
newsOct 25, 202329:54pending
But, Maybe, Logic Games Were… Good?
About this episode
LSAT's decision is not totally... illogical.
-----------
The LSAT is ditching logic games from upcoming tests and the Above the Law gang is conflicted over whether or not that's a good thing. There's a good argument that the section disproportionately disadvantaged folks with vision issues. On the other hand that was a deficiency that admissions could address on the back end, but without that score schools no longer have a pattern recognition evaluation -- and what's more "thinking like a lawyer" than pattern recognition? We also discuss NYU Law Review getting sued by Stephen Miller and a lawyer citing Hitler approvingly.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer

The ILTACON Wrap-Up
Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer
Sep 3, 202638:32completed

A Tribute, A Tactic, Or An Appellate Issue?
Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer
Aug 26, 202626:35pending

Luigi's Double Jeopardy Gamble And The DOJ's Complicity
Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer
Aug 19, 202632:25pending

Biglaw Surrenders Were Worse Than We Thought
Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer
Aug 12, 202631:25pending