How NAEP Created a Perpetual Reading Crisis
About this episode
The NAEP proficiency levels were arbitrarily defined (Bracey, 2008; Ravitch, 2012; Reinking, Hruby, & Risko, 2023). These levels should be interpreted with extreme caution (Vaulton, 2025). The National Center for Education Statistics website provides three reasons for this (NCES, 2025):
1. Proficiency levels are based on desired expectations. Meaning that these levels are aspirational not mathematical.
2. These proficiency levels are currently being used on a trial basis.
3. Further evidence is needed to determine if these proficiency levels are “reasonable, valid, and informative”.
If you’re looking for accessible, research-based information that slices through the endless loads of overly worded baloney, I would encourage you to subscribe to my free Substack, The Reading Instruction Show.
Substack: The Reading Instruction Show
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Reading Instruction Show publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from The Reading Instruction Show
Quiet, Piggy: A Trumpian Response to Science of Reading Critics
The Reading Instruction Show
Recognizing Words, the Three-Cueing System, and Identifying Words
The Reading Instruction Show
Reading and the Information Processing Model: Why Penguins Continue to Mishear W...
The Reading Instruction Show
Little Timmy, Round-Robin Reading, and Kindly, Old Mrs. Peterson
The Reading Instruction Show