Loading...
Loading...

BUY CAST BREW COFFEE TO SUPPORT THE SHOW - https://castbrew.com/
Become A Member And Protect Our Work at http://www.timcast.com
Host: Tim Pool @Timcast (everywhere)
Guest:
My Second Channel - https://www.youtube.com/timcastnews
Podcast Channel - https://www.youtube.com/TimcastIRL
For advertising inquiries please email [email protected]
From unsolved mysteries to unexplained phenomena, from comedy goal to relationship fails,
Amazon Music's got the most ad-free top podcasts, included with Prime, because the only thing
that should interrupt your listening is...
Well, nothing.
Download the Amazon Music app today.
Every day, excessive delays and denials from big insurers keep patients from accessing
the care they need.
And when care is urgent, these delays can be disastrous.
These practices cost billions in wasteful spending, driving up costs for American families.
But while big insurers put up barriers, America's hospitals and health systems are in your
corner, navigating endless reviews and appeals to get you the care you need when you need
it most.
It's time to curb these harmful practices and put the focus back on patients, brought to
you by the Coalition to Strength in America's Health Care.
Political controversy right now is the Save Act.
This is the Safeguard American Voter Elegibility Act, which basically means federally you will
need an ID to vote.
There's some other provisions in there that we'll go through.
But Democrats favor it, Republicans favor it, and independent voters favor it.
So the question is, with tremendous national support for voter ID, why is the bill dead?
This is like many people to say my friends, Congress is fake, and it's really demoralizing
because I'll stress this again.
The polls, even CNN is pointing out the Democrat voter base wants there to be ID requirements.
But for some reason, Democrat politicians are obstructing this.
Now there is a way to get through this bill.
And that's it do with nuking the filibuster.
All right, I'll give you the quick version of the filibuster.
Basically it means to like stop a thing, right?
The filibuster used to be, I will stand up and I will speak endlessly until everybody
just goes home and the bill never gets passed.
And the talking filibuster was widely respected to a certain degree because you had to do some
work to try and put a stop to this bill you didn't want passed.
Well, because everybody got tired of these massive filibusters, the Senate basically said
we're going to do a new rule.
Instead of a talking filibuster, we're going to have a 60 vote threshold filibuster,
meaning anybody can just trigger it and then you need 60 votes to pass the bill.
That way only the bills we really want through will make it through and anything that's controversial
probably won't.
The only problem is now that we have tremendous support for the Save Act, it's still not
getting support from Democrats.
The Republicans in control of the Senate have the opportunity to say we're changing the
rules and now there's no filibuster, a simple majority, 51 votes and this bill passes.
But they're not doing it.
They've shifted the conversation to, instead of nuking the filibuster, let's force a talking
filibuster.
Unfortunately, even with a talking filibuster, Republicans are saying we just don't have
the votes.
We can't get this done.
Now, Trump is going nuclear.
He is saying if we do this, pass the Save Act, we win the midterms.
But the Republicans just don't care.
Well, probably because it's all one big happy family tree song, we call it the uniparty
and Trump ain't a part of that party.
So John Thune, who's supposed to be the one to make this happen, says you guys are wrong,
we just don't have the math.
We don't have the support for this bill, even with Republicans.
Well, Donald Trump has issued a threat.
He is saying if you do not bring this bill to my desk, I will sign nothing else.
That's a nuclear strike all the same.
Donald Trump's telling the Republicans, you ain't get nothing done.
I will sign nothing unless we get this.
And he's right.
This is something the American people really want, everyone agrees and hey, don't just
trust me on this.
I will show you the CNN segment breaking down.
This is one of the most popular bills ever presented.
So I'm going to stress this once again to all of you.
We are looking at right now, one of the most popular bills ever to be entered into
Congress in our modern history.
Answer me this, please, I implore you, liberals, conservatives I largely know what you're thinking,
but liberals, independence, conservatives comment below and tell me why it is you think
Democrats despite their base wanting this bill are blocking it.
So let's jump into where we are currently at with this law before we do my friends.
Check out the new and improved Timcast dot com.
Sign up to be a member of our discord community and you'll get access to a massive network
of individuals, tens of thousands of people.
There's pre shows, morning shows, after shows.
It is community to help you get the job done.
This is what people are for.
And as a member, you are supporting the work we do, making all of it possible and we can't
do it without you.
I mean, that's sincerely.
I've been in this job for a long time, work long hours and if anything else, Monday
was my birthday.
I turned 40 years old and I'm going to milk it for all its worth.
So if you appreciate the work that I've done and do, please, for my birthday, consider
joining our community and I'm hoping that will be a great gift, not just to me, but to
the people in the community who are working hard every day to build culture and help change
the world.
And don't forget, as a member, you can call in to Timcast IRL Monday through Thursday
at 10 p.m. to talk to us and our guests.
I say, it's tremendously worth it.
Well, here's the first story and I'll run through some headlines real quick to give you
a general understanding before we get into the bulk of the Save Act.
Tune, Thune, whatever you pronounce the name, John Thune quashes Trump push to reform the
filibuster for the Save Act, basically saying it's not going to happen.
And people are pissed.
Now there's a lot of liberal pundits that are like, but this is the right thing to do because
voter ID is racist.
But when you look at the core voter base, everyone, and boy, I mean everyone supports
this bill.
To be fair, 71% of Democrats, but independence and Republicans are basically at 90%.
So when you look at the raw numbers, it's like 85% of this country are in favor of this.
Now first, before I show you all the core details, Trump's arguments and what the counters
are, let me explain to you what the Save Act actually is from rock.
The Save Act, Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, sometimes referred to as the Save America
Act in later versions, is a piece of US legislation aimed at election integrity, particularly
regarding citizenship requirements for voting in federal elections.
Its primary purpose is to ensure that only US citizens can register to vote by requiring
documentary proof of US citizenship when someone applies to register or update their registration
for federal elections.
It demands the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to impose its mandate on states.
It would require documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration in federal elections,
states cannot accept or process a registration application without proof present at the time
of application.
This would be a passport, a real ID, a birth certificate, military ID, naturalization certificate
or similar documents, other limited options like certain tribal or American Indian cards.
States must provide an alternative process for applicants who lack the listed documents
to submit other evidence as citizenship.
I want to stress this point.
This has always been a principle reason why this is a popular bill.
When they argue that it means women won't be able to vote and black people won't be able
to vote.
None of that is true.
They actually provide alternative means to make sure if you are a citizen but you lack
the ability to prove like you don't have an idea or something, they're going to make
it.
It may be a little difficult but we're going to get you there.
We want election integrity.
I think it's a fair thing for any country to ask for.
Some versions like 2026 add or modify elements such as requiring a photo ID to vote in person,
including states to submit voter rolls to the DHS, ongoing voter roll maintenance to
remove non-citizens.
Again, I want to stress this.
This is about registration.
They are making it seem like when you show up to the polling station to vote, they're going
to say, please show me your ID.
They're saying when you register, which means many states are still going to allow people
to walk into a voting booth without proving who they are.
So I stress this.
This is not even the most egregious of bills that they could present.
Not, however, gives us the debate, saying supporters argue it's common sense election
security to prevent non-citizen voting, already illegal under federal law, and strengthen verification
beyond self attestation on registration forms.
Critics are content it creates unnecessary barriers as non-citizen voting is extremely
rare.
They note that millions of eligible citizens lack easy access to required documents, and
it could disrupt registration drives, online mail options, and disproportionately affect
groups like the elderly and young voters.
The bill has passed the House multiple times in 24, 25, and 26.
As of early 26, versions continue to be pushed.
For the most current official text, you can go to congress.gov, indeed we can.
So where are we right now, my friends?
Donald Trump has dropped the bomb.
He said, this is our number one priority.
It must get done.
According to Politico, President Donald Trump told House Republicans Monday to pass a major
partisan elections bill, a third time with new provisions, saying it should be the GOP's
number one priority ahead of midterm elections.
It will guarantee the midterms.
Trump's old lawmakers gathered his golf resort.
If you don't get it, big trouble my opinion.
If you don't get it, big trouble.
The president spent 13 minutes at the close of a nearly hour long address making crystal
clear he expects Speaker Mike Johnson and other top leaders to meet his demands.
The House has already passed two versions of what is now called the Save America Act.
But Trump asked the gathered lawmakers to add in provisions, curbing mail voting and
targeting transgender rights, even if it means abandoning the remainder of their legislative
agenda.
Let's go for the goal, he said, it's actually a matter in a serious way of national survival.
We can't have these elections going on like this anymore.
The already passed version of the Save America Act is awaiting a Senate vote.
Majority leader John Thune has committed to calling it up, but is certain to be blocked
by Democrats under the Chamber's 60 vote filibuster threshold.
Some conservatives with Trump's backing are looking to sides that obstacle with a talking
filibuster that would force Democrats to hold the floor.
That is not correct.
And once again, I tell you this bill is not going to pass for this reason.
The real argument being made by prominent conservatives is that they should nuke the filibuster
entirely and just change the rules to say a simple majority passes this.
What they're arguing now in the media is the controlled opposition as it were.
A talking filibuster still allow it, but may Democrats speak out.
It may actually get to this point so it looks like the process was legitimate.
John Thune may say, okay, fine, we're nukeing the filibuster.
You got to do a talking filibuster and then you get two Democrats that just talk for
six hours each and then the bill is dead.
Maybe not six hours each, but you get the point they'll talk for a long time.
A text says, you're on my mind.
A bouquet from 1-800 flowers says, you're my everything.
It felt moments belong in the real world.
Not just your phone.
For 50 years, 1-800 flowers has helped millions of people make memories that'll last a lifetime,
with gifts they'll cherish forever.
They're expertly curated arrangements and gift baskets shipped nationwide with a 100-percent
satisfaction guarantee.
Don't wait for the next big moment.
Make it.
When you visit 1-800-flowers.com-slashpodcast, that's 1-800-flowers.com-slashpodcast.
Teleredic here from 23-11 Racing.
Game night's fun until someone spends five minutes lining up one shot.
Chalk, breathe, re-chalk, still aiming.
While they figure it out, I fire up Chamba Casino.
I can spin anywhere, anytime, and there's always a new social casino game every week.
Spins happen way faster than that shot.
Play now at chambacasino.com.
Let's Chamba.
Sponsored by Chamba Casino.
No purchase necessary.
BGW Group.
Voidware prohibited by law.
21 plus.
Terms and conditions apply.
Quote.
They have to get it done.
He said to the Senate, if it takes you six months, I'm not, I'm, I'm, I'm for not approving
anything.
I don't think we should approve anything until this is approved.
He later said in a news conference that certain things will take place while the bill is
to being debated.
Trump also endorsed a push by some House Republicans, House hardliners to pass the must, to attach
a must pass spy powers extension to the save act.
Oh, here we go.
The only way the save act is getting passed is if you put in like $10 billion for the military
industrial complex, Ukraine, Israel, or otherwise, Taiwan gets 10,000 more troops and Israel gets
two billion more dollars.
You know what?
You slide those things in there.
Maybe they'll pass the save act.
But the question is, is this a partisan effort?
Are Republicans simply trying to steal power?
As they framed it in the media with Trump saying, we will win the midterms if we get this
bill passed?
Well, that may be my friends, but when you take a look at the data, even CNN has to
admit it.
Here's the report.
Okay.
What's the racial breakdown on this?
Right?
Because I think a lot of people make the argument that people of color non-white Americans
have a harder time procuring a photo ID to vote.
But even here, take a look here, favorite photo ID to vote, 85 percent of white people
favorite, 82 percent of Latino, 76 percent of black Americans favorite.
So the bottom line is this, voter ID is not controversial in this country.
A photo ID to vote is not controversial in this country.
It is not controversial by party, and it is not controversial by race.
The vast majority of Americans agree with Nicki Minaj that in fact you should have a photo
ID to be able to vote.
They agree with Nicki Minaj.
Well, that's one way to put it.
But it's true.
It's true.
I assume most of you that are watching this, some of you may be liberals.
You're saying, yeah, you should have an ID to vote.
That's surprising.
Well, the other day, actually the other day, but this is like a week and a half ago.
I was talking to a friend of mine.
She's a liberal.
She's all right, though.
Regular people are regular people, and that's always allowed, right?
It's just the weird online personalities.
And this was, of course, one of the big debates that we had seen on TV as the news is playing,
and she asked me about it, like, what's the controversy?
And I said, honestly, I don't know.
I mean, we could make up all sorts of reasons why Democrats are blocking this, but the truth
is most people believe you should have an ID to vote, and she was like, wait, wait, that's
what the save act is about.
And I said, yeah, it would require proof of citizenship to register.
So basically an ID.
When you're registering to vote, you've got to show an ID, and the funny thing is, most
people are doing it at the DMV where they already have their IDs.
So let me just, let me just say this again for you guys.
The save act requires, when you are registering to vote to prove you're a citizen, okay, when
you are getting your ID, you do that already.
This is why it's the stupidest thing imaginable and largely feels like a distraction.
Now I do understand that a lot of states want to impose, you need an ID to vote at the
time, but this is about registration.
So you go to the DMV, you're getting your driver's license, you bring a piece of mail,
maybe a couple credit cards are birth certificate and your social security card.
And you say, I'm getting my ID.
And then maybe you pass your driving test or you're already dead, maybe you moved to
new state so you need to bring these documents with you.
And they say, okay, you have sufficiently proven who you are.
You then say, I'm going to check the box to register to vote.
You've already got all of this stuff.
Like you need a real ID to register.
Yeah, they're handing it to you at the DMV or what else they have, the Motor Vehicle Commission,
the MVC, whatever state you're in, you weird commonwealth people.
You go to your DMV or MVC or whatever it is you guys call it.
They hand you your ID like, does this prove, I'm gonna say this and they go, it does.
So I didn't need to bring anything extra, no, you didn't.
You already had these requirements.
Again, this is not a controversial bill.
So for the life of me, I don't understand why Democrats are blocking it at all.
This should be a rubber stamp with everyone being like, okay, when you get your ID, this
already happens, however, I think this may be actually about some potentially untoward
activities.
Now, Donald Trump's threatening to not sign any bills until Congress approves the Save
Act.
But I know what y'all are saying and I know what y'all are saying.
And I have my thoughts and I have my theories and I will say this, while it is not controversial
among the voter base with no proof of citizenship requirement for voter registration, what are
the Democrats talking about doing?
They're talking about street level voter drive initiatives.
They're talking about going to people who otherwise are disinterested in voting and getting
them the register.
And then with universal mail-in voting, which of course is still all over this country,
they're going to mail a ballot to your house.
Now I'm not going to go ahead and assume at that point individuals are committing fraud
with these mail-in votes.
Certainly it's possible there is ballot harvesting.
But outside of any argument you might make about fraud, I'm going to put it like this.
With an ID requirement to register to vote, it means that you're only going to get real
voters to register.
Let me go back to the DMV argument I'm making.
What I'm saying is that for individuals who want to register, you can just do it at
the DMV.
And you're already got all your documents there.
So it certainly is not difficult for anybody just to do.
Democrats are arguing that they want to go to various places and do voter drives like
voter in the park, which is a thing they actually did, and go to nursing homes and make sure
people are registered and they don't want to have to verify with any kind of authority
figure on elections.
They want to be able to hand you the form, you fill it out, they mail it in, you're done.
The mail-in vote comes.
Then they can go to these nursing homes, they can go to these community centers, they
can take these mail-in votes, and ballot harvest.
Ballot harvesting is not illegal.
Many jurisdictions allow it.
Some it's illegal, some it's restricted, and some it's totally and completely legal.
For those who aren't familiar with ballot harvesting, the way it works is activists will
go door to door, and they will say, hand me your ballot, I'll drop it off for you.
This is a system bias in favor of urban environments, of course, which skew democratic.
So put it like this, this is why Democrats at the political level oppose it and why regular
people are for it.
Regular people are like, yes, fine.
But think about it this way.
There is a building in New York City with 300 units, some massive building, 300 units.
Let's say it's 30 floors, and each floor has 10 units, big wide building, right?
Well you're an activist working for the Democratic Party and you want to ballot harvest.
Many people are going to forget to turn their ballots in, or maybe they didn't even fill
it out.
So you knock on the door.
They answer and they say, how can I help you and say, did you receive your mail-in ballot
and they go, oh yeah, I think I got it right here.
You say, if you fill it out right now, I'll bring it back for you.
Okay, what's the racial breakdown on this right because I think a lot of people make
the argument that-
Thank you for the jump scare, X. I hope everyone enjoys that.
Harry Enten Shoo.
He's a scary guy.
That's annoying when Twitter does that.
Anyway, the point I'm making, the activist knocks on the door and says, did you receive
your ballot?
They say, yes, I did.
And then the guy says, oh, I got it right here.
It's like, hey, fill it out.
I'll bring it for you.
There's a few different scenarios.
The guy says, yeah, sure.
Okay.
He fills it on since how do I do it?
Right here.
Then he signs it, wraps it up.
Perfectly legitimate vote, hands it to that fine gentleman who puts it in his bag and
says, thank you, sir.
I'll make sure it's delivered appropriately in places where that's allowed.
That's totally normal.
He then spins around 180 degrees, knocks on the door behind him.
It's another lady.
That's two votes.
Now let's imagine every single person is like I would very much like to legitimately vote.
And they all do.
And thanks to the fine efforts of these activists, it was a legitimate voter drive process.
Now take a look at the rural areas where people tend to be Republican and conservative.
The houses are much further apart.
A guy gets in his car, drives it to the property, gets out of his car, knocks on the door, and
the guy says, can I help you?
And says, I'm here to collect your ballot.
I want, you know, we're doing ballot harvesting.
And the guy that says, oh, yeah, absolutely, I didn't fill it out yet, fills it out, hands
it to the guy.
Mathematically, this system favors Democrats and that's why they want it.
Because even if you are not assuming any kind of fraud, Democrats are going to be able
to acquire.
Maybe, look, you've got 300 units each, it's got a man and a woman, and maybe some adult
kids who are like in college or whatever, so you can be looking at 2.5 ballots per door
you knock on.
Now let's be real, not every person is going to want to vote or even answer their door.
So let's say you've got 300 units on average, there's two voting individuals per unit.
And let's say a third of them.
So they go in and they get 200 ballots in what, a half an hour to an hour.
Now imagine you're in a rural area and you're going car, you're driving in your car, house
to house.
What are you going to get?
12th.
The system mathematically will favor population density.
But then, of course, we can take a look at things that don't really happen in Republican
districts.
And that is, you are going to get individuals who shouldn't vote.
You are going to get duplicate votes.
And you're not going to be able to track whether or not an individual actually voted
himself.
There's a big controversy in 2020 where an individual who is from Tennessee and had
moved to Arizona had voted in Tennessee, despite going to college in Arizona.
And he said, on the news, I did not do this.
Someone cast that ballot in my name, which brings us to the next controversial and untoward
activities that we can see from not tracking who is voting properly.
An activist knocks on a door.
There's a woman.
He says, did you vote?
She says, no, but I have my ballots right here.
He says, why don't you fill out the ballot and I'll send it in for you.
And she says, okay, I'll do that.
I also have a couple ballots for my kids.
Maybe you fill those out, you know, right?
Who was the lady on the view who claimed that she filled out the ballot for her son and
sent it in, which is voter fraud?
And so the thing is, when they argue that illegal immigrants aren't voting and there's
very rare fraud, well, if there's a guy named John Smith and he doesn't vote, he doesn't
care.
But his ballot gets submitted with a signature that looks kind of weird, but it's approved
anyway.
Is he going to go seek out to find out whether or not he voted?
Tell a reddit here from 2311 Racing.
Game night's fun until someone spends five minutes lining up one shot.
Chalk, breathe, reach shock, still aiming.
While they figure it out, I fire up Champa Casino.
I can spin anywhere, anytime, and there's always a new social casino game every week.
Spins happen way faster than that shot.
See now at chumbacacino.com.
Let's chumbac sponsored by chumbacacino, no purchase necessary, VGW group, voidware prohibited
by law, 21 plus terms and conditions apply.
Indeed he's not because he didn't, so we won't check any databases to see that he did.
In 2020, many people did, and they found they had voted despite not being in these areas.
I am not saying it's widespread, but we saw several instances of this again.
This is where people begin to accuse Democrats of untoward behavior and wanting voter fraud.
So I certainly think there's a potential for that, and I certainly think it has happened.
The real issue is not a question of fraud.
It's a question of ease of access for people who otherwise would not vote.
That it heavily favors dense population centers.
So ask yourself this, should we create an electoral system that favors people based
on the way the place in which they live as opposed to their moral worth as an individual?
I think the answer is no.
I think the issue should be, we want to make sure that polling locations in big cities
and dense areas have enough space so that people don't leave to the long lines.
So you can argue the inverse.
If you live in a rural area and this is a polling location, you're going to drive a little
bit further, but there's not going to be a big long line because there's just less people.
If you live in Manhattan and they only set up a few of these stations, big long lines
you're going to leave and your vote's not going to get counted because you don't want
to stand in line.
I think it's fair to say we balance that and it's up to the state or the city to make
sure they have enough polling locations for population density.
I think it's fair to say for rural areas all the same.
That being said, ballot harvesting will always heavily favor dense urban populations in
which Democrats at a political level know if they lose access to ballot harvesting again,
which is not fraudulent in most places or at least in a large amount of places, they
are going to lose elections.
So what is Trump saying?
You pass this and you require people to have an ID to register and we are going to win
the midterms.
You know why?
When the Democrats say it's about creating barriers, they're a public and say no, no, it's
about integrity, but I don't care to play these games.
Barriers are absolutely a component of this.
That's not about black people or women or whatever.
It's about just the generally disinterested.
This country would be a lot better off if only the people who were sure and wanted to
vote did.
And that includes progressives.
I'm not saying we exclude them.
I'm saying there are many people in big cities that literally don't care and don't want
to vote and don't know anything about this stuff that only cast a ballot because a ballot
harvester came and said, I'll drop that off for you.
If these individuals are not interested in doing it, I am fine with leaving them out
of the vote count and leaving the management of this country to only those who are invested
enough to decide to vote.
I think that's fair.
Just for the rest of the Democrats, well, if you want to win power, you want to win power.
And that's the principle reason why, at least in my opinion, despite the fact that voters
absolutely want voter ID, Democrats still oppose it because there's a difference between
telling the people, the difference between winning election through advocacy and winning
election through just math.
And I thank, unfortunately, for all of us, the Democrats are going to keep playing this
game because it works for them.
I'm not saying everything's fair, Republicans are perfect, but I tell you, this is why Democrats
are playing the game.
Now, as to why John Thune is sabotaging this, I think it's because they know it's one
big game, and I believe that the establishment Republicans and Democrats live in a world
where they say, you, dear viewer, are too stupid to make these decisions for yourselves,
so we're going to make the decisions for you.
But we don't want you angry, so we're going to pretend like you had to say the whole
time.
So when you go and cast your vote, and the policy that you want fails, you say, I guess
that's democracy, when in reality, the system, the game was rigged from the start.
So with that, my friends, I wish you good luck.
There is a chance to change all of this, there is a chance to turn this all around.
The question is, will it be enough with the will of the people?
We'll see.
The internet makes an interesting place where we have the ability to talk to each other
and decentralize this power, and boy, does that freak out the powers that be?
The military industrial complex, the liberal economic order, the powerful elites, the wealthy,
the billionaires, the millionaires, and the politically aligned and well-connected old
money individuals.
Regular people are standing up and speaking up, and they will do what they can to subvert
that, and they've been successful with it.
But maybe, just maybe, we'll get some victories here and there, and this could be one of
them.
Smash the like button, my friends.
Share this video with everyone you've ever met in your life.
If you like the work that I do, and you think it's good, and somehow you've made it
to the end of this video, you rock.
Thank you so much.
About one third of people watch the full video, and a good amount, watch about half.
So for those of you that have truly watched the full thing, I just say thank you.
Subscribe if you haven't already, because you've made it this far.
You must like these videos, and take the URL, share it wherever you can.
Follow me on X and Instagram at TimCast, and of course, join the Discord community and
become a part of a movement.
I can't speak for what the Discord community is and wants.
They are their own body that they support the work that I do, the shows that we do, and
it is not possible without them.
So to all of you in the community, we are working very hard on our club strategies and
our member-only VIP strategies.
Our new club and coffee shop should be opening soon.
Mamba Collectibles in West Virginia is open for business, and on the first floor, soon
we'll have the coffee shop with member VIP events.
It is going to be a lot of fun.
And we're going to play our new card game debate me, and I hope to see you there.
Thanks for hanging out, smash that like button, as always, and we'll see you all tonight
8pm for TimCast.
IRL.
Teleredic here from 2311 Racing.
Game night's fun, until someone spends five minutes lining up one shot.
Chalk, breathe, re-chalk, still aiming, while they figure it out, I fire up Champa Casino.
I can spin anywhere, anytime, and there's always a new social casino game every week.
It's happened way faster than that shot.
Play now at chumbacacino.com.
Let's chumbac.
Sponsored by Chumbacacino, no purchase necessary, VGW Group, Voidware Prohibited by Law, 21 Plus,
Terms and Conditions Apply.
Craving the coffee flavor you love.
But without the caffeine, Kachava's got you covered, with their newest coffee flavor.
This all-in-one nutrition shake delivers bold, authentic flavor, crafted from premium
decaffeinated Brazilian beans.
Quality nutrition shouldn't be complicated.
Just two scoops of Kachava's all-in-one nutrition shake, and you've got 25 grams of protein,
6 grams of fiber, greens, and so much more.
Whether you're craving that coffee taste to kickstart your morning ritual, or as a nutrient-packed
reward, to round out your afternoon, Kachava keeps you fueled and satisfied wherever your
day takes you.
Plus, it actually tastes delicious.
No fillers?
No nonsense.
Just the good stuff your body craves.
And for the times you feel like switching it up, you've got seven flavors to choose from,
all with the highest quality ingredients.
Treat yourself to the flavor and nutrition your body craves.
Go to Kachava.com and use code fitness.
New customers get 15% off their first order.
That's KAC, H-A-V-A.com code fitness.

The Culture War Podcast with Tim Pool

The Culture War Podcast with Tim Pool

The Culture War Podcast with Tim Pool