. We have to be able to reach those people and make sure they have the connection and understand that maybe there is a connection to their condition and their experience at 9-11. So Ben, what happens next? Do you have certain things that you want the government to do in terms of treating or monitoring people who were exposed to the toxic dust? We're still fighting. We just fought for full funding of the health program just this year. Had this information been out, maybe we weren't have had to spend that much time fighting for that. One of the things that I think didn't get enough attention in our negotiation and our settlement is Mayor Mendani is going to use his social media skills

to help promote the program, to help promote a new youth research cohort, which is finally after 25 years going to be looking at and gathering data on the health impact of those who were in school, those who were living there. The city is going to, and it's going to take some time, is going to help people get the records they need in order to participate in the program. So it's not just about the records. I think we're going to get a much more active city government. And we're going to be meeting with the Corporation Council every month for the next year to help work on these projects with the Mayor. Ben Shavad is executive director of 9-11 Health Watch and advocacy organization that sued to force the publication of Reams of Government documents related to the health effects in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Ben, thank you so much for your time. Thank you. One more conversation for you coming up on today's show.

Indira talks with Princeton historian Julian Zellazar about the events leading up to September 11th. It's a story of mist warning signs. And it tells us something about the future of disaster preparedness, not just for terror attacks, but all threats from pandemics to climate change. Stick around. This message comes from the Center for US Voters Abroad Foundation. US citizens live, travel, and serve all over the world. But wherever they are, they can stay connected to home through voting. All US citizens abroad may request an absentee ballot to vote in the 2026 election and requesting yours is easy. Keep your connection strong no matter how far away you are. Visit registerabroad.com to get started. As we pause this week to reflect on 25 years since the September 11th attacks, we want to look back at the many warnings about the nation's vulnerability to terrorism

in the years leading up to that horrific day. The bipartisan 9-11 commission that investigated the attacks concluded that all the warning signs were there, and some of the attackers were even being tracked by intelligence agencies, but the government failed to connect the dots. In the decade since, has the government learned from its mistakes. Princeton historian Julian Zellazar just published a piece asking those questions, and he joins us now, Julian, welcome back. Thanks for having me. So in the years before that fateful day, there were several terrorist attacks that built up to 9-11. I'm thinking of 1998 when Al Qaeda bombed the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing 224 people. What action did the US government take to bolster the nation's security after those attacks? Well, there is a military response with something called Operation Infinite Reach under President Clinton, which includes missile strikes. There are law enforcement operations through the FBI to look into agents working in the area.

There's embassy security reform, and finally, Congress sets up a bipartisan national commission on terrorism to look at some of the vulnerabilities in the American infrastructure. Well, there was also this White House Commission on aviation safety in 2000, where those recommendations ever implemented. Some of them were, although in retrospect, not enough. There was a new pre-screening system for passengers that was put into place, new methods to detect explosives, and also new mechanisms to check screener performance and background checks. But there were many other recommendations that the commission either put forward or never even addressed that in retrospect were key during 9-11. And then, Julian, those of us who covered it remember less than a year before 9-11, Al Qaeda suicide bombers in a small boat attacked and tore a massive hole in the USS Cole while it was refueling at Port in Yemen. 17 US sailors were killed.

What lessons should the government have taken from that attack that might have prevented September 11th? Well, there's been a lot of criticism ranging from the failure to strongly retaliate against Al Qaeda for what had happened to continued resistance to ending the walls that separated different intelligence gathering operations within the United States to simply not really processing where this was all going to focusing on the bombings and a couple years early, the embassy attacks and not doing enough for the domestic infrastructure of the United States, which was also very vulnerable. Well, we learned from the 9-11 commission that the left hand of the US government did not know what the right hand was doing. The CIA was tracking suspected terrorists outside the US, but not coordinating with the FBI to track them inside this country. The FBI learned a suspect was training to fly planes but didn't want to learn how to land them, but that was never flagged up the chain. I remember way back in 1995,

the US learned Al Qaeda was planning to bomb US-bound aircraft in a scheme called the Bojinka plot. Meanwhile, US intelligence agencies were full of Russian speakers a decade after the fall of the Berlin Wall, but had very few Arabic speakers. So hindsight is 2020, of course, but from your perspective as historian, what went wrong? Look, some of it is the fact that government institutions are often slow to change. They're big, they're large, they're rooted in history, and it often takes time to adjust to new realities. Added to that is the gridlock of Washington, which makes progress very difficult. Some of it was a bias of not taking the threats from the region seriously as they had other areas like the Soviets during the Cold War. And finally, there were reforms in the 70s, which intentionally separated the FBI and the CIA in response to revelations of how government officials had abused the power. So there was a resistance to going all in on centralization

given the history and the record of the US government abusing that authority. Fascinating. So in some ways, perhaps an over correction and effort to fix an earlier problem of centralization that ended up leaving all these holes. Do you think the government has learned the lessons of September 11th, 25 years later? Well, I mean, I think slowly they did learn a lot of the lessons of 9-11, and we changed our counterterrorism programs. We changed the organization of government. But I think it's worth wondering whether we're now repeating some of those mistakes. There are new kinds of national security threats from cyber security to social media radicalization, to even financing organizations through crypto that it's not clear the government is reacting fast enough or adjusting to the new threats that the country faces, let alone other issues like pandemics and climate change. So I think there's a case to be made that that slowness is right in front of us again.

What do you think the government should be doing to protect against future pandemics or climate change? Crisis. Well, look, I think if it had the stomach a big bipartisan commission that would put out reports very soon to lay out what we need to do would be essential rather than piecemeal trying to figure this all out on the spot. That's Princeton historian Julian Zelliser. Julian, thank you so much. Thanks for having me. That's it for the show today. Here and now anytime comes from NPR and WBWR Boston. Today's stories were produced by Wilder Fleming, Jill Ryan and Jenna Griffiths, our editors were Mikhail Rodriguez and Michael Scado, technical direction from Matt Reed and Nick Dusalt. Our theme music is by Mike Miscado, Max Liebman and me, Chris Bentley. Our digital producers are Allison Hagen and Grace Griffin, and here and now's executive producer is Alan Price. Thanks for listening. We'll be back with you tomorrow. And we'll have that special episode on the 25th anniversary of 9-11 on Friday.

So click the follow button in your podcast player now. Thanks for watching. I'll see you next time. Bye.

More episodes

More from Here & Now Anytime

View all episodes →