Loading...
Loading...

All America, all the time, sit down, buckle up and get ready for the Dan Bongino show.
You know, when I was actively involved in politics in Maryland, I'm walking out of an
event one time, right?
And this very, very smart, older gentleman who've been involved in Maryland politics
on the Republican side for probably close to 30 years.
He says to me, I'm going to tell you something, I watched your speech inside.
He said, I liked it.
He said, but one of the things I'd encourage you to do is avoid assertions and ask more
questions.
I said, really, why is that?
He said, because when you ask a human being a question, no matter what, even if they
hate you, the human mind can't stop trying to answer the question.
No matter what, it just engages the mind better than an assertion.
He says, if you're talking to a voter who may lean a little liberal, but maybe open to
voting for you, he's like, if you just make an assertion for them, they big government
sucks.
I don't want to hear it, you're most.
But if you ask him a question, tell me how big of a big government's worked for you.
It'll engage them.
And I thought that's genius.
And I've, for gosh, I don't know how long when they've run for office 15 years ago or
something like that.
I've practiced that ever since.
So I put in the headline today and then on social media, MAGA Civil War or Liberal
Media BS.
And I'll answer for you right now.
It is obviously Liberal Media BS.
Ladies and gentlemen, there is no MAGA Civil War going on.
I don't know how many polls, whether they're CNN, Harriet and polls, real clear politics.
I have a poll coming up.
I'll show you a bunch of them, receipts matter.
There is no Civil War in the MAGA movement.
I'm not telling you that there's not disagreements about significant policies in the MAGA movement.
Some tariffs to Iran, to our dealings with Israel, of course there are disagreements.
But you suggesting there's some kind of massive Civil War getting ready to fracture us like
San Andreas Fault, you have to back that up.
You made the assertion, not me.
If you're telling me there's a Civil War, back it up, show me some substance.
The answer is you can't.
Because the polling data when you ask real people in the real world shows overwhelming
majorities of Republicans support this president's policies.
I'm just telling you, bro, those are the facts.
You make the assertion, back it up.
I've got a bunch of stuff for you today.
And please don't fall for this because the Liberal Media is fertilizing this ground of
the pseudo-magical Civil War because there's nothing they want more.
They want a Civil War.
They want us into cannibalism theory.
You know cannibalism theory.
I talk about it all the time.
How the left, whenever they win elections because there's power in cancelling people, they
start to cancel themselves on the left side.
Don't do that.
Don't pay back to favor by doing that here.
Pete Higgs at Secretary of War with Dan Kane this morning gave an amazing briefing.
We'll play a little bit of that.
I've got a big show for you today.
Folks, today's show brought to you by Brickhouse Nutrition.
Brickhousenutrition.com.
Go pick up lean today if you have a few pounds to lose.
I did.
I used the product LEA and Brickhousenutrition.com slash Dan, check it out.
Today's show also brought to you by Patriot Mobile.
Every time I say Patriot Mobile, I say it so dramatically.
Hey, it's a critical moment for our country.
The opposition's growing really aggressive.
They're not apologizing at all.
And the fight is now reaching into everyday decisions we make.
Patriot Mobile has been standing on the front lines with us, fighting for freedom for
more than 12 years, an amazing company, incredible company.
They don't just deliver top tier wireless service.
They're activists like me who truly care about the country and they're not shy about
it at all.
Support companies that support us in our values.
Patriot Mobile is one of them.
They give you prioritized premium access on all three major networks giving you the
same or better coverage in the main carriers.
Can't beat that.
It means fast speeds and dependable nationwide coverage back by 100% U.S.
Space customer support.
They also offer unlimited data plans, mobile hotspots, international roaming and more
with simple, seamless activation.
You can switch in minutes, keep your number, keep your phone or upgrade.
And here's the difference.
When you switch to Patriot Mobile, you support a company that provides a powerful stream of
giving to help the Christian conservative movement.
Yes.
Good for you, Patriot Mobile.
Take a stand today.
Go to patreonmobile.com slash Dan or call 972 Patriot and use promo code Dan for a free
month of service.
Don't wait.
That's patreonmobile.com slash Dan or call 972 Patriot.
Thank you.
Patriot Mobile.
That's Justin Man in the con today.
Guy looking over his shoulder like this, intently watching, observing, watching, judging.
He's got his don't get dead shirt on the judging, watching.
Okay.
So Secretary of War, Pete Hankseth gave a briefing this morning and I want you to pay very
close attention.
Two short snippets from it, but they're I think the most important.
The whole thing was important.
These, I think, are the most important to get out there, folks.
You cannot wage a war as a foreign adversary of the United States.
As any country, you cannot wage a war without command, control, and communications.
Now look at those three seas, command.
Do they have command?
They're all freaking dead.
I'm just telling you the obvious.
We wiped out their entire hierarchy of upper level Mala leadership.
You're now getting into kind of the mid level leadership and they're going to be wiped out
soon too.
President Trump even said as much yesterday, they don't have command because the command of
the IRGC and elsewhere, their special units, their police forces are dead.
So command, no good control.
If you don't have command, you certainly don't have control because there's nobody to control
because the command is dead.
Every time someone steps in to take control, after a previous commander stepped in and
is wiped out, that person dies too.
It is very difficult to maintain command or control without command and no control because
you're dead and the threat of death is on the horizon.
When you worried about dying, you're not so much worried about tactical deployments.
Finally, communications.
They don't have communications, folks.
I can't go into too many intimate details, given kind of the things I was exposed to.
However, it is very difficult and I think this is fairly obvious.
You can read about it in open source.
It is very difficult for Iranian commanders trying to control their military, you get what
I did there, right?
If you can't communicate because every time you communicate, eh, it doesn't really work
out.
They have none.
It is led to total chaos.
Now we're not even a weekend yet.
Again, I don't want to jump to either side, we're not doing mission accomplished bullshit.
All I've asked respectfully, respectfully, and I mean it to opponents of the military
strikes.
I'm not kidding.
I respect your opinions.
I'm glad we're not a bunch of robots.
I've got Sean Davis from the Federalist on later.
I love good friend of mine.
Has some different opinions on me, but the filibuster, other things, that's fine.
That's fine.
That's the best part about being a conservative.
Is we can, we're not freaking robots like the left.
However, all I ask is that if you're going to judge the movie in total, in total, just
wait for the movie to end.
It's fair to you to, and by the way, maybe you think the beginning of the movie sucked.
I saw a movie once about where I forget to a movie I went to when I was in Fletsy in
Georgia.
The first half an hour was terrible.
I almost left and rescued itself.
But I'm free to say it's a good movie, but the first half an hour sucked.
You may not like the beginning.
That's okay.
But if you're going to judge the whole movie, just wait for the movie to end.
And it's, we're not even a weekend.
This is Secretary of War, Hegseth this morning talking about those three seas I told you
about.
Command, control, and communication and how it's like scripting a football game as the
offensive coordinator, basically wiping out the coach and everyone else.
Now they don't even know, no one even knows how to get in the huddle anymore.
This is a great analogy.
Check this out.
We will avenge them.
No doubt.
But I liken Iran's predicament to a football team who scripted the first 20 plays of a
game.
The team knew what plays to run because their first few drives were scripted.
But now that the game has started and the blitz is on, they don't know what plays to call,
let alone how to get in the huddle and call those plays.
Iran's senior leaders are dead.
The so-called governing council that might have selected a successor, dead, missing, or
cowering in bunkers, too terrified to even occupy the same room.
Senior generals, mid-level officers, enlisted ranks, they can't talk or communicate let alone
mount a coordinated and sustained offensive.
That's not great for morale.
The Iranian Air Force is no more built for 1996, destroyed in 2026.
The Iranian Navy rests at the bottom of the Persian Gulf.
Combat ineffective, decimated, destroyed, defeated, pick your adjective.
One of many 63 in the chat, Dan, I'm totally anti-war, but some people just need to be blown
up.
Try to pick the best chats of the day, one of many 63.
I'm with you.
Anti-war, I'm not trying to be an asshole about it, but nobody likes war.
Sometimes unfortunately in a complicated world, full of real evil demons, and I'm telling
you that folks, there is evil is real.
It is not some fantasy you read about in some fairy tale and third grade, it is very real.
In a world full of evil, sometimes good men have to step up and stop that stuff by aggression
and violence.
We wish it weren't the case, but it is.
How many people are they going to kill?
How many times are we going to let them threaten us with a potential nuclear weapon?
You understand, this is one of the things I'd like, and I'm going to play another clip
of Secretary Hankseth in a second, so this is a good one too, about what complete control
of the sky is actually means.
Remember, command control communications, you're missing one of those three, your war
efforts screwed, you're missing all three, you are in real freaking trouble.
I'm just telling you, having spent a good year involved in the stuff, folks, these
Iranian mullahs get a nuclear weapon, there's not going to be a negotiation.
There's not going to be a negotiation.
You know that Netflix movie that Catherine Bigelow movie about the nuclear strike, it's
exaggerated a lot of it, I get it.
However, if you watch the movie, it's, I think it's interesting, it's one of those movies
again where that's one of those movies where the beginning is great and the ending I think
was terrible.
So you can judge a whole movie, but you still got to wait till you end, oh, this is awesome
and it ends and you're like, what, you know the movie I'm talking about, I don't remember
the name, but I saw it in DC with Paula, interesting movie, exaggerated if you understand
how the whole system works and everything, but it's about a nuclear, a real nuclear strike,
what would what it would look like and how quickly all this goes down.
If they get a nuclear weapon, there's nothing stopping them from using, they don't practice
or intend on practicing the former Iranian mullah regime, mutually assured destruction.
They're not worried about dying at all.
It's just assured destruction to them, they don't care about the mutual part, they don't
care about their people, they don't care about dying, they will launch a nuclear weapon
at us the second they get it, because they can, that's it, well, why would they do that?
That's dumb, because they're evil, I just said that.
President Trump is clearly laid out with Secretary Rubio and Secretary Hegsat that their efforts
to build a ballistic missile and drone shielded nuclear program that would basically make
it asymmetric warfare for us, taking it out in the future, it's just not going to happen,
we're taking it out now.
You may not like the beginning of that movie in the Republic, but I don't care what
the left these think in the Republican party, that's fine.
Have it out, respectfully, I'm open to it, however, I agree.
Folks, the United States military has completely wiped out, I want you to understand, the battle
damage assessments here are off the charts, okay?
The Iranians had their air defense systems supplied by other foreign adversaries of the
United States, the Russians, their stories in the Wall Street Journal and other outlets
about China's efforts to army run with anti-ship missiles that can take out some of our ships
right off their shores there.
This is a real problem, a real problem.
President Trump acted decisively now to head off what could potentially be nuclear hostilities
and a world war later, and I'll bring China into this mix in a second.
But I want you to understand the complete, I don't even know how to describe it, disappointment
which seems like understatement of the millennia, that the Iranian mullahs and their military must
have, that they invested all of this money and time in an air defense system from the
Russians and weaponry from the Chinese that totally shit the bed, totally, completely.
We have dominated their skies.
They look up in Iran right now and all they're seeing is US and IDF forces.
There are no Iranian forces in the sky of any significance whatsoever.
They have drones and they're still launching their ballistic missiles which is going down
every day because every time a launcher pops up they know the location, big neon lights
go up, boom, dead.
Hyde is my, height is my tactically, height is might if you're a sniper, height is might
from the skies when it comes to airborne bombardment, height is might, you control the skies,
you control the country.
Here's Secretary Hague said just a few minutes ago talking about how we have complete air
dominance right now, check this out in a few days, in under a week.
The two most powerful air forces in the world will have complete control of Iranian skies,
uncontested airspace.
I hope all the folks watching understand what uncontested airspace and complete control
means.
It means we will fly all day, all night, day and night, finding, fixing and finishing
the missiles and defense industrial base of the Iranian military, finding and fixing
their leaders and their military leaders, flying over to Iran, flying over Iran, flying
over their capital, flying over the RGC, Iranian leaders, looking up and seeing only US
and Israeli air power every minute of every day until we decide it's over.
And Iran will be able to do nothing about it.
Sometimes I say this stuff and I regret not going into it further, you know, why is height
might?
Well, for fairly obvious reasons, I mean, just think about it.
Look at it from a sniper perspective, if you're a sniper behind a wall on a hill shooting
down, the bullets can go down simple physics gravity down, right?
However, if you're shooting up at the sniper in the sniper's nest, the bullets aren't
going to go up in car at least not now until technology gets better if it ever gets.
The bullets aren't going to go up and around and over the wall, it doesn't work that way.
Hight is might also for very simple reasons, if you forget physics, just common sense human
beings can't fly.
You can interdict the target on the ground because you can walk there and at least you have
a shot.
If you don't have the ability to get your aircraft airborne and your ballistic missile
wanchers, silos, and storage sites were taken out, you have nothing to fly into the sky
to interdict that US target.
It's just simple common sense, it's a school of people because it's always got to be like
a Star Wars.
These guys are all Star Wars guys, everyone.
I think it was like on the application process, did we have a box, do you have a fan of
Star Wars?
All of them see if they'd love it.
They should do a Star Wars show in a week under these guys.
Hight is might dominate the skies, you dominate the military exercise.
Folks, the early days of this have gone very well.
The book is still open, the movie is not over, I understand that.
Please do not ever assume on this show that we're telling you, oh, shut your mouth.
I don't want to hear that.
No, absolutely no one on this show is saying that.
I told you, I ran for office against long term, long term presence in Iraq and Afghanistan
and elsewhere.
I've spoken about it at length.
However, we're not in the long term or the medium term stage yet, we're in the short
term.
And I think President Trump has been clear over time.
He does not support nation building.
He has already told the Iranians in absolutely no uncertain terms.
It is yours to take over this country.
This is your opportunity.
Those are his words.
He's not going to be nation building.
Folks, I got to ask a favor of you.
You know, I hate doing that.
I need you to be really, really hyper aware and tena up for foreign influence operations
using social media, trying to divide, divide and conquer the mega coalition from within.
Notice I said in advance, so you don't, please do not confuse the two.
I love the fact that the Republican conservative libertarian old school establishment GOP,
mega coalition, not always the same thing, sometimes they are.
The unissues like taxes, certainly not on foreign hostilities, war.
I love it that we can talk amongst ourselves and check ourselves.
I love that.
What I freaking hate is foreign enemies of the United States taking advantage of that.
And in essence, plumping up divisions within us that don't really exist at that level.
They exist on the issues.
Not oh, this guy's out.
I hate it.
I'm going to bring some receipts and show you exactly what's going on.
Do not fall for it.
The liberal media love this stuff.
There's a symbiote out there of paid doomers.
They don't have any principles at all paid doomers dividing up the right, the liberal media
and foreign adversaries making sure money is flush and available for all those people
to tell you basically to go against the Trump administration on anything they do.
Please don't fall for it.
Now, I told you yesterday, I was going to prove to you that the
MAGA Civil War air quotes is bullshit.
It's not real.
Bring the receipts.
Well, here's a Tom Bevin tweet.
He runs real clear politics.
Oh, good guy.
As a point of reference, five polls are out in operation.
Epic fury.
Pulse.
These are points of reference, folks.
Data.
Correct.
I try to be a smart ass.
It's just true.
On average, 72.2% of Republicans approve of Trump's actions and only 14% disapprove.
The rest are unsure.
Have no opinion.
Guys, ladies, listen, receipts matter.
I know that word drives people crazy, but it's true.
If you can't produce a receipt about your purchase, then you can't prove the purchase
happen.
This is a receipt.
You're asking actual people into a Republican party.
How do you feel about it?
72%.
Okay.
We're at the early stages.
We shouldn't drum the conclusions.
Fine.
But I'm in favor.
That's just a fact.
Would that sound like a MAGA Civil War to you?
72%.
Here you go.
There's the real clear politics average right there.
72% a lot.
Ask a bunch of school kids if they want homework.
You may get more kids.
You always get the nerds in the class, right?
What do you think we are?
Nerds?
Remember Rocky IV?
That's my dad.
I know.
What do you think we are?
Nerds is always nerds.
Always nerds.
I was actually a little nerdy sometimes.
It's seventh grade.
Eighth grade.
I got a little unnery.
Just a little.
72%.
Ah, dad.
That's one tweet.
Five polls.
Here's the other one.
I just saw this morning before we got on the earth.
This didn't take long.
And here's the other one.
New polls show an overwhelming majority of Republicans support the president's strike
in Iran.
Don't buy the media lies.
MAGA is not split on the issue at all.
It's no easy influencers pretending to represent MAGA who have split yet again.
She says again because this is important.
Every single issue President Trump puts out there.
Thank you.
CBS poll on the screen now.
If you're watching Unrumble, check it out if you're listening on Apple or Spotify.
Every single thing Trump does.
You see this conglomerate of liberal media jerk wads, tumors, paid tumors.
I'm not talking about you.
You're free to be a tumor all you want.
I'm talking about the paid tumors.
And you know what I'm talking about.
And foreign money flowing in adversaries to the United States exacerbating these divisions.
Folks, this stuff is real.
Here's a tweet.
I saw yesterday.
Vizagrad.
Foreign adversaries pumping money into this artificial division to make the, the, the
grand canyon seam even wider in the MAGA coalition.
It's not there.
There were tiny little splits.
It's interesting to see this tweet notes how Chinese propaganda accounts marry anti-semitism
and anti-American narratives in their propaganda.
Chinese MSS and its faithful propaganda, they point out this account.
I've gone all out.
China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, truly is the axis of evil.
China loves this stuff.
You're free to have an opinion on whatever you want.
Israel, Iran, gold tariffs, whatever.
But a lot of this stuff is paid bullshit.
And I'm just begging you, get those antenna up and learn to see through it.
Here's another tweet.
I saw about exactly this thing that points out some specific tweets about these agit prop
campaigns meant to divide up by routine.
Jerry Dunleavy.
Jerry's a good reporter.
New CCP run propaganda outlets are promoting the anti-Aran war protests in the US organized
by the Singapore network with CCP Chinese Communist Party, specifically pushing imagery
from the answer coalition and the party for socialism and liberation and quoting people's
forum leaders.
They have the actual propaganda.
Again, how would ever opinion you like?
It's a republic.
But if you're a paid propagandist or a foreign government, I just want you to see through
it.
It's there.
It's just the news.
Chinese state-run media promotes anti-war protests organized by CCP-linked Singapore network.
Folks, the stuff is real.
The stuff is real.
You just have to have a good antenna for it.
And the reason is you're never going to formulate a good output, a solid voting opinion on what
you should do if the inputs are corrupted by foreign money pumped in there.
You can't have corrupted inputs.
These people make stuff up.
I was part of it.
I had this, um, that jerkwad account I pointed out last week, put out some post.
Oh, my damn bond geno ran for office.
He got six million dollars from APEC.
Folks, when I ran for office, we didn't even raise six million dollars total number one.
So it's a fairly obvious math problem.
Second, you know you can go to the FEC website, federal elections commission and look that
up.
And you'll see that that's totally, completely ridiculous observed.
You can look yourself.
Don't take my word for it.
But they know no one will do it.
So they put that out there to try it again.
You're entitled to say, hate my guts.
Go for it.
However, the input that I took six million dollars from APEC is complete total bullshit.
Oh, there it is.
Look, six million dollars, receive six million dollars.
That's interesting.
So go to the FEC website and find that, my six million dollars.
I'll give you six million dollars if you could find it.
That's how confident I am.
I'll try to make it cash.
You got to pay the taxes.
You can get very rich really quick.
It's all made up, the whole thing.
Yeah, that's not a bad picture though.
Can you guys take that picture?
Is it AI generated?
Yeah, Justin just said it.
It's not bad.
I'm actually, I got a face for radio.
Thank you guys.
Except the whole thing is bullshit.
But if you're watching an Apple and Spotify, check that out.
Thumbs up or thumbs down.
Chad, let me know what you think.
I don't know, Justin said the night back.
Here.
Now, video matters, video receipts.
Have tip Nate Friedman from the Nate Friedman show.
He goes out to one of these protests.
Protests to war, all you want.
You have the God-given big alright to assemble.
But don't bullshit people.
A lot of these anti-war protests are not people who are really anti-war.
They're people who are being paid by Soros, Alliance groups and others
to protest the war.
Don't bullshit people.
I'm not being paid to promote anything,
except the sponsors on the show, sponsors the show
and an ad supported show to keep it free.
It's been the business model of media for years.
I am nobody tells me my opinion, no one.
And if you dare, you're off the show.
Period.
Period.
Had tip Nate Friedman.
It's about a minute 30, but it's worth your time.
Watch this guy, this podcaster, it does a great job.
He goes up to these protests and starts asking basic questions,
like, hey, who's funding this stuff?
They melt like cheese on a hot sidewalk in Florida.
Check this out.
All right, so you can see that none of this is grass roots.
This is all paid for.
Hey, how you doing, guys?
Where are we headed with these signs?
We're good, we're good.
Where are we going here?
You guys are saying that this is grass roots,
but this does not look very grass roots.
You guys doing this for free?
Show this to people.
Let's say that any of this is grass roots.
Show it to them, show them this clip.
So all these signs that you see laid out right here
are going to Columbus Circle for a protest
that Roy Neville Singham is paying for, okay?
A CCP billionaire who is trying to sew division
into this country.
He needs to be looked at, Roy Neville Singham.
Oh, here we got more signs.
Oh my God, this is enough, guys.
Wow.
So let's just see how roughly how many signs these are.
They all say PSL, probably George Soros is involved
with PSL.
PSL's fiscal sponsor is the Progress Unity Fund.
And we know from last episode that the sponsor
of the Progress Unity Fund is the Tides Foundation.
George Soros gave the Tides Foundation $40 million.
Answer Coalition, Progress Unity Fund.
If you look at this over here,
you can see answercoalition.org,
which is funded by the Progress Unity Fund,
which is funded by George Soros.
So you got George Soros and you got Roy Neville Singham
funding millions of dollars into this country
trying to sew division.
And now everyone will see that none of this is natural.
It comes from an office that he owns,
called the People's Forum.
It's not, look at me.
Listen, that tip, Nate Friedman.
Please look, I heard a couple of people in the chat
say they really like this guy.
Thank you, man. Don't thank me, thank him.
It's not real.
All this black pill, dumber bullshit, not all of it.
A significant chunk of it is bullshit.
This kid's packing so many receipts,
I just showed you what, five plus polls.
So when you're on social media and elsewhere
and you see the bot brigade out there
with all their bullshit comments,
we ate the juice, whatever.
I'm telling you, it's astroturf.
Folks, we can,
we've been on the air a little over a month now.
We've racked up over 25 million views on rumble alone.
That does in fact are in the videos only on rumble.
But however, we have short little tidbits on places
like Apple and Spotify, some on YouTube.
Apple and Spotify, there's probably another 15 million.
Oh, I'm not, I'm just telling you like all the dumber class
that is like, oh man, that's gonna be an abject failure.
I guess, I guess you're just not correct.
Because I don't bullshit people and never have.
It's happy to serve, I was happy to come back
and I'm happy and honored to have this audience.
However, the other side can't say the same.
They're full of shit.
I'm gonna take a quick break here,
but please don't go anywhere
because this next clip by Peter Schweitzer on Fox
is critical.
I want you to understand why China propaganda outlets,
liberal debags, fake protesters are so committed
to stopping these Iranian hostilities right now
before it gets worse for China.
China, yes, this clip is really important.
Folks, this war right now and it's very, very early stages.
It's not just about Iran.
It's about Russia and China too
and heading off a world war, not engaging in one.
Schweitzer elegantly explains this in about a minute.
So stay tuned, coming up right after this quick break.
So Jasmine and I were talking about how our cars
are basically a second office for us.
She's always in her car too.
Between driving a work, driving to meetings
and running the kids to school and games,
we put some serious miles on both of our cars.
And the more you rely on your car,
the more you start thinking, okay,
what happens when something goes wrong?
So I told Jasmine, she manages the business here.
I said, join me and sign up for car shield.
The peace of mind, it gives you when you depend
on your car as much as we do is absolutely invaluable.
Reduce your anxiety about car problems, get car shield.
It gives you 24, seven roadside assistance,
courtesy towing and rental car options
at no extra cost.
They work with ASC certified mechanics nationwide.
Their plans are month to month.
The deductibles are low, which is huge
when you're already stressed.
They've been doing this for 20 plus years, car shield.
They protect over two million vehicles
and boast a 96% customer review rating.
Make a decision your wallet will love with car shield.
Do it today.
Car shield is offering our audience,
20% off, it's a big discount with the CodeBangino,
B-O-N-G-I-N-O, at carshield.com.
Visit carshield.com, lock in your 2026 protection today,
protect yourself from those expensive car repairs
you know are coming.
Again, go to carshield.com, use CodeBangino
and get 20% off.
Thank you, car shield.
And our next sponsor today is chapter.
You fight every day with a country for your family
and against the system stacked against you.
But let me ask you this,
when was the last time you fought for yourself?
I've been trying to protect my aging family members
and one way to make sure that we're on the right Medicare plant
is using chapter.
Because if they're on Medicare,
they may be overpaying by thousands of dollars a year.
Some companies earn more by steering you into certain places,
meaning your coverage could be shaped by their commission.
Not what's best for you.
That's a fight you can win.
It's an information fight and you can win it.
Under 20 minutes, chapter is a Medicare advisor
that's completely independent.
They don't work for big insurance companies.
They sit down with you, walk through every option
and help you find the plan that fits your needs, your needs.
My audience has averaged $1,100 a year in savings
by calling chapter.
That's money back in your wallet and your pocket.
That's a win you can actually feel.
So dial pound 250 and say Medicare help to speak with chapter.
That's pound 250, Medicare help, 20 minutes folks.
One fight, you don't have to wait on Washington to win.
Pound 250, say Medicare help.
Thank you, chapter.
We appreciate it.
Okay, back to the show.
Why do the Chinese CCP align
agit prop artists out there
and other foreign governments as well?
Have an interest in intervening in US politics
and award decision involving Iran.
Because that's their energy supplier, folks.
This is really simple.
You cannot power a China-based war machine
in a war against Taiwan or anywhere else
if you don't have power, no power, no war machine.
You're not gonna fuel tanks and planes with good will
or fancy poems or tweets.
You need petrochemicals, you need nuclear power
which requires nuclear fuel.
You need all kinds of supply chain mechanisms
to translate that power into movement,
in jets and in ships and in people.
If they don't have power, you can't power the war machine.
Peter Schweitzer, Rizan Fox, just the other day
talking about exactly this.
This is why China needs this to stop now.
They lose Iran, they lose access,
not only to Venezuela and power,
which is already gone and petrochemicals,
but Iranian-based oil too,
which is gonna be a big double barrel middle finger
to the CCP, check this out.
Donald Trump not only reshuffle the deck,
he's laid the cards out for the players
and China now has a terrible hand.
Think about this.
China provided them their most advanced air defense systems
to Iran, totally decimated by the United States
and the Israelis.
China has invested more than $100 billion in Iran,
in industrial energy projects, et cetera.
Much of that in loans to the Iranian government,
they're not going to get that back.
With both Venezuela and Iran,
Donald Trump has effectively taken 20% of China's old supply,
oil supply and reshuffled it.
And here's the thing to remember,
they were buying that oil as a discount
because both Iran and Venezuela are sanctioned
and they were able to buy it not with US dollars.
One of their big goals has been to move away
from the US being the global currency.
They're now going to have to go back
into the global oil market and buy things with US dollars.
So this is a disaster for China on multiple stages.
And Donald Trump has shifted the discussion
that he's going to have with President Xi
when they meet in China almost entirely.
This is critically important.
Couple of pieces of information that came out of that.
Tattoo on the brain.
Now instead of buying discounted sanctioned oil,
they got cheaply because the Russians and others
couldn't sell it anywhere else.
So China said, well, you're going to sell it to us at this price
or you're not going to sell it at all.
They're flipping them the double barrel.
Now all of a sudden in Venezuela and Iran, that's gone.
They still have the Russians.
And the second part of it is just as important.
The whole idea of a replacement currency
for the United States dollar.
The United States dollar is the world's reserve currency.
Most major global transaction finds transactions economically.
Find their way somehow through the US dollar.
Every time that happens, it's like a free loan
to the United States.
You have no idea how bad it'll be
if that were to collapse.
Not in danger of collapsing anytime soon.
If it did, interest rates would go through the roof.
And it forces the Chinese Communist Party
to have to deal with us and give Donald Trump
another shit to go and shit with the sea,
to bargain with when he meets with China's leadership in Xi.
That's why they're so interested in agit prop
and shutting this war down now
because they're seeing right now how badly
this is going for them, no less the Iranians.
This is why the fake bullshit narratives out there
really ticked me off.
The narrative out there that won the left
and the foreign money and all the other bullshit
is now tried to impose upon us
that is totally fake, who's a war for Israel.
That's total bullshit.
I tweeted this out last night and all the bots,
and I get it, I've seen you,
I know what you're doing.
I understand how the whole process works with you losers.
The bots came out and full.
Paid for propagandists.
I tweeted out last night,
if you really believe like Donald Trump
is getting walked into anything against as well,
you don't know him.
You've never worked for him
and you really suck at reading the tea leaves.
Folks, Donald Trump's a lot of things to a lot of people,
to his friends, his family, people who work for him,
getting walked into anything.
I'm sorry, you're just a moron.
He's going to do what he wants to do
based on his analysis of the situation.
And that's a fact.
You're just spouting off on, on ex elsewhere,
you know, elsewhere, just because you have,
you have no evidence to back that up.
So ABC and others are jumping on this bandwagon now,
taking a totally out of context Rubio statement.
I'll show you in a second, in a side by side,
so as Nate Livingstone account put up,
I'll show you how they took it totally out of context
and they take this fractured little bullshit line.
It's a war for Israel.
And now they're exacerbating it everywhere
and you see all the Duma crowd running with this too.
Here's Mary Bruce from ABC yesterday,
still with this bullshit line.
You can actually watch the Rubio clip yourself.
We're going to play it side by side
because he answered it again yesterday
and so did President Trump.
It doesn't matter.
They're still going to run with this
because they think they can fracture the mega coalition
on it, check this out.
President, first and foremost,
is pushing back in that question by our Rachel Scott
to this notion that Israel forced the US's hand here.
And in doing so, he is directly contradicting
what his own secretary of state, Marco Rubio,
told reporters yesterday.
Marco Rubio said that the US faced an imminent threat
because Israel was about to attack Iran
and then Iran was poised to retaliate against the US.
So the US decided to strike first.
The president is saying that's actually not the case.
He says he might have forced Israel's hand.
He says that Iran was going to strike first,
saying, quote, my opinion,
it was my opinion that they were going to attack first.
You see how they can't stop.
They have to just keep going with this.
Rubio answered the question in the negative.
Is this a war for Israel?
His first words were no.
She keeps going back to this.
Well, Rubio said otherwise,
you're just making that up.
About a minute here, but this is worth it.
Here is a side by side.
If you're listening on Apple and Spotify,
this is two days ago when the Rubio statement happened.
And then yesterday where Rubio again,
for like the umpteenth time,
has to educate these idiots
that he never said this was a war for Israel at all.
Just listen to what he said.
Is this hard?
I don't understand, guys.
Like out there are the tumors.
Is this hard?
You can actually listen to what he said
because he said it and it's been recorded digitally,
forever.
Here's the side by side.
You decide for yourself.
Check this out yesterday.
You told us that Israel was trying to strike Iran
and that's why we needed to get involved.
And so the president made the very wise decision.
We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action.
We knew that that would precipitate an attack
against American forces.
And we knew that if we didn't preemptively go after them
before they launched those attacks,
we would suffer higher casualties
and perhaps even hire those killed.
And then we would all be here answering questions
about why we knew that in the end.
No?
Iran was going to get destroyed.
So that's not what I was asked very specifically.
Did we go in because of Israel?
And I said, you were asking me, are you from the follow-up?
And I said, no.
I told you this had to happen anyway.
But one is, no matter what, ultimately,
this operation needed to happen.
That's the question of why now.
But this operation needed to happen
because Iran in about a year or a year and a half
would cross the line of immunity.
Meaning they would have so many short-range missiles,
so many drones that no one could do anything about it
because they could hold the whole world hostage.
Look at the damage they're doing now.
And this is a weakened Iran.
Imagine a year from now.
So that had to happen.
Obviously, we were aware of Israeli intentions
and understood what that would mean for us.
And we had to be prepared to act as a result of it.
But this had to happen no matter what.
This was a question of timing.
Of why this had to happen is a joint operation.
Not the question of the intent.
Once the president made a decision
that negotiations were not going to work,
that they were playing us on the negotiations
and that this was a threat that was untenable,
the decision was made to strike them.
That's what I said yesterday.
And you guys need to play it.
And if you're going to play these statements,
you need to play the whole statement,
not slipping to reach an area that you want to do.
Had to milk bar TV on that.
Folks, when you add the full statement,
it's clear he said the opposite.
Does not award for Israel.
This action was going to happen.
The timeline may have moved up
because of the very fortunate circumstance
that the Mullah class of idiots
decided to have a class meeting in one place in one day
so we didn't have to go hunt them down all over the country.
That does not mean this is a war for Israel
unless you're a credent and too stupid
to process information in a complex manner.
How many times do they have to say this?
Do you ever notice how the Duma class,
they latch on to these issues
in the exact same way the liberal media does?
Does that not like urke you a little bit?
Why are liberal media people who hate us
saying the same thing as the Duma's?
Because the Duma's hates you too.
It's not true.
Here's President Trump yesterday.
And by the way, I love how the Duma's,
they are such, I always say,
Ben Shapiro addresses yesterday.
I love how the Duma's and the Panicans,
they're just so afraid
because they're such cowards and chumps
and you get the rest.
They're so afraid to take on President Trump
because they're over the balls
because they wanna keep their grift going.
That they dance around the edges again,
like President Trump has no agency whatsoever.
President Trump is controlled.
He's a puppet, but they'll never say that.
Israel, Netanyahu, Israel.
Well, who are they controlling?
Somebody, is it Trump?
Oh, no, somebody.
The man, who's the man?
They won't say it.
Because they have no balls.
So they attack surrogates, Rubio, Hegseth.
They do this all the time I saw it for a year.
They have no balls.
They mean President Trump,
but they won't say it because they know they'll get crushed
and they wanna keep the grift going.
Here's President Trump yesterday telling you directly.
It's a war for Israel, it's a war for us
and they've been a pretty damn good partner in it.
Check this out.
The real force you're having to launch these strikes
to get surrogate in the whole United States
into this war.
No, I might have forced their hand.
You see, we were having negotiations
with these lunatics and it was my opinion
that they were gonna attack first.
They were going to attack.
If we didn't do it, they were going to attack first.
I felt strongly about that.
And we have great negotiators, great people,
people that do this very successfully
and have done it all their lives very successful.
And based on the way the negotiation was going,
I think they were gonna attack first
and I didn't want that to happen.
So if anything, I might have forced Israel's hand.
Have balls, you coward grifter bums.
Just say what you mean.
Just say it.
Just say what you mean.
Grow a pair of testicles, you losers.
You don't have the balls because you don't want the grift
to dry up and you know it.
He's being walked around really by who?
What evidence do you have of that?
By the way, if you read Open Source 7,
I'm just telling you what I read in the Wall Street Journal,
it's not any inside information at all.
Now for a couple months, they were actually planning
an attack, it appears a month or a couple weeks ago
and I guess the conditions on the ground were not great
so they called it up.
What was that Israel too?
Folks, I can't say this enough too.
Wait until the movies over until you judge the whole movie.
You can't judge a book when you're only in chapter six of 12.
You can't judge a movie 20 minutes in,
it's an hour and a half long.
Lesson item.
I did kind of a crazy show.
I'm upstairs and I just had had a channel on a movie channel
and I wasn't paying attention
because I was doing something work related
and the next movie just comes on,
whatever it was, stars or whatever.
And Stephen King, me and Stephen King
have had some epic fights on Twitter, the author of course,
that Stephen King was at the long walk
and I'm like, I pull up to the movie after like 20 minutes.
I don't know if you've seen it or not.
These kids have to walk and they can't stop
or they stop walking, they get shot
and only one person, whatever.
So I'm only starting paying attention
about a half an hour and so I see the ending in the movie.
The movie was mildly interesting.
One of the worst endings I think I've ever seen in my life.
Now I can tell you, I'm not even telling that
because it's Stephen King, whatever.
I don't like the guy's politics
but if he writes good stories,
it just would have made a good short story.
It just didn't translate onto a movie screen at all.
But I waited to the end,
but I'm telling you also I missed most of the beginning.
Fair analysis, okay?
So don't take my word for it.
Maybe the beginning is so awesome.
It overrides the shitty ending.
Can you at least wait till the movie ends
before you say the whole thing's a failure?
The Jews did it.
We did it for Israel.
Donald Trump's got walked into this.
Jesus, yes.
Here's what I mean.
Here's Kayleigh McEnany, yes, on yesterday on Fox.
Folks, the early stages, we're in the beginning stages.
We're not even, we're still at the beginning of the beginning.
We're not even in the middle of the beginning.
We're just a couple days in.
People who have wanted to kill,
first we get the Saturday people,
then we get the Sunday people.
People who've wanted to kill us,
who've wanted to kill freedom-loving countries
around the world for decades are now being unalived
and an unprecedented rate.
And it's not just Iranian mullets.
This was an important story yesterday
about a general level, upper level hierarchy,
Iranian proxy lunatic who was wiped out in Lebanon.
And now the Lebanese government is fighting back against
Hezbollah.
We haven't seen that in theions.
What's, I don't understand what's wrong with that.
You want Hezbollah that's actively killed hundreds
of U.S. service people over decades.
You want them to stay in existence for what?
What do you want to play monopoly with them?
Did you miss this yesterday?
This is big dude, tell me how this is a bad thing.
Check this out.
Breaking news, the IDF telling Fox moments ago
that they have eliminated Iran's top commander
overseeing the coups forces in Lebanon.
Now, this individual is described as at the Brigadier General
level, as I mentioned, one of the highest commanders there,
connecting Hezbollah with the Iranian terror regime.
So this is a significant take down in the strike on Tehran.
And it's just the latest out of the Middle East.
That sounds terrible to me, guys.
What are we going to do now?
I mean, unaliving Lebanese Brigadier generals
in Hezbollah that's killed hundreds,
if not in casualty,
why thousands of innocent citizens and U.S. soldiers
and U.S. citizens throughout the years.
That sounds really awful.
We haven't, we're not even in the middle of the beginning.
I'm just trying to keep you updated daily
on the status of these war efforts.
So you can formulate through inputs
and honest opinion about where we stand.
I'm going to take some outside of this show
and some other conservative shows out there.
Everything you're hearing on the media
is complete total bullshit,
outside of like Fox and Newsmax and other shows.
It's total BS.
I saw a guy last night on a,
when he's networks talking about a guy McGregor.
He's been wrong about just about everything.
I don't know, Iranians are performing quite well.
Really, dude, how are they performing quite well?
Dead, bro, performing quite well.
How do a freaking seance and a Ouija board?
Are you on planet Earth?
Is that guy ever been right about anything?
I think I had him on a show once.
I was like, what?
Of course, the Iranian started was a good idea
to attack the Saudis as well.
Let's start another Sunni Shia war.
That's going to work out.
And they figured, I think that the Saudis would come out
and say, oh my gosh, there's so much chaos.
The United States, stop what you're doing.
We can't take this.
Well, that's not working out either.
You've got Hezbollah proxies, Brigadier generals,
unalived, the Mullahs all six feet deep,
probably more than that after these bunker busters
hit their facilities.
Probably about 25 feet deep.
And now you've got the Saudis saying,
hey, man, if we get in this,
we're going to start hitting those targets too over in a minute.
How is this working out for them?
Please explain.
You don't have to believe me.
Here's some news reporting on it from Fox.
Check this out.
Military and diplomatic sources in the region tell me
Saudi Arabia is very close to allowing its Air Force
to strike targets inside Iran after facing unprecedented
missile and drone attacks on its civilians,
including incoming missiles today targeting Dhamman,
its fifth largest city.
Quote, the next 24 hours is going to be intense, I'm told.
A line has been crossed.
A well-placed official in the Gulf tells me.
What's truly extraordinary, Harris, about this development
is that it would not have been possible
if Israel had not been brought in under U.S. Central Command
at the end of the first Trump administration.
Carrying out airstrikes takes tremendous deconfliction
and coordination.
Senkham used to be attached, or excuse me, Israel
used to be attached to the European command
due to sensitivities with the Arab states
that did not recognize Israel.
That changed with the Abraham Accords.
Folks, regardless of your opinion about the war,
the point Jennifer Griffin just made at the end is critical.
The U.S. Senkham distinction.
I don't have a ton of time to go into it today,
but look it up.
It's not a small thing.
There's a big message being sent there.
This has not worked out in the beginning of the beginning.
The movie's not over.
I understand that at all for the Iranians.
There is no portion of this they are winning.
None.
They're not winning the propaganda war.
Receipts, I showed you the polling.
They're not winning the air war.
We own their skies.
There's not a single Iranian fighter jet
getting off the ground without being blown out of the skies.
Yes, they've had some attacks against our diplomatic facilities
overseas in Saudi, which is only encouraged regional partners
to go in attacking run, not us.
There is nothing about this working out
in their direction at all.
Command, dead, control, gone.
Combs not existed.
Someone said, well, why don't they just do Zoom
after the leadership council was trying to pick a new leader
and then they got on alive too.
Because if they do Zoom, maybe people
kind of use that too.
They have nothing.
Thank you, Samantha Costa.
So happy you're back then.
Everyone buy a rumble style.
Let's give poo to the boot, Samantha Costa.
Thank you, $20 tip.
You don't have to tip the show folks.
I say it all the time.
I really appreciate it.
You guys are nice, but go buy yourself a good cup of coffee
and one of those with a Starbucks has egg white sandwiches
with turkey bacon, I like.
But thank you, Samantha.
That's very nice to you.
We appreciate it.
Thank you guys for highlighting some of the great listeners
in the Bungina Army.
It shows about you guys too.
Folks, here's some video.
We'll just play as voiceover material.
I want you to show again how poorly this is going.
So the Iranians have this problem, right?
They have these ballistic missiles
that they're using as a tactical gun to the head
of regional partners.
You mess with us.
We're going to launch a ballistic missile
and blow up portions of your country.
That's what they're saying.
The problem is we own the skies.
So every time one of these mobile launchers pops up
and launches a missile, the mobile launcher
and the driver, as you can see, are on a live, too.
This is unclassified video from the Department of War.
This did not work in the car.
I love how they play the engine.
Here's another launcher.
That's gone, too.
You basically get one shot at this
and then it's over.
You not only have no more missiles.
You have no more launches.
There's another one.
If you're missing this on Apple and Spotify, watch the video.
There's the mobile one.
Now, let's get away.
We'll drive down this road.
Ah, no more road.
No more launcher.
No more dude driving the car.
Well, maybe it was a woman.
I don't know.
Maybe they have weird pronouns.
G, J, Joe, Joe.
And they're dead.
Here's another one of the airport in Tehran.
You're not going to see a lot of airport.
You're going to see a whole lot of smoke coming from the airport.
As they hit the airport, they now have no airport.
They don't even have the ability to get some jets
or commercial aircraft off the ground
and even resupply.
So it looks like a lot of smoke.
How is this again working out?
I saw that again, an analyst, eh,
I ran into you performing quite well.
Really, bro, where exactly?
Their fire extinguishers aren't even working out well.
Here's another one I just pulled a few minutes ago
in the Indian Ocean.
One of their ships that runs performing really well.
Really, one of their, I guess, frigates
was out there on the Indian Ocean.
They thought, ah, it's safe.
It's the Indian Ocean.
Just a one classified video by the Department of War.
You'll see, oh, look at that shit.
Wow.
Is that the bow with the stern?
That looks like the bow.
Look at the, wow.
Justin's like, is this video from Battleship?
The movie, no, no, this is real.
Oh my god.
Wow, look at that slow mo, what is that?
A water plume coming up.
Yeah, we're going to be able to perform
in quite well.
What a freaking moron.
Yeah, it looks really, they're doing great.
They're doing just great.
You're sitting there in the Indian Ocean.
You want these Iranian, you know,
terrorists, mullah losers sitting there
sunning your nuts on the bow.
And then look at that.
Look at that done then well.
That done then well.
Folks, this war is not going well for Iran.
It is the beginning of the beginning.
Can't say it enough.
It doesn't go well.
There are going to be tragically a very serious note
and already have been death and casualties.
And thank you to these heroes and patriots
for your eternal sacrifice.
But this is not going well for Iran.
And anyone telling you that is absolutely full of shit.
They have no evidence to back that up at all.
Folks, I want you to understand something,
a little bit of a deeper analysis here.
I saw this post yesterday by Joel Berry on X.
And as I'm putting together this show,
I just like to put together people
who have interesting ideas and this was interesting.
And it harkens back, leave this up for a minute, guys.
Back to what I discussed in the opening week of the show,
having been at the principal deputy level,
how everything that gets to that level is a level 10 decision.
He says in this X post,
he says in this X post,
foreign policies, one area where everyone,
no matter how brilliant they are on domestic issues,
seems to have an equal chance of getting it wrong.
Bingo.
He says there were just too many variables we don't know.
But it's astounding how many times Trump is turned out to be right.
Okay.
I need a second on this one.
You can take that down, but I need a second on this one, guys.
I'm going to explain a couple of things.
He is 100% correct.
How is it that so many brilliant PhDs over the years
who've worked in the department of state,
department of defense, department of department of war,
who've worked in international organizations,
done diplomacy, took the FSO test.
So many brilliant people have just made
apocalypticly bad decisions on foreign policy.
It's got to be a reason, right?
I'm going to explain you what it is.
First, everything at that level,
decisions to go to war or not are level 10 decisions.
I can't say it enough.
Level 10 decisions at that level are shitty decisions
and shitty your decisions.
Deciding which one is the shitty your decision
and avoiding it is really hard.
We've talked about that.
Everything at that level,
the Ruby O level, Patel, Ratcliffe, Gabbard,
Bondi, the president, everything's level 10.
At level 10 decision making,
a lot of times your batting average just isn't great,
but no one else has been great either.
Trump is an unusually high batting average
and I'm going to explain to you why.
But I want to just kind of elaborate a second
on what Joel Barry said.
This is really important.
Please don't go anywhere.
The reason foreign policy is so difficult
compared to domestic policy.
Two things I took note on from just my experience over time
is both an activist and then on the inside there.
Number one, you're dealing with human beings.
You just don't know.
So when you're the deputy secretary of state
dealing with a upper level Russian diplomat
on the start treaty or open waters or open skies
or whatever treaty it may be,
you're dealing with someone, you just don't know.
You don't know.
It's not a constituent in your district
that knocks on your door every five minutes
to talk about the fair tax.
You may not want to talk about the fair tax,
but you know what the person's about.
You have a pretty good idea, correct?
When you're dealing with minister Lavrovsky
or whatever it is, you don't know shit about him.
Which segues to point number two,
what you do know about him is probably a lie.
So you're basing your game theory decisions.
If I do this, then he is going to do that
on someone you don't know
who everything he tells you is probably a lie.
What are you saying?
International diplomacy is about lying?
Of course it is.
You think they tell you they're true intentions?
How is it Vladimir Putin to snuck up on the whole world
and invaded Ukraine?
He never told anyone,
hey, I'm gonna invade Ukraine tomorrow at noon.
He didn't announce it and put a neon sign up.
Everything they tell you is a lie.
That's why diplomatic batting averages
on foreign policy are so low.
It's not that PhDs are worthless.
I mean, I think experts expertise is overrated,
but it's not worthless.
You're dealing with variables you can't control.
You don't know people
and what you do know is a freaking lie.
I mean, I sat in probably 20 or 30 meetings
with foreign partners, not bad people.
They're protecting their countries.
Country X just like I am.
You know, many high level meetings
we had about drones and other things,
but I fully understand they're not there
always to tell me the truth.
So why is Trump's batting average so unusually high?
Abraham Accords, move in the embassy, Maduro.
Why everybody, all the experts at World War Three,
all of this stuff is gonna cause regional hostilities
and World War T, but it didn't, but it didn't.
Trump didn't have a PhD.
Here's your answer.
I saw I was watching a clip of Michael Nolz's money
and he hinted at this.
I wrote this yesterday, so only I think I'm stealing his stuff,
but I do like the hat tip.
How Trump deals with people, not institutions,
but this portion I wrote yesterday,
I was gonna take it from a different angle,
but I like his take on it.
Trump is a New York transactional businessman, folks.
He does not give a shit about what prior people did,
what the institutions and white papers say.
He is a New York business guy who I grew up,
when I said I grew up with, I don't mean we were friends,
I mean, when you grew up in New York like I did,
from 1974 to I think 1999 when I left,
most of my adult life was spent in New York City.
I need you to understand, Donald Trump was a fixture,
almost like the de facto mayor of New York for decades.
Everything he did from woman rank to Trump tower
was in the newspaper all the time.
Everything, Donald Trump to build in New York,
which was his business, real estate and construction
and building and managing, he had to deal with really
unsavory people.
He had to deal with some union folks who were not,
some of them were not about, I'm just talking about the workers,
I'm talking about the management.
He had to deal with mob figures who would come in
and try to shake them down.
He had to deal with mayors and their staff who were terrible.
Ed Koch, David Dinkins, I know I grew up with these buffoons
before he had Giuliani in there, thankfully save in the place.
He's dealt with unsavory cats his whole life.
He just has a different antenna for dealing with people
while he disregards institutions that have failed,
had tipped the knolls on that portion of it.
Folks, bookmarked this segment of the show
because when I'm telling you, it's true.
He has an unusually high batting average
because he is really, really good
as simply as stated as this at sniffing out bullshit.
He just reads people better.
Folks, doing business in New York City is just different.
I'm not telling you it's better or worse, I grew up there.
My brother's a local three electrician up there,
my father was a plumber up there, I spent my whole life up there.
Doing business in New York is different.
If you can't handle, at least back in the 80s
before Giuliani cracked it up, unions, bureaucracies,
the mayor, the mob, and everything else,
you better get out of New York.
I never forget the owner of a bagel store
and I lived in middle village telling me
that someone came in and told him,
hey, what kind of, you know, in New York,
these businesses have to have private sanitation.
The city doesn't pick up your garbage.
You have to pay for a private company to do it.
So he told me he's like, yeah, this guy came in last week
and he said, hey, what sanitation are you using?
And he said, whatever, sanitation company, why?
And the guy who was connected mob guy, by the way,
some kind of soldier and a local mob in middle village,
told him, I think you should use our company.
And the guy was like, well, that's really expensive.
And the guy said, yeah, you know what's expensive?
You're place burning down.
I'm not kidding.
I tell you the guy's name and the bagel store,
but I don't want to cause him any problems.
That's what it's like.
That's who Donald Trump had a deal with.
He's just better at this and his track record proves it.
We'll see what happens with this.
But so far, no, the Iranians are not doing well.
That guy's totally full of shit.
I don't know what part of that, where he got that from.
That's just agit prop bullshit.
Folks, the media continues to crash out of course
because the public is on President Trump's side
that the Iranians are an enemy in the polling data
proves it, the Republican party is united over it
and the media crashes out because they hate that
because they along with the CCP and other foreign adversaries
and the Doomer class here wants to divide our movement.
We built it, you and I, and we're not going to let it happen.
Here is the most ridiculous segment of the day.
Here is Chris Hayes at MSNBC, just a moron.
Another one of these white paper-looking writing debags
who knows nothing about nothing.
I'm not sure this guy's ever had a significant job
as an entire life, ridiculously making the comparison
between air power dominance over the death
to America, Mullah class,
trying to build a nuclear weapon to kill people
like Chris Hayes and everyone else,
making a comparison between us being attacked on 9-11
and us attacking someone trying to achieve a nuclear weapon
to kill us using the same ideology used on 9-11.
No, this actually happened.
Check this out.
But outside these borders,
war is having a bomb dropped on your daughter's elementary school
seeing some alert or getting a panic call
or on your apartment building or the hospital
where you are receiving care, death from above.
And when you only view war through our perspective,
the understanding the bombs are never coming for us,
it becomes nothing more than abstraction.
It gets far too easy to wave away the loss of human life.
It's priced in, it's the cost of doing business.
Remember, there was one instance in my lifetime
when we in America experienced death from above.
September 11, 2001, one of the darkest days
I've ever been through that we've all ever been through.
The shared trauma from that one day
caused a decades-long shift in American culture
and foreign policy and American politics
to define multiple generations.
For us, that kind of violence is an anomaly.
It is a once in a lifetime tragedy.
For other people in other countries,
the terror is commonplace.
Because, in part, of the kinds of war of aggression
that Donald Trump just started.
Folks.
All right.
I took a few notes on this yesterday as I watched it.
This is such third grade level at best analysis
of the complexities of war and hostilities.
That, honestly, if you ever took this guy seriously,
which no one in my chat did,
I saw a couple of people in the chat
just fill in this city.
You should now disregard him now
as an unserious person.
Number one, nobody, me, 100% included,
is downplaying the cost in human lives, no one.
However, when you're analyzing war now
or throughout human history,
where Indian tribes have gone to war,
countries have gone to war, nation states have gone to war,
tribes and clans have gone to war.
This has happened throughout human history.
We're not living in some ASAP's fable
or some polyanish world or utopia you dipshit.
We're living in a world full of evil,
full of complicated decision making
where good people have to do sometimes
complicated and difficult things
like choose violence to stop greater violence.
This is such a third grade level analysis.
He absolves himself of asking basic questions
like first, comparing us,
engaging in hostilities in Iran,
and war actions to stop them from potentially creating
a nuclear weapon to destroy us,
comparing that to us being attacked brutally
on 9-11,000s of deaths.
Number one, when you're analyzing violence,
nation state violence, who's doing the killing?
I can tell you who killed us on 9-11,
a bunch of Islamol radical fanatics
who deliberately targeted innocent lives.
The World Trade Center was not a military facility.
Not that that would make it any better,
but who was killing us?
A bunch of radical crazed lunatics.
Who is doing the killing on Aaron?
A trained professional army,
trained to do their best to avoid civilian casualties?
Is that even matter, Chris Hayes?
Are you too stupid to process that?
Number two, who's being targeted?
Does this matter in your work, calculus?
9-11, I can tell you who was being targeted,
a bunch of innocent people who went to work one day,
and thousands of them died.
Some of them fell to their deaths
from hundreds of stories up, burned alive.
Many killed on impact, civilians.
Who's being targeted?
By our military and the IDF over there?
Military targets.
Civilian casualties are secondary and not wanted at all.
And there's at least an attempt to avoid them.
Are you too stupid to process any of this?
And who's being killed?
We have a bunch of Iranian mullahs
declaring death to America
where if this deep egg Chris Hayes
went and tried to record his show over there
and Iran, he'd be flayed and decapitated in 10 minutes.
Those are the people we're killing.
Who were they killing?
I remember the Akile Laro,
where all the planes they've taken down, the IEDs,
the VBIEDs, the Beirut Embassy, the Marine barracks.
I mean, does this idiot not know about 9-11?
I mean, is he serious?
Folks, this stuff is bush-league amateur hour bullshit.
And these people's opinions,
whether it's the other guy,
yeah, Iran's doing quite well.
You're an idiot.
Or this guy, we should compare this to 9-11.
We're doing the same thing.
You're a dipshit.
Your cerebral cognitive network
has about one functioning neuron left.
It's the dumbest thing I've heard all day.
All right, folks, I'm going to take a quick break
and then I've got a guest for you coming up,
my good friend Sean Davis from the Federalist.
We're going to talk about a lot of things here.
We're going to talk obviously about what's going on in Iran.
We're going to talk about CCP influence
and how they're trying to lay down a big schism in our movement.
We're not going to let them.
We're going to talk about the Save Act and the filibuster.
I know Sean's got a different opinion than I do,
but I know he articulates it well.
We're going to talk about that.
And we're going to talk about 2028,
because the Democrat lineup in 2028 looks pretty shitty to me.
But he's talking about the Republican,
schism in the Republican part.
Are you going to run Newsom?
What's he going to run on?
California, the U-Haul rates, Kamala Harris,
are you going to run the Kackler?
Ha, ha, ha.
Good luck.
Folks, when spring rolls around,
I always get the urge to reset everything.
You know, a spring cleaning like everyone else
just get life running a little smoother.
And honestly, the one upgrade that made the biggest difference
wasn't a gadget or some organizing system.
It was the Helix mattress.
I sleep on one of these everywhere.
I go, here's the only problem with the Helix mattress.
When you go travel on the road and you go to a hotel,
I promise you you're going to be like,
anything at home with my Helix mattress.
It's the only downside.
I've had mine for quite a while.
I've been to a couple now.
I had one in DC as well.
It is genuinely transformed my sleep
and a good night's sleep is so restorative
for your mental health, your physical health,
me for this horrendous arthritis of the element.
Before Helix nights were rough,
wake up with a tight back.
I had a mattress before it.
I'm like overheating at any time.
I shift it even a little bit.
Paul had wake up.
What are you doing?
But once I switched to Helix, it was like a night and day.
H-E-L-I-X.
Here's what you do.
Take their sleep quiz so they can customize a mattress to you.
I got paired with the perfect sleep
for how I sleep on a mattress.
And within the first week, I could feel the difference.
My body was more relaxed at night.
Helix, Helix mattresses.
Now I'm waking up refreshed instead of dragging myself
out of bed.
It's wild how much better the entire day feels.
Helix has an exclusive deal right now for my audience.
So go check it out.
Get 27% off side wide.
That's a big savings by going to HelixSleep.com slash Dan.
That's H-E-L-I-X.
Do it today.
Sleep better at night.
Go to HelixSleep.com slash Dan for 27% off side wide.
Make sure you enter our show name and check out
so they know the Dan Bungino show sent you.
Go check it out folks.
Get a good night's sleep.
HelixSleep.com.
Slash Dan.
Welcome to the show today.
For those of you who listen to Dan Bungino show,
you know he's my good friend,
one of the best analysts out there.
A guy really appreciate thefederalist.com.
The website he runs out there to book market.
It's really great for analysis.
My friend Sean Davis.
Sean, thanks for spending some time with us.
We appreciate it.
Thanks for having me back.
Yeah, of course, man.
We had you all the time in the radio show.
You're one of our most popular guests.
The hostilities and the war and I run going on right now.
Obviously we are Republicans.
We're not Democrats.
We're not automatons.
I actually appreciate that there are wide swats of opinion
within the party.
It keeps everybody honest.
However, one of the things I covered earlier in the show
is foreign governments are clearly taking advantage
of the situation.
I played a video earlier in the show.
Some funded protests by liberal groups
that are really trying to take advantage of divisions
within the Republican party.
Divisions great, but I think we can all agree
that this CCP propaganda exercise, you know,
this is kind of out of bounds.
Yeah, and I don't think it's just the CCP.
I mean, you see all these accounts in Europe
and in Asia, post an AI slop fake videos of...
Right.
I saw one this morning which had huge traction
of allegedly I ran sinking the US Navy.
Like it's so absurd, it's so obviously fake.
And yet you have these scores and scores of obviously
foreign accounts posting things that are obviously fake.
It is a problem and it's been a problem we've had
for a long time, which is foreign governments
who hate us posting nonsense and trying to divide us
by posting lies and getting us to buy into them.
And one of the reasons I mean,
it's obvious why I'm concerned about foreign influence
in our politics and we're rules against that.
You have fairer and other things.
You know, you're allowed to have an opinion.
You're actually legally, of course, allowed to lobby
on behalf of foreign government.
It's a republic.
You're just not allowed to do it without registering
if you're doing that.
You just have to tell every woman
and a lot of that is not happening
and the democratization of information on social media
has made it really easy to put agit prop out there.
One of the things that concerns me though,
specifically about China is this attack on Iran
where we've really kind of decapitated their leadership.
And now we've kind of iced out China's
and one of their energy suppliers, them in Venezuela.
This is kind of a proxy fight too.
China obviously has goals, someone say by 2027
to jump the street and take over Taiwan.
I think this is going to make them
hopefully think twice about that
because to power a war machine, as you know, Sean,
you need power.
And now outside of Russia and some small deposits
they have with other countries,
they're really gonna have an issue
getting their energy supplies to do that.
And I'm sure that factored in to the president's analysis
on when and how to decapitate this regime.
Yeah, I think I've read that China gets something
like 15 to 20% of its oil combined
from Venezuela and Iran.
So it's not all of it, but it's also not nothing.
That's a really big chunk.
Now the question is, are they able to just go
on the open market and buy it?
Are they gonna be able to get it from Russia?
Does Russia have the type of crude that they need?
In China because obviously there's different types of oil
that can create challenges in refining.
And you nailed it.
You said a country has to have energy
to power its war machine.
It also needs money.
And one thing we've not done a good job
in the US of doing is starving China of that money.
And over the last, I'd say 50 years,
we've actually been the number one funder
of that war machine.
They have built their war machine
with American dollars sent to them
through offshoreing and outsourcing
by cheap Chinese crap.
I really, really wish the politicians in our country
were serious about tackling China
and more than just a military means.
You have to cut off the thing that's making them
that behemoth they are,
which is international trade and American trade.
And so I think we need a multifaceted effort.
You can't just be going after the energy.
You have to do all of the above.
And I think Trump has done a wonderful job of that.
I think that's a major reason he's had a lot of his terrorists.
Unfortunately, we have a Congress
that doesn't seem to be interested in doing much of anything
other than just sitting back and watching
and hoping for the best.
You know, Sean, I'm glad you brought that up.
It wasn't one of my intended questions,
but me being a conservatorian,
especially on the economic front,
obviously I'm a believer in free and fair trade.
The problem we've had with China
is you can throw that model out the window
because one, the trade isn't fair.
They steal our IP or intellectual property
all the time.
So I think fair about that.
But second, whether it's the WTO
or their entrance into a very specific trade agreements
and world trade in general,
they've used that to create a war machine
specifically targeted at one taking over Taiwan
and potentially starting a real World War III.
That's what really concerns me
is if you don't take that national security component
into the trade situation,
especially with regards to quantum computing and AI,
you can talk all the stuff you want about.
Oh, great, you know, free and fair trade, whatever.
You're not gonna sell swords to your enemy
in a common seizure castle,
and essentially that's what we're doing.
Yeah, and not only that,
not only have we been selling them the things they need
and giving them maybe not intentionally,
they steal it, the technology they need,
we've been giving them all this money.
And even worse, we're dependent on them for things.
We're dependent upon India for a lot of pharmaceuticals.
We're dependent upon Russia and Ukraine
for a lot of fertilizer and farm goods.
You can't have national security
if you're not able to manufacture your own food,
your own medicine, your own weapons, your own vehicles
in your own country.
And it's a thing that's just driven me absolutely insane.
It is so obvious that if everyone else controls
your ability to make something,
then those countries control you completely.
And the sooner we become an independent country again,
the sooner we make things in America again,
the sooner we'll be able to actually confront
with strength, the threat that China poses to the world.
That's a great analysis.
I mean, when you start discussing things like antibiotics,
an ability to at least make steel.
We don't have to be the world leader in steel,
but an ability to make kind of important in combat.
We have to look at it different in this now polarized world.
And that's why I think President Trump's focus
on what they've kind of jokingly called the Don Roe doctrine.
I think it's smart.
If we can't even dominate our own hemisphere,
we have no chance of taking on Russia, China,
and formally the leadership of Iran.
Sean, I'd be remiss.
You worked up in the Senate.
You understand the mechanics better than anyone.
The SAV Act and the filibuster,
the SAV Act, which would institute voter integrity measures
across the country.
And I'm not going to say prevent cheating,
but obviously dramatically reduce it.
Critically important, we can't seem to get passed
this 60 vote hurdle in the Senate known as the filibuster
and then cloture votes.
The Democrats have already said multiple times.
They're going to scrap the filibuster.
Again, I understand there are differences of opinion.
I've said, I think we scrap it before them.
I know you're opinion on it
and others I've had on the shows a little bit different,
but I want the audience to hear both sides of it.
Your thoughts on first the SAV Act
and then dumping the filibuster to get it passed
or dumping the filibuster in general.
Yeah, so the SAV Act, the SAV America Act,
whichever version you're looking at,
is essential.
You really can't have homeland security
without election security.
And right now, Democrats are being able to block it,
not by filibustering, but by doing nothing.
And there's this culture of laziness in the Senate
where you have cloture to end debate.
The problem is debate never actually begin
because the Senate allows itself to operate on
what my friends and I called the zombie filibuster.
All the Democrat has to do is pick up the phone
and call the cloakroom and say,
hey, I want you to put a hold on this
and they say, oh, okay.
And then the Senate, the Republicans will look at the numbers
and say, oh, well, some Democrats want to filibuster this.
So I guess that's it.
We're not going to do anything.
And that's not the traditional practice of the Senate.
And there actually is a means by which
you can break this 60 threshold
and preserve the filibuster at the same time.
And the way you do this is by forcing Democrats
to come down, control the floor,
and actually speak on and on and on.
And you can actually exhaust their filibuster
because under Senate rules,
a senator can only give two speeches
in one legislative day and in the Senate
when you're debating a bill,
you can keep it in the legislative day.
So you can actually force them to come down
once they've each made their two speeches.
They probably don't even come close to that.
Debate just naturally ends.
I liken it to waking up from a nap.
When you wake up from the nap, the nap is just over.
You don't have to do something proactive to end it.
And with this procedure called a talking filibuster,
you make them filibuster and you make them exhaust it
until the process naturally ends.
And when it ends, you have a vote on the merits.
And that's a majority vote.
And so one reason I actually support
keeping the filibuster right now
is if you can change the culture of the Senate
to actually make people have to talk,
you can preserve that bit of obstruction
that you might want to have to make it hard on them
without eliminating it entirely.
And I understand that people say,
oh, Democrats will just change it when they get in.
They might if they have the votes.
They didn't previously have the votes,
even though they had a majority.
And I would rather raise the possibility
of keeping it to above zero
than just getting rid of it entirely
in an environment where Republicans
don't even want to do anything anyway.
I'm not sure there's 51 votes for much of anything
if we were to nuke it overnight.
And I would hate to make it so easy for Democrats
that they can just waltz in
instead of actually having to work to get rid of it.
Yeah, I understand and I respect a lot of opinions
on Brandon Gill, great congressman from Texas
has a similar approach.
Mike Lee has led down that pathway
to Hugh Hewits wrote some interesting op-eds on this.
The only issue I would have with that
and everything you said by the way
is absolutely accurate.
Given the perfect world,
you definitely want the Senate
to be a cooling chamber against big government
because the Democrats are better.
They're just better at big government than others.
Just be honest.
We haven't been great on it either,
but they'll spend anything all the time.
Is cinema and mansion, the two senators,
I don't know, you know this,
who were against it and stopped it,
you know, are no longer there.
Now, I see I think we're going
and tell me if I'm right or wrong.
I think what you're saying is I think they kind of always knew
cinema and mansion would be against it.
So what some of them can comfortably vote to scrap it.
But now without them there,
are you hinting that they may be uncomfortable now
that they know their votes would matter
to these Democrats that they may air towards
a talking filibuster rather than scrapping it?
I think so.
I mean, I look at Federman.
I'm not sure Federman is a guaranteed vote
to kill the filibuster.
And given that JD Bansis will still be vice president,
Republicans will still hold.
Democrats don't need 50.
They technically need 51.
They may need 52 or 53,
depending on someone who kind of gets gold feet
when nuking the filibuster gets real.
And if we go ahead and nuke it now
and they only end up with say 50 or 51 votes,
they may not have had the ability to nuke it.
And instead we went and did their hard work for them.
And again, it comes from,
I just don't trust Senate Republicans to do anything.
If you put the save act on the floor right now,
I'm not sure there actually would be 50 votes for it.
I think that's why they're doing this hamming and hawing
and trying to rig it against it
is that John Thune doesn't want to put people
like Lisa Murkowski or Susan Collins on the hot seat
and watch them vote against it.
So I think there's a lot of dishonesty
coming from Senate Republicans.
I just don't want to do the easy work for Democrats
so they don't have to pay any penalty
for what they're wanting to do.
I think we should make it very, very hard for them to do that,
especially if as I believe,
they don't actually have the votes for it.
Yeah, we're talking to Sean Davis, S-E-A-N,
looking up on social media, runs the Federalist.
It's the Federalist.com.
Always a great guest with the behind the scenes.
Sean, you said something,
my radio show a couple of years ago
and my audience still remembers it to this day.
It was probably one of the,
but one of your, you've had a lot of profound insights,
but this is one of your best.
You said, Dan,
people don't win elections, ballots win elections.
And those aren't always the same thing.
That is why I just going back to the save act for a moment.
Given this mass ballot harvesting, which we know is a scam,
combine it with mass mail in balloting,
whether you just get a ballot,
whether you requested or not
in a state like California or elsewhere,
you know as well as I do.
You've got some poor 80 year old grandma,
didn't request the ballot at all.
At the later stages of our life,
they've got all kinds of things going on the grand,
because a ballot goes to some mail room.
It's intercepted.
Someone signs it, brings it back
and some harvesting thing.
If she doesn't complain and doesn't check her vote status
that somebody voted for, you have no idea.
The scale of the fraud is,
I mean, when I say this,
I mean, in the literal sense,
could be immeasurable.
We've got to get a hold of this with the save act,
or like you said,
you're not going to have a republic
if there's no fidelity to the mechanisms,
how we get to a representative democracy in the first place.
Yeah, and there's a reason Democrats oppose it.
There is a reason they oppose voter ID.
There's a reason they oppose required vote in person.
And it's because all these things make it easy for them to cheat.
We all know why they're doing it.
It's why they were so adamant during COVID.
We got to lock everyone down,
force people at home,
because then that gives us the pretext
we need to do universal mail and balding,
which they can then take over,
harvest bazillions of votes.
Their states refuse to do signature matching
or anything like that.
They oppose these things
because they need this stuff in place so they can cheat.
And it just boggles my mind
to watch Republicans in the Senate,
particularly just sit back and be like,
well, yeah, that's fine.
We'll let them do that.
You can't have a free country
if you don't have secure elections.
Right.
And I said over and over.
I don't want cheating that benefits
the Republican party either.
I think that's fairly obvious.
If no one is faith in the elections,
you're not going to have a republic.
You're just not.
And no one's going to believe it
and you're going to have anarchy.
Speaking of elections,
midterm analysis in 2028,
I'll kind of bundle it into one.
You know, there's all kinds of,
I never get into kind of red wave or blue wave stuff.
I did not,
as a matter of fact,
it was a joke on my show
when everyone was predicting a huge red wave last time.
I don't want to hear it.
There's no benefit to our party
and talking about that.
If you really believe
we're going to win in some kind of red wave,
you're not going to show up.
I like to just say,
hey, just show up and do your thing.
Forget it.
But analysis does matter.
Obviously, they've had some successes
in special elections.
Off years, you had Virginia, New Jersey,
Gubernatorials.
We did not fare very well
when Donald Trump isn't on the ballot.
There, you know,
there seems to be some down ballot issues.
Your thoughts on the midterms,
that end just,
secondly, on 2028,
the Democrats I think are in a lot of trouble too.
I mean, we have a really solid venture.
People you've got both JD and Marco Rubio.
They've got Gavin Newsom and Kamala.
I mean, you're really going to run on California
and then Kamala Harris again.
Unless they get some,
you know, someone out of the bullpen
coming out to like enter Sandman
or something like Mariano Rivera.
I don't see,
I don't see 2028 looking glorious for them either.
Yeah, you got to run like your 10 points
behind regardless of what the polls say.
If you run like your hairs on fire,
which for me is tricky now,
because I don't have much left,
you're going to do much better.
But when I'm kind of looking at what the map looks like,
what the messages are,
I'm very worried about Republicans
because it's Donald Trump's not on the ballot.
He's not going to save you, John Thune.
He's not going to save you, Mike Johnson.
There are people who will come out to vote
only when Donald Trump is on the ballot on the right.
And the struggle we have is that Democrats are jacked up
because they hate Trump.
They hate Republicans.
They enjoy watching their opponents get murdered
and shot at.
They're jacked up for this.
They've got all the enthusiasm.
But when you look at the right,
you have to ask yourself,
what have congressional Republicans done
to give Republican base a reason to come out
and vote for them?
Beyond, oh, look, I'm just not a Democrat.
What have they accomplished?
What is their message?
I can't tell you right now.
And I do this for a living.
What the congressional Republican message is
for the midterms,
they seem completely adrift,
completely lazy.
They're not focused on anything.
Luckily, in politics,
eight, nine months is an eternity.
So they have more than enough time to turn around.
But if they don't stop steering that ship
or start steering that ship
in a different direction soon,
I think they're in for a world of hurt
because you have to give people a reason to vote for you.
You can't just go out and say,
I'm not the other guy.
Talking to Sean Davis from the Federalist,
if you're listening to an Apple or Spotify.
Sean, last question,
I always appreciate your time in your analysis.
Ruben Gallego Arizona Senator has already stated
to believe to Semaphore with the two corporations
and not a failed threat, just an overt threat.
Hey, corporations,
like we're coming for you
if we win back the house.
I mean, the weaponization of the government
that took 20 years,
you know, we had the,
obviously my experience,
we had the Ray, you know,
Komi, even Muller-era's,
the weaponization of the government
I saw it from behind the scenes,
but it's not just FBI,
it's the use of intelligence assets, CIA,
DNI, bureaucracies, the FCC,
the FEC, the SEC,
the Labor Relations Board.
I mean, you follow this as well as I thank God Trump
just cleaned that up.
I saw an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal last night.
But the weaponization of government took a long time.
I'm very concerned that the cleanup process,
what I'm getting at,
sort of a long-winded question.
But the cleanup process is not going to take a year
or two years.
It's not.
It deep-state embeds don't just announce themselves.
They hide and they waste.
It's going to take four to eight years.
And I'm not telling you to trust the plan,
I don't think I don't get it then ESO.
It's just obvious it took 20 years to do
that it's going to take a long time.
We lose these midterms.
We're in the world of trouble.
The Democrats ain't kidding around.
No, they're not.
I saw people after the 2024 election
go out and beat their chest and say,
woke is dead, woke is dead.
No, it's not.
Woke is waiting.
Okay, these people are not dead.
They're not gone.
They are plotting, they're waiting.
And when they come back, they are going to be
even more vicious than they were before.
Because losing didn't get them to take a measured look
at themselves and say, we should be better.
No, no, no.
They're looking at it and saying,
we had the opportunity to crush them
and we didn't take it.
So we need to destroy them.
We need to wipe them out.
That's why we saw so many people on the left cheer
when Charlie was assassinated.
It's why we saw people on the left say,
oh man, I wish that guy didn't miss in Butler.
Okay, these people are hell bent on taking power
and crushing us, not just winning politically.
They want to destroy us.
They're coming after us.
They came after you.
They came after me.
I'm still suing the State Department
over what they tried to do to my business
with their censorship and their law fair.
And these people are never going to stop.
So I look at this and for us,
you know, it's a cliche that the next election's
the most important one.
It really is true though.
This is existential for us.
They are going to come after us
and they're going to destroy us
and they're going to laugh at us the whole way.
If we don't win and stamp out this nonsense once and for all.
Man, you've got some great one liners.
You're up there with Kennedy from Louisiana.
Ballots win elections on people.
Woke is waiting.
I'm going to write that down.
We get off the air to not distract the audience.
But I will footnote it to you, of course,
but you're correct.
Woke is not even close to dead.
It's just sitting there waiting.
You're absolutely right.
Sean Davis is now the Federalist.com is the website
SEAN.
Look him up on social media.
Follow him for just a really great analysis.
He's always been a great friend to the movement
and to me, Sean.
I really appreciate it.
You're welcome back anytime.
Thanks for coming out today.
Thank you, sir.
So glad to have you back too.
Thank you, buddy.
Sean Davis, folks, the Federalist.
Check him out.
We try to bring you the best guest set.
I really appreciate it.
I hope you're enjoying the guest segment.
I hope you're enjoying the show, folks.
We added 10,000 more followers on rumble.
Thank you so much.
I really appreciate it.
It is free.
It is free to do it.
I showed a nice woman in a restaurant
last week how to do it.
You go to, if you want to watch on the web, rumble.com slash
Bon Gino, B-O-N-G-I-N-O, just type it in, hit go.
And you'll see that follow button.
Click follow if you would.
You'll get a notification for our show
goes live every day exclusively here.
10 a.m. Eastern time.
The Dan Bon Gino show rumble.com slash Bon Gino.
We are going to raid the Stephen Crowder show.
Afterwards, you can follow Stephen Crowder here as well.
It's too, he has an excellent show
when the top live streamers in the world.
And then of course, you have Haley coming up
at noon rumble.com slash Haley.
And then at 8 a.m. every day,
you have the great Vince colonnase rumble.com slash Vince.
You can also check them out at Bon Gino report on rumble.
Thank you, folks, so much.
We're crossing now.
We just passed 25 million views since we've been back
despite the doomers and everyone else
predicting otherwise.
The Bon Gino army is as strong as ever.
I can't tell you how much I appreciated.
I owe it all to you.
Follow us on Apple and Spotify as well.
You can get the audio version only of the show there.
rumble.com slash Bon Gino.
See you back here tomorrow at 10 a.m.
Hey there, I'm Vince.
I'm Haley Karenia, host of Vince.
Host of Scrolling of Haley.
You can always catch my show right here
right here on the Bon Gino report channel live.
8 a.m. Eastern weekday mornings noon, weekdays.
And if you miss it, no worries.
The show will always be right here
at anywhere you find the podcasts.
Thanks for watching.
The Dan Bongino Show



