Iran / USA / Israel War 2026 – Gog Magog? End Times?

Hey, everybody. What's up? Welcome to Bible prophecy. Talk. My name is Chris and today

I wanted to do a special podcast in which I talk about a current event, which is the

US Iran War of 2026. I'm recording this on March 11, 2026 for context. And certainly

this is an interesting situation. Everybody from Christians, Jews, and Muslims all seem

to be floating theories that this war has something or other to do with their respective

end times scenarios. So I wanted to talk about that specifically from the Christian view

and see if there is anything that, at least from my perspective, that this would match

up with any of those views, whether this would be the Gogh Megagwar, the beginning of

the Gogh Megagwar, could have something to do with the 70th week of Daniel, or maybe

it's some kind of preparation. This is a very early precursor to some of those signs. Or

if you're familiar with some of my work, maybe this is the fake out version of the Gogh

Megagwar, which I believe the Antichrist will use to come to power and give himself legitimacy

as an end times savior. But that's not something that you need to believe in order to benefit

from this conversation today. In fact, I think that my unique views about the end times make

me a more valuable watchman for determining whether or not current events are or are not

part of the end times. And the reason for that is that because I believe that I'm actually

watching for two potential things. One is the actual events of Bible prophecy coming

about. And another is sort of a close but not quite fake version that I believe Satan

has in his interest to put together before the actual events. So I'm kind of watching

for both things and have my guard up a little bit more than other people, I think, with

regard to criteria that would allow me to say it's one or the other. And so I hope that

my analysis here of whether or not we are in the end times can be beneficial to you regardless

of if you believe in my views about the end times. In this podcast, I'm going to focus

a lot on the Gogh Megagwar. And the reason for that is that most of the chatter that I'm

hearing about this having to do with the end times is a result of that. And that's mostly

because Iran is mentioned in the Gogh Megagwar prophecy. It's Persia there. And so that's

the main link people are using to say, Ah, here we have it. The end times are being

fulfilled. Very few people are saying that this is the beginning of the 70th week of Daniel.

And that would include as Bible prophecy buffs will no doubt know a covenant made with

many as sort of the first thing that kicks that off. So the end of Christ does that. The

end of Christ has to be on the scene to make that covenant. Some people would say it's a peace

agreement, I would say, whatever it is, it has to do with starting the daily sacrifices

at the temple. So I would say that you have to have a temple or at least a tabernacle to have a

beginning of the 70th week of Daniel. Some people might push back and say, all you need is a peace

agreement. And then by the end of the three and a half years at the midpoint, you need daily

sacrifices. But I would say the midpoint is characterized by a stopping of the daily sacrifices.

So you're going to need the daily sacrifices starting pretty quickly after the so-called peace

agreement. All that to say that the events of the actual seven year period are pretty pass

fail. They're explicit. They're either happening or they're not happening. And at least if you

are going to attempt to try to be true to the text, therefore what's left for us to speculate

on are mostly events that could happen before the 70th week of Daniel. And though not by any means,

the vast majority of Bible prophecies scholars think that the events of Ezekiel 38 and 39 take

place before the 70th week, there are some people that have proposed that. And so you could say that

the G-g-g-g war is one possible thing we can speculate on as to whether or not it will look,

it's occurring with this war. Alternatively, you could say these are maybe it's not the G-g-g-g-g war,

but maybe it's events that lead up to a peace agreement. So it could be in other words preamble

to the 70th week of Daniel. I would say that that's probably what a lot of people are thinking about.

And then of course, it could have something to do with the 10 King's situation. I would argue

and I'll argue here later that one of the things that the precursors to all of this that needs to

happen according to Daniel 7 is that the 10 King Confederacy must exist before the Antichrist even

shows up. I would argue that Daniel 7 not only makes it explicit that that 10 King Confederacy

is here before he shows up, but he comes on the scene as an aggressor to that Confederacy. He defeats

three of the 10, 10 in battle and they capitulate to him. And that in itself is something a lot of

people don't consider because it quite frankly, it doesn't make sense to a lot of people in terms

of the way that they have constructed these events. Because if you think that the 10 Nation

Confederacy is bad and you should, Daniel 7 clearly makes that, you know, it's a bad situation,

both there and in Revelation, the 10 Kings. And the Antichrist shows up in opposition to them.

Now you have what seems to be a rebel. If you think, for example, that the 10 Nation Confederacy is

the New World Order or a Muslim coalition. And the Antichrist goes to war against those. Well,

all of a sudden now the Antichrist is going to war against your perceived enemy. So the only

way to interpret that is that he is coming on the scene as a savior against what at least Christians

and Jews would perceive as the enemy. And anyway, that's again beside the point. So let's

let's work within the framework that we have work within the framework that at least you're sort of

more true to the text Christians are arguing about right now. And let's start off by talking about

Ezekiel 38 and 39, the Gogmegag War. Okay, so first a quick overview. The Gogmegag War takes place

in two places in the Bible, I would say, Ezekiel 38 and 39. And then in Revelation 20 verses 7 through 10,

in both cases, I would argue, there is a massive coalition and army led by Gog of the land of

Megag that marches against Israel and is supernaturally destroyed by God, earthquakes, fire,

brimstone, total annihilation of this army such that there are bodies everywhere surrounding

the city of Israel or Jerusalem, etc. Israel does not even have to fight in that war. All right,

let's start off with some points. The first point I would have is that in the Gogmegag War,

both in Ezekiel 38 and 39 and in Revelation 20, the idea that there are massive amounts of

ground troops marching on Israel is emphasized. So in Ezekiel 38 and 39, let's see, you will go up,

you will come out like a storm, you will be like a cloud covering the land and you and all your

troops and many peoples with you, another passage in 38, 15, 17, you will come from your place out

of the remote parts of the north, you and many peoples with you, all of them riding on horses,

a great assembly, a mighty army, and you will come against my people Israel like a cloud to cover

the land. It shall come about in the last days and I will bring you against my land. In Revelation 20,

it says that Satan led out of the pit at the end of the millennium, he goes out to Gather

Gogmegag and he says that the number of people he's able to gather is like the sands of the sea.

So my point here is that if you're going to stay true to the text, what you need is an incredible

amount of people coming against, marching against Israel. Another way to see that this is not okay to

just say this is missile barrages is because the bearing of the bones, Ezekiel 39 talks about

how after God supernaturally destroys this massive force, they've got to deal with all these

dead bodies. It's a bird feast, bones everywhere. So again, you could say, well, Chris, you don't

understand this is all going to spiral out of control and it's going to be lots and lots of ground

troops. Iran is going to come up with all these massive ground troops and Russia is going to

get a lot of ground troops and that's what's going to happen. Okay, fine. If we get to that point,

fine. Let's talk again, but right now we're just not that's just that's a very important

requirement is massive ground troops for this to be to be a match. Another thing that would argue

against this being a match is that it seems to me the point of the Gogmegag war is that God

protects supernaturally Israel from its enemies and so every missile or whatever that lands in

Israel is a minor argument against the idea that this is the Gogmegag war. You could say, well,

the armies are kind of come later and it's only or maybe it's about nuclear weapons and

you know, all that's going to happen in the future. Okay, fine, but currently this can't be

anything to do with it until you have that supernatural protection event. And so that's sort of

the key component of the Gogmegag war and without that, it's certainly not a match. Another argument

against this is the mismatch with the nations involved. And this is interesting because I think

it's mostly the idea that Iran is involved. That is the one thing that people are using here because

that nation is involved in Gogmegag as E.C. 3839 says that Persia is involved and Persia could be

argued to be modern day Iran. And then of course you have the Hellenzi idea that

Meshak means Moscow and that somehow Megag is Russia. And though I would argue stringently

against that idea and say that that is a Cold War non even read Hellenzi's initial

argumentation on that it's it's completely nonsensical in my opinion. But I've also done a

3.5 plus hour thing on Gogmegag you can check it out on YouTube it's called Gogmegag Chris White

all parts in one video or something like that. But I've done lots of work on the Gogmegag war

including going through the nations involved. But let's set aside the Russia situation for now

let's just assume okay it's part of it too. But it's not but let's assume that it is you've

still got the problem of the nations not matching up and there's like a lot of nations here that

have nothing to do with this conflict. For example Meshak-Tubal-Gomar, Beth Tegarama, etc all

of those are explicitly Eastern Turkey. They're all sons of J-Path in the table of nations.

You can go do this a million different ways that the cities in many cases are still named that

or it's just obviously Eastern Turkey and they're they're not involved in this. You could think

of it as a Syria so they've got to be involved. And now you've got another problem Ethiopia and

Libya are also mentioned so they're not even kind of involved in this and they've got to send

armies and be gathered together by Gog and stuff like that. It's just not a match it's not even

close. I would say again these nations are better understood if you believe John in Revelation 20

that the Gogh Megagwar occurs at the end of the millennium. And the reason for that is that in the

millennium Israel will be what's known as greater Israel. Greater Israel is a term that means the

amount of Israel that was given to Abraham initially. Israel never conquered this much land but they

were supposed to and that land stretched from the Nile River on the west side all the way to the

Euphrates River on the east side. And so you hear that in millennial language in the Bible talking

about from the Nile to the Euphrates. It's a reference to this expanded version of Israel that

exists in the millennium. And if you superimpose greater Israel onto a map of the Middle East right

now, you'll immediately be struck with the with the neighbors of greater Israel. And they're all

Megagmyshek, Tubalgomer, Bethegharma, Ethiopia, Libya, Amperia. If you look at it in that land,

you're like, oh, that's why these nations are mentioned because they're all next door neighbors

to greater Israel. They're all a part of the millennium but also not part of the millennium.

You know, that's the millennial language that there is nations during the millennium. You know,

they have to Jesus rules with an iron rod and they get rain or not rain. You know, it's not a

perfect world. The nations are still there, but they're not. Those nations aren't exactly part

of greater Israel. And so that's why a coalition is formed there and it all makes sense in that

context. But again, it doesn't matter if you believe that or not. The main point is that the

current nations that we're looking at are not a match. Full stop. I keep making arguments

about the millennium. So let me just go ahead and hit that really quick. Again, I've talked about

this in several places. Just Google Gog Megog, Chris White on YouTube. You'll see much more in-depth

arguments. But Revelation 27 through 10 says, when the thousand years are completed, Satan will be

released from his prison and will come out to deceive the nations, which are in the four corners

of the earth, Gog and Megog, together them together for war. The number of them is like the sand of

the seashore and they came up on the broad plain of the earth and surrounded the camps, the camp

of the saints and the beloved city and fire came down from heaven and devoured them.

The argument here is that John is giving you a four-verse summary of the two chapters of

Ezekiel 38 and 39. He brings out everything that's important about Ezekiel 38 and 39 and summarizes

it. Ezekiel 38 and 39, as we just looked at, spends a lot of time telling us which nations are

involved and et cetera. John simply sums that up by saying their nations from the four corners

of the earth, which is perfectly a great summary. It's in fact, of course, the Noroth is the

J-Path cohort of Turkey, the East is Persia, South is Ethiopian, West is Libya, just look at a map

that is a perfect summary of that concept. They're gathered together to war, certainly that is a

big part of his Ezekiel 38 and 39, his gathering together with the nations, his, you know, thinking

his heart to do this, talks about the sand of the seashore people. Again, we already look at that.

The language in Ezekiel 38 and 39 couldn't be clear. The amounts of people, you're like,

there's this huge gathering of armies. It says that so many different ways summarized here.

And of course, the coming on the beloved city and fire coming down from heaven. Ezekiel 38 and 39

spends a lot more time on this, but Revelation 20 sums it up. I believe that context helps us to

really understand my next point, which is the peace and safety language in Ezekiel 38 and 39

simply does not fit the current context. And this, by the way, is one of the biggest problems with

putting Ezekiel 38 and 39 in any kind of situation before the 70th week begins. And that's this

peace language that's said in several different ways in Ezekiel 38 and 39, these people,

they're living securely, all of them, as it says in Ezekiel 38, this land of unwalled villages.

I will go up against those who are at rest that live securely, all of them living without

walls and having no bars or gates. These people who have acquired cattle and goats live at the

center of the world. So therefore, prophesied, I sent a man to say to God, thus says, Lord God,

on that day, my people, Israel, who are living securely. In other words, this is not a picture of

Israel for the last, whatever, however many years you want. It explicitly says that nobody has

walls or gates or bars. I mean, there's walls in Israel and they're there for protection and they

constantly are getting hit by Israel rockets. If you want to, I've read a book, I think it was

recently that talked about this just constant fear that everybody has in Israel. You just grow up

with it. You've got to be a part of the army. You know, you just live in this existential doom

as a part of the citizen of Israel. It couldn't be further from the language of Ezekiel 38 and 39.

Again, it only makes sense. The kind of emphasis that it puts on this peace and safety is only

best described when John says it occurs after the millennium of peace. A time when they've beaten

their swords into ploughshares for a thousand years, these are people who do not have walls or gates.

That's when you fit that in. People say, oh, well, there's a false peace coming at the first part

of the 70th week of Daniel. Maybe that's when this happens. Okay. Well, now you've got another problem

and that is the language at the end of Ezekiel 38 and 39, which talks about how this is sort of

a culmination of all history and things. So for example, Ezekiel 38, let's take it from

6, Ezekiel 39, 6. And I will send fire upon Megag and those who inhabit the coastlands and safety.

And they will know that I'm the Lord. So whatever happens, this is a summation of what's going to

happen after the end of the God, Megag war. Okay. And God says, once I send fire on Megag, then they

are going to know that I'm the Lord. Okay. Next line, my holy name, I will make known and the

midst of my people Israel, and I will not let my holy name be profaned anymore. And the nations

will know that I am the Lord, the holy one in Israel. So this, this war is intended to be,

you know, a big signpost that says, God is God. There's no arguing about that anymore. No one is

going to profane his name anymore. And I would argue that that line by itself limits you to put this

at the end of the millennium. You certainly can't put it before the seven-year period, because

if you think the Ezekiel 38 and 39 war will end before the beginning or really any time during the

seven-year period, you're going to have God's name profane again, you know, whether it's the Antichrist,

sitting in the temple, a whole bunch of people profaning God's name there certainly during Armageddon.

You know, you really don't have any place to put that until, and I would say you can't even put

it at Armageddon for this, because you have explicitly the war in Revelation 20 in which Satan

gathers nations that are like the sand of the sea to go to war against the living God in Jerusalem.

So yeah, you're going to have God's name profaned on that army, I'm sure, too. So the only place

that this even makes sense is the end of the millennium. And I would say that the only two peer-reviewed

papers I've ever seen on the timing of the Gogmagog war in Ezekiel 38 and 39 agree with me that the

only place to put it is at the end of the millennium. A lot of their argument, whether that's J. Paul Tanner

or Ralph Alexander and their Seminole papers, I think, they argue, for example, the language of

Ezekiel 38 and 39, things like in the last days, you know, they can, these are terms that are

millennial. There were less or I would say they would say Messianic. In other words, the Messiah

has to have been here during this. Okay, let me shift gears a little bit and talk about some other

aspects of the end times and trying to figure if this has anything to do with that. I think some

people would simply say that this is the end times because it's the birth pains of Matthew 24.

And I went through this in a much in much more detail in a place called three reasons I don't

think we're in the end times yet. And there I talked about the idea that Matthew 24's birth pains,

which is false Christs, wars, famines, earthquakes, celestial signs, they only recently, I think

John Walver probably was the guy that basically said that birth pains have been happening, you know,

have been starting since, you know, basically 2000 years ago. In other words, this idea that the

best way to interpret Matthew 24's birth pains is that they're sort of, you know, randomly increasing

at some unknown time. It's not really bound by any specific time frame. You know, if you see an

earthquake or a famine, you can say, ah, there we are. That's just the birth pains happening.

And they used to believe that they would, you know, they used to teach anyway that these things

would increase in frequency and intensity over time. That could be argued that that's not happening,

certainly famines have decreased significantly and different things like that. But I think the

point is moot. And the reason is that I think you can do a study of the birth pains in Matthew 24

and the six seals of Revelation six and see that they map to one another. Even pre-tribalational

scholars like John McArthur acknowledged this parallel, the key insight is that these birth

pains don't begin until the first seal is opened. That is to say, the anti-Christ appears in the

scene. That's the first seal, the writer on the white horse in Revelation six. So if here's your

premise, if Revelation six and the first seal maps to the false Christs in, in other words, that

Matthew 24's birth pains are also chronological. False Christs, wars, famines, earthquakes, celestial

signs, and the celestial signs really being the key ingredient because that is what we can really

hang our hat on, so to speak. The celestial sign, the sun moon and stars going dark, which is a

precursor to the day of the Lord. And that's how we can be really sure that we were on the right track.

Let alone the fact that false Christ starts in the birth pains and the anti-Christ starts at the

first seal and the wars and everything else matches. But the point is, if that is true, then you can't

just say a war and a rumor of wars happening. We must be in the end times because it's specifically

talking, if you will, about the beginning of the 70th week, the revelation of the man of sin,

which could be argued at the midpoint, but I would say that the false Christ starts at the beginning

of the 70th week of Daniel. And the wars and rumors of wars are specifically the wars of Daniel

11, 40 through 48 or somewhere around there, in which he is essentially defeating the first three

kings of the Ten King Confederacy. Those wars are also that unique word for rumor of war.

It's a pretty unique, rarely used Greek word, and if you convert it to the Septuagint, the Greek

version of the Old Testament, you can see that it's the same word used of those wars of the anti-Christ

in Daniel 11. So I would say that there's really good understanding there that the birth

pains are the seven-year period. And so if you believe, as I do, that we're not in the seven-year

period yet, because you haven't seen a covenant made with many, you certainly haven't seen

sacrifices start at the Temple Mount. So we know we're not in that yet.

Then no, you can't use the birth pains to just be whatever you want to, which has been sort of the

howl and z version of things for so many years. Okay, so let me get into what I think this could be.

And the only thing that I think this could be is very early stages of the start of the Ten King

system. And as I have reiterated in many different places, the Ten King system must exist first

before, way before the beginning of the seven-year period, you're going to have to have a Ten King

system, which is described in Daniel 7, Revelation 11 through 13. And Daniel 7 makes it explicit

in several ways that the end of Christ does not come on the scene until after this Ten King

system has already been ruling. The key passage there is 724, as for the Ten horns out of this

kingdom. Ten kings will arise. And another, speaking of the Antichrist, will arise after them.

And he will be different from the previous ones. And we'll subdue three kings. And so this is

spoken of in different ways in Daniel 724. But the idea that he shows up after this Ten has already

been ruling. And he goes after three of them. Now, you could argue that this Ten King Confederacy,

I guess you could say it already exists in some manner, or that it could exist, you know,

maybe it doesn't exist, but it could be come together really quickly. And then he could subdue

three of them. All those are certainly possibilities. But I would submit that, you know, if the Ten King

thing is some kind of thing that you really can't see, like it's some kind of spiritual thing,

or you've got to know some secret noses to know who the Ten Kings are, like, then I don't know,

then I don't know that we have a map anymore to figure anything out. But if the Ten King Confederacy

is a real thing that will exist in the future, and like you will know that there's a Ten King

something, and that the Antichrist defeats three of them, and then they give their authority

to him after they recognize he's obviously way more powerful than them. And then he essentially rules

kind of co-rules, but he really is just given that whole kingdom. If that's something that you're

going to be able to see, then we're not there yet, because a Ten King thing doesn't exist yet.

But to make my point, I've got to make one more argument, and that is something I've made elsewhere,

and that is that the Seven Headed Ten Horned Beast, which kind of shows up in Daniel 7, and certainly

in Revelation, is interpreted by the angel as representing successive kingdoms. Five have fallen,

one is, so it's typically understood, the one that is is Rome, for example, and the one is yet to

come, which is the Antichrist kingdom, and it sort of has two stages, but that's another scenario.

I want to suggest that what unites all of those things, every single one of those

beast heads in the past, Egypt, a Syria, Babylon, Meadow, Persia, Greece, Rome, every beast had

exercised sovereign control over the Jewish people and their land. Rome is the clearest example

of this, because it was happening during the Bible time, so we see, for example, that Israel couldn't

execute their own criminals without Roman permission. They were a vassal state, and all of those

previous heads are our previous conquerors of Israel. Israel was not the master of their domain,

and I don't mean that a empire once controlled the dirt of Israel, it's incredibly important

for this theory that he controlled the people of Israel, that Israel was in some way a nation

at the time, and that they were controlled by another entity. This is a little bit of a pet theory

of mine, but I would certainly like to argue the point with somebody. It seems that this is the

best argument for why these beasts heads are heads, but that in combination with the previous

point that I mentioned, which is that the Ten Kings must exist first before the Antichrist shows up,

because Antichrist shows up in opposition to that Ten King Confederacy. Again, plug that into your

end time scenario and make that fit, because the Antichrist has to be against your enemy,

and that's hard for people to reconcile. But if those two premises are true, then if you were to

ask me if this current war has anything to do with anything, which I'm not sure that it does,

I think it could very easily be nothing, or just another geopolitical war, which is going to be

over in two days or whatever, and yes, there'll be implications and problems and oil prices,

and who knows what else geopolitically. But if it is anything, it would have to ultimately end

in something that I don't think is on anybody's radar, and at the very least I kind of want to be

on record saying this, so that in the future, whether I'm dead or still alive, people can point

to this and say, this guy was saying this was going to happen, and maybe it'll give me credibility

in the future, and maybe people will listen to me. But if those two premises are true, it means

that Israel has to lose the sovereignty. In other words, what I would expect to see if this was,

in fact, a precursor to the Ten Kings, would be that Israel loses, America loses, and that

something grows around the Mediterranean, a new system in this scenario, if it happens this early,

it looks like it would be like a Muslim thing. I know Joel Richardson would be happy about that,

because it would look like Joel Richardson's thing is coming true. You can read my book,

The Islamic Antichrist Debunked, in which I show, I believe conclusively that Joel Richardson simply

isn't right about any number of things, but I could see that being the case. Israel loses its

sovereignty. It's no longer a thing controlled by Israel. It's controlled by whoever wins this war,

and that that would exist for a long period of time in some state, maybe a month, maybe two

years, maybe two decades, maybe 200 years. It doesn't matter, but Israel would be controlled by

another head, a ten nation thing, and that eventually a guy shows up, and he defeats specifically

the nations that are mentioned there in Daniel 11. Nobody seems to think about this, but the

nations that the Antichrist goes to war with is our Muslim nations. He's going to war against a

Syria, and Egypt, and so on. The Antichrist is in opposition to Muslim nations, and those three

kings that he destroys our Muslim. This all makes sense in order for this to be anything,

in my opinion, it could possibly be a very early precursor to what ultimately would need to exist

for a long period of time, which is to say a ten nation control of Israel. That's the only way

that the Antichrist is going to be able to make use of this. He's going to come on the scene as

a savior. He's going to destroy the immediate local enemies of Israel. By the way, the historic

and Israel enemies, the whole thing about going after Ammon and all that stuff in Daniel 11,

is prophesied of the Messiah to do in Isaiah 11. In other words, the people of Israel are going to be

like, hey, this guy's fulfilling scripture to the letter. When he defeats those three kings,

the Antichrist, man, he's going to really look like a good guy, because we've all been living

under the boot of this 10-king thing for a while, and here is a guy who has some sort of ability

to defeat what we thought were undefeatable people, and he's not his first order of business

to give the Jews their land back and to start the temple sacrifices and to do everything.

And by the way, the Jewish people have this from what I can tell largely abandoned anything to do

with like technical stuff with the scripture. You can think about it like after the

Jesus and everything else, they really went to this rabbinic system where they really didn't

rely on the scriptures as much. It's mostly spiritualizing stuff. It says it, but it doesn't

really mean it. And when it comes to the end times, and I talk about this in my book, False Christ,

they're kind of down to like one thing. And that is the guy who builds the temple, he's the Messiah,

that's all we need to know. You don't need to pay attention to really anything else. It's good

if he does some of those things, sure, but building the temple is the thing. A guy who builds the

temple and destroys our enemies, that's the guide. No more discussion needed. We don't have to

investigate that. If a guy does that, that's the end. Anyway, but if you were to ask me,

where is this all going in Iran? What's it all going to? I would say probably not that. I don't

even think we're there yet. I think this probably goes away. But if it doesn't go away, then it could

be the beginning of a snowball that does lead to a complete reorienting of that system,

in which Israel know, and we're not ready for that. I think there's going to be a massive

disillusionment among Christians who are either waiting for the rapture to happen in a minute,

or waiting for some kind of thing like this to happen, and then to have them not only lose a war,

but lose so badly that Israel isn't even a nation anymore. How do you even reconcile that

in the modern Bible prophecy world? I think that we lose heart, and I hope that it's a good thing.

I hope that it causes us to be introspective and to think, okay, well, maybe we should start

paying attention to what the Bible says and not what the newspapers say. I know we all want the

Lord to return, but let's be sober about it. And let's be diligent in the study of the scriptures

to make sure that we're good watchmen, because in my view, if you get this wrong, you could be

worshiping the wrong guy in the end times. You think you wouldn't worship the end of Christ? Well,

that's only because you've made sure that the end of Christ is your enemy, whatever your enemy is,

you know, and you're saying to yourself, well, I wouldn't worship my enemy. Well, he's not going

to come on the scene as your enemy. He's going to come on the scene as a false Messiah, a false

Christ, an anti-Christ. So anyway, I hope this helps, and we'll catch you next time. Bye.