Jane Doe And Her Lawsuit Against Leon Black (Part 3) (3/29/26)

What's up everyone and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.

In this episode we're going to pick right up where we left off with the Leon Black lawsuit

that was filed by the girl with autism.

As that fourth above, Black's assault lover is detailed by plaintiff and her contemporaneously

kept notebooks.

Lockdown Madison Avenue to 71st Street.

My redacted is lost or fucking mined, even though Galaine said it was best to take me home

because Mr. Black is so important for some reason over my health.

There is going to be hell to pay, I ruined their trip and I am dramatic and what the fuck

that fat fuck bit me.

He threw me on the floor and blood all over Jeffrey's carpet and on the issue.

Who the fuck bites someone sick?

No one is that important and Leon can go fuck himself, I hate New York.

In a journal entry after the above one plaintiff wrote Leon Black next to a poem she cut and

pasted into the notebook, having underlined the words in the poems such as Fatso and Millionaire.

Plaintiff was trafficked by Elizabeth and others, to many other men, both before and after

Black, the violent and sadistic nature of Black's rape left an indelible mark on her, both

physically and psychologically.

Plaintiff suffered internal abrasions in a rectum that continued to cause her pain.

To this day plaintiff often is triggered, each month at the beginning of her menstrual

cycle as the sight of blood from her body causes plaintiff to suffer from panic attacks,

reliving the attack that she endured by Black's hands.

6.

Black's other victims threw Epstein.

Upon information and belief, plaintiff is not the only female who Epstein and Black sexually

violated.

For example, on March 13, 2023, in the matter of Jane Doe 1 vs. Deutsche Bank, index number

22 CIV-10018 J.S.R., Southern District of New York, the District Court heard oral arguments

on the defendant's motion to dismiss.

As part of Jane Doe 1's claims, she alleged that, there came a time when Epstein forced

Jane Doe 1 to give massages to his powerful friends.

During some of these massages, Jane Doe 1 was sexually abused by force and against her

will by Epstein's friends by whom she had been required to do massage.

To a bank introduced a release agreement between Jane Doe 1 and Epstein in support of its

motion to dismiss, this release included a carve out of Jane Doe 1's claims against Black,

as well as other individuals, James Jess Staley, a former banker who Black introduced Epstein

in around 2000.

At oral argument, the portion of the release were read into the record, including in the

relevant part that, while the parties do not believe there is any reasonable interpretation

that this general release could be construed to release James Jess Staley, Leon Black, or

their respective entity affiliations.

For clarity, this general release and settlement agreement specifically does not include James

Jess Staley, Leon Black, or any other company or entity which either is or was, beneficially

owned or controlled by James Staley, or Leon Black, as a release or release party under

this general release and settlement agreement.

Of course, if Black had not engaged in sexual misconduct or other torturous claims against

Jane Doe 1, there would have been no reason to include them in the carve out along with

Jess Staley.

Additionally, beginning in August 2019, the US Virgin Islands conducted extensive investigations

into Epstein's ex-trafficking activities, culminating in a lawsuit against Epstein's

estate.

That lawsuit was settled between the office of the Attorney General for the USVI and Epstein's

estate in December of 2022 for over 100 million.

As part of the USVI's investigation into Epstein, in August of 2020, Black was served

with subpoenas from the USVI.

The subpoenas to Black sought extensive financial documents and tax information relating to Epstein

and entities controlled by Epstein, including Southern Trust, the entity Epstein used to

operate in little saying James.

In September of 2020, the NYT, New York Times, disclosed that Black had deposited 158 million

in Southern Trust's account between 2013 and 2017.

Thereafter, Black came under intense scrutiny from Wall Street contingencies and other interested

parties.

And then October of 2020, the El Protect Black's reputation, Deckard LLP, was retained

to investigate Epstein's ties to Black and to Apollo.

During Deckard's private investigation, it wrote a report that it filed with the Securities

and Exchange Commission.

The Deckard Report revealed that Black claimed he paid Epstein 158 million to Epstein, who

possessed neither a college degree nor any advanced degrees related to tax advisement or a

estate planning.

For the overall value, he believed Epstein was providing to him through Epstein's advice

on trust and estate planning, tax issues, philanthropic issues, and the operation of Black's

Family Wealth Management Office.

According to the Deckard Report, Epstein offered his most valuable piece of work to Black

in 2012, which was advice related to Black's grantor retained a newity trust that reportedly

saved Black as much as one billion or more and tax liabilities.

Black has never explained why Epstein performed this grant work other than Paul Weiss when

the firm provided legal work for Apollo and Black for decades and several Paul Weiss partners

are considered our nation's top leading tax and estate planning lawyers.

On July 21, 2023, the New York Times reported that Black agreed to pay the U.S. Virgin Island's

office of the Attorney General $62.5 million in order to avoid possible claims stemming

from his relationship with Epstein.

Black entered into the settlement agreement with the U.S. V.I. on January 20, 2023 following

mediation.

According to the New York Times, some victims of Mr. Epstein, who had received settlements

directly from his estate, were granted permission by the estate's executors to pursue claims

against a handful of men who had socialized with Mr. Epstein according to a person with

knowledge of the matter.

Mr. Black was one of those men.

Based on the above, it's clear that Ms. Doe is not the only victim above Epstein and

Black.

The calls of action, victims of gender-motivated Violence Protection Act, VGM, VPL.

Plaintiff hereby repeats and realleges each and every allegation in the preceding paragraphs

as those set forth fully herein.

The above described conduct of defendant Black, including but not limited to defendant

Black sexual assault and rape of plaintiff, constitutes a crime of violence and a crime

of violence motivated by gender against plaintiff as defined by the NYC victims of gender

motivated Violence Protection Act, VGM, VPL.

As amended NYC Edmund Code Section 10, 1101.

The above described conduct of Black, including but not limited to defendant Black sexual assault

and rape of plaintiff, constitutes a crime of violence against plaintiff and is a crime

of violence motivated by gender as defined in Section 10, 1103.

The term crime of violence means an act or a series of acts that would constitute a

misdemeanor or felony against the person as defined in state or federal law or that

would constitute a misdemeanor or felony against property as defined in state or federal

law.

If the conduct presents a serious risk of physical injury to another, whether or not those

acts have actually resulted in criminal charges, prosecution or conviction.

In the term crime of violence motivated by gender means a crime of violence committed

because of gender on the basis of gender and due at least in part to an animus based

on the victim's gender.

As a direct and approximate result of the aforementioned crime of violence and gender,

motivated violence plaintiff has sustained in the past and will continue to sustain monetary

damages, physical injury, panic suffering, and serious psychological and emotional distress

entitling her to an award of compensatory and punitive damages, injunctive and declaratory

relief, attorney fees and costs, and other remedies as this court made them appropriate

damages as set forth in Section 10-1104.

The above described conduct of defendant black constitutes a sexual offense as defined

an article 130 of the New York penal law article 130.

Following the Section 10-1105A, this cause of action is timely because it's commenced

within the two years and six months after September 1, 2022.

The Prayer for Relief

Wherefore, plaintiff prays at the court, enter judgment, enter favor, and against defendant

containing the following relief.

A, a declaratory judgment that actions, conduct, and practices of defendant complained

of herein, violate the laws of the state of New York and the city of New York.

An injunction and order permanently restraining defendant and any and all persons acting in

concert with them from engaging in any such further unlawful conduct, including the conduct

complained of herein.

An award of damages against defendant, or any jointly or is severally liable entity

or person in an amount to be determined at trial, plus pre-judgment interest to compensate

plaintiff for all monetary or economic damages.

An award of damages against defendant, or any jointly or severally liable entity or

person in an amount to be determined at trial, plus pre-judgment interest to compensate

plaintiff for all non-monetary and compensatory damages, including but not limited to compensation

for a physical injuries and emotional distress.

An award for damages of any and all monetary and non-monetary losses suffered by plaintiff,

including but not limited to reputational harm in an amount to be determined at trial,

plus pre-judgment interest.

An award of punitive damages and any applicable penalties and or liquidated damages in an

amount to be determined at trial, pre-judgment interest, on all amounts due, an award of

costs that plaintiff has incurred in this action, including but not limited to expert

witness fees, as well as plaintiff's reasonable attorney fees, and costs to the fullest extent

permitted by law and such other and further relief as the court deemed just and proper.

Jerry Demand

Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by Jerry on all issues of fact and damages dated

herein.

This document was dated November 7, 2024, and it was signed by Jean M. Christensen from

Wig Door.

All right, folks, so we're going to be diving deep into this lawsuit between Leon Black

and this Jane Doe, and there's plenty to get to, but that's going to do it for this

one.

All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.