9/5/26 – Shiur 575 – ELECTIONS IN ISRAEL – CHAREIDIM AND THE DRAFT | TZEDAKA QUESTIONS | MUSICAL SELICHOS

0:00Welcome to the Ishi Vishal Milo, this is David Lichtenstein. This week we're going to have two topics. First we're going to be speaking with a growing, rebarrensorcer of Wartaberry and we're going to be asking him about Michulachem by Davane. Is there a mitzvah to give them a naad? Do you say Isaac be mitzvah potamanamitsvah? Do you say burr-paskins and all that say for a kriya saivatira? That you don't give where it could disturb. He says like baruchu, kriya saivatira, etc. We're going to ask him for Isaac be mitzvah potamanamitsvah. Should we be giving? And in fact, you even makaim imitsvah, because Rudwah says, when it's Isaac be mitzvah potamanamitsvah, you're not makaim imitsvah if you do it or be speaking about that. What we're thinking about in Hulchut Sedaka, those who go around for dearest, could you take that out of my semanny if you're giving them? The shahalar says that an anne is supposed to rent a deer or not bar a deer. And the third question we're going to talk to a baron is about musical sliches.

1:02So many places have bands playing by sliches. Is that lahalahana, there's some say for famous rewrites, that it's awesome to have a band in a shawl, or you could be makaim like, you could say he was talking about an organ, which was Davar Kavua, which they had from the reform movement that brought organs into shals. It's one, it's not an organ, it's a bunch of whatever they play with, the guitars and drums, whatever. The second thing is it's Kavua, not Kavua. And the third is nobody cares anything about the reform movements anymore. They don't even have a graduating class in this seminary. There's nothing left to it. So do we still have to worry about it at a time when it's going to be so much of his solace? So we'll hear what Haggoyne Barrensorcha says. He's the ruv and the dine of waterberry. He's the the maggots' share of the shahalar illuminated. He was a boikin for many years, for the boys coming into the issue of his legwood. Certainly one of the biggest tomaheacham in America. Then we're going to be speaking about this new party in our history. All elections are coming up. So Rebius Shawaffafar used to be on the bed of Abashuais. He founded with among others a new party called Hatsibur Hakhareidi.

2:04And he's going to explain what it is. And then we're going to have Rebius Hakhpindris, who's a member of the Knesset for the de Galatura. And he's going to say what the sheet of the other parties is, the de Galatura, etc. Before we go to our guests, I want to say a small vart on this week's parasha. Atem Nitsavim Hyaim. So the Maffarshim say a lot of the Maffarshim Hyaim Nitsavim Hyaim goes on. Qual is strong in Russian. Hyaim, the zoyer, says, is always Russian. So we are standing Hyaim on the Nihashemalik. So the question is, Atem Nitsavim Hyaim. It should say Atem, Sadikim Hyaim, Atem, to me, Mhaim. Like Nitsavim doesn't sound like a very big accolade. You're standing here. Okay. I want to share with you a story. It's not a Jewish story, but it's still a powerful story. In 2002, they had the Olympics. In Australia, it had a fellow Stephen Bradbury. He was competing in the Olympics. He was considered such a last shot like nobody even looked at him. He was beside the fact that he was from Australia, which doesn't.

3:06Not known for its great athletes. You know, it's a tiny country of 20-someone million people. But he also had an accident two years before that where he broke his neck. And he had a neck brace and all kinds of chemicals, etc. So here's something interesting. Bradbury went into the race. And the elite favorites were from the United States and from Korea, South Korea, China, Canada, who were way faster than him. So knowing he was a long shot, he devised a simple strategy. Just stay out of trouble, stay in back at him. Maybe you'll get lucky. And what happens? They're running around the track. And there's an accident. They're all four of the four leads are right standing. One of them, the fellow Apollo, Ono from the USA, crashed into another. He knocked them down. The other two veer it to the sides. They crashed into each other. They got knocked down. And they were both out of the race. All four of them. And he was the last man standing. And he ran in and he won the race and he won the gold. So sometimes just being standing, that enough is enough to win the gold. And I think if you look at Rashi, it says.

4:06Rashi tells us watch stands behind the path they got them. He said they heard the Tehrache. They heard all the clolest. It's Amich has calls. I rico-pneum. And what did Masha say? He said, you know, you got to a Michelin very mere. And he didn't. And you're still standing. And if you're still standing, that means you won. So we have different ways of measuring life. Most of us have a ledger. And maybe we, this is by the way, this stigletair is not for Benelia. I'm saying it's for an Ashram shoot them like me. It doesn't say atem shlamem, atem sadikim. It says atem ni tsavim. You're still standing. And sometimes if you're just standing, that's pretty amazing. You're here in shul. You're back. You're still here. You still want to be better. You still feel bad that you're not as good as you could be. The first filler we say every day in shul is my tovoo a halach a yakai. And saying it to your whole life, let me give you an amazing insight to it. It was said by Billah Marasha. And that's how we started the avenue.

5:07There must be something special here, like behalten, something hidden. And I'll tell you what it is. Billahm gave many brachas. Right? Many before four different brachas. Five different brachas, if you can't find the last one, about a shea. And the gammars is cool, neb cooler klawa. All the brachas turn into a klawa except for my tovoo a la chayaka. He couldn't shake my tovoo a la chayaka. Anything we did, that stayed standing. What the butte can see is in the butte midrushes of klawa usrah langolas, where people go three times a day to cry their hearts out to the bina shalom. So what does my tovoo a la chayaka watch the significance of it? It's indominable. It's the cornerstone. That little stable of yours, it's the rack. We start the avenue by saying we're starting the avenue with its filler that's indestructible, going to show. There's something about just keep standing with all the aggravation of the last year. With all the tichle shalom a kill oisea, the colors, with all the setbacks,

6:10with all the the fighting, with the acrimony, with the with the avaris that we've done. You know what? We came back to shalom and we're still standing. You know, I'd be sure to all salanta. Some say was, I see them say the same thing, but from a big, a different one, a big, big rebis, the baditjava, they say he was walking home last night and he pissed a tailor who was working with a light of a candle very late at night, it was after he finished his, his mishma, he looked inside, why are you still working? It's so late. The tailor looked up at him and said words that changed Rebis' soul's life. He said, calls manas the Brent at the lichte le Brent, mekenach me sakinzain. As long as the candle burns, it's still possible to repair. And Rebis' soul you should repeat that sentence the rest of his life. As long as the candle burns, it's still possible to repair. And that's what my cherabé nous sore. When you looked at Uncle Yesterl, after Darboim shalom akud badoyer, and after that Samenchets klairs, and you know, he sore. And he sore, after the eggil and the Miragelem in Balpoir, and he saw them standing there.

7:14And he said, at them, they'd suffer my yoyam. You're still standing. Isn't that amazing? So if we go to Russia shalom this year and we're feeling, oh, what am I doing here? But I know all my averias and my setbacks and what is the tire at all you? At them needs of him. You showed up and you're still standing. And that is amazing. Let's go tower riddles of the week. I'm going to give the riddles on Russia shalom, the Slyches. The Shlokhidaruch says that that Wernoyig, that whoever daven Slyches is Mespau, Kala Yoyam, all the Tphilis of the Yoyam. And even, Mr. Briss says, even the Myrith of the night before. So here's the question. I can understand you want to say he daven Slyches, then he daven Shachrith. Which I would say to the Philus. So he say, no, Slyches is sort of a Hagdama to Shachrith. So even though at the end of Slyches you say Kadesh to Skaba, which seems to say it's Phyllis over, it's its own Tphila, but it's a Tphila that's a Hagdama to Shachrith.

8:17I can't understand. But what is Myrith? How is Myrith a Hagdama to Shachrith? I don't understand that. It bothered me for years. If you have an answer, Adiraba. Here's another question. The Ramam says in Parikbeza, Wilkha's Chuvha, that if you miss Vadebidwarim, he say Vida, but in your heart you know it's baloney and I'm going to do it. He says, Harry, he says, Doymil, Doymil, the Toivil, the Sherrits, be your day. That if you go to the mikvhen, you're carrying a, and in the mikvhen, you're holding on to our Sherrits. I don't know, a salamander or an iguana. So the iguana is Kheiser and Metamiu, the entire time you're doing. He says, What are you accomplishing? I mean, look how the Ramam is doing. It's very difficult. You go, If you miss Vadebidwarim, but you don't mean it. So the Vida is nothing. The Vida is insincere and not a Vida. You do Chuvha, but you're pebb. I'm not polite. It's garner. Chuvha has to be polite. Two, Toilor, the Sherrits, be your day. You're not shot that you did nothing. You did a Tvila. The second you did a Tvila, you tore me again from the Sherrits. So in the first case, it's never how the whole din.

9:17I'm sorry, the Vida is Vadebidwarim, and you don't believe it. There is no Vida. Here, there is a Tvila, but the Tvila becomes an Isnabatil contemporaneously because of the Sherrits. That's riddle number two. Riddle number three. This is a really alumnus, you're riddle. So if you benched Birchastatoyer and a safer tyra, and the Batsfila goes, Oh, man. And he looks and he says, Oh, no. It's possible. The first letter is possible. He stops. They bring another safer tyra and worse salacha. You don't have to make a new broocher. They rush. They bring the Mishdubur says in, he brings the Nibbini and Sien, right? Darachlaner. And Tavkuf Pehei Sivdhalud, right? He says that if you made a brocher on the Shaffer, and they took it from him, and they gave him another Shaffer, so it's considered a Hefsik, Turglaxel-Avarach. Why, by safer tyra, if they change the Shaffer, the broch is chal? By Shaffer, you should say the exact same thing. Those are our three riddles.

10:19If you want to leave a message by phone or dial in by phone to listen, in America, our number is 732-806-8700. In England, it's 444, I think that's the country code. 330-011-702-50, and erichisrel, it's 0-2-372-030404. Now let's go to our wonderful program. Music Joining us from Waterbury in Sarabha, going to Barron, Swasher, he was for many years in the Bithmetis Pivaya, the restabura of the Durshukabura.

11:19He was a boy's son for the Shiva, and boys had to, when they get into the Shiva, he was a boy from the Tastobois. He's the rob of the community, the dying of Waterbury community, and he's also a market share for a rice welcome to Barron. No, no, you're a bobbin. For Barron, here's the question. There are shools where collectors come just, I mean, a... A flunchel and monsey, I don't know, once counted, it was 40 collectors over the course of the Davin, which made Davin very difficult. So the question is, are they doing the right thing by collecting? Or is it a Mitzfah Baba's era? It's two questions. The question is, are the collectors doing the right thing or the wrong thing? The question, I mean, the least three. The question is the Mistallem, what should they react to me? And the question is, the shoo, the killer. Today make any type of taqana in this area. In the action, let's discuss the Mistallem first. That's an Indian in the Gomerium.

12:19How is the Mitzfah Baba doing in Mitzfah? You know, the Gomerium says, if you're busy with Shavasya, they don't, then you don't have to give a risk to the onion. That's part of the reason why, if you're watching, and I say to you, you're ashamed of it, you're saving money. Say, you don't have to give money to the poor person that comes if you're busy with the Aveda. Certainly, being busy with any part of Davin, would be considered Acy Comitura to talk to you from your kids' backup. But very often, Acy Comitura is not followed completely today. It's how it is usually, you know, the people who are... A lot of things in Allah, which talks about Acy Comitura. I'd like to say somebody is selling a Sregum and a Lava. Allah says he doesn't Davin Minsha because he's Acy Comitura. We haven't really done that. The question is exactly why and why not. But, past is, it's not an issue to give the money to the onion. You could argue that it is, but past is, it's not. And practically speaking, that's what people are. That's what you find out. And the end of it, do want to get the smaller donations from the ones you put people, that's really the only way they have to do it.

13:21And I would say that there's no issue involved. If the majority of the people feel it's very disturbing, then the schools could certainly make it their kind of selling people that too, not to come. And then the misplow and the darecloth shouldn't give it. They're not keeping with the rules of the show. But the most schools, especially the white schools, that have the young of all the time, there's no such thing as their kind of. And I would think that for the majority of the misplowmen there, they don't mind. Either they do give, or they don't give. So either way, they understand, they understand that people will want to collect this particular type of collecting to reach the lives of people for small donations. This is really the only way they could do it. And people accepted. And therefore I wouldn't say that it's not collected or asked me if the rule would be to do. That's the reason. That's the reason. That's the way it works. You could do it. But here's the question that I missed a bit about in Saadi Bey's Lamasov. Yes, the claimant, the regular Kabis, the Raka, the A's, the cleanest attire, the Husha, the Laka, again. It's not proper.

14:21It's not proper. The Baha'i is the Lishmaikr. Baha'i is Barahu as Shem Zahulu. He is the Tariqah. He says Barahu and the Hulu. Right? So he's widening it. And he's widening it to, you know, Chris Pira, Barahu, I don't know what the Hulu means. That he Kabis, maybe it's serious. Yes, he might be able to concentrate on the Kyrgyzat. But I'm saying that I think the first chance is that it's coming. What about the other Kyrgyzmah? Oh, the Vannatsnakus and Liquid went through all the ashes and asked them specifically about the Michhats. I have to have heard a recording of the conversation. Oh, then he likes, you know, sounded to me. I heard he recorded in the video, but it sounded like he showed the souls and said, was it a sacred whisper? And it's a sort of aster again, is it Aiskauld and Tameka Prakana, a descendant collect specifically during Michhats. And he said, yes, if that's what you want. That's what he said. It didn't sound to me. He was like excited that you have to do it. That's what I'm just pointed out. But yeah, I would say, you know, I'm saying it's a, it's so, it's hard to enforce it.

15:24That's the problem. I sure want to say specifically during Birkha Sushman, or even a spark of collector. What does it mean? Yeah, it is a good thing to tell them that, you know, collect during Sukyudizimah, collect during Asher Valatine, trying to avoid collecting during Sukyudizimah, or even for Zairs to chance, because that would be, you know, people should be tuned in and focused on it. Okay. So, this room was spoken about Prius of Pair specifically. And it says, Barafool also, the Hulu. Yeah. Okay. No, no, it's here. Yeah. Okay. But I'm saying, usually, when a collector's there, you know, I'm saying, I mean, they, they, you know, I guess the collectives of that kind maybe made more of the disturbance and people couldn't concentrate. And I don't think, usually, when they're saying, Kha'z-Shaburhoo, that people aren't, most of the times, people aren't being able to say Kha'z-Shaburhoo. And then, that's what they do. Yeah. A collector should definitely be careful that Kha'z-Burhoo could do so. These things must be disturbing someone from saying it. What about, here's the Ritva, famous Ritva in Sukyudab Khatay.

16:24He says, that when all you speak with Miths or Patsam and Miths, it doesn't just mean that you're Patsam and Miths, right? Makes the derisht. It's, it's, it's, it's, it's off-filling on the Arabic verse, he says it becomes off-filling. So my question would be according to the words that are more problematic. Yeah, yeah. But I mean, I would have filled in that anyway. You know, I remember, you know, I remember by, you know, nothing of us vehicles with I am. And we all, you know, the people who was there, you know, in the make-wood, we've never been so before. And the thing started is about one in the afternoon, when there was a wintery day. And it just took longer than, I guess, people expected. And a lot of people started leaving right before Skiyudab Khatay. Right? But this is what I believe almost every normal person would do. And what am I going to say? Well, that's not all. That's the first. And he's right. And in the second, in the third paragraph of the book, you know, that people who are being asked again, they have stayed them of a, of a niece. I thought the minutes be more. You know, he's right about that, right? You know, it's filming that widely done. And I heard, you know, heard almost from Dr. Palkowitz. He said he was a liquid.

17:31And he was asked to testify by a general about some time of a molestation case. They said, Rob Matyshiyud Solomon was like the head of the, the young him there. And it was one of the young him. And it was like 10 minutes before Skiyud, the guy wanted to say, and I'm saying, Nukmenza. And he said, Ermastin Shiyulah, look, and he says, today there will be no men. I think the men. And he was saying that also to show the gravity of that particular situation. But in most cases, we're, you know, like in that case, like, you know, like, obviously, if there are Muslims, the values, I would be the end of the lie. It might have been a different thing. But there was like people were leaving. And there were a lot of people that stayed and people were leaving for us. You know, the government is not in. It's, you know, it's too, it's too accurate. It's too accurate. It's too accurate. It's certainly no serious to that of an infant such a situation. And perhaps like you're saying, being the red bar, there are definitely some people that would say that it's also a lameza. There's no question. But there's a question. There's a follow-up question. According to a lameza, it's a lameza.

18:31So that means the moistadok that you're giving is not a misprous. So could you, could you take it from my son? I didn't know that. I've been taking my money from I. It's a quote in the Swiss law. It's a lot of taking it from I. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I think you could rely on, you know, I didn't believe so. Yeah. I didn't have the chance to right now. The professional self with the man with the famous and I think there is both the only she's done. And I think the million is not there. I think you could rely on the, on the many not to others. You know, it's interesting in the, you know, about collecting money even during learning with the I remember in the Spanish. The value of the static paid that it know when she come in while the island was willing to collect an understand that this is the same. But in your book, when I was there, as many years ago, I don't know what's there now. Every single day there was a collection that went on during say there. Now, there's the way they did it was anyone wanted to collect in the meary she was a during say there was asked to go to the, to the guy that you believe was a bus should remember. And then she was the other way she was a bit and he would give them a time slot and he would and they would collect and when they didn't have time spots, they would different causes that he she the self like that.

19:38And if that's my, it was things like that would, would set aside. That's very interesting to me. You know, like you think a shever, you know, like a short rib that was that, you know, like the on the clear, send that mother and the device says that he said even take it. When they're learning and they said that they would have it paid and that's how they didn't make the next. But then I guess they just felt for the cause and the collective stock is anyone and they can have to anyone can come and collect that you have to stand outside and all. But they said we'll give you a we'll give you a smile and you can have that. I believe it was one to say there maybe it was one today. But could it be that learning is different because I'm saying Tom with Tyra is never the last of all the lessons. I'm not all day. No, I can't. It's true. You know, like, yeah, even though there's a famous ram that I think the middle of the game anyway, but you're right. You know, I think the middle of the game. So learning, so by learning you wouldn't have specifically.

20:38That might be too. It's not going to be different. So I have. I know it's okay. You know, I would imagine I've had it for quite a few days. Collect this coming to a managed thing. You know, they're diving and collect. I think it's a point I would assume even during. So it's in or I'll show you what you know whatever it is. I think I'm using I think in the corner. You have I think it's. And you know, and the reason why it's not that way is because the really only. It's really only time you could do it. Just open of collecting some of lunch. You know, some of the lives of large enough to people. So here's a story from the prime Glimbre. Right? He says what emotion fine students. So you said before diving. He would put money on the table and then he would take from it so that he didn't have to be interrupted. Yeah. Right. There was even though I see from it. So apart the moment. But we're the title and that's a side for crime. Can you ask him there? Ramuna on this hall of the mission. He says. So like you're hoping he says because I see to miss about the one that messed up.

21:40Right. And I'm that shield. I can call I see for me. So part of the next talk. I like I think you are. Because the aviation. But he was much better than that and entirely. I think it was. I mean, I think it sounds like it's particularly the third of the bacteria. It's a time because. You know people don't pay enough attention to. But it's saying it's a good. If it's all places to miss a minute, it's a different point. You're right. That's all. I know he says the most used to do it before. Now most of the collecting in. Of the call of a people buying viewers. And are just all always by shine or sometimes I don't have it. It's 75 80% of collecting. So the question is, you know, the the Mojave in the Shalharovian. Him in Rationun talks about common race. He says, the so is for lay bias. You rent a house for them. But more than that, you don't have to do it. It's like a Rajba. My time. When it's good. A foreigner say, was sure. He's a handsome doctor. But you don't have to worry about the rest of his life. So according to this. Part of reading of the Shalharovian and the Marsha.

22:42It would seem that. Going around collecting for a viewer. It could be that it's a hazard what you're doing. But Saddhaka is a snitch, right? What do you think about that? I think there's a. There's a there's a. If he. The. The one in the Shalharovian. And it's interesting. They seem to be discussing the same thing. But from a different perspective. There's one. How much you should give. And the other. The Shalharovian. Who is worthy of receiving? And. For when I remember, you know, then there's, you know, there's a. There's a guy about you have 200. Those who are nice. There's an ice in them. Right. And ideas to say enough money. So, um, you know, it should be in the spineless. And the spineless. And the other. But there are more. It says. And that. To somebody is collecting money to the. The mess. The one time. But that's what we need for one term. And I saw that. I don't have. I'm not in the fire in front of me. I don't remember the exact question. But this is what I remember. Ration. No one was about how much to give. And earlier. Maybe it was raised. I'm.

23:42And how much to what's. What's considered eligible for. It's. I think that's. I don't know if I remember. I remember if I remember correctly. You got to not have to show them all. You are from Columbia. He says, up to a year. There's a lot. No, there are much. There are more. There are most people on the curve. Even more than a year. First you said, you could collect for up to a year. Yeah. But you. No. He says that. If this money is the pan on. You know, I'm saying you need the pen. It's a. If the money itself, this is this is the point. What this is the most thing. If the money itself was a macawing. a kind of collecting actual money which people are going to use on a day-to-day basis. So that's for a year. But if the money is the source of the panacea, for one term, you could do that. So somebody could go ahead and collect the buy apartment building to support themselves the rest of his life? No, so that's that might be a serious event, you know, things. Enough to have. It's so off to 100 to 150. We have a person who's 200 to live in Lakewood. But no, but no, but no, but no, no, no, no, no.

24:42And it's just those of 200,000 all this is a fairly large size investment. But he can't remind everybody that he's going to buy apartment buildings. No, but that's no point. That's like, you know, a person that normally buys an apartment building a business man, you know, you take out a mortgage and or you get into that share. Or you, you know, and that's that work thing you make money that way. And, you know, you pay off the loan slowly, right? But you know, the more the muscle, the more the muscle, the more the care and for a normal something like that where somebody won't be able to be a sick for whatever it is. They won't be able to do the business. And a person doesn't mean to take some stucker money to such a type of investment is capable of that type of investing and and making money that way. And normally, it's fun with with loans with with bank loans with investment loans with whatever it is. This is that's an amount of time. So they know it's a sucker for it. The people in H is so generally speaking. So the guy collects it at down payment. He says, I'm going to take a nice mortgage from the bank. But I needed down payment of a, you know, a million dollars. I'm collecting the millions together with

25:45the other four hundred million that I get it low. And now it's five million dollar bill. That was a point. I mean, we're leaving that to the bucket. The system has to wait. You know, normally such a case. I mean, you could get up very often. In first cases, yeah, I'm going to talk about someone that's getting rich. We're talking about someone who's supporting himself. They're not so right. And he has an opportunity to make a down payment on an investment property, which would give him the day much. Normally, he wouldn't get it from soccer. Normally, he would get it from from free loans. But yes, let's say his relatives would want to do that to him. And that would set him up for financial life. And they want to know, could they write it down as fucker? Could they take it for nicer? Is that a midsword? Is that like, you know, any echo statements that, you know, your relatives come first? I would say yes. Again, it has to be reasonable. It has to make sense. The question is, that all the time, when dealing with apartments of that, it's, you know, a sensible, reasonable way to do it. But the quality is, just a bit of the quality. It's not the prettiest. They give it a young couple that would need an apartment for themselves because

26:49that, and the way, you know, the way the system is going to happen, they're going to be learning a co-local, a few days, and they're going to be doing it themselves. Don't be used to me during the workforce for whatever reason. And having the apartment already done, you know, whether they're learning or whatever it is is an important part of their long term meeting the day much. So yes, so that would be considered suck up. Even though the Schultz-Helderer seems to take clearly not like that. So, there's two parts. The question is, how much, you're not likely to do is, this isn't how much is there, you know, how much they're allowed to receive. There's two different sum under my chalk out. Right? Whether you are, now the question is who we're talking to when you're saying how much you have to give and whatever it is. You know, the chalk out is discussing different suck up organizations, coupes suckers that that that city's had. And then it wasn't volunteer organizations. And then there was, there was place for my looks, suckers, etc. And there was a certain Mahalas based on the Gouarendu Shainam about how to build any of them and how to how to support them. But that doesn't mean

27:54that suckers limited to that. I can't say that. You know, the sucker essentially is to make sure that people have the Makhliyif to do it. And if the Mahalas of the Makhliyif works in this particular way, right? And if they're asking them, I'm a Khliyif to do it. Someone's collecting for an apartment and my Makhliyif or is it Seabird Makhliyif to make sure that they have an apartment, that rationing says no. The question is, is it stuck us? Is he allowed to do it? If I want to give my sucker money that way, is the eligible to accepting suckers, is this a team of Sais Kisbah that the Scholzenar really said yes? So what's really interesting is that if it's a team of Sais Kisbah, why can't I force you to do the bit fair? Sais Kisbah? They're different good on them. They're different good on them. You know, not everything. If it's a team of the list for Sais Kisbah, why can't I force you to look higher? Not everything. Not everything is out. The key is the suck. I don't have to know. It's also a question in the office with the team also, but the Pais, I don't have to even the Sais Kisbah, I don't have to do it right now. I'm not my school year to set you

28:55up for life now. I know you have an apartment, like you're saying, you have your 朋友 just for day to day, so you find. But if I choose to do so, that is giving you day my experience here for you. So you allow to take it to Paris Stucca, right? It is considered in it for a second. So let me ask you a question. Let's see a guy comes collecting. He says, look, it's true I have a zero, but my client will pay nothing. But I could buy a million dollar bonds that'll throw off $60,000 a year and then our mom is able to live and learn well. So I'm collecting a million dollars. Would that be also a key in my Sarducca? The front end really depends on the case. It depends on case for a case. That's the case. If it's a normal, you know, say, I'm saying, but the case school for is, you know, the fact that it's making none of the four cases in either four backgrounds, right? He's a man. He's got a gentleman knife. He's all my fair family. They have no money because Kyle has no money. So he's not enough that he has a

29:56Vera and he wants a stipend. So he's collecting some of our furniture. He's going to do it. So someone would set up a care in to set up a care in that the river should go at them saying, that's the muscle. That's what's commonly done with muscle biomanus. And then the care in usually goes to Mario Fischolzion for the cast make sense. I could definitely see that being stuck. It's done in a correct sense. Well, start from Almonda. It's not from Sanana Almonda, says it all. I understand. But you know what I'm saying, but there's no really different hookahs like the biomanus. That's my own money. Somehow we feel that they should be given that security that they have the long term penance in hand and other people who say, okay, if you don't, that's what happens. So the question is why by this person are we or he deciding that he should be different than everyone else who manages to get their most serious time out without the million dollar bond, right? That's the question that would be asked. That's why you'd be, it would seem a little bit odd. But as far as couples getting married and they're just, oh, they're ready for, you know,

31:00for many, you know, as far back as I and my grandfather could remember, this was definitely at least a common and conventional way of pursuing them, the day of my story of life, by having an apartment already bought at the time of the day. Okay. Even though it all came from Saka, you know, War of the Neve. That's as I believe the rationale. Now how much should a person himself be concerned about it? You know, I'm saying to give the dollar and show it to you. That's fine. You know, I'm saying. But when sometimes it comes up when somebody, a relative, who, who Kadema, or you're alluded, somebody is an terrible, terrible street. He has to marry all his daughters. He's a hundred thousand dollars. How much that should mean? Or how much is he innocent? If you have it, or you can get it, or people are willing to give it, go ahead. If you don't have it, you can't get it. So then, my daughter will never get a sinner. Don't get married. Don't have to marry. Don't extend yourself what you could and don't make an emergency situation and have people who are actually uncomfortable

32:00giving but feel that, you know, you know, you don't have a heart attack. So that's something which that's something which I would say. That's something I would say shouldn't, should be, should be addressed, should be taken, you know, should be discussed. That people shouldn't feel that they only way they could get a sinner is by having X and X amount of money. And therefore, even though they don't see any show way how to do it, and without seriously affecting, or even with seriously affecting, the Manufa's benefic, that's kind of for the rest of the children, they're showing by their hard health, etc. But what can we do for an ainus? I don't think I'd write it all. I think you have the money, or you're able to access the money. Great. You can use it in apartments. It comes in stock, if it's stock is available. I think that's fine. But if it's not, to make it into a major emergency, whatever, you know, get married or without this. And for any, plenty, plenty of people who do not give apartments to the children and they have very happy successful marriages. This is what happens to me. I was governing in, again, I was in Shul. And a guy

33:08was collecting, he gave a speech, he got a crop, crop under the end of the year. He's marrying off his 11th child and he's collecting money for a deer of lava for the guy next to me. I guess he would say maybe more modern orthodox and he said, you know, he has a question for me if it was. He said, I only had like a few children, like four children, he said, why? Because I couldn't afford it, I'm an accountant and it doesn't pay much more and I paid tuition, I can. So he stopped it for he said, this guy has 11, maybe another 11 for all, you know, because he really, he could just collect from the seabour. Is it any Indian for me to give to doctor to a person who I did the exact opposite of it? If I didn't want to take to doctor from the seabour. With that itself, I'm saying that itself is that a time to have fewer children so you don't want to cut stuck up. I don't think that's a, I don't think that's a terrible occasion. I mean, they shall have an evidence. So, he'll have an evidence and an aliph that if a guy can afford it and it's and he wants to get married, just with your second marriage and he knows that it would cause a cause of the fact that he has new expenses, right? He should marry, he can marry somebody

34:11who he can't have children from because this way won't cause him a hoikyah so he won't cause catatas. But he doesn't say because he shouldn't collect soka. I mean, people are willing to give soka. I mean, he can always collect soka. I'm saying. I'm saying. There shouldn't be an asterisk in the shol-hawab but if he can collect soka, then I can't. It's fine. Okay. I don't think an asterisk would be one. You know, I was talking about that he's going to be like, like, you know, somebody's going to feel the emotional stress, the tension, the comfort, whatever it is, the mochakis and that's the case, right? Just not have children today that the seabour shouldn't have to support them, right? I don't think that's a reason not to have children, right? He was a high emperor. I didn't count them. Every child did it. But the case you didn't mind these though to find other Aces, you know, I'm saying, how do they marry the most and how to set them up or or maybe even don't take the rights to set them up, but then they'll let them themselves do it, but then when, but then buying sheep and aevers and hoiky, as opposed to being mature with sheep. That could be a question. But not having children. If I don't think I'll be

35:16there, yes, that's a catchment. That's all. Okay. Mark, what do you say about the new musical Flutus places all over when they do like these cow box Flutus and they left the hours? So there was now a bunch of abundance and you don't know why to do that. It's vaguely about the San Saper Road, that about music and the show, etc. It is the San Saper about not playing music during Cuba. So San Saper himself, though, he believed that it was a England, it's San the big version of it. They did this era. They shouldn't have this era in the Shoals, the Daska. And that's why they never did it. It was the Daska. That's the San Saper sheep. Many other Gideonan wrote about, you know, they were writing about the reform introducing organ playing in the show and many other Gideonan read about it. None of the other organ they were against it. None of the Gideon were against it for the same space as time. Well, the show, I don't know, like it is. The Ramos says you're a lot of music by a chupa and so on Friday night. You're a lot of playing music. Maybe it wasn't part of

36:21the, maybe it wasn't part of the, but it's also organ. Yeah, it's typically part of the downing, it's part of the Aveda. So I'm not sure if that's the time. But I'm saying it, and also what I, when I thought, you know, the question was, would he allow, yeah, would he allow musical instruments by some space to share his initials? I wasn't sure. Would that success, I think, will be that way? But also, maybe it is a difference if it's, you know, in the show, he's just using the show for some extent, rather than, you know, that Aveda is being done with the musical instruments. Yeah, I'm not, the sound space is alone. I'm not sure if he's asking that way, because time of the time the G'daylin spoke about it, and none of them said that time. So I'm not sure. You know, if someone is doing, you know, the organ was done, the copy of the Gayin, it was done on Chambis with the Gayin. There were other problems with it, and before it was to bring a ruah of reform, which ended up very, very down, and the exam was very against it. If it's done, you know, if it's done like a sleepless in us or something, it's like, which phase is for how? If it's done the same tonight, then,

37:24you know, I don't, I don't know if we're asking like the same paper, and we hold better so I say. So when I say that, you know, it's a, it is a senior. And being the scientist from, from what was done earlier is usually the daily tiring that are bothered by introducing shiner. And that's why, I always, when I was asked, I always said, you want to have the sleepless or a howl for a shaker, the shaker music, you should not do any solution or the auditorium. As a howl will have the, have the sleepless for the people that come, you do it in the stool, you're, you're making a pond of the mainstream arvada, and that we shouldn't be making shinerium that way, you know, without at least the Gayway Terry's guidance. But you want to do it on your own, that has not pond of the regular arvada, the regular thadding and the spikas of the tibre. No one has your own tibre which you feel the musical and answer. I would, I would say it's method. I would, I would ask that, you know,

38:28which is again, you're saying that you, you do what you would say, you think you should do it outside of the shiner, you're saying. Yes, and I, like an, you know, singer. But who would have like a simple hall or whatever. But in the show itself, you would say no. Of course what you do it is, you're introducing a, you know, you're, you're making a significant change to the regular arvada, the tibre, the tibre, the tibre, which shouldn't be done without, without the Gayway Terry's guidance. Except that it only wants to. Yeah. You want to. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, some saying people want to do it. They're saying they're saying they're saying they're being musical, that's the other time they do it. That's the two times that, that music comes up. And the fact that, you know, usually sleepers in the show is 20 minutes and half an hour, these things go for three, four or five hours. People, Mammesh, get the fire. You would do way with all that as fire is because of the shiner. Right. No, I would think, I would think if you want to get that as fire, it's fine. I don't think you do it in the show. That makes it kind of the name, Shema, very different tibre, which, you know, I'd be very uncomfortable. You know, I would, I

39:30would think it shouldn't, shouldn't be done. So if you want to do it, it's fine. But it should, it should be meeker that it's, you see, it's interesting. Like even Kabbalah Shabbat, if you notice, people look at Kabbalah Shabbat from the Bimanas from the Umad. Right. And Kabbalah Shabbat is the way they became completely named Sumanana, a Peele Gaddailyam of the Holy. And that, but when it first started, right, there was a new thing. It became from Siddiquim, you know, saying, and people felt that they should make Aishini in that. They should show you, this is not the real official theorem. This will feel as my own, Thilman and Al-Hadaydi, etc, is unofficial. And that's what they did at the movie. And I hope you tell me. But they didn't say, but they didn't say, she'd do it from outside of the shop. Yeah. Yeah. But now it's a little different because, you know, there were the, the, the kind of, of fast, you know, something that was very solvent, then it instituted it and it, and it went around. And there were, there were definitely, there were good Island, at least in the beginning, that weren't as nagging to it and, and didn't allow it. So I would imagine even my guess would be that they would have led her out of the shop. But it became,

40:32the Gdaily, the Gdaily page did get involved and were, and gave the hijack up to bring it in. And that's why it could be brought in. But, you know, and, and it's, you know, in a way, this is, in a way, it's a little bit more of a shun, maybe, you could call it both ways, but in a way, there, you know, they're adding a few words to some of what a shun, adding a, you know, to bring in music, which wasn't done. And I'm going to have musical instruments over here. So there's some things that were, were the thing like, why wasn't it done? It probably was the reason, the method is an etiquette. Right? Now, whether we pass, and technically that, you know, that's the sound safe, the acid, it's, the, and it should be made a reference to this sound safe, actually, and you probably know about that. But, you know, but, yeah, so that, you know, say, not alone, you know, not alone, you know, I talked to say that, authoritatively, that, and it was asking that but, uh, myself, it's not, wouldn't be correct, wouldn't be the right thing to, to bring a dictionary, most part of the, I've read this a few bit, people want to hear, they want to hear,

41:35but they should know what they should, they should have, you know, they think, if people want, and they get a sense of it, they shouldn't, they shouldn't, you know, have a comfortable place, where they could, they could, they could just fix this in the session. That's my take. Vavarig, thank you very, very much. Every vintage from the Gansal, oh my goodness, yeah. Yeah, my vintage from the Gansal and the Gansal, yeah. I spoke to Alex Felix, he was the type of a citizenship city. Okay. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you. Joining us from Archistral is Ravi Shua Fethaar. He's a Robin Ramot of the, our father's community. He's a diet, he's a, uh, but, uh, washy washes, peasants, he's the head of the Ian Institute, right? And he's the head of the, of the rabbinic party committee of the new Harazi party called Hatsibur, Hatsari D. Welcome, Ravi Shua. Herodavich, good to be back on the show. So, Ravi Shua, what is the mission of the new parties? There are many Harazi parties. What is the mission of the Hatsibur, Hatsibur, Harazi? Yeah, so the mission is to bring something new, something fresh,

42:37a different spirit to Harazi politics. And this is those internal vis-a-vis the Harazi state internally and also vis-a-vis Israel, Hidavi Israel is to establish a posture of responsibility. It's up to us to be partners to be responsible for Israel. This is especially after October 7th, we've reached the realization that the kind of them and us approach which is so dominant in the Harazi parties. It's like you're in Poland, you have to siphon as much as possible to water our own back garden. That won't slide. That won't work anymore. We need to realize that we have to add it where I pay the price of our success. The Rady Society has blossomed and flourished and grown and really established tremendous institutions. So, Rha'zadi, Yashivas, Haseedekore, Communities, whatever you want, but once you're 15% of Israel, that changes the character, that changes the duty in terms of the responsibility. It's not just about what we can gain, it must be about what we can give also.

43:40Now, what we can give includes, of course, the economic aspect, the army aspect, post-acervis-tevistemant. It's about taking that responsibility. It's a different mindset. And I think that that voice is so essential for Israel. Israel is looking for hope. And one of the main issues that's going to really color or define the contours of the upcoming election is that already issue. Everyone else is stride it. And it's been unable to find any kind of solution. And justifiably, the only solution is internal. The only way to find progress in this figure is from within. There are many voices in the Hariddi space that are trying to find that way of hope, trying to promote that approach, and it needs a political representation. But it's not just about Israel. It's also very much internal. There are so many who are looking for new angles on Parnasa. People want it able to work and to live a dignified life, both as individuals and families as communities. And need to have that backing from a political space to provide the options,

44:44to provide the education, to have an audience for this. People who want to make Aliyah, they've covered it so many. As the community graph, I get consulted with many families that call me up from America, England, English, speaking world, to speak about making Aliyah and they're looking for a space that on the one hand can provide them. For the kind of Aliyah, Aliyah both in Rochneer, Aliyah and coming to Eriddi as well with the Kutusha, but also to provide them with a space in which they can flourish on a gashmier level, with a space that they can provide the kind of balance that many in America are used to. And Israel finds it difficult to provide. And this needs support. It needs support from government. A lot in Israel depends on whether you have support from the Knesset or you don't. And this party is running to provide that. To provide the hope in turn, it is for so many who don't feel they have the representation of the existing Kareidi parties. Give me some examples. Give me two or three examples. You have who are the dominance Israeli parties today from the parties?

45:45So I'll tell you. The current Kareidi politics in Israel is dominated by the traditional division between the Sardin, the Ascanazan which is divided into two parties, the Hathidim and the Lytris. The Sardin Mishats, the Lytris' Degalateria, which was established by the Shafiq al-Frakha and the Hathidim is a good official. A good Degalateria, they run on the one common platform which is called UTJ United Tourer Judaism. Those are the existing parties. The claim of Hathidim al-Frakhaidi is that that division is not relevant. Why on earth should we display the long ethnic lines or the long lines of Hathidim? You're in a reason for that. It's because each one is vying for his own support. Each one is in the political games to bring subsidy and funding and resources and whatever it is for the private businesses, the Sardin Mishats, the Sardin Mishats, and the Sardin Mishats, the Lytris. This party is trying to transcend those divisions. Those divisions shouldn't be relevant anymore

46:47for the 21st century Israel. What we need to do is to think about the collective the collective harreigning name and its relationship with the rest of Israel. So we're sure the issue is so. The solution to having too many parties is to introduce another party. It's not about too many parties. It's parties that have an approach that doesn't represent so many harreigning individuals. You mean example? You're just an example. How does it represent? It doesn't represent as one example in the area of, again, a specific area with the education. There are tens of thousands of harreigning and we know this from Perling, who wants schools that will provide their kids with good toolkit for their future, with English, with mathematics, with an approach that will give them the strength, the fortitude, the ability, the confidence to go out of into the world and to do well. And the sorrady school system, which is the school system that is directly related to these political entities, the Sardin Mishats, and the Nielsaif of the Sardin,

47:47directly related to the politics. It denies those tools. Now we're not saying that you're not allowed to have those systems, but would like to defend them. Those schools, those institutions, they have no real writing or arithmetic, saying in the current schools or so. That basic arithmetic, you know, up until multiplication and decimal points. But that takes, in terms of arithmetic, and there's no English at all for boys. Boys don't study any English at all. And without English, and a basic core toolkit for any kind of future occupation outside the tourist base, and even inside the tourist base, this is something so core and so basic, we just need to change another basic example. And this is something which I can't speak about without some pain because we've gone through a lot over the last couple of years. Is the question of Army service. The question is, how do you defend the Ushiva students? Okay, we have in the Torah, studying in Ushiva, Yomam, Salayla.

48:50Torah, some Umanosan, these are the Torah students that we want them to stay. We want to protect them. We want them to be in the Ushiva and to allow them to thrive and to prosper and to become the Torah. That's what we want. The thing is that the Torah, they mean all of the generations. They made the following statement. They said that, you know, anyone who's not fully Torah, Umanosay, cannot reside under the protection against having to go to the Army based on being in the Ushiva. Because if everyone goes into that equation of being exempt from Army service because it's in Ushiva, then nobody deserves it. Because it becomes a fraud. It becomes a stake. It becomes a deception. It's like some of the later abominations that are in the Ushiva. And before that, the revamp seems if I'm not mistaken, the Shahogat spoke in similar language. That those who reside under that exemption and are not fully Torah, Umanosay, are right-fim. They're undermining the Torah world. This is exactly what happened in the last few months.

49:53Because everybody is supposed to be exempt, we're not ready for anybody to go into Army service. Then this undermines the literal deceit of any exemption from Army service. And therefore, we see the Ushiva guys being arrested on the streets that desire to eliminate Torah. It's creating terrible animosity between the Israeli public and between the rest of Israel. It's tearing apart the fabric of Israeli society. And it's deeply immoral. There's no justification for this. And therefore what has the very first is arguing is that we have to uphold that basic principle that those who are learning should be learning, of course. And we need to support them and uphold them. And those who are not need to be in the IDF. And we need to make sure we, from government, we, the ones who are leading the Israeli public, you can make sure that the Army will provide the kind of military framework that are acceptable and that are appropriate for these already soldiers

50:55to serve in. And that's happening, not that it's not happening, but if it would have support from within government, from connected members, who would actually do the overnight, who would speak with the Miss Raab, Habit Ahom, the Defense Ministry, and with the Army, this would do so much better, instead of saying no. And creating this very sad state that involves a lot of herelation. Instead of the thing, we need to say yes, yes, but with the right condition, yes, but with the appropriate framework. And we can. I'll tell you something else, Revedovic. We have built, we in the Faraday State over the last eight decades, in Arabic, and have built a wonderful emphasis. Today, I remember the son of a rebel in the beginning of the 1980s. He said, I look around, I'm rather my eyes and just the least. Mew, Mew, you'll hardly call Aile. Where have all of these rungs on? He said, I don't believe it. I know what I was in Europe. We didn't have a fraction of this in terms of Torah study, in terms of Halah, in terms of Kha'idim, in terms of Bati Madras, and this is 40 years ago. What we have today is an incredible edifice of Torah,

51:55of Khanset, of communities. It's amazing. But at the end of the day, we don't have all of this in order to withdraw from the rest of Klanithra. We have this in order to give to the rest of Klanithra. We need to transition from this Tabas-Nayach model where outside is dangerous to a model of a lighthouse that has big windows and looks out into the rest of of Erisrael and the rest of Klanithra and gives from all of the beauty that we've been able to build up. This is something which is a shift in mindset. And this party will represent that. It needs a representation in the politics because of the politics, very, very important. You know, it's not just about funding and it's not just about resources. It's also about the kind of voice that we protect who are we. What are we wants? What's the voice that we're protecting? This is really something which we're working towards. We understand that it will be great to see after the Shma'a. And what's the reception ban among the already leaders you speak to? It depends what you mean by the already leaders.

52:55The already leaders. You're in the same way. You're called Seabrah-Hari-D. When you talk to the Hara-Tes, the leaders of the Seabrah-Hari-D, what did I say? Well, I mean, listen, this is a sensitive question because on the one hand, you have the what's called the Gdaily Harapani. The Gdaily Harapani, of course, are also the heads of the Moretes of the political parties, right? Of the Gdaily Harapani, the heads of the Moretes of the Gdaily Harapani, and the Gdaily Harapani are the heads of the Moretes of the Goodest Throw, and some of the Gdaily Saddi-Rabani are the heads of the Moretes of the Shastra, the political party. This is not quite what you have in the United States, but over here, the religion, meaning the Gdaily Harapani, who represent religion, are also the heads in a certain sense of the political parties. Just now, there was a very public spat between Arya Derry and between Ravi Tarkyosef, at the end of which the heart said whatever it is, of the Retarkyosef said, Ravi Tarkyosef is now the head of Shastra.

53:55Is that something brings about great Kiddosh Hashem, meaning this interwoven condition of Rabhani and politics? Not necessarily, but that's the way you have it in Arya Dushra. So if you ask me, what do those Gdaily Harapani say about this new party? I don't know. I can't imagine there'll be deep enthusiastic, certainly not publicly, because this is a party which is rivalry. Again, is it rivalry, as to say, over the last couple of decades, the relatives drank the number of feet of the Serati parties. Let's speak about the Askinagi ones. Shastra is a bit of a roller coaster, so it's different. But in terms of the Askinagi parties, they haven't grown in terms of their relative strength within the Israeli Knesset. And that's a little bit shocking because in terms of their rhetoric, they've grown tremendously every year, there's a growth in the relative side of the Israeli Democratic and Israel's population. So why doesn't that have expression in terms of the political sense? The answer is because there's so many Kavaiting who are dissolutions

54:56and even they don't show up and don't so, or they vote for non-Kavaiting parties. So on the one hand, this party is going to be checking up those votes, and in that sense, it's not competing with the existing Serati parties. But you know what? I mentioned one more thing in this context. You speak about the Serati leadership, the rabbinic leadership. We know that they have always seen a certain private public divide, meaning what can you say publicly? What can you say privately? I think Hillary Clinton mentioned it in one of her controversies about Wall Street. She quoted it from Lincoln, I think. That some things have to be done in private, to ensure that you don't have a public backlash, those things that you need to negotiate with in the downcofaces. There's something similar going on in Arizona, and you'll know about it. There's something that you have to take a public to this among. You know, my brother, when Rabbi Kate established my brother, she reflux told him, the publicly I'm going to come out against you. And privately, it might be a very good idea. And with Shlim Azamun told him, you should just do it. And you might have a backlash, but it's about me to be done.

55:59I think over here also, you know, so many have spoken through Goodell Israel today, who have said for example on the army issue, that of course those who are not letting EEP be in the idea, not doing so, continue the situation in which Israel is torn apart, that there's a Hello Simpson line. It's a very, very problematic situation. However, publicly, that statement is very difficult to make for a number of reasons. So I think that this party is representing position that are very strongly espoused by many Goodell Israel, and certainly the Rebanis that I've also spoken to, no, not my own Rebanis, and therefore it's definitely doing, definitely going to be espoused in policies that are then held by many Goodell Israel, and certainly popular in the Redis fleet. So that the sufficient to bring the number of votes needed across the thresholds, afternoons, the concept, Israel's thresholds to get into the connected is a high bar. It's not an easy part to reach. Is there a possibility that if you crack X number of votes

56:59and you take it away from the other parties, which you don't have the threshold that you needed to get to see, the fact that the already parties will be losing seats? It's a good question. The question that many are asking is not the one that's specific to the already parties, but more to the right wing block. Nowadays politics in Israel is divided into the two blocks, the center left, what they like to call block and the right wing block. And one of the questions that it often asks is, are you not afraid of wasting votes from the right wing block? But is it a similar question to one that you're asking? Are you not afraid to waste votes going to the already parties? And the answer is well seen two weeks time. I this party, again, I'm not running for office and the Revenue Committee. But from my many conversations with a person leading the party multilightner, also a town that's started in our program at the EU Institute, really, one of our star alumni is really a wonderful person and very, very capable of really leading the challenge in a wonderful way.

58:05He's done great work and made damage already on the military level, and now he's made a transition into the national level. And from my many conversations with him, there is no way that we will be wasting votes. If we see that there isn't a direct way of entering into the connector, then you can merge with one of the other parties. There's always an opportunity to merge up until the deadline for giving in the party left in a couple of weeks time. And then we'll make that decision whether you want to go all the way or not. Even if you want to go all the way and then you see a not making it, and you can always withdraw your party before the election day. And then you don't waste any seat. So we're not going to be wasting any seat. I think that's a matter of national responsibility. It's irresponsible to waste the waste votes. Not to waste votes. I mean to waste the waste votes. Especially when it can be 10 to 1000 of those you can't allow those to go to waste. What are you going to, how do you respond to those that say? SAS Party has a lot of ideas, they're starting to get. Bigel has, I don't know, I guess, Rabbi Landau.

59:08And Rabbi, I forgot the name, but he's a Slovakian having it. So make it here now. Well, the boots of Oscar. Yeah, the boots of Oscar. And then the season has to get reber and the Dalzer Reb, etc. So they have quote unquote all these name for the asylum. And they said, you know, you're sort of splitting off from them. Like, who are your accoutrements of the asylum? How would you respond to that? Well, with two responses. First of all, the private public thinks this is not a secret. It's a for better or for worse. In our age, it's very difficult to keep such things secret. And there's been so many reports of private conversations with great G'dayli Tera and G'dayliya's Moirim and so on, who in private is now positioned. That are exactly the positions that we're taking on. And of course, in public, they don't necessarily have the same positions. So we are in a certain sense doing their work. By the way, this has been the case for me.

1:00:09Several conversations that I've had with G'dayli Tera from from the name rack. And the response has been this and this is not something that I can support. I may ultimately even have to come out against it. I hope not, but it's the right thing for you to be doing. And this has come up more than one. And this is also one of those pieces, albeit on the largest many Rampani out there, who are a thousand positions that are somewhat different. And including my own Rampani, and we have different versions of Dasturators, not one Dasturator out there. You know, that they used to be in this maybe age of refhash, you know, refhash is the epitome of the kind of absolutist Dasturators. But, you know, this is not the case, even among the two invisible mentioned before, of Landon, one hand, of Moshihela, on the other, Bukhsli, and both great G'dayli and Mintera. But this huge divide between them, on many issues, that we didn't necessarily hear about in public, but there's definitely there. And, you know, people who know are well aware of the divide between them. And every member of the party, anyone who's involved,

1:01:12has consulted with the Zinnra Bay, with Zinnra Vane, and taken counsel from them. And therefore, this is something which there's ample space, that there's ample space for this new party. It's something which is necessary, it's something which is required. Israel needs it. We need it internally. It's something which, and very well, I'll point this out, there are four Dukhari Dikakis. This is one of them. I think it's also the strongest, and the one with the best chances of getting in, and the one that has the kind of best infrastructure. But there's another three that were established in this election cycle. One of them is a he, which is a Saudi part, the Tariq al-Sahat, is at the design, for the revirum of Abbas Al-Sahat. Another party is Paul Takahal, which is another kind of general, Kareedipati, rivaling the other Kareedipati. And another one is the extremist party, Sebas Chakal, which is more along the lines of Pelik Duresh, but why is it that all of these, in a very untreated and devoid, have all sprung up at the same time. I think the answer is that,

1:02:13sometimes there's a certain, what we call, a tight-guised, certain spirits of the time. An spirit of the time lends itself to these phenomena and comes together that somehow consolidate each one in its own stays, each one with its own special character in nature, but they reflect the common side guys, like they have in science. They have different researchers and different continents, sometimes working on the same issue, and they reach the cost of a breakthrough together, something three or four, and either they'll all get the Nobel Prize, or one of them will write the article, or they'll write it all together, whatever it is, but the same thing here, there's a certain spirit of the time that requires these new entities, these new political parties to be there and to project a different voice, to project a new voice. It really seems to me that this is something which is deeply necessary, that Israel, that the Jewish people need this new voice, and the politics is one part of it. Of course, there are many other areas, like every kind of tight-guised movement, there are many areas in which this is expressed,

1:03:13whether it's in the media, or in the education, or in the culture, and in many ways, and politics is another way in which we're finding that this new tight-guide is being expressed. Do you know that last week, what is time is? Who is a very famous, a very singer? A very singer is like the top-how-ready singer in Israel, multi-stimates. He's sang at the wedding of Omar Adam, which is a very, very famous, very secular, is very singer. These are not things that we've seen before. Okay, I mentioned culture, so I'm mentioning this at the cultural point. Things are very, very much in slugs, in motion. There's a tight-guide, which is bringing us to entirely new phenomena that we hadn't been used to in the past, and they require a new educational approach. They require a new sense of community. They require a new internal motion between the serenade and between the state of Israel, and they require a new political voice. They require this, and I think we're really living in that kind of transitional time. Well, I'm sure thank you very much for your time,

1:04:15and you're certainly making lives interesting in our control. There's a narrative about it. I think that, closer to the seventh, this is our basic duty to really think about how we're going to face the existential challenges that Israel faces together. We can't do this if each of us is vying just for ourselves. If we in the Israeli space are really thinking about ourselves, or if others in Israel are really thinking about themselves, we have to do this in a way that can bring a large percentage. A hundred percent is too much. You'll always have extremists on each side that won't be able to participate, but we need to think about. And by the way, Israel is ready for us. I really think they're ready for the Karaden. Twenty years ago, 25 years ago, the concept of a civilized system would have been unthinkable. Israel is much more traditional, much more from much more open to integrating the kind of values that we have built and consolidated over the years in the Karaden space. We just need to translate them. We need to translate them into Hebrew. We have to be able to be in conversation with the rest of Israel.

1:05:16And how Leveder, we should be able to create a hidden symptomame and bring the kind of ticking gobbels that all of us need still urgently. Okay. We're sure. Thank you very much for your time. We're super, super, super. Super, super. We're very, super. We're going to you and all of our wonderful listeners. We should have a serious service. I'm being told the world. Joining us from Jerusalem is a Gytre exeved Kindress. He's an MK, a member of parliament in De Galatira. He's been in De Galatira for 30 years. He was mayor of the entire vice mayor of Jerusalem. And Rebel Yashin is the one who has to go political. Welcome, Rebiet. Thank you. You're welcome. What do you think of the new party that's been created? I know Rebiet Shorfephah called me to talk about it. Hatsuburah Haradi, give us your thoughts about it. The truth of the matter is the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the playing with calling on an exes oil. But we have a challenge in exes oil. And since then, I would say metal.

1:06:16And that's for the last 100 years. Okay. When you have a, it's a little confusing. Okay. And one side you have a juvenile, a show that coming back to the cell, a little matter of going up in the cell, being developed in the cell. But the slightest movement is a, is a secular movement. Okay. But it's confusing because it's the most lovely thing and the thing that every Jew, the way to war is you shall line out to the cell. Right. And of course, starting out to the cell. So the way to relate to it and the way to how to deal with it and to how to keep on and the, the, the figure of how to deal with it is a way that started by the chasmation went by the earliest oil later is having the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, the, yes, helped by the government, but you may try it. Oil and my shirt is the way it's a continuing the, the, the, the, and it's run by the head, by the heads of it, the, the, the, the, the, the, the early soil. Okay. So of course there is challenges, there's problems,

1:07:17there's things and how to deal with it. There's something that's being guided again, by, it's your early soil over the years. And that's the way that people are eating is in this stage. They are today. You know, they're not tearing their to self to spend the spin. We're talking about 600,000 kids that are learning in the, in the terraces. And that's it. So we're talking about hundreds of thousands of the, the, the, the, the, the material you see this, and right, it's just the numbers that they have today. You're talking that are the, the, the age of 18 and 27 they're talking about 90,000 that are in your show. It's the way we got to it. And it was accomplished is by listening to the guidelines of the values. So and they run the, they run the battle, they run the, the guidelines and the work. It's not a question of democracy. Everyone does what he wants. And if we would do that, I don't know what there wouldn't be where it is today. It's a very simple. I mean, to try to change that is not understanding that that's how it worked. I was, I was, I was asked, what do you think party had Seabor al-Gharade? Yeah, what I think was a lot of parties in the

1:08:18night to show. Yeah. Not the first party. You know, it's a film that I think is 30, 40 parties and running real life. But he, I mean, he, he feels like he's, there's a big part of the Haradi element that feels not represented. We feel that the Haradi element is built on one thing. And that it's, we did like I said, dollar to be with the other thing. Okay. Like it's built on one, and one concept. Like there's a battle going between us and groups I wonder to be more pluralistic. And between us and there is a battle. And the battle is run has a headquarters. The headquarters is going so. Okay. Whoever thinks that he has better ideas, he could join the Likwiki joint bank. There were any other parties. It's not that, nothing wrong with that. It's a shame to have that. That is the idea of Haradi. And you want to change the idea of Haradi? And okay, so there will be no Haradi. It's not the first one that tries to change the idea of Haradi. But that's the whole idea. The whole idea. There is a whole concept of something.

1:09:19There's nothing personal. You know, I mean, you know, I mean, people want to change the system of the Haradi element in the state. I would say about 100 out of 125, 18, I said, okay. So other party wants to do it. Right. And there's that running, but you feel that they don't have that side on the side. No, nothing. It's not a question. Not if you have a dust. The question is who runs the city? Who runs the show? Who's my boss? Okay. Who does my primary school point? Okay. Who tells me what to do every morning? It's not that I ask Dastur and I consult with Dastur and I speak to Dastur. It's not the idea. The whole idea is that we run by Delhi. So there are both. Maybe different than America. Maybe the board is the board in the directors in the Gaudet. And that's the source of no board in the directors. The board of directors is Dindriya Tsu. Legally, they own the party. They hit a different concept. Right. And there's a whole idea. If it's fair, it's the same. There's no change because there's no difference between then and other parties that are in the concept

1:10:21that they have better ideas on how they do have to live. So for me, it's not curious. They say almost 40% of young children today are raised in Israel. No, at 30, I would say between 25% and 30% of the first graders are living in the country. Okay. So let's be half a main of the ratio. Look ahead. 20 years. The 50% of the earth is strong as high-rate. I mean, do you see that the country will be able to defend itself with 50% of its people that are in part of the military industrial system? You know, I want to quote two things as the parties that were been living in the course of our, okay? First of all, we have to remember and we see it. I would say on a daily basis, even at the hour or night. So it's a very nice thing, like a whole bunch of ancient surnames, a Dachshund. The way it works in that, it's not like an ancient sign. It doesn't work by a person. People are playing that you did it. They're not financially and not the security.

1:11:22Okay? For changing one day, the president dropped the sign and he's stopping the word. He ran it stopped. And he finally going for it. Nobody understood what the political has been what that he did that he went with it. Okay? The same thing you know, a little bit more than the other way. We woke up one morning in San Caspera and all the security, the billions of dollars that were put in in fences and he cameras and that didn't work. So first of all, it doesn't work. That's absolutely, I'm saying it's Aguidoba. Okay? But we have to remember one thing. That's a main priority of the Manashite family that's one of its basically Aguidoba. Okay? You just ask with the question you ask. Okay? 30% of the first 30% is right. We have to remember that when we started early, we started in 19th soil. It was that kind of English 90s. If you're talking about 25, 30% of the first graders over the age of 75, you're talking about 2% better for any of the nerds. So anyone that would run a company or run anything and it works. Right? You do it from 2% to 25% to 30%.

1:12:24You don't change it in the middle. Right? You're taking your risk that what you have and when you accomplish the tool today could change. You could come in big comments. I have better ideas. But this works. It works at a became a return. That's the syrup. The Saraje population is growing rapidly. It's a rare fashion. Right? The presence of the range will be soon at one part of our sister all. We'll continue to learn fiber and the other part will fund it and defend it. And that's mad. We'll be Derrah Hatheva. We'll continue. So what is your honest vision of our sister all in 25 years? By the way, 25 years goes very quickly. I learned from our sister all the time. How was the bottle? It was 35 years ago. It went up. I can verify it. You know? In other words, what's your honest vision? 25 years. Who works? Who serves? Who pays? Only 50% of the population. It basically is natural. OK? Because I work and my colleagues work and a lot of friends of mine work. OK? I'll advise. There's not enough girl in the lectern to serve. There should be more. OK? Not everybody's in trouble.

1:13:25Yes. He admired them. We put them on top of us. They're the most important people. They're the misdeclinist. It's so OK. The misdeclinist is not whoever has a better car. Whoever's more in trouble. Not whoever has had a nice house. So whoever's more in trouble. Is that culture that not everybody could agree with them? Part of it could be, but I'm very happy to be part of that culture. OK? Does that mean that everybody's in trouble? Unfortunately, no. If that means everybody's in the asylum, unfortunately, no. OK? But to say that they're holding us, they're keeping us as not sure. So you think that at that point, there will be enough people working and not people fighting for the Maserati community? I hope there'll be more people learning than today. I really hope. So if there is, and who's going to serve, and who's going to fight? Maybe there'll be less than the service of fight. If there'll be more people learning, who promising it's not, or we're about a back-and-backed version of the world. People, we have derechate. Wars, God, wars, God, by a derechate of 20.

1:14:26I think we should abandon derechate. I saw the big, the big, the brilliant, the brilliant, the winner of the show, they knew the world was going to start off over seven, and they were members of the territory. They didn't. So we should abandon derechate. We have to do what we have to know. I didn't say that. First of all, the tevhas do you? Because people are, unfortunately, like I said, I didn't make it to stay in trouble, unfortunately. But we're going to have to go, we'll be stone-crow. I didn't make it. And a lot of my friends didn't make it, OK? But they're out there working. They said they already merged a calendar on their funeral. I don't think it's true. So I'm just about in line. Since 25 years, there'll be a lot more people working, a lot more people fighting from among the charade. Of course, because today's 20 charade working, you've been there out of 100, and there's going to be out of there to 200, and these 40. I mean, it's a record of death. Can you believe that we have to prepare for the Tevhas? Yes, but I don't think it's true. What do you mean?

1:15:26Do I have to prepare for 25 years? So now what knows are you going to have? Bring me the person, the analyst, the cartone, how the economy in Israel is going to look like it's 25 years, and what are going to be the challenges of security in 25 years? He's going to be doing that. I understand. I'm going to see it. It's a joke. You know, he's not even a joke. Because nobody knows that what type of army you're going to need in 25 years. You want the rest to do whatever you're going to need. You're going to build it. What's his type? I just want to repeat the question. And in 20 years, it's 50% charade. What's 70% charade? What can happen? I feel comfortable not answering the question, and I'll tell you why. It sounds weird. I'll tell you why, because I was interviewed. You said before I was a bit of a big star. I was interviewed in 1998, 1997, and they explained to me that in 15 years, the numbers that they're raising, Israel's going to collapse financially. You know what? Very interesting. In 2013, Israel was doing better than ever before financially.

1:16:29So we went through this one time. Then they said in 2030, that's going to happen in 10 years, so now, when in 2026, Israel's doing financial better than anyone else. That's a weird lesson in the other country. I'm saying this basically, I thought, is this security? Is this security challenges? Of course there is. So they have to be said. The reason that there's not charaded in the army is not because you should have welcomed them low to the army. Because the army starts drafting charading that left you, okay, in the beginning of 2000. They haven't once started doing it. After the Lord that were trying to pass on security, is that wherever the news service would be at the stone, wherever's not any news service, there used to be, just like I myself, in 1998, when I left the coil, I joined the army. The question is not security, and the question is not the finance and the reserve. The question is, this is going to keep on a total of worlds or not. Those are the challenges, and those are the reasons that are people that are attacking us. People that confuse, they think they're attacking us because they want, if no people in the army, or they want, they want to change the culture.

1:17:31And the mid-seasons, I expect these things would maybe be questioned seven to 80 years ago. The mid-seasons, look, they were right. But if you talk 80 years after the Holocaust, all 100 cheaters in West O'Aingia were killed, except for one. And Mary, you're the chief of that man. Right, puns is just a bug. Everybody was wiped out. We're a bar and came from some clests. Everything was killed. Why? Because we're not signed by the Hunts. Yes. And if we don't have a physical way, do you another do it yourself? But I'll give you another reason. Yes. I'm in the Paschusky subway. Because it was a scholar, and because there was other groups who were seeing this in a scholar, every form. St. Paschusky subway, it says that that's it. That's how it's going to be. As an American, I just find it hard to understand. Again, 80 years post-Halacoste. I mean, what wouldn't have we done in the Holocaust if we could have had anti-tank missiles and anti-tank missiles? It's so hard for me to grasp it. Like, did they learn about the Holocaust and the issue, is it all? I'm not a Zionist.

1:18:32How this friend from the Hadam and David Ben-Gurah is on set in the... I don't think that I think if I would take, okay, any child from the Soviet Union, any child from the secular family, I believe, okay, and I didn't check it. Did they make feelings? No, a lot more about the Holocaust than anyone else around them. So, it's not like that people don't know. I think there's more immigrants about Holocaust than the secular citizen who is in the Caucasian. But you understand the lack of understanding that somebody like me has? People come from Holocaust backgrounds, they say, the blind issue, we were sheeped. As here we're giving the opportunity to say, you're surrounded by hundreds of millions of Nazis and everybody's saying, no, let's not protect ourselves. It's just so much fun. No, no, no. What we think is what we're learning and we're going to read in the next week's past. We think that if you're going to have the national covers, it's not on space. I hope that's the way we come back there to sell.

1:19:33But it didn't really. I always say the secular members of the class said it didn't work because 90% there were not... We're not there back then. You're not going to get someone. You're not going to be. You know what we're talking about? This is not working. It doesn't work. It doesn't work. It doesn't work. There's a way you don't need to know it. Yes, I am. But why do we... Why do we have to know? Why do we have to have let's try and let's just know that we had a deal. A lot less. A lot less. Even by numbers. A lot less. Hungarians. Let's learn about all that. No, we're 90% five. No, Poland. So right. And Poland and then the 90% one. No, no. But yes, Poland was 50% and Hungary was 70% from. You think let's not... Let's stroke Tava out the window. In here. There's a hole in the water for us. There's a straw. That's what I said. That's a straw. Because it's not the straw. That's the straw. You know, I said in the Knesset there is no Kavanaugh. So let's just do the Knesset there. I'm asking you a question. Could some of us fear of mourning happen by Teva? Doesn't it really sense?

1:20:33Let me show you. What does it make sense? You don't have dollars. I'm thinking of the Knesset. There's pretty billions of dollars on the canvas and the fence over there, the security over there. And what did they put over there? What did they put a cell in 10 minutes? Well, over 10 minutes and not only that, the best influence in the world couldn't even wake up until the afternoon. People were giving out all kinds of theories. What happened? But that was the best news. It was in so many names. We're blind. And we get up the next morning. And the biggest threat that everybody took out Teva, you know, those supposed to be between 3,000 and 10,000 people killed in a 10-minute second. I understand. I guess you're thinking about the hands flow. People don't maybe kill them. So you just use that. And I'm asking you a more than that. You're talking about the defiance. Are you talking to the fine? You're talking about the fine. They give us flints. I told you, 1998, they explained the more already we're going to grow, the less it's going

1:21:34to be the country that it collapsed. It was supposed to collapse in 1013 already. It's somebody in your family, or your country, you're getting to sick. You tell them to go to a doctor. So you say, eight, Eric's are sharing that. Shemily, check up on. The patients are showing us the truck in Teva here. You sick. Learn some more. Gamar take a pill. They're exposed to hospitals. There's no Teva here. You go send to a doctor. I'll tell you the question. The question is its question of priorities. It's question of priorities. It's not that they do both. You don't do both. But if it's going to end up, go, we know from it's easiest. You know that. And also in Europe. The minute that I remember you said, the lunatic wasn't strong. And then remain the next generation. And not so with them. And not so with them. And it's proved for the last 80 years more than anywhere else. Okay. I mean, in another place, you could see it doesn't work. It doesn't work.

1:22:34It doesn't work. That's a question. What's that? It's a question of priorities. It's a question of priorities. It's not a question of not having a. Of course, I'm out. You said it to connect with them and make sure we have everything to security. Of course, I'm out. You said up plans to make everything available for that. I don't think the connect with the committee is a student. Okay. I said the connect with the. And don't worry. These tab is a question of priorities. One thing is very clear. And we see it through last baby years without oil. I'm sure this. And the. And the. And the. You can. You can. You can't have a few. There's no future. There's no second generation. Okay. And if the price. No second generation. There's no. Of course, not no. There's. Of course, not. There's. That's what it says. That we're not going to have a second generation. It's. But how is a cook next to an aunt. They're growing. Yeah. The festival. I'll tell you. Yeah. And I'll tell you about the. They're becoming a lot more. Sorry.

1:23:34You know that. The. The mountain of the. You should have bought from over here that are postponing their. The draft the last 12 years. Triple. So the end of the day, there will be 70% from 30% prior. But their. But they're. But they're. But they're. They'll watch out. And 30% will beat the. That's not what I said. That's not what I said. I said it's a question of priorities. I have to make sure. I'm going to be. I'm. Whatever could be done when I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. Wrong. Yeah. I'm. I'm. And I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I'm. I don't want to be. I'm. Covering the end of my greed. You. Is. Chef over there.

1:24:34Mother. We have too many zoning out here. Mother. T Diregona is man who was. Sir, father. One of those anti почetti. Um. Where? I don't know. And then. And then he said, in America, you can have to, if it means that that's the only way to function as a achiever, you can have to do that. So they introduced English and my stress that, which is high-light, which is a terrible was terrified would be the end of American industry. But in retrospect, American industry has flourished so much because they were able to live in America. And so, so today you have somebody told me, I have a question. I heard this from a funny word ago. He's the president of our good today. He's happened to be by us and he said, he was by bankruptcy hearing in Delaware. And he said, and the judge said, we're going to stop the lunch. We have an Aaron Hepatist. He said, two lawyers from the one side representing the bank. And he himself took out Oswald Gamores and started learning Oswald.

1:25:36So the ability, the tyrant in America to flourish despite the fact that it recognized that he's speaking English here for the most part. You should not focus. That's in the position he's made us. Maybe in the base matter, she's spoken to the Shackuan brothers. And we spoke here, you know, but people grow up with English and they grow up reading English papers and the federal. And American, you know, the shite is booming. So we still know what I'm saying. Amazingly, you know, the shite has been able to flourish here and still live with the state of the United States. You know, you didn't say any of the shite world. And no, the state of the United States, I want to tell you something that's really the bluff. The state of the United States, they don't teach in Lakewood in the seven, just not this is English, right? And Lakewood is only elementary in the high school. Okay. Okay. Now, I want to tell you something because in these dope states, it's going to be nice to sell. And in the state system, we're simple today. That's one of the biggest bluffs. They're staking like in southern Canada. That's what the United States, the Kites Moi, teachers, English and all their schools.

1:26:36Okay. And they have all can match 70% of the chemicals in the Kites Moi. And all the schools they speak in, they're teaching was in the Ghazanish was not here. They had to say the same thing the primaries of the United States told me just now. Ghazanish did it over here 80 years ago. The same exact thing. They teach English to the Ghazanish. They teach Hebrew and that was that's supposed to learn in Hebrew. They're learning in Hebrew. English, I don't know, was the Ghazanish was later. I don't know. I don't know history so much. Okay. But they teach English to the Ghazanish. They teach English and in the 70% of the education is for English. Ghazanish opened the Gator in the neighborhood without, okay. Passbar and not only that, they made sure they won't even take any money. They won't take any until they don't take any money from the government. And the open garden outside the Bitterkut, when it's high. And all the other places that did teach in math and English. Okay. So yes, that's where we have the early soil. Just like what you said, we're in the problem start. When people start privately and they say what? We know we have to speak and we decide that we understand better than Ghazanish because

1:27:39I'm saying we're in a real battle. It's not it's not something that it's the era. We're talking about a battle. There's people that are sitting there, okay. Officers that are sitting in the treasury minister, okay. And in the in the courts, okay. Lawyers that are sitting in offices that want one thing. They don't want any already here. Nice to serve. That's what they want. You know, the only way to destroy it is to close down the, and to close down the issue. That's what they're looking for. That's nothing to do. Not with business, not with English, not with these. And that people are amazed and they don't know the system. But what do you want? The only thing we're talking about in this specific, hey, they're about to teach all some of our English. They told them guys outside over here. There's other people that are looking at this side. We're going to start going to have a private education. And that's the only way that we survived that battle. We're talking about a battle. Hey, they got up and they said, be one, deductions, it'd be a nation without terror. If it wouldn't be a battle, you're right. We're in a table, smith, we're in a war.

1:28:40We're in a battle. That's what people, maybe from fires on under the scenes. We are in a battle. When I come to the treasury minister and they say, I want to upgrade the Chinooka in the seminaries that it should be more professional. You know what the answer is? Don't you dare. We're trying to close you down. If you'll make it more professional, it's not going to close down. So they don't need people to get better jobs. They don't want this to be what they call these people that are acting different during their get-go-derner. That's what they want. And that's what people can appreciate. And that's why I'm saying, we're talking about a battle that has to be run with people that have the talent and understands who we're dealing with and who are dealing with and not even, not falling to their places that try to trap us. Is it possible that the Supreme Court or the other friar that concerned about what happens? They don't believe in the answer. And Ereza Shemeliketha, but I can put Tava here. They believe that there is Tava and they're just looking before it and they're saying, what's going to happen? No. No. 100 percent.

1:29:40I can't explain to them. You know why that's true? I know that. I've explained that for a guy I know that. But you know why I know it's not true? Because they were the V. They didn't know 80 years ago that that's what's going to happen. They're running the same battle for 80 years. They're running the same battle for 80 years. A lot before when it was 30 percent. A lot before when those would have been. You have to use Israeli guys. They're doing it from the friar. Is that the average? I know. I was a radi guy. I was a radi guy. I'm not saying that an average, a radi guy in those words. What we're discussing now all the details. Even an average, a radi guy is not in total details. So a friar guy is a sure enough. There's a group of people that they start this, the state of Israel. They found that in the country and they're fighting for it. And that's why they were demonstrating a lot before October 7th. When they didn't want they were doing the same thing. You know, we don't have to go so back before October 23. When the army was trying to close down units and be a spoiler army.

1:30:42They were doing the same thing. They didn't start it in October 23. They didn't start in October 7th. They started it before. The Supreme Court ruled on it three years before him. When the army was saying we don't want people or people were closing down units. They were going, we were going, we were going, we were working, we were in debt. They were saying the same thing. So that's a proof that that's not the idea. There is a list. Well, I've spoken to boys. Some of us who say they were in Gaza for 400 days. I've spoken to married people who said that they were in Gaza. So way longer they should be but there's nobody to replace them. I mean, the dominant I was told guys that said, look, I didn't want to be there. There's just nobody to replace. Yeah, they all lying. No. I just said that the issue is not death. I didn't think there's no security problems after. So I asked you one thing. Why'd you been going on in court and then they can access for 20 years? A lot of people were over seven. These people and guys, now you're talking about 24, 23 and 25, right?

1:31:44Those of you who are talking about, right? Let's talk about this. Okay. If you look back at the United States 20, 30, 80 years ago, we don't recognize the same politicians are dead. The long gone, the issues have changed. It just seems that there's some conspiracy theory by some group of politicians that have been touted for 80 years. It doesn't feel like the way politics works. Politics in the United States changes every two years, every four years, every six years. The concept is the theory of conspiracy theory. That's from the people make them all fries, et cetera. Here's the ultimate Iran. I meet them every day. Of course it is. I meet people every day. No, I meet people that read. It's not about this. It's not about the members of the country. Members of the country are not involved in it. I want to be honest with you. The members of the country are not involved in anything I spoke about. And anything I spoke about, I'm telling you Isaac, there's no idea what I'm talking about. No idea. I think I have no idea what I'm talking about.

1:32:45Then he got so sure I have no idea what I'm talking about. And I would be shocked to what people know what I'm talking about. They have no idea what they're talking about. It's not that, but that's not a run. And if you, that's why there's so many big demonstrations in 20, 20, 22 and 23 against the legal reform. Because those people know what I'm talking about. There's a three-four people know what I'm talking about. The people in the legal department know what I'm talking about. The people in the charging industry are over here that are not under the minister. That's not like in America. In America politicians have changed. This is the change. Over here, there was a big topic by the name of Nakhambedyan that he was mechadish, oldies, officers, and less than in their places. That's just that it's not changed. You could change elections. You could change by ministers. You could change anything you want. You could change the country. I have nothing to do with those people. There's nothing to do with those people. There's people that are running. It's not about politicians. It's a big mistake. It doesn't work like that. People be right. So America doesn't work like that. And that's why, OK? And I've told you the whole system over here was different. That's why people keep understanding why the promise of not self.

1:33:47The policy, the initials, not self. OK, it's not. People want to. OK, so are you going to next election? Everything's going to be solved. The answer is no. That's why we're by our leg with willing to do all kinds of fishing laws. Because you know, there's not going to be some kind of temporary law. Because it's not going to be a final solution. We have to keep on going. And being with Hanykhan open another comment there and another each of us. And that's going to help the end of the end. OK, the decision that it's over, first of all, technically I'm telling you, I meet these people every day. Just say the middle band is going to have to be changed. It can't be clear. And it's also not going to happen in one day. And no, it's a battle that we have to run every day, every hour. And that's what we're doing. We're keeping on doing. We have guidelines about to do it. And that's what it's like. It's an honor to have you on with us. OK, I love us. Thank you. Thank you. I love you. I love you.