LESLIE KEAN TALKS VARGINHA CASE AND HOW THE ALIEN BODIES SHOULD BE REVEALED

0:00All right, so Leslie Kane, one of the major reasons that we got that New York Times article back in 2017, she has been outspoken about a lot of stuff. She's been an advocate for the UAP disclosure and has been, is about as close with everyone else. I think she was even on at Capitol Hill when David Grush was making his announcement recently over the last couple of months. And I think this is an older interview, but it's still relevant because I don't know how much it's been covered. So props to the interstellar ex account for posting this because I wanted to go over it because I think it was the beginning of this year when James Foxx had the doctor from the Virginia case. If you're not familiar with the Virginia case, it's one of the most talked about cases in the UAP community. General should be talked about in a lot of places to be completely honest with you, but the

1:05bridge version of it is that if you go and you watch moment of contact, the James Fox documentary really breaks it down very well. But in Brazil, there was this event that had happened and it wasn't just one or two people. It was various, various amounts of people who saw not only a craft, but they were at bodies and potential beings walking around and it's been documented over I think it was in 1986 when it happened. So this year when the doctor came out and talked about the stuff that he had experienced and the encounter that he had with the being that these bodies were taken and other whether it was US, that's what people are saying that took the bodies, but Leslie came was on this podcast and she talked about the bodies of these supposed beings and check out what she said here. Russian others have always made the connection between what we call biologics and crash retrievals. But what's interesting to me about the James Fox movie is it's something concrete that

2:08makes that connection, right? It's documented. It's not classified. It's a case in which there was a crash and then there were live beings that were well documented that were captured by the military that were taken to hospitals. And eventually we're taken away by the United States. So it's an extremely well documented case. So I just love the fact that we may get more attention on the sort of biologic side of this as a result of his film. Yeah. And other efforts that are going to be taken place around that. Yeah. Which we'll see over the next few weeks. And just to say that I think what's important about the biologics is the argument can be made that release of information about the biologics is not a national security concern. These are studies that have been done on tissue or whatever or bodies. You can't argue the way you can argue with technology that it affects national security. Obviously, we don't want the Russians in Chinese to understand the technology that we've

3:11reverse engineered or created, right? Yeah, exactly. You can be weaponized or whatever. This is just a body that exists of a non-human being and it is absolutely proof that we're not alone. And it's proof that is not a threat to national security. Exactly. It's like the nut of the question really. I mean, that's like sort of in terms of are we alone or are we not? You know, I think that that goes right to the heart of it. And the argument can be made in petitioning the government for, you know, once we can get it to a credible level, the biologics. Now, one can make the argument that this should be revealed because the normal argument that's used, which is national security, doesn't apply here. So what is going to be the argument for withholding that information? And what I love about the Virginia case that James has documented is it's sort of a springboard into that level of inquiry because it's such a documented case of live living beings. So you know, it takes it to that, into that world to me, as I see it in a very credible

4:14way. And I would allow us to ask new kinds of questions regarding, you know, the release of biological information if we can't release technological information. So I'm very fascinated by that as being sort of a possible unfolding narrative that will happen over the next year. I don't know where it's going to go, but I'm very interested in that. And there is going to be some interesting developments that will occur around that case over the next year. So now, again, don't get your hopes up too high about whether or not the information of this case will be released in the next year. Because I think that, as I said, I think this interview was a little older and she could have been necessary. She could have been referring to that interview or that conference rather with James Fox and the doctor and other people in the beginning of the year, which was still relevant and still, you know, the case wasn't going away. But I don't know if that was what she was referencing to in this particular interview.

5:16But the other things too, I don't think she necessarily said 100% that she, it seems as she does think that they are real and that it did happen. It was well documented, but it didn't seem so much where it was like, well, these are real. They're going to come out in the next year and people got to be ready for it. It was our points were more than valid. And one of the biggest issues to show what's really going on here when they use the excuse of national security, that what is the national security risk of saying, hey, we have proof that we have discovered beings from somewhere else that we are trying to figure out. And we are actually working in tandem with other governments to find out what they have and to find out what it is. But that to me, if this does or ever does come out, just shows that it's more so that they've known for a very long time, especially if it was 96 that they had these things, this would

6:18just further show that they've been covering it up and doing that on purpose and continuing to do a cover up, which I think is irresponsible and unfair to the rest of the, um, the population to know these types of things because again, Leslie can't says there, which I agree with is, and I've always agreed with that if there is technology that we have the China has that Russia has Germany has it whoever has, um, any, any country has you have to be careful to share what you have first or what you have at all because you don't want the other country to get the advantage in the same way when you compare it to what happened with Avonheimer and the things that was, that was the race to what they were, everybody was trying to do was creating the nuclear bomb and all that.

7:20You want to believe, you know, that you're going to have like this, um, moment of the world coming together to say, okay, maybe this stuff is minuscule really fighting over here. Even the other day when you had the guy from Parleman who was talking about the other things that were important and the reason why he doesn't pay attention to the UAP thing or, or not doesn't pay attention to it, but has been kind of pushed. Why are you even giving your attention to that when you should be doing this? Um, this type of story that if these bodies were announced to be real and that proof him out to be how it, I think it's more so of not only would how the US would handle it, it's how the world would handle it, right? And that's always been another argument outside of the national security thing. It's been, can people handle it? What would beliefs be?

8:20What would all those types of thing if this was the case? Um, I always push back and I think that they made, they've made cases of this and I recently in the disclosure day. Now if it's just the existence of other creatures from, or other beings from other places and we don't know where we just say we have these bodies and they are not of this earth. And that's the only announcement. I don't think that necessarily should question religion or anything to because that's like it's a big frickin universe, you know, who's to say that, you know, whatever, wherever you believe or whatever religion you believe in that, that your deity said, this is where I'm creating this. This is what I'm doing here. This is what I want this to be here and you're going to be all the way out there and you're going to be all the way out there. Who the hell knows? You can't say yes or no, um, to that. And you can still say, okay, that doesn't question anything that I believe here.

9:23Now there's the then if they're, let's, this is all science fiction stuff that I'm starting to put in my head. I'm just giving you the scenario of the what if happen. They release the bodies and then there's an interview with one of these things and they've got information out of it. And I said, well, we actually put you here and we created you in a lab. That'll question your religion. That would question it. Now who the hell knows if that's anything that happened, but that's, but I could understand if that was held back for a little bit, if that was like, okay, you know, wait, we're not releasing that. Whatever it might be, but they're actually us, the other theories from, from the future. And they know how we got here. They know this. Sure. It would question yourself. Just the announcement of bodies proof that we are not alone. The question is, could we handle it as a society? And I believe that we could. I still wonder though.

10:24I still wonder if that was announced. Would it just get buried in the news? And when people go, okay, great, aliens here here. Did you see what so and so did on TikTok? I don't know. I don't know. I would like to believe that we'd be like, holy shit. The action, they finally announced it to us. But I have been, as I've been saying, I just, I don't trust people to believe in the greater for people. Some people, some people, just the majority of people. I think that it's just more so of, well, we know that's our power. And we're not going to give that to you. And I think that's been going on for way too long for them to give it over. And I agree with everything Leslie Keynes said. I do believe in the Virginia case very much so. I watched that documentary a few times and it's just, it's just a little too coincidental

11:27to me of all the different things. The guy that, if you've never seen a moment of contact, I highly recommend it. The guy who discovers or who discovered the crash initially is civilian. And his retelling of it, and then when James Fox brought him back to the area and his recollection of it and the emotion that came over him when he was going over it again. He's just a normal guy. He's not Daniel DeLewis. And if he was acting, you should get him in movies because it's one of the best performances I've ever seen. And I totally believe it to be authentic. But take a look at it. Let me know what you think of it. And in general, what do you think about this story? Do you think that this case is legit? And do you think that this case will ever see the light of day as far as acknowledgement of what really went down there? Put your thoughts in there. Let me know. And I'll see you real soon. Bye.