Islamic terror strikes in Texas and Virginia & Iran’s regime collapse

In this political Coliseum, we slay the rising beast with the fateful sword of truth that

transcends hypocrisy and censorship.

It's time to unleash yourself from the tyrants of media propaganda on the America out loud

talk radio network.

This is Unleashed, the political news out.

Welcome to Unleashed, the political news hour on the Canary House and there's so much

that has gone on this week so trying to narrow it down has been a difficult

decision but I do want to start off by talking about the state of the

Union speech that Trump gave. It really doesn't get much better than that.

There was some real key takeaways from it and one of the biggest things that

happened during the speech and I think this is a game changer for the

Republicans during the midterms is Trump basically made a call for all

representatives to stand up if they agreed with a statement and that statement

was that the first duty of the legislature is to look after the interests

or the safety of the American people over illegal aliens and lo and behold the

Democrats of course refused to stand and I got to tell you the optics on this

looked really really bad.

So I think that is going to be a commercial that is going to run every day

during the midterm elections as it should. It was shocking to see Democrats

not stand on a clear question that they should have been standing for which is

who do you put first the American citizen or illegal aliens?

You know it never stops but we keep getting more and more stories of illegal

aliens, arming American citizens and of course this week there was another one

where a Muslim illegal alien with 30 arrests stabbed a woman to death in

Fredericksburg, Virginia. This man had had more than 30 arrests for charges of

rape malicious wounding assault firing a weapon and yet you know he was

somehow out and living free and murdered a woman at a bus stop

and so this is a just a one more example of why what Trump is doing is exactly

what needs to happen. This is you know a ongoing problem in America

today and you know and it's always in the sanctuary states or these

Democrat runstakes are Democrat run cities or this kind of thing is

happening. Of course now with the war going on in Iran we could

probably expect to see more of this type of thing. Of course you had the

active shooter in Texas that gunned down you know I think two people actually

14 people were injured and two people were killed

but of course the man was wearing a t-shirt that said

property of Allah and underneath that he had an undershirt that had

the Iranian flag so you know all of this

falls on the Biden administration. They are 100% responsible

for all of these illegals who came in in the last four years

millions of them. Many of them no doubt

sleeper cells and people who mean us harm.

It's going to be tough you know and now and I want to speak to that for a

minute and we'll get into the the operations that are

happening in Iran later in the program but

I do want to speak to one thing here. I've heard that you know there was a

I've seen some of my friends on the conservative side of you know who have

spoken out against Trump involving us in the Iranian war.

I have seen where of course you have Masi and others

MTG even some of my local legislators have been

very outspoken against our involvement. I've got to say that

where is this coming from? I think it's coming from

fear that we are heading right back into a

Gulf War type situation or Afghanistan type situation

this is not that folks not at all. I think it's important

that you got to look at each and every scenario as its own

situation. One of the things that I think that was really

key here and why it was important is because in this case

you have a national government who has made it

its ambition to make it very clear of their goal

death to America, death to Israel. They chant this

every day in their parliament sessions.

They have also made it clear that they are not going to respect

any rules put on them to sanctions and that they are going to continue the

development of nuclear weapons. If you think

that a nuclear armed Iran with these psychopathic radical

Islamists who have a are not only developing nuclear

weapons but are actively working on ICBMs that's

intercontinental ballistic missiles. If you think that that is

acceptable then you're living in a hole.

A nuclear armed Iran is absolutely not acceptable. Now

Trump had a very difficult decision to make and he ran on no new

worse. However, there was an opportunity.

It's now coming out that the CIA had been basically

doing very close surveillance on the Itolecomini

that they knew where he was and they saw an opportunity and Trump

decided to act on it. That is leadership folks.

That's what that is. It's not over.

There's a lot that can still be judged as we progress through this

conflict and certainly I think the time will tell

whether the prosecution of this war is done in an appropriate way or not.

But I will tell you one thing for certain. It was

absolutely a necessity. I think for Trump to take out

and weaken this regime because appeasement has not worked

and will not work ever with those who are ideologically driven

by a prophetic belief that they will bring about

the final imam. These people are a death cult

and they must be destroyed. That's about all I'm going to say

about that in this segment. I've got to cut this segment a little bit short

and cut to a commercial break but when I come back

we're going to get into talking about some of the latest that has been going on

in lawsuits against several who were involved in pushing the

illegal experimental vaccine that has caused so much damage

and it's quite honestly taken a lot of lives. So I've got a really great guest

coming on for that. So stick with us. We'll be right back after short.

We'll get ready. My fellow Americans July 2nd 3rd and 4th

America out loud dot news in partnership with Clear and the Wellness

Company invites you to Nashville, Tennessee for a red, white and blue

celebration you'll never forget. We're saluted 250 years of America

and 10 incredible years of America out loud news.

Stand in strong for truth justice and the nation we all love.

Three days of high impact speakers, powerhouse voices,

delivering dynamic unforgettable insights that will fire up

your patriots spirit. And on July 4th, now brace yourself

because you'll experience America's most explosive fireworks show

lightning up downtown Nashville and pure patriotic glory.

You can reserve your spot with early bird pricing right now at americaoutloud.news

forward slash Nashville. It's America out loud news 2510 and Nashville,

even. Feeling drained or mentally foggy? Recharge with Wellness Company

combines methylene blue and uralithin A to support mitochondrial health

boost energy and enhance cognitive function. Visit twc.health forward slash

out loud and use code out loud for 20% of your first order. You wouldn't go a day

without brushing your teeth or washing your hands. What about washing your nose?

I mean your nose does filter the air you breathe air loaded with bacteria

viruses and irritants. Make nasal hygiene part of your routine with clear.

No messy bottles to fill, no drowning sensation.

Clear as a natural drug-free saline with the added benefit of xylitol,

which blocks bacterial and viral adhesion.

Available in stores and online at clear.com. That is x-l-e-a-r.com.

Thank you for joining us on this edition of Unleash the Political News Hour. We now

transition to our second segment where we will examine pressing developments

and accountability for public health policies and related legal actions.

I am pleased to welcome back Dr. Joseph Sandsone who will provide expert

analysis on a significant civil lawsuit currently

progressing in the Netherlands. This case filed by several Dutch citizens

alleges vaccine-related injuries stemming from COVID-19 vaccinations

and it names multiple defendants, including Bill Gates,

along with other prominent figures and entities. Dr. Sandsone,

as a key witness in the proceedings, will help us break down the allegations.

The court's recent jurisdictional rulings and the broader implications for claims

of misleading statements regarding vaccine safety and efficacy.

In addition, Dr. Sandsone will address his own ongoing legal efforts in Florida,

including his petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to classify mRNA vaccines as biological

and technological weapons of mass destruction under state law,

with the aim of securing injunction relief to halt their distribution.

This discussion promises valuable insights folks into the intersection of health policy

individual rights and judicial oversight. Dr. Sandsone, thank you so much again for your time

and expertise. Thanks for having me on, Ada. I really appreciate it. Yeah, luck going on.

So let's begin with this Dutch civil lawsuit and your role in it. What can you tell us about it?

So yeah, well, first of all, the writ of mandamus was my prior case. I'm on a second case now,

which I filed in December of 2024, but we'll get to that. But the folks in the Netherlands

reached out to me like shortly, I think after I filed that writ of mandamus, which was in 2024,

and I shared information with them. And their case is a civil case. It's against, it's on behalf

of seven plaintiffs, although one died, who were injured by the COVID or mRNA injections.

They've got high profile defendants in this case, including Bill Gates, as you mentioned,

Albert Burla of Pfizer, Mark Rutte, former Prime Minister against the Netherlands. He's current

the current secretary of NATO and other Dutch officials. In this case, it's pretty strong in that

it's not pulling back. It's alleging the crimes of genocide were committed and the distribution of

bio weapons against the human population in another lens, which you know, I agree with. So they

reached out to me and I was communicating with them. And I actually had a range for Dr. Francis

oil to testify for your listeners that don't know Dr. Francis Boyle was arguably the world's

leading legal authority on biological weapons. He lobbied for and drafted the biological weapons

and anti-terrorism act of 1989. He gave me an affidavit for my cases in Florida stating that the

injections are bio weapons. And so people need to understand that his expert opinion is not just an

expert opinion. It's legislative intent because he wrote the law. And so you know, the normal world

that would be a slam dunk. But so I had helped the range for Dr. Boyle to testify in this case like

in late 2024. And then about now the court did not know he was going to testify yet. It was going

to be a surprise. So the only people that knew were myself the attorneys. I think the other witnesses

knew at that point too. But it wasn't like publicly out. Now you know as well as I do, our

communications are all monitored. So you can't rule out foul play. But he unfortunately died about

three weeks after he agreed to testify. You know, as far as I don't know, we went to the hospital

and he died. And we really don't have any further information about that. But that's unfortunate.

I mean, for a lot of reasons, but you know, put to the case itself, it would be really hard to

censor or shadow van a case if Dr. Francis Boyle was testifying that these are bio weapons in that case

that would be really hard to censor because of who he was.

What I think is unique about what you're doing is there's a lot of people that talk about,

you know, the the COVID vaccines and you know, trying to make light or not make light but trying to

bring to light information about what is in these vaccines and information about, you know, how the

mRNA, you know, works really to modify the human body and how it creates a ton of problems. There's

a lot of research studies that have been done on this. You know, this is, you know, folks, this is not

conjecture. It's not, you know, conspiracy theory. This is legitimate medical science that is showing.

And in this case, legal definitions that have already been accepted. And so I think what's

unique about your cases that, you know, we've seen very few actual cases get filed. There's been

a lot of talk, but not a lot of, you know, not a lot of legal work on this. And I think that's one

of the things that's really important about what you're doing because without that, there can be no

accountability. Unless there is something adjudicated, there's really nothing that's going to happen to

any of anybody that perpetrated this. Yeah, I try, personally, I try to lead by example. And I think,

I think, you know, people need to file cases like I'm doing, but I'm going to cycle back to my case.

But, um, so let me, uh, I'm going to speak where to case and then the lens is at right now and then

I'm going to get into Dr. Boyle's legal views a little bit because so what happened was in October

of 2024, the, um, there was a motion to dismiss. And this case survived that. The court said, no,

this case is moving forward. And the court even said that like Bill Gates is under jurisdiction. He'll

need to appear at some point. Um, so the case is moving forward. The hearing on, um, March 9th,

which is why not, you know, I'll be in another lens. That hearing, there's a hearing from like 11 to

four. And then there's a press conference at like 5 p.m. You know, another lens time. And but that

hearing is like basically their version of interlocatory appeal. What happened was the trial court

was not allowing witnesses and not allowing the independent media and, um, the public into the court

and the only people who are covering this are the independent media. Uh, so, uh, what happened was

is the, that's what the appeal is about. And but now on the positive note, the, uh, uh,

the appellate court is allowing the witnesses to be present. I'll be one of them. Uh, and also

allowing the independent media and the public into the courtroom. In fact, I think when I read the

thing, they sent out like they're actually getting the largest room for that purpose. So I mean,

that's a, if they're, if you want to read the tea leaves, that's a positive sign from the appellate court.

Um, now, I don't believe we will be testifying. I'm a witness. Um, Catherine Austin fits his

witness. Sasha Latapova's a witness. Um, Dr. Michael Yeating and Catherine Watt, um, as,

you know, as well as myself. Now my, my, um, I don't believe we'll be testifying at this hearing.

And might ask us a few questions, but I don't think we'll actually be testifying and being across

examine. Now, uh, my testimony, um, from what I understand is, is largely going to be to what

Dr. Boyle's legal view was, um, because he did give me an affidavit in my case. Um, he was very,

you know, I, when I filed my case, the second case where I filed in December 1st, the 2024 year in Florida,

he thought it was good. You know, he sent me an email saying it was a very fine piece of legal work

and he was glad to be part of it. So, um, now Dr. Boyle's legal views, he had four main arguments.

There are multiple arguments, including getting into the patents and all that kind of stuff about

why these, um, MRI injections or bioweapons or COVID injections or bioweapons. But Dr. Boyle had four

main arguments. Um, the first was that COVID was developed through legal gain of function research.

Um, and he cite the paper from 2015 that encrim, that incriminates Fauci, Wollensky, and, and all

those folks. Um, I forget the exact name of it. It was, but it was like back coronavirus,

something or other. And, um, this paper incriminates, um, these people for doing the legal gain of

function research, because there's a more torment at the time. And Dr. Boyle's argument is that it

wasn't for peaceful purposes, because it was like strengthening the virus on power phrasing here.

And so, um, and again, this, it's not just an expert legal opinion. This is speaking to legislative

intent, because he lobbied for and drafted the biological weapons and anti-terrorism act in 1989,

which is the US domestic immolation of the, uh, legislation of the biological weapons convention.

So this speaks to legislative intent. So, and so that, so he's saying, basically, the COVID virus

was produced through illegal gain of function research, making it a bioweapon. And the derivatives

of that are in the, quote, unquote, vaccine, which makes that a bioweapon. Um, you know, real quick,

I want to just ask you something about that, because I think a central point in Dr. Boyle's

analysis was really about the fact that the spike protein, uh, was engineered and modified,

or modified, you know, really to render these injections prohibited under the biological

weapons convention, uh, and it's, you know, implementing laws. Isn't that the derivative?

That's a derivative of the, quote, unquote, virus that was illegally created.

And so in the damaging, it's not just a, it's not just a piece of a virus that, that, uh, is,

um, you know, and it's actually something that causes it's like creating your, it's entering

yourselves and making it like a spike factory for lack of a better word. Yeah. Um, what I mean,

so that's, that's one of his core arguments. Basically, the, the, the virus was an illegal

gain of function bioweapon to derivatives of that, including the spike protein, you know,

the SV40 promoter, promoter, what else? But the derivatives of that were in the injections,

that that makes them as bioweapons as well. And the beauty of that argument, in my view, is

it's so simple, it shows specific intent. Mm-hmm. Okay. Now, the other argument that he makes is that

the, the libid nanoparticles were developed through DARPA. They're a deluge technology,

they're developed in a military, you know, designed to get into your cells and so on. He, any

argues that that shows specific intent as well. And these are, he included a transcript of an

interview he did on a podcast with his affidavit that was used in my case. And so he kind of gets

into this little bit in that interview. And, um, so that's two arguments there. He did support

the quote-unquote knowingness, standard of intent, which I kind of use in my case,

on the why it used to gain a functionary. But I basically, in my case, showed that the shots are

harmful, you know, they're causing disease, killing people and so on. And also not only did

it not affective, there's a negative effectiveness, yet at the same time, you're saying these are

safe and effective. Like, so at a very minimum, according to the Pfizer versus cancer case,

December of 2020, um, you know, the typical deep state bureaucrats knew these shots were harmful,

you know, they kept lying about it. Now, I think it was premeditated and so on, but just going by

that. Um, so that's the knowingness, standard of intent. You know, it was harm people

you're lying about it. Uh, and then the other, the other argument that he, the third one that he

makes is called malice of forethought, which is like a, a reckless disregard for human life.

And he argues the net's like home from common law. And he argues that based on that alone,

you could prosecute, you can indict and prosecute Fauci burlone, the other heads in the pharmaceutical

companies, um, from malice of forethought. And then, of course, he brings up the Nuremberg code,

which, you know, even if the Nuremberg code itself isn't binding about informed consent,

that everything, um, every, every country has their own, um, version of informed consent laws and

and the Netherlands, uh, as well have those. Um, but, um, my understanding, I don't have the exact

law in front of me, but actually Dr. Remaloeba, label was telling me this the other day that the,

the, um, the Nuremberg code was actually based on the US federal law on informed consent,

which is still in effect, which actually can carry as far as capital punishment. But, um, so,

so basically those were the four main core arguments, um, you know, specific intent with the gain

of function, um, the knowingness standard, malice of forethought, and then, of course, the lack of

informed consent, because this is like an ongoing experiment. And, um, and I, I, I think those are,

I think there's a solid argument. I think there are plenty of other arguments that can be made

about why these are a weapon, but those were his, and now he might have supported other arguments,

but those are his basic arguments that I can recall at the moment.

Does that make sense? Yeah, and I think that's important. Um, the, the informed consent argument,

I think is a very valid one, uh, especially, uh, I know this to be the case like for the military,

right? Uh, this, this was a huge problem. And the fact that they did not have informed consent,

that they were forced, uh, to take an experimental vaccine. And even the vaccine that, that, in,

in the case there, um, you know, it was not even one that had even been looked at by the FDA. It was

a lot of people, a lot of people, Nate were just coerced, uh, even have some military,

like even here in Florida, they're like the reason these big law firms that do these civil cases,

let the slip and fall stuff and the accent stuff, the reason they're not taking on these cases.

I mean, I think there's a lot of reasons, but one of them is they coerced their employees to get

the shots without a doubt. Yeah. And I literally helped, I literally helped people working in those

law firms, given them information so they can push back not to get those shots. And I'm not an

attorney, but I was giving them info. Um, but, um, so, yeah, so to your point, the informed consent,

for sure. You know, here's an important thing for people to remember, you know, you hear a lot of

people bring up about emergency use authorization and all that, but even under the EUA, um, it falls

under 21 USC, uh, 360. And what it states in there is that recipients must be informed to the extent

practicable of the EUA status, known potential benefits and risks, uh, including unknowns,

and they need the option to accept a refuse. When the government says, if you are a federal employee

and you don't get this experimental shot that is not FDA approved, that is, uh, you know, an EUA,

or you're going to get fired, that is coercion. When the government says contractors have to make

sure that they enforce, you know, the, the, uh, this experimental vaccine to be injected into,

and I guarantee you, not a single person was told about the potential harms of these, uh,

you know, vaccines. And the fact is, as they were not offered the option to refuse,

they were coerced. And that's the bottom line. Right. So yeah, if they weren't forced,

they were certainly coerced socially or, you know, threats of economic harm. But, you know,

here's the thing, too, is even under the EUA is, I don't believe that covers the use of bioweapons.

And again, Dr. Bull's expert opinion is not just an illegal opinion. It speaks to the legislative

intent. He wrote the law. And so, uh, and, and quite frankly, if it did, then, you know, what,

if a law is, you know, uh, contrary to the constitution, it's null and void, like Marvelous Madison,

you know, we have a constitution. I don't believe our constitution allows the government or any

entity to target us with bioweapons. And so you'd have to have informed consent would be like

bioweapon user your own risk, you know. So, um, so that's what this Netherlands hearing is about

on the ninth. It's about whether the witnesses will be allowed in. Um, and, um, you know,

cameras and independent media and the public at large, and which they should be. This is impacting

every person on the planet, let alone the Netherlands. And so it should have the light of day.

I don't know if they're allowed to have other witnesses, honestly, because I could all,

pretty much all the witnesses, in my case, were probably witnesses in this case. If they needed,

like medical more medical doctors and stuff, um, because I have medical doctors and scientists

that are giving me half a day of it, saying it's a bioweapon. But, um, so I'll have to ask them

when we're from there. One of the things I think is important, the folks that are listening,

it's understanding why it's important. This, this classification of, of a biological weapon

is that the law is very clear and it's got teeth. You're talking about 10 years prison sentence

for this kind of stuff. And, and, uh, you know, that is, I think, you know, we need something.

We need there to be accountability. We cannot ever have this happen again in the United States.

No, no, absolutely not because they'll do it again if we don't find a way to have any type. Here's

a few more. Also, I want to say, there's also, and I forget the, the, the number, but the, the,

actually our, our federal weapons of mass destruction law is actually even stronger. And it would fall

under that as well. Um, and every state has their own version of a weapons of mass destruction

or biological weapons law or terrorism law that this would fall under. Because I have my bill,

and I've got that introduction, like three states, Arizona, Arizona and Tennessee, um, it's still

alive in Tennessee. So we'll see if we can get that to move forward. Um, but, um, and that's just

saying these are, that's just acknowledging that these are already illegal and creating a civil

and criminal penalty for non-enforcement. Um, just, I guess I can briefly update my case,

because we're probably moving along on a timeline, right? Um, so, uh, my case here in Florida,

I've been suing, it's my second case, uh, I'm suing, uh, I'm arguing that I was injured via

involuntary environmental exposure through shedding, um, my triple bypass, my congestive heart,

failure and triple bypass heart surgery resulted at. So, uh, long story short, um, my case was

dismissed in December of 2024. Um, and it wasn't dismissed with prejudice, but the court basically

threatened me with sanctions and said it wanted to take any further motions. Went through the appellate

process. I had like 80 issues. I was appealing on one of those was that the court did not allow me to

amend my complaint because of what they just did there. So the, I actually wanted my appeal. At first,

I thought I lost because they dismissed my case, but they could not reverse and remand it because the

trial court did not dismiss it with prejudice, meaning you can't amend it, but unofficially it did.

So what they did is they dismissed my case and said it was still active in a lower court,

and I can amend it. And that's despite what the judge said. So then I, I amend my complaint made

it shorter. She dismissed it again. I did my most of her rehearing and she dismissed again. So we're

back in the appellate court. Um, what I did too is I shifted from I'm still saying it's a

biological and technological weapon of mass destruction. What I'm using though is Florida's health

freedom law. And I'm arguing that the involuntary environmental exposure is in fact,

coerced vaccination and our health freedom law prohibits any forced or coerced EUA products,

face masks, the shots or anything. And so I'm using that law. And I mean, I'm also making a

constitutional argument as well about your right to life and you know, body autonomy and privacy

and so on. But um, so like I said, I wanted appeal. I got dismissed again and I'm back in the court

and the governor attorney general got to March 30th to do their answer brief. So we'll see what

happens. But right now, governor DeSantis is fighting to keep shots on the market.

Wow. I'm surprised honestly that these shots have not been taken off the market, especially

with, you know, the evidence that has come out as to the damage that they do. It just blows my

mind that these things can still be out there. But anyways, we're just about out of time. But I

want to thank you for coming on and sharing this and updating us on this. Where can people follow

your work? My website, JosephSansone.com. That's my subs deck. Awesome. Well, folks, we're going to

pause right here for a brief break. When we return, we're going to shift our focus to international

security matters. Joining us will be Jack Donna to unpack the latest developments in the joint

US Israel military operation in Iran, including recent strikes, reported casualties and the strategic

ramifications amid escalating regional tensions. Stay with us more ahead after this short break.

Virus protection and immune boosting just got easier. Enter the daily V stack using cellular

absorption technology. We put vitamins A, C, D, zinc and quirceton together with a multi-mineral

complex for complete protection. The daily V stack is basically an oral IV of six products all in

one at an affordable price. Go to chemicalfreebody.com, forward slash out loud, get the daily V stack,

protect yourself, boost your immune system and save 20% on your first order.

Have you been looking for a healthy snack for on the go? Well, not all energy bars are soft and

sugary. Bear bars. Sir, a crunchy, savory bar made from just six simple natural ingredients.

Bear bars are plant-based. Organic gluten-free contains six grams of protein and are low

temperature dried for a unique crunch. Most energy bars are based on chocolate or fruit and are

held together with serps or sweeteners. To learn more, just visit bearbar.com slash out loud.

Well, it's high time Americans refuse to be pawns in the human chest. Under the name of diversity,

politicians divide the people in their quest for power. No diversity opinion and expression

is as American as apple pie. Now is our time with my fellow Americans in America out loud

dot news, liberty and justice for all. Welcome back to Unleash the Political News Hour. We

appreciate your continued attention as we move into our third and final segment. We now turn

to one of the most significant and rapidly evolving international security developments of our time.

The ongoing joint US Israel military operation against the Iranian regime. This coordinated

campaign design designated operation epic fury by the United States and Operation Rory Lyon

by Israel commenced on February 28, 2026. It has targeted Iranian nuclear facilities, missile

production sites, military infrastructure, naval assets and senior leadership, including

the confirmed elimination of Supreme Leader Ayatolli Ali Kalmani. The operation follows exhaustive

diplomatic efforts that ultimately failed to secure Iran's dismantlement of its nuclear program

and related threats. A recent reports indicate that the campaign has involved hundreds of strikes

in its initial phases with US and Israeli forces achieving substantial degradation of Iranian

air defenses, retaliatory capabilities and command structures. Casualties include three US

service members as of the time of this recording killed and several wounded alongside Iranian

retaliatory missile and drone attacks directed at Israel and US interests in the region.

We're going to get into that a little bit. And also President Trump has described the operation as

proceeding ahead of schedule while both US and Israeli leadership have emphasized that the

objective is to eliminate existential threats and create conditions for the Iranian people

to determine their future governance. I'm pleased to welcome back our regular guest and security

affairs analyst, Jack Dona, who joins us to provide a detailed breakdown of these events. Jack,

thank you for joining the show. I'm really looking forward to your strategic rationale and kind

of understanding of how these things and these operations progress. Well, thank you for having me

Nate. It's always honor to be on your show and I appreciate you reaching out to me. Yeah,

this is just as an incredible operation from an intelligent standpoint, which is primarily

my background. It's readily apparent by the actions that both the Israeli defense forces

have done and the United States forces have done that they've been preparing for this for

quite some time. You don't just pull this audio back pocket and throw it up there and hope it

sticks. I mean, it's obvious that in all likelihood that Mossad probably had human assets on the ground,

tracking the Ayatollah and also the top level leadership. So in the intelligence world,

as you will know Nate, what they probably put together, what's called a pattern of life.

And able to track and predict his whereabouts and so it is in all likelihood that they

knew based upon that pattern of life that once negotiations completely broke down, they likely knew

and had assets human and probably common assets on the ground that he was going to call a meeting

which he did. And so he was eliminated. His minister of defense was eliminated. The minister of

intelligence and a few others were going to have the compound that they were having their median

collapse on top of them. So it's a real, it's a really, for lack of a better word, it's truly

is a tribute to the intelligence services, both ours and Israelis, how they pulled us off.

Yeah, you know, for them to be able to not only take out Khomeini, but to also take out

40 leadership folks around him, striking the complex at just the right time when they're all

together. There's no doubt in my mind they had to have had some human intelligence on the ground.

You're not going to get that just from, you know, digital surveillance and that sort of thing.

The, and I think the, I think the Israelis have probably been embedded for some time,

you know, with human sources because, and this is the challenge, right? This is the challenge

of all dictators is that there are, you know, we're already seeing it. There are plenty of people

within, you know, the country of citizens within the country of Iran that want this dictatorship gone.

They see them as, you know, as, as basically usurpers rightfully so.

Coming in to destroy, you know, their, their liberties and their freedom and now, you know,

I think even some who may have just kind of gone along to get along have seen the damage that

has been done to the economy and to, you know, their freedoms and everything else and to their

reputation around the world. So the likelihood of their being moles within the Iranian revolutionary

guard is probably pretty high. Oh, absolutely. You know, and, you know, we were commenting about that

in the, in the Think Tank last night that basically, you know, you know, and even Trump later,

late last night sent out a thing saying that he's got several generals and civilian authorities

that are reaching out to him saying, you know, in exchange for amnesty, we'll, we'll, you know, we'll,

you know, we'll, basically turn over the regime based, you know, and so that's, that is a very,

very significant thing and it speaks to your point about, you know, likely Mossad had infiltrated

and that's how they were able to, you know, track the IOTO and his top level leadership. So look,

you know, so, you know, when these guys have meetings and stuff, they're actually, they're,

they're going to let their second in command or they're, you know, their exos or whatever,

they're going to tell them say, hey, I got a meeting, I'm going to be off the net because they're

not going to bring communications in there because they don't trust their own communications because

as you know, if it's, if it's broadcast electronically, the NSA will intercept it. So, you know,

obviously, you know, you can't use couriers or you could probably use couriers to have the

meeting itself, but the couriers themselves could be compromised, you know. So, you know, it was,

it was a, it was a really a great operation and, you know, they, you know, what I was really,

what, what I really jumped, you know, when I heard this was, they took out, they took out Mahmoud

Ahmadini job and that was, that was, I was like, yes, because that guy was, you know, rumored and

there was a few of the 53 hostages from 1979 that swore up and down and he was one of their,

one of their, the people that imprisoned him, he was one of those revolutionaries that took

the prisoners. So, that was also, that was also great news. So, where do things go from here?

I mean, you know, it's, it's, I don't believe that, and all indications are that the command and

control has been, has been shattered because you're not seeing the response from the Iranian

military that you would see if they were under, you know, still under direct military control,

it's sporadic. I think a lot of these commanders are operating on autopilot, you know, with, you

know, standing orders that they had and so, you know, we had reports that the Straits of Hormuz

have been shut down by Iran and, you know, one of the members of the think tank who's, you know,

was a captain in the Navy, he said, he doubts that, he says that basically what he believes in,

and it, it, it could very well be possible that the, the US Navy shut down the Straits of Hormuz

as a way to keep China in line as in, don't even think about making move on Taiwan,

or we're really going to choke off the energy supply, you know, and so I think, I think that, you

know, when you take, when you take that aspect into play, you take the Venezuela aspect into play,

you know, United States is in control of a lot of energy now. When I heard that talks had finally

broken down, you know, knowing Trump and knowing his track record, he more than likely went to the

Second War and to raise and cane and said, look, if we're going to do this thing, we're going to go

all in and we're going to just, you know, you know, drop multiple hammers, I don't want no half

stepping, I don't want no, I don't, I don't want any, uh, Daisy, Daisy carriers, I, you know,

I don't want any Daisy carrier generals, I want, I want meat eaters. And so that's what we're seeing

here. And, um, that's, that's a good thing. Uh, you know, to, to your point earlier about people

being naysayers and, you know, uh, you can count me in that group, you know, I mean, I spent, I

spent quite a, quite a bit of time in the Middle East in Iraq and Afghanistan. And it's not a pleasant

place in, you know, the, I think the litmus test would be, you know, if I had a son, you know,

and he, and he was in uniform, you know, would I, would I want him to go and the answer would be

unequivocally, no, absolutely not. But, you know, once, once the order is given, uh, you know,

it is our duty as patriotic Americans to say, okay, we're committed. Let's get it done,

let's get it done fiercely. Let's, no, no, no, none of this Vietnamization dragging things out,

you know, year after year, get it done, pray for our troops, pray for the president, pray for

the Second War, you know, and, uh, and, and that's, that's our duty as, as, as Americans, as

patriots. We're, we're supposed to do that. And I think a lot of the people that are, that are,

you know, you know, playing the, uh, uh, you know, taxi driver right now and, and throwing shade,

uh, you know, you know, for clickbait or for whatever reasons, you know, I, I, myself personally,

I think that is, that is wrong. We shouldn't be doing that. But, uh, in regards to, you bring up a

good point. Look, if folks, yeah, regardless of where somebody stood before, uh, this action,

you would be a fool if you felt like, you know, like when, when you see the, the, the,

the people are trying to work against Trump, uh, regardless of what somebody's position was before,

uh, this operation was launched. The fact is, is we're in it now and we better be in it to win it.

And we're, we're, we gain nothing by, you know, half measures. If we're going to do this,

we need to do it and we need to complete the job. And it needs to be done, uh, you know, really

honestly, it needs to be completed before, uh, the end of Trump's administration, because, uh,

this cannot turn into another, you know, Afghanistan. And I don't think it will. I think we have a

very, very different circumstance, uh, you know, in, in this situation. Any type of conflicts is,

is very nuanced. And, you know, what we're looking at here is we're looking at the removal of

Islamist extremists at the helm of, you know, a, a, a military that is working on nuclear weapons.

We cannot, unequivocally, we cannot allow that to happen. Uh, I think we're seeing the world

other than Russia and China. We are seeing the rest of the world that agrees with that.

And, uh, I don't know if you saw the UN emergency meeting that was held and the different

comments. I mean, it's kind of a, you know, it's kind of a vacuous thing, right? You hear these

guys talking about and saying, you know, what their opinion is and half of these countries have

no involvement whatsoever. It, you know, very rarely do they even have their own militaries.

But it was laughable to hear Russia, uh, get up there and, and try to, um, you know, speak about, uh,

you know, American imperialism and, you know, when, when they invaded a, a nation, uh,

you know, an independent nation and tried to take it over. I mean, it's like, are you kidding me?

Do you guys, yourself? Yeah, it's, it's a problem. It's, you know, it's, that's all it is. It's just

a problem. It's, it's not signal. It's noise, you know, and it's just noise and signal noise.

You know, I wanted to make a comment. I wanted to make a comment. You know, I had a, I had a,

about, about your point about, you know, the sleeper cells here, uh, you know, do I believe

they're here? Yeah. But see, you know, this, there's, there's another factor to hear that I was

talking with a, uh, uh, this morning for my analyst that I knew, uh, Intel analyst 100 first.

He kind of looked at me and he says, you know what, Jack, these sleeper cells may not even activate.

I mean, these, the money got just probably just got cut off to them with, with, you know,

the Ayatollah being whacked and they may be looking around and going, you know, hey, you know,

actually things aren't so bad here. I mean, well, I'm not, I'm not going to go blow myself up and,

you know, I got a family now and stuff. You know, you know what I mean? So we may, we may not see

a lot of these actors, these sleeper cells even go active. I mean, you know, these guys may get,

get, will probably like to get picked up down the road eventually. You know, I mean, you know,

that, you know, this, uh, you know, immigration will eventually catch up with them. But, you know,

as far as, you know, them going hot, we might, we might, we might not see that. Yeah.

Well, I think it's clear. One of the things that seems obvious to me is that the reach of

Iran does seem to have been pretty much contained within the Middle East. I mean, we're seeing that

already with a lot of the, I mean, there's been some obviously, there's been some, some work with

them, you know, in the cartels and who knows? Maybe that has something to do with why the US was

involved in, you know, helping Mexico take out the, uh, halisco, uh, the other day because there

has been some work between, uh, Iranians and, uh, you know, the, the regime and some of these drug

cartels. But reality is, is that I think we do have pretty good intelligence on the ground. And

I think we have seen, um, you know, some cooperation that has happened. I think we're making a very,

you know, and one thing that we know, you know, this, I know this, the Middle East has zero respect

for nations that don't project power. But they have. Absolutely. For pops. Yeah. Absolutely. They,

that is, that is 100% correct. I mean, if, if you do not project power and you do not project

authority and, uh, and, and, and carry yourself with an era of dominance, they immediately view

this as weakness immediately, you know, I mean, and, you know, you got guys like Starmer and Britain

and you got Macron and France, you know, under their decline is they got no choice but to do that.

Yeah. Look at those that can't see. I'm rolling my eyes right now. I mean, look at,

man, what a bunch of weenies. Yeah, they are. But I mean, they have no choice. Look at what they

imported into their country. They have no choice but to go up there and all we condemn this. Just,

I mean, look at what they've imported into their country. But, you know, they, they, they, they,

they are, they've, they've imported kidnappers and they're being held politically, they're being

held politically hostage by the people, the very people that, uh, you know, they imported. So,

Starmer just makes me want to puke. I watched him, you know, get up there and give this speech

about how I want to make clear that Britain had nothing to do with this attack on the Iran.

But we've got planes in the air to protect our kids shut up, man. I mean, what a weenie. Like,

like you, you talk about like projecting weakness. Yeah. That guy is the epitome of his disgusting.

Oh, yeah. Absolutely. I agree with you. You know, I'm, uh, nothing to do with this. Oh my gosh.

Yeah. Another, another, another thing too is another key point here, you know, kind of the

dovetail, what, what you were saying, you know, as far as, uh, you know, these dictators now,

you know, they don't notice, you know, I mean, look at the, they took out a committee and then

his second and command, well, he, he wasn't even on the job for a few hours. I just got some news

reports that they just took out, um, the, the successor to Ayatollah committee. So it's kind of like

a conel enemy. It's like, who wants to sign up for that job? Right. You know, you got a point there

and of course, because the thing is is you, of course, the, the Ayatollah himself, right? This guy

is a religious fanatic, but you got to imagine that a lot of these people really are in these

positions of power and they're probably many of them don't drink the Kool-Aid that's being served

to them. They're just basically going along to get along and to, you know, stay in power. I think

it was a very smart move for Trump to say what he did about, you know, basically saying, hey, look,

you got an option. You either put down your weapons and you, you know, you, uh, basically

were signed from a trying to fight in this or we're going to kill you. I mean, and that's basically

what he said. And the thing about it is it's not a hollow threat. I mean, you know, this is going

to have a ripple effect, uh, you know, because, because now he's got his, now he's got his, his grip,

not his finger. He's got his grip on, I think somewhere in the area of around 30 to 40% of the

world's oil, oil, oil supply. And, you know, with, with the capture of, with the taking event as

well. And I was reading reports the last night that basically Cuba now is in negotiations with

the administration to, to, you know, to basically give up, give up, uh, you know, the whole dictatorship.

And so, you know, Nicaragua will have to follow also because, you know, they, they got nothing.

I mean, it's a largely an agrarian type society there, but it's ruled by a dictator and they

depend on, they were depending on that as well for a lot of their energy. So, you know, I'm glad you

brought that up. I was actually that this is all his, this was something I was talking about the

other day was, um, without a doubt, Cuba's got to be looking at all this going on. Uh, you know,

with Bayla, uh, you know, and not just, you know, Cuba, but I mean, like, look at what happened in

Colombia, right? Uh, you, you had Colombia come out and condemn the United States for, you know,

taking Maduro. And no sooner did one of these Cuban, you know, uh, protection squads, uh, you

know, members talk about, you know, what, uh, what, what they had experienced with the US military

coming in there. They said it was like aliens, you know, landing that they, they were so technologically

advanced that they had no chance in that they were vomiting blood and they had blood coming out

their eyes and their nose to do some sort of, you know, uh, uh, sonic weapon and the funny thing is

is like, it was not even an hour later that the, the Colombian president was calling Trump and like

making nice with them. And, you know, it's like, oh, you know, we want to cooperate with you.

This is important, folks. It's extremely important because these, these countries that are in our

own backyard, they really, uh, they, they are not, they have not just been doing, you know, bad things

in our backyard, but they have been, you know, essentially cooperating with Russia, cooperating

with China, uh, to set things up, I think for our demise. And I think all of that has been reset.

The hope and prayer that I have is that we finished the job in Iran quickly and that the Iranian

people rise to the occasion and, uh, and I think it's clear that, you know, Trump wants regime

change, but he wants it done by the people, not by us. And I think, and I think that's a good thing.

I think that the sign that we need to look for, I mean, and I think you'll agree with me on this,

you know, basically, especially you based upon your background. I think when we start to see

political prisoners being free in Iran, that's it. The jig is up. Once you start seeing these

prisons get opened up and all of these people that have, that have been, you know, tortured and

have been basically kidnapped by the gun when you start to see those people being released,

that's when I think the jig is up for, uh, for, I mean, it's over at that point. I'll tell you my,

what I hope and what I see that that gives me hope is the, just the amount of, you know,

the few videos that have been smuggled out of, um, Iran are showing people, you know,

praising Trump, praising the Israelis, you know, expressing their love for Israel, expressing their love for

America, um, for Donald Trump. I think if Iran becomes free and that is the sentiment that happens

with the Iranian people, it will, it will be infectious and it will begin to, to shift and change

the hearts and minds of, of other citizens within these countries that are in the Middle East.

We're already beginning to see a little bit of it, um, but there's still some, you know,

there's still some anti-Semitic, you know, uh, you know, opinions or at least public, uh, you know,

public sentiment, if you will, that's made by these governments. But I'll tell you the, the,

Iatola, uh, you know, the, the, uh, Iranian Revolutionary Guard striking all of these, uh,

you know, all of these Muslim countries that are their neighbors, their cousins,

but that has done nothing, uh, but to, I think, solidify, uh, the opinions of most of these

countries that are our allies that, uh, that it's a good thing we're taking them out. And I think

that was, that's actually a very important thing. Well, we're just about out of time, but I want

to thank you, you know, for coming on the show. I think these issues are very, uh, important for

us to be talking about. I think that, uh, there's a lot of drivel that is, you know, going to be put

out there, you know, in the media. Yeah. And, and there are all, obviously, going to be opinions

that differ. But like you had mentioned, that those things don't do any good for us right now.

We need to finish a job and we need to finish strong. Well, yeah, you're right, you know, and,

and, you know, to the listening audience out there and any new listeners, you know, uh, I,

I highly recommend you, you, you follow and, and, and listen and, and track Nate Kane and,

and all of his, all of his product because, uh, you're not going to get any of the salacious,

you know, garbage, you know, it's, you know, you know, to your credit, uh, Nate, you always put

out signal. And, uh, I always enjoy being on your show. It's, it's a, it's a real honor.

I, you know, it's just refreshing to have someone like you that's, that has the background.

And can speak to speak and not, you know, speak garbage, you know, it's, it's, it's, it's great

to be on your show. Well, I appreciate you and your engagement and time on this issue.

And folks, those that are listening, we appreciate you listening to, uh, you know, to this show.

And, uh, you know, we're, we're grateful that we have a listening audience that engages.

And that wants to know what's really going on in the world.

These issues, uh, that we've covered, uh, this edition on accountability and public health,

individual rights and, and global security, they remain central to our national discourse.

Please join us next time as we continue to explore the facts and implications shaping our world.

This is Nate Kane signing off, stand formed, stand gauged, and we will see you soon. Good day.