Jack Hearts On the Porch Episode 59: Seeing is believing or is believing seeing?

Phil’s show notes

* Scientific data and conclusions are influenced by the observer, regardless of the devices used for measurement – Double slit

* The 5 w’s of me

* Who – the conscious observer

* What – a consciousness that is being

* Where – in quantum soup

* When – in the moment

* Why – for sensory experience, growth

* Conscious observation is influenced by experience, sensory limitations, ad propaganda.

* A theoretical philosophical hypothesis is never truly proven – only agreed upon at the time by multiple observers.

* All of the above is based upon the BELIEF of the observer; belief in the data, belief in the measurements, the philosophic underpinning of the observer’s society. – all influencing the outcomes.

* The conclusion of a hypothesis is not a law nor a fact but an opinion of the observer. The conclusion is based on analysis of the observed and recorded data at the time experiment was conducted and by the comparative and contrasting data available.

* There is no time like the present – where are the bones, why so much mud, archaeological finds out of place etc.

* Double Slit

* Video Game Analogy

* Manipulation of the game or the effect of conscious observation upon that being observed

* Validation from science 1994

* Maintaining the matrix scientific discoveries in genomic structures

* Epigenetics and communication between genetic code snippets across species – Biophoton emission is the spontaneous emission of ultraweak light emanating from all living systems, including man.

* How belief in the unseen and immeasurable create solid matter

* How the matrix is held together for observation

* Manipulation of belief to change the interpretation of the observation

Many are the readers and listeners of Jack’s work who already have a belief in the simulated reality in which we are experiencing. Today we discuss how the scientific method is applied to this and some findings.

The background of this concept in the modern era (the last couple of generations) has to do with quantum physics theories and the mathematical computations borne out by experimentation electronically and mechanically using recent technology. Of these recent findings one stood out to me. And it isn’t from the world of physics but that of medicine. Look up biophotons and microDNA role in epigenetics.

I’ll start with this one thing, everyone has the ability to research the double slit experiment. This is where a photon is either a particle or a wave depending on whether it is being observed by a “human being’s consciousness”. I put it in this way for a particular reason. The reason being that we don’t know if the photon interacts with dogs, cats or AI in the same way. So, depending on the focus of the participating viewer the state of the photon changes from wave (not seen potential energy) to a particle (seen radiated energy). For the remainder of this article, I will use the word see to mean consciousness receiving input. Whether that input be from the 5 classical senses or measured but ignored by conscious translation.

Moving on, there has been the question in the quantum world about the existence of reality if it is not being observed. Lets dig in to this a little. When I am focused on my keyboard and my attempt to communicate thoughts does the road that goes by exist, or is it only there when I am putting my focus upon it? I know it is on a map, I travel it often, but when my consciousness is not experiencing or thinking about it is it part of my reality? And if I say yes, it exists outside of me always, is that reality or a belief in something unseen until I see it again?

Belief is a huge factor in maintaining the conscious connection to reality. I define belief loosely as the solidity or stability of something not seen to endure until seen. Often, in the case of an individual’s belief in Gods ie: Yahweh, Jesus, Mohammed, or a pantheon the “God” is never seen in a true photonic particle physical form. So belief comes down to inculcating in the external unseen teaching/propaganda input and using that input to create an imaginary world. That propaganda input is used by other consciousnesses to gain some form of manipulation over your view of the reality of the matrix. Does that unseen imaginary world become your reality?

Consider again the double slit experiment. If you put your focus upon the photon it becomes physically measurable. So if your belief in something you consciously view which is not measurable in reality but nonetheless exists in consciousness, either originally imagined by you or something you were given to believe in, and you wish to create that which is not already in your (measurable) reality can that thing you wish to create become a part of your reality? An inventor does this every day, think of something which is not in the world, see it from all sides in their mind’s eye, then make become measurable through his physical efforts. How does this relate to the Quantum matrix simulation?

https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/genetic-dark-matter-and-return-goddess

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7795982_An_Introduction_to_Human_Biophoton_Emission

A scientist discovered how to manipulate reality. 12 hours later, he vanished...

https://www.physics-astronomy.com/4-cases-when-things-travel-faster-than-the-speed-of-light/ – spooky actions at a distance.

My Big TOE – My Big Theory of Everything

Excerpt: Chaioth ha-Qadosh – Tookie Memorial Post, Sīrius Calling II By Jack Heart & Orage – The Human: Jack Heart, Orage and Friends

Thomas Hobbes, a scion of the British Empire and the father of Transhumanism, even penned its bible taking his cues from the Zohar and naming it what he thought the most evil title he could give it; Leviathan. In this maleficent monument to tautological dialectics; Hobbs, using rationalism which was the science of his day, makes the case that man is no more than a biological machine, an epicurean thing, which is merely a product of its own environment and the property of the state.

Depravedly insane as Hobbes was he was not stupid. He knew just what he was doing; the title is a dead giveaway. He had hated the clergy since he was a boy and they forced his father out of London leaving his aristocratic family without a patriarch. He had intended to write the bible for atheism right from the start. He would have been exposed to what was in the Zohar through the teachings of John Dee and Sir Edward Kelley which had infected the fledgling empires aristocracy in the sixteenth century.

Leviathan although begun earlier was completed in the middle of the seventeenth by the chronically ailing Hobbes. He would live another thirty years till the ripe old age of ninety-one and seems to have been in the habit of using health issues to stay out of the wars he was always around.

The academic sycophants of Hobbes would define his book as the foundation of “Materialism,” philosophy’s flavor of the day since the “Enlightenment…” Transhumanism is the logical conclusion of Materialism just like death is the logical conclusion to a malignant tumor.

Hobbes, academia become death, was initially ineffectually challenged by Anglican Bishop John Bramhall who did what he could against Hobbes and his supporting chorus of academic chimpanzees. It would be a half century before this Typhoid Mary of Transhumanism was effectively challenged by an Irish aristocrat and Christian shaman who understood the importance of vigorous good health in formulating ones perception of the world. George Berkeley, the Bishop of Cloyne in Ireland, ironically or maybe not, is the man to which the University of California, Berkeley is named after.

To keep fit enough to intellectually smack down the apostles of Materialism, as he was seemingly born to do, Berkeley drank what he called tar water or “distilled acid of tar (turpentine)” by the gallons.

In America’s back woods, where they handle venomous snakes as part of the Christian religion, they still use it as a cure for snake bite. Berkeley “learned about this cure from the American Narragansett Indians. You mixed tar with water then after a few days, you skim off the clear liquid and drink several cups per day.” (64)

Berkeley hailed tar water as a panacea for virtually all that ails a human being:“A cure for foulness of blood, ulceration of bowels, lungs, consumptive coughs, pleurisy peripheumony, erysipelas, asthma, indigestion, cachectic and hysteric cases [insanity], gravel, dropsy, and all inflammations.” (65)

Arthur Schopenhauer his intellectual heir who came a century later called Berkeley the father of Idealism but by the dawning of the twenty-first century it would turn out he was even more than that, far more. If ever there was a Prophet who could transcend time it was George Berkeley.

The words of the prophet may have been written on the subway wall but long before that they were carved in the walls of hallowed academic halls by Berkeley. By 1979 there were over thirteen hundred scholarly works on him, one of the most powerful and influential universities in the West was named after him and another one, Yale, was built on his dime but until now nobody has really understood him.

At the dawn of the eighteenth century Berkeley served academia formal notice that God now had the floor with The Principles of Human Knowledge. Like the wrath of angels he descended upon Isaac Newton, Edmond Halley and John Locke.

He ridiculed the ‘laws of gravity’ and perhaps the Enlightenment itself by asking: “how are we enlightened by being told this is done by attraction?

Is it that this word signifies the kind of tendency, telling us that the event comes from bodies’ pulling one another, rather than from their being pushed towards each other? But that tells us nothing about how this ‘pulling’ is done. For all we know to the contrary, it could as well be called pushing as pulling.” (66)

Inexplicably, it wasn’t in any books yet, Berkeley had anticipated by almost a century the math of the Marquis de Laplace proving gravity is caused by displacement… Berkeley savaged Newton and Halley with his sarcastic wit and flawless logic, relentlessly mocking the verbosity and pretentious empiricism of John Locke and he was just getting started…

Berkeley was as good at math as he was at philosophy. Almost twenty-five years later he would write The Analyst; A DISCOURSE Addressed to an Infidel Mathematician… Some say the infidel was Halley others Newton himself but regardless the discourse, wherein Berkeley coined the phrase “ghosts of departed quantities,” demolished the very foundations of Calculus for over a century, until derivatives and integrals were redefined by German and French mathematicians using limits. The Analyst is hailed by British scholars in the field as “the most spectacular event of the century in the history of British mathematics.” (67)

Berkeley may have been the best of his day by far in mathematics but he was no mathematician. In the Principles he has little use for what he called “high flights and abstractions” and he looked “on all researches into numbers as mere earnest trivialities insofar as they aren’t practically useful in improving our lives.”

He dismisses as superficial contriving “thinkers who put on a show of having an uncommon subtlety and elevation of thought. It has put a price on the most trifling numerical theorems that are of no practical use and serve only to pass the time; and it has infected the minds of some people so much that they have dreamed of mighty mysteries involved in numbers, and tried to explain natural things by means of them.” (68)

Berkeley was no fan of literature either. He said: “Unless we take care to clear the first principles of knowledge from being burdened and deluded by words, we can reason from them forever without achieving anything…” (69) Indeed, when he writes in his first paragraph of the Principles that the “illiterate majority of people, who walk the high road of plain common sense and are governed by the dictates of nature”(70) are the ones most comfortable in their own skins he is setting the precedent for a utopian maxim that would be repeated and established by no less a philosopher than Friedrich Nietzsche in his magnum opus Thus Spake Zarathustra, over a century and half later.

Actually Berkeley is the Christian version of Nietzsche. The latter used Mjolnir the pagan Hammer of Thor to lay waste to all the dialectical pedantry which preceded him. Berkeley preferred the Christian cross, used like Tyrfing the pagan Sword of Destiny. He scoffs at all the students of Aristotle that came before him calling them “those great masters of abstraction” and with sarcastic glee points out “what great good they have brought to mankind…” (71)

To Berkeley the ‘primary qualities’ of established philosophy are Abstractions and the ‘secondary qualities’ Abstractions of Abstractions. You cannot take what you want and leave the rest. He points out that “the qualities of things never really exist in isolation from one another; rather, they are mixed and blended together, several in the same object.” (72)

Any attempts to artificially isolate them, name them and give them “determinate signification” results in Abstractions, each more phantasmagorical than the last. Berkeley articulates the indeterminate nature of realty almost two hundred years before Werner Heisenberg was born when he says “really no general name has a single precise and definite signification.”(73)

When Berkeley writes “shape and extension don’t resemble any fixed and determinate qualities existing in matter, because they appear differently to the same eye in different positions” (74) he predicts the Many Worlds of Hugh Everett III two hundred and fifty years before Everett would turn physics on its head with his ground breaking paper Wave Mechanics Without Probability.

All of Berkeley’s Ideas were predicated on the Holographic paradigm three hundred years before there was one. He is still derisively called the father of Immaterialism by the braying adherents of Morgan Freeman “science”, who think Karl Pribram is a new flavor from Hostess Twinkie and Stanford University and Menlo Park only consequential as the birthplace of Google…

Just like Pribram, the master neurosurgeon who discovered the Holonomic brain, and just like the deepest blackest sciences of Menlo Park at which Pribram worked, Berkeley knew that matter, corporal substance, only exists as Ideas in the mind. Almost three hundred years before Pribram ever touched a scalpel or Harold Puthoff and Russell Targ pierced the veil of Illusion at Menlo Park; Berkeley proved by simple logic that it is “impossible that any colour or extension or other perceptible quality should exist in an unthinking thing outside the mind, or indeed that there should be any such thing as an object outside the mind.” (75)

Somehow Berkeley knew, in spite of the deafening simian chatter of his day about Materialism, objects “are wholly contained within the mind, so whatever is in them must be perceived.” (76) He coined the aphorism “esse is percipi,” to be is to be perceived…

To Berkeley, all objects are Ideas and “all ideas are passive and inert.” (77) They are insentient therefore they cannot “exist in any substance other than those unextended, indivisible substances, spirits, which act and think and perceive them.” (78)

Spirits are the only thing that can have an existence independent of the mind. “A spirit is an active being. It is simple, in the sense that it doesn’t have parts. When thought of as something that perceives ideas, it is called ‘the understanding’, and when thought of as producing ideas or doing things with them, it is called ‘the will’.” (79)

He said that in Man “the ideas of sense are stronger, livelier, and clearer than those of the imagination; and they are also steady, orderly and coherent.” (80) These he called the Laws of Nature and through them we learn to maximize the pleasures of existence and minimize the pain; “that food nourishes, sleep refreshes, and fire warms us; that to sow in the spring is the way to get a harvest in the fall…” It is “only by observing the settled laws of nature” (81) that man learns to take the actions that will bring about the desired result. “This consistent, uniform working obviously displays the goodness and wisdom of the governing spirit whose will constitutes” those laws. (82)

“What the scientist ought to be doing is to detect and decipher those signs (this language, so to speak) instituted by the author of nature, not claiming to explain things in terms of corporeal causes—a claim that seems to have too much estranged the minds of men from that active principle, that supreme and wise spirit, ‘in whom we live, move, and have our being’.” (83)

It should be apparent by now that Berkeley was no natural Man. He knew there is a Supreme Spirit, an Overlord above all the others but he also knew there were others, independent of Man just like in the Yggdrasil and the Sepher Yetzirah, with various means and talents to project their Ideas upon the others. But he also knew that all of these beings in one way or another, inscrutable even to him, serve the purpose of their Overlord.

“I see no reason to deny that there is a great variety of spirits, of different orders and capacities, whose abilities are far greater and more numerous than those the author of my being has bestowed on me. And for me to claim, on the basis of my own few, niggardly, narrow inlets of perception, what ideas the inexhaustible power of the supreme spirit may imprint on them would certainly be the utmost folly and presumption…” (84)

Little more than half way through the Principles, Berkeley knew he had accomplished just what he had set out to do with his landmark work. He had buried Hobbes, whose followers he calls “Hobbists,” and all the effeminate sentiments first postulated by an Epicurus of unknown origins that made Thomas Hobbes and the Transhuman nightmare he would bring upon Man possible. He gloated at how easy it had been too, calling it “the most cheap and easy triumph in the world…” (85)

For the next two centuries philosophers and mathematicians, all of them backed by the weight of the now fully metastasized British Empires academic apparatus, would attempt to refute Berkeley. None of them even came close and with the advent of Quantum Mechanics, Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, Quantum Entanglement and the indeterminate nature of the Universe as irrefutably proved by Bell’s Theorem, academics would now have to bow down before Berkeley and admit their defeat.

Citations

64 – Rudd, Steve. ” Reflections and Inquiries Concerning the Virtues of Tar Water (Turpentine) George Berkeley (Bishop of church) 1744 AD: “Tar Water cured insanity?”.” The History of Psychiatry: 1500 BC – 2013 AD. 2013. Web. http://www.bible.ca/psychiatry/reflections-and-inquiries-concerning-the-virtues-of-tar-water-george-berkeley-1744ad.htm65 – Ibid.66 – Berkeley, George and Edited by Jonathan Bennett. “Principle 103.” The Principles of Human Knowledge. 1710. Pp 39. Web. https://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/berkeley1710.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2nbU-F6o8slRxecrs4I7QKw_jQVBfi3XvOoQAytdNFUacv9_P8hLS2Wo067 – Florian Cajori (1919). A History of the Conceptions of Limits and Fluxions in Great Britain, from Newton to Woodhouse. Open Court Publishing Company.68 – The Principles of Human Knowledge. “Principle 119.” Pp 44.69 – Ibid. “Introduction 25.” Pp 10.70 – Ibid. “Introduction 1.” Pp 1.71 – Ibid. “Introduction 17.” Pp 7.72 – Ibid. “Introduction 7.” Pp 2.73 – Ibid. “Introduction 18.” Pp 8.74 – Ibid.”Principle 14.” Pp 14.75 – Ibid.”Principle 15.” Pp 14.76 – Ibid.”Principle 25.” Pp 17.77 – Ibid.”Principle 27.” Pp 17.78 – Ibid.”Principle 91.” Pp 36.79 – Ibid.”Principle 27.” Pp 17.80 – Ibid.”Principle 30.” Pp 18.81 – Ibid.”Principle 31.” Pp 18.82 – Ibid.”Principle 32.” Pp 18.83 – Ibid.”Principle 66.” Pp 29.84 – Ibid.”Principle 81.” Pp 33.85 – Ibid.”Principle 93.” Pp 37.

Cover: Pin page

Below are two links where you can purchase Those Who Would Arouse Leviathan. I would suggest you buy it in hardcopy, not because I make more, I actually make the most from Amazon E books, but because you will avoid giving Amazon any money. Frankly you should be shooting Amazon employees in the street, Google too.

Those Who Would Arouse Leviathan by Jack Heart, Hardcover | Barnes & Noble® (barnesandnoble.com)

Amazon.com: Those Who Would Arouse Leviathan: Memoir of an awakening god: 9781736288016: Heart, Jack: Books

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jackheart.substack.com/subscribe