From Washington: Ethics Fight Presents Conundrum for Democrats

That's pure automotive joy.

I'm Peter, the owner of Muscle Car Junior.

It started as a hobby, then I started posting about it.

Before I knew it, I built a business for storing muscle cars on Facebook Marketplace,

and the community of car lovers on Instagram.

Today, new customers send me what's that message is from all over.

Not bad for a hobby.

And how meta helps over 35 million American businesses, like Peter's Grow, at meta.com-slash-community.

In 2024, a truck crashed into Cannot in Morescu, where I work.

146 of our dogs needed homes fast.

We asked for help on Facebook.

Our story spread through WhatsApp messages and Instagram reposts.

Immediately, people stepped up.

And just six hours later, every dog was fostered.

I'll never forget how our community showed up for us.

Learn how over 3.5 billion people connect to what matters with meta, at meta.com-slash-community.

Saturday, March 28th, 2026, I'm Jessica Brosenthal.

Could a Florida representative soon be expelled from Congress?

An ethics subcommittee has found one member violated house rules ahead of federal criminal

proceedings.

They talk a lot the Democrats do about what they see as corruption with President Trump

and people in the Trump administration.

And then when they see something like this, if there are people who are not willing to

expel her or punish her or censor her or whatever it might be, that's a problem.

Is regime change coming to Cuba?

President Trump calls it a failed nation.

With talks ongoing with the Cuban leader, who is now offering to open the country up

to foreign investment.

It's all about money.

Time is down.

Oil is gone.

Havana clearly needs money.

And we have to get a reality check.

This is the Fox News rundown from Washington.

This week a House Ethics Subcommittee heard evidence against Florida Congresswoman Sheila

Sherfellis McCormick accused of failing to return a more than $5 million FEMA overpayment

to her family's health care company during COVID.

The previous year she received $86,000 and the following two years she received $6.7 million.

That's correct.

Mississippi Congressman Michael Gas questioned House attorney's evidence against Sherfellis

McCormick.

And then from those different accounts, from her personal money that she received of

the $2.3 million from the SMC consultant and then from the E.C. firm, much of that money

then flowed into her campaign.

Correct.

Sherfellis McCormick has denied wrongdoing and pled not guilty in a federal criminal case

out of Florida.

A head of the Subcommittee hearing, her attorney William Barzi, said even holding the hearing

ran the risk of violating her constitutional rights ahead of her trial.

It makes sense if there is a pending criminal case that this committee should just simply

pause.

Wow, the criminal case to work itself out so that there is no risk of tainting a jury.

But the Subcommittee found she violated 25 of the 27 ethics charges against her and there

is discussion about possible expulsion from the House.

Minority Leader Huckim Jeffries was asked about that possibility.

Congresswoman Sherfellis McCormick is entitled to the presumption of innocence like every

other American.

I'm a hard no as it relates to the effort to expel her.

And it's going to fail.

Either way, her district in Florida is considered a safe democratic seat.

In short, this means that she broke house rules and she brought, you know, unbecoming conduct

on her and the House of Representatives.

Fox News Chief Congressional Corresponded Chad Program.

In this investigative subcommittee, that's kind of like a grand jury, essentially, you

know, the Constitution says that the House of Representatives and the Senate, you know,

has authority to adjudicate and certain judgment of its own members and that's what's

happened here.

The process in the House is that you basically, if they think that there is enough there

there after they do a preliminary investigation, they would do a investigative subcommittee,

which is, I say, that grand jury and then kick it up to the next level.

Here they had put out some weeks ago a report that said that they thought that she had

violated all these house rules and probably broke the law, although they were very careful

about that.

And there's one particular instance I'll get into with that.

But the idea that she has been charged criminally in Florida and has a trial probably

later this summer, where she's accused of embezzling some $5 million of COVID aid from

the pandemic.

So there was a lot of back and forth in this open trial, which is where you're allowed

to come and present your case, present evidence, present witnesses.

She kind of sort of did that.

We had not had an ethics trial like this in 16 years in the House of Representatives.

The last one was the late Charlie Wrangle from New York, who was the chairman of the Ways

and Means Committee, and he kind of came and defended himself, almost on his own.

In fact, it was kind of a funny story one morning.

There was a big kerfuffle about Wrangle and whether or not he should go before the ethics

committee.

And one early one morning, I was coming into the Capitol and I was in the basement.

I ran into his aide, Emil Milne, who had a big envelope for him, and I was by the ethics

committee.

And he said, I said, oh, I said, I said, what's in the big envelope?

And he said, it's for the ethics committee.

And I said, I said, well, are you taken to the ethics committee?

He said, I can.

He said, but I don't know where they are.

And I said, well, I can help you out with that.

So I walked him over to the ethics committee and I used to joke with Charlie Wrangle.

I said, don't ever let you think that Fox News didn't do any favor.

He actually thought that was pretty funny later.

But anyway, so because they did find him basically guilty of breaking house rules and what

they did eventually was the full house voted to censor him, which is the second most

serious form of punishment in the House.

Now with the Sheila Scherfelist McCormick, it has been suggested that maybe she be expelled

now, just the House of Representatives has only expelled six people.

But she did not speak during her hearing.

She did not present witnesses.

There was questioning by the ethics committee members of her and also the House investigators.

But she did not present any defense herself.

And then they basically came out on Friday and said, yes, we think that that your guilty

is as charged.

And the crux of this and you touched on it in terms of the evidence is that her family's

healthcare company received a essentially a $5 million overpayment in COVID relief money

that there was a, I guess an accounting error and the zeros were too many zeros added

on and she kept it, but she's accused of keeping it.

But then on top of that funneling some of it to the congressional campaign, when we heard

the evidence that the Congress members were talking about during the hearing, did anything

stick out at you?

I think at one point it was Brad Nott, who was reading text messages from her saying

that this looks very damning.

Yeah.

And I think that was it, that she has tried to say maybe that it was on staff or something

like that.

But that's why they brought this all the way up to that level with the full ethics committee

because they thought there was some pretty direct evidence that she knew what was going

on.

And when you don't really offer your own defense there in the committee because you

would have faced direct questions, I thought it was very interesting that her attorney, William

Bezel, who we had not heard from before, he had only been her attorney for a couple of

weeks.

And one of the reasons that they did this a couple of days ago was that she kept burning

through attorneys and the ethics committee thought that they were kind of being strong

along.

And so they said, we have to get this wrapped up and why do we have to get it wrapped

up because there's something on Capitol Hill just that's called a blackout period.

There will be a primary election coming up very soon.

And there's about 90 days of a window that you can't deal with ethics matters related

to that.

And so they're like, wait a minute, we get into that blackout period and we can't move

because the idea that you could bring ethics charges and do investigations and throw people

under the bus before primary, before a general election.

So they try to wrap this up well ahead of time.

And so I think that was significant, the timing, they try to work on this.

Just because the House of Representatives and the ethics committee, just in this case,

has found her guilty.

This has not gone all the way to the House floor.

The full house has to do this.

And so probably in a week or two or probably after this recess, they will come up and recommend

punishment.

And as I say, that could be a fine, it could be reprimanded, it could be expulsion.

You know, it's pretty rare.

What are the odds, Chad?

What are the odds?

Yeah.

What are the odds she has expelled?

It seems higher.

When I pressed this question to House Speaker Mike Johnson the other day, I said, are they

starting to use expulsion more than they usually would because if you'd only, you know, thrown

out five House members in the history of the Republic until, you know, 2023 and then

conceivably you do two in a two and a half year period, what's the trend?

And we've seen that with censure, which is what Charlie Wrangle got that they've done

probably seven or eight of those.

And there have only been about 40 some of those in the history of the Republic.

So yeah, the odds seem pretty high and this, but I have to note that this is a high bar.

It takes two thirds in the House.

So it's really high.

It's not a simple majority.

Greg Stuby, who is a Republican from Florida, has already introduced a resolution to expel

her regardless.

And he thought that should be the case.

And they also think that Democrats are maybe talking out of both sides of their mouth.

They talk a lot.

The Democrats do about what they see as corruption with President Trump and people in the Trump

administration.

And then when they see something like this, if there are people who are not willing to

expel her or punish her or censure her or whatever it might be, that's a problem.

How Kim Jeffery is the Democratic leader has tried to stay away from this as much as

he can.

He was asked a question by a reporter about this and immediately said, next question,

he wouldn't even respond.

I was speaking to Joyce Beatty, who is a Democratic congresswoman from Ohio and she used

to be the chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus.

When she came into the room, there are only two other members there who kind of sat in

the audience besides the Congresswoman from Florida and then the ethics committee members

and one was Joyce Beatty, the other one was Jasmine Crockett.

And so I went up to Beatty and I said, I presume, perhaps incorrectly, that she was there

in support.

And I said, could I have you come out and do an interview with me?

And she said, no, she said, I'm just here to listen.

She said, I haven't made up my mind about this.

This is where this is also kind of infused with Congressional Black Caucus politics.

Shurveless McCormick has said that this is kind of an effort to get her a minority.

The CBC has not taken an official position.

This is where maybe Huckim Jeffries, of course, as a member of the CBC, but also speaks

for all House Democrats is walking the fine line.

There are other Democrats in the caucus who think that his leadership on this issue has

not been forceful enough to come out and say, yes, you need to go Congresswoman or you

need to resign or whatever it is because they think it looks, this looks so bad that

it's rather, you know, cut and dry that they're kind of playing both sides of the street

with this.

Now to have the argument from her attorney ahead of time was let the criminal trial

or proceedings play out in Florida before holding this hearing as it contained a jury

pool and some Republican members were almost offended by that.

Is it possible that this goes to the full House or a fuller decision is made after criminal

proceedings or would that just take too long?

It would take too long.

It's probably going to be well before her attorney said during the hearing that they probably

expected that to come that trial sometime in the summer, maybe take about two weeks, maybe

be wrapped up by late summer.

And again, you get into that blackout period for the House of Representatives.

You see, there's always these ways to get around this.

So that's something important to watch.

And then you bob and weave and then you can never kind of nail people down.

So that's an issue.

And I think that, you know, there are other cases that come up that maybe aren't as serious.

There are other cases that come up that have a little more, you know, it's not as black

and white necessarily.

You know, and I think about the case, you know, with George Santos, you know, the criticism

there was that, you know, usually what the ethics committee has done.

And there's anomalies here is they defer to the Department of Justice if you are being

criminally prosecuted.

So that's a change here, you know, certainly with with with the shirtless McCormick and

and George Santos, you know, he had not been tried in court yet.

And so a lot of people think that maybe they they did him wrong, Jim Traffickant, who

was the Democrat from Ohio, who was the last one who they kicked out.

This was in 2002.

He would not resign after after he had been convicted.

And so they they moved to kick him out on ever forget the line from his, his during

his ethics committee hearing and again, a guy who kind of came to defend himself.

And and Traffickant was kind of a contancress character to start with, you know, he had this

shock of white hair.

It looked like it was combed with a mixed master, but this was kind of classic Jim Traffickant.

He's coming down the hall and there's a failanks of reporters, including yours truly

there.

He yells, he goes, get out of my way or I'll kick you and give you a hernia from here

to New Jersey.

So that was kind of Jim Jim Traffickant.

So it seems as though at very least we have very colorful people who go before the ethics

committee and what they say to the press corps.

That's maybe that's why it gets them in trouble.

I don't know, Jess.

Finally, Chad, on this on this topic, you've noted the rarity of House ethics investigations,

whether or not they result in insensure or full expulsion.

And that's good, I suppose, right?

Does that those speak to the need for evidence needing to be overwhelming or that we generally

have well-behaved members of Congress?

I think it's also, you know, you want the body and the founders intended this.

If you look at the intent of the clause and the constitution that talks about them making

their own rules and being able to sit in judgment of their members and decide the membership

of the body, that's important right there.

That's kind of how it's phrased to some degree.

But you don't want other people an outside group weighing in because then it would just

be political or you potentially undo an election.

I mean, this was the case with Charlie Rangel's predecessor, by the way, if we want to keep

going down this road.

Yeah.

No, I mean, there's commonalities here too.

I mean, even Sheila Scherfelist McCormick, I mean, her predecessor was Alcy Hastings,

who was a federal judge and was firmly prosecuted and then was actually impeached and removed

from the federal bench and then served in Congress for years, was elected after he was

exonerated in court.

So anyway, so look at some of these districts.

What Charlie Rangel's predecessor was Adam Clayton Powell and this is a fascinating case.

So he was a committee chairman had been in Congress for decades and was under investigation

and he was re-elected in the late 1960s and because of the investigation, the speaker

of the House John McCormick elected, again, under that clause in the constitution, not

to seat him.

And there is a famous Supreme Court case, Powell versus McCormick, Adam Clayton Powell versus

John McCormick, the speaker of the House.

And what the court basically ruled is that you can't undo an election or you shouldn't

undo an election.

The idea that you were taking away people's votes.

And so the reason I tell you this story, so then they went forth and they seated, you

know, Adam Clayton Powell then and then Charlie Rangel came around to the next Congress.

So the idea that you want the institution, you want the body, you want their peers to

judge them because when it gets outside of the body, you have the potential in Powell versus

McCormick to undo an election, which is what the concern was there that the speaker of

the House elected not to seat him in the new Congress even though he had been a member

for years because you were undoing that or if you were to have an outside group do this,

you're also disenfranchising people.

You know, I voted for congressman so and so why is my vote not being spoken?

And so that's why that's another reason for good or bad, why ethics committee investigations

are rare and getting to this point, frankly, is a little bit rare too.

Yeah, I think we heard that name dropped, that court name dropped during the Santos matter

as well.

Yeah, absolutely.

And you know, it was another interesting dynamic in that ethics committee hearing Elijah

Manley sat behind shirtless McCormick.

He is running against her in his primary, in the primary.

He flew up from Florida and and and and he was, if you look at the video, sitting behind

the attorney William Barzi, there he is, you know, so he got some press out of this.

Somebody asked me was that good for him.

I said, I came around the corner and he was being interviewed by a reporter from the Hill

News paper and then he was on C-SPAN and our network and everybody else's network who

took some of the hearing live, I'm like, that's a pretty good political move.

Yeah, Chad program, thanks as always for your insight.

Appreciate it.

Thank you.

I've been thinking about all the ways I show up for my family every day, working hard,

planning ahead, doing everything I can to protect them.

And it hit me.

I also need a plan for the times where I can't be there.

That's why I'm telling you about fabric by Gerber Life.

He was built for busy parents who need term life insurance quickly and easily.

Without the hassle, if you've been putting it off, you're not alone.

Over two thirds of Americans overestimate the cost of life insurance, but it's more affordable

than you think.

And with fabric, you can apply online on your schedule right from your couch.

You could be covered in under 10 minutes with no health exam required.

If you've got kids, especially if you're young and healthy, now's the time to lock

in low rates.

And even if you have coverage through work, it may not be enough.

And it might not follow you if you leave your job.

Join the thousands of parents who trust fabric to help protect their families.

Apply today at meatfabric.com slash rundown.

That's meatfabric.com slash rundown.

M-E-E-T fabric.com slash rundown.

Policies issued by Western Southern Life Assurance Company, not available in certain

states, prices subject to underwriting and health questions.

Life is getting harder in Cuba.

There are fuel shortages and power blackouts.

Now that Venezuela has been cut off and Russia has been really curtailed, then they find

themselves in the situation that nobody, they don't have a sugar daddy anymore, and so

they can't maintain their economy because it doesn't work.

That's Republican Congressman Carlos Jimenez was born in Cuba, but his family fled to

Florida when the communist regime came into power.

It's a failed nation.

They have no money.

They have no oil.

They have nothing.

President Trump has essentially cut off Cuba's foreign oil supply with threats to put

tariffs on any country that supplies it.

And the other day, Fox's Peter Ducey asked the president,

It's Cuba, whatever you do with the military there, it seems like something.

Well, that look more like a random or that as well.

Can't tell you that I can tell you that they're talking to us.

But we don't know much about those US Cuba talks.

At the same time, something historic is happening, right?

The situation in Cuba is just worsening.

On Draylon Aras is an anchor for Fox Noticias, which airs at 4 p.m. Eastern on Fox Deportes.

And it's on the Fox Noticias YouTube channel.

We spoke earlier this week on the Fox News rundown.

And sometimes when I talk about this with people, they say, but it's been bad all along.

It's been 67 years of this.

But you have to have all the pieces of the puzzle, like the stars aligned for this moment

to potentially happen.

And I'm referring to this possible regime change or the collapse that President Donald

Trump has been talking so much about.

And why do I say this?

This is what's been taking place.

No oil imports in three months.

This has been happening ever since President Trump.

And the United States conducted this operation in Venezuela to capture Nicolas Maduro.

And we know that Venezuela was Cuba's lifeline.

So Cuba has not been receiving oil.

There have been already three blackouts in just a month, leaving about 11 million people

in complete darkness.

At the same time, this maximum pressure being applied by the Trump administration.

The island is now not just economically isolated, but also diplomatically isolated.

And I say this because we are also seeing an ideological shift to the right in the region.

Many conservative leaders in Latin America are strengthening their cooperation with Washington.

We just saw this during the Shield of the America's summit.

And Ecuador, for example, just recently expelled Cuba's ambassador in their capital city in

Keto and expelled the rest of the diplomatic personnel.

Costa Rica was the most recent one to take this action as well.

They closed its embassy in Havana and also told Cuba's communist government to pull its

diplomats from San Jose.

What did Costa Rica's president Rodrigo Chavez say?

We have to clean out communists from the hemisphere.

What does President Trump ultimately want?

Does he want President Miguel Diaz Canal out of power?

Is that what he's aiming for?

Reports suggest he wants regime change.

Some say it could collapse on its own.

Others say we want military intervention.

We don't exactly know.

There's also suggestions of Miguel Diaz Canal being the one to step down and then talking

to another figure from the Castro family.

We have heard the name of role Castro's grandson, Raulito, known as El Congrico, the crab.

But when you speak to congressmen, Carlos Jimenez and other just Republicans in general,

they say it cannot be the Castro or Miguel Diaz Canal.

They all have to be out.

And so tell me about back up a little bit on Castro.

How hard line would he be?

Obviously, if it all Castro was the one that led the revolution in the year 1959, so this

grandson is he, as hard line, is he considered to be like that?

I mean, Raul is still alive.

He's older, but he's still involved, right?

He's still involved.

He's part of the mastermind behind all this.

And the grandson, what's interesting is that he's always been kind of like backstage

behind the scenes.

Not very visible.

We do know he has very close ties to the grandfather.

However, what we know about him is that he likes to have a good life party.

He has been spotted in South Florida, celebrating on yachts and living the good life, what Cubans

cannot do, right?

In the island.

So I'm not exactly sure how hard line he would be.

Is there some sort of an underground movement that could rise up and take over for the people?

There's been a question that I've asked myself and we've heard about it a lot, which is

the Trump administration trying to implement the same playbook in Venezuela in Cuba.

And it wouldn't necessarily work because you don't have an opposition figure in Cuba,

the way that Venezuela has one.

And I'm referring to Maria Carina Machado, you don't have that figure, to kind of lead

the way, lead a transition in Cuba, that's not the case.

She won the Nobel Peace Prize, of course, famously giving the actual prize medal to the

president.

There's nothing like that at all in Cuba.

They don't have that, they don't have that figure.

But at the same time, you have the protests, right?

These protests that we've been witnessing in the overnight hours, they're hitting a breaking

point.

And what I also find interesting, yes, it's not the first time that we witness people taking

to the streets and protesting in the past.

They would be asking for food and medicine and water.

Would I find different this time around is that they are shouting, liberty, freedom, down

with communism.

And so their tone, I find it to be a bit more desperate, more political, no longer about

survival, it's about regime change.

And they find this to be their window of opportunity.

If they don't make this happen now, then they feel like it'll never happen.

And there is talk about Russia and a tanker that might make its way to Cuba, it's being

tracked.

Certainly, it would go against what President Trump has done with an embargo.

Is that still possible?

It would give them weeks worth of fuel potentially.

Right.

And this kind of makes you think of the Cuban missile crisis, right?

What would happen if they actually make it there because we also have our navy ready

to go?

There was another Russian fuel tanker that was headed in that direction, but then they detoured.

But like I said, Cuba is in a terrible situation.

Miguel Diaz Canal made this announcement saying, well, we want to open up to investment.

We want to allow Cubans abroad to invest.

And that sounds like reform, but it's all about cash.

And you cannot have any sort of economic reform unless you have the political system that's

in place change unless you have this regime out.

It's all about money.

Time is down.

Oil is gone.

Havana clearly needs money.

And we have to get a reality check.

You're not going to be offering this to Cubans to invest, right?

Those at live abroad, when you don't have a system in place, there are no property rights.

There's a risk of confiscation.

There's like I said, there's no political change that we cannot be fooled by these type

of announcements that we hear.

This is not capitalism.

All of a sudden arriving in Cuba, they're just trying to figure out a way to inject money

into the item since they are starving.

Venezuela, we referenced it.

They haven't had any oil shipments since the U.S.

went into Venezuela and captured later Nicholas Maduro.

This week, he's going to be in court in New York City.

He's facing numerous charges, narcoterrorism, and drug-related charges.

Fox Nation has a special out on this.

The House of Maduro, Palace to Prison, you are featured in this special.

What should we know about the situation with Maduro, the ousted leader?

Nicholas Maduro claims that he has no money whatsoever for his defense.

And here's a situation.

Nicholas Maduro is not Venezuela's legitimate president.

The United States has said this since 2019.

However, Nicholas Maduro claims he's the legitimate president, and because of this,

he claims he can use government money from Venezuela to defend himself.

And that's one of the questions that will be raised during this hearing.

But it's very interesting to see, right?

How his life went from the palace in Miraflota in Caracas to a prison.

We have some details as to what life is like in prison for Maduro.

He is being held in a small cell.

There's a metal bed, a very small window, very limited light, and there are reports

that he has been heard yelling at night, screaming at night.

I'm the president of Venezuela, I'm the president of Venezuela.

So a sharp contrast, right, from what we saw months ago.

He was dancing.

He kept saying to the United States, come get me and now look at his life.

He's not dancing anymore.

He's apparently screaming within his cell.

Now that Maduro is out and there is new leadership in Venezuela, what is it like there?

What's the regime like with the power structure and about the people and the living conditions

there now?

So there has been some progress in the sense that the U.S. Embassy in Caracas reopened.

But let's remember, there are still about 500 political prisoners that are still jailed.

We've also seen some leadership changes, Delsey Rodriguez dismantling the military hierarchy.

But this is something very important to watch.

I say it because yes, she removed the Minister of Defense Vladimir Padrino and appointed

Gustavo González Lopez.

But who is Gustavo González Lopez?

He was sanctioned by the U.S. and the European Union for human rights violation.

And a human rights watchdog is simply calling this recycling of impunity.

And on the streets, people say, yes, we are seeing some changes.

But when it comes to the economy, inflation is still extremely high.

What do they need?

They continue asking for free and fair elections sooner than later.

They don't want to prolong this because they say it's risky.

Meanwhile, we continue to watch Maria Carino Machado, who said her intention is to return

to Venezuela.

However, President Donald Trump advised her.

He recommended that she not return yet to her home country to Venezuela due to security

concerns and for her safety.

So we will continue to watch that to see if she decides to return or not.

It is really something else.

That Fox Nation special, the House of Maduro, palace to prison.

Andrea Linaras is a Fox noticias anchor that show 4 p.m. Eastern time on Fox to Portes also

on the Fox noticias YouTube channel.

You can also catch the episodes on the Fox one app.

Andrea, great to have you back on.

Thanks for joining us.

Thank you so much.

You can hear even more of my conversation with Andrea Linaras by downloading the Fox

news rundown extra later today available anywhere you find podcasts.

To a hacker your tax return isn't just paperwork, it's a gold mine.

Your social security number and bank data are their biggest payday of the year.

Old antivirus software can't keep up.

You need PCmatic.

Our default deny technology blocks every single threat that hasn't been pre-approved.

If we don't know it, we block it.

Secure your return right now by PCmatic antivirus and we will give you PCmatic VPN for free.

American made security for homes, businesses and government agencies.

Visit PCmatic.com.

That'll do it for this edition of the Fox news rundown from Washington.

Tomorrow, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-Darramer discusses a new White House plan to help prepare

the American workforce for the rise of AI.

Thanks for listening.

I'm Jessica Rosenthal, and this is the Fox news rundown from Washington.

Stay up to date by subscribing to this podcast at FoxNewsPodcasts.com.

Listen ad free on Fox News Podcasts plus on Apple Podcasts, and prime members can listen

to the show ad free on Amazon Music, and for up to the minute news, go to FoxNews.com.

I've been enjoying.

It's not just for celebrities, so do like I did, and have one of your assistance assistants

switch you to Mint Mobile today.

I'm told it's super easy to do at MintMobile.com slash switch.

Up front payment of $45 for three month plan, equivalent to $15 per month required.

Intro rate first three months only, then full price plan options available, taxes and

fees extra, default terms at MintMobile.com.