Fireball Sightings SURGE Amid Drones INVADING US Military Bases, Rumors It's ALIENS

you are the most important relationship. Before you swipe, text, or worry about being too much,

start with you. Growth therapy helps you build self-worth, set boundaries, and show up as your

full self. Whether it's your first time in therapy or your 50th, grow makes it easier to find a

therapist who fits you, not the other way around. They connect you with thousands of independent

licensed therapists across the US, offering both virtual and in-person sessions, nights and weekends.

You can search by what matters like insurance, specialty identity, or availability, and get started

in as little as two days. And if something comes up, you can cancel up to 24 hours in advance at

no cost. There are no subscriptions, no long-term commitments. You just pay per session.

Growth helps you find therapy on your time. Whatever challenges you're facing,

growth therapy is here to help. Growth accepts over 100 insurance plans, including Medicaid in some

states, sessions average about $21 with insurance, and some pay is little as $0 depending on their

plan. Visit growthherapy.com slashbooknow to get started. That's growthherapy.com slashbooknow.

Growthherapy.com slashbooknow. Availability and coverage vary by state and insurance plan.

This podcast is supported by MIDI Health. Are you in midlife, feeling dismissed, unheard, or just

plain tired of the old healthcare system? You're not alone. For too long, women's serious midlife

health issues have been trivialized, ignored, and met with a just deal with it attitude.

Many of us have been made to feel ashamed or forgotten. In fact, even today, 75% of women seeking

care for menopause and perimenopause issues are left entirely untreated. But here's the powerful

truth. It's time for a change. It's time for MIDI. MIDI is not just a healthcare provider.

It's a woman's telehealth clinic founded and supported by world-class leaders in women's health.

What sets MIDI apart? We are the only women's telehealth brand covered by major insurance companies,

making high-quality expert care accessible and affordable. Our clinicians provide one-on-one

face-to-face consultations where they truly listen to your unique needs. We offer a full range

of holistic data-driven solutions from hormonal therapies and weight loss protocols to lifestyle

coaching and preventive health guidance. This isn't one-size-fits-all care. This is care

uniquely tailored for you. At MIDI, you will join our patients who feel seen, heard, and prioritized.

You will find that our mission is clear to help all women thrive in midlife,

giving them access to the healthcare they deserve. Because we believe midlife isn't the middle

at all, it is the beginning of your second act. Ready to feel your best and write your second

script? Visit joinmitty.com today to book your personalized insurance-covered virtual visit.

That's joinmitty.com, MIDI, the care women deserve.

Fireballs in the sky everywhere across the US. We are looking at what one person described as a

four and a half deviations above the mean of fireball sightings. At the same time, there have

been reports of drone incursions over air bases. With some reports saying they are military grade,

they are jam-resistant, something may be happening. Or nothing could just be commercial drones,

but the reports are that these are not commercial tagged. So what are they? Could it be that something

else is going on as this war expands? Honestly, we don't know for sure, but it's a crazy story,

because, of course, yesterday we talked about these Chinese individuals that were indicted for

planting a bomb at Central Command. We're also learning the US has deployed drone war boats

into the Strait of Hormuz. And we've got a crazy video that apparently shows, they claim it shows

anti-regime forces in Iran opening fire on the IRGC. Is this propaganda? Is it real? We don't know

for sure. But we'll talk about that in a bunch of other news, indeed, my friends. We have got a lot

to break down. And in less important news, of course, there's a viral video of a young Gen Z

influencer, you'll learn his name later, because I hate saying his name, but he's unloading a handgun

into an alligator in Florida and doing otherwise very illegal things. And now he's in jail. It's

glivicular, by the way. I know people are like, who cares? Well, I think this reflects upon social

media psychosis and how the younger generations are so desperate for attention, because they don't

know what else to do. They resort to doing math, sterilizing themselves, shooting animals,

and otherwise getting arrested. So we'll talk about all that. Before we do my friends,

we've got a great sponsor. It is tax network USA head over to TNUSA.com slash Tim,

Joe back taxes. Do you have unfiled tax returns? Did you retire? And suddenly,

get away with the tax bill you did not expect? Or maybe you're running a business and you've got

messy books. Whatever your tax issue is, the outcome is the same. Your balance is not going down.

Penalties are growing. Interest is compounding. And many of you are about to owe it again for the

upcoming tax year with no plan and site. So stop what you're doing and call tax network USA.

The IRS is not waiting. The IRS is enforcing collections through wage garnishments,

bank levies, and property seizures. They can even file for you without your consent. This is where

tax network USA comes in. With over 15 years in the business, there hasn't been a tax case they

haven't seen or resolved. They specialize in tax controversies and help taxpayers nationwide

get back on track by resolving those unfiled returns once and for all, whether you owe $10,000,

$10 million, their team has resolved over $1 billion in tax debt. And they can do the same for you,

but you got to call now. They're offering a free investigation with the IRS investigation call.

After that, they'll put a clear case plan in place to resolve your tax problem and get you back on

track. This is about using your legal rights to take control before the government sets the terms

for you. Do not wait for another IRS letter or frozen bank account. Call 866-686-1535. That is

866-686-1535 or go to tnusa.com slash Tim and also my friends pick up your cast brew coffee.

Look at the shameless. It's on sale 20% off bottle aluminum bottled, right? They told us there's

no plastic liner in these bottles. We're going to I want to verify that so we're doing some scientific

research to make sure that is case. But you got pool water available now at cast brew.com as well as

all of our favorites. You got the vault black. This is a cold brew concentrate, lightly sweetened.

Check it all out at cast brew.com. Don't forget my friends to smash that like button,

share the show with everyone you know joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more we

have Seth Kesel. All right. Thank you guys for having me on Tim. Appreciate the

invitation. Absolutely. Who are you? What do you do? I am sometimes referred to as America's

number two election denier. That's a recent review. Okay. Left for the book that I just had

published. But I've been in the election integrity space now for over five years since the 2020

election was actually still ongoing. Prior to that, I was an army military intelligence officer. I

left the service after six years at the rank of captain. I tend to see the world from a strategic

view. So I think it's kind of interesting that we are talking about drones being sighted over

US Air Force bases. I like to apply a strategic view to what's going on in the world. I have a long

term outlook on things. So I'm a little less susceptible to being downed by black pills online.

All right. On. We'll should be fun. Thanks for hanging out. Of course. Tonight's Ian

Phil Carter all hanging out. Ian looking like a crazy person intentionally as he does. I'm a

sire. All right. Let's jump into this first story. It's from space.com. We're not going right into

the heavy military stuff because first we got to address this story that's breaking today.

Fireball sightings are surging across the US. Here's what's really going on. These are missiles being

launched by China being intercepted or or as Kellen said, they're probes being deployed by three

eye atlas from the aliens seeking to come down and monitor us and our militaries intercepting them

or it could just be that people are paying attention because social media tells them to

and they're actually not seeing anything too crazy. It's just normal. But anyway, here's the actual

news. And the reason why I actually think it's important to talk about this is that many people do

believe something else is going on with reports of the UFO disclosures with aliens that gov being

registered. People are pointing out that we are seeing way more fireballs than normal.

Space.com says it's happening beyond the US beyond the US. Vancouver saw fireball on March 3rd,

France, Germany reporting sightings March 8th and 11th. Many fireballs lasted a long time

and we're seen across wide areas. They say there's definitely been a clustering of fireball

sightings. Quote, this is the question everybody wants answered. I think we're looking at slightly

elevated media activity, though still well within statistical expectations and increased awareness

and reporting, which happens whenever big events occur. So it sounds like what they're saying is

nothing to see here. Guys, it's just someone on social media said it was happening. Everybody

started looking up and seeing it happen. However, Owen Shroyer recently put out a video saying he saw

vehicles in the sky over Austin. One of them fell and burst into flames and the other two immediately

dispersed. People then immediately started to claim, no, no, he was just looking at contrails from

planes in the twilight of dusk, which makes no sense because that doesn't describe what he's

actually claiming he saw. With this, many people are questioning whether or not we're actually

looking at is sophisticated drone warfare, which we all know has been escalating over the past several

years. And with reports of these drone incursions and air force spaces could the question be,

we are intercepting drones or our drones are getting intercepted and they don't want to admit it.

Why would our drones begin intercepted over our airspace? Maybe there's an attack over our airspace

and they don't want to tell people. So you're saying that our drones are flying like US military drones

and somehow they're shooting them down like a Chinese drone or Iranian drone is in our air space

maybe and they're shooting our drone at the same time, but there's a there's a cloak. There's

combat and then well, maybe those drones that dispersed that owned us talking about was like,

oh, it's a good point. Conflict. It's like a drone. No, no, that's actually interesting.

Phil's laughing. I'm smiling. I'm not laughing. He's got this look on his face. He's like,

here goes Ian smiling. But actually, it's an interesting point. Oh, in short, I said he saw three

vehicles in the sky. One fell and burst into flames. They're the two dispersed. Yeah, what if

these were drones engaging with each other? Now, real quick, I just said this earlier. I mean,

it may actually be very, very simple. Oh, inshroyer saw some dude with drones and through imagine

you've got like, you know, a handful of young people flying drones around and then one crashes

and the other two just land. It's not a big deal. It doesn't mean it's aliens or military or whatever.

Because I think if you go up high enough, you're no longer in US airspace. Like how high up until

it's just space? No, you still are. You just keep going up up up up. I mean, what if you're out of

Earth's orbit? Is it still considered American airspace? At that point. At that point is America.

At some point, it's no longer the same with the ocean. You go out far enough. It's no longer

American. I think once you go outside of the atmosphere and you're in space, then it becomes,

you know, not sovereign territory. I mean, you might not actually have. So until we get more

information, I'm going to, I'm going to sell on the theories. I'm going to, I'm going to,

I'm going to sell on, I'm going to sell on some of these theories until we get a little bit

more information. Look, they're trying to say that these are flying at 40,000 miles an hour.

The standard missiles are going to fly at about 2500. I'm sure there's no drone on Earth. It's

going to be able to move at a speed like that. So we could be looking at a situation where

maybe we have more sophisticated ways to detect a cluster of meteors. Like we actually don't

have more earthquakes today than we ever did. But we think we do because now we can detect a 3.7

or a 4.2. So I'm a little bit bearish to jump right on it. I like a good conspiracy,

but this one seems like until I get more, I'm going to go with meteors. So you're saying aliens?

Well, you know, the cultural impact of this, this is going to definitely spawn some conspiracy

theories because we have a lot of those that are like there's been a movie and now there's an

event. So there was a Greenland 2. Greenland came out with Gerard Butler. So that might be one of

those. But, you know, the cultural impact of aliens, I think, is that Americans need to know the

best illegal alien we ever had was ET who learned English and then went home. Super.

I'm trying to get home the whole time. Yeah, he want to be here. Nope.

Now, Superman is an illegal immigrant, but, you know, who's going to stop him?

Was he naturalized? Super. I think I don't know for sure if it's canon, but I assume that they did

at some point. They registered him as their kid as if he was he was a cant. He had their name.

So they said, oh, look, wait a minute. Because back in the day, if you lived on a farm and

gave birth on that farm, that's how you did it. So Seth, you're saying because it seems to be

moving at 40,000 miles an hour, it's very unlikely it's a drone. Well, there's the official story,

which of course we've learned that we have to challenge official stories. This is NASA reporting

the speeds of these meteorite clusters at about 40,000 miles an hour. Most of them aren't landing

anywhere. I think they had one punched through a home in Houston, which was not far based on what

I read from where I used to live. There was there was the one in Ohio that was a sonic boom.

Everybody heard it and people saw a flash in the sky and they're like, what is it? Then they

came out and said, oh, it was a meteor. This is the one that was caught on the trail camera,

right? The green one smashed it down. No, I'm thinking of one that was caught on like a dairy farm

camera or something or a highway camera. Yeah, I think we're talking about one one. But there's

so many of them. They're being caught on camera. I think they do travel in clusters,

meteors, you know, one big one, they wake up into what's that? They're friends. Yeah, they love

each other, just like humans. They're community. They're on an adventure. Yeah, they're learning

together. Magnetic. So I'm not surprised to see a lot of them at once. You know, a lot of over

a course of like a couple months or a few weeks, we see a lot and then we don't see any for a

lifetime. I mean, there are four different, I think there's three or four major times of peak.

So in August, there's the presidious meteor shower, the Geminis in December and quadrioness.

In January, I was talking about this earlier. The Chicago, oh, hair 2006 UFO sighting.

I had just stopped working there two months prior. It was August, I think I quit. I have

friends who still worked there. They saw the UFO. Yeah, I believe them. My one friend said that

they're on manheim road, which is just to the, I think the east of oh hair airport. And he was at

a red light. He said, everybody got out of their cars and we're just like not everybody,

but a bunch of people got out of their cars and we're just staring up at a saucer floating

above the airport. You got, you know, you know the story, right? I don't know. I only pulled this

one up and mentioned this in the past. I think it was an actual saucer. No, it's a picture of it.

Spinning aluminum. This is the photo since 2006. This is well before anybody had, you know,

like high high end video cameras on their phones, a pilot apparently leaned looked over the window

of the plane and took this photo of this disc. That plane is that a united plane. I can't tell.

I worked at American American Eagle, which was right next to the United term, the terminal,

whatever you call it, American airline. I worked for American Eagle Airlines.

America's Eagle had an airline. American Eagle is American Airlines regional airlines.

Really? Not the jeans. Wow. Right next was a United and there were people in there who were like

we saw this and it hovered for minutes and a ton of people saw it and then it shot straight

up and punched a hole in the clouds. You guys heard of the Nazis. They were working on the

panel. You heard of them? Oh, yeah. It was a political movement in the 1990. They developed

this thing called the bell. And it was like a anti-gravity flying machine. The bell proves it.

Nazi bell and then like no data on it. Try and look at maybe there is and it's just not

not mainstream public. Oh, they used to go to the moon. The bell, what is it? Is it a lightweight

because there are ways to catch like the E, what is it called? The EM generator where you can

use refraction and to get radiation to create propellant and then if you're spinning fast enough,

you can reduce vertical thrust to zero so you can kind of balance yourself in midair. I mean,

that technology might be real. That's why you're not talking about the main in the high castle.

Was it the main in the high castle kind of had technology like that too? We're a fictional scenario

where Japan and Nazi Germany won World War II. It's an interesting series. It's almost like

exactly what you're talking about here. Well, that's based off of the bell theory. Yeah, yeah.

So there's also theories about Hitler having like a cult magic and researchers like he was

obsessed with magic and the dark arts. So he had like a special division. The funny thing about

this is everybody laughs like, how silly were they? So dumb. The US does exactly the same. Yeah.

The men who stare at goats, project stargator, whatever. I love this story. The story is that

the US created a siop to scare the Soviets, claiming we had psychic powers. The Soviets freak out

learning that learning this information, believing it's real that the US is developing psychic powers.

So they create their own psychic unit and then another division of the United States hears that

the Soviets have a psychic unit. So they create a real one. And that's how we developed emergent psychic

powers. Well, there's that there's that video of that guy. What's the name Chris blood? So we

talked about the other day where he said in April of 2026, Israel and Iran will be fired

necessarily each other and the orbs will rise up from the ocean. He claimed that after he got

abducted by aliens in 2007, which I know all the sounds nuts, he said that what was I going to say

that he went to the Pentagon. That's right. And the remote viewers were brought in. Oh, okay.

And then he started describing what he was told and the remote viewers used their psychic powers to

confirm what he was saying. And I was like, so they were all retarded. You'd remote view. Man,

who's imagine this? So like real quick. A guy comes to you and he's like, I was abducted by aliens.

They showed me the secrets of the future. And you went, okay, Ian, I need you to come here

and confirm this with your psychic powers. And then Ian goes, I think he's telling the truth.

And I'm like, wow, that proves it. That's what the US military did. That's desperation. Just

just going to get more and more crazy as as AI advances and also looking at how human warfare is

advanced. I'm not sure how many of you guys are familiar with fifth generation warfare theories.

Yeah. General Flynn Poon Cutler wrote the book Introduction to 5G Warfare. And first generation

warfare is people slaying each other in fields with iron. And then you move into the second generation,

which is gunpowder, third generation, different ways to maneuver the enemy planes and tanks.

Whether you're solving murders during breakfast, cracking cold cases on your commute,

or playing amateur detective at bedtime, Amazon Music's got millions of podcast episodes waiting.

Just download the Amazon Music app and start listening to your favorite true crime podcasts,

Add Free, Included with Prime. Confronting high credit card debt can feel scary.

But the good news is if you owe $10,000 or more in credit card debt, financial relief options

are now available. National debt relief is currently offering debt relief designed to reduce

what you owe and put you on the fast track to becoming debt free. If you qualify for debt relief,

you may be able to pay back less than what you owe and save thousands of dollars. Just visit

nationaldebtrelief.com. Imagine only paying one low monthly program payment you can afford

and saving money as you become debt free. National debt relief has already helped bring

debt relief to over 550,000 US consumers earning thousands of five star reviews and an A-plus rating

with a better business bureau. You're stronger than your credit card debt. Let today be the day you

start turning things around. Take the first step and visit nationaldebtrelief.com to see what

debt relief you may qualify for. That's nationaldebtrelief.com. And then fourth generation is nuclear

and now fifth generation is where we are where I can't really see a major US China conflict

militarily. The way I have to, you're going to have to nuke them, right? So it's all psychological

and it's going to mess with my mind. I disagree though because we've talked quite a bit about

the generations of warfare and fourth generational warfare is so third generation I believe is nuclear.

It's where you go to mass destruction. Fourth generational is insurgent, where you've proxy wars

and militia groups and it's guerrilla where both powers are pretending like they're not at war.

Fifth generation is where they say you're getting into psychological operations, the manipulation

of population. And the way to describe it is imagine you could go to Genghis Khan and say do not

trample the fields on horseback with bone arrow because I can win you the entire the entire land

mess of Asia with just a thought with a pen. He'd be like, prove it. If you could, if warlords

knew by saying words they would have everyone bow to them, they wouldn't go to war. That being said,

I actually think that there is a step between psychological warfare and manipulations,

post nuclear war, and that is genetic warfare. So the use of biological agents to wipe out

populations. So imagine this. You go to a warlord and say, okay, three options, horseback,

bows and arrows. That was the dominant weapon at the time. Run through the fields, take everybody

out. You own it, right? Okay, you could do that. Or I can write down on all of these pieces of

paper and everyone will bow to you as a god once they see you. We'll have to distribute the paper,

could take some time. Some people will still resist and they'll be fighting. Or I have in this

vial a virus which will kill everyone of a particular persuasion and you don't need to say a single

word. You will walk in as a liberator. I actually think many of the leaders will be like release the

virus. So before we get to the point where we try to fight for the mind of an individual,

why not just purge anyone who would oppose you? It's kind of like getting people to fold

pre-flop. I mean, you got to, you got to get before you, you know, before you try and manipulate

the rest of them to join you, you would unleash the virus. The point is this, psychological warfare

is still a battle, a battle for the mind. And so it's certainly safer and less resource,

it's less resource extensive. But I would actually argue that if you went to,

if you went to like Putin, for instance, and you're like, do you want to own the world right now,

have everything under your sphere of influence? Okay, do you want to fight for 10 years trying to plant

these ideas? He'd be like, well, if I have to, would you rather just shoot everybody? I don't know

if we have the resources for that. Would you rather unleash a virus that kills anyone who would

dare oppose you and leaves only the docile? That's easier. A virus that kills your enemy is the least

amount of work. So actually think again, the point is in the generations of warfare, psychological

warfare, I think actually maybe behind us or in front of us. But I think it's much easier

just to release a virus targeting a certain genetics, you know, subset. Well, so what's,

what's old is new again. A number of things you just mentioned, 500 years ago, one of the best

selling books of all time by Machiavelli, the prince talks exactly about how to deal with what,

what we've really failed in, what my military career spun out because I no longer believed in

counterinsurgency being a successful thing. But as far as diseases go, interesting book out,

it's been out a long time, guns, germs and steel by diamond. The Europeans that came over to the

new world eradicated the native populations because they could deal with the, with the germs,

they could deal with the diseases. But it was an accident. They didn't come here being like,

we will bring our diseases to kill them all. They came here and like, they're all dying.

The smallpox thing was intentional, but I mean before that. Yeah. The other thing to move

about it realizes, my understanding is that actually before the Europeans even arrived,

there was a pandemic, an epidemic that had hit Native American tribes across the

North and Central America already. Oh, yeah. So they already had their population reduced well

before. They could have hit by the black plague and just no written history. Well, the thing is

because the theory between why why the Native Americans were less developed and less susceptible

to diseases was a landmass and a population density. So in Europe, you have thousands of years

of history and all of these people crammed into a tight peninsula where you can't go anywhere.

Some people escaped to the other islands. They move about. But eventually, you're looking at coast.

You've got only a certain amount of arable land. And then someone else says, I want that land

and I want fishing for my family, not you. So they fight fighting results in competition,

which results in advancement of technologies, social development. The Native Americans,

they'd be sitting there nomadic, fruits and veggies, whatever they needed, hunting.

Another tribe would come up and they'd be like, oh, don't look at us. They would just break apart.

They'd leave. Now they certainly did have warfare. They brutalized each other. Certain tribes would

go and steal. However, if you were one of the more peaceful tribes and you were chilling,

smoking a peace pipe and then a scout came by and he ran up and he was like, hey, look,

you know, the Apache are coming. You just leave. There's no reason for competition. So interestingly,

this is reflected in evolution across the board. The funny thing about these theories is that

these blanks later lefties are like, that's not true. Winter and competition had nothing to do

with why people are smarter or stupider. When in reality, we know for effect, why are birds not

aggressive? Because they just leave. They can just leave. Why are badgers aggressive? Because they

can go anywhere. So burrowing animals tend to be more vicious and birds, for instance,

because they can move in three dimensions, have no reason to be aggressive. It is more successful

to not fight. For the badger, someone tries going in that burrow. They have one choice, fight or die.

Yep. So for Japan, for instance, why were they so brutal? They're on a tight island. So they're

just fighting each other until eventually you get one regime I suppose it takes over. And then

they start looking outward. This is the militant dominant faction they won and now they want more.

So they turn to the Koreas or China or otherwise. And the Native Americans were chilling,

smoking a beast bite. Unless you were Aztec and you were flaying people alive and

ripping their hearts out. What are the Comanche I hear? They were like the Mongols.

Oh, brutal dude. Brutal horseback. They would dip arrows in dung like or their own crap so

that you were dead if you got hit with it. The Comanche were like useless, you know, before horses

arrived. They were useless. Like they were thought of as scum, garbage, mountain dweller, hill dweller.

The Europeans brought horses and then they were like their Mongol ancestry kicked in and they

were like, we're taking it. Dude, I love Comanche's Mongolia. That's what people thought say.

I've heard the Asians cross the Bering Strait in North America. That's where they, you know,

so there's a shared ancestry there. And yeah, Europeans brought the horses and guns.

And then also the Native Americans are like, let's roll, baby.

I love the fighter flight has been the same even with naval warfare as well. Prior to the

advent of wireless communications, almost all naval battles were fought within a few miles of

the shore. That's the only place ships were going into each other. But now that you could ping

a enemy's location with wireless, then you had open open open battles in the ocean.

Not not only that, but for the colonial air with the trade routes, the trade routes were known

routes that were mapped typically. And if you were seeing pirates off in the distance, you could

just leave. Exactly. Now they'll hunt you down on speedboats. And then you've like, you see those

videos where the gigantic cargo vessel sprays the water off all the edges. There was that one viral

video where the dudes are just unloading on the Somalis. I can't help but feel like the gun is

better than the water cannon. They're both for two different things. So you know, water cannon

prevents them from boarding. The guns stop them from shooting at you. You know how we have those

helicopter excursions in Texas where you can go shoot hogs that are running. Yes. How much do you

think these cargo ship companies could make to let somebody fly into? They do. Djibouti and shoot

I'm pretty sure that's a thing. So when are we going? I was I think I saw a video about this

where they said that they actually allow people to pay to come on the boats with guns to fight

pirates, not even a joke. Yeah, I've heard that too. I mean, there are a lot of guys are going to

be like, because it's here's the thing. If you've got a trained security force and you're on a

highly defensible ship and you actually encounter a smog of pirates, you're usually not at risk.

Like you are going to wipe them out. And so it's kind of brutal, but I've heard stories that

they're like, I mean, you're on board and you can pay us and you can do battle. Generally,

when those those big ships are actually taken, like it's big news, right? Like the I don't think

they get taken. Yeah, well, that's that's the point ships. Like it's very it's generally safe.

What blows my mind is that they could would continue to attack those ships even though they

almost is I obviously the the reward has got to be, you know, you know, I got to be honest, if

um, if I wasn't doing this job, I would be applying for a job at Anderl, doing, yeah, Anderl,

making weapons, strapping bombs to drones and blowing things up. Talking about military

intelligence last night, because like the stuff we talk about, we're like at the level where like

you're going to go to the next level. I don't want to say it online because I don't want the

Chinese spies to hear it. I got a rather actually, I'm just saying that during Occupy, when I was

starting all of this media stuff, I was also, uh, me and my buddies were hacking drones and making

them do like surveillance stuff. We actually had this little ground drone. It's our remote control

little car. There's a ball with big wheels and you could throw it on the ground and roll it and

it would always land upright. Had a camera and you could control with your phone. So we could hack the

feed from it to the internet so that I could drive this little ball past a police line and film

what's going on. And we had that. We also had these drones. We actually built a rig where I hooked

the drone to my backpack. I had a computer running in my backpack and then I could take the drone off

my back just by lifting it up off a hook, putting it down and launching it. And the video feed went

into the computer into a hotspot and broadcast the drone footage to the internet. So we used to do

all kinds of crazy hacks. So, you know, I'm thinking about what's going on with these ships.

And I'm thinking about how sad it is that the most effective thing is just to shoot the pirate.

And I'm like, there's so many fun weapons you can do that would disrupt piracy in a way they'd

never come back for. You know, like fly down, strip their pants off, push them down on the ground.

What what else are you thinking about doing to the pirate? Like acid burst drones. Yeah, that'd be

cool too. Oh, yeah, flames. Just set the boat on fire. I don't know that we want to torture the people

alive. But, but the honest thing is like in terms of effectiveness, the most effective thing is

just to shoot a bad guy who's trying to kill you. You know, I imagine the future there will be,

especially after the Ukraine war, all the things that have been learned. I imagine it does make

sense for a ship to have drones with some kind of ordinance on it and fly the drone. So,

like, dummy, here's here's here's something that I think is is interesting. Correct. Perhaps

when you have an ant problem, how do you solve the ant problem? Well, the queen. Sure,

if you can find it, but how do you do that? Poison it. How do you get to the queen underground?

Trick the ants into taking the poison back to the queen. That is correct. And you use what is it

borax? Yes. And then what happens is they carry it on their on their on themselves back into the

colony where it starts to eat at their exoskeleton that they all start dying of dehydration.

Yeah, it gets into their joints. Yeah. There's a, I forget what it is. There's some kind of sand.

It's very, very fine. That gets into the joints in the carapace. It actually cuts, cuts them

and basically they dry out the diatomaceous earth. Yes. There you go. The dead slaughterers erect

or what do they call them? So the idea is I actually, you know, again, more to the point going back

to like the generations of warfare, it's very rudimentary to be like, we are going to attack this

person, a group of people. I think beyond that biological warfare like this, sending a person back

into their country. So a lot of people think COVID, for instance, was this because it targeted

Asians, the ACE two receptors in their lungs, which meant Asians were more heavily impacted by

the virus. And there are conspiracy theories that the virus wiped out hundreds of millions of

Chinese. The, the crematoriums were running here. Like, this is a crazy theory, but seriously,

we should, I should pull something up right now so we can talk about it. But I'll just say this.

We know that during COVID, uh, crematoriums in China were running 24, seven nonstop.

And I did, I did do a video on this a couple months ago. There is a Chinese influencer who was

like, where are all the people? And he goes to like city center in the marketplaces. And he was

like, here's a video from 2018 of the market. And it's crazy. And it's like, here's a video now.

And it's just dead empty. And it's like, where did the people go?

Do you think, um, as you're talking about like, chemical warfare and like bringing the poison

back to the queen to destroy the nest that we can do the same thing with psychological warfare

that you can poison the minds of the end of doing. And then have them bring that idea back.

Because that's kind of what comments you don't, you don't, you don't, you don't need to bring

the information back. You just pay for it to appear on the internet. It's like the internet.

The queen is watching the TV on the internet. It's no queen. That's, that's also true.

With, see, with ants, there's one making all of the babies. It's like an oligarchy with the,

with the humans, you know, you could make the argument that the, the efforts to take a ran off

the map as a global funder of terrorism would be something akin to that. But it's not one for one

kind. Let's, let's jump into the story from ABC news. Multiple waves of unauthorized drones

recently spotted over strategic US Air Force space. Now, here's what's interesting. Adam Cochrane says,

sophisticated drones attack the US base where we store the nuclear bombers. The drones had

non commercial signals were resistant to jamming. Came in waves of 12 to 15 swept over sensitive

areas of the base had long range control links were more advanced in anything seen unlike a scene in

Ukraine beyond Iranian capabilities. Some people, uh, it was reported apparently that was weapons

testing. It's the second base incursion of a sensitive site in the US in the last two weeks.

Now, actually, I think, uh, let me, let me pull this image up that, uh, that you have, Seth,

if I can, actually, it's given me the business where, uh, here we go. The US should be, you made a map

of, let me pull this in. The US should be investing heavily in, this is the path of the, of the Chinese

weather balloon or whatever it was, spy balloon. Yeah, this was February of 23. Everybody

was up in arms about the, I think there were multiple spy balloons, but this was the first one

that crashed over in the Atlantic Ocean off of South Carolina. So I wrote a, a sub stack piece about

this over on Captain K dot US. And this was viewed from a more of a geopolitical military intelligence

perspective. I like to zoom out to see the whole picture. And of course, it was lost in China,

made its way up Northeast, came across the bearing straight. Now, where it starts in our

territory, goes over two bases in Alaska. Now Fort Wainwright happens to be an army base where

there's a striker brigade headquarter. I actually served in that brigade. My last assignment.

Then it goes over four, real quick, Fort Wainwright. Uh, it's in Alaska. Where, what is, what

rate is it? Like Anchorage or it's, you know, Fairbanks area. It's, it's, it's smacked. It was

obviously fair banks. What I'm even talking about. Yeah, we had negative 60 sometimes. That's

fun. Well, once it's below negative 10, it's all about the same. You don't go outside, but

had a $500 mistake leaving the garage open one day, froze some pipes. Uh, could, could, could

have had a worse, you know, jackhammer up everything in the house. Would you like blow a bubble

in it would freeze in mid air and fall down? You could throw a boiling water pot out and

everything would vaporize before even hit the ground. Wow. It was cold. Anyway, continue. So,

so you have Fort Wainwright, which is a striker brigade headquarters. Um, you have Isles in

Air Force. Hey, y'all, it's Kelly Clarkson with Wayfair. We're delivery and set up our as easy

as a few taps on your phone. Picture this. You're relaxing in an old hammock,

scrolling Wayfair's app when you spot it, a brand new patio set. Next thing you know, Wayfair

delivers it right to your patio and sets it up. Oh, you need a new girl too. All right, Wayfair's

got you covered with Wayfair's room of choice delivery and fast experts set up on qualifying

orders. Life gets a little easier. Visit Wayfair.com or the Wayfair app. Wayfair every style, every home.

We're space next to it. But then you have Fort Greeley, the Army's cold weather training center,

and it comes down over a through Canada passes through Fairchild Air Force Base in Washington.

So Fairchild Air Force Base is a air refueling hub. And then it goes through the Rocky Mountain

States. Mom's strong Air Force Base, of course, is a is a big missile site. You have Mountain

Home Idaho, which is a 366 fiber wing, Grand Force Air Force Base North Dakota off to the north.

This is their mobility. Might not Air Force Base, NUX. You have a war and Air Force Base in Wyoming,

Minuteman 3 ICBM base, Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota. So long story short,

the spy balloon tracked its way across our key air installations. And Biden let them do it.

Apparently, you know, that's the big, that's the shock really when we talk about, you know,

I don't want to steal your thunder, but the drone story, not able to detect the sort of an

incursion or deal with it is the big problem here. Unless, again, the conspiracy theory being that

these, these meteors people are seeing are actually just interceptions. Again, not necessarily

missiles like the dark conspiracy is that we're being shot at. I don't think that's true. I think

they can't hide that. So people are like, these look like missile interceptions like when you watch

Iran and Afghan, I'm sorry, Iran and Israel, you'll see these videos of the rocket flying and

then it breaks up. And then people are like, oh, what if these are not meteors? They're,

they could be some kind of interception. Like when Owen Shroyer said he saw the drone,

person of flames and fall, could just be an interception. What if, as he was pointing out,

US drones intercepted an unknown drone and took it out of the sky. That's what Owen Shroyer saw.

Yeah, and they don't want to alert the public. Remember when they're talking about the drones flying

all over Jersey? And people were reporting seeing car-sized drones taking off and flying around.

And they just said, no, everyone's mistaken. I mean, maybe, but I mean, come on.

Question about this hot air balloon, despite balloon, what did it, what did it observe through Canada?

Did you get a read on that? Most Canadian militia strategic moose reserve.

If we look at it through a perspective of it, it must be a spy mission for the United States.

It would just simply be a transit because you don't want to miss number one. Having, having it

available to go over a mostly land would require it coming across the Bering Strait,

rather than get swept away by ocean winds. But then going across through Canada through our

strategic sites, that balloon was equipped with all sorts of optical capabilities. It seemed very

primitive, but it was actually very sophisticated. And just it's just so happened to cut through

our really important missile bases in the middle of the country. So they're collecting intelligence.

Yeah. This is the thing about warfare is it's a game of skating where the puck is going to be.

What you need to know what your enemy is going to be doing in the future rather than right now.

There's a show called Dr. Stone. Have you heard of it? Dr. Stone. It is anime magic school bus for

boys. So magic school bus is very female oriented in my opinion, right? Everybody, let's have fun.

We adventure. Dr. Stone is action combat magic school bus. So basically the story is at some point

everyone in the earth has turned a stone for some reason, 3000 years later. This super genius

Japanese kid wakes up, breaks from from his present has to rebuild society from the ground up.

And one of my favorite parts of the show is they get into a tribal conflict with a group of people

that don't want technology back because it destroyed the earth. And he, of course,

a scientist who wants to reignite the earth. And so he says we are going to create the most

powerful weapon known to man, which is, and he guesses the pencil. I'm just kind of kidding. No.

The tell the most powerful weapon. I don't know communications. Yeah, it's

and I knew I was watching the show and the moment he says that I was like it's going to be radio.

And it was radio. The ability to communicate on the battlefield can win you a war without a gun.

If you've got a bunch of guys with guns and they're pointed straight ahead thinking you're coming

and then you tell your guys via long distance, hey, they're walking towards you,

pincer attack and they break apart and go around, you can with rocks. So the ability to communicate,

the ability to transmit information over long distances is the, it's more powerful than anything.

That's why even right now in modern warfare, they're saying the fifth generation is

is information, manipulating the minds of individuals. The communication is more powerful

than the nuclear bomb. You know, these pen is my tier than the sword sand. That's right.

The Orion is shutting down the internet. The people that are shutting down the internet, I feel like

are on fighting a losing battle because it is once they, the citizens get access to the data,

it's like these regimes are done. I don't know if that's actually well, I mean, I suppose if you're

saying that once they actually get access, yeah, but you know, North Korea has a pretty good hold on

information that goes in and out. I genuinely believe there is a scenario where the US in an escalating

conflict with China brings an anthropic and says, they're already doing this using AI to target

and locate individuals. They say, let's say China escalates the conflict and we start getting war,

which genuinely puts the US at risk of like, hey, man, we're putting on World War III.

Hegseth then says, why can't we react fast enough? How are they flanking us in the Pacific

theater? And then someone says they are using advanced AI to predict our movements based on

fueling patterns based on resource distribution. They know that when we brought in a major shipment

of aluminum from Canada, they can see on satellite, the AI is predicting what we're going to build

and where we're going to put it. And so then he says, how do we preempt that? And they say,

well, we're using AI systems all the same, but we're behind. And then he says, if our AI isn't fast

enough, then we lose. And they say, well, actually, the issue isn't the AI isn't fast enough. It's

that we are monitoring the AI. We could go faster if we turn over defense to the AI. Instead of

it recommending where we fire, we let it fire of its own accord, it will be advanced by 15 minutes.

We will absolutely. And then they say, do it. And then they turn over weapons control to the AI.

And then we get, I wouldn't call it a terminator scenario, but we get a very, very terrifying

reality where weapons are being fired without human approval. Missiles are being launched. And then

China reactions says, what's happened? And they say, sir, they have just handed over full control of

their missile systems and defense systems to their AI to just fire of its own accord. We will

not be able to preempt this with human fail safes. And then Xi Jinping says, do the same. And that's

the AI mutually sure destruction where the AI's are just in a battle and we're sitting back and

watching it happen. When I think when the computers go quantum and they can exist in the maybe state,

that's when if they have control of the weapons systems and they don't have to fire, they can think

about it. That's when we're in big trouble. So that's another quantum computing.

Well, when you can exist in the one in the zero state at the same time, you can kind of wonder,

you can, you can, that's going to, that's going to break encryptions because it can flood the

password instantly, but it's not going to calculate where to drop a bomb. Yeah. And if I understand

correctly, quantum, quantum computing isn't useful for the same kind of computations that like regular

computers are like computing is not going to be able to take 300 different factors in war and then

make a prediction. This is, this is actually, we actually covered this like a year ago.

Someone broke down why quantum computing is basically only good for cracking crypto because it won't

be able to look at the entire battlefield and then calculate where to fire the missiles. Only standard,

you know, macro level is going to be a quantum computer could use a bunch of classical computers

than that. Maybe that's what they'll do. Quantum computing by allowing, by having qubits exist in

both the one in the zero allows you to crack passwords instantly. So that's useful as a component

of military technology, but you'll need standard computing to actually plan for your bombs and stuff.

Yeah. The applications are very different from what they're used for. Quantum computing is great

for certain applications and it does things that a regular computer can't, but there are things that

regular computer that regular computers are can do that quantum computing just couldn't do.

It's not, it's not, it's not like a regular computer just like gasped up in super power.

Yeah, it's not, it's not calculating patterns and predictions. It's just seeing everything at once.

Yeah. So it's not going to be able to tell you, honestly, it would be like this. The equivalent

would be you've got a psychic who can tell you exactly what's going to happen and you have a guy

who can see everywhere and the guy who can see everywhere says, I see a ship going through the ocean.

Where's it going? I don't know. I can just see it. The computer is going to be like, wait, what was

that? You said there's a ship on the ocean. Okay, let me calculate everything. If there is a ship

and this is the wind, it's going to end up here. So the quantum is basically just going to be

like a spy satellite, essentially. Being able to crack passwords, see what it's actively going on,

but not compute probabilities or make predictions. It's terrifying that it could decide anything

is terrifying. Well, so these systems are useful for narrowing down the battlefield. There are a

number of things that no advanced technology can change about warfare. You still have to feed armies,

you still have to fuel ships and planes and logistics. So when they're optimists robots.

Back in my day, which seems like so, so recently, but it was 13 years ago now, brigade combat

teams were able to deploy anywhere in the world within 96 hours. So the first brigade of the 25th

striker brigade combat team up in Fort Wayne, right Alaska, we had the port of anchors to our south

about six hours and supposedly get everything on a boat and send the troops in within 96 hours.

So people with with these systems can figure out where our refuel points are,

where are where the places that ships may be sailing, where planes are going to fly,

even people with primitive ability to project power Taliban, they would look for aircraft flying

over the same landmarks. And that was one of the guidance to air crews, make sure you vary your

flight patterns. So some of the things about military intelligence stay the same through all the

ages. Well, the, you know, as the saying goes, what is it, wars, wars are fought on the soldiers

belly or something like that, being able to feed your troops is one of the most important things

often overlooked in fiction and in history, like the invasion of the confeder forces into the north

through through the Battle of Gettysburg had a lot had had a lot to do with a couple of things.

One, they wanted to steal food. That was a big component. But the the war reason was to terrify

the north to make them feel shock. You came to fight us, we'll come to fight you and make you

feel political ramifications. But a big component of it was we're going to move north and

steal all their food because we're hungry. And that's that that's why like the British would

that's why we have the third amendment. They're going to we're going to come and send troops

are going to stay in your house. They're going to take your stuff. The first day of Gettysburg could

have completely changed the war. Lee had a beat and he if he would have seized the high ground

a little roundtop on day one, then he would have had committed the battlefield. It was normally

long street that was a defensive general and long street one of the high ground and Lee was

normally the offensive guy. The other big component there was that the I believe this was the union

began using breach loading muskets. And the Confederates were still using muzzle loaders. So the

union will take them about 20 seconds to reload, whereas the Confederates take about a minute and

half. Man, I could see something that happening in the modern war. Something changes where one side

can unload offensive ordinance 15 times faster than the other side of the sun. The repeater changed

everything. I love repeaters, dude. They're one of my I think like lever action repeaters are my

favorite guns. Like what would be how boy guns? Where can you go? Can you spin it around? Yeah,

yeah. You don't actually spin around. Would it be like laser? Probably laser weaponry. The laser's

absolutely not. You don't think laser weaponry is going to. We talked about just a super fast attack

weapon that no, we'll be evolved to. I mean, look at 5 5 6 is going to fly at what like 3,500

feet per second 3000 out of a 20 inch barrel. Yeah. So so here's the issue. The amount of energy

required for for a laser weapon to be effective is is orders of magnitude like a hundred these

orders of magnitude greater than the amount of energy. It does require a lot of energy. But they

would say like the Nazis can't attack France. It's impossible. No one. And then all of a sudden

the pans are tank. The the tiger tank. The tank that just towards the mountains and the woods that

no one knew existed. Right. So the magenta line was quickly circumvented because they didn't know

they could do it. But it really was just a failure of the magenta line. I mean, had they actually

fortified further down, they may have been more effective, but they didn't. And then the Germans

were able to go around it. And then they were like, ah, we surrender. Don't take out cheese.

There's definitely weapons. They took their cheese. They did. Well, weapons. They're almost

definitely discombobulators. Technology is being used today in Iran that nobody's ever conceived

of. We haven't been in a conventional battle for some force in a long time. This is what I'm

talking about. That's what I was saying. Like, I wasn't doing here. I'd be applying a

hand or I'll be like, bro, I will make some messed up things. Like they have you ever seen the

ion guns, their toys basically. And you can buy them where it's like a spiraling piece of metal.

And pulling the trigger connects a charge. And you can point it at like the UFO and it'll make

it spin by blasting just like ions or something. And so they have these toys where it's a vacuum

sealed glass container with, ah, there's like little little reflective panels on it resting on

just like a stick. And when you point the ion gun to pull the trigger, it starts spinning. Because

you're like hitting it with electromagnetic frequencies or something. They're like me and my

friends explored all this stuff quite a bit. We made funny silly things. I never had crazy weapons.

Here's a funny story. I had a really great idea. It's still a really great idea. Taser glove.

But hold on. Let me finish. I don't want to hurt anybody. I want to disable somebody. So when I was

a teenager, everybody was selling those ab workout shockers. You ever see those? I love them.

You put on the belt and it electrocutes your abs into working out. And they said, now you're

going to think about it. You're exercising while you're sitting at work, which is really dumb,

but people did anyway. And so when I was my 20, 22 or 23, I told my friend, let's, so the way it

works is I think it's, what is it like, low-amperage high voltage or something like this? I forgot

the mix. So it's painless, but it causes a muscle contraction. And I said, okay, why don't we put

that in a glove so that if you grab someone's arm, the same effect will lock their muscles.

They'll feel no pain, but they can't move. This would allow you in combat to disable somebody

without causing extreme pain. And they can't fight back. So we actually started working on prototyping

this out. And this guy that I worked with was like a big action sports guy. He's like, bro,

I'll hit up insert famous snowboarding equipment company. And we'll get gloves to sponsor it.

And then we'll like film it. And he hit him up and they're like, this is the coolest thing ever.

And then they agreed to send us some free gloves. And then they did. And then immediately emailed

and said, my boss freaked out and said, what is wrong with you? We don't make weapons. Please don't

do this. So the idea was in the thumb and middle finger, you will have electrodes that when you make

contact with the skin, it would have a taser like a fact without pain. So it would just cause muscle

contraction. So it's like rapid high voltage tip, tip, tip, tip, tip, like really, really fast

high current. No, no, no, it's a constant, it's a constant current. So the way those belts worked

is that it would do current stop, current stop, and it would cause your muscles to lock up. And people

would put them on their faces and go, and they put it on their arms and go, whoa. And then I was

like, why don't we utilize that, right? Some magneto and professor X stuff right there. That's

what I'm talking about. And then I said, bro, it gets better. Check it out. You can then have,

I was like, we can take a basic taser. And we can attach the components of the taser to the back

of the glove right here, and then have the electrodes in the finger for a full taser. And you can

stick people. I was like, or we can do the contraction type. And then I said, it gets better.

With the full taser, you could actually take a sword and put contacts on the sword. So when

you're holding it, it makes the sword run up to the sword. So you actually can electrocute people

with the sword or slash them. So let's say they try to deflect the sword. You can touch the sword

to them, completing the circuit, and tasing them. Yeah. And everyone thought it was a bad idea.

Zapped and cut at the time. Run it up to like an electrified elbow pad that goes to a backpack

with the generator on it. And I think you're, this is a free lightsaber thing. The thing is,

you have to have contact points and a current. That means that in order to make a taser effect,

like there has to be a, you know, a circuit. So it's not just going to be on your elbow and your hand.

They're going to be conflicting circuits. Yeah. I have these Pavlock shot clock bracelets that

help me wake up in the morning. And they tas me. What? Yeah. It's called the Pavlock. Oh, that was on,

that was on Shark Tank. And then after that guy, so it was a dumbest thing ever. I've been using them

for eight years. But why is it miserable? Oh, it does. It sucks. But I just, I'm a heavy sleeper.

You have a child. Why do you need that? Because the child keeps me up so long.

Oh, okay. I don't want to a deep sleep. Just get a sun lamp. They have sun lamps that's what,

the way it works is you set the time you want to wake up. And then within 10 minutes, it slowly

starts lighting up. And then it starts playing sounds. So it, you know, I can't stand alarms.

Like that stuff. You're sleeping. You're in a peaceful dream. I'm riding on the back of a Pegasus.

And Ian is behind me. And we're giggling and laughing together. And then I'll say,

and I'm like, my heart's going crazy. And I'm like, Ian, and then I'm like, my head hurts.

And I'm like, so I like the very light chill kind of stuff. I like, bro, at Charles de Gaulle Airport,

they do this. Have you ever been to Charles de Gaulle Airport in France? No, I think I have been through

once. You're in the airport in like the United States. And you'll hear a, attention, customers.

And you're like, oh, jeez, at Charles de Gaulle, it'll go real slow so that no one's shocked.

And then it's like, it plays this like ambient airy noise. Very polite. And it's like,

boom, jew. I don't speak French. I kind of feel like that would be something that they do in

like Japan or something very polite. No way. Japan. Yeah, they're polite there. They're being

gone. I'm just China. I feel like Germany, they would just scream. And you're like,

okay, I'm sorry. Let's talk about war more. We got the story from the FBI.

I'm sorry, we have the story from the DOJ has confirmed. The FBI is confirmed.

Cash Patel's email has been hacked by Iran. And then Daily Mail puts embarrassing private

photos and emails leaked online. I'm sorry, there's literally nothing embarrassing about it.

I mean, it's kind of embarrassing. They hacked your email through like a fishing scheme or whatever

they did. But like, here's a, here's a shocking photo of cash smiling with his girlfriend,

having fun, password, password. Here's, look at these photos. It's like, here's cash enjoying

a beautiful spring day and having a cigar. Here's cash enjoying a summer's weather with a vehicle.

I don't understand how any of this is like, ha ha, we got you. It's like, okay, well,

I mean, it is, it does suck that they got your emails. And it's like, did you guys know that cash

is favorite food is like, you know, career something? It's like, well, it's Indian, I guess.

I don't know, I don't actually know that it's true. I love curry, by the way. But I'm saying like,

the most embarrassing thing is going to be that, you know, he orders his steak well done with ketchup,

I guess. There's like nothing in here. Yeah, it's, um, it's like, oh, hey, we found out he's

kind of a normal guy. The thing is, this is sort of, um, a site of what's to come. I think,

especially if AI does autonomy and they call it the apocalypse, the Apo, meaning the removal of

the colips, which is the veil, removing the veil where it just, that's correct. It means like

revelation. Yeah, it's a Greek term. And just like everyone's email, I think, will be public

at some point. All of your, that was, will go public. Post-Soviet, that's what happened.

Post-Soviet. After the fall of Soviet Union, all of that information that was stolen started

to leak out and it leveled the playing field of people. Everybody just shut up. Except for the

oligarchs, they probably didn't get their shit leaked. So, because apparently, like after the

fall of Soviet Union, people were basically like looking at each other and being like, I know what

that guy's into. But he knows what I'm into. So I'm going to say nothing.

And ultimately, the, the capacity for, for information gathering has surpassed the human

brain's ability to comprehend it. Oh, yeah. People are so zoned out with the daily

news cycle. And I, I don't mean to bring up a memory we always, we could forget. But it's

six months later, and nobody really even talks about Charlie Kirk being shot anymore.

Well, that was one of the most, I just, I completely disagree with it. You might be right out

there, but this, we, I mean, just, just today, or just yesterday, Michael Rappaport tweeted out,

has Candace come any closer to solving Charlie's murder yet? Because it's the only thing that

woman talks about. And as a, like, I got to be honest, the only thing that is guaranteed to get

views on YouTube right now is talking about how Erica Kirk was involved in Charlie's murder.

Well, you're right. The fallout remains. I'm talking with the actual event itself. It's,

it's in the distant memory, even six months later. So this kind of stuff right here,

nobody will talk about this on Monday. Now, now, they're definitely saying, hey, look at us,

look at our capabilities here. People, people don't remember. In fact, when Ian was a

rest and jailed for mercilessly beating that child, and it's just not even the news anymore.

I know. Well, so people are just over, people are over all the, all the scandal and all the

stuff. So even if there wasn't anything bad in there, you know, Trump took a lot of the,

the personal stuff out of politics where he took so many areas over. He did this. He said that

he knew this person where now it doesn't really land. They're trying the same thing with Ken

Pasthen in Texas and people are ready. They're saying about him. They're saying stuff about Ken

Pasthen? Well, he, he was, he's going through a divorce. And, you know, there's a lot of

that's right. That's right. It's totally forgot about that. So he's one of the 50, he's one of the

50% of Americans who are going through or are divorced, right? So congratulations. Yeah.

I don't know what to believe. A lot of it's fake. So that's why my mind glazes over. Who initiated

the divorce? It was his wife, right? She did. You work too much. Death before dishonor. I don't

even want to get him divorced is unacceptable. It makes no sense to me divorce. But neither does

marriage. No, I think we should get rid of no fault divorce. And courts should require

counseling before divorce is allowed. And only and only divorce should only be allowed if I'm not

even a big fan of infidelity as a, as a cause for divorce. I think there should be a penalty

on the other individual. But I would say that abuse should be like, I mean, the only reason to

warrant a divorce. It was hard to prove. That's part of the argument is like a woman would be like,

he's abusing me like, I don't know. I'm not. Lots of things are hard to prove. So what?

Lots of things are hard to prove. Then the guy would just keep beating the hell out of his wife.

And then, and then eventually they're going to be like, okay, here she is blighted up and beaten

again. The cops would eventually come in. Look, if a woman shows up and she's totally fine with

no harm to her and she's like, I was abused, they'll be like, I mean, you can't accuse a guy

of a crime without proof. It doesn't matter if it's abuse or otherwise. I guess we can record

stuff now. And then you can fake recordings too. Agreed. The issue for me is when it comes to the

me two stuff, it's always like, this should be the one area of law where I don't need proof. It's

like, what? Shut up. No, you need proof. You can't accuse someone of crime without evidence.

I mean, like, well, actually, no, you can. I mean, you need sued for defamation, I guess.

But if you want to prove and have penalties under the under law, like, you need evidence of a crime.

So divorce. No. I mean, is that, do you guys want to talk about it? I've mixed feelings. We

already are. I don't think people should be allowed to get divorced. No, no, I like no fault

divorce. I think people should be able to walk away from a marriage at the top of the head.

No, because I don't owe you anything. I don't know. When you under a

dinner, it only made a contract. You made an agreement. Maybe I owe or have signed a prenup. I

don't know anything. The contract as stated is till death do us part. And you don't get to break

that contract. That's a, that's a, I'll take that out of the contract. Then don't get married.

It's just a, see, this is the problem. I'll get married. Just turn to money. You're not, no,

business, dude. Marriage is just a, is like a, it's just a problem. Business contract. No, no, no.

You're talking about dating. If you want to date someone, that's fine. That's fine.

All your money and not having to pay taxes on it. What? That's what you can do with your wife.

No, you can, you can put it on a bank account and she can spend it. If you think that, if you,

that's wrong, that's not true. If you think the only, it's not correct. I am married and

high net worth. And what I'm telling you is that is wrong. You say if you put money in your

joint bank account, she can't spend it without paying taxes on it. Yes.

Ian, I can't give my mom money. Your wife. I understand what you're saying. I am, I am,

I am making a point about misconceptions on how this stuff works. So wait, if you put $100,000

in a joint bank account with your wife saying if she spends that money, she has to pay taxes on that.

Yes. How much? Depending on her income. It's income. You pay taxes on it before it gets put

into the, I know. I cannot create a joint account for anyone, be it my wife, brother, mom,

child. If I claim as a dependent, I can. The way taxes work, my wife has to choose whether or not

her income and my income is the same thing or not. If it's the same thing, it's all tax no matter

what. If it's not, it's income. She's to pay taxes on it when I give it to her. Yeah, I know.

I'm talking about money. You've already paid taxes on that you put in your joint bank account

together that you guys own together. That's your money in. She will have to pay taxes on it.

Okay. So if I get paid from my job, okay, and then I put that money in an account and she uses it,

that's income after the fact. If I pay taxes on my money and exchange it with literally

anyone else who is not a dependent, they have to pay taxes on it, married otherwise.

So you can choose to file jointly or you can file separately. Separately means her money is

her money. My money is my money. And if I give her money, she has to report it as income.

And if you file jointly, jointly then she, all the money she gets pays the same tax rate as myself

as one lump of money. That means if you are ultra wealthy and you're, this is what people think.

This is not what works. Imagine a guy's a billionaire and he says, I am going to marry this woman

and she can spend my money as she sees fit, but she ain't going to pay taxes on it because it's not

income. That's, that's just not correct. That's just not how it works. She can join in with you

and all the money is taxed, the highest tax bracket. Or she can say, my money is my money,

taxed the lower bracket. And then I give her money and it's taxed income. You don't like,

the craziest thing to me is that people think, I guess it's just a lack of experience or understanding.

People, you can't give family members money. There's, it's taxed. The gift limit from the IRS

applies to all people regardless of their family. The only exception is dependence. You can give

dependence money. So when over this, the first thing I did when I made money, I said, I'd like to buy

my mama house and my accountant says, you cannot do that. And I said, what? Why not? And he goes,

it will be income. She must pay taxes on that house. And I said, so what is that resultant? And he

was like, okay, well, a $300,000 house, for example, you buy that, you gift it to your mom. That's

$300,000 income. She will owe, you know, 23% or whatever. So she's gonna owe $60,000 to the IRS.

And if she doesn't pay it, they'll seize the house. And I'm like, what? So what do I do?

You can't do anything. Congratulations. Like, this is how the, this is how tax law works.

I just want to clarify this joint filing jointly. So if you make a million dollars, pay taxes on it.

You walk away with what, $500,000. You put it in your joint bank account. Yep.

Your wife then, if she spends that money, she has to pay taxes again on it. Correct.

And what is that? Another, another, whatever her income is and whatever she bracket,

she's taxed that should have to pay tax on it. Income, but she's, she doesn't work.

Yes, income is income regardless of whether you have a job or not. You've already paid taxes on

your income. You're having the joint bank account. You're saying, yes, now you can spend it and not

pay taxes on it. That's right. If she does, correct. She has to pay taxes on it. What if she uses

your joint bank account card? That's, that's, she has to pay tax on the income. So if you're the one

handing the card over, there's no tax. But if she's the one handing the card over, that, that

payment gets taxed, what do you? Correct. If she buys a hat on Amazon, she has to pay income

tax on that. You are correct. Yes. So what do people just, they just use your card for everything?

No, that would be lying to the IRS. What do people do? Why would they pay double tax?

I'm sorry. Ian's becoming an anarchist. Either I'm misunderstanding it or you are

misunderstood. Yes, very strange data. Anytime money is transferred to another person,

that person must pay taxes on it, right? Income does not mean job. It does not mean W2.

Income come, come, come from many different sources. It can be W2G, your favorite. That's gambling

earnings. You play Game of Poker. You lose, you win a hand. That's W2G. It's taxed at 23%. I think

23, it's 23% capped, meaning even if you're a billionaire, it's still 23% whereas actually,

no, no, no, no, I think it might be general income these days, meaning it'll be taxed at the 37.5 or

whatever. So again, I have a joint bank account and my wife is choosing to file solely and separately.

No, no, no, no, jointly. That's what I'm talking about. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, you must

This break is brought to you by Adobe Creative Cloud, the ultimate creative toolkit.

With over 20 apps at your fingertips, there are always new ways to explore your creativity.

Transform images with Photoshop, design graphics with Illustrator, edit videos with Premiere Pro,

or animate just about anything. No matter what you want to create, Adobe has the tools you need

to bring your ideas to life. It's all in Creative Cloud.

There's a moment right before a home repair goes wrong. When you say, what if I try this?

That's when things get really tricky. When it comes to heating, plumbing and electrical,

just leave it to the experts. Crop Metcalf handles everything

from regular home maintenance to worry free repairs. Book today at serviceexpress.com

and save $90 on an HVAC Precision tune up.

Just understand. Oh, you're saying if we file taxes jointly, that's one person and that means.

So let me explain. If I am married and we both say we are filing as a married couple,

if my wife goes and takes a job for $100,000 a year, she will pay 37.5 the highest tax bracket.

Understand? Yeah. Because our income is one income. Right. Now she might say, that sucks. Normally,

I'd only pay 23% if we filed separately. You can do that too. Then she works a job at $100,000

a year, files separately. Her income for there is only $100,000 and she pays 23%.

I then can't give her money. I can buy things for myself and my dependents. She can benefit from

them. But if she takes money from my account to spend, she has income. That's just it.

That's how it works. I've been talking about filing. I never mentioned filing separately ever in

this column. You did. I talk about filing jointly. You did. You said you could get married to someone

and transfer your wealth and you got to pay taxes on it. That's not correct. You can marry someone

and you file jointly. Why would you ever let your wife go to the store and buy hamburgers if she

has to pay income tax on that? Whereas if you go to the store, you don't have to pay income tax.

That's why people don't file separately. No. If you're jointly filing, you just told me that if you

file jointly, the first thing I said was joint filing makes your income one income. It's easier to

keep telling me that if you file jointly and the woman spends the money she has to pay in double

income tax on it. You've misheard me. That's not what I said. This is why I hire out my taxes.

I was, I mean, and you miss crazy. Did you, did I, did I hear what I said? I have explicitly said

it's recorded. So I'm going to rewatch a little bit confused because like, so you said a joint

bank account filing separately. No. I know or when a married couple files jointly and they have

a joint bank account, you only have to pay income tax on that when the man brings the money in.

And then you can spend, both of you can spend it on whatever you want. That's my understanding.

Yes. Okay. Then why would you say that no, she has to pay taxes on it? Because you made the claim.

Sorry. You can get married and your wife, no, I did not make, I did not claim you can use

marriage as a business transaction to avoid paying taxes. It is a bit, the marriage license is a

form of a, of a business contract. That's what I said. It's, it's, it is a contract. I don't

call it business contract. I mean, you can share money, didn't work on things together without

having. Again, this is, this is the point. When you marry someone, you can file jointly, which

means your spouse has to pay taxes at the same rate as you because her income in your income is

the exact same. Okay. So you're not avoiding taxes. You're not, yeah, but she doesn't have to work.

But that's just you choosing to give someone money. What do you mean? Right. But you can't give

other people that same amount of money without having to pay gift taxes and things like that. And,

but your wife, what was your point limited amounts of money to essentially? If you're filing jointly

as one person, it's, it's, it's, it's a, it's a, indeed. Yeah. Yeah. That's, I don't understand what

your point is. My point is that it's, that's why I consider it a business contract because it's

like having a partner business owner to go back to the beginning. This is the problem with, with

modern society is that marriage is dating now. I mean, marriage is a business license, dude. What

do you mean? Purpose of marriage is a, it's a death contract. That's why people should not be allowed

to break it. Yeah. They mean that was the original. Yeah. That was of course the original purpose of

it was you own that woman basically. No. It was. No. She had to change her name. Responsible.

She didn't have rights. Remember, women couldn't have credit cards until the 70s. They couldn't,

or that is, I, I strongly object to your framing fell. She didn't have rights. Of course,

women had rights. Please enlighten me with your thoughts. What rights did women not have?

Friared. There was a point in time where women were considered the way that Ian sang. They

were considered property because they were not responsible for their own behavior. They couldn't

own, they couldn't own property. They couldn't have bank accounts and stuff like that. So the reason

that women were considered right to a bank account, you couldn't, women couldn't own, they,

women couldn't have credit cards and stuff like that until I couldn't vote either. Yeah, but,

but the reason women couldn't have, yeah, couldn't vote and stuff. The reason women couldn't have

credit cards was was not because it was like, oh, women are second class, it was because they

didn't have, they didn't work. They didn't have credit. It wasn't like these women shouldn't be

allowed to buy things. I do think that you couldn't have a credit card in your name as a woman.

Because we went over this already a long time ago. It had to do with property ownership and credit

lines as opposed to your a woman. And so some women did have credit cards. Companies chose not

to issue them. So because you were considered less likely to have income. My, my broader point is

women and men that got married, the man was responsible for the woman, right? So the,

there was, that was one of the things that the suffragettes did, you know, one of the arguments

against women's suffrage, women that did not want the right to vote said, well, then we're going

to have all the responsibilities that men have right now. We don't have the same responsibilities

that men have. If we get the right to vote, they're going to eventually have, etc, etc. And even

things that we talk about here, here Tim talks about, you know, women should be up for the draft

because they need, they have full enfranchisement. The reason that you, you were, women were considered

second class or didn't have quote unquote rights is because they didn't have the corresponding

responsibilities. Long story short, if you publicly state till death to us part, that's it, no divorce

ever. I mean, I think there should be extenuating circumstances like if you're, if you've got a

violent husband or something like that, fine, but otherwise, you can prove it. Yeah, and otherwise,

yeah, like you make it, you make commitment and you make a promise. The whole point of it is

I'm committing my life to you. We're in this through thick and thin, the idea that well, I just

don't feel like it. That's not good enough. Yeah, life, I think society would be so much better if

people were forced to adhere to their, their word, meaning like if you made a vow, that vow is law.

So contract law, obviously, then we dispute. No, I didn't agree to that. And then it's a

adjudicated. Can you prove that this is, you know, who was right as was wrong? And that means

sometimes bad people will figure ways to wheeze a lot of their bond and their word. But marriage is

pretty simple. You sign that, you sign that marriage license and you say that till death to us part

it's like, well, okay. And there's, that's it. And the exception, of course, is a criminal action,

yeah, criminal activity, infidelity violence. I don't agree with infidelity either. No,

no, I think there should be penalties for infidelity. Certain penalties. I don't, we have to

navigate how that is, but someone who is, you know, engaged in infidelity, I suppose,

you know, maybe we put it like the, the aggrieved partner has the right to dissolve the marriage

if they so choose. And the individual, the perpetrator, the guilty is no longer allowed to

enter into a marriage contract. You have to be trusted. That's too much government for me.

That's too much oversight. I kind of want to optional. Yeah, I mean, I mean, it's optional.

I don't got to get married. I used to believe that, that I used to believe in like too much

government for, you know, government should be out of everything. But I have, I have so little faith

in people nowadays. I really think that people need, need guide rails on life. Government has

only recently been involved in marriage. Yeah, wasn't a government thing when it first started.

I know that that perspective is fairly unpopular, but like people, people need some kind of

guide rails and with the, with religion, not giving them the guide rails that they, they used to

have, like I think that there still needs to be something that keeps people kind on the straight

narrow. At the very least, incentivizes them to keep on the straight narrow, even if it isn't

said, you know, let's, you're going to go to get thrown in jail for it. Let's go nuts. We got

this story from TMZ, looks maxing, clivicular shoots up dead gator. All boy. So at first, that was

thing like I think might, maybe it's fake, but you can clearly see when they're pulling the trigger,

the, these are live rounds. They also, I don't know if they have the video here. I think we have it

pulled out and zoom into that. No, no, that's black eyes are closed when that gun's going off. Oh,

that's a button there. Yeah. He's like, ah, what do we got here? Let's play this.

So this is a crime. Even if the gator is dead, this is illegal. They also, so they unload.

He's keeping his eyes closed too. Wow. That's terrible. Yeah.

Oh, you're not supposed to do that. So that's, that's wrong. Here's the thing. Was it dead first?

They, I don't know if it was always dead. Yeah, I think that gators.

Okay. So here's a dead gator just floating along a river. No, usually alive.

They are usually alive. And he was like, in the guy's like, yeah, that gator's

dead because he shot at once and killed him. Here's the other thing. There's there's video of him.

They're in the Everglades and they're shooting into open fields. He's got a rifle. That's illegal.

It's also psychotic shooting with no backstop. They don't know what they're shooting at.

Someone says on camera, there's, there's maybe people down there that could be lying for attention.

Doesn't matter because the Everglades have people and animals and shooting randomly with no backstop

criminal. They also open fire on a drone, which appears to be theirs.

Also super illegal. Bro, this dude committed like seven felonies on stream. It's wild.

I'm sorry. Gen Z is losing their minds. This dude is getting attention because this is what gets

attention. Obviously, we're giving attention. He was arrested for assault. He's being investigated

for shooting the dead gator, stressing shooting a dead gator is still illegal. And people are

going to be like, well, that's dumb. The gators that doesn't matter because the issue is the

reason why they have wildlife protections is to balance the ecosystem. The reason why this is bad

is that normally animals would come and eat the gator carcass. Now they're full. It's full of lead,

which is going to result in other animals. You cannot do this stuff. It's illegal firing up

into the air anywhere is insane and shooting at any drone, whether you own it or not is illegal to

FAA violation and a felony. You cannot shoot drones, even if you own it. If you miss, you're still

firing up into the air. One of the reasons why you can't do it. And I think this dude should be

in prison for a long time. He's a meth addict, self-described meth addict, who sterilized himself as

hopped up on a whole bunch of goofballs. And now is on camera shooting illegally into these animals

done matter. Now, maybe they fake the whole thing and it's a fake gator. They put it there and

propped up. I really doubt it because most people don't know. And they probably assume it's not

illegal to shoot a carcass. They're in the Everglades. You can't do this even on private property.

And the response from people are like, they're in the middle of nowhere. Who cares? Let them do it.

Bra, I'm not playing these games dude. This is going to get guns banned. This is the kind of

this kind of stuff where Democrats will come out and see and say, this is a legal gun owner.

And they're not killing people. But this is the kind of reckless psychotic behavior.

Who was it? Who was Chuck was driving down the street? Remember the bullet hit his car?

Yeah, yeah, Charlie. Someone was shooting and he was driving in a bullet hit his car. And that's

the kind of stuff that gets guns banned. Yeah, I think that we need to look at the generations.

I was 23 when I got my first smartphone. So I at least got to grow up through high school and

most of college without one. So there was a period of time when the internet came out where we had

some connectivity to each other, but not completely always connected where everybody was recording

something all the time. So this generation clearly is needing constant stimulation, constant

stuff to look at. And they can't repeat the same stuff. So it's going to get more and more

extreme. And if somebody ever comes by me and my wife and sprays us with a supersoaker,

like we saw yesterday, they'd better be able to run with it. Oh, that happens.

It was a big video yesterday where somebody was going down the street spraying everybody

with a supersoaker. You're dead. If I'm walking with my wife and child and you pull up anything

and pointed at me, everything's good on our end. And I want to be very careful here. I am

talking about in defense of my baby daughter. I am not going to wait to figure out if you're

playing a prank or not or intending to spray me with acid. And I want to stress this. I want to

stress this. I'm going to be very, very careful. I know it's a very maybe maybe we'll believe that.

Callen. All right. The time down. It's good. He's he's he's bored. Shit. But let I know

pre-recording is great. I want to stress this. I will defend myself with whatever force

available to me available, which is available to me if you aim anything at my wife and child.

I am not going to be like, well, now hold on. My my one year old baby daughter. Maybe it's just

water. Hell no. We get we get threats of acid attacks. We see acid attacks. I ain't sticking

around to wait to figure out what you're trying to do. There's a video of a of a black dude walking

up to a guy's car with a with a canister of gas, but it's water and starts splashing on the vehicle

and the guy draws his gun. And then the guy's like, no, no, no, it's water. It stops. It stops. It

stops. It's happening. It goes. You almost died. You dumb mother effort. Yeah. Not playing around.

You you come up to my car with a canister of gasoline and start splashing it. I'm not waiting for

you to light it up. It's not happening. I'll be calling the insurance company to fix the glass

before Mike Tyson is one of the smartest people to ever resist in the modern age. He said that

that thanks to the internet that nobody's really afraid to get hit in the face anymore. Yeah.

And then once people do stuff like that, they don't realize that there's people with what's really

crazy about these videos is how many time how many times they're they're flagging each other

basically. Like I'm surprised these retards didn't die. Like dudes waving is going around like a

moron. They they have no no discipline. Clearly, they're shooting in an open field. I'm like,

yeah, that's how someone gets shot in the face. I mean, it's unlikely that that would happen

because they're in the Everglades, but to your point earlier, like no, no, no, no, no. These

undisciplined guys waving guns around. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. The penalties are the same if they

hit somebody that's on them. Yeah. This is the Everglades. This is probably a national park,

which makes me wonder how they got the clearance to even shoot that because I went on a tour

there. It's just park. Yeah. Have any. Yeah. You can carry your under investigation right now.

But the the idea that you can just go and go and start shooting an animal because, you know,

they likely won't be allowed to own guns in the future after. Oh, yeah. I mean, he's already in jail.

He he admits to using meth. He shouldn't have a gun in the first place. Oh, oh, he's oh,

that's a good point. He's in deep trouble now. Yeah. He was already in trouble, but he's admitted

to using meth. They're going to add this to and be like, they're if he if this goes to trial,

they're going to be like, do you use meth? He's going to be like, no, and they're going to be like,

you say you did. He's going to have to admit everything's fake. I think it's all fake.

Like he claims he wakes up in the morning and hits himself in the face with a hammer. It's just

fake stuff. I kind of believe it though. It's possible, but I would say this, either way it shows

a serious problem with for Gen Z. You're not going to make enough money. You're jobbed by a house.

So Gen Z has stopped saving. In order to get fame and attention, you have to be a you have to

be retarded. So clavicle is like a clavicular or whatever is like Brandon Peters. Indeed. He's

like he says he does meth. I'm sorry, Braden. He sterilized himself. Yep. That's the kind of thing

he thinks he needs to do to get attention. And that's what's working to sterilize himself. Yeah,

because he takes testosterone, right? Yeah. He's sterile. He's sterile. He's sterile. Literally.

Yes, he says he said out loud. I'm sterile. That's right. Crazy. And his balls shrunk.

Wow. He named himself after the clavicle. Right.

If the funny thing is here's why I think it's fake personally, but what I'm going to tell you why

I think it's fake because the dude might be like, let me do this clavicular. It's called

Braden. Come humiliate. Well, everybody knows what his name is. The reason I'm going to tell you

why I think it's fake. Let me find, let me find the mug shot of him. This is why I think he's not

really doing any of these things. His chin is off center. His lips are imbalanced. He's got one

nostril bigger than the other. His eyes, he's got, he's, he's got offset eyes. Like, I don't think

this guy's actually looks max. He's pulling up. He looks like originally though. Before he claims

to have their original photo. Yeah, there's like a previous like when he was 16 or something like that.

Yeah, the looks. Yes. Yeah. I don't believe that. Well, could be lies, but what is it?

I'm pulling it up. Supposedly that's him in the beginning before he maxed. I don't, I don't

think that's true. I don't think he's done like airbrushing maybe, but and you can exercise,

but I don't think he's done the more extreme things that he's claimed to do. Like his ears are

uneven, his eyes are off. Like, I don't believe this guy is actually working really, really hard

in terms of the extreme things like hitting yourself with the hammer and getting surgeries.

I think he's probably just generally working out maybe taking testosterone, but that seems

weird for a 19, how's he 19? Oh, you don't need to take testosterone. He was taking it since before.

I think it like ruined his puberty even. This is what I heard. I don't know if that's true.

This is like the the male version of the jazz Jennings or plastic surgery. It's not quite trans,

but it's sort of the body maxing thing is kind of trans. We've created a pretty, we've created a

pretty unhealthy society for young folks that feel like they need to keep up with everyone else

as social media. A lot of those kids that are in the in their early teens think that they're

they're the long and shorter what their life is is to become an influencer. Yeah, and it results,

but they have to outdo one another constantly and get more and more crazy with the kind of content

they make and that of course makes it dangerous for everybody else. Yeah, I love well part of me. I

guys 19 like I know what it is vengeance. I like seeing the the prankster get fucked up like I

like seeing the prankster going too far and then the guy reacting normal and fucking the guy up

and the guys like I'm so sorry. I'm so sorry and you're like yeah, I know and you're going to be

more sorry. I love that. I just I feel like they deserve it and it satisfies me, but it's like I

don't want to like go down that hell hole too much, but I do love watching bullies get the shit

Oh, is this he was arrested for running someone over? Is that what it was? Yeah, that's what I heard.

When I first heard his name, it was because of him being arrested for it. So is this is it?

What the? Is this it? I don't know how you don't see you can't see anything. Like I think

I mean, he got arrested, but I I wonder how much of this is fake. You know what I mean, like

because in the videos you never actually see them doing anything. Like that gator, I got to be

honest guys in the social media age, you buy a dummy deadgator, you pull up your throw out in the

water, you shoot into it. You're on a private piece of land that swampy that looks like the everglades

and then you say you did it. Everyone says that's illegal. You're gonna go to jail. We make segments

about it and then you're like it was a stunt. It was a stunt done on a controlled set with a prop

and then with this, you don't actually see anything. Yeah, I could all just look watch. Here's a guy

jumping on his car.

You don't see anything. Yeah. Now they're saying he was arrested. I bet he wasn't even I wouldn't

be surprised if he wasn't arrested. And it's just influencers going, man, he got arrested.

Dale records. It drum up some attention, man. Get your name out there. Clavicular.

Braden. Sorry, dude. I don't hate you. I just it's sad to see a guy in his mid 20s overdose on drugs.

He gets super famous and burned out in the 20s. He's like early 20s.

22. Famous a drug, dude. And you're a better human than what you look like. He appeared to run

over someone who was jumping on his truck, claiming self-defense. It's unclear whether it was a stage

stunt. I think it's all fake, right? Like I don't I don't think the dude actually bone smashes,

does math. These are all shock claims. 19 year olds don't need to take testosterone. His testosterone

is probably already like 800, you know, well, I've seen video of him actually.

Doing it. He's not like hitting himself hard. It's very much just tapping on you.

Yeah, you can do it with your own hands, too. I know that's what I'm saying. I don't think it's

real. I'll grow in the direction you push. Oh, damage the skin. And then he would have,

he would have welts and damage skin in his face. I would like pull my jaw open. Like pull it's

now. It's not a thing either. It moves it over time. It's like like a play. Bone is kind of like

clay. A friend's dad said instead of braces, he just pushed on one of his teeth every day for like

two years and it fixed it. What will happen is you push it and then it starts growing in that

direction until it gets pushed in a new direction that starts growing in that direction.

From my experience is what it seems like. Also, I get ingrown toenails. Yeah.

People will cut their nails too short. Yeah. And then it'll start growing down and then it'll get

and then it's on that direct. They do that out in my 20s. That's a good thing for people to learn.

Like don't cut your nails too short and you will not get ingrown. Yep.

Because then it can't. I think social media is largely fake. But the point is whether or not

this guy's real or it's all just one big reality TV show, which is I think it's probably reality TV.

I don't think I'd arrested. I think the the shooting that they're doing is probably all staged and

fake and they're lying. Like there might have been controlled backstop. You can't see off camera

because they want to make shot content. I do think it's possible there are a bunch of retards

going around shooting guns. That happens too. But it's really easy to fake all this stuff. I mean,

most of the internet is fake. You've got reaction videos. People are reacting to AI videos they make.

They'll go on to rock. They'll make an AI video and then they'll react to it and go whoa

and they'll get a million views and you'll get paid. So I don't I don't see why anybody would have

to do what he's doing literally the the vehicular assault. You never actually see anything happen.

And in fact the guy rolls off the side. It looks like an even get hit. It did not look like a

assault at all. It looks fake. You got run over. Well, he rolls off the top of the truck. I don't think so.

I think I think I would lean more towards. He's a character. He was propped up. It's reality TV

content. It's it's just meant to be shocking internet content. He does seem high. I will say that.

I've seen some of his videos and he looks like I looked in my mid 20s. High as hell. Like maybe it

was weed. It's probably be acting. Maybe, but he's so high. He seems very like actor. Maybe,

but he's really really vapid like that that whole like I look. The point is this. Gen Z is seeing

this being told it's real and they're being told this is how you get famous. So the unfortunate

and result is a lot of young people. Jan Alpha are going to be like, I want to be famous like him too.

And they will start doing these things and running out running people over and stuff. That's why I like

seeing these bullies get there. Come up and. Yes. That's a good way to put it. Why I like seeing these

like these publicity stunt Mongols getting like slap back down to reality. I do like that because

I don't I think it's an emergent. And the phenomenon that people will start replicating if we don't

stop it. Like I don't want people running up to someone in a shopping mall with a fake gun and

be like, Oh, get on the ground. And then it's a prank dude. Look at look at the mall not too far

from here that we sometimes go to where the whoop the was it door dash driver. Remember the story?

Hey, shot the guy. He shot the guy in the chest. It was a prank. Because the guy kept shoving

something in his face and he backs off and he pulls the gun and shoots. I'm like, I don't know what's

going on. And then they criminally charged the guy who's defending himself. The insane self defense.

That's Virginia. I think he got he that the shooter was acquitted though. Yeah, he maybe he

maybe back then, but nowadays he would not be. I don't know. They're both white with the existing

agents. Yeah, yeah. Yeah. I be if the YouTuber was black maybe.

Yeah, for real. If the if the YouTuber is white and the the guy shooting was black, no charges.

If the YouTuber is black and the shooter is white, he's can locked up for 20 years.

You know, if they're both white, I think people just say, I don't care. Is

you think having clavicular on the show be a good idea? No. Nick Fuentes. What is he?

Pretty well. I could. But like Nick Fuentes has ideas about things, whether he's right or wrong,

clavicular is just a functional retard. Just bring him on to be like, hey, change your life.

Please. Why? I mean, people watching. Yeah, basically. Yeah. I mean, hey, you want to be a

associate. Bring him on to make culture jam. Fix this guy. I don't think that we should be

bringing people on to try and have an intervention. That's what I want to do in 2026.

Consider this is how he makes money, right? Like this ridiculousness is what he actually does.

Like the ridiculousness is how he has a fan base. He's we're not going to be like, hey,

dude, you should stop doing this. You're like, yeah, I'm not going to make the money that I make.

No, no, no, stop. But do it better. Do help people.

So people do this on Twitter or X all the time. It's not as extreme as this,

but the X economy is similar. 40% higher engagement for negative and blackpilling posts.

Yeah. And that's why you want to get into the political side of things. Why people are so negative.

There's a lot of things to analyze that go, you know, for the long run, good, bad,

and everything in between. But a lot of people have figured out how to monetize and make it,

make it hum. Yeah. I mean, the monetization on X is, I'm, they're good things and bad things

about it. Because you do see people trying to make more nuanced posts with intelligent takes.

But, you know, there's still the situation where it's like you get some kind of slot picture

or whatever and you make a dumb comment and it goes viral for some reason. Or you just say

something that's controversial and people are just like, oh, some of the biggest posts that I've

ever put, it ends up like breaking kind of out of my bubble. And it goes into spaces with people

that strongly disagree with me. And then the, you know, the, the replies are just a neverending

stream of criticism and telling me how stupid I am. But it's like, I mean, you made me a boatload

of money this week, you know? So that, that happens regularly too. Well, that's why people screenshot

folks when they want to rip on them so they don't get any benefit from the share. But it's a,

I think that people that put content out there, if X is making revenue on it, then that makes sense

to me. You know, I've had friends that played Major League Baseball and you talk about some of

these player salaries. Well, if they're contributing to the team's bottom line, then of course, that's

your share of this. But I think that people game the system, people are quick to, they don't want to

do their own research. I say it all the time, we have more access to information than anybody,

any people that have ever lived before, but less discernment than any group of people have ever

lived before. All this stuff is out there to research and analyze. Yeah. Even electoral forecasting,

which I do. Yeah. How are the midterms going to go? Well, I've gotten 92 years of history. They

could tell you how they're probably going to go. Democrats. Democrats in the House Republicans

in the Senate narrow majorities. Yeah. And then Democrats are going to use the subpoena power

to the most extreme degree imaginable. And Republicans are going to go, whoa.

Unfortunately, yep. Whoa. I mean, the Democrats are going to take the house. Do you think that they're

actually going to start just doing all kinds of impeachments and stuff? Do you think that's on the

table? Honestly, I think what's going to, so, so the fight isn't over, you know, I think if you're

a Republican or a Trump supporter, of course, you want to do everything possible to keep a

Republican majority. But the damage is already done because people disengaged during primaries,

which is the time to get rid of these useless incumbents. So really, the best you're going to get

is really the same we have now. But I think in the long run that Democrats taking the House will

arguably be a better blessing for the American right than Republicans holding it. Because you're

going to have Trump's economy, you'll probably turn at some point. It takes a long time to turn

an aircraft carrier around. The Dems are going to abuse the power. And just like in 23, when Trump

had done two years of being blamed for J6 and elections, it's going to unify the right. It'll

turn. People's short memory spans are going to come into play here and all of a sudden with Trump's

economy turns, then you're going to have in 2028. Everybody's going to be running Republican again.

This happened in 22 with DeSantis. He just rising up. And then you get the DeSantis faction

of the Trump faction fighting. And then once we get closer to 24, everyone started uniting again.

So here we are. Everyone's like, oh, Meg, the coalition is fractured and things like that. Like right

now, after the Democrats went in the House and they start just beating the crap out of people,

then you're going to get the right rallying against a shared enemy. It's a no doubt or to me.

I'm not worried about the midterms. People need to start getting involved in the process and

putting forward regular people that can race funds and run for office. Until then we're going to

have people like John Thune punch out like we did here on an Easter break. But it's always going to

be I don't think we ever changed this to be completely honest. Like let me clarify, I don't think

in the short term we change this. In the long term, maybe things will change, but if you're

once you get to that level of power, you know, the amount of work you have to do to maintain that

power, you're not going to swing one way or the other. You're going to just float. You don't want

to be rallying anybody. You'll draw attention to yourself. Marco Rubio is doing real well in the

polls by kind of just being quiet. He's doing his job. He's not fighting anybody. He's not posting

insane things like F the Democrats or whatever. And it's doing well for him. I mean, I like it to be

honest. Yeah, I think that the 2028 nomination contest should be interesting. I would think that

JD Vance will probably have the inside edge based on being the VP right now for there to be a

market for anybody else. I think you'd have to have a real collapse of the administration for

the next few years. And I don't think too many people want that to happen. Yeah, right now the

prediction markets have it almost tied Rubio in vans. I mean, vans is at 37 rubios at 26.

My bet's on Rubio. I mean, I'll get Carlson. There's talk. There is talk. My bet would be on

Rubio actually. I'm not somebody to make any bets. Just don't know what the best bet out there

is Susan Collins at 27% to win the US Senate in Maine. She is going to win.

Yeah, I don't imagine that that the that she ran 40 points to the right of Obama in

08 in Maine. Yeah, and grand plan is terrible. She's these plan is the guy she's going against,

right? The guy with the not I don't think that's the society at Janet Mill's the governor is also

running. So I have a feeling that this is the that's the nominee. Do they have the actual

main race? Let me just type in Maine. Yeah, I'm not sure. Oh, wow. So it's not that they have

the Democrats winning Maine at 71.7%. Is that what you were referring to? Yes. And Sarah Gideon was

the Democrat challenger to Collins in 2020, winning every single poll literally and Collins won by

nine points. Wow. So it's simple. Main second district up in the North is very trumpy. And Susan

Collins wins that and does better with the Bostonite voters down in the South. And they're sure there's

a lot of action. Interesting. Yeah. Well, I think that demographic of voter likes to sound like,

hey, we vote for both parties up here and we're fair. Let's let's jump to this next door. Let's talk

about black snake. We got this from out kick JK Rowling reacts to HBO's Harry Potter race swapping

controversy incorrect. She did not. She reacted to the trailer. And in response to it, someone said

the trailer for the new Harry Potter Harry Potter was bloody marbles can't wait. Neither can the rest

of the world. It's going to be incredible. I'm happy with it. She did not directly address black

snake, but I love love, love, love that they're doing this because it changes Harry Potter fundamentally

in so many ways. So Hermione Granger is going to be mixed race giving mud blood a new meaning.

And snake being black changes everything. There's this funny quote from the book where Harry Potter's

mom is like, you know, what is it about snake that, you know, you won't leave him alone? And James

Potter says it's nothing about him. Other than that, he exists. And so everybody's like, oh man,

if they follow the book to the tea, it's going to be about Harry Potter's white supremacist dad

pick on the black kid and his mom, who despite knowing the black kid her whole life refused to date him,

before it was just like childhood friends and she chose the jock instead of the nerd. Now it's a

race thing. And then the other thing it's funny is in like in the first book, they constantly

accuse snake of trying to steal the philosopher's stone, sorcerer's stone, depending on your region.

It's going to be really funny when like the kids are like, Professor Dumbledore, it's the black

guy who's trying to steal everything. And he's going to be like, no, no, that's racist. Don't say that.

It's going to be an absolute mess. I don't mind race swapping in some circumstances.

Like some people have said, Idris Albus should not be James Bond because James Bond's white. And

I'm like, no, no, no, no. Idris Albus can absolutely be James Bond. I have no, he'd be fantastic.

I don't care about his politics or whatever, but he is built. He could be a James Bond character.

I have no problem with that. I also respect people saying we want a traditional Englishman to play

James Bond to just say fair point. So I'm like, I think if you're talking about a British spy,

Idris Albus fine, but I do get why you'd rather have an Englishman who is traditionally Englishman

a white guy. But I'm not going to get all that bent on the shape. Now Ann Bolin, when they made

Ann Bolin black, I'm like, come on guys. Nobody had a problem with Nick Fury when Sam Jackson was

Nick Fury. Indeed. And they actually swapped Fury in the comics so they could get Sam Jackson

to play. Nick Fury is originally a white guy with like a buzz cut and or a flat top or whatever.

And then they actually planned this to like, hey, in the future, we want Sam Jackson to be

Nick Fury. So let's make Nick Fury in the comic black. But Sam Jackson, awesome. He's a great

Nick Fury. He was great. And that's a made up character. I will say this, make new characters.

You don't need to race swap characters. Like, they're like, let's have Iron Man be a black girl.

And okay. So they made Iron Heart really well. And it's like, at least it's kind of a new

character. You know what I mean? Like they didn't make Tony Stark one day wake up as a black girl.

Miles Morales is a parallel Spider-Man. But they actually did the parallel Spider-Man stories

so I don't really care about. I like the Miles Morales character. It's fine. But taking Snape,

who's supposed to be like a hook-nosed, pale, gangly, 30 year old and being like,

there's me with black guy. He's like an underground guy that showers every two weeks. He doesn't

get any sunlight. I also love how he's going to he desperately wants to be the defense against

the Dark Arts teacher. It's just like, there's so much buried racism that are adding to the story

by making this character black. In general question, is this a remake? Yeah, well technically yes.

Okay. Are they going to remake all some books? Well, I don't know if it's fair to call it a remake

because it's a book and they did an adaptation and they're doing another adaptation.

So the original movies deviated a bit and left a lot out. The idea is with this new HBO series,

they can keep a lot that was left out in the books in the actual story now. I'm going to be honest

with you. I am not going to watch it and I am this is I read the first book when I was a little

kid. I think I was like fourth grade where the second book right when it came out. I was eagerly

awaiting each book excited as a child. I remember when they announced like the final book will be

coming out. I remember when there was a controversy where someone standing in line at a bookstore

screamed snake kills Dumbledore and everyone started screaming video and viral. And could you

bro reading the half blood prints at the end and everybody was speculating like why did snake do it

and and there were theories. It was so much fun and then the last book came out when the

movies came out a lot of people don't understand that flight was actually a really big deal for

death eaters and at the end was like let's do it together and they jump out. It's all for the movie

and it omitted so much like a vata cadaver for instance in the books when they hit you with it

you just your life is gone and you collapse in the movies they get blasted back 20 feet in the movies

hairy cast expel the air mess which always just makes your wand fly to your hand but Draco goes flying

back 20 feet and crashes on the ground right all of that stuff. Let's see if they can stick to the

actual books that being said I can tell you all about Harry Potter because I grew up with it and

I will not watch this. I read those books over 9.11 they got me through I used to work 6 pm

to 6 am at ground zero and I would read Harry Potter all night. The great story almost everything

about that story is great I only read like six books of the seven except for that stupid game

quidditch that they play. Yes made no sense. It's the best it's the best game ever and then one guy

catches a ball in the entire game and everyone goes home. Incorrect. You clearly have not read the

books. If someone catches the golden snitch the game ends and that team wins. No incorrect.

I believe it's correct if I'm wrong it might be in book four in which they explicitly have

a quidditch match it might be five where they say we are currently down by 167 like 170 points

if you catch the snitch now we lose. Oh you'll get 150 points or so. And then the game is over

and if you are down you lose. So this meant that the rival team scored 17 goals the difference was

so great that at that point they could not catch the snitch until that least caught up a couple goals

which actually that makes it a lot better. But actually that makes it a fine game meaning

typically catching the snitch will win you the game if you do it quickly. But if you're down

way too much now you can't end the game intentionally. So it actually is an interesting strategy

than where it's like if you are losing by 15 goals you have to make up goals before you can try

and catch the snitch. Without being hyper offensive towards women like that's a sport that was

created by a girl. Why what do you mean? I mean the stupidest stupid sport where one you catch one

ball and you get 150 in the game ends and what do you mean? It's like a nonsense game. It's

a fake excitement for us. It does place a lot of responsibility on the snitch catcher. They are

on flying grooms. I know but like get rid of the snitch and the game would have been awesome.

I actually I have no problem with that as a as a as a game. I shouldn't say that about the

woman that wrote that game because she's a great writer. I really like her. I think the bigger problem

is that the whole the whole series is loaded with plot holes and things that make no sense like

and then what happens is throughout the book series it's kind of fine until you get into the

fantastic beasts where all of a sudden it's like anyone can operate and it's like okay then what's

the point of the flu network? Some people can't. Some people are she's a what is it a maledictus. She

turns into a snake. Some people can be transfigured into animals or they can choose to it. It's really

hard to and it's like huh like when Matt I turns Draco into a ferret or whatever it's like we don't

use transfigurations as punishment but it's like others have to train to be able to do it but

someone could just do it to you whatever man. Like it's fun. I love the story but there's so much

it's wrong with it. Yeah. Anyway what do we have? I think I've got some uh nope that's

particular. Where is the where the tweets on this one? Someone said just realize that when

Neville faces the boggirt it's going to look like his biggest fear is a black guy hiding in a closet.

This is just I mean it's it's that's funny. It's just so ripe for all kinds of racial jokes and

stuff. Yeah you know it's just going to make people are pointing out that the little boy who plays

here. This one looks like an old lesbian woman and I'm like I'm not going to make fun of a little kid

for you know whatever although he is toothy which is interesting um so males typically you can't see

their teeth their upper teeth. Did you guys know this? Yeah when when a man talks or smiles you usually

don't see their upper teeth for the most part but women you see a lot of it and actually some women

are called gummy because their lips are thin and they smile you can see actually the top layer of

gums. So for this little boy to be as up uh highly toothy as as he is many people are saying it's

very effeminate that's why it looks like a woman. But you know it's a little kid I'm not here to

make fun of little kids or anything like that. I thought this was an AI and they got like a little

girl that they were going to make a trans boy to be Harry Potter and they got a black snake. I

thought it was AI a parody and now it's crazy. And snake has like dreadlocks because they're like

black. They have that long hair somehow. How is he going to be snake? Is he going to talk like this?

I don't know. Talk like this. She's going to have to do what everybody else does when you have

something like this and figure out how to suspend reality. That's how you people enjoy pro wrestling

all those years. I mean I have no problem. It's a it's a story about wizards you know what I mean?

The issue is that there's a lot that is fine if it's being done to the gangly white guy and there's

a lot that's very when it's being done to the young black guy. You know like they're adding a

component of racism. The lens for which this will be using to be very, very different to a child.

Do you think people are still as up in arms about this sort of thing as they were 10 years ago?

Like race swapping or just just in general. I it seems like back on the generations.

He folks it seems like they're a little more edgy with the types of jokes and oh yeah, yeah.

Oh bro the race jokes that are flying out about this are nuts. Do the memes are going crazy.

They are going to roast this guy based on race. You like Gen Z is just done playing games in the

theater. You know I did 20 years in the theater. It was normal to race swap or gender swap didn't

matter. You know we're all having fun. You could play a black woman or a white guy. It doesn't matter

what the character who was who. But on TV it's a lot different. I think cinema and film they require

a level of realism. Generally the context matters right prior to all the woke stuff happening.

People didn't really notice like it's particularly in theater where it was a fairly

selective group of people that were going to see plays and stuff like that. Whereas nowadays with

the or at least not maybe not now, but you know from say 2013 to 2023. Like the culture in the US

was doing so much to try and try and like try and shape the opinions of people so that people

started to notice and push back. I got to say one last thing before we go to our discord chat

questions. Have you guys seen the lawsuit against the comedian for saying about Lion King song?

I just saw the video for I think up there on the screen. You guys hear this? So it's comedian.

He's from Africa I believe. And he's doing this podcast where he says they're talking about

Lion King and he's like you know that song was like he's like you know what they're saying and

like what's he saying? He's saying he goes the song says look it's a lion. Oh my god.

And they're like that's not what he's saying. He's like that's what it means. He is correct.

He's being sued because the composer says it doesn't it doesn't convey the actual regal meaning behind

it. And what he said was defamatory and now he's losing like he risk losing royalties and he's

didn't damaged. It's like a $27 million lawsuit. So I said okay I'm gonna look it up and guess

what the lyrics mean. Look there's a lion. Oh my god. The issue is the word lion also represents

royal like strength and royalty. So the it can be translated as look a great leader. Oh my god

or at the same time look a lion. Oh my god. And that's literally means and then it goes look

this a lion. Oh my god. Yes, that's a lion. I mean that guy whoever that guy who did the joke

was joking. He wasn't defaming. No, he's telling the truth. That's actually a direct translation of

what it means. And everybody here is this like Zulu cry in this powerful song and it feels majestic

and it's just living like look a lion. Oh my god. And I looked it up and it translates to

something to that effect. I never knew it meant anything. I thought they were just chanting.

Gets called another language car. Remember the song. How do we how do we pull up the chat here?

Do you guys have a song from Civ 4? You go to click on that. Oh it's right there. I see it.

That's like an African show chat. Oh it is so good. All right. Song from Civ 4. No.

This is like the song that loads when you play the game. Let's uh we're gonna grab comments

and chats. I don't know if you guys have been asking questions or not but I'm gonna just gonna read

what you guys are saying. So uh we've got this one from uh pre-mark tech. He says Tim you can

absolutely shoot firearms in the air by land mass. It is more legal to shoot into the air than not

proof duck and squirrel hunting. Uh you're using game load. You're not shooting

556 at birds. We're nine millimeter. Yeah. Uh that being said what goes up must come down and some

bullets have terminal lossy high enough to endure or kill. It is your responsibility to be safe

and accountable for every shot you fire. Indeed. Android Waza's question. Given the Chinese

bombing attempt on sent com. Do you think China directed the attack rather than solo actors?

If so was it because they feared the US solidifying global hegemoni through our recent actions or

was it perhaps it's an opportunistic shot while we're busy. I mean we did talk about it the day. I

don't know. I think it was a opportunistic. I don't think the C.C. because if they it's just some

people some crazy. I know but what was the opportunity? Curt the enemy hurt them. You know get them

really get them where they hurt but I don't know what they're like but again like I have a feeling

that if the C.C.P. instructed that that would be the beginning of their downfall. They don't want

to start a war with the world because that is if they attack the United States that does trigger

article five. They do those kind of things all the time. They've introduced blights into the United

States to destroy crops. They've done all kinds of stuff that that can't be directly tied to

them or wouldn't be considered a direct attack but they do this kind of stuff frequent. I

should clarify. I don't think there will be any direct connection found. Well maybe there was but

I don't think they're going to have any kind of paper trail or did. Of course. There's no benefit

from some random Chinese national planning a bomb. There's a benefit from the Chinese government.

What's that? There's a benefit to Chinese government. There's not really benefit to any of these

idiots doing street crime except they just they think that they're. Rob is his terror. This was

attempted bombing of a military base of Sankhan which greatly benefits China as a government.

So, why would the Long Island do it? Ideological I guess or the chaos of the point.

Right. Like the point of it is to just to so chaos in the United States. It's not like they're

like strategically saying, hey, this is going to take out the base. They want to so chaos because

what they want is the the American people to be fighting with each other about what to do. If there

was an American in China that set off a bomb near one of their buildings and then fled to the US,

that would have been an international incident. So, I just don't think that the Chinese would do it.

That's why because I can't imagine our government doing it that overtly. Yeah, I think I agree with

you on that. I don't think there's any risk of trying to kick something off on a bigger scale like

that. So, but China is definitely going to be feeling the heat with with Venezuela and Iran operations.

Hellbilly says Phil, do a desk pop. No. Where I shoot your gun at your desk. Yeah, what was that

from? Was that like Reno 911 or something? The wrong guys. The wrong guys. Right, right, right,

a desk pop. Oh, I'm not doing a desk pop. Don't be secret service agent. Shot himself, I guess.

Yeah. Well, it is. No, Jill Biden. No, negligent discharge. All right. Hades says two questions.

Perhaps we can address SB 1071 in West Virginia and how the president of your Senate killed it.

What are you doing to advance it? Like getting it added to HB 4185. Canada just made quoting the

Bible hate speech. What's the best way to resist that insane law? SB 1071, of course, it was at the

machine gun one. I don't know. Probably I think it's the bill to amend the code adding designated

blah, blah, blah. I don't know enough about why they blocked it. I think we were talking about it

when they were introducing it though, but I don't know. I have to follow up on it. Sorry, no good answer.

Humans are cool, man. We built law. How do you? How do you get around the Bible as hate speech in

Canada? I have no idea. Can't you just don't have free speech, so I don't know. Oh, I got it.

Figure it out. Read the Bible in Arabic. So you're actually preaching the gospel of Christ,

but in Arabic, and then if they challenge you, be like, whoa, whoa, don't you know which one

I'm preaching? And then they're like, uh-oh, what if it's Islam? Can't arrest them for it?

But it was Christianity the whole time. Protected speech when it's... I mean, remember when people

would draw the arch of the fish with their feet because if you were a Christian, they'd kill you.

Is it Abraham, the real one, like the real prophet? He's OG. Yeah. What does that mean?

The real prophet? Jesus, Mohammed, like, let's just go back to Abraham. Let's all get down with Abraham.

That's the Jews. Yeah, but they're all in a moment. And then Jesus is the Messiah who came to fulfill

the promise and saved a fallen world and, you know, all that stuff. I want to lift up Abraham

for a little while and then Christians like him too. But then Jesus came and he's the Messiah.

I don't believe that. I'm going to lift up this. And it's totally different religion.

The Muslims believe that Jesus was a prophet who will come back and expose all the Christians as false

worshipers. I'm surprised that Abraham doesn't get it more because like, Judah came along and like

must have been really badass actually. Judah, you know, Jacob's son. They named the tribe after him.

Yeah. I think it's funny how people are referring to these two factions of Charlie Kirk supporters

as the Sunni, Kirk's or the Shia Kirk supporters because I made this joke where I said I'm launching

a new debate show. But instead of debating, it's just me and another person pulling up texts,

Charlie Kirk sent us to justify our positions. And then, you know, Pusobic was like Sunni,

Kirk versus Shia Kirk, which is like, basically it. But that's all everyone's doing.

Like, all of these personnel are like, you know, Charlie Kirk said to me, this thing that proves

my point. And then Sanos goes, well, Charlie Kirk said to me, this thing that proves my point.

They're people posting clips of Charlie Kirk after the 12-day war saying I stand with Trump on

this war. And then there are other people pulling up clips from before the war saying no war with

Iran. And I'm like, what are we, what are we, what are we doing? You can, you can like have the

opinion before the war started. You can, you can easily say, I think it's a bad idea to start a war

with Iran. And then when the war starts, say, well, this is the reality we're living in. So I hope

that the results of the war are the best for the United States. That's totally consistent.

Well, 100%. A lot of people are getting ahead of, I'm not saying that just like you, you know,

I think that there's good reasons before it all kicked off. But when, when people are really

doom casting about what's going on in Iran right now, then they're looking at remembering

Afghanistan in Iraq, the fourth Infantry Division's camped out in hard stand buildings for a nine

or 12-month deployment cycle, even went up to 15 months at some time. And you had, had contractors

there making three times what the green suitors were making. People are looking back at that.

And really to run everything back to what we talked about earlier, all throughout history,

counterinsurances have been massive failures, unless they're on islands. And you can use the

Navy to cut off the flow of personnel and arms, divide the population and destroy the enemy.

So Iran is different than Iraq. It's number one, it's four times the geographic size of Iraq.

Population is about double. And you have massive terrain advantages for any force that is

trying to defend. I think the only hope for bringing things to a legitimate regime change

would be for the local nations or for the locals to be able to displace that government.

Because we're not going to be able to do it. And I don't even think President Trump would do

that. I do think we have special operators in country for sure. I do think they'll take

Corga Island, but I don't see a massive conventional operation. There's just too many people.

Do you think the Israelis will instigate anything? They won't put anybody on the ground.

Because I think yesterday I was talking about NATO, I was like a defensive pact. And I was like,

it's not a military alliance. And I was like, oh, we're in a military alliance with Israel.

If one of us attacks, the other one automatically is attacked. We are also in a military alliance

with NATO. No, not an attack. That's a defensive pact. It's different than a military alliance.

It's plasive. I mean, it's I'm just calling it from civ a defensive pact only triggers on

if one of them is attacked. You're calling it a video game. Military alliance is trigger when one

of them goes to war aggressively. And we fund their militaries. I'm not denying that.

Right. That's Israel and the US. The fact of have a military alliance. Our military alliance with

European nations is that we are funding their militaries. We have expectations on their return

via GDP. If they have to pay back. I mean, if there's that, it's a writing. So like in Libya,

for instance, we we used France to go in and bomb the crap out of these people.

That is our military alliance with European nations. We obviously are allied with European nations

for war. Well, Europe suddenly cares now because the Iranians can hit to you or see.

All right. Which means they can hit Europe. Oops. Yeah. Let's let's let's grab this question.

We've got who do we have here? We got the Taylor Lorenz is what does that say? I can't read. It's

all weird. Atrazine. Some maxim. I'm referring to your Trump one segment today as someone who

fell into a bit of a lack of enthusiasm. I'm all gas. No breaks on Trump stand up versus bricks.

Do you think if Trump wins here that he can fulfill the question in the remaining two years?

Or will a pro NWO dem just reverse it all in 2028? I think if Trump succeeds, the tide will

have shifted so dramatically that nothing's going to stop it. Yeah. That's why this is Trump's gambit.

The move on Iran. If he wins here, he wins the board. Not that the bad, not that everything's over,

but it puts him to a point where there is just not enough resource on the other side to push him

back down. It's all downhill from there. All easy. And also that if he does produce the,

if he wins, the results for the American population are going to be very noticeable.

If you say this war ends, say just for a day, say it's in July, right? And then you're out of

Iran. You don't have a lingering, large force. And then the US starts to see real benefits from

the oil that is being purchased from the US. You see real economic benefit. The American people

are going to be like, okay, this is actually been good for us. Obviously, there are a ton of

ways that it can go wrong. And I'm not saying that it's definitely going to go right. But this

in conjunction with what this will do to our position or for our position regarding China is a

big deal. And it'll pay dividends for the American people in the long term. And if the American

people see that, then they're going to be like, okay, well, this is actually a good move.

It's positioned us better. We're not as concerned with an imminent dollar crash because we've

just propped up the petrodollar and stuff. So it could result in, and again, I'm not saying it

will. I'm saying that it could result in very, very positive things with the American people.

What we need to do, obviously, is to build a flying city that can carry all of our armaments and

troops that goes over any of our enemies and destroys them to prevent any opportunity.

And we'll do a domestic one. It'll be Amazon Drone Delivery Blimp first. And then we'll

weaponize it. If anybody knows what reference I'm making in the prize.

There's only one, there's only one consistent video game reference I make on this show all the time.

Oh, you're talking about video game. I was thinking of the big carriers that are in marvel.

I'll give you a hint. Would you kindly? Oh, oh, buy a shot. I didn't get to that. Which that's

only a half answer. Buy a shot only have buy a shot one. Incorrect. It's two. Incorrect.

Really? How many buy a shot? We're there. There are many. Buy a shot. Infinite. Where a city is

America built a flying city, which goes over China and puts down the box of rebellion.

Guys, learn your video game lore. Come on. I'm so down to buy a shot. One was so good.

Awesome. Infinite's okay. It's fine. Booker catch. But buy a shot one. Just epic.

It needs to be so power. The flying city is like shooting a mountain with a rocket.

Like it just has that little impact on the flying city. Otherwise, it's coming down.

I think buy a shot one should be mandatory high school curriculum.

Yeah. I mean, it's pro capitalism. Maybe the food fighters too. Well, actually, I think it's

kind of anti-capitalism. The whole point was that they were doing what the Atlas shrug thing.

They were like the people were leaving. The story of buy a shot is that wealthy people built a city

underwater to escape repressive government in Texas and then started capitalism was so rampant

that genetic engineering became commonplace, which resulted in people going psychotic as they

became splicers. Without regulations or checks, the genetic engineering made everyone go insane.

And the civilization collapses. And you go there and everything's falling apart. It was very

anti-capitalism. It's just still a great story and it's fun. And I recommend it. And also,

when you don't have to kill a little girls and drain what you call it from them, it's been so long

as I played it. I don't know what the essence is called. Adam or something? I think it might

Eve. Is that what is Eve? Maybe it was. I don't remember. I've only played it for like 10 minutes.

Oh, that's for me, dude. It maxed difficult. I played it again like four times.

And I would like run circles around Atlas. And the final boss is literally Atlas. It's hilarious.

So good. And you get the, you get the, what's it called? It's been so long as I played it,

and you get into your arm. And then fire drain Adam from the little sister. Adam, that's right. Yeah.

You said Adam away. Yeah. And then it makes you stronger, but only a little bit. You know, you get

like a bad ending for killing them all. And uh, uh, plasmids. That's what it was. And then

an infinite there like, no, no, no, we don't want to do injections in the arm anymore. So we're

going to make it a soda pop and you get a bottle and crack it and drink it. And I was like, boring.

Gay. You think a flying, a flying, a flying mother shit makes a lot of sense for the modern

warfare, uh, the, the, the helicopter here from Avengers. That's why I thought you were talking

about it. You launched three of them. And then you shoot everybody who deviates via algorithm.

That was winter soldier. All right. Let's read this question for the panel. Ian, if no fault

marriage is a good thing, then what is the point of marriage? No fault marriage has destroyed

society, created single parent households that ultimately contributed to the downfall of

Western society. Brett and I have only been married almost seven months, but I could honestly say

I am a better person because of it. And he would say the same from Olivia. Um, the point of marriage,

like no fault divorce marriage is that while you're married, you can still do all the married things.

Like share money, primarily share money. I'm not sure why no fault divorce has anything to do

with that. Well, whether or not, why don't you just start an LLC to hold your revenue and you

get to do the same thing. What's that? You could just start an LLC do the same thing.

Hey, there's the same. I'd have to look at the contracts and see the difference. The LLC holds

the revenue and both individuals are allowed to spend money as to the benefit of the LLC.

There's breaking more trust for the record. I don't like breaking news. Yeah. Tiger was gotten

to another car crash. It's about time. I've been with roll over car crashing cheaper Florida.

I don't like no fault divorce, but even some of the most conservative people I've talked to about

it are like you have to let women escape abusive relationships because they could not

not know what we said. That's not no fault divorce. Ian, that's not no fault divorce. That is

part of the value. No, it is incorrect. No fault divorces that you can lead. Incorrect. Marriage

was always allowed to be dissolved pre no fault divorce if there was a beef. If you could prove it.

And still today, you have to prove. What do you mean? Did you hear what I said though? Yes.

Back in the day, women couldn't prove it. You still have to prove it today. You can just

divorce today. Yes, but you can't get access to anything you own unless you can prove it.

You need to prove fault if you want to take resources. Okay, but I'm not talking about

taking resources. And why get married if you don't want the resources? That was your point.

To be with someone you love. You can just do that. But I'm talking about people leaving a violent

relationship that they can't prove is violent. Then you don't get resources. So what was the point?

Your point was getting married allows you to share money. And you do while you're married.

And the guy starts beating you, you leave. And if you can't prove it, maybe you don't get

the money. Well, you get your life. So you could always, what do you talk like you could always do

that? If you're stuck in a marriage with an abuse of husband, no, you could still leave even if

you're married. If you can't prove it, you row. No one is obligating married couple to live

in the same house. You could leave. I'm saying if there is a, you have to prove fault, but you still do.

You say in no fault divorce, you still have to prove fault. You get the money that you say you want.

Getting the money. I'm talking about ending the relationship. The question I have is what was the

point of getting married? To split resources. And you can't split those resources unless you can

prove abuse. You can't split those resources if you're getting the shit kicked out of you either.

If you can't prove a crime, it's, you're always required to prove a crime for standing.

For not talking about charging the other crime and talking about ending a marriage. I'm talking

about getting rights to what is yours. So your argument is change the goalpost and better off

that women leave destitute if they can't prove it. And I'm like, then nothing has changed.

It's better for a woman to escape with her life than to get stuck in a violent abuse of

relationship. Okay, Ian, I got to pause you. In my opinion, before no fault divorce, women could

still leave and go somewhere else to avoid being beaten. But they had to prove it. No, they didn't.

Then how did they leave? They got on their feet and walked. Then they're like breaking the law.

No, I can't. No, they're not. And didn't bring them home. No, they can't. That didn't exist.

What are you talking about? A woman, you're saying a man's wife could just

disappear legally. Yes, she could. With no. Yes, she's getting beaten. The only issue was she

couldn't get access to resource unless she could prove it, which is the same today. The issue with

no fault divorce is that marriages have become dating. I don't think she could even file for

divorce before unless she had proof for a reason. You would go to court and you and you would say,

here's what I want to do. And this is still true today to a certain extent. But you don't need

fault. You can say irreconcilable differences. So what they added is irreconcilable differences.

And with that, you can get married. And then a year later, the one can be like, now I get half

your stuff. No, it's awful. Indeed. You're going to prenups, not sitting stone. Exactly.

So no fault divorce is a huge problem for a variety of reasons.

I know. That's what my argument was. And usually is. But the people that are like, yo,

they're women. We're getting like, you got to understand what women were going through before.

That's, but again, this is this is feminist propaganda. It's not true.

It's women that work with abuse. You always need to prove fault today, yesterday or otherwise.

And they claim women were being beaten. It's like, if a woman was being beaten, she'd go to the police.

And that would dissolve the marriage. The issue of no fault divorce is that women can leave if

they're not being beaten. That's the argument. So if your argument is women and abusive

relationships should be allowed to leave, I'll greed. How about then we create a circumstance

by which it's easier to prove. So women have an easier time to end marriages with fault.

And instead of creating a blanket, you can dissolve your marriage and take the guy's stuff.

We say no to that. Right. Make it easier to prove fault. That'd be interesting. I mean,

we do have cell phone cameras. Like if your guy's a bit psychologically abusing. So then we don't

need no fault divorce anymore because we have cell phone cameras. We have forensic studies. You

can go and get a medical exam and prove it. Well, there's also psychological abuse. Yeah,

but if you can record it and prove it in a court, what is psychological abuse? Like,

I mean, it's think it's kind of self-evident. No, no, no, but what like it's like her cry every

night, make her think she's less than human, make her feel like she's the reason of all the problems

in your life. What is that illegal? No, it's abusive, though. Okay. Once again, legal and it

should be grounds for terminating. I completely disagree. Psychological abuse. That's

something to do with a psychopath that's psychologically busy. You shouldn't be able to divorce.

Well, I guess there's a gradient there because again, I asked you to define it and you said

I gave you three insulting you and I said no to that. I didn't say insulting you. Like

constantly telling you you're not worth it. Yeah, it's like insulting you. Yeah, making you feel

less than human. Well, how you feel is not anyone else's fault but your own. Right, except when

the fist hits like, oh, yeah, it's a fist. I talk to physical. Everything you're feeling is

because of you. I do agree with that at one level. But if someone's standing five feet away from

you screaming at you, you might, no, no, that's something and say a psychological abuse. That's

assault. Or if they're leaving you notes or whatever. Yeah, just throw them away.

Just ignore your husband. Like, don't come on to him. Come on, bro. No, no. If you're arguing

exactly, man, we're arguing that if you enter into a death contract, you can't break it without

cause. And someone being mean is not cause. Screaming in someone's face is actually assault and

potentially battery. Now you're talking about physical abuse. But if someone, if you let go the

screaming aspect of it, just use that screaming. I said, no, yeah, well, I said, no,

things to someone over and over. That's not grounds too bad. That's that would be horrible.

That's too bad. You do not get to take no one's going to follow you to that psycho future dude.

You do not get to take someone's money half their income because they're mean. Sorry.

I'm open to fixing that part of the no fault. That's the worst part of no fault. The

worst is that a guy can get married a week later. She can leave with half his worth. Not a

weird. The judge wouldn't allow it usually. Okay. Then whatever. So but like six months to a year

sometimes, yeah, nuts. And so that's why they have enolments, which void the marriage citing it as

just not real. So the issue is someone says he was mean to me. I should get his stuff and we

should get a divorce. Like, no, sorry. I think the issue is these problems arise because of no

fault divorce. It used to be very serious. If you're getting married, you better damn well mean it.

And then they said, no, no, don't worry. If you get married, you can leave. Now marriage is

dating. Anyway, my friends, we are about overtime. This is a lot of fun. It's been great having

you, man. Appreciate it. I definitely appreciate it sitting here with you guys and being able to talk

about everything that's going on in the world today. I appreciate the the constant debates in.

I always have a good time. You too, man. Everybody afterwards like, man, Tim and Ian, don't

we get along so well having fun. Yeah, I like you more after we do that. It hurts sometimes,

but like, so does working out. Yeah. I mean, the point of it is to have a thought provoking

and entertaining conversation. So my friends, smash the like button, share the show with everyone

you've met in your life. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. Good sir, would you like

to shut anything up before we go? Yeah. Well, look, everybody. You have a have a role to play

and shape in the conversations in the world we live in. I've been fighting the fight for election

integrity. Obviously, it's a it's an important thing for me to stay involved as well. So thank you

for having me on. You can follow me at capandk.us or check out my new book, The American War on

Election Corruption. So thank you very much. I like what you do with the election there.

Oh, it's a it's a number one best seller in three Amazon categories. And we call that the F curve,

the miraculous changing of the guard on November three four five six and seven of 2020.

That was a good day. Hey, I'm at Ian Cross and follow me at Ian Cross on the internet. And I don't

have anything to jam out right now because I've got a graphene.movie and sign up for the on the

waiting list to get the movie to get access to the movie when it goes live. It's a documentary made

down in Rice University Carter banks. Dude, I can't wait to see it when it comes out. I'm Carter

Banks. You can follow me at Carter Banks everywhere and our label at trash house records on YouTube.

Thank you for coming out. Man, it's been a pleasure talking to you. Phil.

I am Philip remains on Twix. You can check out a new piece that I wrote on my Patreon.

It's about Spruce Pine, the little town where the all of the silicone that goes into all of the

the chips that we use every day, the crucibles, all that stuff is made. It's basically the only

place in the world that has has courts this cure this pure. You can check it out at Philip remains

on Patreon. The band is all that remains. We're going on tour this spring with dead eyes and

Bournable Cyrus. We start April 29th in Albany. You can get tickets at all the remains online.com.

You can check out all the remains. Music at Apple Music, Amazon Music Pandora, YouTube Spotify,

and Deezer. Don't forget the left lane is for crime. All right, everybody. Thanks for hanging out.

It's been a great week. We're back, of course, next week. We're going to a lot of interesting things.

We're actually working on setting up digital guests because there are a lot of high-profile people

like the West Coast, for instance. They don't like traveling. We've got a bunch of stuff in the works.

And it's all possible thanks to you. So join our discord community at timcast.com. Don't miss it.

Thanks for hanging out. We'll see you all next time.