Loading...
Loading...
![]()
Donald Trump promised no wars under his watch.
Why on earth is this anti-war president doing what he's doing in Iran?
What is it about Iran that he's attacking?
That's what we're going to talk about in this video.
Like, comment, and subscribe.
Sign up for my free newsletter and links to the guests in the description below.
Hey, Roxanne, thank you so much for making yourself available.
Thank you for having me.
You are so welcome once again.
We did this fabulous conversation about Operation Gladio that kind of blew my mind
about the depth of it.
And one of the things you said to me before we started recording that video was that
how Iran is caught up in it as well in some way.
Now, I just want to say you are Colonel Tanner Watkins.
Right, and you did a lot of studying into Operation Gladio.
Yes.
But like, I mean, when we recorded that original video which I do recommend people go
and watch, I think it could have gone on for 12 hours.
We could have gone into all sorts of directions and...
Easy.
Yeah, without you needing to pause for breath.
I might need to stop you and say, look, whoa, whoa, hold on, hold on.
Let me keep up.
Okay, so I supported Donald Trump because in this first term,
he didn't start any new wars.
He did very small short kinetic actions.
And then about a week ago, we're recording this now on Saturday,
the 7th of March, on Friday, the 1st of March, I think it was on the 3rd,
the 28th of January, he started bombing Iran.
And he's still bombing Iran as far as I can tell.
It's difficult to tell with all these news and everything, right?
This makes no sense.
Dropping bombs on innocent people.
And then the Iranians are dropping bombs on Israel and other places apparently.
And I don't know whether Israel's dropping bombs on other places
or the U.S. is, it's the fog of war, but what the mess?
This isn't like a clean operation like Maduro to extract Maduro.
Why is that?
Do you know why that is?
No, so if you look at Venezuela and let's just talk about that one in a little detail.
So when the Chavez revolution happened in 1998 and he kicked out the CIA,
he kicked out all of these nefarious players.
There was almost an immediate in the early 2000, 2002 timeframe,
then again in 2004, attempt to overthrow his government.
Okay, so that tells me just from my gladiobat ground that he was not playing in the global order.
Right?
So you fast forward to Maduro's government in 2019, during the Trump administration,
Pompeo and Bolton orchestrated a coup against Maduro and they temporarily recognized Guido as the...
Yeah, okay, so...
I know that it was very funny.
Yes, it was except that during that interim period of time when the U.S. financial markets
was recognizing Guido, he basically collectively took Sitco in the United States and billions of
dollars from the Venezuela government as a part of that. It's a gas station.
Right, okay.
Yeah, so...
And there's lots of details there, but just at the 30,000 foot look,
Maduro obviously stayed in power.
So if you need to take Maduro off the chess board and you have people that are in that administration
that's willing to work with the U.S. government in doing that, you diffuse
whether you want to say it's right or wrong, you diffuse the use of Venezuela as kind of
this straw man. Because what happens is this gladio operation goes because of the cocaine
in Latin America, they were using Venezuela as a boogie man. So no matter any CIA person,
media person, they all focused on Venezuela because they didn't control it.
As being the boogie man, right? All the drugs are coming from Venezuela. There's a book here
that I'm just finished reading called stolen elections. It's written in large part by a CIA guy.
He not only blamed all of the stolen elections in the United States and election interference
on Venezuela, but they literally say in that book that Maduro is running the largest drug
empire in the world. I just told you who was doing it. It's the CIA, not Maduro, but by taking
Maduro off the chess board and you see him waving to everybody like he's going to club met as
opposed to going to jail. And you have an infrastructure inside of Venezuela that you basically took
that excuse off the board. They can't say it's Venezuela anymore. And what happens in the immediate
aftermath? Today, they're hosting that large coalition of Latin American countries that
and South American countries that are dead set on getting rid of the narco trafficking
in the Western hemisphere. So it allows you to go to step three and four and five without having
this entity here that is the perpetual boogie man. So if you move to the Middle East and Iran,
who's the boogie man in the Middle East? I ran literally everything. So no, no, I'm talking about
of the the Muslim countries over there, right? From America, Iran is blamed for everything.
Hezbollah, ISIS, everything. Well, I told you, ISIS, I can get Hezbollah in Hamas. I don't get
I'm sorry, Hamas, not ISIS. But even then, if you go back and look at the original funding for
Hamas, it was Israel that funded Hamas against the PLO. It was not Iran. I'm talking about the narrative,
not necessarily the reality, right? So we have been conditioned with propaganda to believe
that, and especially in America, Israel can do no wrong, and Iran can do no right. Those are the
paradigms here. That's the message. But again, I just told you that Masad was helping train the
Sabah in Iran. They helped create the monster. No, okay, no, you didn't in this video. That was the
other video where you said, yeah, the CIA, the CIA helps. I don't, General Normandy will help
senior. Yeah, in my six CIA and a few years later, Masad began helping train the Sabah
agents that were torturing people, kidnapping people, tracking people down, all of that stuff.
They were all involved in Iran. And for people who don't know, Sabah was the intelligent service
under the Shah of Iran. Very, very true. Yes, okay. So you set the conditions for this,
what I would consider an evil empire under the Shah. You have a revolution. Now, as I have said
often in other videos, anytime, and it was true in Iraq as well. Saddam Hussein had an account
at the bank we talked about in the previous video, BCI. He's part of this whole CIA apparatus.
He's controllable. He was also installed against the sovereignist leader before him. Yes,
okay. That's the paradigm. So the CIA is very good at planning successors, right? So
if the guy gets off like Norey Egan and Panama, he was on the CIA payroll too. But
often times these, because they're corrupt, that's why they're there. Sometimes they get a little
too big for their riches and we have to do away with them. Okay, and we have, so they're always
grooming the next guy. Saddam Hussein found out that his minister of defense, whose name I
can't remember off the top of my head, was the next guy being groomed and he killed him.
So you're working with very corrupt people, all right? And from the Iran perspective,
I found it very rich after understanding gladio and the real control that governments have of
whose residing in their countries, that the Ayatollah was plucked out of France, a member of
NATO, part of Operation Gladio, and stuck into Iran during their revolution.
Now, I remember him flying in from Paris. Yes. But in fact, it was before I was born, but I still
remember it. And he lived in France for 15 years or something like that. And that was just
out of the compassion of this Western democracy, taking care of this political,
asylum seeker, refugee. It was very good to the French people to look after him like that.
Yes. And then he just mysteriously shows up in the middle of this revolution. And you're, you know,
so there's a lot more research that needs to be done on that aspect of it, but you basically
have the perpetuation. I was shocked when I started looking into the amount of trade that France
did with the Ayatollah and that the UK did with the Ayatollah and that Germany did with the Ayatollah.
And as I mentioned to you in the other video, in 1980s during the Iran Iraq war, who was selling
Iran missiles, we were twice at least large shipments. And do you know who we brokered those missiles
through? Israel. To know that. Yes. The Iran Contra scandal and Oliver North.
Those missiles translated Israel.
US Western missiles. Okay. So they, okay, they went from the US to Israel to to arm Iran.
Yes. And the CIA, possibly with, well, with Mossad and maybe MI6 involvement.
Tracking the whole thing done with the, one days I expect with certain aspects of the US
government. Yes. Because of the North Parkment. Right. They involved in Reagan's government at the
time. Yes. Okay. So if you understand that history of Iran, Iran was given the same option
as, um, Venezuela was given. Stop it. Stop it. Don't do this anymore.
I, Ayatollah, go, go back to France. Go live somewhere else. And, okay, but what, what, what was,
what was Iran doing still? That they said this, were they still dealing in drugs or something?
No, no. They are, um, I think what happens is, um, the negotiating team goes to, and says,
you, you have, and they, they, they did fund, um, Hezbollah. Um, and you've done some not good things.
And we want all of that to stop. Okay. And, sorry, go ahead. And Iran can say, okay, we're going to stop
because I believe the peace president, as you describe him, Trump, wants all of this shit to stop
because it's destabilizing everything. You can't have true peace in the Middle East with the threat
of Iran, um, continuing weapons grade uranium enrichment and it always being on the table.
So regardless of it's not happening in five days and all that other crap, that's all garbage.
But Iran could have come to the peace table and sat at the adult table. They decided to come to
the table and sit at the kids table. They were not going to, um, participate in this, um,
peace coalition. They just weren't going to do it. Okay. But here's why because they've got
legitimate reasons not to, because they're supporting Hezbollah, which are this legitimate
resistance group in order to protect the Lebanese people from the, uh, colonialism from this,
um, this, this, this military base that the British have deposited in Palestine in order to
shitster that goes out killing innocent Lebanese people and Hezbollah, we're not going to put
up with this anymore. We're going to fight in self-defense. So I, I understand that part and I
find that fascinating because I can't argue that point and I'll tell you why. When, when I first
started this research, I had been brainwashed in that Sheikh Haberah was this awful person. He helped
the revolution in, um, uh, Cuba and he kept showing up at all these really, um, inconvenient for
the CIA places throughout Latin America helping the indigenous people fight against the colonial
powers or the overthrow of the legitimate governments. He showed up in every one of them. And
I realized that the propaganda that circulated around Sheikh Haberah was, he was a pain in the
ass to the CIA. It was a freedom fighter. He wanted indigenous people to be able to rule their
own lives. Yes. But the propaganda in America was, he's this gorilla that is basically, you know,
communist. They love putting that label on everybody. And that he's the destabilization force when
it was actually the exact opposite. Right. So an equivalent in Britain might be it's a bit dated.
But not as dated as your example. The ANC in South Africa were terrorists, uh, by, according to
the mainstream media in the British government, but also by those who anti-apartheid, anti-apartheid
people were like, will their freedom fighters struggling for liberty from this racist state?
So there's two sides to that argument, right? So send you with Esbalah's two sides, right?
Correct. So again, um, there are other ways to deal with Lebanon, um,
and I believe that's what all of these chess moves are all about. So the, but back to Iran,
proper, I think that there was, um, I don't even know how to say this because this is all speculation
on my part. Obviously, we don't know this. I imagine that there's a threat in the Middle East.
And I imagine that threat to be the potential of a false flag.
And just like, I think that's what Venezuela was being set up to be used for in the western hemisphere.
The potential of some type of nuclear, whether it's a tactical nuclear weapon or a dirty bomb,
which we've already known, Ukraine had at least three opportunities to use that against Russia.
It's been reported by not mainstream, but reliable sources that, that was there,
and they were going to blame, I ran for it. And it most likely would have been against Israel.
And so I think there's conversations that were had that we want all of this to go away.
Okay. And whatever reason I ran decided they were not going to be part of the solution.
And then lob some bombs and just kind of as an explanation point, no, we're not playing with this.
And I think that's what evolved into what we're seeing today.
Because in order to make this whole thing work, you have to have adults at the table
that recognize the real source of destabilization is these errant regime change artists that go around
creating these false flags. What I find most interesting is the UK's response to all of this.
Okay, we'll come to that. That's very, very interesting, right? That was like, no, there's something
wrong about there. There's something else going on. So I imagine that there are WMDs in Iraq,
and therefore we have to go in before they launch missiles that can reach England in 45 minutes.
No, I imagined it. I imagined it, right? It sounds a bit like that. And I did say that I was going to
push back. No, I got something else off of you, Roxanne, right? I want to go to the trade that
you were talking about because you didn't mention something else. I interviewed Barbara Boyd last night
from, it's not out yet. There's a recordedness on set in the seventh of March from Promethean Action.
One thing she told me was about, that's right, you make a note so that you watch that video and
subscribe, comment, and like watching, okay? When it comes out, and everybody else is growing, right?
So Barbara Boyd from Promethean Action, they do really, really great work. She said,
so one, the Iranian regime was born out of the Muslim Brotherhood,
and the Muslim Brotherhood was a creation of the British in order to get stir, because that's
what the British do. They like to shits there and keep everybody divided and fighting amongst
each other so they can't unite against their imperial overlords. Correct. And that
Mike Steiger, also for Promethean Action, in the short video he posted last night said that
he said that the Ayatollah Khomeini's sister said, if you look under Ayatollah Khomeini, the
first one, if you look under his bed, you will find the British flag. Oh, that's interesting.
And then Barbara Boyd referred to this book called Hostage to Khomeini, which is out of print,
but you can find it on internet archive and download it, which gives documented, documented
evidence, like independent verifiable evidence, money trails, that show how his Khomeini's connections
to the CIA and MI6. And I'm referring to what you said earlier, how these intelligence agencies,
okay, this puppet is no good. We got the next one lined up. And what Khomeini did, because Barbara
was saying this, that the Shah towards the end of, why they're one of the reasons they wanted to
get rid of him is he wanted to industrialize Iran and have nuclear power and then promote
that model to the rest of the world. Well, the last thing the European elites want are strong
nations in the rest of the world with their own independent industrial economies. So he had to go
and then they were, okay, well, we'll put in this Islamist Khomeini, who will keep the country
primitive and feudal in the same way that the Taliban have done with Afghanistan, which before
they came to power was a civil society. You know, women went around in skirts and everything,
and there was rock and roll music or whatever, right? People were free and it was, there was still
Muslim, but like it's sort of Turkish Muslim. So then the Iran under the ito Khomeini has kept
the country's development suppressed by serving the interests of the British elites or the European
elites. And then you talked about the trade ties between Britain, Africa, Germany and France.
And I heard you mention on a video, I wasn't able to listen to it in full crypto AG. Now I started
off as crypto rich. So I thought you were talking about some some cryptocurrency going on between
Iran and Britain, right? What was crypto AG? So take it there, because that's not something I heard,
I've heard anything about. No one talks about it, because it's CIA. Talk about it.
So go back to World War II. Crypto AG was used during World War II. The guy was originally Swedish.
He set up a company. He comes to work with the NSA during World War II. All of that stuff
happens. It's a cryptology equipment that allows you to communicate so no one else can, you know,
tap into your communications. So after World War II, the CIA helps him set up a company in Switzerland
because they're neutral, right? But the technology actually has a backdoor to it. And so as long as he's
there and he hires, it looks like a legitimate company, he hires salesman, they go all over the
world, 120 countries by this encryption device that allows them to communicate internal to their
country encrypted and to their embassies around the world. The CIA had a backdoor the entire time.
So if you think about this from 1945 until 2020, when Donald Trump got rid of them.
Go over to the CIA or crypto AG. Crypto AG. Okay.
Oh, 120 countries. The CIA knew everything they were saying to each other the entire time. So all
of these surprise things were never a surprise. So as this guy gets older, he has a son that works
at his company, but they did it trust his son. So they arranged with this old man that he's going
to sell his company to this entity that is a CIA proprietary, but it looks legitimate. It has an
office. It has a staff, but they're just on the payroll. And this crypto AG company maintains
this arrangement, but the German BND decides to go in. That's ran by Reinhard Gaelin, the guy that
set up the state behind units for Hitler. Okay. German BND, the German intelligence service,
the Germans intelligence service. Okay. So now the Germans have a backdoor and the CIA has a backdoor.
Now eventually that goes on for several years. Eventually the German BND, Gaelin's gone,
they decide they're out. So then it becomes again, just a CIA proprietary company.
What did they use the information for that they gave this way?
To ensure that they had situational awareness of everything that was going on in the world.
And I want to make sure everybody understands the implication of this. So the entire time the
CIA is saying that Guatemala had communist in them, they knew 100% Guatemala had never communicated
with Russia ever. The whole time that they're talking about this communist to the party in Iran,
they knew 100% it was less than 1% of the population at the time. It was never a threat.
The every single coup, Indonesia. So Indonesia, if you understand that the president of Indonesia is
communicating with other heads of state through these encrypted devices. And you know that
Sukarno is setting up this neutral neutrality pact with Libya and all of these other independent
countries. Do you know you've got to get rid of him? So you have global intelligence of everything
going on in the world by the backdoor to this crypto AG company. Wow. How do we get a cut of this
folks? I don't know. I know it's going for not in love. Okay, that would include the United States,
the UK, Australia, the European Union nations. Now interestingly enough because they have five
eyes, they spy on each other already. So I don't know that Australia ever had crypto AG,
but they don't need it because they share the intelligence already. They have access to it. They
have other systems, but these other countries I ran being one of them and I ran caught them doing
this. So there was an incident about 10 years after they had bought into crypto AG where Reagan said
something and I ran knew that they had not said anything. They continued to use it.
They held one of the salesmen hostage for a year and required a million dollar payment to release
him and crypto AG, the CIA, tried to make that employee pay the million dollars back.
That's how evil these people are. So it's just so important for us to understand how big this
operation is. So I want to go back to what you were saying about the British relationship. So
we have to understand that you remember when Trump took out Salamani? Yeah.
Wasn't that supposed to be a joint assassination with Israel? And don't you remember Trump saying at
the last minute that BB Netanyahu pulled out? Okay, I don't remember. Carry on, please.
Okay, so that happened. So to your point about the Iatola being very close friends to the British,
you also have a relationship with the Republican guard. The Republican guard in my estimation,
if you look at the remnants of what was left of the Savak, basically all the Republican guard did
was change the name of the outfit and kill a couple of the guys at the top. The apparatus was
left in place. Okay, so Savak evolved into the change in name became the IRGC. Basically,
okay, basically, right, right, right, right, right, okay. So if I tell you, yeah, this is Islamic
for so so if you have this arrangement with the Israel and the UK in this basically propping up
of Iran and I think you misunderstood when I was talking about the dirty bombs, I'm not suggesting
I ran was going to be the one doing it. Right. I'm suggesting that it would have been a gladio
operation where potentially if Israel was a target, it'd be Israel doing it. They've killed
their own people and blame Iran. Yes. So if you can't get Iran underneath the umbrella of the
peace movement, then you have to change Iran because we can't allow Iran to be continued to use
as the British and the Israel's boogie man anymore. Okay, but but the trouble make is Israel. They're
the one who could have done this false flag. They're the one that going and killing people in Gaza
and stealing. Do you think that if you I agree with you, but do you think if you said that to the
world population right now, they'd believe you. But before before this latest or so on Iran,
Trump couldn't write in Trump. Do that. No one's going to believe him in the United States.
No one is going to believe that Israel is the bad guy here. There has been hundreds of billions
of dollars in propaganda and psychological operations inside America that we're all going to die
if we don't support Israel. Isn't that changing because of the so the killing of all these
gazes and the Palestinians, the Gaza genocide? There's a faction, but the media and the CIA
basically marginalizes them as it's like the Vietnam war protesters. You know how the psychological
operations to marginalize them? That's exactly what's happening here with anyone that stands up for
Gaza. There is a collective psychological operation to immediately marginalize them. And I would go
so far as to say these campus supporting of the PLO and all of that stuff that was happening on
the campus here, none of that's organic. That was all done to marginalize the people that honestly
think there's a genocide going on in Gaza. And they did the exact same thing during Vietnam
with the American people. There was legitimate well-dressed college students that were protesting
and very articulate, making a valid argument why we had no business being in Vietnam at all.
It scared the shit out of the CIA because they were using that to set up the golden triangle,
right? And take over the European production in Laos and blah, blah, blah. Okay, so you can't have
those guys be effective. So what do we do? Well, they orchestrated, they created and funded the
National Student Association. Gloria Steinem was on the CIA payroll. If you go back and you look
at the hippie movement, the entire thing was orchestrated. The LSD experiments, give people drugs,
tune in, sign out, whatever that saying was, they completely infiltrated those movements to
delegitimize them. So now when you think about anti-war protesters for Vietnam, people immediately
say they were all hippies. They were not all hippies. There were a lot of very articulate, well-spoken
college students that were protesting the Vietnam War. But that's not what the after effect was.
That's what's happening in America today with the Gaza situation. So again, you go to Iran and
you say, look, this is the real deal. This is what's happening. And we need you to be part of this
coalition so that we can isolate the real bad guys, which is the leadership, not the Israeli people,
the leadership in Israel and the leadership in the UK. And we can expose this for what it really
is. And if those guys are still under the control of the UK and the government of Israel and they go,
no, we're not playing, then you don't have a choice but to take them out. As awful as that sounds.
Okay, do you mention the UK? And this strikes me. My cousins were wonderful, lovely cousins.
We have a lot of political conversations. Don't agree with them about Trump. And they're now
right that he wasn't anti-war. And I got it all wrong, right? But I've said to them and I've
said to other friends of mine, there's a really great threat by a guy by a British journalist
called Jody McIntyre. Jody, if you're watching, please ping me a DM on X. And I'd love to have you
on my channel about Kirstama's connections to Israel and to Zionist entities half the cabinet
on members of labor, friends of Israel. Last year during the 12-day war, the British government
was giving intelligence to Israel, supplying arms and went out with the US to bomb Yemen.
And it all might add up life. Every American misadventure in the Middle East, the British have
been there right from the get-go. Let's bomb Libya. We'll do it together. Let's bomb Syria. We're
together. Iraq, Afghanistan. Let's do it together. We got a special relationship. We go around
killing other people together, like there's buddies, buddies dropping bombs. But not here.
That doesn't make sense because it would make good colonial sense for the British to be involved
and then get their share, their cut of the Iranian oil wealth. Unless if this was a traditional,
you know, the way Iraq was or Libya was, right? But they're not doing that.
No, nothing traditional about this at all. Now let me add another thing to your labor party,
comment, and Zionism. So this whole journey took me back to the late 1800s in the Fabian Society,
which gave birth to the labor party. Yes, I don't agree with that with my Eric.
So if you understand the Fabian Society and their one-world government,
mantra, and everything downhill from that Cecil Rhodes, oh, and the creation of Israel
has a strategy of tension in the Middle East to control everything there. It all Zionism,
who created Zionism? I mean, it was the birth point. Yes. So all of this flows up,
heal upstream to Britain, literally upstream to Britain. So they created thanks to Cecil Rhodes
diary. They created the Chatham House, the CFR, the Pilgrim Society on both sides of the pond.
So these have been controlling mechanisms all the way down through time.
Donald Trump is not part of that infrastructure. British still are.
And so they are not going to play well in the sandbox of peace because their entire empire
is built on the strategy of tension where they can play all these players against each other.
And I believe, so if you look post-World War II, we talked about in our first show, Pakistan.
That was a whole creation out of World War II. Yeah. The British have done that everywhere.
Spitting up people, Island, Northern Island, North Cyprus, South Cyprus, everywhere they go.
Yes. So you have Taiwan created after World War II, Israel created after World War II.
So if you want war on demand, you set up these countries that and you draw really weird lines.
Look at the Kurdish in Turkey, sense of contention in Turkey, the Kurdish in Iran, the Kurdish in Iraq
and the Kurdish in Syria. You can destabilize four countries with one body. Yeah.
And that's the way all of the post-World War II maps were drawn and they actually coined the phrase
strategy of tension. If I can create a strategy of tension anywhere on a moment's notice,
I've got instant warfare anytime I want to manipulate the global order and they create the
stay behind units to orchestrate their terrorism that then further illustrates. They destabilize those
tension lines that they purposely created. Okay. So there may be more ties between Iran,
the Iranian, the IRGC and MI6 and CIA, maybe most of them we know about, as evidenced by the UK
governments' responses. Because one thing as a social worker, I've never actually seen child abuse
happen. Never seen it happen. What I see are pointers and strategies, red flags that point to it.
Yes. Back that Kirstaama advocates for peace in the Middle East and we need to have a
diplomatic solution because he's such a peacenick while at the same time sending money for
Slav to kill Slav on the steps of Ukraine. Yes. No. Something fishy going on. He don't care about
people. Well, he's even talked about sending British troops to Ukraine. Yeah. That'll work out.
East eye. Yeah. They're probably already there. Well, the MI6 and MI5 are definitely there.
Well, MI5 is domestic, I understand. I know. There is about as domestic as our FBI.
Well, FBI is domestic. No, they're not. There's FBI stations all over the world.
Well, I'm not going to talk to you anymore. You shut to my world too much, right?
There are FBI. As a matter of fact, we just opened a big one in New Zealand.
An FBI office in New Zealand. Yes. What the hell? I don't know.
Okay. Let me know in the comments below. Why on earth is there an FBI office in New Zealand?
I think it must be for the sheep and for the Manuka honey. Actually, if you guys understand,
let me just tell you the real reason why they're there. A lot of these shell corporations,
New Zealand had some very interesting financial
rules and regulations that encourage people to set up trust,
blind trust that no one could ever see who's the beneficiary of, and a lot of the oligarchs
that we've talked about that's involved in this entire operation all had entities in New Zealand.
And I believe 100% they're there to track all the money laundry.
So is the FBI? I suppose there's a fraction of it that is supportive of what Trump wants to do to
clean stuff up. Yes, the leadership currently. Are there still embeds in there that absolutely
hate Trump? Yes, there is. Yes, there's poor guardian readers.
Okay. Now, when you say about trusts, that's really really important because I know about,
known a bit about trusts and how the elite use them to hide their money and their funds and
everything away from scrutiny. Well, in Britain, there's a very simple free process
where you can use trusts. You just download the form, fill in four parts and you can use this
mechanism to legally, lawfully, peacefully withhold your taxes as a protest against war or as a
protest against protest against anything that this damn government in Britain are doing.
Open borders, ignoring the plight, not investigating the rate gangs, the assisted dying bill,
which thank goodness has died of death, the additional IDs, the destruction of farming,
go to notaxforwar.com or upinarms.uk, download the transform, send it, don't send any money,
it's all explained and keep your money for yourself.
Roxanne, anything else? No, I think that's probably enough. I don't want to blow people's mind too much.
Not too much, not too much. I'm still going to walk around on these shifting sounds, right?
It's been an absolute delight and eye opener talking to you. Thank you so much. I look forward to
having you on again. Really, really appreciate it. Let us know in the comments, what do you want?
What do you want Roxanne to tell you about? If there was a particular bit that blew your mind,
give me a timestamp for that. Thank you very much for watching. This is Rich and Roxanne signing out.
All the best. Bye-bye. Bye.
Crypto Rich BTC on Odysee
Crypto Rich BTC on Odysee
Crypto Rich BTC on Odysee