0:00
Oh and welcome back to Morning Trade Live. It's time now for the big picture so let's welcome
0:04
in Lizanne's orders chief investment strategist Schwab Center for the Natural Research.
0:07
A very good morning to you Lizanne. So my previous guest Philip Deel called this market
0:13
whistling through the graveyard which I really liked. Obviously we've got talk of talks
0:18
for a ceasefire with no confirmation. We do have the energy risk premium being priced in here
0:23
and some of the data starting to flash stagflation rewarding signals. How would you characterize
0:29
the markets this week? So I think one of the the facets of market action over the past
0:36
month that maybe gets under reported is is just how short-term oriented a lot of the money is.
0:43
It is kind of swirling around in the market and leading to a lot of these rapid fire rotations
0:48
and even when you get some sort of actual narrative shift or headline changes we make assumptions
0:54
that what's embedded in market action is okay the market is now viewing and a de-escalation
1:01
happening in the near term and not a long drawn out military conflict and I'm not sure that's
1:06
the calculus at play. There's so much more short-term money gambling oriented money in the market
1:11
both on the part of retail traders but also you know CTAs and systematic hedge funds long short
1:18
hedge funds and I do think that there is some complacency here when you when you broaden out the
1:25
lens to the impacts of this lasts for a significantly long period of time. And you feel like some of
1:33
that short-term gambling is playing out in areas like the semi-v software spread I mean it just like
1:39
looks as if it's a ping-pong match going between those two sectors in softwares and hardware.
1:45
So then Lizanne if this conflict is wrapped up soon do we then go back to the pre-war playbook or
1:53
has something fundamentally changed in this market? To me something has fundamentally changed and
2:00
it's similar to what fundamentally changed during the worst part of the pandemic when there was
2:05
this global realization of the necessity of more diversified supply chains and that's clearly
2:10
what we're experiencing now given that the straight-of-promise as a choke point has no other options.
2:15
That of course is led to a huge build-up of storage and then production shutdowns not to mention
2:22
what has happened from a military standpoint and taking out in the case of cutter you know big chunk
2:28
of that LNG capabilities and and you know they've already come out and said that's a three to
2:34
five-year rebuild process. You think about the constraints on getting fertilizer through
2:41
that cannot be turned back on very quickly that feeds into crop output and food prices.
2:47
So I do think that this is for slightly different reasons especially given what's happened with
2:53
Ukraine going after a straight that Russian oil comes through we're sort of exacerbating the
2:59
problem now and that has been a little bit kind of second-page news. So I do think we're rethinking
3:06
especially the supply chain piece of this again circumstance is different than the pandemic but
3:11
it does have bring with some similarities. So then what is the concern? What is the knock-on effect
3:18
of that sort of long-lasting impact then? I mean you know is it recession because you know I've
3:24
been asking various guests what their checks are telling them. My previous guest said 50-50 you're
3:29
starting to see you know 20-30% chance from you know some of the more sort of high-profile Wall Street
3:37
analysts here. I'm just wondering you know what you're modeling as far as sort of the long-term
3:41
effect in this market then. So I'm not sure you can think about a an across the economy recession
3:49
as having very elevated odds right now. That said we haven't had a full economy recession
3:58
really since the global financial crisis. Yes we had the COVID related recession which is
4:02
incredibly short-lived. What we've had though throughout the course of the early part of the
4:07
pandemic through to the present time are these rolling recessions. You get these sectoral recessions
4:13
where different pockets of the economy for different reasons come under constraint. We saw
4:17
in broad manufacturing only recently seemed to be pulling ourselves out of recession conditions
4:22
in manufacturing. You had the offsetting strength on the services side of the economy. So my base case
4:28
at this point is that we will continue to have these rolling recessions somewhat obviously as we
4:34
look at the current backdrop sustainable increase in oil prices or sustainably high oil prices
4:40
could feed into sectoral recessions in some of those consumer oriented areas or companies that
4:46
have energy costs as a big part of their input. So I think that's the way to think about recessions
4:53
is the possibility that they continue in this rolling way. There are opportunities within the market
4:59
given what you're saying here. You have said that the Fed is in a pickle. So let's talk about some
5:05
of the headlines we got this morning. Jobs to 10K good news whoo can perhaps pre-decide relief on
5:12
that front but then Lizanne you get the OECD expecting inflation of 4.2% versus 2.6%.
5:20
How much of a pickle is the Fed in? Oh I very much so right now. Now I think it is somewhat
5:27
premature to assume that the market is right in pricing in a rate height. That is not our base case
5:36
at this point. The Fed of course is still data dependent. We get new data points every day but they
5:42
are at the mercy of operating with a dual mandate. Most global central banks only have a single
5:47
mandate which is inflation and that's why you're seeing this upward pressure now and assumptions
5:52
about needs for tire monetary policy because the Fed has that second mandate of the labor market
5:59
to the extent we see continued weakness in the labor market. I think that reinforces
6:04
worst case scenario that the Fed just stays on hold. I don't think it would be their inclination
6:11
even with energy field inflation in an environment where we see significant weakness in the labor
6:17
market to consider hiking rates. That said if we are able to see a maintenance of this incredibly
6:24
resilient labor market claims being a leading indicator proxy for that then I think you do need to
6:31
start to consider maybe that the Fed has to think about tightening policy. It's a tricky balancing
6:36
at Lizanne. Thank you so much for joining us today really really insightful. I really appreciate
6:41
your analysis. Lizanne Saunders at Chief Investment Strategist Schwab Center for Financial Research.