Col. Jacques Baud: What a US Ground Invasion of Iran Would REALLY Look Like

Expert analysis on US-Iran tensions: Examines military feasibility of invading Iran—mountainous terrain, missile/drone superiority, and logistical hurdles make occupation extremely difficult. Tactical strikes achieve limited gains but no strategic impact, while Iran consolidates strength with potential Russian/Chinese support. Discusses nuclear concerns: Israel's unchecked arsenal versus Iran's potential NPT withdrawal. Highlights legal risks for nations hosting US bases under UN Resolution 3314—allowing attacks from your territory makes you an aggressor; cites Spain's refusal to enable strikes. Critiques Western sanctions as counterproductive, raising energy costs without improving security. Argues diplomacy, not escalation, is the only path to regional stability and securing the Strait of Hormuz. Warns prolonged conflict erodes US influence while Iran gains strategic leverage and regional credibility.

---

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.