Mega Edition: Ashley Parham Amends Her Lawsuit To Include More Defendants (Part 1-2)(3/6/26)

Well, some fools, men of the J.U.

So here from the WWE.

When it's just me between matches, it's day one itch.

And that means it's Chumba time.

With hundreds of Casino style games

and new titles arriving weekly,

there's always something fresh to try at Chumba Casino.

The daily booze make it even more fun.

And have me, bout to get them all during my downtime.

Ready for a fun way to chill out

and enjoy a few minutes for yourself?

Let's Chumba.

No purchase necessary.

VGW Group Void were prohibited by law, CTs and Cs.

21 Plus sponsored by Chumba Casino.

What's up everyone and welcome back to another episode

of the Ditty Diaries.

Ashley Parham has filed an amended complaint against Ditty

and she has named some pretty interesting co-defendants.

And those co-defendants are

Christina Quorum, Shane Pierce,

Ruben Valdez, John Pellate, O'Dell Beckham Jr.,

Drew Desbordes, AKA Drew Ski,

Jacqueline Wright, AKA Jaguar Wright,

Helena Harris Scott, Matthias Gonzalez,

Brandy Cunningham, Janice Combs, Keith Lux,

AKA Big Homey C.C.

And John and Jane Doe's one through 10.

So let's dive into this document

and see what Ashley Parham's talking about.

Case number three-24-cv-07191-RFL.

Amended complaint.

Demand for a jury trial.

Introduction.

This case involves Rico Enterprise

for the purpose of sexual assault,

battery, rape, sexual abuse, false imprisonment

and kidnapping for the personal and financial benefit

to the Enterprise participants.

Defendant Ditty has been sued by countless individuals

for crime similar to the ones enumerated in this complaint.

Defendant Ditty is currently a federal inmate

awaiting criminal trial for crimes similar to the ones

enumerated in this complaint.

Defendant KK is an employee of Defendant Ditty,

often referred to by Defendant Ditty as his right-hand woman.

Defendant Ditty's predatory behavior was constant

and well-known by several individuals,

including Defendant Ditty's employees, staff, friends, family

and associates.

In fact, Defendant Ditty's sons are being sued

for engaging in the same type of deviant behavior

as their father has pled in a Los Angeles Superior Court

filing.

Defendant Ditty was able to effectuate his crimes

and evade capture and prosecution for his crimes

for almost 30 years due to his position of power

and influence in the entertainment industry.

Defendant Ditty exploited his position

and his relationship with powerful individuals

to force sexual acts through exploitation,

fear, manipulation, physical threats,

emotional abuse, intimidation and retaliation.

Had any of the previous victims of Defendant Ditty

been taking seriously or had any of the better as reported,

Defendant Ditty's actions, a law enforcement,

Defendant Ditty's illegal and unfathomable behavior

could have been prevented.

Instead, Defendant Ditty was able to rein his abuse

and terrorism on countless victims for over 30 years.

Additionally, had Defendant Ditty's numerous business partners

and associates not ignored Defendant Ditty's deviant behavior,

Defendant Ditty would have been unable to continue

his pattern of abuse over such a long period of time.

As alleged herein, Defendant Ditty abused his position

of power in the entertainment industry

to garner loyalty and trust from the public at large

and law enforcement while instilling fear and intimidation

in the hearts of his voluminous victims.

Alligations against Defendant Ditty

have been disregarded for decades,

therefore creating a failure to protect victims

like the plaintiff's name herein.

Unlike most victims of Defendant Ditty

who were employees, sex workers,

or individuals seeking out Defendant's help

to launch their careers,

Plaintiff Parham does not fall into any of those categories.

Plaintiff Parham met Defendant Ditty due to happenstance

and still ended up being brutally victimized

in a similar manner as described by the others

who have preceded her filing and others

who surely will follow including Plaintiff those herein.

Plaintiff John and Jane Doe met with Defendant Ditty

through their connections in the music industry

as Plaintiff John Doe was a previous

plaintiff against Michael Jackson

for a sexual assault as a minor.

Due to Defendant's agreements

to participate in a corrupt enterprise, Plaintiff,

and countless other victims have been immeasurably

and permanently harmed.

Plaintiff alleged as follow upon personal knowledge

as to themselves and their acts and experience

and as to all other matters upon information

and belief including investigations conducted

by their attorneys.

Parties.

Plaintiff Ashley Parham is an individual

who resides in and domiciled in California.

Plaintiff John Doe is an individual

who is domiciled in Nevada

and resides in another state purposefully

to protect his safety and identity.

Plaintiff Jane Doe is an individual

who is domiciled in Nevada

and resides in another state purposefully

to protect her safety and identity.

Defendant Combs is an individual

who resides in and is domiciled in California.

Defendant also owns a residence in Florida.

However, Defendant Diddy is currently

an inmate at MDC in Brooklyn, New York.

Defendant Cristiano Chorum, Defendant KK

is an individual who, upon information and belief,

resides in and is domiciled in either California

or North Carolina.

Defendant Shane Pierce, Defendant Shane

is an individual who resides in

and is domiciled in California.

Defendant Rubin Lyra Valdez, Defendant Valdez,

is an individual who resides

and is domiciled in California.

Defendant John Lawrence Pellate

is an individual who resides in

and is domiciled in Nevada or Hawaii.

Defendant O'Dell Beckham, Jr.

Defendant O'Dell is an individual

who resides and is domiciled in Florida.

Previously referred to as John Doe

and Plaintiff Parham's original complaint.

Defendant Drew Disbordis, Defendant Drew Ski,

is an individual who, upon information and belief,

resides in and is domiciled in either Maryland or Georgia,

previously referred to as John Doe

and Plaintiff Parham's original complaint.

Defendant Jacqueline Wright, Jaguyer,

is an individual who, upon information and belief,

resides in and is domiciled in California or Nevada.

Defendant Helena Harris Scott, Defendant Helena,

is an individual who, upon information and belief,

resides in and is domiciled in California.

Defendant Matthias Golden Gonzales, Defendant Gonzales,

is an individual who, upon information and belief,

resides in and is domiciled in Nevada.

Defendant Brandi Klonenger, Cunningham,

Defendant Brandi is an individual

who, upon information and belief,

resides in is domiciled in Arkansas,

previously referred to as Jane Doe

and Plaintiff Parham's original complaint.

Defendant Janice Combs, is an individual who resides

and is domiciled in Florida, Defendant Keith Lux,

Defendant Big Home ECC, is an individual

who, upon information and belief, resides

and is domiciled in Nevada.

Defendant John and Jane Doe's one through 10,

Defendant Doe's one through 10,

are individuals who, upon information and belief,

reside in and are domiciled in various states,

but mainly California.

Jurisdiction, venue, timeliness, and California's

sexual abuse and cover-up accountability act.

This court has federal question,

jurisdiction under 28 code, section 1331,

and supplemental jurisdiction under US code 28,

section 1367.

For the state law claims alleged,

this court has personal jurisdiction,

overall defendants, because they have purposefully

availed themselves, are residents of the state,

and or were conducting business in California,

in this lawsuit arise, out of the acts

that occurred in California,

and relates to their contracts and contracts in California.

Further, the pervasive culture of abuse,

including sexual assault, rape, inappropriate touching,

and wielding power and control over plaintiffs,

were a constant presence when defendant Didi,

and the other herein named defendants,

engaged in the acts described herein.

The location of all relevant events herein alleged,

occurred within the jurisdiction of California.

Plaintiffs were harmed and injured in California

by defendants.

Venue is proper in this judicial district

under US code 28, section 1391, B and C.

Further, venue is proper in this judicial district,

pursuant to US code 18, section 1965.

This action is timely under federal racketeering

influenced and corrupt organizations act,

US code 18, section 1961,

as the Didi sexual abuse and cover-up enterprise,

fraudulently concealed the ongoing sexual

and deceitful activity,

towards inconspiracy taking place within Didi sexual abuse

and cover-up enterprise.

This action is also timely under California's sexual

abuse and cover-up accountability act,

California's sexual abuse and cover-up accountability act,

AB 2777, amended California Civil Procedure

section 340.16, extending the statute of limitations,

opening up revival window for adult survivors

of sexual assault and related claims and acknowledging

that a two-year statute of limitations

simply does not provide sexual assault survivors

adequate time to heal from the physical

and emotional trauma of sexual assault

and prepare for a civil case.

California Bill Analysis,

AB 2777, 614, 2022.

When the perpetrator is someone of victim trust,

it can take years for the victim

even to identify what happened to them as sexual assault.

For these reasons, it's self-evident

that the unique nature of the emotional

and psychological consequences of sexual assault,

especially on women,

can paradoxically permit wrongdoers to escape civil

accountability unless statutes of limitation

are crafted to prevent this injustice from occurring.

Moreover, when these data are combined

with widespread news reports of major companies

being accused of covering up sexual assaults

by their employees,

it's self-evident that statutes of limitation

for sexual assault need to be crafted

in a way that does not cause the covering up company

to enjoy the fruits of their cover-up solely

because our statutes of limitation permit

and thus motivate such behavior.

Well, so, foos, men of the J.O. sole here from the WWE.

When it's just me between matches, it's day one itch.

That means it's chumba time.

With hundreds of casino-style games

and new titles arriving weekly,

there's always something fresh to try at chumba casino.

The daily booze may get even more fun

and have me about to get them all during my downtime.

Ready for a fun way to chill out

and enjoy a few minutes for yourself?

Let's chum.

No purchase necessary.

VGW Group voidware prohibited by law,

CTs and Cs, 21 plus sponsored by chumba casino.

Defendants fraudulent concealment

through active attempts to cover up

caused an ongoing trauma to plaintiff

and caused her to suffer.

Plaintiff Parham has repressed her experience

until recently when defendant Diddy was accused

by his ex-girlfriend, former employee Cassie Ventura

and others regarding their experiences with defendant Diddy.

Accessing the civil justice system

allows victims, survivors and opportunity

to seek accountability for the years of suffering,

caused by the abuse they experienced

and a chance to take back the power they lost

as a result of the sexual assault.

Plaintiff's John and Jane Doe

have been paralyzed in fear,

have had to change their names

and frequently move from their residences

for fear of being kidnapped,

raped and abused and assaulted by defendant herein.

Plaintiff Doe's hereby invoke the pseudonym

to protect their lives

from the long reach of the Diddy sexual abuse

and cover up enterprise.

Additionally, any statute of limitations

applicable to the blow claims, if any,

is told and defendants are e-stopped

from raising such a defense

as their actions describe below,

to pry of plaintiff of the opportunity

to commence this lawsuit before now

as well as other equitable and legal bases.

All right, we're going to wrap up part one right here

and in the next episode,

we're going to pick up with factual allegations,

comments, all counts.

If you'd like to contact me,

you can do that at Bobbi Kupuchi at protonmail.com.

That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at protonmail.com.

Or if you prefer, you can find me on X

at B-O-B-B-Y underscore C-A-P-U-C-C-I.

All of the links that we discussed

can be found in the description box.

What's up everyone and welcome

to another episode of the Diddy Diaries.

In this episode, we're going to pick up

where we left off with the Ashley Parum

amended complaint filed against Diddy

that added a whole bunch of people

including Odell Beckham and Jaguar Wright and Druski.

Factual allegations, comment, all counts, plaintiff Parum.

Plaintiff met defendant Shane in February 2018

after an altercation with another man at a bar

and defendant Shane came to plaintiff's rescue.

While outside the bar with friends and other patrons,

defendant Shane FaceTime video call Defendant Diddy

and was showing people Defendant Diddy

in the video on his phone,

attempting to impress people with his famous friend.

Defendant Shane then showed plaintiff

Defendant Diddy on his video call,

which plaintiff ignored, stating she was not impressed by him,

knowing Defendant Diddy because she believed Defendant Diddy

had something to do with the murder of rapper Tupac Shakur.

Visible in the FaceTime call was Defendant Diddy

and some of his children, including his sons,

Christian and Quincy.

It appeared from plaintiff's perspective,

Defendant Diddy was having a get together at his home

during the time of the FaceTime call with Defendant Shane.

Defendant Diddy heard plaintiff statement

and made a remark that plaintiff would pay for his statements

regarding Tupac and overall dismissal of Defendant Diddy.

On March 23, 2018, Defendant Shane invited plaintiff

over to his home to assist him with his cancer medications

because he stated he was weak

and unable to open his medication.

Upon plaintiff's arrival, Defendant Shane informed plaintiff

that he wanted to give her a ride in his new car.

Plaintiff and Defendant Shane left his residence

for a brief period and then returned.

Once they returned, Defendant Shane left the door

to his apartment partially open and stated that the door was a jar

because there was an issue with the door

where it wouldn't close completely.

Defendant Shane was renting an apartment

on the lower floor of a home in Orinda, California.

Defendant Shane had a separate entrance into his residence

that led to the backyard of the home.

The home also had a main entrance on Loma Vista Drive.

Defendant Shane rented the home from a woman

who lived in the upstairs portion of the home

and had two dogs who resided with her.

Plaintiff and Defendant Shane then began to watch a movie

and Defendant Shane offered her a glass of water

which he retrieved and brought back to plaintiff.

All approximately 10 minutes after plaintiff and Defendant Shane

returned from their drive,

Defendant Diddy entered Defendant Shane's residence.

Defendant Diddy entered the home in a grand,

ready-to-party manner.

His grandiose entrance was so loud

that the dogs upstairs began barking.

Defendant Diddy did not enter the home

through the backyard entrance,

but instead through the main entrance.

Along with Defendant Diddy were his bodyguard,

Defendant Big Home ECC, Defendant KK, Defendant Brandy,

Defendant Do2, who upon information and belief

is a friend of Defendant Shane and Diddy

and Defendant Diddy's driver, Do3,

who remained outside in his vehicle

during the duration of plaintiff's assault.

Plaintiff believed Defendant Shane invited her over

to set her up to be assaulted by Defendant Diddy

because of the statement she made

about Defendant Diddy among prior.

Upon Defendant Diddy's arrival,

he immediately began to antagonize the plaintiff,

stating that she thought that she would never see him in person,

pay for her statements about two-pock

during the video call and Defendant Diddy caught plaintiff.

Plaintiff was in shock as she never believed

that she would ever see her meet Defendant Diddy in real life,

let alone in the small apartment rented by Defendant Shane.

Defendant Diddy began advancing towards

where a plaintiff was sitting on Defendant Shane's bed

with a knife and held it to the right side of plaintiff's face

and threatened to give her a glass-gall smile

and retaliation for her previous statements on the video call.

Defendant KK told Defendant Diddy

that she did not think giving plaintiff a glass-gall smile

would be advantageous to their potential clients

who they could sell plaintiff for sex too.

Defendant KK then made a threat to plaintiff

that they could chipper off anywhere in the world

and that she would never see her family

or anyone she knew ever again.

Defendant Shane then partially on dress plaintiff

then Defendant Diddy removed the remainder of plaintiff's clothing,

removing the knife from her face

and then retrieved a bottle of liquid from a large fanny pack.

Defendant Diddy then squirted a bottle of liquid on plaintiff,

which placed her in fear that she was being squirted

with a chemical substance like acid.

Plaintiff soon realized the substance was an oil or lubricant,

plaintiff was squirted and this liquid substance

all over the entirety of her naked body.

Defendant KK then told by Defendant Diddy

to insert what looked like a syringe

from sterile packaging into plaintiff's vagina.

Defendant KK did his told while assisted by Defendant Brandy

and then told Defendant Diddy

that they were unable to use the IUD

because it had prematurely been released from its packaging.

Defendant Diddy upset by this took the syringe from Defendant KK

and tried inserting it in plaintiff's vagina instead.

Defendant KK and Diddy began to argue as Defendant KK

continued to advise Defendant Diddy

that since the IUD had been prematurely released

from its packaging, it was no way they could insert it

into plaintiff's vagina effectively.

After some time Defendant Diddy heated the advice

of Defendant KK and removed the syringe from plaintiff's vagina

and handed it to Defendant KK.

Defendant KK and Defendant Brandy

then exited Defendant Shane's residence,

leaving plaintiff alone with Defendant Diddy, Shane,

and John Doe's who had been named herein.

Defendant Diddy then picked up a television remote

that was near plaintiff and violently inserted it

into plaintiff's vagina.

Defendant Diddy while violently raping plaintiff

with a television remote told plaintiff that her life

was in his hands and that he wanted he could take her

and she would never be seen again.

Plaintiff began hysterically crying

from the threats by Defendant Diddy

along with the plan of being violently vaginally raped

by Defendant Diddy with the television remote

as well as the lingering pain from the ordeal

with the IUD's syringe insertion.

Defendant Diddy then instructed Defendant Shane

to turn plaintiff on her stomach,

seemingly tired of hearing the plaintiffs

blood-curdling screams.

Defendant Shane then grabbed plaintiff

by her abdomen and hips, turned plaintiff on her stomach.

Defendant Diddy then inserted Defendant Shane

to put a pillow over her head because he didn't

want to see her face or hear her cries

and instructed Defendant Shane to anally rape plaintiff.

Defendant Shane did as he was told by Defendant Diddy

and began to anally rape plaintiff,

Defendant Diddy then violently rape plaintiff

anally after Defendant Shane.

Defendant Doe too then joined Defendant Diddy and Shane

taking turns anally raping plaintiff.

Immediately after Defendant Doe to rape plaintiff,

he exited Defendant Shane's residence.

Defendant Diddy then instructed another Defendant Doe

to also rape plaintiff.

Defendant Doe has been determined

to be Defendant Druski.

Wow.

That's some pretty powerful shit right there, huh?

And Mr. Druski running around on the internet

like some big shot.

Now he's gonna have to answer for this shit.

Instead of immediately raping plaintiff,

Defendant Druski doused plaintiff with more oil lubricant

and then jumped on top of plaintiff's naked body

and oiled body treating it like a slip-in slide

and knocking the wind out of plaintiff

due to his enormous size.

Ha ha, sorry, I can't help but laugh there.

Due to his enormous size,

in other words, you big fat ass go to the gym

and for all of you people out there listening,

stop making these people famous please,

stop making these fucking morons famous.

While Defendant Druski was raping plaintiff,

Defendant Diddy sat in a chair near the bed

and began masturbating while recording plaintiff's rape

by Defendant Druski.

Another party's phone fell on the floor near plaintiff.

Plaintiff then attempted to grab the phone

but it slipped out of her hands and onto the floor

due to the oil lubricant.

That had been doused all over her person

by Defendant's Diddy and Druski.

Defendant Diddy began laughing as plaintiff attempts

to grab the phone.

Throughout this violent gang rape, Defendant Diddy

made constant belittling remarks to Defendant Druski

including that he owned her now.

At some point during this ordeal,

plaintiff remembers Defendant referring

to another Defendant Doe as Cornelius

and remembered the name because it was so odd and unique.

Plaintiff has come to discover

that Defendant Doe Cornelius who raped her

was Defendant Odell.

Plaintiff's body was becoming more and more limp

over the course of the violent rape

until eventually she had no control over her body

nor could she move her body.

When Defendant Druski finished raping plaintiff,

Defendant KK entered the room to examine

the condition of plaintiff who was barely able to move

or control her bodily functions.

Defendant KK examined plaintiff

to see if she needed assistance

and was about to give plaintiff an IV fluid.

Plaintiff cannot be certain.

Is she did or did not receive such an intravenous intervention?

Defendant KK then opened a different bag,

different than the one Defendant Diddy removed the oil from

where plaintiff observed several medicine bottles,

IV fluid bags, and other unidentifiable powder-like drugs.

Defendant KK then removed a pill

from one of the medicine bottles

and gave it to Defendant Diddy.

Defendant Diddy then inserted the pill

on the plaintiff's mouth and down her throat

to where a plaintiff had no choice

but to ingest the unknown pill.

Defendant Diddy, Shane, KK, Odell and Druski

then exited the residents to the backyard

where they smoked marijuana and cigarettes.

What's up, fools?

Man of the J. O's all here from the WWE.

When it's just me between matches, it's day one itch.

That means it's chumba time.

With hundreds of casino-style games

and new titles arriving weekly,

there's always something French to try at chumba casino.

The daily booze make it even more fun

and have me about to get them all during my downtime.

Ready for a fun way to chill out

and enjoy a few minutes for yourself?

Let's chumba.

No purchase necessary.

VGW Group Void were prohibited by law, CTs and Cs.

21 Plus sponsored by chumba casino.

Plaintiff remained in an almost lifeless state

and defendant-chains bedroom

until she finally regained her bodily functions.

Plaintiff then began looking for her clothes and her purse

that contained her car keys and cell phone

but could not discover them in the room

or anywhere in the apartment.

Plaintiff was only able to find the t-shirt on the floor

which he put on to cover her naked body.

Plaintiff also observed the black condom wrapper

on the floor of the bedroom

which he assumed was used by one of the defendants,

most likely defendant diddy during the rape.

Plaintiff then found the knife

with the assistance of doe plaintiffs

and headed to the backyard where defendants were smoking

as that was the only way to exit the premises onto the street.

Plaintiff concealed the knife on her left side

as she exited the apartment to the backyard area

upon coming to the exit of the home

which led to the backyard.

Plaintiff was met by defendant Big Home ECC

who was standing at the door between the residents

and the backyard.

By the time the plaintiff was able to compose herself

and come to the backyard,

defendant KK was no longer in the backyard

but upstairs on the patio balcony with defendant Brandy.

Defendant doe allowed plaintiff to walk to the backyard

where defendants were still smoking.

Defendant doe did not see the knife

that plaintiff concealed on her left side

as it was obstructed by the oversized t-shirt

plaintiff was wearing.

Plaintiff observed defendant diddy still partially nude

from the assault while the other defendants

had on their clothing.

Defendant Shane then left to the upstairs portion

of the patio balcony where defendants KK and Brandy

were already situated.

Plaintiff then sat down on a makeshift seat in the backyard

when defendant diddy noticed her presence

and remarked that he was surprised she was able to walk

because he had given her enough drugs to take out a horse.

Plaintiff then asked defendant diddy what he gave her

and he laughed and did not provide a response.

Defendant diddy made further comments to plaintiffs

in a jovial friendly manner asking her

why they hadn't partied together before

because it was so much fun

and he hadn't had any ask that tight in a while.

All right, we're gonna wrap up right here

and in the next episode we're gonna pick up

where we left off and that's with defendant big homie CC.

If you'd like to contact me,

you can do that at bobbykopucci at protonmail.com

that's bobbyscapuccci at protonmail.com

or if you prefer, you can find me on x at bobbys

on your score, C-A-P-U-C-C-I.

All the links that we discussed can be found

in the description box.

Tyler Reddick here from 2311 Racing.

Victory Lane?

Yeah, it's even better with Chumba by my side.

Race to ChumbaCasino.com, let's Chumba.

No purchase necessary, VTW Group,

voidware prohibited by law, CT and Cs, 21 plus,

sponsored by ChumbaCasino.

Csino, Taller Reddick here from 2311 Racing.

Victory Lane, yeah, it's even better with Chumba by my side.