Loading...
Loading...

Thousands of federal prosecutors have been fired or have resigned from their roles since Pam Bondi took over as Attorney General. She has made no secret of weaponizing the Justice Department to pursue Donald Trump’s vendettas. One of those prosecutors is Troy Edwards, who quit a senior national-security position in the Eastern District of Virginia. As an assistant U.S. attorney in DC, Edwardshad won convictions against members of the Oath Keepers for January 6th-related offenses. Edwards is also the son-in-law of the former F.B.I. director James Comey, and, when the Justice Department indicted Comey on grounds widely seen as flimsy, Edwards knew he had reached his red line. (The charges were quickly dismissed, though without prejudice.) The New Yorker’s legal correspondent Ruth Marcus talks with Edwards about his decision to leave, how he broke it to his family, and why he thinks other prosecutors should not follow his lead.
Further reading:
New episodes of The New Yorker Radio Hour drop every Tuesday and Friday. Join host David Remnick as he discusses the latest in politics, news, and current events in conversation with political leaders, newsmakers, innovators, New Yorker staff writers, authors, actors, and musicians.
New Yorker Radio Hour listeners, we want to hear from you. We have a few questions about the show and how you listen to it. The survey takes about twenty minutes, and your feedback will help us make our podcast better. Take the survey here.
This show is supported by ODU.
When you buy business software from lots of vendors, the costs add up and it gets complicated and confusing.
ODU solves this.
It's a single company that sells a suite of enterprise apps that handles everything from accounting to inventory to sales.
ODU is all connected on a single platform in a simple and affordable way.
You can save money without missing out on the features you need.
Check out ODU at ODOO.com.
That's ODOO.com.
That's pure automotive joy.
I'm Peter, the owner of Musclecar Junior.
It started as a hobby, then I started posting about it.
Before I knew it, I built a business for storing muscle cars on Facebook Marketplace,
and the community of car lovers on Instagram.
Today, new customers send me what's app messages from all over.
Not bad for a hobby.
Learn how meta helps over 35 million American businesses, like Peter's Grow, at meta.com slash community.
United Health Group is bringing in-home treatment directly to patients,
closing caregabs, identifying risks earlier and improving patient outcomes.
In 2025, patients received over 19 million home visits.
Learn more at unitedhealthgroup.com slash commitment.
This is The New Yorker Radio Hour, a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker.
This is The New Yorker Radio Hour. I'm David Remnick.
Since the start of Donald Trump's second term,
it's estimated that over 300,000 federal workers have been forced out of their jobs
or have left voluntarily.
And notable among them were thousands of federal prosecutors in the Justice Department.
These are generally ambitious, driven lawyers,
who could have been making much more money in the private sector.
The Attorney General Pam Bondy has made no bones about putting the Justice Department on political missions
and quite a few career prosecutors just could not abide that,
including a man by the name of Troy Edwards.
I remember it's still seared into my memory.
My dad would wake up in the morning at about four something in the morning every morning
and iron his uniform.
That hiss of that iron is still seared into my memory
because I remember thinking, man, I want a job where I get to go serve
and I care so much about it that I'd wake up at four in the morning and iron my uniform.
And the National Security Division gave me the chance to do that.
As an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Edwards prosecuted major January 6 cases
helping to win convictions against members of the Oathkeepers.
He later served as Deputy Chief of the National Security Section
in the Eastern District of Virginia.
And when he resigned last year, that made headlines.
Partly because Troy Edwards happens to be the son-in-law of James Comey,
the controversial former FBI director who holds a top spot on Donald Trump's enemies list.
Edwards spoke with the New Yorker's legal correspondent Ruth Marcus.
So, Pam Bondy comes in as Attorney General.
She sends out a memo advising you and your fellow prosecutors
that your job is to execute the views of the President of the United States.
The President comes to the Great Hall of Justice
and gives a speech denouncing many things,
including the scum prosecutors who had vindictively gone after him in the previous administration.
What's your response to all of this? What are you thinking?
That we had a job to do.
All of that can play out and be wrong.
And yet, the National Security Section in EDVA,
which I believe is one of the most important in the country, had a job to do.
I had a unit to help supervise that had victims and had dangers to our community
that if we left, then more damage will be done.
EDVA is the Eastern District of Virginia.
Why is EDVA such a central part in the National Security Universe?
Because it has a history of being at the forefront of some of the top national security cases
and has continued to build on that history,
and that history originates from its location,
being near the Pentagon, near the intelligence community,
near the National Security apparatus, such that it is prime location
to investigate these kinds of cases.
So you're watching what's going on at justice, both in US Attorney's offices,
around the country, and at the FBI,
and main justice where people are being, I think, fired willy-nilly,
is the technical term.
Is this what you had been braced for or worse than you had expected?
What I braced for.
I mean, on day one, hundreds of people were pardoned,
including people who violently attacked police officers.
You have to know that something worse is going to happen if that's day one.
I think what I felt was pride at all the instances in which the institution was holding.
And so I think that educates a little bit on how I look back on it.
And what are you thinking of in that regard?
I mean, there are whole US Attorney's offices that are not contributing to certain cases.
There are factions that are walking out instead of engaging in certain conduct.
That is signs of life that the institution is holding,
that the careers know what matters in the department.
They were finding their red lines and you were sticking it out until your red line
kind of slapped you in the face.
But it was like watching a wildfire when you're in a neighborhood
and you see the flames kind of engulfed certain homes around you
and you know an ember may land on your house.
And at some point it landed on ours.
Well, I want to get to that.
But before if I ember landed on your house,
it landed on your sister-in-law's house in the Southern District of New York.
Maureen Comey was an extremely well-regarded federal prosecutor
at the US Attorney's Office in Manhattan.
And she was fired in, I believe it was July of 2025,
with no explanation.
But the explanation that I got in the reporting that I did on this
was that her last name was Comey.
That must have been a pretty shattering moment for your family.
It was for a family that can handle it.
She was and is, frankly, one of the best prosecutors in the country,
although I tease her that the Southern District of New York
has a rival in the Eastern District of Virginia.
And I am very proud that she is engaged in the litigation she is engaged in
by assuming the administration for doing what was unlawful and terminating her.
She is one of the relatively few people I think who has filed suit
over her improper dismissal.
That's right, and it's so important that she's doing that
because it allows the process to work out
where we will establish precedent that this is not okay.
And it will pave the road for others to travel to show that this is not okay.
And are you worried by the way when your sister-in-law is fired
that maybe these people are smart enough to figure out
that there is another Comey in the building?
Yes, of course, that crossed my mind.
And in large part, it was because if it happened unexpectedly,
it may damage our cases that I'm on or damage national security,
not because I'm special, but because I may be involved in a case
that it'd be hard to pass on if I lose my clearance immediately.
And so, of course, that was a concern.
So, and as that is going on, the president is invading
against James Comey.
He's issuing edicts on truth social that I guess
are supposed to be private to Pam Bondy,
but he publishes them for the world to see,
to say that he wants to see Comey indicted,
that he wants to see Leticia James,
the New York Attorney General indicted for mortgage fraud,
Eric Seabird, the US Attorney,
with experience as a career prosecutor,
it's been reported, says I cannot find the case here.
He either leaves or is fired by the president,
depending on which rendition of the facts that you believe,
but it doesn't really matter because he's gone,
he is replaced by insurance lawyer Lindsey Hall again,
not a career prosecutor.
You actually, I think, went to court
to see the indictment returned.
That's right.
Would just describe that moment.
There was a bit of an out-of-body experience for me.
I remember wondering what was going to happen.
I had no role in it.
And so, I was in the public part of the courtroom
to wait and see if the grand jury would return an indictment.
And when they did, and they announced...
This is kind of late in the evening.
Yes, that's right.
That's six or seven in the evening.
And I remember, you know,
leadership walks in,
and the grand jury walks in,
the four person,
and the magistrate judge holds the hearing
and when they announced James Comey's name,
it was my line.
And there was no calculating,
no thinking, how to do it.
It was, get back to my office,
pack up, and leave.
You literally went back to your office that night.
That's right.
And packed your things.
That's right.
And you wrote a very brief resignation letter.
What did it say?
That I resigned effective immediately
to uphold my oath to the Constitution and country.
And it was upholding your oath
because it's just a lab...
Now that you're able to elaborate, elaborate on that.
Yeah, I find it incumbent upon all of us
who take that oath to use it as a touchstone
for everything we do.
Every case, every investigation
is upholding this oath.
If I stayed in my view,
it would not be upholding my oath
because I would not be standing up for fact and law,
which is what I did for almost 10 years in the courtroom.
And so to uphold it, I needed to leave.
I'm doing it through the lens of trying to stand up for my oath
and call out what's happening to our institution
and our Constitution.
And so I felt like the first step
in doing that was leaving when that happened.
And why is that?
Because honestly, I'm just going to give you
a little bit of a hard time here.
You've looked at other situations
where the Department of Justice
has interfered in cases,
ordered cases dropped, for example,
in terms of the prosecution of Mayor Eric Adams in New York
over the objections of serious experienced prosecutors.
Is this one a red line because
of your personal connection
and you know the charges not to be fair?
Or is it a red line because
it's simply your professional judgment
that this indictment does not pass muster?
Both.
It's hard to disentangle the deep love I have for my family
and the deep love that I have for this institution.
And so engaging in a hypothetical where I find
which strand was worse or animating my decision more
is difficult.
But it was a combination of knowing close-up
what was happening here was wrong
because of my relationship to my family.
But also knowing that the President had just called
for the prosecution of his perceived enemies
and now it's my office that's involved in doing it.
And the role that I had as a supervisor
played a big role, a big part of why I left
because I started realizing that if I come back the next day
then it is somehow some silent ascent to my unit
that this was okay.
Even though you are in the national security space,
this was in a different space.
I suppose you could have sliced the salami
in a different way though it's getting pretty thin
at that point.
And everyone has again their own red lines
and we need good people in there to do the work they do.
I could not look at my unit in the face
and say that this was okay
and that we continue to put our heads down.
But I wanted them to stay.
And so I thought by leaving it in part
shows them that this is not okay
and gives them a voice that they can't have as the line
and allows them to continue doing the good work they're doing.
I'm a little bit confused by that.
You decide that it's incumbent on you to leave.
The indictment of James Comey
for allegedly making false statements
is one of the flimsiest
and most legally deficient documents that I've ever seen.
I could not figure out looking at this
what his alleged false statement was.
In fact, it was completely incoherent.
But you're saying that you can't tolerate that
as a manager,
but that the foot soldiers
who just keep on going?
Why?
Because the country relies on them.
It's incumbent upon people in the managerial space
or in the supervisory roles
to take those hits and leave.
If everyone left, it would be much worse.
And so in any way,
I could play a role in making sure the line was able to do its work.
That was part of my decision making.
But I don't mean to sit here and say that it was not in some way
my connection to my family.
I think it just means that relationship hit me harder
because I knew the department was after an innocent man.
I can't stand for that.
When you walked into the courtroom that evening
and heard James Comey being the subject of an indictment,
had you known in your guy that that was the end for you?
Had you already made that decision?
I knew.
It's so complicated to disentangle,
but the department had just indicted an innocent man.
And I was very close to that innocent man.
I had met him when I was 17 years old.
And since then, I had grown up going to him
for help on everything,
life, leadership, the department.
And so not knowing anything about the facts
I wasn't involved in the investigation,
any of that, just knowing who he was
and knowing what the department had just done,
both professionally and personally,
was not something I could stand for.
And did you ask his guidance on your decision to leave?
I did not want to talk to him in the lead up to this decision
for a lot of reasons.
And so by that point,
having known him for so long,
I knew what he would say.
That I needed to make sure that I was brave enough
to stand up on principle,
regardless of the consequences.
What was it like for you walking out of there
at what I guess you knew would be the last time?
It was like losing a segment of your heart.
And that's not so corny to say it out loud,
but that's just how it felt.
I really drank the Kool-Aid.
I care about the Department of Justice.
I care about its role in American life.
And I was so happy to be a part of that.
Every day we got to just stand up and do the right thing.
That was awesome.
And stepping away from that,
it had ingrained itself in part of my DNA.
I think it does for everyone who's there.
And every single person who has left
whether forced or not has felt that pain.
And it was hard.
And how did you explain this to your sons?
Yeah, that was hard.
I just feel a little emotional
because as part of doing this,
I was trying to represent what I would want them to do.
And that's the most important job I have.
It sounds so corny, but it means a lot to me.
It's making sure my three boys become men
in this world who are good contributors to society.
They are how old now?
Six, four and two.
And so I've tried to talk to them about that in age-appropriate ways.
And my six-year-old clicked pretty quickly.
When I needed to explain to them what it means to resign.
Because I didn't want to use the word quit.
We've instilled in them that we don't quit.
That we try hard things until their completion.
I tried to explain to them what it means to step away
from something if it's wrong.
And my oldest looked at me and said,
I think I get it.
He said, President Trump fired pop.
I said, yes.
He said, you fired yourself.
And I said, yeah, you get it.
You get it.
The lawyer Troy Edwards,
speaking with the New Yorker's Ruth Marcus,
more in a moment.
The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Lisa.
I never paid much attention to my old mattress.
I'd had it for years and it was good enough.
But when it came time to replace it, I had to ask myself,
is good enough really good enough?
It was time for a serious upgrade.
And my new Lisa Superior Hybrid is a sleep game changer.
Now I truly look forward to going to bed.
I sleep like a champ and I wake up feeling so much better than good enough.
Lisa's beautifully meticulously crafted mattresses are designed
and assembled in the USA.
Each one delivers exceptional comfort for every type of sleeper.
No matter how you like to sleep,
Lisa has the perfect mattress for you.
Another thing I love?
Lisa's committed to more than just a good night's rest.
They're committed to impact.
They work with local nonprofits across the US
to donate thousands of mattresses each year to families in need
with over 43,000 mattresses donated to date.
Go to Lisa.com for 20% plus get an extra $50 off
with promo code New Yorker, exclusive for my listeners.
That's lesa.com promo code New Yorker for 20% plus an extra $50 off.
Support our show and let them know we sent you after checkout.
Lisa.com promo code New Yorker.
The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported by Gusto.
As a small business owner, do you ever find yourself drowning in Admin?
If you are spending more time figuring out payroll or navigating human resources
than actually doing the business you love,
you need more than help.
You need Gusto.
Gusto is online payroll and benefits software built for small businesses.
It's all in one, remote friendly and incredibly easy to use.
So you can pay, hire, onboard, and support your team from anywhere.
It's so quick and easy to switch to Gusto.
Just transfer your existing data to get up and running fast.
You'll get automatic payroll tax filing, simple direct deposits,
health benefits, workers comp, 401k.
You name it, Gusto has options for nearly every budget.
And you won't pay a cent until you run your first payroll.
Let's face it, you didn't start your business
because you love paperwork and neither did I.
Gusto gave me back the time I was wasting on Admin
and let me get back to what I'm passionate about.
Try Gusto today at Gusto.com slash New Yorker
and get three months free when you run your first payroll.
That's three months of free payroll at Gusto.com slash New Yorker.
One more time, Gusto.com slash New Yorker.
The New Yorker radio hour is supported by Viking,
committed to exploring the world in comfort,
offering destination focused small ship experiences
on all seven continents with a short excursion included
in every port and programs designed for cultural enrichment.
And every Viking voyage is all inclusive
with no children and no casinos.
Learn more at Viking.com.
That's pure automotive joy.
I'm Peter, the owner of Muscle Car Junior.
It started as a hobby, then I started posting about it.
Before I knew it, I built the business for storing
muscle cars on Facebook Marketplace
and the community of car lovers on Instagram.
Today, new customers send me what's that message is from all over.
Not bad for a hobby.
Learn how meta helps over 35 million American businesses,
like Peter's Grow at meta.com slash community.
When you look at the outcome here,
which at least so far, justice has been done,
the indictment was dismissed not for the reason
that it was so factually and legally inadequate,
though that might have happened also,
but for the reason that Lindsey Hall,
again, the replacement,
U.S. Attorney was not appropriately appointed.
Is there any time that you think in the middle of the night,
maybe I could have stuck it out?
One time.
And it was in the starting weekend of Operation Epic Fury.
And when that started,
I sat for about an hour or two and asked my wife,
who I go to and everything.
Do I set all this aside and try and go back to help?
Because I was deeply worried about the lack of preparedness
of our national security apparatus,
given what has happened,
about what could happen if Iran attempted to retaliate,
and again, not because I'm some special expert in the field,
but because I'm hands and feet and can run and investigate
and prosecute cases and keep our community safe.
I wondered if I should try,
not that they'd ever have me back,
but that's the one time I've thought about it.
So how worried are you?
I'm concerned,
and I qualify it because they are amazing men and women
who are still in doing this work every day,
which was what I mean earlier when I said,
I hope they stay and do this work,
because they need them.
I'm worried because they shoulder additional responsibility
at preserving American security
with fewer people around them, fewer resources,
and an administration that's distracting them.
And that's not setting them up for success,
and so I'm worried for them and for our national security.
I'm going to say something you're going to make fun of.
My friends certainly do.
Every 4th of July, my family reads the Declaration of Independence,
and it is in part I'm convinced my in-laws attempt to haze
the newbies by giving them sections
that have really hard words to pronounce,
which I think I failed that a number of times.
But it's in part to instill in us a memory of where we've come from
and where we need to go.
And it touches on this concept,
the rebuild of the Justice Department,
because if you look back on the long train of abuses
and usurpations that Jefferson and others wrote about,
included in that was the king's constant abuse of the judiciary,
and the abuse of taking soldiers,
the British soldiers, who had been accused of crimes
and returning them to Britain for punishment,
which meant leniency.
That's embedded in our founding,
that there was abuse of the criminal justice system,
and we stood up to it.
Is anybody turned around and returned?
That you know of?
No.
I know plenty of folks who plan to.
When things change.
God willing.
There are a number of folks who are at the ready to go back and do the mission
and do it as a career.
And would you be among them?
I'd try to be first in line.
Troy, it's really been a pleasure to talk to you.
Thank you so much for having me.
Troy Edwards was a federal prosecutor,
and he resigned from the Department of Justice last fall.
Ruth Marcus writes for The New Yorker on the Supreme Court
in the Justice Department,
and you can find her work at NewYorker.com.
I'm David Remnick, and that's our program for today.
Thanks for listening. See you next time.
The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co-production of WNYC Studios
and The New Yorker.
Our theme music was composed and performed
by Merrill Garbus of Tune Arts,
with additional music by Louis Mitchell.
This episode was produced by Max Bolton,
Adam Howard, David Krasnell, Jeffrey Masters,
Louis Mitchell, Jared Paul, and Ursula Summer,
with guidance from Emily Boateen,
and assistance from Michael May, David Gabel,
Alex Barish, Victor Guan, and Alejandra Deckett.
And we had additional help from Bill Pollock.
The New Yorker Radio Hour is supported in part
by the Cherina Endowment Fund.
WNYC Studios is supported by Odoo.
When you buy business software from lots of vendors,
the cost's at up and it gets complicated and confusing.
Odoo solves this.
It's a single company that sells a suite of enterprise apps
that handles everything from accounting to inventory to sales.
Odoo is all connected on a single platform
in a simple and affordable way.
You can save money without missing out on the features you need.
Check out Odoo at ODOO.com.
That's ODOO.com.
Hi, I'm Nicole Feltz, the global fashion news
and features director and co-host of Vogue's podcast,
The Run Through.
Each week on the show, our listeners get an all-access pass
to the world of Vogue with the latest fashion news
and the most exciting voices in the industry.
On Tuesdays, join me to hear interviews
with influential leaders in the industry
like Calvin Klein, Daniel Roseberry, and Jonathan Anderson.
On Thursdays, join Head of Editorial Content at Vogue,
Chloe Mao, and Head of Editorial Content at British Vogue,
Chomanati, as they explore style and culture
through the lens of fashion with guests
like Martha Stewart, Kamala Harris, and Tracy Ellis Ross.
The Run Through with Vogue, new episodes,
every Tuesday and Thursday, wherever you get your podcasts.
The New Yorker Radio Hour



