Does nature really obey laws? A dialogue with Rupert Sheldrake
About this episode
The conviction that the natural world is obedient, adhering to laws, is a widespread assumption of modern science. But where did this idea originate and what beliefs does it imply?
In this episode of the Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogues, Rupert Sheldrake and Mark Vernon discuss the impact on science of the Elizabethan lawyer, Francis Bacon.
His New Instrument of Thought, or Novum Organum, published in 1620, put laws at the centre of science and was intended as an upgrade on assumptions developed by Aristotle.
But does the existence of mind-like laws of nature, somehow acting on otherwise mindless matter, even make sense? What difference is made by insights subsequent to Baconian philosophy, such as the discovery of evolution or the sense that the natural world is not machine-like but behaves like an organism? Could the laws of nature be more like habits? And what about the purposes of organisms, and creativity?
Get every episode summarized
Each time Inner Life, Talks and Thoughts publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Inner Life, Talks and Thoughts
The Souls of Plants. A conversation with Rupert Sheldrake
Inner Life, Talks and Thoughts
Homer's Odyssey, Nolan's telling. Crucial losses in the movie version of nostos,...
Inner Life, Talks and Thoughts
nd the Sacred Today. A dialogue between Rupert Sheldrake & Mark Vernon
Inner Life, Talks and Thoughts
The Awakening to Eternal Life! How to read William Blake's "Jerusalem the Emanat...
Inner Life, Talks and Thoughts