Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
societyOct 16, 202419:21pending

Do AI As Science Instead

Fluidity

About this episode

Few AI experiments constitute meaningful tests of hypotheses. As a branch of machine learning research, AI science has concentrated on black box investigation of training time phenomena. The best of this work is has been scientifically excellent. However, the hypotheses tested are mainly irrelevant to user and societal concerns.

https://betterwithout.ai/AI-as-science

This chapter references Chapman's essay, "How should we evaluate progress in AI?" https://metarationality.com/artificial-intelligence-progress

"Troubling Trends in Machine Learning Scholarship", Zachary C. Lipton and Jacob Steinhardt: https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.03341

You can support the podcast and get episodes a week early, by supporting the Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/m/fluidityaudiobooks
 
If you like the show, consider buying me a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/mattarnold
 
Original music by Kevin MacLeod.
 
This podcast is under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial International 4.0 License.

Get every episode summarized

Each time Fluidity publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

Do AI As Science Instead

Fluidity

0:00
19:21

More episodes

More from Fluidity

View all episodes →