
About this episode
Economist Podcasts is made possible by:
Donald Trump’s stance on immigration helped him win the presidency. Our correspondent asks if a backlash against the campaign could damage Republican midterm prospects. Reddit is struggling in an age of AI. And the enduring beauty of the Bayeux tapestry.
Guests and host:
- Aryn Braun, West Coast correspondent
- Shera Avi-Yonah, business correspondent
- Alexandra Suich Bass, culture editor
- Rosie Blau, co-host of “The Intelligence”
- Jason Palmer, co-host of “The Intelligence”
Topics covered:
- Deportation, ICE, immigration, Minneapolis
- Reddit, Google, AI
- Bayeux tapestry, 1066, British Museum
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to The Economist.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Economist Podcasts publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
256 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Economist Podcasts — Ire and ICE: the toll of America’s deportations. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
Harvard Business School Executive Education delivers breakthrough learning for leaders, stimulating classes led by faculty at the forefront of their fields. Topics that will define the future of business, discussions that transform perspectives and ways of thinking, and access to the brightest business minds on the planet. Learn more at hbs.me-breakthrough. That's hbs.me-breakthrough. This intelligence podcast is sponsored by Business Travel on Hotels.com. Does booking business travel feel like another job? Hotels.com makes booking work trips easy and rewarding. It's easy because you can set your preferences once and get results tailored to your business travel needs every time. It's rewarding because with Hotels.com's free rewards program, you can save instantly on your next work trip and earn rewards for future travel. Book faster with confidence at Hotels.com, loyalty members 18 plus.
The Economist. Hello and welcome to the intelligence from the Economist. I'm Rosie Blur. And I'm Jason Palmer. Today on the show has read it, had it, in the age of AI, and the biotapeistry conquers Britain. First up though. Donald Trump has been talking about how he'd deal with illegal immigrants since long before he was elected for a second term. The Republican platform promises to launch the largest deportation operation in the history of our country. And he certainly followed through on that promise.
Openly on the streets of Minneapolis, Chicago and elsewhere, and in recent months, much more quietly. But is a policy that helped elect Trump as president now taking a political toll? Barack Obama, a Democrat, was known as a deportor in chief. He removed something like 430,000 people in 2013. Our in-broad is our West Coast correspondent. And he did that by focusing on recent border crossers and people in jails and prisons. Donald Trump has to do something much different because the border is quiet. So he's focusing on the interior of the country arresting people on streets in their homes, and that's much more visible to the American people. Our in-how many people have been deported since Trump took office for a second time? This is a great question, Rosie. And we don't actually know the answer because
the Trump administration has not published official removal statistics since the president took office in January 2025. But the administration claims that they have deported a million people and about 2.2 million more have left voluntarily. Now, that's just what a Department of Homeland Security spokesman is telling me in an email. But the direction of travel is certainly becoming clear. In July, ICE arrested 50,000 people. That's a record for the agency. Immigration judges are issuing removal orders at a remarkable pace. So we can see the campaign is really starting to ramp up at this point. And you say the focus for this administration is people who've been living in the states for a long time. Who are these people? I wouldn't say the administration is focusing specifically on those people, but because they need to focus on interior arrests rather than people are just walking across the border, those folks who have been living in the US for potentially
decades are getting caught up in the dragnet. And so you have people who perhaps have been undocumented for decades that are getting caught up in the Massey Protection Campaign. But you also have this novel legal strategy that the administration is using to strip people who are in America legally of their legal status. You think about Haitians in Ohio, for example, who have temporary protected status, who are now being fitted with ankle monitors and who are now vulnerable to deportation. People who were let in on humanitarian parole during the Biden administration are now vulnerable to deportation. And this is a novel strategy we've never really seen anything like this from other presidents before. Earlier in the year, we had extraordinary scenes in Minneapolis. There were thousands of federal agents on the streets. Two people were killed in those protests. And yet we haven't seen anything like that for some months now. So what's going on? Yeah, I think that
that was sort of the Minneapolis effect, right? Like Americans were really horrified by what they saw on the streets in Minneapolis border patrol agents assaulting protesters, like you say, two American citizens killed. And the administration really was on the back foot after that. I think it's fair to say they sacked Christy Known, the Department of Homeland Security Secretary Tom Homen, Gutsenton, Donald Trump's borders are to kind of clean up the mess. And so after that things really quieted down, you had Mark Wain Mullin come in to lead DHS. He was a senator for Oklahoma. He said in his confirmation hearing, he didn't want to be in the news. He wanted to do kind of quiet, effective job. And he's been aided by $70 billion more dollars that Congress has now appropriated for immigration enforcement. And so now I think the mass deportation campaign is much quieter. It's a bit less visible, but it's even more effective. And it's still aggressive. I mean, if you think about, for example, the way that ICE agents are using technology to target
people, there's court testimony that shows an agent saying that he pulls up an app on his phone created by Palantir. And it basically gives them a map. He says like Google Maps in which he can see all of the potential immigrants that they might be able to target in the area that they're in. And that's how they make their target lists. So it's still an incredibly aggressive campaign. It's just not as focused on these showy theatrical rates. So what happens after people are arrested? As you say, lots of people are being targeted. Presumably, there isn't reason to deport all of them. Can they argue their case? So after an immigrant gets picked up by ICE, they go through proceedings in immigration court. And these courts are run by the Department of Justice. It's not an independent court system by any means. I went to an immigration court in Los Angeles for half of a day just to sit in on proceedings and see what they were like. And they, courts are so overcrowded with cases.
Judges are hearing, you know, what folks are calling these mega master hearings, which is 50 cases, 100 cases in a three hour setting. Immigrants and their families are clogging the hallways, judicial buildings, the judge that I was watching just had his eyes trained on the clock the whole time he was so worried about getting through, you know, the 96 cases that he had on the docket that morning. And these hearings are being changed around. Immigrants aren't getting as much notice for when they need to show up in court. If they show up in court, they might be unprepared. They might not have a lawyer. They might not show up at all. And I think that's part of the administration strategy. If a migrant doesn't show up in court, they can be ordered removed in absentia. It's called. And that's a way for the administration to just continue to rack up more removal orders. And what do ordinary Americans think about all of this? This is the million dollar question that I'm thinking a lot about as we head into the midterms. Donald Trump has campaigned on immigration. It's been the issue that arguably has won him both
of his campaigns. But now his net approval rating for immigration is underwater. Americans, writ large are not happy with the level of force that ICE has been using to carry out the deportation campaign. Roughly half of Americans say they support abolishing ICE. And one of the most interesting things that I'm tracking is how Hispanic voters are reacting to the mass deportation campaign. They really helped Donald Trump secure his victory in 2024. He had record support among Hispanic voters. But more than other ethnic groups, Hispanics do not like what is going on with ICE. There are 10 percentage points more likely to say they want to abolish the agency. And so that might have a big effect on who wins Swingy House seats in South Texas or in California, for example. Americans were promised a deportation campaign that would go after criminals in gang members. And that's not what's being delivered. Aaron, we can hear more from you on this
subject on the current edition of checks and balance. Yes, John Prado and James Bennett and I talk at length about deportations as well as a reporting trip I just took to the border to see how the border wall is finally being built. And there's also been a discussion about this on insider as well. So lots of other things to listen to. Aaron, thank you so much. Thank you, Rosie. This economist podcast is sponsored by Bill, the intelligent finance platform that helps businesses and accounting firms scale with proven results. With AI-powered automation, Bill isn't just moving money. They're simplifying financial operations for nearly half a million customers. Bill has securely processed over a trillion dollars in transactions. That's proven infrastructure. Ready to talk with an expert? Visit bill.com slash proven and get a $150 gift card
as a thank you. That's bill.com slash proven terms and conditions apply. See offer page for details. In a world where AI is changing every role and every industry, knowing who actually has deep expertise matters more than ever. Upwork connects you with the highly skilled freelance professionals with proven track records so you can hire with confidence. Upwork gives your business fast access to highly skilled specialists with deep expertise so you can fill critical skill gaps, launch projects faster, and scale support up or down without committing to full-time headcount. With business plus, you can access the top 1% of talent on Upwork. AI-powered short listing delivers a curated short list of top freelancers match to your goals in under six hours. No endless searching required. Thousands of growing businesses already trust Upwork to hire highly skilled freelance professionals for everything from one-off projects to ongoing support. It's free to sign up and posting a job is easy. Visit Upwork.com right now and post your job for free. That is Upwork.com to connect with top talent ready to help your business grow.
That's UPWORK.com. Upwork.com Reddit is one of those places on the internet that can feel bottomless. It's a sort of self-governing internet forum whose design encourages diversity. Whatever your interest or curiosity or obsession, there's a sub-reddit for it. It builds itself as the heart of the internet, but there are palpitations. Reddit's shareholders are rightly worried about what happens to all that sweet, sweet human generated stuff in the era of AI. Reddit has had a difficult time as of late. Its share price has dropped by about a third this year. Shira Avayonna is a business correspondent for the economist. If you've done a Google search lately, you might have noticed one reason why. That AI generated box at the top above the old school 10 blue links. Investors worry that if people get their
information from that box and not from links like sites to Reddit, that will hurt its traffic and therefore its business. So before we get into what sort of business model troubles it's got, what is its business model? So Reddit's executives like to say that it's kind of neither fish nor foul. It's not quite social media and in fact it kind of harkens back to the old forums of the early internet in the 90s. So some of its business is like Instagram, which generates profit from an ads business that's based on serving users, things that might be relevant to them. But some of it is also like Wikipedia in that it relies very heavily on an army of volunteer moderators that police their individual sub forums or subreddits in its parliance. And in fact, this kind of tension between being kind of like social media but kind of not has caused Reddit problems in the past. So for example, in 2023, many of Reddit's volunteer moderators went on strike after the company
announced that it would start charging for access to its application programming interface or API, which many independent developers used to kind of build apps off Reddit. But in the end, the platform stuck with the policy and in fact, at the time it may not have had small developers in mind because the following year it announced deals with Google and OpenAI who reportedly agreed to pay 60 and 70 million dollars a year to use Reddit's data to, in part, train AI chatbots like chat GPT. And why is Reddit's data worth so much to the likes of Google and OpenAI? So a study commissioned by the company showed that at least among many leading American chatbots, Reddit is the most cited source. And one super valuable use of its data is generating product recommendations. So some really popular subreddits like Bite for Life, but also my personal favorite skincare addiction have a really passionate community of people that will give you honest,
non-sponsored product reviews. And Reddit says that about 40% of conversations across the site as a whole relate to commercial activity in some shape or form and a lot of that is shopping. And having that kind of corpus of high quality reviews and in fact human debate about well which dishwasher lasts longer and which hairdryer is better is really useful for AI chatbots that want to generate their own shopping recommendations. And in fact, themselves one day hope to make revenue off of presenting products to users and then taking a cut when they buy them. So in turn they want to make recommendations and sell ads against them. So Reddit has sold its golden goose already though to these chatbot makers. As of late, Google's relationship with Reddit in particular has become a bit less of a two-way street. So for years it directed a lot search traffic reddit's way. You can think of the kind of classic search tool of just appending
Reddit to your query if you wanted results from Reddit comments. But as Google steers people away from sending them to other sites and toward its own kind of AI overview of information that might affect Reddit's traffic investors worry. Reddit stock tickets largest ever single day plunge in July after it said that quote choppy search referrals may have hurt. And independent data suggests that the average amount of time per user spent on reddit's app has been dropping to in recent months. So what's to be done then given that this relationship is already sort of set in stone. So Reddit has two main options. One is to bargain for a better deal with Google and other companies now that it knows just how valuable its data is. And the company is reportedly working on negotiating those agreements. Although it hasn't said whether or not it's committed to re-upping
the ones that it made several years ago. It's also sued a number of AI companies with whom it didn't make agreements saying that they illegally used its data to train AI chatbots anyway. And if it wins those lawsuits that might give it useful leverage in future negotiations if it decides to go down that route. But I think the second path is probably the one that reddit's executives have suggested they would prefer, which is rather than becoming a kind of data mine for other companies to attract more users to come to its site and even more its app directly without needing to be referred either from a chatbot or from search. So in its last earnings call, its boss Steve Huffman said that traffic from search is not where the business lives. And it hopes that more people will create an account log into the app and that that will help it make its ads business, which is growing really rapidly already, the kind of cornerstone of its
revenue rather than training deals. Any specific skincare recommendations for me on the basis of what you've learned on reddit? We're sunscreen. I really like the cheap Japanese ones that you can get in convenience stores there. Right. Not sponsored. The brands are available. Sure. Thanks very much for your time. Thanks, Jason. On a sultry summer night as a slumbering London slipped into the witching hour. I made my way to the British Museum. Alexandra Sewich Bass is the economist culture editor.
Standing in a loading bay, I waited until a truck loomed out of the darkness. Shopped by a police escort from an undisclosed location in France. This delivery is why we were all here to witness a homecoming some 900 years in the making. An enormous crate was unloaded and ushered inside. There a small army of curators began the breathless task of unfurling its cargo, slowly revealing an epic saga of war and conquest. You start to get these kind of glimpses of the story that you're used to and you're going to predict what the next kind of bit is. So a bit geeky really but it was just amazing just to kind of say oh my gosh and we're going to see this now and that's going to come off. Stretching the length of a Boeing 747, the biotapestry is the only surviving work of medieval art of its size. Though it was likely stitched in England, it's named after the French town where it's lived for close to a millennium. It's much anticipated exhibition at the
British Museum is the first outside of France. The tapestry depicts William the Bastard turned conquerors invasion of England in 1066. It begins with England's childless king Edward, sending a noble man named Harold to Normandy. Once there he befriends William and appears to swear an oath that William should have the crown. But when Edward dies, Harold breaks his promise and claims the throne. High above the cosmos voice their displeasure. Haley's comet blazes across the sky an omen of doom. Then comes the war. William and his Norman countrymen are easily identified by their odd hairstyle. Long locks in the front shaved bald in the back. Their English rivals, meanwhile, sport my stashes. Medieval as the scene is, there's something immediately legible about it.
It has that kind of three-dimensional look, those cartoon-like characters that have an immediacy, don't they, that makes you kind of quite familiar with it. Michael Lewis is one of the curators behind the new exhibition. It's a sort of style that we're familiar with nowadays, in other ways, say, from someone cartoon books or graphic novels. You know, there's something about that that you kind of easily kind of relate to. Indeed, this bit is cartoonishly brutal. The battlefield is strewn with stripped corpses, felled horses, flying arrows and pointed suffering. Harold is killed, English troops flee. William is victorious. And then... We don't know how it ends, do we? No. That's because the end of the tapestry is missing. It's theorized that at once showed William's triumphant coronation, but no one knows for sure.
One expert told me it could have gone on for a few centimeters or even a few meters. But this era of mystery is part of what makes it so compelling. I think things that you have to kind of fill in the blanks are more alluring that if everything is, I don't want to use the phrase nail down because that feels unfortunate for a tapestry, but I think the fact that there is something missing, it kind of actually invites you in, as both a narrative, but, you know, as a supreme piece of medieval art, to engage with it and think about why it was made what's missing, what it means. It's an object of your presence. As Nick Colinan, the British Museum's director explained to me, much of the tapestry's creation remains unknown. The Commission that made it and how it was actually all done, you know, with 70 plus meter tapestry, the physical acts of embroidering that, how many hands, you know, probably women, probably men's, it's probably done outside because of the light. I just think the idea of like all of these men sitting in a field is,
I mean, something that's so monumental, but is so intimate in its making is really interesting. Whoever held the needle, their work still has so much to offer. The richly embroidered linen teams with 737 animals and 627 people. There are the Latin phrases, the Asop's fables and the margins, the oddly prominent genitalia, and then there's all the timestamps that's collected over the centuries. The little artistic liberties restores have taken, an arrow hitting an eye here, a man wrapped in a vine there. And of course, there's the story of its survival, how it dodged being ripped up for wagon covers during the French Revolution, Napoleon's fondness for its visions of victory over the English, the Nazis' efforts to steal it. At its heart, it evokes unchanging themes of the human experience, promises and power, suffering and salvation.
The people who living through that, I mean, just the kind of strife and turmoil that they would have experienced around them. And if you think of the women who embroidered the tapestry, then they probably would be reflecting on some of this as they do their stitches. You know, they're scenes of women experiencing violence, there's scenes of howls that's being plundered, there's scenes of men being killed, so this probably would have hit them pretty hard as they were creating this and the movie. It's a tableau that is tragic as it is timeless. A world ravaged by violence, survivors seeking solace and understanding in art. These threads stretch across time and generations. That's it for this episode of The Intelligence. We'll see you back here tomorrow.
I'm Serena Williams and I'm healthier on row. Then I thought, what if I've scaled businesses? What am I scaled my philanthropy? What if I did as much in one year as I've done in my whole life? See how your wealth could have even greater meaning at creativeplaning.com slash impact. I'm Serena Williams and I'm healthier on row. I've lost 34 pounds in a year with GLP1's diet and exercise. On row, you can access GLP1 options, including the first FDA approved GLP1 pill for weight loss. Go to row.co slash journey to see if you qualify. 14 to 20% average weight loss in one year in non-diabetics with obesity or overweight with weight-related medical condition versus 2.2% to 3.1% in placebo art. RX only. To stay informed about serious side effects, go to row.co slash safety.
More episodes
More from Economist Podcasts

The Weekend Intelligence: Shire folk
Economist Podcasts

Out-numbered: AI’s contentious maths milestone
Economist Podcasts

Working through it: the AI jobs boom dawns
Economist Podcasts

TRAILER: Shire folk
Economist Podcasts