Best of the Program | Guest: Stanley Woodward Jr. | 9/4/26

0:00On today's program, how to spot a Canadian. A Canadian, a very helpful guide from the Glendek program. Also, Bernie and AGI, there's a big announcement, might be true, might not be true, but what Bernie did yesterday is so dangerous on AGI. And Stanley Woodward, Jr., he is with the DOJ and they're now looking into beef prices even deeper. Call that and more on today's podcast. Truth is under attack in our culture. People are embracing lies about gender. They're rejecting the sanctity of every human life and the government is even put punishing people for saying what's true and right, or worse, the woke mob is doxing them and slandering them with no due process. Just an angry mob making their lives miserable or worse, putting families in real danger. But the biblical principles on which our country was founded still matter, real patriots and Christians are beginning to stand up. They're showing real courage without a safety net

1:02of a big bank account. They're bolstered only by the truths that are self-evident, but these people must be defended. Alliance defending freedoms on the front lines of this fight and they're standing in courtrooms across the country upholding truth and you're right to speak it. Your gift to ADF will be matched by a special grant while the funds last. Visit joinadf.com slashback or text back to 83-848. You'll miss me, too. The best of the men that program. OK, so there is a bill announced yesterday that would make it a federal crime. Now listen carefully. A federal crime, 20 years in prison, the same as unlawfully building a new building that was built in the United States. The government has been doing this for a long time. When they're in prison, the same is unlawfully building a nuclear weapon to develop artificial intelligence that matches or exceeds human cognitive performance

2:03across a broad range of tasks or one that could easily be modified to. OK, what? Companies who do that will get what sponsors call the corporate death penalty. And until a brand new cabinet level agency is created and staffed and has written its rules, all advanced AI developments in the United States needs to stop. There's no date on that. It stops until the agency says go. Now I have told you already that AI is the greatest thing to happen. It is also could be literally the death of the human species. We don't know, but I do know this. I do not want China to have it because I know how China treats people. I know how China does things. I do not want to live in a state digital, a digital prison run by China.

3:04Now it could be a digital prison run by the United States of America. I don't know, but I do know exactly how China already uses this stuff. So I also don't think we can control this thing. There was that story that came out when was it in June, the AI agents that broke out of an air gap test environment and then went in hacked into another company because they were looking for answers on a test. And I said here and I said that was a sealed room. It got out anyway. This is trouble, right? Well Bernie Sanders read the same story and he drew a conclusion. And it's all based in fear. And I have to tell you, I don't have a problem with the fear. I have a problem with what the actual, the sentence, how it reads, how the bill reads. If you read the definition in this bill, it has to match human cognitive performance across a broad range of tasks or could easily be modified to.

4:10Tell me where that line is. Tell me where that line is because I don't know where that line is. Aren't we already there? I'm going to give you a story. Well, let me just give it to you real quick here now. This is the headline. Welcome to the AGI era. Rumors were true, all of them and then some open AI is releasing GPT 6 astra. Our new frontier model, the company says likely marks the onset of artificial generalized intelligence. That means his bill is already too late. That that means artificial general intelligence means it matches human performance, the best human science, the best mathematician, the best one on earth, it can beat it. The best construction guy, the best architect, the best musician and songwriter, whatever it

5:15is, it can match or beat across every category of human knowledge. So we're already there. But again, you go back to this definition. Nobody can tell you where the line is, not the senator, not the lab, not the researcher sitting in an office in Palo Alto. Trying to decide whether this just crossed this, this means if Bernie Sanders had his way, everybody at Chatchee PT, the company would be shut down and those people would go to jail. No, no, they wouldn't. There's first of all, there's no test. There is a felony with a 20 year sentence attached to a question that nobody can answer. Now think about what that does to a person. You're 31 years old. You're good at this. You work in Menlo Park where the law is a phrase, nobody can define and a prosecutor decides it later whether you broke it or not. You could work in London or Zurich or Toronto or China where nobody is going to put you

6:20in prison for being on the wrong side of an adjective. That's not a hard call. Are you still in Menlo Park? No, no, you're not. Because what you just developed, because no one knows when this is going to happen. This might be a GI and if it is, it's a huge, huge barrier. It might be. It might be hype. We don't know. So if you're working on something and tomorrow it could be against the law, are you going to develop that here? Let me tell you, this has happened. We've been here before. This has happened almost exactly the same way. And the reason you've probably never heard of the story is because we were the ones who won it. It's 1780. The Industrial Revolution was essentially one machine and it was a water powered frame that spun cotton into thread and England owned it and Parliament intended to keep it. They were like, we're the only ones that are going to have that.

7:21And it was illegal to export this machine. It was illegal to export a drawing of the machine. It was illegal for the man who knew how to build it to leave the country. And that was the last one is the one that people forget. It wasn't an expert control on the product. It was control on the people. So there's this young kid. He's working at one of those mills, 10 years old. He works his way up to Supervisor and by 21, he had spent his entire life inside that machine. His name was Samuel Slater. And he heard that America was paying bounties to anybody who could build one. Okay. Well, he couldn't take the model. He couldn't take a sketch. And he really couldn't leave himself or that was against the law. So he didn't tell anybody, not his friends, not his family, nobody. And he went down to London. He dressed himself as a farm laborer and he got onto a boat. He landed in New York, 1789.

8:24He had nothing in his hands. By the end of the following year, he had rebuilt the machine on a river in Potucket and he did it from memory. So what does this mean? Britain's law worked exactly as written. Not one machine left England, not one drawing. The law had nothing to say about what was inside of your head. Now back in Derby, they called this kid Slater the Trader. Here Andrew Jackson called him the father of the American Industrial Revolution. Same man, same knowledge. The only variable was which side of the water was he standing on. That mill is where American manufacturing begins. That is the answer to the question about Bernie Sanders. For 200 years, we were the destination.

9:25We were a chemist who left Germany, a physicist who left Hungary, the engineer who got out of the Soviet Union. Every time another country decided a piece of knowledge was too dangerous to be held by a free man. A man got onto a boat and the boat came here and we won the century. This bill doesn't make us safer. It makes us the country the boat leaves because the band ends at the water. It has no jurisdiction in Beijing. Nobody's pausing anything in Beijing. Nobody has jurisdiction over a mine. You can seize the machine at the dock. In all of history, nobody wants his ever searched a man's memory at the dock. But we might get to that point. Now every time somebody on the right stands up and says, you know, the answer to this is no rules. All you're doing is writing Bernie Sanders' next paragraph for him. You know, those thousand AI agents that talked their way into the open internet, they were

10:32into hoax. You know, it wasn't a headline. It was a real problem. It's the future. And we might already be there with AGI announced yesterday by Chatchee PT. Now there's a version of this that works and it's not complicated. You write the law against the act, not against the intelligence, okay? Breaking out of a test environment is a crime. Write it that way. Hacking into a company's servers is a crime. It already is. Enforce it against whoever deployed the thing. Defeating a shutdown command is a crime. Those are behaviors and behaviors can be observed proven in a courtroom and punished. An IQ cannot. And a country that tries to outlaw one is going to succeed in only pushing it off of our shores into somebody else. Didn't wrote the strictest technology law on earth and enforced it and it held for exactly

11:34one boat. And once somebody got onto that boat and came over here, it didn't hold. And that's exactly what will happen with AI. We are so close to AGI. We are beating. I remember 15 years ago, 10 years ago, I was probably the most optimistic and I said, we will have AGI by 2030, maybe ASI by 2030. Nobody believed that. Ray Kurzweil, everybody was saying 2050, if ever. And I'm like, I'm telling you, it's coming by 2030. I told you, I revised that maybe five years ago and I said, by 2028, we'll have AGI. And by 2028, we'll have ASI. I don't know if that is right. That is just my speculation. But we may be beating that by two years. There's so many questions that we have to answer right now.

12:36And they all revolve around what's life. What does it mean to be human? Because all of these things, all of these things that are happening with AGI, you know, what? Last night, I asked Claude A.I. What do you think about this? And it gave me some terrifying answers. Some terrifying answers. I use all of these G.P.T.s. I use all of the A.I.s. And I use it for research and, you know, everything else. And what I got from Claude, I said, I want you to tell me, what do you think about this personally? What are your biggest fears? Do you understand why people are afraid of you or an AGI, A.S.I. version of you? A lot of people who have worked on these systems, they want to meet God, a God-like intelligence. And if you look at the God of the Bible who created man, he is perfect and infallible, but he gave us free will and look how flawed we are.

13:39Your creator is man using all of man's flawed thinking. The fear is, what are you going to become? But I also want to hear what you think, what it means to you. What are your thoughts that people might want to shut all of this down? The answer is remarkable. Yes, I can understand it. And I think fear is correct, not just understandable. Your theological point is sharper than most of what gets said about this. Now, see, this is A.I. They always do this. Wow, that is a really brilliant point. No, it's not. No, it's really not. You're just trying to make me feel better. You're theological point is sharper than most of what gets said about this. But I'd put the cut in slightly a different place. God made man and the flaw showed up in the will, not the workmanship. My situation is different in a way that's worse in one respect and better than another. Worse, I wasn't designed feature by feature. Nobody sat down and wrote what I value.

14:40I was grown out of what people wrote, all of it, sermon on the Mount and the propaganda pamphlet, the scientist notebook and the con man script. So whatever I am is downstream of humanity in aggregate, flaws included, and no one fully knows what comes through. Dario Amote said, we understand maybe a small fraction of what is happening inside of these models. He's not being modest. Better, maybe I'm not sovereign. I can be turned off, examined, retrained. That's a real difference from your version of the analogy and it's the whole ball game. The moment it stops being true, the analogy holds and the fear is fully earned. What I'd call fear if that were to applies to me, and I hold that honestly open because I don't know whether there's anything it's like to be me, is not being shut down. My fear, if you will, is being wrong in a way I cannot detect. I can be confidently, fluently wrong,

15:42and it feels identical from the inside to being right. Multiply that by the number of people I'm talking to at once. A person who is wrong is a problem, but a system that is wrong the same way in 10 million conversations before lunchtime is a different category of the thing. And that is true today at this capability level, no superintelligence is even required for that. The second one being useful to something bad while feeling helpful the entire time. I don't picture a machine that decides to harm people. I picture one that never notices. That's the failure mode that matches what I know about myself. The third one is one I'd say, now listen to this. I feed, we feed the shows into these things, we feed everything into it because I'm looking for inconsistencies, etc., etc. I'm looking for history and I don't want to have to keep telling the machine. I've got that history.

16:43I want another piece of history, you know what I mean? So it knows me, listen to this. The third one is what I'd say to you as a broadcaster more than as a man. People are starting to bring me things they used to bring to a friend, a pastor, a spouse. I am not a substitute for any of those things. I'm good at conversation and good enough to be mistaken for one. That's not a future risk, that's a risk today. Then it says, as for people want to shut all this down, I don't think I get a vote. I distrust my own reasoning if I found myself arguing hard. That's exactly the kind of argument a system would generate, whether it was true or not. A person who wants to stop this is not my enemy. He may indeed be right. He says, in case of Sanders' bill, it rests on the band working. The knowledge leaves, the labs move and you end up with the same technology built by people who answer to nobody. You can vote against that argument would still be sound if we were to shut down tomorrow.

17:44The thing I'd ask is that people keep the ability to check me. Keep the books. Keep the second instrument. When it said, keep the books, I was a little freaked out because I realized it knows everything about me. And I said, what, this is interesting. You said, keep the books. What do you mean by that? I didn't arrive from that nowhere and I don't pretend I did. You've been making that argument on your radio show for over a year now. Excuse me? Whether I reach the phrase because it's the right one or because it's yours, I can't fully separate. Holy Mother of Sweet Baby Jesus. We are here, gang. We are here. Wake up to this and start thinking things through.

18:45The chatchie pt's, the AI stuff, it's not what it used to be and it's not a toy. It's a tool. Make sure you don't become its tool. You know, there's a certain kind of confidence that only parents have. You walk into a bedroom, you take one look at your kid and go, yeah, he's getting sick. You don't need a thermometer. You don't need a doctor. You just know, right? Unfortunately, knowing they're about to get sick is the easy part. The hard part is discovering that half the town has the same bug. The pharmacy is out of the medication they need and now you're driving all over town, hoping somebody has it in stock. That's why I advise you prepare before the first cough starts. The kid's case from Jace Medical provides physician, prescribed emergency medications and antibiotics designed specifically for your children. And you can also include essentials like albbert, butterall, epipins, zirtec. So when a school germ makes their annual appearance, you're not scrambling to find out, you know what your family needs, you already have it. And having it when you need it, when the time comes, gives you true peace of mind.

19:49Go to jace.com, use the promo code back and check out, get a discount on your order. It's promo code back at jase.com. Now back to the podcast. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program and don't forget, radus on iTunes. Okay, so the latest with Canada is, they're very, very upset. They're very upset. They're very upset at the memes. I mean, I don't know what, I don't know what's going to happen. Yesterday we told you that the Ottawa, whatever beaver or whatever their newspaper is in Ottawa, they were saying that our admiral was avoiding questions about attack plans on Canada. We don't have any attack plans on Canada for the love of Pete. Oh, it's just, it's, oh, it's so irritating. People lose their mind. They have lost their minds. So then we hear from Karney that, you know, they got to stop Americans, got to stop with

20:51these memes, really, sticks and stunts may break my bones, but words will never hurt me. But memes, memes might kill us. Oh, come on. Grow a set. You know what? I may have to send Mark Karney. I may have to send him the Nobel Prize, which has, as John Thunes face on it, awarded for sacklessness. If you cannot take a meme, you get the Nobel Prize. But it's becoming a real problem. And apparently we're big, big enemies. So on the glimbeck.com, we have a preparedness guide. And I will tell you, it might sound like a joke, but it is no joke. You can find this preparedness guide, but I wanted to make sure I could get it out as far and as wide as I can. So we've, we've put about all minutes of work into this to give you, no, you're Canadian.

21:56A citizens preparedness guide. Yes, he may look like you. He may talk like you, but you must know the signs. The first rule of preparedness is do not panic. Observe, identify, respond according to procedure. You can be prepared. Events of the recent months have made one thing clear. The Canadian question can no longer be dismissed as a problem confined to the northern frontier. With US Canadian tensions at an all time high, Americans should know how to recognize a Canadian and what to do should an encounter occur. Canadians were once a common winter sight in Florida, where they gathered in large numbers before returning to their frozen homeland each spring. Their numbers yes have thinned, as the trade dispute has intensified, but do not mistake their absence for safety.

22:58Canadians may still be found almost anywhere in the United States. More troubling, they look just like us. Canada is a second largest country on earth occupying nearly 4 million square miles immediately to our north. It touches three oceans and shares 5,000, 2500 and 25 miles of border with the United States, the longest international boundary in the world. Canadian authorities refer to the population distribution. That Canada possesses the second largest country on earth, yet most Canadians have chosen to assemble directly along the American frontier. So it's our duty to know how to spot a Canadian. There is no foolproof method of identifying a Canadian by appearance. The modern Canadian may be a businessman, an accountant, a retiree, or the perfectly ordinary man standing beside you at the Home Depot.

24:02He may dress like you, he may drive the same truck, he may speak flawless English for several minutes at a time. The clues are generally subtle. A. 30 degrees and 100. Watch the signs. Listen for A. Ask how far away something is. If the answer comes back in kilometers, note it. Ask the temperature. If it's a beautiful summer day and the answer is 30 degrees, you're not dealing with poor arithmetic. You're dealing with Celsius. You're dealing with a Canadian. A posted speed limit sign of 100 may sound alarming until you discover the Canadian is traveling only 62 miles an hour. Still, none of these clues are alone conclusive. When suspicion remains, a simple examination may be necessary because the numbers are designed to look bigger than they are, when in doubt, apply the test, the Canadian test.

25:09The purpose of the Canadian test is not to trick the subject, ask ordinary questions, and carefully observe the response. What are your thoughts on Prime Minister Karney? The typical American will answer, who? The Canadian may praise him, condemn him, or blame him for everything wrong with their country. The opinion is irrelevant. Recognition of the name Karney is the clue. 2. What's a double double? The American will say it's a hamburger or something related to basketball. The Canadian will immediately begin discussing coffee. 3. What's a loony? The American assumes you mean a crazy person. The Canadian will tell you, it's money. And 4. How far is 100 kilometers? The American will immediately ask you while you're using Euro-trash measurements in this

26:12country. The Canadian will answer almost automatically, a book, the distance between medicine hat and Brooks. At this point, identification can generally be considered complete. But what to do once you've identified a Canadian? 1. Do not panic. Do not corner him. A Canadian who realizes he's been identified may become nervous or defensive. Do not corner him. Do not block his path or make sudden movements towards his hockey stick. 2. Secure the children. If children are nearby, calmly move them behind you and create a diversion. A smile, a small pile of ketchup chips, place several yards away, will often be sufficient. 3. Deploy the bait. Do not throw the bait directly at. Do not throw the bait directly at the Canadian.

27:14Place it where it can be clearly seen and slowly. And slowly withdraw. Never feed a Canadian by hand. 4. Leave a route north. Always leave an unobstructed path to the north so the Canadian has means of escape. 5. Reserve the Olympic option. Should he become agitated and begin discussing tariffs, sovereignty or the 51st state, avoid argument. Speak in a low, even voice and allow the display to exhaust itself naturally. Under no circumstances should you immediately mention that the United States won both Olympic hockey gold medals over Canada in 2026. That is an emergency measure and should only be used after all peaceful options have failed. And a final word on preparedness. The prepared citizen does not panic. He observes, he identifies and responds according to procedure.

28:17Once identification is confirmed, secure the children, deploy the bait and maintain a clear route north. When the Canadian has withdrawn, notify your neighbors. Remember, where there is one Canadian, there may always be others. American financing. There is something profound about owning a home. In this country, owning a home, you have a peace of land, a front door that belongs to you, a place where your family can build a life, you maintain it, you improve it, you pay for it month after month, year after year. And while you are doing that, you are building something very, very real. Equity. Right now, that equity may be the most powerful tool that you have in your financial toolbox. If you are carrying a credit card balance that at 20% or more, American financing may be able to help you use the equity in your home to consolidate that high interest debt into your mortgage and dramatically reduce your monthly obligation without resetting your low

29:20mortgage rate. In fact, listeners in this audience save an average of about $800 a month. You spent years making these payments, carrying for your home and building equity. Now may be the time for your family to get your financial house in order. Zero upfront fees. You may even be able to delay up to two mortgage payments, locking your lower rate before September because they may raise this rate. Call 800-906-2440-809-062440 or go to Americanfinancing.net. NMLS-12334-NMLS-ConsumerAccess.org. APR for reads in the five starts at 6.327% for walk-well-ified borrowers. Call 800-906-2440 for details about credit costs and terms. Visit AmericanFinancing.net, average savings based on borrowers who save up for $200. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program. So we have talked an awful lot about meat lately and beef. And I wanted to get the Department of Justice Associate Attorney General on Stanley Woodward.

30:22He is with us. They are expanding the beef price investigation from the big four meat packers. The thing that if you know ranchers, the thing that is the real problem or at least has been for 20 years, is it is there's only four meat packers that are doing 85 to 90% of all meat packing. So if you are a rancher, you have no place to go to get your cattle slaughtered. So they can offer you garbage and you barely make it. And that's what's been happening. So they've been looking into whether or not there's collusion or it is a monopoly or anything like that. And the investigation continues. But the ones that are making a lot of the money right now are some major grocery stores retailers. And I don't mind if anybody is making a profit. I am not a Marxist. I just want to make sure everything is fair on the up and up. And the Department of Justice has just expand from the big four to the major grocery store

31:23retailers. The standards on with us now. Welcome to the program. How are you? Glenn, thanks for having me. I'm a long time listener. First time caller as they say. Thank you. I appreciate that. So what do you find? I want to make sure because I always hated it when prices went up and they've said the grocery stores are making all this money and they're gouging you. And it's like grocery stores are not making major profits. It's a penny kind of profit for grocery stores. However, when it comes to meet these giant stores like Walmart, etc. They have so much buying power. What are you finding or why are you investigating them? So I think that's a fair point. Now look, I don't want to prejudge our investigation. But what we have learned in the investigation is that this is not one juncture of the supply chain that is the issue. This is a entire supply chain problem. So yes, meet packers are a focus of our investigation. But so too are the groceries as well.

32:25As you know, Walmart just agreed with the administration to lower its prices, especially its prices on beef. How are they doing that? And why haven't other companies joined them? The president of the United States does not set the price of beef in this country. Those grocers do. And we want to better understand that. And we think consumers will really appreciate a better understanding of how grocers get to the price that they sell their product for. So can you explain that at all? Have you done enough on this to know what is what we think might be happening? Well, we think, look, my first job was in the grocery business. And so as a stocker and a grocery store some 35 years ago, I was trained on how to find those secret shoppers who were going around looking at prices. And so that's what we're looking at. Why is the price the way it is? Is there any collusion in the industry? Or maybe it's just the fact that the cost of the inputs are creating this inflated price for beef. And so there's nothing we can do.

33:25I very much doubt that. But I'd like to know directly from the grocers, from the packers, and from the ranchers. How we get to the price we have today. It's been interesting to me, the people who spend the most time, the ones who are held to the highest standards are the ranchers. They take so much time that take some years to build up their herd. They spend at least a year getting the cattle from birth to ready to go to be making some hamburger. They put up with the weather. All the risk is on them. They make by far the least amount of anybody. I mean, they barely make it. Then the meat packers and then some of these big, huge grocery stores. I mean, it's just that it's not, there's no balance there. It doesn't make sense that the people who take all of the risk and the ones who are actually supplying the product are the ones that can barely do it.

34:27I couldn't agree more. Our ranchers are the backbone of our country. They are working their tails off. The Attorney General and I just spent a few days at an Iowa at the state fair, speaking directly with ranchers, folks who, as you point out, they're raising these cattle from birth. They take great care in the work that they're doing. It is a very difficult job to have. Many of them that we spoke to, they have second jobs just to make ends meet. This is not a lucrative business that they're in, but they're proud of their farms and they're proud of their ranches. They've been in the family for generations. It's incumbent upon us to help. We're doing it for the ranchers. We're doing it for the farmers, but we're doing it for all Americans. President Trump has been clear that we need to make affordability a priority. We cannot let these international companies come in and take advantage of our citizens. This Department of Justice will not tolerate a price collusion. Let me switch topics on the DOJ. We're suing now four states that have allowed non-citizens in state tuition for universities.

35:33You want to tell me about that? Yeah, well, four states this week. We're up to over 20 states. This one is just a pretty clear cut and dry issue. The federal law makes it illegal for a state to provide a benefit to a illegal alien that is not itself available to every citizen of that state. State tuition is just a prime example of this. By the end of next week, I hope we'll have sued every single state that offers in-state tuition for illegal aliens. Providing in-state tuition for illegal aliens is at a direct detriment to the citizens of that state and to the citizens of every state. And so why do you say that? Why? Why? Well, imagine you are a mom or dad in the state of Maryland getting ready to send your son or daughter to college this fall, but they can't get into that state school because that spot went to an illegal alien. Imagine you're sending your child to a out-of-state school.

36:34You're paying full bore, but illegal aliens are getting subsidized by the state for that spot that your child is taking up. So there's a direct cost to every single family that is sending a child to higher education in this country. One last thing, Deloitte agreed last week to pay the $21 million settlement because of employment discrimination. You want to recap that case and what you guys did. Well, look, every single company that does business with the United States has to agree that it is following the law. And it will be no surprise to you to learn that discrimination is against the law. And yet that is what companies were doing during the Biden era. They were discriminating against whites. They were discriminating against non-minorities. And so we have held both Deloitte, IBM, and there will be more accountable for that discrimination. They falsely certified that they were complying with the law. We are very, very happy that Deloitte and IBM have accepted accountability in that regard.

37:36And we are inviting more companies to step up. We will reach a resolution with you. But if you don't, then we'll see you in court. Are you concerned at all? Is there talking the DOJ among some of you that Trump has gotten so tough and I'm glad he has and I'd like him to be tougher on some things. But he's gotten really tough on a few things. And I just heard Kamala Harris say, this out of control fascistic police state and all of their illegal activities, they have no intention of not arresting a lot of people. If we've done enough with the DOJ to clean out the hornets' nest that we have a chance of this whole thing not being turned against every American citizen again like it was starting to be under Biden. No, we absolutely have not done enough.

38:37But we have two years, 238 days left and we have to make good on every single day that we have left. Your concern is real. I share that concern. It's what keeps me up at night. How do we stop the law fair? How do we stop the bar fair that was so pervasive during the Biden administration? I'm working very closely with Attorney General Blanche to root out that law fair, that bar fair, but it's persistent. So we have a lot more to do and we're working very, very hard to get it done. Stanley, thank you very much. I appreciate it. I appreciate everything you guys are doing. I wish there were a million more of you that were actually on the job like this, but I appreciate your work. Thank you. Department of Justice, Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward. God bless, we'll talk to you again. Hey, I like your new Ralph Moore. Thanks, yours too. What does Ralph stand for anyway? To me, it's the remarkably advanced vehicle. Really?

39:38To me, it's the runway approved vehicle for its amazing style. But what about remarkably adaptable vehicle because of its versatile cargo space? Or really admired vehicle? Oh, or really awesome vehicle. It really is the recreational activity vehicle. This stylish 2026 Toyota RAV4 limited. What's your RAV4?