How Jasmine Crockett Handed Epstein Apologists a Gift (3/30/26)

What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles.

Jasmine Crockett sure has a lot to say when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein,

and the vast majority of it is nothing more than a bunch of BS. This is a woman who literally

has no idea what she's talking about when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein. Somebody that's

protected Stacey Plaskett while at the same time calling for fire and brimstone on everybody else,

including on Lee Zeldin, who she wrongfully accused of taking a donation from Jeffrey Epstein.

Look, there's enough noise and enough BS when it comes to this, that we don't need a

sitting congresswoman adding to it, especially considering the political lines that have already been

drawn. When she shows up running our mouth and literally lying about things, how the hell do you

think that's going to help the cause? How do you think that's going to bridge the gap? How do you

think that's going to get people to believe that it's not a hoax? You can't show up talking this

kind of nonsense when the political fires are raging the way they are. You have to be concise

in what you're saying, and you have to have facts to back up your bullshit because if not,

you're doing more harm than you're doing good. And that's certainly the case for Jasmine Crockett.

So today we have an article from Daily Mail and the headline, Shameless Democrat Congresswoman

Jasmine Crockett, defender false claim that Trump aid took money from predator Jeffrey Epstein.

This article was authored by Alex Hammer. Now if she would have just done a little bit of research,

she would have found out that Ben Black, one of Trump's administration officials is the son of Leon

Black. Why not take that route? Why do you have Leon Black's son as one of your officials in your

cabinet? Now that would have been a legitimate question, right? But to say that Lee Zeldin got a

donation from Jeffrey Epstein when we know it's not true, the evidence is out there, the information's

out there. It makes the whole thing look like a hit job. Texas Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett has

refused to walk back comments that framed a member of Donald Trump's cabinet as a potential

beneficiary of Jeffrey Epstein. Crockett, 44, accused environmental protection agency administrator

Lee Zeldin of taking donations from Epstein on the house floor on November 18th.

The donation documents billed as evidence, however, had involved a completely different man with

the same name as a convicted sex criminal. That is so wrong and so disgusting that I can't even

begin to quantify it. We're talking about serious shit here, sexual assault to children,

and you're just firing off from the hip without having anything to go on. And what about her

staff? What are these people doing? Here's an idea, stop with the TikTok videos for five minutes

and try and govern. That might be a good idea. Jasmine Crockett, MS now Jacqueline Alamani gave Crockett

the opportunity to clear the air as a result. You made a little bit of news when you mistakenly

accused Lee Zeldin, another Republican, of accepting money from Jeffrey Epstein. But it was a different

Jeffrey Epstein, according to the financial records. I want to give you the opportunity to amend that.

Alamani asked Crockett on the weekend Sunday. I have no amendments. The Dallas Congresswoman

maintained before launching into the bizarre unwieldy rant. This is a woman who cannot take

accountability. The second she's called out, she starts pointing fingers everywhere else,

blaming everybody else, and you know, blaming circumstances or whatever. Never takes any sort of

real responsibility. You have the chance to say, hey, look, I made a mistake. I was shooting from

the hip. It was wrong. And I apologized, Mr. Zeldin. Is it that difficult? Because what it looks

like is that you're just talking shit, trying to score points with the base. And I have news for

you. The base on both sides is only a small portion of the country. Most people are somewhere in the

middle. Now they lean one way or the other, but when we're talking about something like this,

people drop all of that shit when you're an independent anyway. And you want justice and anybody

who is involved, well, they can get it. And for me, I don't care if it's Jasmine Crockett,

Dan Bongino, Alex Acosta, whoever. Every single person who played a role here and every person

who's making it harder to get justice, those are the people that we're going to light up every

single day here on the podcast. Because it's a long time coming. All these people need to be called

out and they all need to have that spotlight shine done them for what they were up to and for how

they enabled it or in the case of Jasmine Crockett, how she's making things more difficult with her

BS rhetoric. She recalled how Republicans had been attempting the link representative Stacey

Plaskett from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence after email showed her secretly

communicating with Epstein during a different hearing in 2019. I had maybe 20 minutes Crockett

told Alimani, we research the FEC, the Federal Election Committee. Are you kidding me right now I

had 20 minutes? And then you're still backing Stacey Plaskett? Look, let me tell you right now,

Jasmine Crockett is not somebody you should trust. And I know that a lot of people on the left

don't want to hear that, but I don't care. I really don't care. She is not somebody that cares

about justice. She cares about her own career and protecting her friends like Stacey Plaskett.

She doesn't care about you and she sure the fuck don't care about Epstein's survivors.

And here's another warning that I'm sure they'll ignore. Keep it up and the survivors are going to

turn on the Democrats as well. All these people out here that are muddying the waters, all these

people that are running cover for people like Plaskett who has been sued by Epstein's survivors.

Don't think that you're immune from being called an enabler because that's exactly what you're

doing. You're enabling this mess to continue because you're throwing mud in the water instead of

giving us clarity. And then when you're called out on it instead of walking it back you go deeper

and you launch into a rant about Stacey Plaskett who is obviously guilty of a relationship with

Jeffrey Epstein guilty of taking money from him and taking direction from him. But that's something

that shouldn't be talked about. We shouldn't have any conversation about that. And this lady wants

us to take her seriously. Sorry, not going to do it. And because I like to speak with specificity,

that's kind of what comes with being an attorney. I made clear that there was a Jeffrey Epstein.

They knew on the other side that I did not have time to actually pull up and actually research.

So you're an attorney and you don't know any of that. You don't know that you have to do your due

diligence. So what else is she just winging? What else is she just doing in 20 minutes?

Again, enough with the TikTok videos, enough with the ex-posts. And how about some governance?

How about doing the work of the people for once? I mean, is that too much to ask? How about instead

of trying to launch bombs and catch somebody in a gacha moment, you actually do the research and go

after the people that have already been tied to Jeffrey Epstein. And if you want to talk about a

Republican that's been tied to him, go after Leon Black, go after Les Waxner, people that have

tangible ties that we can trace the money back to, people that need to be questioned. But no,

Lee Zeldin, really, with a wrong Jeffrey Epstein.

Especially since that particular one that Lee Zeldin got up in an uproar about was specifically

out of the New York area she added, well, of course, not only one Jeffrey Epstein could live in New

York, right? Like here's an idea, do a basic amount of research. If a podcaster or an investigative

journalist can do a basic amount of research, so can a congresswoman with a whole lot of staff

that gets paid to do that. So please stop the nonsense.

We know that he was out of the area. So, and this obviously was not done post Jeffrey Epstein's

life. So I made sure that I said, a Jeffrey Epstein. This lady is disgusting. And I'm sorry if

that offends you, she is gross. Seemingly unconvinced, Alemanie shot back that Crockett had been

trying to insinuate that the donations came from the Jeffrey Epstein. Oh, I absolutely was

insinuating that it could be possible. That is true. Crockett maintained before doubling down.

But the point is I never said it was that specific one because I did not have the adequate time to

do it. No, you tried to pass it off and you thought people were stupid. You thought nobody was

going to look into it, but you're wrong. And if you're going to come and talk some nonsense,

you better have your facts correct. Because if not, you're going to be challenged and your

bullshit is going to get called out. And I can't speak for anybody else, but you better believe

your boy is going to be here every day holding these people accountable. That's our job is citizens,

right? It's not like we just elect people and then sit back and say, ah, you know what? Have at it.

We have to be involved, bro. We have to make sure that these people are accountable to us,

the people. And if not, we get what we're seeing here. An absolute shit show of people with no

accountability and no common sense. She strangely added how Jeffrey Epstein is not like a normal name.

What does that even mean? What's a normal name? I mean, there are plenty of Jeffrey Epstein's

out there Epstein's a relatively average name when it comes to people of Jewish background.

Jewish ethnicity. I had a buddy named Dan Epstein when I was growing up. Does that mean he's

related to Jeffrey? Like the stupidity that comes out of this lady's mouth could be weighed in

metric tons. But you can agree that Lee Zeldin didn't receive money from the Jeffrey Epstein.

Alamani said, given Crockett, another opening. I can agree that Lee Zeldin has said that he

has not received money from the Jeffrey Epstein Crockett said in return. This time emphasizing

that those words were Zeldin's words, not hers. This lady's crazy. And at some point, she's going

to get sued. She can't run around talking like that. That is just absurd. The president who

called Crockett a very low IQ person earlier this year has denied any knowledge of Epstein's crimes

despite their previous relationship. Well, Trump is going to say a bunch of things he shouldn't be

saying either. And that's the problem here, folks. None of these people are acting like adults.

They're all acting like a bunch of children who are trying to protect their team. When in reality,

we're all on one team and that's team humanity. So all these people that are in the way,

all these people that are acting as roadblocks doesn't matter what side they're on. Those are the

people that we should be focusing on because what are they doing? What are they hiding? What are they

scared of? Epstein was found dead in a Manhattan jail cell in August of 2019. And outspoken Trump

critic Crockett has surfaced as a rising star in the Democratic Party after being elected in 2023.

Bro, come on. Guys, stop. I understand you don't like Trump, but this lady is not the way to go.

She is not somebody that you want even pair in your socks in the morning. Never mind making big

decisions if you can't do basic research. Just step back and let other people do it.

Worry about your district because you're not cut out for this Jasmine Crockett. Sorry.

She's ramped up her podcast and interview appearances as of late ahead of a potential Senate run

in the lone star state. Wow. If people elect this lady, I don't even know what to say.

Seriously, I have no idea. And at some point, we have to take a look at ourselves and ask,

why do we keep electing these people and then complaining that nothing changes? So if we continue

to vote for the same people, we can't complain that shit stays the same.

Do you really think that a guy like Chuck Grassley should be running for Congress or whatever

at fucking 90 something years old? Come on, man. I'm 45 and I'm tired all the time. I can't even

imagine being 90 something years old. But yet he's out there trotted up like he's this great

Paragon of the Republic. Enough is enough. We have a bunch of people that are not qualified

to be doing the jobs that they're doing. And these people are causing tremendous harm.

MS now formerly MSNBC changed its name after splitting with NBC Universal last month.

It's now run by Versaunt, which is comprised of Comcast cable channels. Whatever that means,

I don't watch any cable news so I don't care one way or the other, but Jasmine Crockett has some nerve.

At least have the decency to walk it back, but instead she doubles down, it's truly bizarre to see.

And the fact that people aren't calling her out over it, that's disturbing as well. Remember,

folks, this has to be everybody involved. We can't have faves and we can't sit here and pick and

choose who we're going to go after and who we're going to call out when it comes to Epstein.

Because that just plays into the bullshit that they're hoping for, division and for all of us to

be split apart. Because together, they know they can't stop it. And that's why chaos agents

like Jasmine Crockett have no place in this discussion. And as far as I'm concerned,

anything that comes out of her mouth is tainted at this point and nobody should take her seriously.

Because when you're out here spreading absolute bullshit, stuff that's not true,

and it's already a situation where there's so much nonsense, you're not somebody who cares about

the truth. You're somebody who cares about their party, and somebody who cares about protecting

their friends. And by Jasmine Crockett's own words and actions, we all know what site she's on.

And spoiler alert, it's not on the side of truth or transparency.

All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.