Loading...
Loading...

Well, some fools, men of the J.U.
So here from the WWE.
When it's just me between matches, it's day one itch.
And that means it's Chumba time.
With hundreds of Casino style games
and new titles arriving weekly,
there's always something fresh to try at Chumba Casino.
The daily booze make it even more fun.
And have me, bout to get them all during my downtime.
Ready for a fun way to chill out
and enjoy a few minutes for yourself?
Let's Chumba.
No purchase necessary.
VGW Group Void were prohibited by law, CTs and Cs.
21 Plus sponsored by Chumba Casino.
What's up everyone and welcome back to another episode
of the Ditty Diaries.
Ashley Parham has filed an amended complaint against Ditty
and she has named some pretty interesting co-defendants.
And those co-defendants are
Christina Quorum, Shane Pierce,
Ruben Valdez, John Pellate, O'Dell Beckham Jr.,
Drew Desbordes, AKA Drew Ski,
Jacqueline Wright, AKA Jaguar Wright,
Helena Harris Scott, Matthias Gonzalez,
Brandy Cunningham, Janice Combs, Keith Lux,
AKA Big Homey C.C.
And John and Jane Doe's one through 10.
So let's dive into this document
and see what Ashley Parham's talking about.
Case number three-24-cv-07191-RFL.
Amended complaint.
Demand for a jury trial.
Introduction.
This case involves Rico Enterprise
for the purpose of sexual assault,
battery, rape, sexual abuse, false imprisonment
and kidnapping for the personal and financial benefit
to the Enterprise participants.
Defendant Ditty has been sued by countless individuals
for crime similar to the ones enumerated in this complaint.
Defendant Ditty is currently a federal inmate
awaiting criminal trial for crimes similar to the ones
enumerated in this complaint.
Defendant KK is an employee of Defendant Ditty,
often referred to by Defendant Ditty as his right-hand woman.
Defendant Ditty's predatory behavior was constant
and well-known by several individuals,
including Defendant Ditty's employees, staff, friends, family
and associates.
In fact, Defendant Ditty's sons are being sued
for engaging in the same type of deviant behavior
as their father has pled in a Los Angeles Superior Court
filing.
Defendant Ditty was able to effectuate his crimes
and evade capture and prosecution for his crimes
for almost 30 years due to his position of power
and influence in the entertainment industry.
Defendant Ditty exploited his position
and his relationship with powerful individuals
to force sexual acts through exploitation,
fear, manipulation, physical threats,
emotional abuse, intimidation and retaliation.
Had any of the previous victims of Defendant Ditty
been taking seriously or had any of the better as reported,
Defendant Ditty's actions, a law enforcement,
Defendant Ditty's illegal and unfathomable behavior
could have been prevented.
Instead, Defendant Ditty was able to rein his abuse
and terrorism on countless victims for over 30 years.
Additionally, had Defendant Ditty's numerous business partners
and associates not ignored Defendant Ditty's deviant behavior,
Defendant Ditty would have been unable to continue
his pattern of abuse over such a long period of time.
As alleged herein, Defendant Ditty abused his position
of power in the entertainment industry
to garner loyalty and trust from the public at large
and law enforcement while instilling fear and intimidation
in the hearts of his voluminous victims.
Alligations against Defendant Ditty
have been disregarded for decades,
therefore creating a failure to protect victims
like the plaintiff's name herein.
Unlike most victims of Defendant Ditty
who were employees, sex workers,
or individuals seeking out Defendant's help
to launch their careers,
Plaintiff Parham does not fall into any of those categories.
Plaintiff Parham met Defendant Ditty due to happenstance
and still ended up being brutally victimized
in a similar manner as described by the others
who have preceded her filing and others
who surely will follow including Plaintiff those herein.
Plaintiff John and Jane Doe met with Defendant Ditty
through their connections in the music industry
as Plaintiff John Doe was a previous
plaintiff against Michael Jackson
for a sexual assault as a minor.
Due to Defendant's agreements
to participate in a corrupt enterprise, Plaintiff,
and countless other victims have been immeasurably
and permanently harmed.
Plaintiff alleged as follow upon personal knowledge
as to themselves and their acts and experience
and as to all other matters upon information
and belief including investigations conducted
by their attorneys.
Parties.
Plaintiff Ashley Parham is an individual
who resides in and domiciled in California.
Plaintiff John Doe is an individual
who is domiciled in Nevada
and resides in another state purposefully
to protect his safety and identity.
Plaintiff Jane Doe is an individual
who is domiciled in Nevada
and resides in another state purposefully
to protect her safety and identity.
Defendant Combs is an individual
who resides in and is domiciled in California.
Defendant also owns a residence in Florida.
However, Defendant Diddy is currently
an inmate at MDC in Brooklyn, New York.
Defendant Cristiano Chorum, Defendant KK
is an individual who, upon information and belief,
resides in and is domiciled in either California
or North Carolina.
Defendant Shane Pierce, Defendant Shane
is an individual who resides in
and is domiciled in California.
Defendant Rubin Lyra Valdez, Defendant Valdez,
is an individual who resides
and is domiciled in California.
Defendant John Lawrence Pellate
is an individual who resides in
and is domiciled in Nevada or Hawaii.
Defendant O'Dell Beckham, Jr.
Defendant O'Dell is an individual
who resides and is domiciled in Florida.
Previously referred to as John Doe
and Plaintiff Parham's original complaint.
Defendant Drew Disbordis, Defendant Drew Ski,
is an individual who, upon information and belief,
resides in and is domiciled in either Maryland or Georgia,
previously referred to as John Doe
and Plaintiff Parham's original complaint.
Defendant Jacqueline Wright, Jaguyer,
is an individual who, upon information and belief,
resides in and is domiciled in California or Nevada.
Defendant Helena Harris Scott, Defendant Helena,
is an individual who, upon information and belief,
resides in and is domiciled in California.
Defendant Matthias Golden Gonzales, Defendant Gonzales,
is an individual who, upon information and belief,
resides in and is domiciled in Nevada.
Defendant Brandi Klonenger, Cunningham,
Defendant Brandi is an individual
who, upon information and belief,
resides in is domiciled in Arkansas,
previously referred to as Jane Doe
and Plaintiff Parham's original complaint.
Defendant Janice Combs, is an individual who resides
and is domiciled in Florida, Defendant Keith Lux,
Defendant Big Home ECC, is an individual
who, upon information and belief, resides
and is domiciled in Nevada.
Defendant John and Jane Doe's one through 10,
Defendant Doe's one through 10,
are individuals who, upon information and belief,
reside in and are domiciled in various states,
but mainly California.
Jurisdiction, venue, timeliness, and California's
sexual abuse and cover-up accountability act.
This court has federal question,
jurisdiction under 28 code, section 1331,
and supplemental jurisdiction under US code 28,
section 1367.
For the state law claims alleged,
this court has personal jurisdiction,
overall defendants, because they have purposefully
availed themselves, are residents of the state,
and or were conducting business in California,
in this lawsuit arise, out of the acts
that occurred in California,
and relates to their contracts and contracts in California.
Further, the pervasive culture of abuse,
including sexual assault, rape, inappropriate touching,
and wielding power and control over plaintiffs,
were a constant presence when defendant Didi,
and the other herein named defendants,
engaged in the acts described herein.
The location of all relevant events herein alleged,
occurred within the jurisdiction of California.
Plaintiffs were harmed and injured in California
by defendants.
Venue is proper in this judicial district
under US code 28, section 1391, B and C.
Further, venue is proper in this judicial district,
pursuant to US code 18, section 1965.
This action is timely under federal racketeering
influenced and corrupt organizations act,
US code 18, section 1961,
as the Didi sexual abuse and cover-up enterprise,
fraudulently concealed the ongoing sexual
and deceitful activity,
towards inconspiracy taking place within Didi sexual abuse
and cover-up enterprise.
This action is also timely under California's sexual
abuse and cover-up accountability act,
California's sexual abuse and cover-up accountability act,
AB 2777, amended California Civil Procedure
section 340.16, extending the statute of limitations,
opening up revival window for adult survivors
of sexual assault and related claims and acknowledging
that a two-year statute of limitations
simply does not provide sexual assault survivors
adequate time to heal from the physical
and emotional trauma of sexual assault
and prepare for a civil case.
California Bill Analysis,
AB 2777, 614, 2022.
When the perpetrator is someone of victim trust,
it can take years for the victim
even to identify what happened to them as sexual assault.
For these reasons, it's self-evident
that the unique nature of the emotional
and psychological consequences of sexual assault,
especially on women,
can paradoxically permit wrongdoers to escape civil
accountability unless statutes of limitation
are crafted to prevent this injustice from occurring.
Moreover, when these data are combined
with widespread news reports of major companies
being accused of covering up sexual assaults
by their employees,
it's self-evident that statutes of limitation
for sexual assault need to be crafted
in a way that does not cause the covering up company
to enjoy the fruits of their cover-up solely
because our statutes of limitation permit
and thus motivate such behavior.
Well, so, foos, men of the J.O. sole here from the WWE.
When it's just me between matches, it's day one itch.
That means it's chumba time.
With hundreds of casino-style games
and new titles arriving weekly,
there's always something fresh to try at chumba casino.
The daily booze may get even more fun
and have me about to get them all during my downtime.
Ready for a fun way to chill out
and enjoy a few minutes for yourself?
Let's chum.
No purchase necessary.
VGW Group voidware prohibited by law,
CTs and Cs, 21 plus sponsored by chumba casino.
Defendants fraudulent concealment
through active attempts to cover up
caused an ongoing trauma to plaintiff
and caused her to suffer.
Plaintiff Parham has repressed her experience
until recently when defendant Diddy was accused
by his ex-girlfriend, former employee Cassie Ventura
and others regarding their experiences with defendant Diddy.
Accessing the civil justice system
allows victims, survivors and opportunity
to seek accountability for the years of suffering,
caused by the abuse they experienced
and a chance to take back the power they lost
as a result of the sexual assault.
Plaintiff's John and Jane Doe
have been paralyzed in fear,
have had to change their names
and frequently move from their residences
for fear of being kidnapped,
raped and abused and assaulted by defendant herein.
Plaintiff Doe's hereby invoke the pseudonym
to protect their lives
from the long reach of the Diddy sexual abuse
and cover up enterprise.
Additionally, any statute of limitations
applicable to the blow claims, if any,
is told and defendants are e-stopped
from raising such a defense
as their actions describe below,
to pry of plaintiff of the opportunity
to commence this lawsuit before now
as well as other equitable and legal bases.
All right, we're going to wrap up part one right here
and in the next episode,
we're going to pick up with factual allegations,
comments, all counts.
If you'd like to contact me,
you can do that at Bobbi Kupuchi at protonmail.com.
That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at protonmail.com.
Or if you prefer, you can find me on X
at B-O-B-B-Y underscore C-A-P-U-C-C-I.
All of the links that we discussed
can be found in the description box.
What's up everyone and welcome
to another episode of the Diddy Diaries.
In this episode, we're going to pick up
where we left off with the Ashley Parum
amended complaint filed against Diddy
that added a whole bunch of people
including Odell Beckham and Jaguar Wright and Druski.
Factual allegations, comment, all counts, plaintiff Parum.
Plaintiff met defendant Shane in February 2018
after an altercation with another man at a bar
and defendant Shane came to plaintiff's rescue.
While outside the bar with friends and other patrons,
defendant Shane FaceTime video call Defendant Diddy
and was showing people Defendant Diddy
in the video on his phone,
attempting to impress people with his famous friend.
Defendant Shane then showed plaintiff
Defendant Diddy on his video call,
which plaintiff ignored, stating she was not impressed by him,
knowing Defendant Diddy because she believed Defendant Diddy
had something to do with the murder of rapper Tupac Shakur.
Visible in the FaceTime call was Defendant Diddy
and some of his children, including his sons,
Christian and Quincy.
It appeared from plaintiff's perspective,
Defendant Diddy was having a get together at his home
during the time of the FaceTime call with Defendant Shane.
Defendant Diddy heard plaintiff statement
and made a remark that plaintiff would pay for his statements
regarding Tupac and overall dismissal of Defendant Diddy.
On March 23, 2018, Defendant Shane invited plaintiff
over to his home to assist him with his cancer medications
because he stated he was weak
and unable to open his medication.
Upon plaintiff's arrival, Defendant Shane informed plaintiff
that he wanted to give her a ride in his new car.
Plaintiff and Defendant Shane left his residence
for a brief period and then returned.
Once they returned, Defendant Shane left the door
to his apartment partially open and stated that the door was a jar
because there was an issue with the door
where it wouldn't close completely.
Defendant Shane was renting an apartment
on the lower floor of a home in Orinda, California.
Defendant Shane had a separate entrance into his residence
that led to the backyard of the home.
The home also had a main entrance on Loma Vista Drive.
Defendant Shane rented the home from a woman
who lived in the upstairs portion of the home
and had two dogs who resided with her.
Plaintiff and Defendant Shane then began to watch a movie
and Defendant Shane offered her a glass of water
which he retrieved and brought back to plaintiff.
All approximately 10 minutes after plaintiff and Defendant Shane
returned from their drive,
Defendant Diddy entered Defendant Shane's residence.
Defendant Diddy entered the home in a grand,
ready-to-party manner.
His grandiose entrance was so loud
that the dogs upstairs began barking.
Defendant Diddy did not enter the home
through the backyard entrance,
but instead through the main entrance.
Along with Defendant Diddy were his bodyguard,
Defendant Big Home ECC, Defendant KK, Defendant Brandy,
Defendant Do2, who upon information and belief
is a friend of Defendant Shane and Diddy
and Defendant Diddy's driver, Do3,
who remained outside in his vehicle
during the duration of plaintiff's assault.
Plaintiff believed Defendant Shane invited her over
to set her up to be assaulted by Defendant Diddy
because of the statement she made
about Defendant Diddy among prior.
Upon Defendant Diddy's arrival,
he immediately began to antagonize the plaintiff,
stating that she thought that she would never see him in person,
pay for her statements about two-pock
during the video call and Defendant Diddy caught plaintiff.
Plaintiff was in shock as she never believed
that she would ever see her meet Defendant Diddy in real life,
let alone in the small apartment rented by Defendant Shane.
Defendant Diddy began advancing towards
where a plaintiff was sitting on Defendant Shane's bed
with a knife and held it to the right side of plaintiff's face
and threatened to give her a glass-gall smile
and retaliation for her previous statements on the video call.
Defendant KK told Defendant Diddy
that she did not think giving plaintiff a glass-gall smile
would be advantageous to their potential clients
who they could sell plaintiff for sex too.
Defendant KK then made a threat to plaintiff
that they could chipper off anywhere in the world
and that she would never see her family
or anyone she knew ever again.
Defendant Shane then partially on dress plaintiff
then Defendant Diddy removed the remainder of plaintiff's clothing,
removing the knife from her face
and then retrieved a bottle of liquid from a large fanny pack.
Defendant Diddy then squirted a bottle of liquid on plaintiff,
which placed her in fear that she was being squirted
with a chemical substance like acid.
Plaintiff soon realized the substance was an oil or lubricant,
plaintiff was squirted and this liquid substance
all over the entirety of her naked body.
Defendant KK then told by Defendant Diddy
to insert what looked like a syringe
from sterile packaging into plaintiff's vagina.
Defendant KK did his told while assisted by Defendant Brandy
and then told Defendant Diddy
that they were unable to use the IUD
because it had prematurely been released from its packaging.
Defendant Diddy upset by this took the syringe from Defendant KK
and tried inserting it in plaintiff's vagina instead.
Defendant KK and Diddy began to argue as Defendant KK
continued to advise Defendant Diddy
that since the IUD had been prematurely released
from its packaging, it was no way they could insert it
into plaintiff's vagina effectively.
After some time Defendant Diddy heated the advice
of Defendant KK and removed the syringe from plaintiff's vagina
and handed it to Defendant KK.
Defendant KK and Defendant Brandy
then exited Defendant Shane's residence,
leaving plaintiff alone with Defendant Diddy, Shane,
and John Doe's who had been named herein.
Defendant Diddy then picked up a television remote
that was near plaintiff and violently inserted it
into plaintiff's vagina.
Defendant Diddy while violently raping plaintiff
with a television remote told plaintiff that her life
was in his hands and that he wanted he could take her
and she would never be seen again.
Plaintiff began hysterically crying
from the threats by Defendant Diddy
along with the plan of being violently vaginally raped
by Defendant Diddy with the television remote
as well as the lingering pain from the ordeal
with the IUD's syringe insertion.
Defendant Diddy then instructed Defendant Shane
to turn plaintiff on her stomach,
seemingly tired of hearing the plaintiffs
blood-curdling screams.
Defendant Shane then grabbed plaintiff
by her abdomen and hips, turned plaintiff on her stomach.
Defendant Diddy then inserted Defendant Shane
to put a pillow over her head because he didn't
want to see her face or hear her cries
and instructed Defendant Shane to anally rape plaintiff.
Defendant Shane did as he was told by Defendant Diddy
and began to anally rape plaintiff,
Defendant Diddy then violently rape plaintiff
anally after Defendant Shane.
Defendant Doe too then joined Defendant Diddy and Shane
taking turns anally raping plaintiff.
Immediately after Defendant Doe to rape plaintiff,
he exited Defendant Shane's residence.
Defendant Diddy then instructed another Defendant Doe
to also rape plaintiff.
Defendant Doe has been determined
to be Defendant Druski.
Wow.
That's some pretty powerful shit right there, huh?
And Mr. Druski running around on the internet
like some big shot.
Now he's gonna have to answer for this shit.
Instead of immediately raping plaintiff,
Defendant Druski doused plaintiff with more oil lubricant
and then jumped on top of plaintiff's naked body
and oiled body treating it like a slip-in slide
and knocking the wind out of plaintiff
due to his enormous size.
Ha ha, sorry, I can't help but laugh there.
Due to his enormous size,
in other words, you big fat ass go to the gym
and for all of you people out there listening,
stop making these people famous please,
stop making these fucking morons famous.
While Defendant Druski was raping plaintiff,
Defendant Diddy sat in a chair near the bed
and began masturbating while recording plaintiff's rape
by Defendant Druski.
Another party's phone fell on the floor near plaintiff.
Plaintiff then attempted to grab the phone
but it slipped out of her hands and onto the floor
due to the oil lubricant.
That had been doused all over her person
by Defendant's Diddy and Druski.
Defendant Diddy began laughing as plaintiff attempts
to grab the phone.
Throughout this violent gang rape, Defendant Diddy
made constant belittling remarks to Defendant Druski
including that he owned her now.
At some point during this ordeal,
plaintiff remembers Defendant referring
to another Defendant Doe as Cornelius
and remembered the name because it was so odd and unique.
Plaintiff has come to discover
that Defendant Doe Cornelius who raped her
was Defendant Odell.
Plaintiff's body was becoming more and more limp
over the course of the violent rape
until eventually she had no control over her body
nor could she move her body.
When Defendant Druski finished raping plaintiff,
Defendant KK entered the room to examine
the condition of plaintiff who was barely able to move
or control her bodily functions.
Defendant KK examined plaintiff
to see if she needed assistance
and was about to give plaintiff an IV fluid.
Plaintiff cannot be certain.
Is she did or did not receive such an intravenous intervention?
Defendant KK then opened a different bag,
different than the one Defendant Diddy removed the oil from
where plaintiff observed several medicine bottles,
IV fluid bags, and other unidentifiable powder-like drugs.
Defendant KK then removed a pill
from one of the medicine bottles
and gave it to Defendant Diddy.
Defendant Diddy then inserted the pill
on the plaintiff's mouth and down her throat
to where a plaintiff had no choice
but to ingest the unknown pill.
Defendant Diddy, Shane, KK, Odell and Druski
then exited the residents to the backyard
where they smoked marijuana and cigarettes.
What's up, fools?
Man of the J. O's all here from the WWE.
When it's just me between matches, it's day one itch.
That means it's chumba time.
With hundreds of casino-style games
and new titles arriving weekly,
there's always something French to try at chumba casino.
The daily booze make it even more fun
and have me about to get them all during my downtime.
Ready for a fun way to chill out
and enjoy a few minutes for yourself?
Let's chumba.
No purchase necessary.
VGW Group Void were prohibited by law, CTs and Cs.
21 Plus sponsored by chumba casino.
Plaintiff remained in an almost lifeless state
and defendant-chains bedroom
until she finally regained her bodily functions.
Plaintiff then began looking for her clothes and her purse
that contained her car keys and cell phone
but could not discover them in the room
or anywhere in the apartment.
Plaintiff was only able to find the t-shirt on the floor
which he put on to cover her naked body.
Plaintiff also observed the black condom wrapper
on the floor of the bedroom
which he assumed was used by one of the defendants,
most likely defendant diddy during the rape.
Plaintiff then found the knife
with the assistance of doe plaintiffs
and headed to the backyard where defendants were smoking
as that was the only way to exit the premises onto the street.
Plaintiff concealed the knife on her left side
as she exited the apartment to the backyard area
upon coming to the exit of the home
which led to the backyard.
Plaintiff was met by defendant Big Home ECC
who was standing at the door between the residents
and the backyard.
By the time the plaintiff was able to compose herself
and come to the backyard,
defendant KK was no longer in the backyard
but upstairs on the patio balcony with defendant Brandy.
Defendant doe allowed plaintiff to walk to the backyard
where defendants were still smoking.
Defendant doe did not see the knife
that plaintiff concealed on her left side
as it was obstructed by the oversized t-shirt
plaintiff was wearing.
Plaintiff observed defendant diddy still partially nude
from the assault while the other defendants
had on their clothing.
Defendant Shane then left to the upstairs portion
of the patio balcony where defendants KK and Brandy
were already situated.
Plaintiff then sat down on a makeshift seat in the backyard
when defendant diddy noticed her presence
and remarked that he was surprised she was able to walk
because he had given her enough drugs to take out a horse.
Plaintiff then asked defendant diddy what he gave her
and he laughed and did not provide a response.
Defendant diddy made further comments to plaintiffs
in a jovial friendly manner asking her
why they hadn't partied together before
because it was so much fun
and he hadn't had any ask that tight in a while.
All right, we're gonna wrap up right here
and in the next episode we're gonna pick up
where we left off and that's with defendant big homie CC.
If you'd like to contact me,
you can do that at bobbykopucci at protonmail.com
that's bobbyscapuccci at protonmail.com
or if you prefer, you can find me on x at bobbys
on your score, C-A-P-U-C-C-I.
All the links that we discussed can be found
in the description box.
Tyler Reddick here from 2311 Racing.
Victory Lane?
Yeah, it's even better with Chumba by my side.
Race to ChumbaCasino.com, let's Chumba.
No purchase necessary, VTW Group,
voidware prohibited by law, CT and Cs, 21 plus,
sponsored by ChumbaCasino.
Csino, Taller Reddick here from 2311 Racing.
Victory Lane, yeah, it's even better with Chumba by my side.

The Diddy Diaries

The Diddy Diaries

The Diddy Diaries