Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsSep 11, 20261:19

Lindsay Clancy’s Insanity Defense | Oakland News

About this episode

Lindsay Clancy’s legal team is pushing hard to stop a second murder trial, filing a motion to declare her not guilty by reason of insanity — a bold move after the first jury deadlocked. The defense argues she was in the grips of postpartum psychosis when she killed her three children, insisting the real question isn’t whether she was ill — it’s what illness she had. Prosecutors countered with evidence of her planning and medical visits, claiming she knew right from wrong. Now, the prosecution must decide: go forward with another trial or drop the case entirely.

Listen in comfort:
Get a discount on a Soli Pillow: http://solipillow.com/discount/dnn.

Advertise on DNN:
[email protected]

This is an automated, high-level news summary based on public reporting.
Report issues to [email protected].

View sources & latest updates:
https://sources.thednn.ai/ac7b41bd0f0a4e6d

Get every episode summarized

Each time Oakland News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now! publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

20 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Lindsay Clancy’s Insanity Defense | Oakland News

Oakland News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

0:00
1:19

Full transcript

Oakland News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!Lindsay Clancy’s Insanity Defense | Oakland News. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

Lindsay Clancy's legal team is making a move to prevent a second murder trial. They filed a motion asking the judge to declare her not guilty by reason of insanity. This is a significant step after the jury in her first trial couldn't reach a verdict, leading to a mistrial. The defense argues that the prosecution doesn't have enough evidence to prove Clancy was of sound mind when she tragically killed her three young children. They've never disputed that she committed the acts, but the core of their defense has been that she was suffering from postpartum psychosis. Experts on both sides apparently agreed Clancy had a mental illness. The debate according to the defense wasn't about if she was ill, but which illness she had. Under the law, prosecutors had to show she either wasn't mentally ill or that she knew her actions were wrong and could control them. The prosecution, however, presented evidence of her actions leading up to the killings like planning a party and attending doctor's appointments, too. Argue she was aware of what she was doing.

They believe she knew the nature and consequences of her actions. Now, it's up to the prosecution to decide their next move. They haven't indicated whether they plan to pursue a second trial for the 36-year-old former nurse. From your city, powered by AI, this is Oakland News Today.

More episodes

More from Oakland News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

View all episodes →