Data Centers vs. Small Towns: A Bipartisan Beef

On May 1st, in the tiny Texas town of Krow, home to about 800 folks surrounded by farms

and fields, a massive data center is turning.

Night into day with its constant bright glow.

Residents are snapping photos of this eerie white light piercing the dark skies where

stars used to shine clear.

This hyperscale facility, part of the AI boom sweeping rural America, promises big changes

but is already sparking major backlash.

These multi-billion dollar projects, like the expected $40 billion one in Krow, are popping

up nationwide to handle exploding AI demands.

They guzzle huge amounts of energy, water, and land, while local leaders push them for

jobs, tax money, and construction gigs.

But the rollout feels secretive, with odd project names hiding what they really are.

People across the political spectrum are uniting against them, from Democrats to Republicans

packing town halls and sharing tips on social media.

Folks worry about skyrocketing power bills, dropping home values, noise pollution, and

drying of resources needed for farming and clean water.

Its bridging divides, in places like Michigan, New Jersey, and Virginia.

Recent polls show strong opposition, with about 70% in Wisconsin, saying the downsides

outweigh any gains, cutting through usual partisan lines.

These even jumping in, calling it the most bipartisan beef since cheap beer.

Pushback is spreading to over 13 states, though some efforts stall at the governor level.

This unusual alliance against data centers, highlights how AI's hidden costs are reshaping

small towns and forcing everyone to rethink progress.

Keep watching, as these battles heat up across the heartland.