BLM Activists Forced To Pay Millions For Doxxing Child

In this video, I discuss a recent jury decision to award a boy in Texas who was targeted by a BLM hate campaign, harassed & doxxed $3.2 million due to the fact that the entire reason for the campaign was based on yet another BLM race hoax

Website: https://www.actualjusticewarrior.com/

https://linktr.ee/ActualJustice

Odysee: https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2

Rumble: https://rumble.com/ActualJusticeWarrior

Instagram NEW: https://www.instagram.com/actualjustice/

Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/actualjusticewarrior

2nd Channel: https://www.youtube.com/ajw2dreamscometrue

TeeSpring Store: https://teespring.com/stores/actualjusticewarrior

New Store: https://actualjusticewarrior.myspreadshop.com/

https://www.minds.com/actualjusticewarrior

Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SeanFitzgerald

Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/Iamsean90

Venmo: https://venmo.com/iamsean90

Support me on Subscribe Star: https://www.subscribestar.com/seanfitzgerald

Gab: https://gab.com/Iamsean90

Twitter https://twitter.com/iamsean90 

Backup Twitter https://twitter.com/AJWSean

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/actualjusticewarrior/

Discord: https://discord.gg/c7PGFFp

3rd: https://www.youtube.com/user/DudeMonkeyHQ

Podcast Links:

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1o0q86AVIzH1ZhCl8pe3du?si=e260b6ab98d64e74

Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/actual-justice-warrior/id1637748971

Sources:

NYPost Article: https://nypost.com/2026/02/18/us-news/texas-teen-asher-vann-awarded-3-2m-jury-verdict-after-viral-racist-bullying-claims/

Local News Segment From The Time Of The Incident: https://youtu.be/7QjMt0pD25I?si=TyLyXvcd8RsBfmRN

Segment About The Verdict From The Jury: https://youtu.be/mTAKfpxR1dg?si=m6jHAaM5ezKWLpnx

Fox News Interview: https://youtu.be/zE2Sp1z-JdM?si=TvaTP4_6bm5RuAEZ

Extended Interview (Clips Not Used): https://youtu.be/XaCaM_cV1KU?si=5GPTwFcydEjuAIWh

#PlanoTexas #BLMHoax #IamSean90 

FAIR USE NOTICE

This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.