Hagada 5786 Part 02 Urchatz Karpa

0:00So we were discussing, we started with Qadish, we went through Qadish, let's move a little faster because we only have a few days left to the end of. So, but again, it's important to understand that every aspect has an objective during the night, meaning even though we know that really the main focus of the night is should be maggot, you can argue and say that, you know, there's more mid-sister ISIS, maybe in other places, maggot is also mid-sister ISIS, but after upon him it doesn't minimize the chashivas of the other parts of Agadhan, therefore a person should not lose focus of the other parts. The Urghats, which is, you know, why it's an interesting Nusuch, why it's Urgh, why we use the term Urghats, where the name of the Semen came from, why don't we just, like, what's the Urghats in Rakhtsa? Discussion in the Mepharjim, but Urghats is Pashtas, a, a, not a real chieft of Natila,

1:03at least a suffic Natila, and we're eating less than a Kizai's anyway of Karpas, because of a suffic of a brochach Reina. So, we eat less than a Kizai's, most place compensation, we eat less than a Kizai's, but still, Pashtas, it's part, it's a discussion, if this is part of the, of the demonstration of doing things differently on the Loha Seder, that we wash for, for dipped vegetables. But they're Klaal, by dipped vegetables we have to wash, there's a chieft of wash. When a person dips a vegetable in water, or in any other look, there is a chieft of wash, and the vulgariness says, you don't have to make a broch on it, but since we're dealing with less than a Kizai's, so that Svara seemingly wouldn't apply. But anyway, we wash anyway, we wash without a brochah, and we, Seder Urghats, Urghats is a washing, and some say it's part of the chinoium that we do for the night to demonstrate

2:07that things are different tonight. One aspect we keep in mind is the purity of what's going on tonight. There's a, there's a, it could be there's an emphasis on everything trying to be done in a sterile environment. The same reason why we are Mach-B-Nate-E-Tchametz, we discussed this once, that really if there's something wrong with Chammetz, then there should be a lot of chilidic concept, Nate-E-Tchametz, a whole year. But we don't find such a thing. The apparently a whole year, there's nothing wrong with any chammetz. It's only on Pesach that there's a problem of chammetz, and the reason is because it's, it has to be a sterile environment in order to internalize the ideas of Amuna Betachan that we're trying to get in the law of Seder. So we have to keep it as sterile as possible. And therefore, our whole Pesach, we avoid all association with chammetz. So perhaps that can be part of this union of Urghats, whether it's holochically Mach-B-Nate, but al-Khappanem, it's part of the rachid, so it's part of the preparation process

3:12of making sure everything is perfect and everything is clean to make a haschalan in the Loha-Seder. And therefore, there's a more of a haqpada on these kind of things that maybe during the year we wouldn't be so Mach-B-Nate to demonstrate the chashivas of the Loha-Seder. And that could be another understanding in the union of Urghats. Now, we move on to Carpas. Carpas is part, one of the reasons is because it's a Zegar to do two Tibulum, like we said we could mention in the Manushtada. And there is an aspect, there's a remas in the Carpas, it's a remas to the Tsar, the Klyasal experience, the crying from Klyasal, it's all maromas in the Carpas. And the union of eating some sort of vegetable, whatever the vegetable is, Carpas is a different manugum of all kind of vegetable it is.

4:16But al-Khappanem, the union is to, as a Shinoi on one hand and as a Zegar to the Tsar on the other hand, and really like we'll see many times in the night, which is a little bit of a shvera thing. But many times in the night we're going to see that you have one thing that seems to be Cheras and at the same time it has in it that Tsar, the Klyasal experience, for example, the Kasis, the reason why there's an union to have the red wine by the Kasis, which is where all the blood livers came from. The red wine by the Kasis comes from the blood remas to the blood of the children of Cheras. That's one of the reasons for the red wine. But at the same time the red wine represents Cheras. Wine is the dull Kasis represents Cheras. Not so, we'll see later, it's also the same thing. Also seemingly, and on one hand represents Cheras. We'll see that later, Bezoshaven, and on the other hand represents Tsar.

5:19So here we have it by Karpas too. Seemingly it represents Cheras. The fact that we do dips is considered a Khashiv a thing to do. In the olden days it was Khashiv. Today it just means you don't want to pay for more meat. So you get dips. But in the olden days you used to be Khashiv when you dipped, there was a demonstration of Cheras of wealth. So if you have, if Karpas, there are demonstrates wealth and importance, so how could it demonstrate Tsar for being in Midsribe, for the paying the clients all experienced? So the simple, we'll see it many times, but the simple understanding is that it goes hand in hand. And ever throughout the generations, whenever clients all experiences at Tsar, and even in the person's own personal life, whenever you experience a difficulty, you come out the gain that you get is much more than the pain itself. Now, of course, we always dovon like the day you say it.

6:19We don't want the punishment to put us through an assayant. But whenever the punishment puts a person through an assayant and a person accepts the assayant and doesn't get frustrated and upset and the cobble it and dovons the punishment to you. You can dovons the punishment to take it away. But the main thing is your attitude towards an assayant. When a person does that, he is growing from it. And the growth that comes from a difficulty is much, much greater than the growth that comes from other situations. And even by the others, we see such a thing. The others, as I'll say, the reason why they were Akkars, is because the imahes were Akkars, is in order that they should cry out to the burnishlam. The burnishlam, this avalanche was also in Shotsunikim. We know that they would have done it anyway. The others were always dovoning. But l'maisa, something that comes through Tsar, is much, much more powerful. It's just a bit serious, even by the others, it's much more powerful. So Mela, at this... That's why we...

7:20No, yeah, we don't see it. The hearst that's coming from the Tsar. No, yeah. So the point is not that we're celebrating the Tsar because we're not. We're not celebrating the Tsar. It's two different messages that seem to be a steera in the same thing. Like, for example, we're not... My carpress, we're not celebrating the Tsar. It's two different things. There's aromas from this aspect. There's aromas from that aspect. There's aromas from this aspect. There's aromas from that aspect. So... But, so why do you have to have the tour of aromas in the same spot? Just have aromas... You start with the low point, and with the high point. Why does it have to be an integration between the low and the high? And the answer is this point. To understand that the low is really what built Klai's role. And on every person's personal level, it also builds the person. And a Vela will see many, many times. And if you pay attention, you notice it yourself. Sometimes children will get confused about it. And it is confusing. It's supposed to be... What if it's supposed to be something that should make them question? That we find many things

8:21that sometimes are considered a Myla. And here, they seem to be as a... As a Khassarid or vice versa. Yes. What brought the Khaeris as the Tsar? And Lamasho, the... The... Basalevi says that if Klai so would have stayed a little bit longer in the Tsarium, they would have been able... They would never have to have any Gullos at all, forever. The only reason why Klai so had to have Gullos is because they went out to quote-unquote early from the Tsarium. They had been able to keep them there because they had to take them out of the Tsarium. So Mala, that's why they still had to suffer from Gullos. But what we experienced in the Tsarium was a really tremendous Aliyafos. And therefore, as much as we talk as well to try to remind ourselves of that Tsar, it also brings a Myla. There's another aspect that's important to understand. The reason why we keep reminding ourselves of the Tsar is because that what's the point?

9:22Really, you can ask yourself a question. What's the point of reminding ourselves of the Tsar? You know, that's what you think. They're a Michelin. By reminding yourself of the Tsar, you should only think to the Michelin for taking us out, which is really the goal of the Tsarium. We don't necessarily elaborate throughout the Seder on all the different ways that they tortured us. A little bit, we do, but nothing. The major elaboration is on the issuance of the Gullos. So really, you could argue and say, what if we talk about the Tsar of Achlal? And the answer is, like the same concept of Master Bagnus, the reason why we focus on the Tsar is because that's the only way you can appreciate the Taif. Yesterina Harmanachachach is a concept that Shlain and Allah says in Kales. The only way you can appreciate something good, the only way you can appreciate chaos, is if you understand what you're coming from before you went into the chaos. So the more we, who we're trying to bring out, the one happened on the Loha Seder, by emphasizing the pain,

10:22the causal experience, we're allowing ourselves to feel that pain, and then through feeling that pain. We're able to get a little teesa in what the issuance was. But if a person doesn't have any teesa at all, and what the pain was, it's very difficult to feel the issuance. So that's just an understanding of why we keep hinting to the Tsar that we experience, not because of Shlain that we're ungrateful to the British Loha. If I can't, we're very grateful, but the way to be grateful, is to realize what we are going through, and how the replenishment took us out of it.