Loading...
Loading...

In this video, I discuss the recent announcement from Hulu that they will no longer move forward with the Chloe Zhao Buffy The Vampire Slayer sequel series as it seemed too woke even for Disney to support it. I explain how based on the script for the pilot, there's no way this show would've been good & how ending it now is a positive move for Hollywood
Website: https://www.actualjusticewarrior.com/
https://linktr.ee/ActualJustice
Odysee: https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarrior:2
Rumble: https://rumble.com/ActualJusticeWarrior
Instagram NEW: https://www.instagram.com/actualjustice/
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/actualjusticewarrior
2nd Channel: https://www.youtube.com/ajw2dreamscometrue
TeeSpring Store: https://teespring.com/stores/actualjusticewarrior
New Store: https://actualjusticewarrior.myspreadshop.com/
https://www.minds.com/actualjusticewarrior
Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SeanFitzgerald
Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/Iamsean90
Venmo: https://venmo.com/iamsean90
Support me on Subscribe Star: https://www.subscribestar.com/seanfitzgerald
Gab: https://gab.com/Iamsean90
Twitter https://twitter.com/iamsean90
Backup Twitter https://twitter.com/AJWSean
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/actualjusticewarrior/
Discord: https://discord.gg/c7PGFFp
3rd: https://www.youtube.com/user/DudeMonkeyHQ
Podcast Links:
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1o0q86AVIzH1ZhCl8pe3du?si=e260b6ab98d64e74
Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/actual-justice-warrior/id1637748971
Sources:
Sarah Michelle Gellar Instagram Video: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DV31NdtDgWu/?hl=en
Joss Whedon Explains The Premise: https://youtu.be/8rTmIhtoBac?si=o9xo73I1oHuwsk7c
Buffy Speak Explained: https://youtu.be/HfVsA9-yId8?si=t1mKK4ZXnfjKY-78
Spike Indians & Political Correctness: https://youtu.be/-0fjK0i7Gqc?si=9XGoRYZOJnE6dCbn
Even Kotaku Hated The Script: https://kotaku.com/buffy-vampire-slayer-new-sunnydale-reboot-script-canceled-2000679693
Horrible Pilot Script: https://www.scribd.com/document/1012611653/BTVS-NS
#Buffy #BTVS #IamSean90
FAIR USE NOTICE
This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
So I am really sad to have to share this, but I wanted you all to hear it from me.
Unfortunately, Hulu has decided not to move forward with Buffy new Sunnydale.
I want to thank Chloe Zhao because I never thought I would find myself back in Buffy's
stylish yet affordable boots. And thanks to Chloe, I was reminded how much I love her and how much
she means not only to me, but to all of you. And this doesn't change any of that.
And I promise, if the apocalypse actually comes, you could still beat me.
So that was actor Sarah Michelle Geller, who was talking about how they decided not to move
forward with the new Buffy reboot series, entitled Buffy new Sunnydale, very uncreative in terms
of a title right there, which we'll get into in just a little bit. And a lot of fans
upon seeing Sarah Michelle Geller so upset about this, ended up being angry at the executive
that her and Chloe Zhao, who by the way, is dressing in all black like a Hunger Games villain,
saying that she's in a period of mourning over this series getting canned. And yeah, this
caused a lot of people initially to be on their side and be very upset with the executives
over at Hulu. However, we actually ended up getting a sample script of the initial pilot of this
reboot. And after people have read this, after people have gone through this, they realized that
Sarah Michelle Geller is more blessed than she could ever understand. Because if the show was
going to go in this direction, it would be absolutely terrible in every possible way.
Woke garbage to the maximum, everything wrong with these legacy sequel slash reboots that Hollywood
keeps turning out time and time again. And yeah, it's actually incredibly embarrassing. In fact,
so embarrassing that even Kotaku again, Kotaku ended up saying that the script was terrible
with a headline like this. An early script for Buffy the Vampire Slayer reboot leaked and it's
unbelievably terrible. And when Kotaku of all places is saying that this script is too modern,
too woke, too nonsensical, too loaded with SJW nonsense, you know it was absolutely over the top
bad. And we have the whole entire script for the pilot. And holy crap, this is one of the most
embarrassing things that you can possibly imagine. And this is what we're going to talk about
today. But before we do, I want to thank everybody who supports this channel via actualjusticewater.com
slash join. Give me the money. Give you give me the money. Okay. When I created the show of Buffy,
I um, I had made the movie already. Well, I'd written the movie already and the movie was designed
to sort of twist horror movies and empower this young girl. But that's not the basis for a TV show
because that's just one story. So um, it's been a long time thinking about what would sustain it
and that click of, oh yeah, high school was a horror movie. It was a horror movie of humiliation
and isolation and power and cruelty and um and to put that into the horror movie genre every week,
there would be enough for let's say seven years worth of entertainment where I could actually tell
stories that meant something to me about my life and still have with the error and the room and the
sex and the fun. It really made me realize that, you know, when you're creating an ensemble, you
you need everybody to be in their own corner. It's like they're, they're all holding, you know,
the blanket that the audience is going to jump into. And if they're not all in different places,
the audience will not bounce. Uh, then you, you know, you, you must create characters who are
naturally opposed, naturally individual. And then ultimately they always end up sort of fulfilling
certain things. So that was a clip of Josh Sweden talking about his creation, Buffy the Vampire
Slayer and how it was very important for him to examine this as something different from his project,
which was the Buffy the Vampire Slayer movie in that he knew that he had to develop a character
dynamic where every single character was in fact flawed and their interactions ended up bringing
them together or ripping them apart because this is the foundation of a good television show. And
if you actually watch the original Buffy the Vampire Slayer series and then you watch the
Angel series, which is a spinoff, one of the things that you'll realize is that if you try to
like hone in on the mythology or on how the magic works or any of that stuff, it's going to have
some flaws, but you're willing to overlook that due to the fact that there are so many strong
characters in the particular series. And again, strong in the sense that they're not invincible
Mary Seuss, in fact quite the opposite, in that they feel like real people. So this, being Josh
Sweden's creation, it only made sense for him to be the person at the helm of bringing it back,
but of course, since Josh Sweden was canceled, they decided to throw him aside and instead
brought in Chloe Zhao, who's the director of a couple of independent films and one of the
least successful Marvel films, The Eternal's. And yeah, obviously she is not going to bring
the same strength in the writer's room, in my opinion, that we didn't brought. Also, in addition
to that, if you read up on Weed & Scandals, one of the things that you'll find out is that the man
has a lot of problems with women. And for some reason, in order to be a feminist writer, that's
actually a good feminist writer, you actually have to hate women in order to do so. But guess what,
in modern era, in current year, this is not what we do. So we have these over perfect characters
that end up fulfilling these positions while at the same time you can't create something that is
notable on its own. So what you have to do on top of that is vandalize a past IP. And this is
exactly what this series aims to do. And even the title from the jump and the premise is a major
problem because the show is called Buffy New Sunnydale. But at this point in time, Buffy is going
to be in her 40s. The slayer is meant to be a teenager. And in addition to that, they are going to
have a teenage slayer that was named Nova, according to the script. But the fact is, while this
sequel series could make sense, had Buffy ended as originally intended in season 5. In reality,
by the end of season 7, they broke the slayer cycle, they activated all the potentials.
Oh, and by the way, they also destroyed the entire town of Sunnydale, meant to symbolize that
Buffy, and of course the story, was going to continue on, but separate from Sunnydale. But the
fact is, this show is loaded up with stupid ass member, Barry. So you have to bring Sunnydale back.
You have to have a slayer that is called at that particular location. And you have to retread
all the old ground, introduce a new group of Scoobies that are no way shape or form going to
feel as real and authentic and as interesting as the original group of Scoobies. And of course,
Sarah Michelle Geller is relegated to a cameo at the end of the script, as she's essentially
getting the Luke Skywalker in the Force Awakens treatment, which is embarrassing in every possible
way. But even more embarrassing is the fact that you have all these different people condemning
one producer, because he said that he didn't watch the series all the way through. He's not a
super fan. And essentially what they're trying to do is say, the production team behind the show,
they're not big fans of the series. They don't know what's up with the series, but we, the writers
and the crew and all of us, we're huge fans and we understand the series when if you actually
read the script, one of the things that you'll find out is that is anything but true. And I'll
give you a perfect example of this as somebody who has not only seen this series, but has seen
the spin-all series Angel, which by the way is fantastic and underrated. In fact, many of you have
made comments on the fact that in certain videos on this channel, I'll wear a Wolferman heart
law shirt. That is actually an angel reference, because I am a big fan of that particular show.
But yeah, there's an end point of there where they're introducing Buffy and she ends up working
at some insurance agency, which again, not the most creative thing. And she ends up examining
the damage that is going on in the small town of Sunnydale. Again, Buffy who finished her story arc
by leaving the destroyed Sunnydale by leaving the Hellmouth. Again, something that she was supposed
to move on from ends up back in the California area being an insurance adjuster looking at Sunnydale.
But she's also operating under a code name. And that code name is Anne, which is actually Buffy's
middle name and a code name that she used, I believe, in Episode 1 of Season 3 after the fallout
of the events of the end of Season 2. So this is meant to be a reference for you guys out there
in the audience to say, hey, look, the writers wrote the series one time Buffy operated under
the alias named Anne when she was in Los Angeles for that one episode. Aren't we so in touch with
how the series was written? Aren't we super fans? We really know what's going on here when in
reality and actuality, using this as her alias shows that you did not understand the episode
in which this name appeared because I actually watched the series. I actually understand why she was
working as a waitress in Los Angeles under the name Anne. And this is because that episode was all
about the fallouts of Season 2, where she did not want to be herself after killing her boyfriend.
Again, you guys just watched the series. I'm trying to be as vague as possible, but trust me,
it makes sense within the context of the series. And in that episode, she finds another blonde girl
who is jumping from identity to identity, who is upset about her boyfriend who is missing. And that
guy also ends up turning up dead. Now, I don't know if you guys know this. I don't know if you guys
are aware of this, but this is what we call symbolism. And also, this is something that we call
a narrative device in order to develop our main character by having her help solve the problems
of somebody going through exactly what she's going through for one particular episode. So,
anyway, throughout the events of the series, Buffy ends up getting revenge on behalf of this
particular girl. And through those events, she ends up deciding that she's going to be Buffy again,
but she leaves the name Anne behind and actually gives it to that girl who continues to be Anne
as a like a reoccurring cameo character throughout the angel series, which takes place in L.A.
throughout its entirety. And yeah, that girl ends up becoming Anne. And obviously, Buffy is never
to become Anne again. Like she is setting that aside. That's the whole point of the character arc
of season three episode one where she is no longer Anne. That's the title of the episode. And yet,
the showrunners behind this particular show don't get that. They don't understand that. They just
go for the cheap reference without understanding again the context of which that originally existed.
This reminds me of when I watched a clip of Dragon Ball Super where Vegeta ended up doing the move
that he did against Majin Buu where he ended up blowing himself up. However, in this particular
episode, Vegeta did not actually blow up and then the characters end up explaining that the reason
why he didn't blow himself up this time is because he actually learned control over that particular
attack. Now to me, when I watched this, I was blown away by how stupid this concept was
because the whole idea of Vegeta blowing himself up to kill Majin Buu was to like seal his
redemption arc that had been building since the Saiyan saga. And what Super ends up doing for
cheap reference to that is re-created without any of its emotional weight or original context.
And then they try to retroactively make what Vegeta did back in the boost saga the symptom
of incompetence rather than a deliberate sacrifice where he blew himself up because again,
he realized that he cared about his family, he cared about the earth, and he had become a defender
of the earth. Now Dragon Ball Super is notorious for this kind of thing in resurrection,
F Piccolo ends up sacrificing himself for Gohan in the same way that he did during the Saiyan saga.
And yeah, it's just not the same emotional weight. You're just trying to get a visual member
bury similarity between the two without understanding the original context, thus showing me
you don't actually understand the property that you're actually writing for. And it's so crazy
because when people are like, remember this, remember that reference, remember this from the original
show. I want to respond to them by saying, do you remember? Do you remember the context in which
that originally occurred? Because obviously you don't, and you're the writer on the show,
I'm just a person who saw it when it aired. But for some reason, I can remember this way
better than you can, and that is absolutely troubling. Now again, if you wanted to do a callback
that actually made sense, that wasn't specifically a name used and left behind by the character,
which shows that you don't understand the usage and the point of that name in the episode,
you would actually use Joan as the codame, which is from the episode Tabluo Raza,
which is an episode where Buffy ends up forgetting her entire identity, along with everybody else
in the main cast, and they end up having to come up with names on their own. And this is the one
she chooses for herself, not knowing anything about herself. But you know, that would be like a
reference that made sense within the context of the universe that you're actually writing it.
But what do I know? I'm just a bad man, baby fan, who doesn't understand the writing of the show,
even though again, I clearly understand the writing of the show significantly better than the people
behind this that are just looking for things to do member berries about. But it gets worse than that,
because when they say on Kotaku that this is modernized to the level of an SNL sketch,
they are not exaggerating. There are characters that are described in the script,
vampires that come up from the ground, as wearing clothes that might indicate that they're
possibly female. But of course, we're never going to assume genders, because that's absolutely
terrible. Now look, somebody will respond and say Buffy was always a feminist show. It was always
woke. And yes, while that is true allegorically, as the show follows a girl growing up into womanhood,
in reality, every time they had actual sexism in the show, like people disrespecting Buffy because
she was a girl, those were the worst episodes, the most hand-fisted episodes. And in fact,
those were the episodes that made the least amount of sense in universe, because in universe,
people should understand that yes, a girl is the one that becomes the slayer, that is how it works.
And they shouldn't just be dismissive for no reason, because in the context of the universe,
that makes no sense at all whatsoever. Now the allegorical sexism stuff definitely worked.
The Watcher's Council happens to be a group of British men that withhold knowledge from the slayer
in an effort to control the slayer, because they want to be the masters over her power. And Buffy
has to actually rebuke the Watcher's Council as a part of her arc of growing up, and not listening
to what is perceived to be unjust authority. Again, allegorically, that is her standing up
to the patriarchy, if you will, but it's not explicitly stated that they're the evil white male
patriarchy, the evil British patriarchy, like it is in this particular series. There are in fact
lines in this series about girls wanting a guy to stand up for him, and he says, oh, I didn't want
to do that. I don't want to step on your toes. You don't like it when I deem your light, and then
the female character ends up responding with, oh my god, you always try to weaponize my own feminism
against me. And again, these are lines that would never be in the original show. In addition to
that, there's also dialogue that references like TikTok slaying, and it's absolutely embarrassing.
And again, it shows me that these people don't understand the original series, because while the
original series is dated in a lot of ways, the slaying and the terms used by the characters
is not one of those ways, and I'll explain why. So we go to the Kotaku article, and they highlight
the fact that they're using terms like unalived, and all sorts of embarrassing things. Again,
from TikTok, in the actual dialogue, in the most embarrassing way possible. And this is because
Chloe Zhao is completely out of touch with how the youths talk, so she's trying to write in a way
that fits in with them, but unlike Joss Whedon, who is a much more superior writer, superior showrunner
to her, who understood that no matter what they wrote, as older guys, they were not going to
capture the voice of the youth, it wouldn't make sense. So Whedon actually developed what he
called Buffy speak, which is the way that the kids talked in the series, which was slaying that
was made up, fits in universe, and thus could not be dated. Making it feel fresh and kind of young,
what the same time, not making it feel dated. A lot of people think that what we do is sort of hang
out and listen to teenagers and take stuff from the way they speak, and we really don't. We make it
all up. We love language, and we don't hold anything back, and it's a really nice liberty that we have.
What that means though, is that when you're writing, you have to constantly think about how can I
turn this phrase a little bit? I'll think of the straight line to say, the line that gets the
intent across, and then I'll figure out what's the flippy way to say that. This show would have been
dated a minute after it came out, maybe even before it came out, it's dated in the script, because
the way that people are talking is using the modern slang at the time of the writing, that again,
changes so fast, becomes irrelevant so quick, and it totally misunderstands the concept of
the original series, because this is something that they've been doing correctly back in 1997,
and it's why you can watch this show, and you're not going to hear phrases and whatnot that just
don't fit in in the modern era. Also, the issue of political correctness has been featured in
episodes of the original series, very famously in an episode called Pangs, but again, throughout
the course of the series, there were complaints from people that they relied on stereotypes and whatnot
in order to establish the lore. The first slayer was actually created by a bunch of African witch
doctors. They ended up making the black woman slayer rather demonic with the infusion of the
power, and a lot of people were very angry looking back and saying, oh my god, this is so dated and
racist and terrible, and that's not even to mention the fact that Angel ends up being cursed with
the soul due to a gypsy curse, because you know those darn gypsies, again, also considered to be
unbelievably offensive by your modern woke audience, but there's an episode, again, called Pangs,
I believe it's from season 4, it's the Thanksgiving episode, where the characters end up becoming
obsessed with political correctness, and it actually hampers their ability to do their job, but
again, a great allegory for the writing staff behind this new series, and essentially what happens
is, is that a Native American spirit or demon doesn't really matter, is released he ends up trying
to kill people as revenge for the loss of his tribe, but simultaneously the kids in Sunnydale
are in school learning about how white people bad, conquistadors bad, the natives were the victims,
so you actually have characters not wanting to fight against the villain, trying to reason with
them throughout the whole course of the episode, because they're like, oh my god, we feel so bad for
you, you're the victim, even though again, this guy is actively killing and cursing people,
including people in the main cast, and all this comes to fruition when they have a character that
is actually supposed to be the evil character, actually answer the question about whether or not you
should peel bad, based on the fact that you have demons that are again from oppressed civilizations,
let me play you that clip right here, so you can get the point.
Yes, he's been wronged, and I personally would be ready to apologize, but I-
Oh, someone put a stake in me. You got a lot of volunteers in here.
I just can't take all this Mambi Pambi boo-hooing about the bloody Indians.
Uh, the preferred termists. You won. All right, you came in and you killed them and you took
their land. That's what conquering nations do. That's what Caesar did, and he's not going around
saying, okay, my conquered. I felt really bad about it. Yes, correct. 100% factual right there.
This white guilt, this pacified reaction that people have, that basically is an example of
suicidal empathy. Way back in, I guess, 2000, when this season ended up airing, is described
absolutely perfectly by that character right there. And yeah, the modern Buffy could never. Buffy
welcome to Sunnydale or New Sunnydale, whatever the hell this stupid ass series was called, could
absolutely never match the cleverness of the original series, could never match the cleverness
of Weedans riding the dialogue in this new script is absolutely trash. And the reason for that
is again, you don't have the original creative mind behind it. You don't have the actual trauma
of somebody who grew up in a hellish experience in high school, who was a nerd, who was relentlessly
bullied, who ends up putting that on the page in order to make compelling television drama.
So yeah, I'm glad they're not going to get some bastard eyes at this particular series now,
maybe they'll come back in five years and do it again later. And by the way, that's also not
even mentioning the fact that the original Buffy series had working stuntmen, so did Angel by
the way, every single week of the show. And that's one of the reasons why the action sequences in
those original series actually hold up so well to this day, because guess what, it's not dated
with the CGI at the time. They actually have stuntmen working every single episode in order to
bring that show to life and a modern reimagining of the series would definitely over rely on CG and
just be embarrassing and not even match the aesthetic of the original show. But you know what,
those are just my thoughts. I want to know what you guys think down in the comments below.
As per usual, if you liked this video, show them by leaving a like, subscribe for more content.
Follow me on my social media, support me via the support links in the description of this video.
This has been me talking about Buffy new sunny Dale being slain.
Jokes 10 out of 10. Till next time.
