“A message from Central Command”

Hi, again, everyone. It's now 5 o'clock, New York. There's a lot going on this hour. We'll

have all of it for you. We'll get through all of it together as we've been reporting.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Nome has been fired by Donald Trump. Republican Senator

Mark Way-Millen of Oklahoma is expected to replace her. Right now, we are moments away from

the start of a briefing at St. Com where military officials, including the Secretary of Defense,

Hexeth, are expected to update the country on the war in Iran. So far, we have received no

concrete answers on the timeline of the war, the military objectives, the policy objectives,

how exactly and why exactly it started or whether or not there will be American troops on the ground

in Iran. There is almost every indication that this could be. It is shaping up to be the kind of

forever war Donald Trump literally built a political career around opposing and promising never

to start. But now with Iran, he has changed his tune. Watch.

So we're going to end these endless wars. Endless wars. They never stop. You haven't seen these

wars that go on for 14 years, 20 years. We're doing very well on the war front to put it mildly,

I would say. Somebody said on the scale of 10, where would you rate it? I said about a 15.

We had no wars. They said he will start a war. I'm not going to start a war. I'm going to stop

wars. We're already substantially ahead of our time projections, but whatever the time is, it's

okay, whatever it takes, we will always and we have right from the beginning, we projected four to

five weeks. But we have capability to go far longer than that. We'll do it.

From no wars to however long it takes, now with the war and Iran intensifying on multiple fronts

and already costing the United States $1 billion a day in the last six lives of men and women

of the military, it appears that it will take a whole lot of US military force and possibly treasure

and spending. The White House Press Secretary claimed me in the statement to Axios that Donald Trump

makes decisions based on what's in the best interest of the United States and the American people

end quote. But here's what the American people think about Donald Trump's war in Iran.

Six and ten of them disapprove of the decision to take military action in Iran, 41% of Americans

approve. Six and ten also say they do not think Donald Trump has a clear plan for handling the

situation. Donald Trump's lack of a plan might be one of the reasons as to why he has not yet

sought approval from Congress as prescribed in the Constitution to launch a war against the foreign

country and its leader. The New York Times reports today how presidents for decades have side-step

Congress to launch military strikes, but that Donald Trump's lateral decision to attack Iran

is an extraordinary escalation because quote, the prospect of attacking Iran absent a literally

imminent threat of attack by the country has stood apart as a textbook example of what would

seemingly still require congressional authorization. The potential for rapid spiraling of retaliatory

strikes on U.S. citizens, troops, and allies in neighboring countries have escalation into a bloody

regional conflagration with global economic consequences seem too extreme a risk for any one person

to decide to take, to take on. As we wait for the briefing at St Com to begin, I want to bring in

our panel, Lieutenant General Mark Hurtling. He served as a commanding general, the U.S. Army in

Europe, also joining us staff writer at the Atlantic video podcast host David Fromis here,

also joining us, puck new senior political columnist, national affairs analyst John Halmins back,

and senior political analyst contributing host on pod save America, host of the podcast runaway

country Alex Wagner is here. General Hurtling, let me start with you. What would you like to hear

today and what happens you heard yet on what is I guess day five or day six of this war with Iran?

Well, what I would like to hear today, Nicole, is what are the objectives? What are the strategic

end states? What's the vision for this conflict? And number two, as you were just talking,

a mind meld came into me thinking back to FDR during World War II and the grainy films that all of us

saw in our history classes where he went before Congress and talked about a day that will live in

infamy and gaining the support of the American people if he's looking to conduct a war.

As you just showed on the statements there, the majority of the American people, me included,

don't believe in this conflict because we don't know what it's all about, we don't know the

strategic objectives. So in order to go to war as a nation, the leader of the nation usually has to

persuade and influence the American people to understand the reasons for that war. We still don't

know other than the fact that they wanted to decapitate a regime and go along with our partners

in Israel to make their lives safer. So that's what I'd like to hear truthfully.

General Hurtling, I just want to keep an eye on this and take it as soon as it starts if I

interrupt you, I apologize in advance. What is the impact to the military of the, I think last time

we talked there were four Russianels, Marco Rubio, so we followed Israel. We knew they were going to

strike, so we had to engage Donald Trump about a month ago, talked about the people protesting on

the streets. Yesterday he added what we count as the fourth or fifth rationale, and that was that

they tried to kill him after the strike against General Salmani. We also have from Rubio and

other members of the cabinet other utterances about Iran, but not one clear reason why we are at war

with Iran. What is the impact on the military of having that not either agreed to among the

different members of the cabinet, including the president or communicated directly with the country?

When you are an operational level commander, Nicole, and what I mean by that is someone who

pulls forces together and develops a plan, they take a look at, first, what are the strategic

objectives? What do my political and civilian leaders want me to do? Again, I'm going to

harken back to World War II. I study this in history classes, but when Marshall gave Eisenhower

the command to go into Europe, he said, enter the continent of Europe and defeat the Nazi war

machine. That was directly from the president, and the president knew what the strategy was going

to be next. So the operational commander knew what he had. I'm honored to stand here.

General Hartley, we're going to listen in. This is Defense Secretary Pete Hexeth at the podium

alongside St. Com Commander Admiral Bragg Cooper. We'll listen in.

Better part of two hours. Going through the entirety of this operation, Operation Epic Fury,

and Admiral, I want to thank you for everything you do in your incredible leadership,

for your dynamic thinking, the way you're attacking this problem set, on every level.

In just days of Operation Epic Fury, you and your team have delivered nothing short of devastating,

precise strikes, taking out the better part of Iran's navy, making it combat ineffective,

neutralizing missile sites and launchers, and establishing total dominance over the skies,

we fly over and seize, we fly over. Our forces are executing with unmatched skill,

and the mission is advancing decisively. This is the kind of no nonsense, results driven,

war fighting that America demands, and you're delivering it in spades. You are the man for this moment.

Admiral Cooper, on behalf of the president, the Department of War and every American watching

on, thank you for your outstanding job you and St. Com are doing. Keep pressing the fight,

and we are with you all the way. A few thoughts before I hand it over to the Admiral for an update.

Iran is hoping that we cannot sustain this, which is a really bad miscalculation

for the IRGC and Iran. You see, there's no shortage of American will here. We remember and

honor our fallen, those six that we will soon welcome at Dover who gave everything for their

country in this mission. We remember them, but we remember them by rededicating ourselves even

more fervently to this mission. Our commitment to our mission objectives only increases as our

advantages continue to increase. We've got no shortage of munitions. Our stockpiles of defensive

and offensive weapons allow us to sustain this campaign as long as we need to. Again, our munition

status only increases as our advantage increases. Our capabilities, we have only just begun to fight

and fight decisively, having a chance to hear from Admiral Cooper. If you think you've seen

something, just wait. The amount of combat power that's still flowing, that's still coming,

that we'll be able to project over Iran is a multiples of what it currently is right now when

you add up our capabilities and those of the Israeli Defense Forces. And we have no shortage of

authorities. The Admiral knows we have clear objectives with maximum authorities on the battlefield.

The dumb, politically correct wars at the past were the opposite of what we're doing here. They had

vague objectives with restrictive, minimalist rules of engagement. No more. Our authorities,

his authorities, sent comms, authorities through the President and myself are maxed out.

Our capabilities are overwhelming and gathering still as are those of our Israeli partners.

Our munitions are full up and our will is iron clad, which means our timeline

is ours and ours alone to control. As long as it takes to ensure the United States of America

achieves these objectives, and as we flow more forces, and as we flow more capabilities,

and as our munitions, as we're flying over the top, have even more devastating effects,

we set the tempo, we set the timeline led by the commander on the ground. Our ear is to the ground

to listen to Admiral Cooper what he needs and what he needs he will get.

We are built for this fight, and we are in it to win it, and we have the right commander in the

lead. So I'll now hand it over to Admiral Brad Cooper to give you an update right here from St.

Count. Admiral. Mr. Secretary, first thank you very much and good afternoon and welcome to US

Central Command Headquarters. America's war fighting headquarters. It's great to be here alongside

the Secretary and representing the more than 50,000 men and women in uniform currently executing

Operation Epic Fury. So Mr. Secretary, first thank you very much for your leadership and support

and the very clear vision and objectives that you've given us to allow us to use overwhelming force

against the Iranian terrorist regime. And thanks to all of you for attending today and welcome to Tampa.

We are now starting our sixth day of a historic mission to eliminate Iran's ability to threaten

Americans. We are, if I could channel my inner Navy officer, we are at full speed ahead in execute

new orders given by leadership in Washington. The President and Secretary Hickseth have been crystal

clear in their expectations, and we are at a high level of execution as described by the Secretary

and earlier this week by me, US combat power is building as Iranian combat power declines.

Our air dominance allows us to hit Iran's center of gravity with overwhelming power and reach.

A couple of examples. In just the last 72 hours, America's bomber force has struck nearly 200

targets deep inside of Iran, including around to Iran. And in just the last hour, US B2 bombers

dropped dozens of 2,000 pound penetrator bombs targeting deeply buried ballistic missile launchers.

Notably, we've also struck Iran's equivalent of space command, which upgrades their ability

to threaten Americans. Then if I just look back over the last 24 hours of the operation compared

to where we were at start, ballistic missile attacks have decreased by 90% since day one.

drone attacks have decreased by 83% since day one. Having said this, we remained vigilant.

Our strikes against the Iranian Navy have intensified. You may have heard the President say

just a little while ago that we have sunk or destroyed 24 ships. That was true at the moment.

We're now up over 30 ships. And in just the last few hours, we hit an Iranian drone carrier ship.

Roughly the size of a World War II aircraft carrier. And as we speak, it's on fire.

The President gave us another task to raise or level Iran's ballistic missile industrial base.

So we're not just hitting what they have. We're destroying their ability to rebuild.

And so as we transition to the next phase of this operation, we will systemically dismantle Iran's

missile production capability for the future. And that's absolutely in progress.

This is going to take some time, but our forces are well supplied. As the Secretary said,

and we are absolutely ready to prosecute this mission decisively. Our combined joint forces have

relentlessly destroyed Iran's air defenses over the past few days. And they continue hunting

for more systems to kill. Our air defenders are operating at the very top of their game. I couldn't

be prouder shoulder to shoulder with our partners in the region in many cases, providing the most

integrated air defense network in Middle East history. We are fighting to win.

Through combined U.S. and Israeli combat power, we will continue decimating Iran's ability to

project power outside its borders. And if I can just conclude by saying a strong salute to the

brave men and women who are out on the point of edge of this really doing exceptional work, I just

couldn't be prouder and I know the American people sharing that same pride. So thank you very much.

Absolutely. And with that, we'll take a few questions. Yeah, right here.

Go ahead. We're very familiar with Iranian's capabilities. And as you might imagine,

we plan for it right from the outset. And I feel good about what the plan was. Like any good

organization, we adjust as necessary to meet the environment and we've made those appropriate

adjustments. Absolutely. Right here.

One, what's the American pilot shop down today? And two, a third report said there's an

extraordinary recording. It's on. I'm also my report said there's not a lot of bombing there.

Is that on purpose? Do we believe there's any registering there? And would we ever send special

forces to secure it? As Centcom pointed out, that those reports of an F-15 being shot down

are false. As you can imagine, Iran is doing everything it can to pedal in lies, deception,

and inflation of numbers in reality, mostly to propaganda is to their own people, right? They

have shut down the internet. They're hoping they can convince their own population that they're

having success. One thing one of their leaders said recently is that 500 Americans have been killed.

They claim. These are lies. The lies will continue. Centcom will continue to debunk those lies.

So and as often as the case in conflict, first reports are often wrong. As it pertains to nuclear

material and things like that, one of the objectives the president has always said is that Iran will

not have nuclear bomb nuclear capabilities, but we would never disclose what we will or will not

do inside operational plans. So Admiral Cooper's got a plan. We're working that plan and and

targets will be struck or not struck according to what we want to achieve. Yep, right there.

Sir Terry, so the president said earlier today in an interview that he would like to have say

and who's the next leader of Iran. Is this an expansion of your military objectives?

You knew that way. And additionally, you spoke earlier today about how previous leaders of

run resources from our industry are the millies. How do you avoid that?

Well, there's no expansion. Ultimately, I think the president's having a heck of a say

in who runs Iran given the ongoing operation we have. So there's no expansion in our objectives.

We know exactly what we're trying to achieve. I think today's a great example of what this war

department is capable of doing. I was just another part of Florida today, where we announced,

America's counter-Cartel conference. 18 countries coming together from Central South

America and the Caribbean coming together to fight cartels. That is something that is ongoing.

We're focused there. We're focusing the Indo-Pacific. We can mask combat power. In SETCOM,

UCOM is able to support that as well. So we know we're laser focused on our hemisphere and our

homeland. That's why we lock down the border. That's why we're working with partners to take

on cartels. That's why we're sinking drug boats. That's why we're on the offense there. But the

beautiful things about combat and commands is that, you know, Brad Cooper's laser focused on

central command, just like Frank Donovan is laser focused on southern command. We can do both.

That's what a global power can do. Ultimately, this issue of Iran's nuclear pursuit and their

unwillingness through negotiations to stop it was something President Trump has said for a long

time needs to be dealt with. After 47 years, he's doing something that no other president was willing

to do. We're doing it overwhelmingly and we're doing it decisively while also on other parts of

the globe having the desired effects. We take, for example, what we displayed yesterday,

the Iranian ship in the Indian Ocean, sunk by Indo-Pacific. Another combat and command

who coordinated with us in order to make that happen. America's reaches global. Our focus here,

though, those missions, these missions are narrow, they're scoped, and Admiral Cooper is well

on his way to ensuring that we reach those objectives. Right here, yes, sir.

We know how our own hope acknowledges the truth, Bill.

Do the Koreans are talking about providing

more cost-interference, given their experience? That's something that

having guys looking forward to, and from a paper, can you walk us through a little bit about the

how effective the Lucas-Grons have been, what kind of targets we've hit, and how much that's

helped, given their low cost alternative to the more expensive equipment. Go ahead.

I'm not familiar with the particular offer, but the interceptors in general. We've had a number

of new capabilities being filled. Obviously, I'm not going to talk about it from an operational

perspective of what those are, but I think you have seen over a period of time us kind of get on

the other side of this cost curve on drones in general. If I just walked back a couple of years,

you remember what you used to always hear? We're shooting down a $50,000 drone with a $2 million

missile. These days, we're spending a lot of time shooting down $100,000 drones with $10,000

weapons from ours. So that's one aspect. With Lucas indispensable, as many of you know, and if you

don't know, this was an original Iranian drone design. We captured it, pulled the guts out,

sent it back to America, put a little made America on it, brought it back here,

and we're shooting it at the Iranians. Good targets.

Good targets. Absolutely. Right there, yes. Thank you so much, Secretary.

President Trump and his first speech after the launch of the Operation Epic Theory,

he addressed Iranian people, and he said that there's going to be a time for you to come out,

but it's not now. Stay home. It's not safe. I'd like to know if there was a time when for that,

that you're going to urge Iranian people to come out, how that is going to play out,

and how are you going to protect the protesters? You know that they're going to be shot

probably, as being witnessed in January. That's what happened. How are you going to protect and

support the protesters? And, Admiral, I have a long question for you. How are you going to

minimize the civilian harms? We have a lot of evidence that the vaccine juniors,

IRGC commanders, they are now gathering in schools, in hospitals, in

few residential areas because their headquarters are bombarded, they are ruined, of course.

So how are you going to protect the civilians while you're attacking the IRGC people?

I would just say on the protests, obviously, the Iranian people showed a lot of courage

in those protests, and we saw that the Iranian regime was revealed for what it is in the way

they reacted to that, the world saw that. No one's done more than President Trump to reopen the

opportunity for those who want to free Iran to do so. Ultimately, it's common sense, as he set up

front, don't go out and protest while bombs are dropping inside Tehran and elsewhere.

So there will come a moment where he determines, or they determine that it's the time to seize

that advantage, but there's a lot of things we're doing and the Israeli military is doing,

targeting those individuals who are targeting those who protest. The more you do that,

and you erode their will and you erode their capabilities, the more you create an opportunity

for people to boldly stand up. Yeah, I would just reinforce the point we're targeting the people,

we're targeting the headquarters and the people who are targeting the protesters, first and

foremost. I'd also just double down on the President's comments that he previously made to the people

stay in your homes, keep things calm, stay out of the way. There's a lot of

U.S. and Israeli capacity coming over. We're hitting a lot of targets. The best thing for them to

do for right now is just to lay low. Right here. One common outcome of the American military

action in the past has been taking in thousands of refugees into the American homeland, and I'm

wondering if there's any safeguards put in place to make sure that the American people aren't

having to have another wave of refugees from the police or anyone else come and stay here.

I think it's safe to say there's no plan for a wave of new Middle Eastern refugees to the United

States of America. I think as the President has pointed out for a long time, there are a lot of

countries in this in the region who would be capable of providing that kind of support if need be,

but that's certainly not something we're planning on. Yep, back there, yeah.

Yes, sir, Michael in Washington Times, I wanted to ask, I know, you know,

separate gum because always of a truism in the military, did the British decision to refuse,

Diego Garcia had any impact on the mission itself? Did you have to adjust or were you able to just

completely go with the mission without even worrying about that? Well, as the President stated,

it was unfortunate that the Brits didn't from day one say, hey, go ahead and have access, but we

got there. We got there, and that's now part of the way that we're operationalizing bomber runs,

and as part of when we say more to come, it's more fighter squadrons, it's more capabilities,

it's more defensive capabilities, and it's more bomber pulses more frequently. The amount of

firepower over Iran and over Tehran is about to surge dramatically, and part of it is that we're

going to have even more basing, and it's not just the UK, we've had other friends step up,

and we're grateful for that. Maybe one more right here. Okay, the Azeri President earlier

today basically authorized his Minister of Defense to get in with airing troops for some type of

retaliatory action at the airport strain, as the Department of War has been sent home and working

on deep conflict with the Azeri, if they were to meet them, or if they have something in retaliation.

I'm sure there are plans all at the Admiral speak to that, but that does allow me to kind of

address this idea that the war might be expanding, or there's chaos, and nothing could be further

from the truth. If anything, what Iran is doing by targeting allied countries that would otherwise

want to stay out of this, they've actually pulled them into the American orbit. So now you've got

UAE and Qatar and Bahrain and Saudi and Kuwait and others saying, hey, we're with you.

Here's, we'll shoot with you, we'll fly with you, we'll defend with you, we'll allow you

more basing and other, a lot of which we can't talk about and won't talk about, but it's actually

firming up the unity of the resistance in order to focus exactly where we need to. So this idea

that it's expanding, or going, no, it's actually, it's actually simplifying in a number of ways,

exactly what we need to achieve and how we'll achieve it. I won't get out of policy in terms of

what we might do. What I will point out is, this is now the 12th country that Iran has attacked.

12 countries, and it goes right back to the Secretary's point. Those 12 countries are not too happy,

and I look forward to working with all the partners who are going to join us in this.

I would just close by saying, Mr. Secretary, one more question. What is your message to Americans

who are concerned about security here at home with the change-up that we're going to see at

carbon-accompanied security? Well, I think, I think, Chris, you know,

did an excellent job over there, securing our border and keeping us focused on threats and

the President making a change. We all serve at the pleasure of the President. I'm sure Mark

Wayne Mullin will do a fantastic job. He's been a friend of mine for a long time, but Chris,

he did a great job set himself for success. So I don't have any concerns about whether or not

the homeland will be covered down on. And I'll just end by saying, I wish every American could get

a chance to see what we see, a chance to go into the control room, into the tactical operation center,

go see these young men and women that are doing this, the dedication that they show at every level,

the way they've refined their craft. Now, I've talked to a young Colonel who's iterating on how we

target and how we find and fix different aspects of what the Iranians are trying to do. If they,

they don't know what they're up against. And if they think they've got it solved for

they're wrong. And ultimately, the combination of our ingenuity, the skill, the professionalism,

the discipline, and then the sheer weight of the capabilities of the US military, what you're

going to see may look routine. It might start to be like, oh, another boat, another launcher,

oh, another drone facility. What it takes to do this with the precision that we do is world class,

no one else can do it. And it's world class Americans. Like the ones I saw here, like the ones

that are coming home that we're going to greet home, that are the engine of what makes our country

great. And so I'm so grateful for folks like those here at St. Com, Central Command, who are

under your command. Thank you for your decisive leadership. And all I say to you is what I say to

them, keep going. Because the president and myself, we have your back. Thank you, everyone.

Sorry, shit. Thanks very much. Mr. Secretary, how's the operation going to ensure Iran never gets

stupid? What? We have been watching Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and the St. Com Commander

Brad Cooper, hold a briefing on the war in Iran, we're back with Lieutenant General Mark

Hurtling. David, from this year, Don Halmann, this year, Alex Wagner, this year, General Hurtling,

let me come back to you. The headline seems to be that we have barely started Pete Hegseth

saying over and over again, everything that you will see is intensifying from the bombing raids

to the targets, to the targeting. I heard one objective articulated by Amel Cooper and it was the

destruction of ballistic missile capabilities. 35 countries have ballistic missile capabilities,

so that was striking. But just in terms of how long you heard them discuss or what you heard

them discuss, how long does it take to carry out just what they publicly stated they have planned

as imminent? The targeting packages that Amel Cooper talked about is something that goes in,

it goes on in every headquarters, it's conducting conflict. They plan those through intelligence

assessments, they look at the targets, they look at the best weapons system to put on those targets,

and it was interesting to me, Nicole, that the secretary said at one point,

Amel Cooper has his operational plan, and he does, and he's executing it extremely well. He gave

a very succinct and good briefing, outlining the kinds of war fight they are conducting right now.

That's all good. There's no question of that. I have no question after serving four decades in

the military that they are executing this mission with a plum, that they're doing it extremely well,

and all the people that the secretary talked about in the headquarters that sent

common and the forward locations are executing what they have been training to do for years.

That is their mission. The one thing I didn't hear though, Nicole, and this is the important part,

what is the strategy? What is all this killing about? Is it just about destroying all of the missiles

and the weapon systems and the barriers, and the ballistic missiles, as you just said,

is it striking Iranian targets at every opportunity, like the both they sunk in the Indian ocean,

is it looking to shut the country down, and even though the population has been told to stay

indoors, which they probably haven't heard, because there's no TVs or radios working inside of Iran,

you still have to concern yourself with what happens next when the bombs start falling. You can

destroy every single target you go after. That does not win a war. There still is no indication

of what the strategy is. What should be the outcome? And hope, hoping that someone steps up,

or hoping that there's a leader that says, I'm now in charge of Iran after all this is over,

after you've been pounding it, so far for six days, the potential for up to eight weeks

is going to limit the amount of people that are going to want to step forward. The other thing

I mentioned, I actually saw a map, an unclassified version. I want to make sure you know that,

of the city of Tehran, and the amount of targets they have struck inside that city that has

millions of citizens, it could not have avoided collateral damage. It's just not possible.

They are striking all the right headquarters, the IRGC, the Basige, the police stations,

all the security forces, but there are people living in that city too. The last thing I'll say,

Nicole, I wrote down, at the beginning of the secretary's speech, he basically said,

the will of the American military is sky high, and that's true. He said something like that.

But then he claimed that the will of the American people and the will of the American government

are 100 percent behind them. I'm not sure that's true. We are behind the warriors. We are behind

what they are trying to do. But again, the American people's will is important. They haven't been

told what the objective is. The American government, if you're just talking about the executive branch,

it's obviously, it's obvious they're behind it. The Congress of the United States,

writ large, is not behind it. So, I would question the American will, and as we've talked before,

Clauswood said, you have to have a great military, you have to have the will of the citizenry behind

you, and you have to have the support of the United States government. Right now, we have one of three

of those. So, that doesn't lead to a good strategy execution. In fact, 60 percent of Americans

do not approve of going to war with Iran, and only 26 percent of Americans, according to a poll

from February of 2026, approve of the gentleman who uttered those words,

Pete Hegseth. Let me bring you in on this, John Hauman. He also said, Pete Hegseth, quote,

authorities are maxed out. Immunitions are full up. Let me read you this headline from the Wall

Straight Journal. When the U.S. military's top general laid out the risk to President Trump

of launching a major and extended attack on Iran, one of the issues he flagged was America's

stockpile of munitions. That is being put to the test as the U.S. racist to destroy Iran's

missile and drone force before it runs out of interceptors to fend off to Iran's retaliation

current informer officials and analysts say, what do you make of what we heard from Pete Hegseth

this afternoon? Well, Nicole, there are so many questions that are begged when used phrases

like maxed out. I've heard Pete Hegseth, I'm almost certain in the last few days, talking about

munitions and saying that we have an infinite capacity. I know the guy went to Princeton, but

apparently his grasp of vocabulary sometimes is a little lacking. We do not have infinite capacity

by definition. We have finite capacity. That doesn't mean we don't have enough capacity

to fight this war. It doesn't mean that we can't fight this war and still have enough munitions

to handle other security threats around the world, but the point that I'm trying to make is,

when you hear him say that, just as when we heard Marco Rubio talk about how the threat from Iran

was imminent, but it was off in the future somewhere. Again, these words don't mean what you think

they mean, sir, imminent and often the future are not the same thing. They're actually at odds,

those pieces of language. What it raises is a bunch of, it raises more question. These uses of

these words and the way they talk about this raises, raises more questions than they answer,

and they raise significant doubts, I think not just in my mind, but in a lot of minds about

how credible the people who are enunciating these statements, making these claims. I think you

would need to have a lot of follow-up and you would need to know a lot more about what is true

in these cases, to be able to really evaluate some of the things that Pete Hegseth is saying.

That was the main thing that struck me, is that there's just a massive credibility,

again, given the way this last week has gone and the absence of articulating anything like a clear

consistent, not internally contradictory, not incoherent, case for war, which is what going to

Congress would have been good for the administration if it had a real case to make, to be able to stand

up in front of the Congress to get the support of the Congress and then be compelled to make the public

argument for what we were doing here. That would have been if they had a credible case for this,

it would have been good for them to do that in terms of building public support. They have instead

not made that case publicly, and to the extent they talk about things in public, they say 35

different things and a lot of those things are literally at odds with each other in addition to

being kind of difficulty even really parsed what they mean. So we have here a familiar thing in

cases of war fighting, I would say, in many cases in America, we have a credibility gap.

And it's very hard to kind of peer to really size up what to say about Pete Hankseth.

You can have various tonal objections to a tonal objections to the way that he presents himself.

But the more fundamental thing is, can we believe the things that they're saying?

And on the basis of you, take the administration as a whole over the course of the last year,

and certainly if you take Donald Trump over the course of an entire political career,

the answer to that question, at least the default setting, should be no.

I want to bring Alex and David from into this conversation. I have to sneak in a quick break

before I do that. We'll be back on the other side of that. Also ahead for us, we'll get to the other

big political story of the day, the firing of Homeland Security Secretary Kristinaum, who got a

shout out from Pete Hankseth. I'll have to check to see if her approval rating is higher than his

disable 26% in the break to see what that shout out really means. Everyone sticks around,

doesn't my house continues after quick break. Don't go anywhere.

We're all back. David from Let me read from your terrifying piece. You write this in the Atlantic,

quote, the paradox of Trump's Iran attack. Some of his supporters are circulating a plan to

use emergency powers to seize presidential control. The 2026 congressional elections,

his party would likely lose badly if those elections were free and fair.

Now there's a genuine military emergency at hand of a kind that federal courts have historically

deferred to. It's frightening to imagine the sinister domestic use that Trump will make of these

powers, especially if Trump's war lasts long. Please say more.

All right. Well, the two stories of the day that you've highlighted is two stories that press

conference and the departure of Kristinaum are one story, because here's the thing to worry about.

Even if you're someone who's broadly sympathetic to the need to free Iran from the terrifying

regime that has ruled it for so long, there was a mass shooting in Austin a couple of weekends

ago. We now have an alleged shooter and the alleged shooter was taken. There's a photograph of him

in a church wearing the Iranian flag. Now I don't suppose for a minute that the alleged shooter in

Austin had anything to do with the Iranian government, but Iran is the world's largest state

sponsor of terror. The United States is now engaged in a global war with Iran. They have in the past

struck on the American homeland. They could do so again. And at this moment, what you really need

at the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Taking Care of the Homeland,

someone professional, honest, competent, but also dedicated to protecting the liberties of the

American people against false or fictitious threats. There's a real worry here. This is the thing

that worries me most about this war, that in trying to free Iran, a noble objective, if that's

the objective, the United States is at danger of risking freedoms at home because you have an

administration that is contemptuous of American freedoms, a Department of Homeland Security that is

run by people who have no business anywhere near the repressive apparatus of the American government.

And there is going to be justified fear of Iranian terrorism that can be used as a resource for

people who want to then take exaggerated fears of Iranian terrorism and use it as a weapon against

freedoms and against free elections in 2026. Alex, it is shaping up to be the nightmare scenario.

Yeah. Yeah. But I will say, Nicole, I mean, I'm old enough to remember in 2016 when Trump was the

person advocating fiercely and loudly and on the internet against foreign entanglements and

foreign intervention. And one of the things that proved so durable for Trump was his narrative

about the corruption of the elites and how they were content to spend money freely and have the

working class go to war and do the hard work of defending democracy. And now that entire prospect

has been inverted. Trump is spending a billion dollars already on this ill-conceived Iranian

Lark. I don't even know what to call it. We have no idea what the goal is. It's as I can understand,

it more an exercise an ego burnishing than anything else letting Trump pick the next successor,

regardless of whether the Iranian people actually want that or not. And in the meantime,

Pete Hegseth, who clearly spends his mornings putting molding paste in his hair and not actually,

I don't know, fighting on the front lines of Tehran, is out here at press conferences saying,

our will is iron clad and the timeline is our own. Well, that's easy to say if you don't have to

be one of the working class Americans sending your son or daughter to the meat grinder

in service of Donald Trump's ego. I mean, the expansion of blood and treasure is something Americans

are not on board with as it concerns foreign wars and it seems to be something Donald Trump has

totally forgotten and it absolutely plays into the narrative of the corruption of elites.

Here's Donald Trump building ballroom spending Americans tax payer money on a project completely

of his own confection while we just hemorrhage blood and treasure all over again.

I mean, David from to the to the point Stephen Alex are both making

Trump wins in 15. I mean, he really wins by the beginning of 16 because he is the one in a

sea of what was in normal times viewed as a as a rather healthy offerings, if you will.

Jeb Bush was running, Chris Christie was running, Marco Rubio was running, Lindsey Graham was running,

the I'm sure no one watching the show thinks any of them were good options, but my point is that

there were a lot of choices in 2016. The single reason Donald Trump wins is because it wasn't just

a country that had turned against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It was the Republican party.

Those views against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have not softened. They have hardened. They

have also launched the political identities and careers of JD Vance and Pete Hegg says.

Yeah, well, if you were full enough in 2016 to believe a word Donald Trump said,

that's a you problem. That's not a him problem. The one thing he's always been very upfront about

is that you cannot trust him. He would end his rallies by reading the snake parable.

You knew I was a snake when you took me in. Yeah, he told you so. So Donald Trump in his first

term, fought an extended war in Iraq and northern Syria, Iraq and Syria against ISIS. He inherited

that war from President Obama. Donald Trump continued it. He continued the war in Afghanistan,

which he did not stop. He dropped larger ordinance in Afghanistan than his predecessors had done.

You fought a undeclared war with Iran. He killed Kossum Salamani in 2020, the commander of the

Kud's terra force. Maybe a good move, by the way, but not, yeah, I think a definitely a good move,

but not the act of an isolationist. That was all blather. And if you were full enough to believe it,

jokes on you, he told you not to trust him. Now, here's the moment of reckoning that is coming

for everyone for the country. As has been said, this war is supposed to be costing a billion dollars

a day. There is money in the pipeline to pay for it. But sooner or later, regardless of whether

Donald Trump asked for Congress's permission in advance, he's going to have to come back to Congress

for a supplemental appropriation. And the question for everybody at that point will be, do you stop,

try to stop the war mid course, or do you, despite the way that it was launched without permission,

without an explanation, do you try to make the best of what's to come? Because that request is coming

probably in a few weeks for some big amount of money as a supplemental. And Congress,

there are, there, there is the Republicans are not united in favor of it. So the voting coalition

vote is supplemental. Maybe you can get it through the Senate with all Republican votes,

but in the House, he's going to need Democratic votes to pass the supplemental if it passes.

Lieutenant General Mark Hurtling, thank you for being here for the better part of the hour.

David, Alex and John stick around when we come back, the lying Christine Knome cross that

may have caused her her job and it apparently had nothing to do with calling two American citizens

killed by federal agents, domestic terrorists. We'll get back to Numbs firing after a quick break.

The President approved ahead of time, you spending $220 million running TV ads across the country

and which you are featured prominently. Yes, sir. We went through the legal processes. Did it

correct? The President worked with OMB? Yes. He did. I'm not saying you're not telling the truth.

It's just hard for me to believe. And the President has I do that he said, Mr. President,

here's some ads I've cut and I'm going to spend $220 million running them that he would have agreed

to that. She's of course in full glam on a horse, writing it around to chase after that exchange.

And DHS Secretary Christine Knome is out. She has been fired. She's on her way to or she is now the

former Secretary of DHS Donald Trump denied signing off on that extensive ad campaign and then a

short time ago he fired her. So it will be Republican Senator Mark Wayne Mullins job now pending

confirmation by the Senate to lead the Department of Homeland Security and agency squarely focused

on Donald Trump's very unpopular mass deportation agenda. We're back with David John and Alex.

Alex so much so much to Mull. Let's start with Christine Knome and then we'll do and we'll do

her replacement. Yeah. I mean on its face this appears to be a corruption issue because

Christine Knome funneled $220 million to the strategy group which is a group. The CEO of

the strategy group is married to her DHS spokesperson. The strategy group was instrumental in

Christine Knome's 2022 gubernatorial campaign. They cut ads for her again paid with state money

while she was governor in 2023. I mean the level of corruption here is quite obvious.

However, I think what it's really about is ego, right? There is only room for one big dog on

the main stage and that big dog is Donald Trump and you see John Kennedy the senator in that hearing

yesterday. I don't want to say masterfully because I'm not sure anything John Kennedy does is

masterful but basically using Trump as a cudgel and Trump's ego is a cudgel with which to beat

Christine Knome and saying the big dog never would have approved you taking out a multi-million dollar

ad campaign to burn her share on credentials. Would he? And she's put in the awkward position

of basically lying and saying, you know, no, he was okay with it. Trump is never okay with any of

his cabinet secretaries taking the limelight. And I wish it was a move driven by the fact that she

is completely corrupt. In addition to the strategy group, there are myriad other examples of this,

which we've talked about on this show Nicole including blankies that result in people getting fired

or blankies not being there was the resulting in people's. Not getting moved from one private jet

to the other. Exactly. Thank you for putting a finer point on it. Her boyfriend looking for

official DHS guns or boyfriend Corey Lewandowski not really legally being entitled to have the

job that he does at DHS. But I really genuinely think this is Trump doesn't like when other people

have the limelight when other people are making things inconvenient for him. And so in the way that

he does, he banished her to a job completely fabricated called the shield of the Americas,

which I guess is like an off-brand Marvel franchise. I don't even know what it is.

I'm surprised he didn't just make her deputy ambassador to Greece and send her along the way with

Kimberly Delgoyle. But inconvenient to be a woman like Christy Dome right now.

So how many you can either get a quick minute or I can tell everybody that we're not done. We are

all going to carry over the top of the hour. You pick.

I said to you, you're showing a call. All right, all right, so that's the okay, okay,

okay, I'm going to take it back then. It's my show and Ari Miller is supposed to be here

in four minutes. He isn't going to be here. So you're going to see all four of us for a little

bonus panel. We need to fit in a quick break and make a quick plan for what we're going to talk

about on the other side. It's going to be exciting. Don't go anywhere.

Hi, everyone. I'm still here. It's now six o'clock in New York. I don't usually get to say it's

six o'clock in New York. Normally, you'd be seeing my dear colleague and my friend Ari Melba right now.

He's a few minutes delayed. He's coming. Don't go anywhere. Be tuned in for him as I'm sure you all

did. He will be here in a minute. But we're going to get to a story that was buried in all the news

of the last 24 hours with Pete Hegseth and Admiral Cooper having their press conference on the war

in Iran and the breaking news about the firing of DHS Secretary Christina. It's a story that says

a whole lot today about the state of the rule of law in our country. New York Times is reporting

about the efforts the Department of Justice made to find something, anything, but something that

did not exist about former President Joe Biden to the point that they opened a criminal investigation

from that reporting quote the Justice Department after calls by Donald Trump to investigate Joe Biden

scrutinized whether Biden and his aides broke the law in using the auto pen to sign presidential

documents, but was ultimately unable to move forward with making a case according to three people

briefed on the matter. We want to bring in New York Times investigative reporter Mike Schmidt. He's

bilingual in that reporting. David Frum, John Halman, Alex Wagner are all doing overtime and they're

still with me. Mike, take me through what you and your colleagues are reporting on this.

Basically, this is the most recent failure by the Trump Justice Department to follow through on what

Trump wants. They were not able to build a criminal case against former President Biden and his

aides. To many legal folks, this was a pretty clear issue. There had been a Justice Department

office of legal counsel opinion that essentially allowed for this to happen. The President, as we all

know, has a lot of immunity in official acts. While Trump had pressured the Department to do this,

the Department was ultimately unable to essentially criminalize behavior that he did not like.

And this is part of a pattern that we see now where the President is unable to get the Justice

Department to bring the indictments that he wants or have those indictments stick. And he has

really set out to do retribution. It's not that retribution has not had damage to those that have

been criminally investigated and targeted by his department because there is a cost for these

individuals, even if they are not charged or the cases don't go forward. But at the end of the day,

Trump has not been able to jail his rivals in the way that he's wanted.

I mean, Mike, when you and your colleagues break these stories, it's this window into absolute

insanity inside the Department of Justice. And it sort of runs on a parallel track with the efforts

to indict six Democratic lawmakers who made a video telling men and women of the military not

to follow illegal orders. I don't know, half a dozen times to try to indict Tish James,

the efforts to or the successful opportunity to indict Jim Comey. Is this all that they're doing?

I mean, I think there's also activity in Florida to try to investigate former President Obama

and people around him. How much of the Department's resources are tied up in losing retribution

prosecutions? Look, we know that this is something that consumes the time of top prosecutors in many

different offices. And we know that this is a Justice Department that is also distracted by

other matters. SDNY, the prosecutor's office in Manhattan, has spent an enormous amount of time

on the Epstein documents. We know that the US Attorney's Office in Miami, as you were saying,

has been working on this conspiracy investigation that goes all the way back to the Biden,

the Obama years to see if there was this larger conspiracy that started with Russia that goes

all the way through the documents investigation of Trump. We know that the Department has been hollowed

out at the top, both the Justice Department at the prosecutor level, but also at the FBI,

where dozens and dozens of agents have been fired. And even more recently, those agents

that had been dismissed right after Cash Mattel most recently got into trouble. So,

this is a Justice Department, and we've written about this, but I'm not sure that it always comes

through as clearly sometimes as we're seeing it, that is thinned out, that is under enormous

amount of pressure. Agents and prosecutors don't want to touch anything that could blow up in

their faces. And because of that, there are people in the Department who are worried that the

country is in a weaker position to deal with major frauds or major national security threats to

the country because these offices are so knee deep in other things are distracted by other matters

or are hollowed out. I mean, John Heilman, it's one of the few effective mile markers for how we

have descended, how much worse off we are. In the past, even if you didn't like who won an election,

you didn't like who they picked to be the Attorney General, you had some ability to trust that

underneath that political post, and they're very few at the Department of Justice,

where people who have been prosecuting drug cartels or prosecuting cyber crimes or prosecuting

and investigating child sex traffickers for a long, long, long time for the entirety of their careers.

That's what they've ripped out, and it's like yanking all the cords out of the wall. There's nothing.

Nicole, I don't want to minimize the serious point you're making, but this morning at around 6.45

a.m., I walked into the green room and saw your husband, Mike there, and he was he was about to go

on morning, Joe, and he walked out there to go on the show. I was going to go out a little bit

after him, and I looked up and saw a chiron that said the Justice Department had realized it

couldn't make the case on the auto pen, and I was like, you know, we are, this is the most,

this is all the mandatious stuff that the DOJ has done. This is the thing that's just the stupidest.

I mean, it is literally of all of the stupid stuff, of all the petty, trivial, totally divorce

from any kind of legal logic or any kind of real consequence in the world that just complete

retribution is completely just, you know, blowing smoke or spreading around the firehose of crap

that they do. This is the one that has in some way set me off most because it's just a ludicrous

thing, this idea that somehow Joe Biden, the use of the auto pen would somehow be the basis for

legal case in the court of law in America. And I looked at that chiron and I thought, you know,

we talk about earth one and earth two on the show all the time. I'm like, we're on earth three,

and earth three turns out to be the stupidest of the earths. Like, if this is like now, we're doing

chiron's breaking news, the Justice Department can't prosecute Joe Biden for using an auto pen

that every single president in our lifetime, since they invented the auto pen, every president

is using the auto pen. I've never, even when I try to put myself in their heads, I can't quite

understand what even the most fantastical hallucinatory ridiculous basis, like if you were trying to

spin a rationale for why that would be illegal, I can't get there. I mean, there may be some place

to get that I could convince myself, but it would take some kind of drug that I have not yet discovered.

And I've tried hard to find drugs that are that strong. They're not out there. So I'm I'm I'm

piecing out on this story. I just can't believe we were spending any time talking about it

on the way up or on the way down. Um, David from our give me the last word, but I'm going to ask you

to build on Hyalman's take not mine. I mean, I spoke to someone who's who's otherwise pretty smart.

He's actually a very, very senior media executive over the summer. And he says something. I didn't even

know this. I mean, I actually do try to track the conspiracies on the right, especially after Elon

Musk's tweet about not dropping in the Epstein files. I was like, whoa, I'm missing a whole bunch

of stuff. And I, I'm now, I'm now pretty steeped in the pyramids conspiracies. I miss, I will confess

to missing the auto pen conspiracy theories. Um, but this was an otherwise rather intelligent person

who said, Oh, what do you think about the auto pen conspiracy? And I was like, what are you talking

about? Well, when you get the department of justice working on the auto pen conspiracy, you keep

them too busy to ask the question that I've been thinking about all day, which is the former and

now former secretary of Homeland Security steered $200 plus million to seemingly fake bogus companies

controlled by our friends to for work that didn't need to be done. One of the questions I would

think of our prosecutors, I wonder, did any of that money possibly make its way back to her?

That's a, that's, that's the question. Did she just send them a very, very nice, the contractors,

the bogus contractors, just send her a very nice thank you note, or do they express their gratitude

with flowers or maybe even something more? That's something you would want that that's just an

obvious line of inquiry. The department of justice will not be allowed and won't have time to look

into. Even if they wanted to, it's such a good point. Um, Mike Schmitt, it's a great piece of

reporting. I'm David from Don Halman in Alex Wagner. You've done the extraordinary. You've served

your time on my show. You've hung around for a little bit of an after party. We got to moonlight

in some of Ari's hour. I want to thank all of you. I want to thank our viewers for rolling with

all of us. So seamlessly, we're so grateful to all of you. Thank you for letting us into your homes

tonight. Thank you for letting us into your homes tonight.