April Lampros And Her Allegations Made Against Diddy (Part 3)

What's up everyone and welcome back to the program.

In this episode we're getting right back to April Lampros' complaint made against Diddy.

First cause of action, battery.

83.

Miss Lampros incorporates, by reference, all preceding paragraphs and re-elections them, as

if said fourth fully, herein, 84.

The defendant committed battery against Miss Lampros, when he penetrated Miss Lampros

orally and vaginally against her will, as detailed in the four encounters above, 85.

In addition, Mr. Combs physically assaulted Miss Lampros when he pulled her hair and

forced her to perform oral sex on him in an open parking garage with a parking attendant

watching.

86.

Defendant Combs intentionally and without her consent.

Attack Miss Lampros to satisfy his sexual desires.

After all circumstances, the defendant's physical contact with Miss Lampros was offensive

and wrongful.

Defendant Combs continued to attack Miss Lampros despite her attempts to thwart his actions.

87.

The defendant's conduct was, the direct and proximate cause of Miss Lampros passed in

future substantial damages, including significant pain in suffering, lasting psychological and

financial harm, loss of dignity, and invasion of privacy.

88.

The defendant's actions constitute sexual offenses as defined in Article 130 of the New York

Penal Law, including but not limited to sexual misconduct and forcible touching.

89.

The plaintiff's claim for battery is thus timely under the Gender Motivated Violence Act

NYC Admin Code, Section 10-1101.

The Second Cause of Action.

Assault, Sexual Assault, 90.

Miss Lampros incorporates, by reference, all preceding paragraphs and real edges them

as if set forth fully herein.

91.

As described above, Defendant Combs frightened and plays plaintiff in apprehension of harm

when he physically assaulted her within the city of New York.

92.

Defendant forcibly touched and attempted and or threatened to touch, plaintiff's intimate

areas, and or touch her with his intimate body parts.

93.

As a result of Defendant Combs Conduct, plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer harm,

including physical injury, severe emotional distress, humiliation, anxiety, and other consequential

damages for which he is entitled to an award of monetary damages and other relief.

94.

The Conduct of Defendant Combs described above was willful, wanton, and malicious.

At all relevant times, Defendant acted with conscious disregard for plaintiff's rights

and feelings, acted with the knowledge of or with reckless disregard for the fact that

his conduct was certain to cause injury and or humiliation to plaintiff, and intention

to cause fear, physical injury, and or pain and suffering to plaintiff.

By virtue of the foregoing, plaintiff is entitled to recover punitive damages.

95.

The Cause of Action is timely under the Gender Motivated Violence Act and Y.C.

Madman Code, Section 10-1101, Third Cause of Action, Negligine Infliction of Emotional

Distress.

96.

Miss Lampros, Incorporates by Reference, All Proceeding Paragraphs and Realleges them, as

if set forth fully herein.

97.

The Defendant's Conduct created an unreasonable risk of causing emotional distress to plaintiff,

and the defendant's new or should have known that such conduct was likely to result in

an emotional distress that might and or likely would cause illness or bodily harm, 98.

The plaintiff's emotional distress was foreseeable to the defendant's, 99.

As a direct and proximate result of the Negligine Conduct of the defendant's plaintiff suffered

and will continue to suffer severe emotional distress, 100.

Defendant's Conduct was Wanton, Militius, Willful, and or Cruel, entitling plaintiff to punitive

damages.

101.

This cause of action is timely under the Adult Survivors Act, NYCPLR, Section 214,

J. McKinney, 2022, because it arises out of conduct perpetrated against plaintiff, who

was the statutory age or older at the time of the conduct, which constitutes multiple sexual

offenses, as defined in Article 130 of the New York Penal Law.

The Fourth Cause of Action, Violation of the Victims of Gender Motivated Violence Protection

Law, NYC, Admin Code, Section 10-1101, VGM, VPL, 102.

Miss Lampros, Incorporates by Reference, All Proceeding Paragraphs, and Re-Elegism, as

have said Fourth, Fully, Herein, 103.

The above described conduct of defendant comms, including, but not limited to, comb sexual

assault of plaintiff in New York City, constitutes a crime of violence against plaintiff, and

is a crime of violence motivated by gender.

As defined in Section 10-1101, the term of violence means an act, or series of acts that

would constitute a misdemeanor, or felony against the person, as defined in state or federal

law, or that would constitute misdemeanor, or felony against property, as defined in state

or federal law.

If the conduct presents a serious risk of physical injury to another, whether or not those

acts have actually resulted in criminal charges, prosecution, or conviction, the term crime

of violence motivated by gender means a crime of violence committed because of gender,

or on the basis of gender, and due, at least in part, to an animus based on the victim's

gender.

104.

Defendant SME, and their subsidiary A&R, enabled Mr. Combs to commit the crime of violence

motivated by gender, and are therefore also liable under VGM VPL.

105.

As detailed above, Ms. Lamprost worked for Arista Records during Mr. Combs' assault.

Bad Boy Records was a subsidiary of Arista Records at the time.

Ms. Lamprost reported to her manager, Jeff, who was an agent of Arista Records.

106.

Defendants AR, and SME, enabled Mr. Combs' commission of the crimes of violence motivated

by gender, and thus are liable under the NYC victims of Gender Motivated Protection

Act.

107.

Defendants A&R, and SME, enabled or participated in the sexual abuse of plaintiff because defendants

fell to, among other things, protect plaintiff from a known danger, have sufficient policies

and procedures in place to prevent sexual assault, properly implement policies and procedures

to prevent sexual assault, take reasonable measures to ensure that policies to prevent sexual

assault were working, train their employees on identifying sexual assault, and inappropriate

workplace behaviors.

Defendant Arista Records enabled or participated in the sexual abuse of plaintiff because defendants

felt the timely and properly educate, train, supervise, and or monitor their agents or

employees regarding policies and procedures that should be followed when sexual abuse

is suspected or observed.

109.

Prior to Combs' actually assaulting plaintiff, Arista Records knew or should have known

that Combs was not fit to be in a position of authority.

Defendants buying through their agents, servants, and or employees became aware or should have

became aware of Combs' propensity to commit sexual assault and to the risk to plaintiff

safety.

At the very least, defendant knew or should have known that they did not have sufficient

information about whether or not their leaders, managers, and people were safe to be in positions

of power.

110.

Defendant Arista Records knew or should have known that Combs posed a risk of sexual assault.

Defendant Arista fell to properly supervise Combs and protect plaintiff from a known danger,

thereby enabling Combs repeated sexual assaults of plaintiff.

111.

Defendant Arista Records negligently deemed Mr. Combs was fit to be in a position of authority

and or that any previous suitability problems Mr. Combs had were fixed and cured and or

that Mr. Combs would not commit acts of sexual assault and or that Mr. Combs would not

injure others.

112.

Moreover, Defendant Arista Records enabled the sexual abuse of plaintiff by actively

maintaining and employing Mr. Combs in a position of power and authority through which

Mr. Combs had control over people, including plaintiff.

113.

As a direct and proximate result of the aforementioned crime of violence and gender-motivated violence,

plaintiff has sustained and will continue to sustain monetary damages, physical injury,

panic suffering, and serious psychological and emotional distress, entitling her to an

award of Compensatory and Punitive Damages, Injunctive and Declaratory Relief, Attorney's

Fees and Costs, and other remedies as this court may deem appropriate damages, as said

4th in Section 10-1104.

The above described conduct of Defendants constitutes a sexual offense, as defined an article 130

of the New York Penal Law.

115.

Pursuant to Section 10-1105A.

This cause of action is timely because it's commenced within two years and six months

after September 1st, 2022.

The Prayer for Relief.

Wherefore, plaintiff prays that the court enter judgment, inner favor, against defendants,

banning the following relief, A, for a money judgment, representing Compensatory Damages,

including consequential damages, loss wages, earnings, and all other sums of money together

with interest on these amounts according to proof, B, for a money judgment for mental

pain and anguish and severe emotional distress according to proof, C, for a punitive and

exemplary damages according to proof, D, for Attorney Fees and Costs, E, for the pre-judgment

and post-judgment interest, and death, such other and further relief as the court may

deem just improper.

Jerry Demand.

Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by Jerry on all issues of fact and damages stated herein.

This was dated on May 23rd, 2024, and it was signed by Tyrone Blackburn.

Alright, that's going to do it for the April Lamprose complaint.

And I have a sneaking suspicion, folks, this is not the last one we're going to see.

All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.