Building a Social Contract to Dismantle the BeastSystem — James Roguski | Jerm Warfare

Tyler Reddick here from 2311 Racing.

Victory Lane?

Yeah, it's even better with Chamba by my side.

Race to chambacacino.com, let's Chamba.

No purchase necessary, VTW Group,

voidware prohibited by law, CTNCs, 21 Plus,

sponsored by ChambaCacino.

James Rogaski Roguski, thank you for joining me in the trenches.

I like Roguski.

It reminds me of Top Gun, Mavericks.

Mavericks friend, Goose.

There you go.

Do you consider yourself a Maverick?

You know, probably I consider myself just seeking the truth.

When I turned, I think it was 62.

I'm 65 years old now, but a couple of years ago at my birthday,

somebody asked me, what do you do and how did you get into it?

And they also asked me what my zodiac sign was.

So I'm born in the end of April, and so I'm

born into the sign of Taurus the Bull.

And it wasn't until I was 67 years old,

that I realized that I'm perfectly suited for what I do,

which is whenever I step in some bullshit, I point it out.

And there's a lot of it going around these days.

And most of it is coming from our governments.

And that seems to be the theme.

If you read something from your government,

it's probably manipulative.

It's probably a lie.

It's probably something that someone who

has some lobbying influence over government

has gotten government to do their bidding.

And the concept of the will of the people

being done by the people that we hire to work for us

to participate in government, man, have we lost sight of that?

It's a mess.

It's an enormous mess.

And I'm not going to pretend to say that I know the answer,

because it is such a deep mess and the corruption is so deep.

And so much of our lives is influenced by it.

We have a problem.

And many people understand that, and they're

working very hard to try to find a solution to it.

And I don't think the solution is more government.

I think the solution is going to be very, very difficult

to find, and it's going to require

some dramatic, horrific changes.

I'm not necessarily advocating burning it all down

and starting over, but I used to work in construction.

And sometimes what you need to do is realize

that the building is decrepit.

And it needs to be torn down.

And you don't want to get caught in the crumbling

of the structure falling on top of you.

But sometimes you need to tear it all down and start over.

And we're pretty gone close to that place right now,

all around the world, regardless of where you may be.

So are you suggesting revolution rather than evolution?

You know, revolution just means going around in circles

and coming back to where you were.

So we need a better word.

We certainly need change.

We need to look at the systems that are in place,

whether it's health, which has been mostly my focus.

Public health is a joke.

That's probably mostly what I want to talk about with you.

But personal health, money, communications, industry,

business, work, every aspect of our life,

we need to be able to reevaluate it.

And one of the things that people don't use this word

very often, but a social contract amongst each other,

how do we agree to live with each other?

And so if you're talking about money and all

of the concerns about global digital currencies,

central bank digital currencies, programmed money,

oh, it must have been in the late 40s or early 50s.

I could just imagine somebody sitting in a bar

had a flash of an idea and said, hey, I got this great idea.

Let's make little pieces of plastic

and we'll get people to use that for money.

And we'll scam 2, 3, 4, 5% off the top.

And if you said that in a bar 70, 80 years ago,

people would think you're drunk and you're crazy.

Nobody's ever going to go for that.

That's insane.

But look at our universe right now.

The banks and the holders of credit cards

create money every time you use one of those credit cards,

they create money out of nowhere to scam off the top.

And the vast majority of people have no comprehension whatsoever

about what a racket money is.

And it's all digital.

It's just not yet programmable.

But it's pretty darn close to that.

And most people have been using digital money for their whole life.

What percentage, everybody in the audience ask yourself,

what percentage of all of the transactions

that you've ever made in your life were

done with physical money, right?

Very little of it.

And so that whole system is corrupt.

And it has been for our entire life.

And we're just going along because nobody's

come up with a better idea.

And I'm not saying I have the answer.

I'm saying, you can certainly see the problem.

And so with our health, it's probably

the thing that I spent most of my life dealing with.

I've been blessed.

I've been lucky.

I think I've been smart and intelligent about it.

But I'm 65.

I'm healthy.

And you couldn't pay me to go to a medical doctor.

I haven't been to one since I was 19.

And you couldn't pay me to take an aspirin.

You couldn't pay me to take a pharmaceutical medication,

because I understand their system.

Their system is not designed to make you healthy.

Their system is designed to poison you slowly

under the belief that swallowing a poison

will change the symptoms of warning signs

of whatever it is you may be dealing with.

And the latest thing with the COVID-19

jabs and all the things associated with it

is just the quintessential example of industry

lying with the help of government.

And that is the definition of fascism

when corporations and governments work together

to take advantage of everyday people.

I think the entire world has become a corporate government

collusion, fascism around the world.

And we the people are just casualties of war at this point.

What is the purpose of a doctor?

Well, it's supposed to be a teacher, okay?

It's supposed to be someone who has knowledge

and wisdom and experience.

And in my view, okay, which is different

than I think what is going on in the world.

And that wasn't the question I thought you were gonna ask me.

It was to help people comprehend and identify

the cause and the source of their problem.

Now, there's always an exception to every rule,

but I could almost guarantee you

that the source of anybody's health problem

is not a chronic deficiency of a pharmaceutical medication.

That's just not what it is.

And so if you use your car as an example,

if the red light goes off on the dashboard

and there's something wrong with your car,

if you went to the mechanic and asked them,

could you fix the light on my car?

That's analogous to having symptoms, right?

The classic symptoms people call a cold, sneezing, coughing,

tear eyes, running nose, fever, maybe diarrhea

and sweating, and these are attempts of your body

to get rid of something.

And people look at that and they don't ask,

well, what have I been doing that my body's trying

to get rid of something, right?

Let me help my body get rid of it and then you're done.

No, they suppress those symptoms,

whether it's the symptoms of the cold or a flu

or an allergy or whatever it may be, toxic poisoning.

And so drugs just suppress the lights on the dashboard.

If you're not feeling well,

your doctor should ask you a thousand questions

and find out from you, what is it

that you've been doing or not doing?

What's in your environment, what's in your mind,

what's in your psyche, what's going on with you

as an individual and you have to make those changes?

Well, that's not their model.

Their model is to talk to you for five minutes,

identify your symptoms, identify

and ICD 10 code, international classification of disease

run by the WHO.

Oh, let's put you in a box.

Let's redefine you as having this ailment

and then they can follow a protocol.

I was reading Dr. Brine artist's book today,

or I'm sorry, yesterday.

And in the beginning, he talks about his,

losing his stepfather, he died in the hospital

because they followed protocol.

They ignored what they were looking at.

They made a misdiagnosis, which is where everything starts.

I joke that I was born with a terminal illness.

It's called James Rogusky Syndrome.

I've been managing it for 65 years.

It's chronic.

Eventually, it'll probably get me, right?

But at the moment, I'm handling it pretty well.

If anybody were to ever try to label me

as being a cancer patient or a heart patient

or diabetic or this or that, I think,

they're not paying attention to you as an individual.

And so if your doctor is paying attention to you

and trying to help you figure out why you have

whatever disease you have,

then maybe that doctor is worth keeping.

If they're just diagnosing you,

which means two people don't know,

die to a, not, no says to know.

When you're diagnosed, it's just so that they can put

in a form to get paid and follow a protocol

that doesn't have anything to do with you.

It's got everything to do with what drug companies say

is going to hide your symptoms.

And so, are there any doctors out there?

There's maybe a few, but not in the medical,

pharmaceutical profession.

That's for sure.

Well, let me zoom out.

What is the purpose of the WHO?

Well, their stated purpose is to guarantee the right

of health to everybody.

And health and healthcare are not rights.

They are different.

You are supposed to have the right

to make your own decisions.

So the right to decide whatever it is you do

to care for your own health is not your right.

It's also your responsibility.

What the WHO has morphed into,

especially in the last 20, 25 years or so,

is a cartel or really the marketing arm

of the pharmaceutical cartel.

I woke up one morning and I had been reporting on the WHO

and the director general of the WHO

through the international health regulations

has the authority to make a declaration.

For whatever reason, when he decides he wants to,

he can declare a fake.

A public health emergency of international concern.

Hey, there's something going on,

some corner of the world, everybody should be afraid.

Well, that acronym, P-H-E-I-C,

I woke up one morning and what I heard inside my head

was the pharmaceutical hospital emergency industrial complex.

And so they basically are promoters for big pharma.

You know, because we've talked about it a number of times,

I've reported on their negotiations for amendments

to the international health regulations

and now they're in the middle still,

to this day, despite what people have reported,

they're still trying to finish the negotiations

for the pandemic agreement.

And in the interim agreements that they have so far,

they've agreed that pandemic emergency products

are only pharmaceuticals, drugs, devices, vaccines,

and also cell and gene-based therapies,

not to mention all of the diagnostics, which are fraudulent.

So if they can get people to take a test

and believe that they have an ailment,

that another poison is the treatment for,

it's really great for business.

And so what they're negotiating is a system

by which I kid you not what they have on the table right now

are sample contracts that nations would sign

with corporations with the WHO as a signatory middleman

if they find a pathogen or if they create one

in a computer or if artificial intelligence

creates a genetic sequence that they claim

would be pathogenic, they want companies

to sign contracts to share the profits.

So what they're really negotiating

with the pandemic agreement is a cartel

that I call the organization of pandemic emergency corporations.

They are being fascists, they want government

to work with industry to take advantage of we the people.

This is the theme, people use words like fascism

and socialism and communism and capitalism

and all this sort of thing.

The core definition of fascism isn't about left wing,

right wing, you can be a left wing fascist

or right wing fascist, you can be all kinds of things.

When you see government supporting corporations

at the expensive people, call it whatever you want to call it.

That is where we are right now in the world

and it's horrible.

And if government and the people in government

are gonna continue to support corporations

rather than support the freedoms and rights of people,

there's just gonna be problems.

People are ultimately either going to become sheep

and just give in and submit to the authority

of your government and we're gonna live in 1984

or we're gonna stand up and defend our rights

and freedoms as men, women and children

and it's not gonna be easy

because if you look at your life, I mean right now,

we're communicating through a system

that's owned by a corporation, okay?

Now there's a lot of movements to have

more responsible corporations

or cooperative structure behind that system

but what we're dealing with is not designed

to support individual rights, freedoms and choice,

it's designed to turn a profit off the expense of people.

And until that changes, we're gonna continue having problems.

You're also referred to as a global power grab.

I don't know that maybe I have used that term in the past

but while that is the case, I think that it's,

they've already got the power,

they've already got the structure

and if you look at it from a much,

you said earlier, like take a step back

and look at a bigger picture,

let's think a really big step back

and look at an even bigger picture.

Whatever your beliefs may be,

if you believe in some type of creator,

call it God, call it whatever you wanna call it,

bring that down a notch and if you create something,

it's yours, you have control of it.

If you write a book, if you create some kind of artwork,

you know, whatever, whoever creates something

should never be controlled by the thing

that you have created, okay?

I don't have children, but people get together,

they have children and at the age of 18,

you set the child free in most societies.

I guess many times children could try to control

over their parents, but essentially,

what we have done is put ourselves

in the position of being controlled by our own creations.

If God created men, women and children,

and we created government,

we've allowed government to then create corporations

and then corporations create the scenario

where we submit ourselves to their authority

by siding some kind of an agreement with them

and we put ourselves under the corporation

as a subject, as a customer, as a user,

as whatever terminology they might have,

if it's a social media company,

when you sign your agreement with them,

you subject yourself to that agreement

and you give up all of your rights,

but maybe unknowingly, but, you know,

well, you want the benefits of doing business

with that company, whatever it may be,

or working for that company,

and you give up your rights that you have

as not just the creator of that corporation,

but the creator of the government

that created that corporation.

And so when you allow yourself to be made subservient

to something that is supposed to serve you,

government is supposed to serve people.

Corporations are supposed to serve people

through the creation and government,

but somehow it's been turned around.

And if you really want to get deep,

here's a thought for you.

What if the quote unquote anti-Christ

is actually the system that connects all of this?

So if you could visualize,

let's start with the United Nations, okay?

I'm not saying they're necessarily at the top of it,

but they're pretty close up there.

The United Nations is connected to all of its member nations,

and through subsidiaries like the WHO,

you know, many nations are connected through there.

All of those nations, if you could just envision

the organogram, you know, the chart of the organization,

look at the United Nations with all of the 193,

I think it is countries that are members,

but then look at all of the governments

that each of those countries have.

Take any nation, maybe they're divided into provinces

or states or whatever term they may have subsidiary units, okay?

Then you take that in the United States to the county

and the city, you know, on the local level.

Then off of each one of those government entities

that have the authority to create corporations

on your organization chart, put, you know,

all of the corporations that are created by that government.

Look at all of the non-profits,

look at all the foundations, okay?

Then look at all of the public schools.

Look at everything that the government licenses,

and you'll realize that the market,

not the market to be, but the actual beast system

is already in place.

How many people never deal

with that enormous beast?

How many people are, you know, out in the woods,

living freely, self-sufficient, taking care of themselves?

Everybody, just about, on every day of their life,

interacts with the beast, and that beast

is the system that we've created.

And, you know, no one government official,

no prime minister, no president, no pope, you know,

forgot about churches and religion, you know,

add all of that in there, too, right?

That system should be seen as anti-freedom.

And so, you know, if the Christos, if Christ is, you know,

the bit of divinity that's inside of you,

the anti-Christ is the system that controls you,

or attempts to, and so we deal every day

with the system that is a beast,

and who among us thinks that they have the power

to slay that beast?

You're lucky if you can hide from it now.

It's got cameras everywhere.

And so, people are looking for, you know,

who's going to be born in the world

and it's going to be called the anti-Christ?

We've birthed the anti-Christ for generations.

It's the system that controls you.

A lot of times, you know, people will say they,

right now, they are doing this to you,

they are doing that to you.

Well, who is they?

You know, they, somebody told me,

friend of mine, you know, it's an acronym

for the hierarchy in slaving you.

That is the beast system,

and until we understand that whether it's the,

you know, South African or UK or Australian

or Canadian or United States or Ukrainian

or Russian government, it is the system.

You know, it used to be in the 60s,

people would refer to it as the man, okay?

Well, maybe that's, you know, sexist

because women are part of that system as well.

But the government, religious, corporate,

banking money system, the system

is what is ruining our individual lives.

Then you take artificial intelligence

and put it on top of that and, you know,

global bank, central bank digital currencies

and everything like that.

It's just an adjunct to the system

that we've been living under our entire life.

Call it the matrix if you want, okay?

But it's a beast and we need to slay it.

And it's not gonna be easy because we welcome

to depend on it.

How?

You first have to understand that that is

what the problem is, okay?

You're not gonna elect new people to take a position

and change the system.

The system is the problem, okay?

The corporate banking, education,

religious, government system on every level.

Once you become aware that that is the matrix,

that is the beast, that is the system

that is controlling your life and you step up

and you say, no, maybe not you because, you know,

the United States is about to celebrate

it's 250th birthday next year.

I wasn't around 250 years ago,

so I didn't create it, but, you know,

proverbially we, the people created our government.

It needs to be dissolved.

It needs to be rethought.

It needs to be reworked.

It needs to be, I don't wanna say birds down,

okay, because that implies violence

and ideally we can do this in the way that is not violent.

And, unfortunately, what typically happens

in violent revolutions is they just put back

a different version of the same damn thing, okay?

What we need is to recognize the spark of divinity

within each of us and respect it.

And, you know, it's different systems for interacting.

Do we need corporations?

Should corporations be given the rights of people

and rights that are more than the rights

that people enjoy?

Well, how in that all, okay?

You know, our cooperatives a little bit

of a step in a better direction, maybe, okay?

With religion, you know, whatever belief you may have,

understand that belief is what you do when you don't know.

So, if you believe that somebody in an organized religion

can lead you to God, well, that's a totally different thing

than it's taught in many religions,

which is you need to find God and that inside of you.

And so, if you believe that nonprofit organizations

bringing this back to the WHO in these negotiations,

there are 400 relevant stakeholders

who are participating in negotiations

that the vast majority of the world's population

has no idea or even happening.

Well, these 400 organizations have gotten language put

in place in both the financial aspect

of the International Health Regulation Amendments.

So, that's over and done.

They got that put in place and in the pandemic agreement,

it's just awaiting the final negotiations.

The same language is in there.

That money is put aside for any organizations

that help with what has been negotiated in these agreements.

Well, the reason they want the pandemic agreement

to go through is because they're going to be

on the receiving end of a lot of the money

that's going to flow through this cartel.

And so, you know, is it right that corporations

and relevant stakeholders are involved in these negotiations?

And we, the people have no say whatsoever.

We're not even allowed to watch.

This is the problem.

Our creations have taken control of our lives.

And we need to assert our right and responsibility

as the creator of government,

which then charters corporations,

or nonprofits, or religions, or whatever.

We have to stand above it and understand our place

and not subjugate ourselves by signing contracts

that give away our rights and freedoms

for some benefit, whether it's a government benefit

or some type of service from a corporation or whatever it might be.

Okay, but then again, how?

How do we do it?

Well, you have to recognize the problem.

Okay.

If you see them.

Let me be more specific.

Okay, so we recognize a problem.

Good.

All right, now what?

I'm not pretending to be able to offer an answer

for the entire thing.

What I am saying is we need to start working on

what I would call a new social contract.

How do we want to deal with each other

in a way that is different than government?

What you're kind of alluding to then is

kind of building communities and parallel networks

and that kind of thing, which is the sort of thing

that we've been talking about for years.

If you could envision, certainly in the United States,

whenever we seem to have some type of natural disaster,

a flood, a hurricane, a tornado, earthquake, whatever it may be,

the government agencies who are supposed to be there

during the emergencies, get in the way.

They literally stop people from helping

where people who have survived the tragedy,

they get their trucks, they get their boats,

they get whatever it is they need to do.

They donate money and supplies

and they go into harm's way to get people out of danger.

We rely on each other because when it's most needed,

government fails and ultimately there is an unspoken bond

amongst people where, hey, you may not even know them,

but you're able to help, you're in a situation

where you're right there and you can help, so you do.

And I think the vast majority of people

have that goodness in their heart

and they would certainly do that.

Some people may try to take advantage of it,

but the government just gets in the way, okay?

And so there was another word that you said

that had me triggered off on another idea.

Now I think I forgot what it was

where you had mentioned something,

but the point is, what is the parallel systems and networks?

Thank you.

And so do we need government, mind control

or do we need cooperation?

Do we need a looser network where it's not

that we hire and choose a representative

to tell us what to do?

That's not how government is supposed to be,

it has morphed into that.

And as long as people view government

as that which controls your mind, okay?

If we're even talking about government,

we're barking up the wrong tree, okay?

We need a different type of organized social contract.

And so it's one of the things that I'm working on,

a newsocialcontract.com.

I'll give you the link, you can put it in the thing.

I'm not saying I have all the answers.

I'm saying that in each and every aspect

of existence, whether it's money or health

or education, communications, transportation,

there are new methods that are available to us

as technology and innovation comes forth.

There's new things that we have to deal with

that the people who created our government 250 years ago,

had no idea these things were gonna come up.

We need new ways to organize our society.

Maybe where computers and artificial intelligence

and robotics do a lot of the hard work,

but if they are our creations,

they have to be under our control.

Not under the control of an oligarch who owns a company,

who got a government grant to do some research,

to create some type of software or robotics

that then makes them gobs and gobs of money

while everyone else is unemployed

and begging just for survival.

We need an entirely new and different

organizational structure and it's not government

and it's not corporations and it's not religions.

What might it be?

Well, we have to put our heads together,

we have to have those discussions

and you know me, I'll do it right now.

I always give people my phone number.

If this is a topic that you want to discuss,

give me a phone call.

I'm in California, so you may have to do a country code

to the United States,

but my phone number in California is 310-619-3055.

Put it in the notes for the description of the video.

I'm not saying I have the answer,

but I'm saying that I can identify

that we're not going to find the answer

in government and corporations and religions

and nonprofits and all of the structures that we have.

Those structures have become the proverbial beast

that is controlling our lives

and none of us really are able to live freely

as long as that beast survives.

We need to slay it.

We need to create a new system that respects our rights

and is of benefit to each and every one of us.

While giving every person the freedom to live

their lives the way their spirit inside tells them to live.

You talk about creating the system

and I'm just wondering James, if some of it is but a sign,

some of it's by emergence.

By emergence, can you explain what you mean by emergence?

You mean by emergency, by necessity or just...

No, no, no, it came to be organically.

Well, is there a large mind behind the beast system

that has put ideas into people so that we think we've built it

but it's been built by a greater intelligence

than each and every one of us.

So you're really getting into some esoteric stuff

that I'd love to talk about.

I'll ask you and your audience a question

that I think opens up some curiosity.

Where do you believe ideas come from?

Do you own your idea?

Did it come from you?

Did you create it?

Or is it an idea that is coming through you?

You've tapped into it.

And maybe it was thought by somebody else.

I've had many experiences in life

where an idea comes in.

And after the fact, you recognize that,

well, many people around the world have that idea.

You're not the first one to have that idea, okay?

You might be the first one who voices it, okay?

But where do ideas come from?

And how do you know that what seems to be a good idea

is actually a very well crafted psychological operation

that gets you to do the bidding of the thinker of that idea?

And you do something that you believe is good

and righteous and just and wonderful

and it's gonna help society,

but it's all part of a much more sophisticated thought

that you look at it after the fact and you go,

oh, crap, I thought I was doing something good

and look how it's been perverted into something

very, very bad.

And so, man, we could talk for days about

who is the thinker of the ideas that you adopt?

And what ideas might be accepted,

but then the idea follows right behind it

and says, oh, that's gonna be too hard.

You're gonna face too much resistance.

You can't do that.

Nobody's gonna wanna do that.

People like the comfort of the current system.

When you ask yourself with every single idea

that you recognize that you are thinking

that is in your space of consciousness,

is that my idea or did it come from somewhere?

Is there a realm, like we know about cell phones,

you know that there's some kind of energy

that comes out of here and some other cell phone

can tune into it.

People know you can tune a radio or tune a television

or whatever, you get into the frequency

and I've had that experience with loved ones

where you know what they're thinking before they say it.

I've had numerous experiences with friends and stuff

where I've said something and their response was,

oh, my God, I was thinking the same thing, okay?

Well, was that just coincidence?

Or is thought something that, you know,

neural link can tap into and control?

You know, do we wanna let companies put sensors

in our brains or in our bloodstream

and tap into our thoughts and put thoughts into our minds?

Do we wanna allow that to happen?

Or do we wanna realize that we can have better more,

I'll take that back.

We can choose to focus on better, more creative,

more fair universal just ideas to build a better system

that when you build the better mouse trap,

when you build the better system, you know,

if you could build a better currency, okay?

That people trust more than they trust the dollar

or the pound or Bitcoin or whatever.

People will flock to it.

So what we need are people that have better ideas,

creative ideas, where those ideas come from,

you have to be careful because any good idea

can be used for bad, but whether it's, you know,

new ideas of how to educate children.

Do you wanna continue to teach people from, you know,

young age, young children to be slaves in a system

where they go to school for 12 plus years

to just be bludgeoned in submission

and only the ones who submit and obey and follow the rules

and become good slaves for the corporation or government.

Is that what we wanna continue to do to our children?

There are systems out there where people are educating children

in a very different way and you come out

with a very different adult.

You come out with somebody who's creative and self-sufficient

and is not preyed upon by the systems

that they've been programmed to obey.

And so whether it's education or religion

or communications or transportation or whatever,

are we headed towards a Mad Max, you know, 1984

dystopian society?

Are we headed for, you know, a Star Trek future

where, you know, money is the thing of the past

and people have their needs.

And so they live their lives with a creative purpose

as the main focus rather than just survival and competition.

Do we wanna cooperate rather than compete all the time?

And do we, you know, people don't even understand

the darn meaning of the word capitalism.

Capital is the means of production.

You know, do you want someone else to own

all of the means of production

so you have to work in their factory or their sweatshop

or their, you know, building software using AI,

working for somebody else to profit from it?

Or, you know, do we need a different system?

Anybody who is pro-capital is anti-human.

And I'm not, I'm not an advocate for communism

or socialism or fascism or any of the isms.

We need new ideas to have a new system

that maybe hasn't been defined yet

so it doesn't have a name.

And if anybody wants to talk about that, boy,

that would be spectacular.

James.

Got your speech at the end for a moment.

No, don't play devil's advocate.

I refuse to advocate for the devil.

You can take the other side of the discussion

and challenge my ideas, but don't advocate for that guy.

I don't support that.

You're suggesting that new ideas is what are,

or what are what are needed is what is needed.

New, hold on.

What is the correct language?

What is new ideas?

We need, we need some new ideas about that.

Yes, okay.

You're suggesting we need some new ideas.

Could it also be argued that some old ideas are great

and also could be re-adopted?

I think of, for example, my grandparents.

They had wisdom that I don't think I have.

And perhaps their grandparents had wisdom that was lost.

And so on.

I will certainly go down that path and agree

that there are many ideas that have been lost

and need to be re-recognized, I guess.

One of them I can turn and go outside in my yard.

I've spoken of this maybe not with you,

but with other people numerous times.

I live in the Los Angeles area.

We have a very small, not a tiny home,

but very small home, it's only about 1,000 square feet.

Our yard is only about 1,000 square feet.

That's pretty small for a yard, okay?

I think I have 16 or 17 fruit trees

that grow in my little yard.

It's a jungle, okay?

All of the greenery that grows beneath those trees

are what most people would call edible weeds.

Things like stinging metal and malo and dock and dandelion

and nestersum and lambs quarters

and people who are into gardening and foraging will understand.

Most people would pull those out of their yard

and treat them as weeds, but they're edible.

So every day I go out into the yard

and either pick some fruit or some vegetation, make salad.

I'm not saying you need to be vegan,

maybe that's the ultimate.

I don't have chickens, I don't have other animals

who don't have space for any of that.

But that's old school.

That's garden of eat, I got a little garden of eatin' stuff.

Why in the world would you hire a gardener

to mow your grass every day, like my neighbors,

every week, like my neighbors do,

to just throw all of that greenery away,

put whatever weeds and stuff you have in the compost pile

and make food for your food, okay?

Well, that's an old idea.

And I think the trigger that started me down that path

was I watched a video a couple of decades ago

of a father whose child came home

with a handful of sunflower seeds.

And the project was to grow some sunflowers.

Well, if you've ever grown sunflowers,

you plant a couple of seeds, you've got a couple of sunflowers,

you've got a couple of thousand seeds.

And so when you work with mother nature,

you know, the plants that grow in my yard,

I don't want to overstate it.

Certainly hundreds of thousands,

probably millions of seeds.

So I don't need to buy seeds,

mother nature provides.

So that's, you know, a simple old idea,

you know, frugality is an old idea.

Waste not, want not, okay?

One of the things that I've done as, you know,

one of the many things I've done in my life

is during COVID when everybody started

leaving Los Angeles,

people would leave beautiful antique furniture

on the side of the road as trash

because they had to fit it into a truck to leave.

So we spent a couple of years just, you know,

picking up old furniture,

polishing it up, fixing it up,

I have those carpentry skills

and reselling it as better than you could possibly buy

in any store.

They don't make them like they used to.

They can't buy good furniture

because you can't afford to now, right?

And so those are just two, you know,

there are ideas with mesh networks

for communications where the device that you have

connects to the next closest device

and the communication travels, you know,

through the network of all the people

who have the devices,

it's not controlled by a single solitary point.

So you're not dependent on a phone company.

That can shut you down, okay?

There are spectacular ideas out there in the world.

And, you know, I want to spend the rest of my days focusing on

how do we make this world a better place?

We can certainly point out what's wrong

and what's broken and what needs to be replaced.

But if we put our energy into what is it that we want,

we can, if we will,

and we must make the world a better place.

But that's on us.

It's not going to happen.

It's not going to happen.

And the people who are part of the beast system right now,

if they were to make it happen,

they would just plug it into the beast

and use it to control us even more.

We have to do it independently in a creative way

that is separate and is not controlled

by any one organization, any one person,

but is, you know, open for everybody's use.

So, more decentralization.

As a general rule, probably, you know,

there's every system you have to analyze, you know, uniquely.

But when you centralize power,

you generally give up freedom.

And so, if the decision-making is closer to the source,

if you get to decide, you know,

when you wake up in the morning,

and you do that day,

as opposed to going to work

and doing what someone else tells you to do,

you can see it immediately,

you're going to be happier.

Now, you still have to work.

You still have to choose.

You still have to put in the effort.

It's not a free ride.

But I think you could look at almost any study

that's out there that people who feel that they have control

over their day-to-day decision-making

are far happier than slaves.

And so, we're slaves.

Most people are slaves in the way

that they don't recognize the prison.

They don't recognize that the job

or the belief structure

or the educational system that they're part of

actually controls them.

And, you know, we should...

There are people who are just out of control.

And, you know, part of the problem is to give freedom

with the understanding that there will be people

who abuse that freedom.

And we have to have systems in place

to stop the abuse of that freedom.

But what we have in place now is a system

that causes people to want to rebel

because it's so constrictive.

You can't keep people in cage for very long.

You know, some of them will rebel.

And it's one thing when people rebel

against the warden of the prison that they're in

because they're not supposed to be in that prison.

It's another thing to have a prison

where people are dangerous

and they have intent to harm others

and we need to come together

and control their violent nature.

That's a difficult decision.

Finland has probably done a better job

than most countries.

I'm not an expert on their systems,

but they treat, you know,

quote unquote, criminal activity in a different way.

It's a bigger problem,

and I can point to something like the prep act

here in the United States,

is we've made criminal activity legal

by passing laws that allow corporations

and people to get literally,

to literally get away with murder, right?

I mean, corporations and stuff

that did harm throughout COVID

are protected from any kind of criminal civil lawsuit

because the prep act says you can't touch them.

The law has been corrupted

to protect criminals.

That's a system, you know,

in the United States,

I don't know how many,

probably hundreds of millions of words

make up the code of federal regulations

just on the federal level.

No human being can comprehend that many rules.

I mean, Moses came down with 10 rules

and those were flawed.

And that's a whole other discussion.

I'll just leave it there.

People want to have that discussion.

The more laws you have,

the more control you have.

What you need are agreements amongst people

to live together.

It's a social contract.

It's a new social contract

that we need to agree to.

I didn't agree to the Constitution, okay?

People in the UK didn't agree to the Magna Carta.

They weren't around hundreds,

almost a thousand years ago.

Whatever Constitution that you have in your country,

maybe in South Africa it's relatively modern.

Maybe you were, you know,

of age at the time and you agreed to it.

But you didn't.

It was agreed on your behalf.

And maybe you agreed to it

and maybe it's working and maybe it isn't.

But the issue really is,

if we don't make a new system

that functions better

so that people gravitate to it.

They want to use the money.

They want to use that system of transportation.

They want to use that system of communication.

They want to put their children through that system of education.

They want that better idea.

If we don't build it,

then we're going to be stuck in the beast system

that currently exists.

But if we do build and implement better ideas,

people will gravitate to it

and all of the stuff that we're concerned about now

will just wither and die on the vine

because we stop feeding the beast.

Every time you pay a subscription

or whatever to some corporate Netflix

or Hulu or whatever it might be,

you're feeding the beast of propaganda.

Stop it.

Every time you utilize a credit card,

you're feeding the beast of whoever's profiting

from your purchase.

Stop doing it.

Well, it's easier to stop something

when you have a better something to go to.

And unfortunately, the new systems

are being built by the people who control the old system.

And we need to not let that happen

because it's only going to be a tighter news around our next.

About who creates the new social contract?

Who enforces it?

And what about those who don't want to be part of it?

That's all part of it.

Live your life the way you want.

He who creates is the one who is supposed to control.

And so none of us,

we did not create our systems of government.

We did not create,

the vast majority of people,

did not create the corporate structure,

the corporate hierarchy.

These are new ideas

that are not in the, you know,

public awareness at the moment.

They need to be.

And so, you know, I'll give my phone number again.

310-619-3055.

You can find all my work on JamesRuguski.substack.com.

Reach out to me if you want to work towards a better future.

I'm not saying it's going to be easy.

But it's looking like if we don't do it,

it's going to get really very, very difficult.

And the system that is currently in place

is growing exponentially.

It's already entrapped to vast majority of humanity.

But there's still a better way.

There's still a way to build a better future.

And we need new ideas.

And those will come from sources

who are not currently in power.

They will come from regular people

who accept a thought

from wherever thoughts come from,

accept a new idea.

If you share it and it's a good idea

and you can turn it into a functional reality,

if it truly is a good idea,

that people will join in.

You can't make them.

But if you have a better idea,

people will gravitate to it.

How can my audience follow you?

I've got about two dozen websites.

So a new socialcontact.com is one of them.

But I think that what we need more than anything

is for people, don't follow me.

Connect with me.

It's not leader and follower.

It's connection.

So everybody already has my phone number.

310-619-3055.

Send me a text message.

If you're not in the US,

use signal or telegram or WhatsApp.

It's all the same phone number.

You can find me that way.

Let's connect and communicate.

It's not followed the leader.

It's come together as equals

and discuss ideas

and choose the ones that we think

are feasible and go forward

into a better and brighter future.

James Rogowski.

Thank you for joining me in the trenches.

How to have fun anytime, anywhere.

Step one, go to chumbacaceno.com.

Chumbacaceno.com. Got it.

Step two, collect your welcome bonus.

Come to Papa, welcome bonus.

Step three, play hundreds of casino-style games for free.

That's a lot of games, all for free.

Step four, unleash your excitement.

Chumbacaceno has been delivering thrills for over a decade.

So claim your free welcome bonus now and live the Chumbaclife.

Visit chumbacaceno.com.