Loading...
Loading...

Sam Stein, JVL and Andrew Egger give their takes on the chaotic and dramatic Senate Judiciary Committee hearing with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. Republican senators sharply questioned Noem over her leadership at DHS, ICE's deadly actions in Minnesota, and her department’s $220 million ad campaign featuring Noem front and center. They also debate a bigger question: Is Noem being set up as the scapegoat? With DHS funding frozen and Republicans under pressure, are some in the GOP trying to sacrifice the secretary to avoid deeper reforms to ICE and immigration enforcement?
Delegate smarter and grow faster. Post your job for free at Upwork.com and connect with top freelance talent today.
Hey, everybody. It's me, Sam Stein. I'm managing editor at the book. I'm here with JVL and Andrew
Egger. And we've been watching a pretty spicy at times hearing with Christy Nome at the
Senate Judiciary Committee this morning. Spicy in that there was at least one unexpected
Republican who grilled the secretary very hard. And then there was a very theatrical moment
with Senator Tom Tillis that I know JVL wants to merit and not involve talk of castrated
goats and dog killing and all that stuff. Before we get into that, subscribe to the feed,
really appreciate it. So, Andrew, you've been watching this with me. What's your,
what's like that 30,000-foot takeaway from this hearing that happened this morning?
Yeah, so we know, we knew what we were kind of expecting to get from most Republicans, right?
It was come in, talk about how bad the Biden administration was on immigration, talk about how
good of a job you guys are doing. And we got plenty of that. But like you say, there were a couple
somewhat notable defections. We were not really surprised that Tom Tillis, who is lame ducked out
and has a pit of reputation now for like letting his freak flag fly a little bit on some of these
Republicans. Not super surprised that he went after Nome, but very surprised by sort of the depth
of the attack and the sort of intensity of it. That's not really his bag usually is getting all
sort of like bulgee-eyed and spittle flecked and just mad. And then even more surprising
was what we saw from Senator Kennedy, who's also Republican, and who is very much not like a
thorn in the side of the administration on pretty much anything. Not just going after Nome,
but going after her pretty aggressively for a lot of the same reasons, people like us have been
criticizing her leadership for quite some time, talking about just the absolute sort of
disaster of enforcement in Minneapolis that led to the killings of Alex Prety and Renee Good,
and really trying at sometimes it seemed like to drive a wedge between Nome and the White House
in some of the questions he was asking. So that was sort of unexpected as well.
Let's play the clip of him, Kennedy, asking about the use of ads. So the background here is
DHS has ungodly amounts of money to spend because of the big beautiful bill. Like insane amounts
of money to spend. And I actually saw a data point on this ad impact, which tracks all this stuff,
right, all the ad spending money that happens over the course of the election. They looked at
expenditures today in the midterm election. And by far and away, the top overall advertiser
for the midterm election cycle was the US Department of Homeland Security, 79 million dollars in ads.
They run the next closest was Tom Steyer, Governor of California at $58 million.
Anyway, so Kennedy is like, why are you running all these ads in which you, Kristi Nome, are
basically front and center? Like this is the Trump administration's immigration
positions, be by deportations. Here's how it went. Let's play the video.
But the president approved ahead of time, you spending $220 million running TV ads across the
country in which you are featured prominently. Yes, sir. We went through the legal processes.
Did it correct? Did the president work with OMB? Yes. He did. Yes. Okay.
And one thing, Senator, I think, would be helpful to know is how effective that communications has
been that overwhelmingly effective in your name recognition. I mean, I personally just,
I mean, to me, it puts the president in a terribly awkward spot. And I just, I'm not saying you're
not telling the truth. It's just hard for me to believe. You know, I mean, president, as I do,
that you said, Mr. President, here's some ads I've cut, and I'm going to spend $220 million
running them, that he would have agreed to that. All right. So, JVL, what do you make of that?
How could he ever possibly have known? Christy, no, I would do this. Guys, I'm sorry. I don't
mean to short circuit this whole exercise here, but watching people who voted to confirm her,
right, suddenly get all chasty about pop, pop, pop, I know what I did. Go fuck yourselves.
That's basically how I feel about it. Go fuck yourself, Kennedy. And I'm sorry. And he's,
he's willing to take after Christy, no, because he's too shy to go after Secretary Kennedy. He was
bringing back measles. I'm sorry, but these people are menaces, and they should get zero credit
for now, but laterally in a committee meeting where they think that maybe they're actually helping
Trump by separating the weak one from the herd. And, you know, maybe, maybe if they,
it's only they don't blame Donald Trump or say that the mission is bad or say the boy,
gee, that's what shouldn't have given you guys $11 to get $1,000,000. It's only they don't do that.
Then they're being responsible people working in government.
Right. I mean, Kennedy's point was he went after her for the ads that she's run, and whether or not
she was being unfair to Steven Miller. That was the other point of attention. How could you,
how could you throw Mr. Miller under the bus? You know, that was it. So I wasn't like, you know,
now he did. I will give him, I'm not giving credit. I will say he did ask about the decision to call
Renee Good and Alex pretty domestic terrorists. And, and, and, no, I'm said, what was it?
It was a gruesome distinction. She said, I didn't call him domestic terrorists, but I said they
may have engaged in acts of domestic terrorism as if there's a fucking difference.
Yes. She said that. She said a bunch of different things. She said 15 different things. I don't
know if we have clips of this, but, but it was it was some of that. It was some of, well, look,
you know, it was a chaotic situation. And I was responding to reports from the ground. And,
and you know, I can't imagine what her parents went or what their parents went through. I was just
relying on what my agents told me. Yeah. That was it. Yeah. That was it. Well, if so,
have those agents been fired because they lied to you and made you look like a fucking idiot?
Or just say, I regret saying it. So if, if she was relying on the things from the agents,
older than the agents lied to her, and are they being held accountable? Are there, are there
HR proceedings against them? No, we could play Klobuchar because I think Klobuchar pushed her
specifically on this. And to your point, Javier, she never once says, I regret doing it.
Ever. No, ever. She just said, well, I was giving bad information. Narian apology never saying,
well, you know, we're looking into it. And I shouldn't have jumped to hasty conclusions or
anything like that. After the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretty, when I spoke to Alex's
parents, they told me that you calling him a domestic terrorist. This was directly from them
the day after he was killed, a nurse in our VA, Alex, one of the most hurtful things they could
ever imagine was said by you about their son. Do you have anything you want to say to Alex
Pretty's parents? We were relying in the hours after that incident that was so horrific.
On information, we were getting from a graduate agent. But I would say to the parents or to the
family of Renee Good, after you called them domestic terrorists. Can't even imagine what they
have gone through in the loss of their son, in the loss of their family members. But how about
specifically calling them domestic terrorists without any evidence of that?
Sure. I did. A man I did not call him a domestic terrorist. I said it appeared to be an incident of.
I think the parents saw it for way to less. You frozen faced fucking ghoul.
I mean, I'm sorry. And you know what? Clobo? Not doing the best job there, like not coming with the
actual receipts, not going at her hard, right? Not saying, oh, no, here's what you actually said.
They could have played the video. Yeah. I'm sorry. I'm too hot for for you. I know that we're all
supposed to like be, you know, playing it cool. It's a cool medium for YouTube. This is, like,
this is unfucking believable. Right. It really does put just, I mean, like, it's all been happening
out there for days and days and weeks and weeks. And we've been swimming in it. All the horror that
has been coming out of Minneapolis, all of the just ridiculous decision-making that happened to
put those policies in place. And then just the just the unbelievable way that her department at
her leadership decided to respond in real time to all of these actions. I mean, I don't know,
JVL, I thought Clobo Char did a pretty good job of putting the specific question to her of look,
a horrible thing happened. And it was your people who did it. It was your people who killed
these citizens. But it wasn't just that they harmed the families of Alex Credit and Renee Good.
You harmed them. You harmed them by immediately getting right there and smearing them in this way.
And they said that that was actually maybe the most painful thing, seeing their government do that.
And I mean, what's she gonna say? I mean, like, she's she's there's a reason why some Republicans
want to hang her out to dry for this, right? I mean, there's a reason why it's not a matter of
credit, really. It's just it's just like the the the bloodless real politic of this thing.
Let me play a game. What is what if you asked what she what she's gonna say? Would it really
been that harmful to say we shouldn't have done it. We acted hastily. We spoke hastily. That would
have been harmful. Can't say that. I mean, not in Trump world, right? In Trump world, you can't ever
it's dominance politics and you cannot apologize. You cannot ever admit a mistake in Trump world.
That would get her fired. And we we've seen that. I mean, that's that's happened repeatedly in
this administration. You know, any lawyer who like gives an inch in a court setting or whatever
is immediately, you know, gets the shepherds crook and gets yanked out of there. The only thing
that is keeping Christy Nome in her job, despite the fact that everybody knows what a dumpster fire
she made of Minneapolis and has made of immigration enforcement all throughout the first year of
Trump's term. The only thing that is keeping in her in her job is the fact that Donald Trump
still gives her sort of like the divine imprimatur, right? I mean, she still has the mandate of heaven.
Even though so many people even in her own agency know that she's awful, they're gunning for her.
Corey has the mandate of heaven. Yes, exactly. Corey Lewandowski, who, you know, has an
interest day. Her very special advisor. Yes, exactly. They may or may not have a love plane. We
don't know. We don't know. That did come up today, by the way. They were asked about love. But
so she has only one mission, right? Her one mission is to continue to not lose the mandate of
heaven. And that's why you can't apologize. Even though everybody knows that you affect this
upside. But the context here. So here's, I want to just sort of hint at something that is in
the air, which is that DHS funding is frozen right now. Okay, they obviously have a boatload of
cash because of the big beautiful bell. And they're they're going to be fine. Ice is going to be
fine for sure. But DHS funding itself is frozen. Republicans turning on Nome in this context,
at least Kennedy until us that we're going to talk about in a second. I don't know. There
is a signal. There's some whiff up there that this is an effort for Republicans to try to
signal to Democrats on the hill. Hey, let if we get this person out, if we turn on this person too,
if we get new leadership at DHS, could we get to an agreement? That's that seems to me to be the
context here. Now, let's turn to Tillis because Tillis, look, it was heavy on theatrics. There were
some actual news breaks here in that he said, you know, he wants a DHS inspector general report,
which has been stimmed. He said he's going to hold any and blank nomination until he gets
a response. That's real. He says he will deny quorum on as many communities as I can denying a quorum
on committees until he gets a response after two weeks. That's real. Like, they need to actually
have these quorms. So those are real steps. Everything else was very theatrical and enjoyable.
Why don't we start? And I know where Javier is going to come down to this because Tillis did vote
for her. He did. And he only started speaking up once he decides to retire. Still, it was good
theater. So let's start with the dog. And then we'll get to the cover up. You should know that if
you're going out to a hunting lodge and you're putting peasants out and you're putting dogs out,
you don't take a puppy out there. A 14 month old dog is basically a teenager and dog years.
You decided to kill that dog because you had not invested the appropriate time and training.
And then you have the audacity to go into a book and say it's a leadership lesson about tough
choices. It's in your book. We could play it if we had time at that same watch hour. You killed a
goat and you killed a goat because you said it was behaving badly. You were a farmer. You don't
castrate a goat. They behave badly. You should have probably done that before. But my point is
those are bad decisions made in the heat of the moment. Not unlike what happened up in Minneapolis.
I think it is unlike what happened in Minneapolis. Also, I'm not sure about the goat castration.
I'm just not my area of expertise engineer. We're debating what the protocols are on goat
constriction. JBL. Was that book out before her confirmation hearing? Yes, of course.
So now he views the information that he had prior to voting for her as
disqualifying. Bullard takes a sponsored by Upwork. One of the biggest growth hacks I've come across
is realizing that you don't have to do it all yourself. The fastest growing businesses aren't
doing more. They're just delegating smarter. That's exactly what Upwork lets you do. Whether you
need a developer for a sprint, a data analyst for a project or marketing help you can turn on and
off. Upwork gets you there really fast without the headache of a full-time hire. Upwork is a one-stop
platform to find higher and pay expert freelancers across the web and software development. Data and
analytics, marketing, business operations and much, much more. You browse profiles, review past work
and you get help scoping the role so you can hire with confidence and get started quickly. Upwork cuts
down on operational hassle by handling things like contracts and payments all in one place so you
can focus on actually running your business. Novel, I know. It's free to sign up and posting a job
is easy. Thousands of growing businesses already trust Upwork for everything from one-off projects
to ongoing support. Visit Upwork.com right now and post your job for free. That is Upwork.com
to connect with Top Talent, ready to help your business grow. That's UPWORK.com. Upwork.com.
Here's why I'm so just ramped up about this and so my court is all spiking, gentlemen.
It's because these assholes sit up there and rage without ever considering saying,
I can't believe I voted for you. I made a huge mistake. I got snowed in by you. You are utterly
incompetent. You should never have been in this job. The Senate failed in its mission and I
personally in my job because you know what? Tillis is retiring. He has nothing left to gain.
This is what I'm saying. It's the other lack of personal responsibility for a thing they helped
happen. I just can't count on that. I'm sorry. Nance totally fair. He wants her fired but he's not
taking any responsibility for being there in the first place. By the way, you know a bunch of
Democrats voted for her too. Did Federman? I'm sure Federman. Federman. Tim Cain.
Tim Cain did. Melissa Slotkin. Maggie Hisson. Kim. Peter's. No. I should have looked that up. We
got to ask about that. I did. I don't know. Any of them have any second thoughts about this?
We should have brought anything to say to the country for helping to put this woman in
that job. Can I say one thing about that? Because I think this is pretty illustrative of like just
something that's constantly happening with the Trump administration where like everything is so
bad all the time that like things people get passes on things and things slip through that are
like totally unconscionable on the merits. Like if you think back to the confirmation, you know,
when Trump was putting his cabinet together, we were all hair on fire about Robert Reff Kennedy
Jr. We were all hair on fire about Matt Gaetz. I don't remember even remember who some of the other
like truly Pete Hegseth was one of the was one of the tall city gathered. Tulsi Gabbard. And
in the. Yeah, exactly. There were there were there were several in kind of in the midst of all of that.
You know, it's like, well, and then Donald Trump, you know, who who got reelected to do like the
mass deportations. I guess he gets to put somebody in charge to do mass duplications. I guess we're
glad it's not actually like Cori Lundowski who's going to be running the department of security.
It's just this governor who, you know, CPAC really likes whatever waver through. And like it's not
that it's it's not that there was not plenty of evidence to suggest that she was kind of an insane
person before. I mean, you talk about everything she put in that book. You talk about, you know,
the sort of like a board of pre presidential campaigns you kind of tried to run. I mean, like there
was there were there were warning signs. But like when when you compared her to those lunatics
in in advance, you can kind of see how these people have some of these people got there. The problem
is like that was already working with such a skewed view of reality because you were comparing her
to some of like the biggest cranks in human history who also all got through by the way other
than Matt Gaetz. Here's a little trivia. Who is Donald Trump's first DHS secretary? I don't
not have pronounced her name. Nielsen or no, that was second. The first one was Kelly. No.
John Kelly. First one. Yeah. Look at that. Wow. He went on slide there too. And Nielsen,
yeah. So Kelly, Nielsen ended up becoming soft spoken Trump critics. Yeah. I mean, am I wrong
that there should be some accountability for for Democrats who voted for this? Because one of
those that happened is we get into confirmation world. And I was like, well, I can't vote against
all of them because that'll look so partisan. I got to find someone I can say yes to. And you know
what? Like if you're if you were a list of slotkin, you said yes to this, you should have your
face rubbed in it. I think you should have to answer for it and explain why you did it and why
you think you were wrong. If you think you're wrong, maybe a little slotkin stands by that vote.
And then what she's going to do differently going forward in her approach to
handling the Trump administration. This is the type of vote that if you have aspirations for
higher office beyond the Senate, let's say you want to learn for president, it will be held
against you. People will absolutely hammer you for this vote. There will be consequences.
And you're probably right. It would be Hoover to get ahead of it now and just be like,
if you're a slotkin, just be like, biggest regret in my life, that type of thing. But this will
haunt her for sure. But this is how you stop people from doing this stuff in the future.
Right. I mean, if you're this isn't purely about like just getting, you know, accountability for
the sake of accountability, although that's nice. It would be nice to have some of that. It feels like
we live in a world with almost zero accountability for anybody. But if the idea is this whole process
is broken because you have people in the United States Senate who simply do not take their jobs
seriously when it comes to advising consent and confirmation of cabinet level nominees.
The only way to do that is to punish people who treat it like a joke.
Right. There's a number. I'm sort of confused with this because I'm looking up the
roll call. Now there are seven people who did seven centers who did not vote. And I can't, why?
I'm just rap. I can't remember this. I will note that. Raphael Warnart was one of them.
Brian Schatz was another one who did not vote. Somebody from Hawaii.
Yeah. Brian Schatz. Yeah. Let me just close with it. Because I want to give, I know we're being
rightfully hard on tennis for not doing more and not explaining the votes. But I do want to give
at least a little bit of kudos to Tillis. Because there are ways to go out of office that you can
just slink and say, you know, and I'm going to just get a lobbying gig and I'm not going to
rock the boat. And, you know, I got to still work in this town. I don't want to like fuck over
Trump and all that stuff, whatever. This guy at least is putting some elbow grease into the criticisms
here. And he has spoken out unlike a lot of his other retiring Republican colleagues about what
happened in Minnesota. Okay. And like he's been very, very critical of this. I want to play him
talking about the cover here because this was a moment where I don't know, maybe I'm a sucker for
the ship, but I generally thought that here's a guy who is pissed, who really doesn't like what
happened and want doesn't want to see it happen again. So let's play the clip and you can tell
me why I'm wrong. The way you're going about deporting them is wrong. The fact that you can't admit
to a mistake, which looks like under investigation, it's going to prove it. Miss good and Mr.
Pretty probably should not have been shot in the face and in the back.
Law enforcement needs to learn from that. You don't protect them by not looking after the facts.
Not only should the FBI be investigating it, but every single law enforcement agency in that
jurisdiction should be invited to it. So our law enforcement officers do not have this
podcast upon them. One of the reasons why ICE officers are having threats and damn the people
that threaten ICE officers because so many of them are doing a good job is because you've cast
a poll on them by acting like we should investigate things differently. Officer-involved shootings
have a formula that we should go through every time. The first part, yes. Am I wrong?
I mean, I genuinely struggle with this because you're not wrong. This is a case of defining
deviancy down, right? And so it's only when you compare him against the people who are doing
much, much worse that you start to say, well, then, you know, like, yeah, he's, and I guess everything
is relative, right? I mean, you can't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. And if you want more
people doing what Tom Tillis should do, then you shouldn't sit here like I am screaming at him.
I take all of that. But this isn't early days, you know, it's not 2017 when the future is still uncertain.
And we don't quite know where it's heading and maybe it won't be so bad. Like we do have masked
secret police running around the country abducting people and killing citizens. We do have journalists
being arrested. We do have an unconstitutional war going on. Like I feel like we know directionally
where this is all heading. And everyone's just kind of hoping that it works out fine, right?
But I don't know. Andrew, where are you on this? You are typically much more sensible than I am.
I just wanted to say, I don't know about that. I just wanted to say one thing about sort of the
direction of these of these things because because both Tillis and Kennedy do sort of the same thing
where they are kind of trying to like send Christy Nome out as the scapegoat bearing the sins of
the government into the wilderness, right? And Kennedy was a little bit more sort of like, you know,
blunt about it. He's like, how dare you impune our great Patriots like Stephen Miller. But even Tillis,
a little bit is doing that with that with the line about ice there where he's basically saying like,
look, like for the most part, this agency is doing exactly what we wanted to be doing. And it's,
you know, it's the brave men and women in the Patriots of ice. And it's really just Christy's fault
that things are bad. But like this kind of gets to what you were saying a minute ago, Sam, about
this actually being, and again, I don't know whether Tillis or Kennedy have this specifically in
their mind, but there does appear to be this effort to make her the scapegoat for all of this stuff.
And to cast her out instead of getting any of the totally obviously needed and like perfectly
reasonable and honestly kind of minor reforms to DHS that Democrats are demanding in order to
fund the agency, which is stuff like keep your body cams on and your masks off and wear a badge
and a uniform and like do targeted enforcement and don't randomly sweep up protesters and people
that you think look like they could be illegal because they're minorities. Like the idea that
this would be the pitch. Again, I don't know 100% that this is what Tillis or what Kennedy
is thinking, but that's kind of the upshot of these lines of attack, right? It's like let's all
agree that it's Christy who's the problem. And then we can get her out of there and ice can go
back to doing its great patriotic work without any of these reforms that Democrats have demanded.
And I think if Democrats were to accept that it would be so. That's such a good point, Andrew.
In a way, it makes it more dangerous, right? I mean, not everyone needs to be a crazy pants
accelerationist the way I am. But saying like, yes, all of this stuff is fundamentally good and we
should be doing it, but we should be doing it more quietly so that people don't get upset about it.
And so your sin, Christy Nome, is doing it publicly and making people upset. That's dangerous,
right? That is swapping out Bavino for home and Minneapolis while you're still doing all the
same stuff. And I don't know that that actually helps. No, probably doesn't help. All right. I have
one last thing I want to mention, but I'm going to leave it after this. Katie Brayt. Katie Brayt
had a very glossy New York Times piece written about her about how she could not stop thinking about
Liam Ramos, the five-year-old kid who was abducted from a school in Minneapolis. We talked to the
superintendent of the school district when we were up there and sent to Texas and had a huge
ordeal ended up back in Minneapolis. But Katie Brayt could not stop thinking about this. And she had
a huge piece in New York Times during about how concerned she was about Liam Ramos and how it
affected her and her family life and all that stuff. She had a chance to ask Christy Nome questions
today as part of the Judiciary Committee. And I listened to the whole thing because I assumed
someone who was deeply moved by the Liam Ramos story and couldn't stop thinking about it would ask
a question about it. She did not. Not a single question about Liam Ramos who was about how ice
had arrested people like Jared Fogel, the old subway guy and P Diddy and how they were not Nazis.
So that was how Katie Brayt spent her time apparently not thinking about Liam Ramos at least in
that 10 minutes I've been. So I'm going to leave it at that. JVL, Andrew, thanks for drawing
me really appreciated for those who watched. Thank you for watching, subscribe to the feed where you
get great recaps like this. Talk to you guys later. Talk to you guys later.
