How Radiant and Heron Are Rethinking Power Generation and Delivery

The grid is breaking. We're so bottlenecked today on the lines that run criss-cross across the

country. I mean, it's this very complicated giant organic machine. New power is not the problem.

Delivery is the problem. The energy services we're growing over time in the United States.

The net electricity delivered to accomplish those energy services stayed basically flat.

We can take that momentum and bring it into a new problem statement, which is power for data centers,

power for industrialization, power for economic growth and prosperity, and for sustainable energy.

The idea that the grid can grow and move from the edge is just not something that we've really

been able to process for the last 50 years in the US. The grid itself is civilization, right?

Electric power is civilization. You can metamorphose the entire grid. Civilization can regrow off of a

new architecture of moving power, right, and use all of the free energy that's out there. The sunlight

is free. You put it on the panel, you're getting it. It's very cool, but also your aim is free. It's in

the ground. It's there. You take it and we use it before it just goes away, but it makes this

completely your way, I think, of thinking about new group power. It's just it's in the options list

and it wasn't even before. Electric power is civilization. Every socket, every server assumes a

grid that works. When Edison wired Lower Manhattan in 1882, he connected 85 customers across one

square mile. The model that followed centralized generation one-way transmission held for more

than a century. Now US electricity demand is rising for the first time in decades. Data centers

electrified transport and reshoring are outpacing the efficiency gains that mask years of grid

underinvestment. New generation is not the bottleneck. Delivery is. This episode examines two

responses. Portable nuclear reactors built in a factory and solid state power electronics

designed to rebuild the grid from the edge. I speak with Doug Bernauer, founder and CEO of Radiant

and Drew Beglino, founder and CEO of Heron alongside A16Z General Partner, Aaron Price Wright.

Hey everybody, we're here to talk about energy and how your companies are playing a role in

sector. But first, let's start with how do you guys know each other? Yes, so I'm Doug Bernauer.

Drew Beglino. And so we know each other. We were both working for Elon about 10 years ago, but

two different companies. So I was at SpaceX and Elon was really excited. He wanted to build

Hyperloop. He wanted to put little cars in a vacuum tube and go super fast. And Drew is a VP of R&D

at Tesla at the time. And I called him up and was like, Elon says, we need battery packs, we need

Model S motor. We need to operate these things in a never before operated condition. And Drew is like,

do we really? And I was like, yeah, we kind of do. But it was kind of like that. And then from

there we did, boring company also, there was an idea to do like 30 tons of batteries or something

on a trailer to power an entire tunnel boring machine, like one and a half megawatts. So it was a

story of power actually. Yeah, there was a lot of back and forth on what was possible and could we

reuse this or that. And also a big part of the Hyperloop story, because we published a big

white paper was actually like assessing all the technologies required to deliver the concept,

right, including from 19 it meant looking at like slingshot linear motors that would accelerate

the capsule in the vacuum. It was all kinds of fun, never explored physics for our team before.

I don't know if you were had similar. Yeah, I wasn't broken in that really early stuff. It was

more like when it was for real, we're going to do it. And you had to build it really fast. That's

when I got put into it. And just take the motors from just eight months from now have like people from

23 different countries or whatever it was. That was the amount of that. That was pretty wild.

But yeah. And as college students, they really ran with it. I mean, it still happens, right,

everywhere. I think they did it three or maybe it was four times and then they stopped it.

Which is good. It's for the best. It was exciting. I think there are some startups and I think

it was really one really good one in base how the Netherlands made a couple of others also.

It's also fun to see which universities did the best. It totaled mostly the Europeans to be honest.

Yeah. They crushed it. Well, cut that out of the answer.

No, but I mean, you should know your competition. And the good thing is like MIT was doing

amazing. Delft did a really awesome as well, though. And I mean, we shouldn't learn as much as we

can from that. Delft, they're in a, yeah, an incredible engineer is going to the delft.

Speaking of things that haven't been achieved before, let's use that to segue into your respective

companies. Talk about the moment, the insight, the why now that led you to start your respective

companies. Doug, let's start with you every year. Oh, man. Yeah, it's a fun story. So I was at

SpaceX for 12 years. I joined in 2007. So I joined when they had two failed rockets, no successful

rockets. And so I got to work on the first ones that worked. And you're like, this is the company

to be at. Yeah. I just wanted to work on an important mission. And I didn't, I really just cared.

Can I like polish one stone of this like great big pyramid that is like some lifetime achievement

for someone else even, right? That's what I wanted. So, so I joined. I did that. I did the first

two Falcon 9s. Did the ground system for it entirely, which involved all the permitting also.

So this is like launching a rocket from a military base. There's a lot of like regulatory stuff there.

This your first foray. Yeah. And to the world.

Totally. And not to eat it all the time. I worked on like the first rocket with legs,

called Grasshopper back in 2011. It was a four person team really designing and building the whole

team. The whole thing. And we were reporting directly to Elon, like just Elon to us for

and then building the whole thing. And it was awesome because we did really well. We got lucky a

lot of times, but we may rock at the flu and land it on legs. And then I did all the weird Elon

side projects and ideas. So Hyperloop, when he got really serious, I got tapped into that and into

the boring company. And then Mars colony design. And in doing the Mars colony design, I was looking

at how he takes starship there, make fuel from what's on Mars make fuel from ice that's there. And

if you do that, you need megawatts of power. And I was trying to do it with solar and getting totally

stuck and showing you on these plans that were like four miracles in we need on the single mission.

And it was just ridiculous. And so Elon was like, you probably should look at nuclear.

And that's really the jumping off point, right? I started to learn. And then three years later,

I left, I found a radiant and left to go run it. And really trying to make mass-producible,

portable microreactors, not for space, but you know, currently we're focused on a trailer size thing.

But also needed in space. Right. Yeah. So I do eventually want to do products for space,

but we got to have customers. We got to have funds that are actually there.

Yeah. So a similar story, I guess. And that for me, it goes back to a similar time. So I joined

Tesla in 2006. And the reason why I even went there in the first place was because I had done this

undergraduate thesis in how to enable New Zealand to meet their Kyoto commitments if you remember

the Kyoto protocol. I mean, they're an island nation. So it's almost like a microgrid study in

disguise. So what are all the resources there? How can you reduce the carbon emissions from all

these different sources? I was focused on transportation in particular. And I became convinced that

electrification of transport was not just like a way to solve a carbon problem, but actually just

the best thing to do from an economics perspective. And I motivated me to come to Tesla and then over

the almost two decades that I was there, all the technologies progressed over those two decades,

right? Like the power electronics became cheaper, the batteries became cheaper. What you can

apply these problem statements to just grew and scope, right? We proved that electric vehicles

could not just be the best vehicles, but also affordable vehicles that renewables can come with

really affordable storage to help decarbonize the electricity sector. And towards the end of my

time at Tesla, I had the opportunity to work on this project called the Master Plant Part 3 project,

where we were effectively studying, okay, now let's do it for the whole globe. Can we have a

sustainable all-electric or largely all-electric sustainable energy future? Is it feasible? Are the

resources there? Is the investment reasonable? And the answer was like, yes, resounding yes in

in many ways. And so I got further commitment that not only was electrification coming to transport,

but to like everything. And so the electricity grid needs to grow immensely, you know, three to five

acts depending on how you calculate and how much intelligence we need to have electricity before.

We need a lot, a lot for sure. That can't just be like little intelligent generators and

microgrids that like meshed together on that, however they're needed. All is the above. We don't

have that already. Yeah, right. Yeah, like we planted this. Yeah, like maybe he was with that. I'm

not sure. Yeah, very energy efficient. So yeah, I got convinced that we needed a massive

scale up of electricity generation, you know, production distribution, transmission and stuff.

And I had seen at the same time that while there's so much innovation happening on one side of the

wire, there's really been almost no innovation on the grid side of the wire. And that's where I got

the condition to go after power electronics for accelerating electrification, really increasing

the scalability and affordability of doing everything that's required to enable electric generation

in use. That's how I found it here. And yeah, what feels structurally different about the increase

or the rise of energy demand across AI defense manufacturing, whereas previous errors and more flat

growth and demand feels structurally different. Yeah, high level we benefited from energy efficiency

from the 70s, really, really the 80s until like the 2010s. And you saw efficiency everywhere,

like an industry with variable speed drives, with lighting, with heating and cooling,

progressively more efficient refrigerators and air conditioners. And in all of that energy

efficiency, more or less negated like the growth in energy services because they absolutely like

the energy services we're growing over time in the United States. But like the net electricity

delivered to accomplish those energy services stayed basically flat. And the same thing even happened

in data centers, which is actually really interesting. If you like look at the efficiency of compute

even with all the AI things that are going on in terms of like flops per watt, like it's really

gone up immense amount from like the first data centers to today. And that is allowed, you know,

more and more compute capability for the same percentage of GDP electricity production.

Now it's changing, it's changing now that we can find more applications, I think, for AI

than ever before. And so we're going to see, we are seeing, you know, electricity growth pacing

well higher than its urban before. And that's not just because the benefits of energy efficiency

are tailing off, but it's because we're seeing like broad-based demand for more electricity,

compute, transportation, industrial electrification. It's an exciting time, I think, because electricity

as a carrier is like incredibly flexible and as a pathway to a sustainable energy future. Whether

it's for intelligence or for heating, I see it as a great thing and want to accelerate it.

Yeah, I think though, you know, on the flip side of this, the last 40-ish years of efficiency gains

we've gotten, which have been super important, it's allowed us to kind of look the other way

about the real bottleneck in energy generation on the grid, which is just, which is delivery.

And we're so bottleneck today on the lines that run criss-cross across the country. I mean,

it's this very complicated giant organic machine. We probably don't have to talk long about that,

everyone's talked about that plenty, but the grid is breaking. So when we think about,

just, you know, from an investment perspective, the types of things that were interested in,

it's like, how do we actually go about kind of solving that really complicated transmission and

delivery challenge with technology? Yeah, decades of not a lot of change means like the brightest

and most talented people are like, I got to go do something else more impactful with my life.

And a lot of those folks actually, like, for example, a lot of the talent in GE went to Korea,

right, or Japan, because those were the growth markets. And so you got this almost like

hollowing out or China, hollowing out of the knowledge base. And so yeah, we need to reinvest

because we're growing again, it's exciting. I mean, it's the opportunities for both of us and

others to come to make it happen. Yeah. When you flesh out our energy investing thesis a little bit

more in terms of what are the types of opportunities we've been involved with or interested in,

the why now, you know, is it technical breakthrough? Is it regulatory? Is it some combination?

Why don't you flesh out a little bit more? Yeah, I mean, you know, this sort of AI moment in time

is, it's a good, it's a really good forzing function. I'm actually, I'm very,

I'm very grateful for AI for lots of reasons. But it's just, it's bringing to a head a lot of

things that have sort of been brewing under the surface for a long time. And it's kind of

forcing us to remember how to build large scale infrastructure in the US again and reminding us

that actually energy, energy is really important, electricity is really important, getting it to the

place where it needs to be is really important. So in whether it's data center compute or, you know,

the broad, broad-based re-industrialization of sort of the industrial base of the US, whether

it's defense use cases on the edge or more centrally, you know, all of these technologies that

we're investing in at A16Z are kind of demanding access to power. And it's not strictly access

to power on the grid. I think what we're seeing is the importance of having lots and lots of

different types of power generation and a lot more resiliency in the overall system and network.

So I think, you know, we all take for granted that when we turn our lights on in the office,

you know, when you boot up your computer, they're sort of like a unidirectional line of electrons

that go from some sort of massive central power generation station to, you know, your power outlet.

And what we're seeing and what seems to be necessary with much more spiky, much more complicated

loads on the grid and off the grid is that resiliency decentralization and software-driven workflows

really matter. And it's going to be impossible to build out the grid for sort of the max power

capacity that we could need even at the, you know, most remote edge use case like on an army base

or something like that. So when we think about our energy thesis, it's, you know, how do we

turn this network into a much more software-defined, much more resilient, much more decentralized,

you know, much more decentralized thing. And so, you know, I think both of your, both of what your

buildings sort of feeds into that sort of microgrid behind the meter on grid, off grid, hybrid.

We just need to be a lot more flexible and a lot more adaptable to a variety of changing

additions. Doug, it seems like the tide turned on nuclear a few years ago in that, you know,

more and more people started to realize the, you know, the board's criticality of it.

What is sort of the progress that we made as a industry? What have we achieved in,

you know, what are the biggest bottlenecks for remaining in terms of, you know, really make progress

as a country? Yeah. It's a good question. I think there's a bunch of fun ways to answer it.

I mean, the one thing I like to say it sounds a little sensationalist is that there is no

nuclear industry, but it's really true. You know, we're kind of, it's almost like we're getting

excited about flight before Kitty Hawk, right? To a certain degree, there's a really coming very

soon deadline. A lot of companies, a lot of little nuclear startups have actually been given access

to fuel and facilities and just expert support from the subject matter experts required to

regulate to make sure that these are going to be safe tests. And so by July 4th, several companies

will have reactors built that go critical that are fundamentally new designs, completely new and

from scratch, but it hasn't happened yet. So it just feels like a little bit of a cart before the

horse. Are you, does that worry you at all? Like, not too much. You know, I've been doing nuclear,

well, thinking about it since 2016, but I founded Radiant in 2019. And then for a year,

just learned how to do reactor design and then raise money in 2020. And just I never founded

a company before, never intended to really do that and that kind of slow rolled into it. I could

have tried to go much faster, but I've stayed totally committed to just building. And actually,

the funny thing is like in 2020 into I said in 2026, I will put a full scale reactor and get it

critical and get it up to full power. And we're on schedule to do that, which is kind of wild.

That's not like that was really the actual plan, but it was just, I was resilient to all the

challenges that were put in the way. We are now the only reactor permitted to, of these new reactors,

to go to full power. So a lot of others are getting to critical, which doesn't mean you get to high

temperatures or high power. And those things are very challenging on all the parts in the system,

right? And they require careful consideration of the thermal gradients and the alloys,

right? You need high strength materials to do that. So that's really exciting, but we're not quite

there yet. And I think if we're doing the same discussion next year, it's going to be dramatically

different because we're going to be able to point at all these different designs, what you could

do with them. And I think the products, like nuclear reactors as products has never been seen before.

All right, they're always usually these giant mega projects where you dig a huge hole in the ground

and you take five to 10 years or up to 15 for the slower, the bad projects out there. But reactors

that can just come ours, you know, we're targeting one per week coming off of production line

from our Tennessee facility, which is an ADA cursaid, we just signed for in October, not even a year

ago. But I want to tie it back into the grid because I was just, I had some interesting thoughts.

And we really, our product is for off the grid, right? So the megawatt reactor on a trailer,

and you can, we build in our factory, we drive it or fly it to where the customer wants it to go,

and then turn it on within like 48 hours. We go, it, you know, we'll stop moving and then we go

to power on your site in that amount of time. And then the last five years, which is like a full

oil tanker worth of diesel equivalent, it's two million gallon diesel equivalent. So it's sort of

an unbelievable thing where you can grow the grid or put a put a microgrid anywhere. But it's

like a totally different problem, I think, from the grid itself is civilization, right? Electric

power is civilization. If you go and there's sockets and you pop something into them and you just get

power, that's very well developed. That's a civilization and that's using electricity to do what you

could otherwise only do with human muscle or animal muscle. And then I'm excited about

Drew's product and company, what it can do for the grid, but also for microgrids. And to be

fun to hear your thoughts on how these things mesh together, actually, because we had talked about

where do our products actually go together? Yeah. Yeah. And talk about your product. I know you

have like a power building block of a certain size. Yeah, for sure. We're building. Our first part

is Heron Link. And it's a, it's a five megawatt bi-directional cell state transformer that goes

from DC anywhere from 800 to 1500 volts DC to 34,000 volts AC, which is effectively that AC

is the sub-transmission voltage of data centers of large battery power plants of solar facilities.

Really, it is the highest distribution voltage on the grid around us. So if you look at the wires

on top of a pole, specifically the ones that are way up top, the highest voltage those will

ever be is 34,000 volts. So we're going after all of the distribution voltages in the world.

Europe is the same, so is Asia. And our first product is DC because that's about a 500 gigawatt

market growing quickly of data centers, solar and batteries. But future products will be AC to AC.

And that allows you to do all the utility use cases and use cases inside of commercial buildings

like this building right now. They can all benefit from AC to AC. And what does this all

as a transfer? What is it actually doing, right? It's, it's, um,

power semiconductors and software. And instead of converting voltage at line frequency using large

coils of wire around like magnetic steel in a bucket of oil, which is how transformers generally

are done, you're doing it at really high frequency with much, much smaller, simpler

magnetic materials to produce called like fair, you know, fair rights, um, using switching devices.

And, and you've, you've charged a smartphone before, like a little object, that little power

brick that you have in your hand, you know, it's doing conversion from 120 or 240 volt AC to five volts

DC to charge your phone. And it's switching at a million times a second. There's like tiny

little gan gallium nitride devices switching a million times a second voltage across a transformer

that's smaller than a pencil eraser. Um, and, you know, if you remember back to maybe you had a

laptop in the 90s or something like that or you did, I don't know. Um, and the giant power brick that

you were carrying around that was really hot when you stuck it in your backpack after charging your

your computer, like just in a couple decades, you know, you've seen more than an order of magnitude

power density improvement there and efficiency improvement. Um, now you can do like multiple outputs

and the seven different voltages and, you know, we're trying to do the same thing, but not for commercial

electronics, but for industrial scale electronics. And our building block, as you said, it's a modular

architecture. So that five megawatt, Aaron Lincoln's got 30, 165 kilowatt, you know, modules inside,

the product itself was fail operational. One of those fails would just keep operating. So

like they're into that and rugged. A whole building could power off of one of those blocks, right?

You can to switch your distribution to some modern. Yeah, I like for control. Yeah, I like to think

of it as though like if the greatest civilization itself and everything is routed in AC and there's

so much, much better way. Yeah, you can like, you know, metamorphosize the entire grid. Like

have a civilization can regrow off of a new architecture of moving power. And I, of course,

like to think about the first power that you put on another world. Like if you put a megawatt on

the moon or on Mars, distributing that will like set the precedent for how you do like what the

technology type will be when you plug into a DC thing or we plug in the two, the two prongs that

we're used to in the US at least. Well, either way, because I'm not going to take a big stance

one way or the other. It's like you should be using software and semiconductors, you know, which are

higher efficiency, you know, much less mass and size, especially that matters when you're going

to space. Like you don't want to get this thing in a way. I think there's less oil. I think

that the big can of oil, the big bucket of oil thing for the transformer. It's hard on Mars.

Yeah, exactly. It's limiting. So it's yeah, it's really fun to steal an oil. It's just the leap

rock thing, right? Like let's use software and electronics rather than like mechanical systems

to accomplish our power distribution. We went like super nerdy on this, which is perfect. But

our reactor like fundamentally makes DC power because we actually run a really compact power generator.

Perfect. And it runs. Yeah, exactly. So the greatest civilization, you are pushing civilization

on that inch forward. Yeah, it's civilization anew, right? And it can grow from the edges where

our system makes sense for people with a critical need for power, for resilient energy at a

notary base or hospital or for disaster relief. Yeah. Yeah. And I think that reason you have to

use AC actually is the way to move that power. And the idea that the grid can grow and move from

the edge is just not something that we've really been able to process for the last 50 years in

US. Like the grid has been a very top down project. If you want to attach back into the grid as all

these data center people are realizing how huge nightmare is a nightmare. And so how do you

like make it easier to do that kind of organic? Hard of that is because the underpinning of the grid

is these mechanical systems that are not fast responding that don't have a lot of telemetry.

No software. Yeah. Well, if there is software, it's very slow to respond. And so you don't,

it's is harder in a world like that to imagine a bidirectional grid, right? Yeah. It's the central

planning from inside out, you know, when you're thinking about protection and like, you know,

can I stay within the load ratings of these lines? When you don't have the infrastructure to

dynamically control it the way you want, like, you're stuck. So I think we're, is it enabling alternative?

Yeah. I think one of the things that it could do for people is you have a DC battery. We go DC

to AC, right? On these all these, so attach some like large battery system. Yeah. And then maybe

you have a solar grid, but that's on some different DC voltage. And that also needs to get converted

AC to them, put on a grid to use it. But you could have little cells like these things that we

grow at the edge. It could be like a megawatt hour battery packs, a few megawatts of solar for

during the day and a reactor for at night. And all those things actually merge and work perfectly

on a DC grid, like a DC microgrid. That's that's sort of what I think what I what it could do,

right? It's interesting for people to think about this. I think it could be demonstrated at

some military installation or some other place. And so it's like a fun thing that drew and I've

chatted about a little bit, but we don't know when we'll be able to do exactly soon soon. Let's

get critical. That's right. Full power gets a power. The other thing you consider is is compute

also is natively DC. So it, you know, you're in this interest. Exactly. Compute batteries, solar,

all the name technologies, micro nuclear, actually all DC micro nuclear. Yeah. I like it. I think

it's I think I've talked to other folks about like what is what is a modular reactor? I like

you hear of SMRs. And it's like this is this in my mind is apps is like the definition of of

SMR one megawatt versus like you've heard about this 100 megawatt SMR. Yeah, was a micro nuclear

is a term no one's using, I think. Well, I think it's new right now. Like we just said it.

And then someone else said it. And it's just you will say it. It's that's it's creation. It's

done. It's andle and hammered. It's it's it's in stone. It's like mainframe versus PC, but

nuclear. Yeah. And the PC one like the data centers look like PCs. They don't look like mainframes.

And there's a reason why. Yeah. Well, SMR can represent like 100 megawatt thing.

Yeah. And building it digging big hole in the ground. It's not necessarily going to run.

It has to run faster than 60 hertz for to BDC source, right? And actually I make AC because

every heat engine you spend something. So we do it at such a high speed that we then use

active rectifiers to convert to DC as the first step. Yeah. So I think what you know, one thing

that's interesting about both of your approaches. And I'm curious how much of this comes back to your

time at Tesla's basics respectively. But your both like very focused on manufacturer ability

and modularity and modularity of design. Yeah. Maybe you should talk about here, but be curious

here both your thoughts about that. I find that there there's this sweet spot between like capital

investment and like manufacturing cost of goods sold. And you're always trying to find that with

any with any product, right? And if you just compare stick building a power plant in the in the

field versus, you know, fully integrating like a on a highly automated line, that same function.

That's a little cost will always win if you can, uh, do it on a on a highly automated line.

And so, you know, we're building for our first factory, we're building a 40 gigawatt factory.

And people like, wow, that's a lot. Well, contextualize what is 40 gigawatts. Yeah, 40 gigawatts

here. So it's about, um, it's about 10 to 15% of the ex China market for our product category.

And it's equivalent to half the state of Texas and peak power. If you want to think about it in

that term, then it's kind of useful. Let's say four percent of the whole country's electric powers

in it. Uh, yeah, the, yeah, something like that between 500 gigawatts and, and the, a

terrible odd depending on how you think about it. So yeah, 40 gigawatts a year is, I mean,

it's significant in the, the overall US. Um, and why 40 gigawatts? One, you know, looking at it

from a market sizing perspective, but the other is, hey, like right around 60 second

time is where you maximize that like capital efficiency of building a factory. And if you look

at our module size and you look at 60 second time, it sort of works out to 40 gigawatt, uh, spot.

And, you know, I, we're going to ramp that factory. I hope I expect us to exceed the demand for

that factory, but, um, you get so much quality and cost benefits, uh, going for full on as much

automation as you can, not too much, but as much automation as you can, the, the, yeah, the,

it's more than just that, but that's, that's the first two things that come to my mind quality and cost.

Yeah. Um, I mean, you think of it as such a huge scale. Um, I definitely 100% agree with the,

less like, I think it said stick building. And it's like the opposite of that is mass production.

Right. Think about doing it all in a factory. And that's our entire approach is like a new

character. It was pretty radical. Yeah, the idea that you would build it in a factory.

Absolutely. Yeah. So it's really, we're doing nuclear reactors as products for the first time

ever. And it's so that you can just, you can say, yeah, I want nuclear power and we can deliver it.

It operates. And then when it's done operating, we take it away and there's no waste or other tricky

consideration you have to make. You know, it's totally safe on the customer site. We actually

use a meltdown proof fuel. Um, and it makes this like completely new way. I think I'm thinking

about nuclear power. It's just, it's in the options list. And I think it's, it wasn't even before.

Not only is it there, but it can look better than almost every other form of power.

And I, and I don't like to, you know, imagine that it's the only thing you want to do. I really

like the idea of like solar and battery and nuclear and like put that, that whole, that whole

block somewhere. Yeah. Right. And use all of the free energy that's out there because the sun light

is free. You put up a panel. You're getting it. It's very cool. But also your aim is free. It's in the

ground. It's not flying through the air. It's there. We take it and we use it before it

spontaneously undergoes vision. It just goes away, which has been doing. So like when the earth

formed a few, four billion years ago, we had like 128 times as much Uranium 235. So we lost a lot

of it. Yeah. The same way as like you put up a panel and catch some sun, like they get up out

of the ground and use it. Don't let it turn into radon and other stuff that is actually harmful

to someone's health. It's like, it's more dangerous from alpha perspective, leave it in the ground. And

it's a total waste of the power. And there's a bunch of cool ideas like this. And a new way of like

really seeing nuclear, I've written a thing called Adams for Prosperity. That's on our website.

I've released it about a year ago, but it has this and like, how should you think about radiation

and waste and reactors and what's possible? Yeah. I think there's another thing that you're

not stressing enough about that infield work content being really low. So you know, when I was

a test, I was responsible for the MegaPak products development and then manufacturing and the

business of selling them. And the less involved the on-site project is just the faster everything

about it will go. Yeah. The premise show up. Yeah. The permanent ranks of batteries. Yeah. Just like

land, land the cabinet, you know, in fact, we even work past the pad like we got rid of the concrete,

whatever the seismic would allow. It's awesome. It just did soil nails. Because again,

it's you're disturbing less dirt, you know, there's less concern about like, you know, how much

you need to grade or what are you going to do with a, you know, civil and architectural type scope.

The local community, especially in your case, if it's like a temporary installation,

they're going to feel less concerned about it. Yeah. The fact that you can just pick it up and

remove it if for whatever reason it needs to be, which you can also do with MegaPak's. It eases

this transition into these new technologies and consider that, compare that to like a

giant nuclear cooling tower visible for miles around. Yeah. It's such a different approach.

And in today's world, we're like, not everybody is a Yimbi. Yes, in my backyard. Yeah.

Having a, you know, rapidly deployable, let's say. I thought Nimbi met nuclear in my backyard.

Nimbi, you got Nimbi. Yeah. So we should re-brand Nimbi. Let's bring it back.

Yimbi did the same thing. But dang it. I got a problem here. I love it. I love it.

Sorry. No, I mean, I think I think that's what you get with that modular approach. You get

logistics, simplification, you get quick install and you get simpler permit and access to.

No skyline. Yeah. It's really infrastructure free. Yeah. Just clean power wherever you want it

over a weekend. Well, but so I mean, you built, you helped build factories that made

rocket ships. How it seems like building a factory that builds a nuclear reactor. That's

pretty hard. What's that, you know, what's that experience then like? So you're, you're just getting

everything's a factory. We are, we're building a nuclear reactor in our first building that we had

and it's like a 70,000 square foot. That's very cool that we have right now. We have two

buildings. We had to get a second one in November because we filled up the first building because

we start doing a little bit more vertical integration, a little more of the machining in-house

and all that's happened to us already. We'll be able to build up to 10 reactors in those facilities

that we have. We both know Elon operate out of a tent. So this is like quite a bit fancier to have

real walls. But in Tennessee, we have an 80 acre site. We have the first building going up. It's

made for just fuel handling because that's the tricky bit. And so we're working the regulatory

permit path right now on that. We should be able to put fuel reactors there. And so we'll initially

be building everywhere. We can possibly find like a building with enough power, right? And then

moving all the parts to Tennessee to then get the fuel loaded there to then take it up to the

customer site. It's nice that it's mobile. So we can actually do all of that. But the factory itself

is a bunch of other buildings on that site and most of it is like normal assembly work. Like you've

got big structures that you're welding, alting things together, right? Putting wire harnesses

and things on the unit. But the factory will have to evolve multiple times also. Right? So a factory

before giga factory, right? It's a different thing. You know the process, right? Automated is last.

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. If you're trying to delete the steps and done all the other, yeah.

All the other smart stuff. Exactly. Of course. Yeah. So yeah, we're just building and learning

what is actually the factory look like. But parts of the production line that can be automated and

should be will then go in those newer buildings. Yeah. We're doing the same thing, right? Like we're

building our first prototypes largely by hands in our engineering facilities. We're doing about 10

of those this year. We'll do another like 30 to 50 prototype systems this time in our factory

location, which we hope to announce next quarter. And then only from the learnings of those two

builds will we go and automate from there. And that's the you just got to get the reps.

How should we think about how microreactors fit within the broader energy landscape? Do they

compete with large centralized clients? Do they complement them? Are they serving in different

categories in demand? How should we think about that? Yeah. So they're they're definitely an off-grid

product. So they they don't at all compete with larger reactors. Really? If you can build,

if you have time to dig a big hole in the ground and put a reactor in in that way,

then you could do a larger reactor. Maybe five or ten times as big as the one megawatt size

that we're looking at. And it's going to win on economics. It definitely should. We're already

using like one of the fanciest forms of fuel and that is so that we can set it up anywhere

and have it not be a risk to people or facilities nearby. And so we're we don't compete at all with

those things. One of the ways I like to talk about this is you could run a diesel generator or

you can run a nuclear reactor and you're really deciding between those two things. And we don't

be like super cheap diesel. Like we beat diesel at like 650 a gallon. That kind of a number.

So that's where our initial customers need to be. But if you go start looking at what people pay

for diesel and what they pay on the edges, not on like the center of the bell curve, the average

for like a country or an area, like you look at the tough regions, they're paying a lot. And so

there's plenty of customers out there. And a one go on. So some examples I think. Oh, like

ten dollar gallon is the average in Hong Kong. I think like Iceland and Scandinavia,

the northern Europe, those regions are like seven eight nine dollar per gallon for a whole country

actually. So like it's very easy to see the market is massive in islands. Yeah. Yeah, islands.

Absolutely. I mean, Hawaii is, Hawaii is pretty high electricity costs and it's

I think 80% diesel powered actually. It's got it's got wind and solar that make up the remainder.

But yeah, you could have a cleaner form of power, right? No emissions. The nuclear reactor operates

and then rain it takes it and we handle all the complexity. But the amount of power people need,

right? They need in the gigawatts for the grid. And so we don't really do that. We have the

the niche customers on the edge and we don't want to make right thousands and thousands of reactors.

At 50 a year, we'll have something in the range of like a thousand or two at the most. But we don't

consider, we don't look at it and go, hey, could we make it work for 10,000? There's different

products and we can do it at better economies and there's a couple of ways to do it. But we're

rating doesn't want to dig a hole in the ground and solve that other miracle. It's too many miracles.

I think it's important to be able to do it again, but it's not on us to fix it right away. Yeah,

series miracles. You don't want to have too many and start up. Yeah. You need some. Yeah. Yeah.

One miracle that leads to then a product and revenue and that's the way.

And then you can then you have time to think about another miracle. So you mentioned that

we're very early in the nuclear industry, where you pre the nuclear industry in some sense. So

what is the milestone or the KPI or what we need to be true for us to say we as a country,

the nuclear industry is here in flourishing. I think a couple of things. So we could have

access to nuclear fuel and enrichment that are like incompletely competitive free markets where

their innovative startups fixing and solving those challenges. We should have a waste storage

facility that's some centralized repository, which is waste safer for the existing nuclear fleet.

That's operating since the 60s. That's an unsolved problem and that would those things alone would

cause everything else to flourish because we already have this like middle layer of me and a

bunch of other startups trying to get fuel and operate reactors. And then if we're able to as a

country really have a better system to deal with nuclear waste, which actually rating doesn't need

like are uniquely at this really small size. We can just put it in the dry cask on about 10 acres

of our 80 acres site and that works for like 60 years worth of reactors. And we can always expand

and do more. And the nuclear waste has got high reactivity elements at the last like 100 years.

And after that, it's pretty benign. But we already have a waste isolation pilot plant in New Mexico,

which is like this deep bore hole down inside of a salt structure. So it's like a salt dome.

This was where defense waste already goes and they just said they were going to build it and they

built it. And meanwhile, we struggle still on the DOE side to build a repository for for

being nuclear plants. And because of that, these gigawatt scale plants are operating generating

nuclear waste and they have to store it at the same site where they're making power. And California,

this is like coastal regions that are risky that where like you can have a tsunami or something

instead of taking it, putting it in a salt dome structure in the high desert where there's no water,

no risk of like certain natural disasters. So it's just a smarter, safer, better idea and we don't

do it. Yeah. And actually, it's a huge cost. It's a commitment. That's right. Like, you've got to

demonstrate that commitment. It's the, and it's also the the NIMBY transition that not in my backyard

to clear my backyard. You know, we need that. Well, you, I mean, I think that you mentioned also

the sort of nuclear fuel supply chain. It's something Drew, you and I've talked about on the

on the power electronic side, how important the supply chain is, how focused you are on it as well.

I think you're lucky that your biggest Silicon carbide supplier is a US company. It's a technology

developed in the US. But what other parts of your supply chain than are you worried about?

Yeah, thinking about. Yeah, for sure. So I mentioned there's ferrite is a pretty important

ingredient in these high frequency transformers. It's only, it's basically just iron oxide. So it

doesn't have, maybe a little sprinkling of magnesium. So it's, it's not, there's no rare earth

in the ferrite. But the world's largest ferrite companies are in Asia, right? It's like every other,

you know, complex supplied good. Now, there have been ferrite manufacturing facilities in the US

before. I'm working to bring them back. In fact, none of them is nearby and in Georgia. And

it could be brought back with some coaxing and I'm working on it with the with the with the parent

company. Another, another is a thin film caps capacitors. There's a decent amount of,

they call power electronics, but they should really call it power capacitors because the things you

mostly see are the capacitors. And the same sort of thing, you know, supply based largely in Asia,

working with the same vendors to bring a closer. No rare earth materials there, you know, mostly

polymers and, and, and, you know, thin copper or thin aluminum conductors. We already have a

pretty well established like copper and aluminum supply. You're just saying like a, like a small

wire gauge? I mean, it's like, it's like micron thin and sheets of sheets. Yeah. Okay. Yeah,

copper and aluminum foil. They're really foils. And then that's, that's what's in a thin film,

okay, yes, okay, good. So yeah, those are, I think, the critical aspects of power electronics,

everything else is already like very abundant and easily as force in the United States. So yeah,

you're plastic, your sheet metals, your aluminum castings, boss bars and things. So, you know,

because of that, we can really focus on those three key commodities and we do a plans for each

to both near shore and on shore if they're not already. And like, I'm excited about that because

I see power electronics really moving from the like device scale. I was describing of,

of, you know, charging your laptop or where it's largely been stuck more recently,

like in EVs and, and, and solar and storage to the grid itself. And when you do that,

it, you know, you're like, oh, 40 gigawatts. That's a state of Texas. But it's actually not like that

because you have power conversion all the way along the way, right? You have it, you have some

power conversion going on at the generating facility to go from some lower voltage to a

immediate voltage like 34,000 volts. And then you have another power conversion system going from

that intermediate voltage, 34kV, let's say, to the main transmission voltage, hundreds of

of kilovolts. And then you have to do it again on the other side when you get into the community.

So you might have an 80 gigawatt peak grid in Texas, but you actually have like 800 gigawatts

of power electronics actually supporting that grid. So, so I'm excited, I guess what I'm saying is,

is, is, while, and this is a useful piece of context, last year about three terawatts. And these

are big numbers of power semiconductors when it's electric vehicles. And the peak grid power

is less than a terawatts in the US. So these are really like on the same scale kind of opportunities.

This is solvable. This is solvable one, yeah. And, and, and I'm like really motivated by these,

how much these supply chains have scaled up to support electric vehicles. And electric

vehicle growth is slowing down, which means we can take that momentum and bring it into a new problem

statement, which is power for data centers, power for industrialization, power for economic growth

and prosperity and, and for sustainable energy. So I'm, yeah, it's exciting time, I would say.

Let's talk a bit about data centers. There's a lot of controversy about them. How should we

think about what is, what is the impact, are they causing problems on the grid, etc? Yeah, it's,

it's a, there's two sides to this one. But I think in general, like if you zoom out, data centers

are overall going to be really good for the grid. And I'll kind of explain maybe way they get

a bad rap and how that's going to change. So just, I think yesterday I saw a headline about two

gigawatts of data centers turning off instantaneously in Virginia over the weekend or last week or

something like that. That is the reason I see why there's a lot of concern about, about data centers

on the grid, like, but from the grid operator perspective and, and they are designed to date,

they have been designed to do that, right? They want to keep their compute up, they want their

six nines. So anytime there's anything funky on the grid, they isolate and, and run off to

their backup generation or, or UPSs and then ultimately backup generation. And when a data center

is 10 megawatts in a grid that's hundreds of megawatts or gigawatts, that doesn't matter.

Well, when you're building gigawatt data centers, it starts to really matter and the grid stability

is at risk. And so that is very solvable with software, modern power electronics, you know,

dynamic grid forming controls in your rectifiers and the data centers, they can stay online through

those cases with a little bit of energy storage and, and, and actually stabilize the grid rather

than destabilize it. So that is like a solvable one, but it is, it is a problem that is real. Like,

it happened in Washington state, it just happened in Virginia and needs to be resolved as these data centers

keep coming bigger and larger percentages of the grid. And I think it's, it's a, it's a function

both of the data center design up until now and how they are able to connect to the grid, which

today is, you know, very dumb systems. Yeah, and it can be so much more interactive with,

with better software and with more understanding of the capability. But then there's this other

commentary about how data centers are going to increase rates, which I, I think if doesn't make

sense to me on a big picture and, and it's, it's really simple like physics of electricity rates,

right? Electricity rates are costs of maintaining the electricity grid or the, to deliver electricity,

altogether divided by total kilowatt hours delivered, right? And the data center customer is like

the ideal customer. They're consuming like near their maximum power almost all the time compared

to like your house where you, you're like maybe at 10% of the maximum power of your house like an hour

a day, right? So they are the best customer to serve in terms of delivering more kilowatt hours,

and then, and then the way you totally generally do is they like take all the kilowatt hours in,

and then they look at all of their costs and they, you know, spread it across everybody. So the

more data center load like more loads we have like data centers like factories that are steady,

constant loads, the cost of serving electricity to everybody will go down because they are,

the, they are increasing that numerate, the denominator, right? Like,

like, emotion. Yeah, the utilization is going out, right? So the average is getting better for

everybody. Yeah. And, and I think, you know, there's concern about the power side. Oh, well,

there'll be enough power. But I think what we've seen in actually last year, US had had one of the

highest power additions to the, the great ever in this year is, I far going to be the highest

capacity addition to the great ever. So new power is not the problem. Delivery is the problem,

and data centers, I increase in the utilization of the delivery system make delivery more affordable.

So I think that they will actually drive rates down.

Cool. I think that's a good place to wrap. Don't you think so much for coming to the podcast?

Yeah. Thank you. Thank you. So it's great.

Thanks for listening to this episode of the A16Z podcast. If you like this episode,

be sure to like, comment, subscribe, leave us a rating or a review, and share it with your

friends and family. For more episodes, go to YouTube, Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Follow

us on X, A16Z, and subscribe to our substack at a16z.substack.com. Thanks again for listening,

and I'll see you in the next episode. As a reminder, the content here is for informational purposes only.

Should not be taken as legal business, tax, or investment advice, or be used to evaluate any

investment or security, and is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any A16Z.

Please note that A16Z and its affiliates may also maintain investments in the companies

discussed in this podcast. For more details, including a link to our investments,

please see A16Z.com forward slash disclosures.