Mega Edition: David Boies And His Battle Against Jeffrey Epstein (4/28/26)

What's up, everyone? And welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.

David Boyz, lawyer for Virginia Roberts and Annie Farmer, has given his first interview

since Colleen Maxwell has been sentenced. And in this interview with the independent, he talks

about how the other people who were involved in all of this. And as we all know, there were a lot

of other people involved in all of this, how they should be held responsible. Now that Maxwell

has been. And for me, there is no other way that this should go. When you have as many people

involved on a day to day basis, as we had involved with Jeffrey Epstein and Colleen Maxwell,

there is no way anyone can convince, can convince me that this isn't a rico case.

And that there aren't other people who shouldn't be brought in. Now we have all of the names

Virginia has given us already. And David Boyz and company, they've handed all of that information

over to the feds. They did that in 2015. So it's not like the feds didn't have this information,

like they were waiting for somebody to come forward and clue them in on what happened. We all know

what happened. And the FBI dropped the ball like it has many, many times before when it comes to

severe, serious sexual assault investigations. Just take a look at how they're on the hook right now

when it comes to Larry Nasser. This is something that has been pervasive within the FBI.

They might not want to address it, but it's very clear for everybody else who's paying attention

that the FBI really has dropped the ball time and time again here. And if they don't go after this

the way they should and they don't go after all these other people, well, it's just another

fumble, isn't it? All right, today our article is from the independent and the author of this article

is Bevin Hurley headline Virginia Roberts lawyer on prosecuting powerful abusers.

There are many people involved in this beyond Maxwell and Epstein. Virginia Roberts attorney

tells Bevin Hurley the rich and powerful implicated in the Epstein Maxwell Maxwell sex trafficking

ring deserve to be brought to justice 100% and if there isn't a grand jury panel in panel right

now, then I don't know what they're doing because there's as much circumstantial evidence out there

to arrest people like Indyke and Khan and Sarah Kellen Vickers as there was to bring in Maxwell.

So what are they waiting for? And why have they waited this long?

When powerhouse attorney David Boyes received the news that Galen Maxwell had been sentenced to

20 years in federal prison for child sex trafficking last week, he allowed himself a rye smile.

It was very satisfying. Mr. Boyes told the independent and his first interview since the sentencing.

This was an important step. There's no doubt this was an important step. A huge a huge step

it sends a message too, right? But it only matters if the follow through continues.

What do you think whoever's out there engaging in human trafficking right now is going to see the

sentence that Galen Maxwell got or that R Kelly got and say to themselves, oh, well, this isn't

worth it. We're just going to we're going to stop because that's not going to happen no matter how harsh

the sentence is. This needs to be a message to the people who were involved and the only way that

this message can truly be sent like they say they want to send it is if they bring in the rest of

these people. But he also felt the lingering sense of unfinished business about the many wealthy

and powerful figures who have not had to answer for their roles in Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell's

decades-long pyramid scheme of abuse. I get it. I understand. Now obviously I'm nowhere near as

close to all of this as David Boises. Dude's been in the trenches fighting against Epstein

and Maxwell for years now. But I understand what he means with the unfinished business part

because I feel the same way here on this podcast. There's a lot of unfinished business.

And all of these people like Indyke and Khan and and Vickers especially, they definitely need to

be brought in. Because if not, then what has really been accomplished besides, you know, bringing

Maxwell to justice, which is great. Don't get me wrong. As I've said a million times, definitely a

huge part of fixing the problem. But it takes a little bit of the shine and the lacquer off of it

if you don't follow through with the next step. Mr. Boises has for decades been one of America's

best-known litigants, famously but unsuccessfully, representing the Democratic Party candidate Al Gore

in a case against George W. Bush to settle the contested 2000 presidential election.

The 81-year-old represented any farmer and Virginia Roberts in civil lawsuits against Epstein

and Maxwell. I remember when all of that was going on in 2000 and you had the whole battle royale

about the hanging chat and the armies of lawyers and the lawsuits and all of the days it took to

get the election locked in. And still, there's a lot of people who don't even believe that those

election results were what they are. In 2015, he handed over their entire civil file to the Justice

Department in the hopes they would investigate and prosecute Epstein, Maxwell, and some of the

dozens of other rich and powerful associates named and identified by Miss Roberts. And this should

happen back then. All of those people who were directly implicated by Virginia Roberts, especially

considering she went on record and stated those names, those people should all be looked at

under the world's largest microscope. Every one of them should be brought in, put under oath,

and they should all have to testify about their relationship with Epstein. And that includes guys

like Bill Richardson. Because everything we've heard from Virginia leading up to this point has been

at least some of the foundational basis for these convictions. And we've seen what's happened to

people when there's been defamation lawsuits as well. Those people end up getting charged afterwards.

She has shown that she's to be believed, at least in my opinion. So when she's pointing her finger

at these other people, why should I believe that they weren't involved, especially considering that

you can put the receipts together and the paperwork to put them in Epstein's presence a whole bunch of

times. So all of those people, every last one of them should be brought in. And if this was a

rico case, like it should have been, they all would have been brought in. But so far, only three

people have been held criminally liable. They are Epstein, who died by suicide in prison in 2019,

allegedly, age 66, while awaiting trial for sex trafficking. His close friend, Jean-Luc Brunel,

76, who in February hanged himself in a Paris jail, where he had been held for a year on suspicion

of rape of minors and trafficking of minors for sexual exploitation. And Maxwell convicted in New

York on five sex trafficking counts in late December and jailed for 20 years at her sentencing on

June 28th. But you know, it's just a coincidence that Brunel and Epstein both suffered the same

fate, huh? Now with Brunel, it doesn't seem as odd, the matter of his death. Again, I'm not an

expert on French lockups or French prisons. So I'm certainly not somebody who would sit here and

tell you with any confidence one way or the other. Oh, I'm certain that XXX or X occurred in that

French jail. I have no idea. Looks to me like Brunel probably killed himself. Now is that 100

percent certain? Man, is anything 100 percent certain in this case besides the fact that these

people are scumbags. But with Epstein, boy, oh boy, they're sure as a lot there. The cameras,

Dartaglioni, I won't be a dead horse, but you get my drift. There are many people who are involved

in this beyond Maxwell and Epstein and Brunel. Mr. Boyz told the independent sex trafficking could

not have gone on remotely at the scale at which it went on or for the duration that it went on

without the collaboration and cooperation of a lot of additional people. These people too should

be brought to justice, but as time goes on and the prosecutors don't do anything, I think the

chances that actually happens diminishes. Look, he's not wrong. He's not wrong. He's just given

you the truth. We all want to hope and pray that the prosecutors are going to move forward and that

the co-conspirators are going to be brought to justice. But we also know that the reality that we live in,

there's little of that to be had. Many of the famous names who flew on Epstein so-called Lolita Express

Private Jet have come out during civil litigation and that Maxwell's trial. They include Bill Clinton,

Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew. The two former U.S. presidents have adamantly denied any knowledge

of Epstein's crimes while Prince Andrew settled a civil sexual assault case with Ms. Roberts

for a reported 17 million in February. They say 14 million here. That's not the right number.

But there are many names who have remained out of the public eye. Their identities hidden and sealed

files at the Justice Department. A lot of the materials from our 2015-16 civil actions,

which the government got, are still sealed to the public, Mr. Boyz said. These kinds of records

should not be sealed. He is 100% correct about that, especially in this case. If there is any

elected official or anyone who's taking or has taken public money involved in any lists such as

this, they should be outed right away. They generally fall into two categories, Mr. Boyz says.

They are Epstein and Maxwell lieutenants who were involved in recruiting, grooming,

and supervising the survivors that were trafficked. And then there were, there are the other people

who the survivors were trafficked too, which include a lot of rich and powerful people around the

world, Mr. Boyz added. They're all heavily protected by cadres of lawyers and PR consultants

and political consultants. And you've got to have a prosecutor who is really committed to the

cause of sex trafficking that is prepared to take that group on. Well, if there's any prosecutor

out there who has that courage, you better believe that there are plenty of us who are ready to take

the fight to these people. And if you have any kind of interest and later on political office,

this is a surefire way to get yourself elected. You go after people like Epstein's associates.

You are definitely going to get the attention of people who are paying attention.

And those votes, boy, they'll sure pour in. Imagine that campaign. I'm the man or woman

who put away Jeffrey Epstein or Epstein's associates. I mean, I continued the case when no one

else wanted to do it. My career could have been ended, you know, yada, yada, yada, yada.

But there's no one out there that wants to do it. Why? What are all of these prosecutors so scared of?

Again, it comes back to the SDNY, right? Like I always say, the folks over at the SDNY, they run

around and they talk about how they're the greatest at this. They're the greatest at that. They

bring in all these convictions. Well, where they at? They bring in convictions. If it's, you know,

people like maybe Khalif Browder or your cousin, but when it comes to these rich and powerful people

like Glenn Dubin, like Les Wexner, like Alan Dershowitz, these people don't get brought to justice.

That's only for peons, right? The children have never liked us.

Mr. Boyz said many of the survivors were easy to ignore as Epstein and Maxwell deliberately

sought out vulnerable girls, often from single-parent households and difficult financial

circumstances. Some had already suffered sexual abuse. More names are coming out all the time.

The question is whether that results in people being brought to justice. I'm a little pessimistic

at this point. Yeah, he's not the only one and he has all rights to be because it is a cause

for pessimism. You would think that when they had the chance here with Maxwell, they would have

really extended the scope of what they were going for, but they didn't do it.

And at the time, I've said a million times, it's very concerning to see the small scope

of what their charges are. And then come time for sentencing and the trial. People are all shocked

that a bunch of names weren't named. Well, if you were paying attention, you knew that this case

was crafted in that manner. But now that Maxwell has been hemmed up and they've had a successful

prosecution here. You would think that they'd smell some blood in the water and they'd go harder

in the paint, but that is not the case. During Tuesday sentencing, Judge Allison Nathan named

former Epstein associate Sarah Kellan as a knowing participant in the criminal conspiracy.

The judge says this. And you mean to tell me there's no prosecutors sitting around right now,

stuffing their face full of expensive lunch food from Manhattan in the SDNY that wants to go

after these people or after Sarah Kellan vickers? Why is that? Ms. Kellan was identified by survivors

at Maxwell's trial as having booked them for massages with Epstein at his Palm Beach mansion.

The defendant, Maxwell, was Epstein's number two and Lady of the House Judge Nathan said during

the sentencing. At some point, Kellan took over some of the defendant's duties, but even after

that time, the defendant retained her leadership position as evidenced by Carolyn's testimony.

Yeah, that's how it broke down. She was the number two. I always break it down in terms like

the mafia. You have Epstein. He's the boss. You have Maxwell, the under boss and John Luke

Brunel. Well, that was the consigliary and underneath all of them are the capos. And Sarah Kellan

vickers is as much of a capo as Mike Francisse was.

Carolyn was one of the four survivors who testified at Maxwell's trial and was only identified by

her first name. Miss Roberts has claimed she was trafficked to have sex with Harvard University

law professor Alan Dershowitz. The allegation has not been proven and professor Dershowitz

adamantly denies it or any knowledge of other offending. And he's not the only one, right?

Dershowitz certainly isn't the only one, but he's certainly one that had had the finger pointed

at him, but has that affected him? No, of course not. We saw Mr. I kept my underpants on. Has he

lost any status or prestige? Has anyone kicked in his door stole his cell phone so they can go through

records? None of that happened. Instead, the naked volleyball player of Martha's Vineyard finds

himself in the spotlight. Once again, defending Donald Trump this time. So another person who has

been credibly accused here has not had to answer any kind of serious questions from people in

authority when it comes to what they're being accused of. In 2019, Miss Roberts sued

professor Dershowitz for defamation and emotional distress. And he since countersuited the case

is ongoing. Professor Dershowitz told the independent in an interview he had visited Epstein's

home in Palm Beach and his private island, Little St. James, and never seen any younger naked women.

It was a deep dark secret. Everything he did in part in a part of the house which was off

limits to anybody he said. Nobody knew any of this. Nobody would have associated with Epstein if we

had known any of this. Bro, shut up. You're over there getting massages by who the hell knows who

at his house. Mr. I kept my underpants on Dershowitz. And we all know what massage was synonymous for

over in the world of Epstein. So Dershowitz is another one. And I'm glad he's going to get out

it here in this defamation case. Dershowitz said he saw pictures on the walls of the Palm Beach

mansion of the billionaire with famous people, including Bill Clinton and Fidel Castro. Oh,

a man accused of sexual crimes and the dictator. Fantastic company.

He had me on the wall. I was one of the famous people and believe me, I was fully dressed. You know,

he makes a joke of it like anyone thinks he's funny. Like his old ass is a comedian or something.

Bro, the only thing funny is that you think people actually believe you. That's what's funny.

He said he believed Maxwell's sentence and conviction was unjust. Of course he did.

Birds of a feather and all right. Mr. Boyz claimed it was stretching cred- cred- credulity for anyone

in Epstein's orbit to maintain. They couldn't have known what was going on. Everybody who was

associated with the survivors has heard reams of testimony about how obvious it was what Epstein

was doing. Survivor, after survivor and law enforcement officers have testified how there were

all these topless girls at the swimming pool and naked pictures of girls around the house. It was

not something that people could miss. No, it wasn't. He had pieces of chess pieces carved into the

likeness of his employees naked and shit. He had pictures of gross ass, stank ass, galane,

Maxwell's busted ass all over the walls naked and shit. What do you mean you missed it?

Mr. Boyz chairman and managing partner at Boyz Schiller Flexner typically charges up to $2,000

an hour for his services. But he and fellow managing partner Sigrid McCauley represented Miss

Roberts free of charge throughout their pursuit of Maxwell and Epstein. And that's great,

that's good that they did that. But in reality, we know that they also did it to help their own

profile. They know that moving forward, this is good for them. They win this case against these

people. Bang, they're going to make a ton of dough. And the same goes for a prosecutor. And that's

why it's so crazy to me that not one of these prosecutors, even a junior prosecutor, hasn't

stepped up to the plate and said, look, give me that whole entire caseload and let me slam these

fools. In court on Tuesday, Miss McCauley read a survivor impact statement from Miss Roberts,

which she described Maxwell as a wolf in sheep's clothing. You could have put an end to the rapes,

the molestations, the sickening manipulations that you arranged, witnessed, and even took part in.

You could have called the authorities and reported that you were part of something awful. And she

didn't, right? And if you don't do that, then what? You're complicit. Oh, I was scared. I was held

against my will. Okay, well, what happens when Epstein is gone from your life and you still have

not come forward. Speculation that Maxwell could flip on her former associates in order to receive a

reduced sentence has never eventuated. Her brother, Ian Maxwell, told the Sunday Times in January

that she had no plans to pursue a plea deal or offer up information about who else was involved.

Maxwell has maintained her innocence and plans to appeal the verdict and the sentence.

The independent contacted the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York

to ask if it plans to prosecute anyone else in relation to the conspiracy. And if not,

whether it would unseal any records related to the case. Public affairs chief,

Nicholas Biosi declined to comment. Oh, of course, that's what they'll say. Oh, it's an ongoing

investigation. You can't have any of these files. You know, you the taxpayer. So if this is not

an ongoing investigation, still, and they're not going after the co-conspirators, they need to turn

over and unseal every file that they have. And then let's see what's what? My guess is, unfortunately,

folks, they won't do either. All right, that's going to do it. If you'd like to contact me,

you can do that at Bobby Capucci at protonmel.com. That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at protonmel.com.

You can also find me on Twitter at B-O-B-B-Y underscore C-A-P-U-C-C-I. The link that we discussed

can be found in the description box. What's up, everyone? And welcome back to the program.

On today's episode, we're going to hear from David Boyz, who represented Virginia Roberts

and who's talking about how strong the evidence was against the joaxotic of the Windsor family.

Now, we all know that Prince Andrew has made this huge push lately about the picture

and how the picture is not real. Well, we also know that all of the receipts have been piled up

against him and disclaims. And when the only person you have out here talking about how innocent you

are is some beat up ass old socialite, you know that you're running out of road.

And if Prince Andrew and his team really thought that this picture of Virginia Roberts and

Prince Andrew was fake, do you really think they would have settled?

Forget all of the noise about how Prince Andrew was forced to settle,

how it had to do with the Jubilee. Forget all of that. And ask yourself, if it was you

and you had evidence that that picture was fake, would you even entertain cutting a deal?

I know I wouldn't. If somebody made these accusations against me, I would fight tooth and nail

to prove that I didn't do what they're saying I did. I certainly wouldn't settle out of court

if I thought that I had evidence that would prove my innocence. And let's not forget that Prince

Andrew had probably the best lawyer in the business when it comes to this sort of case. And

that's Andrew Brettler. So it's not like his counsel was terrible. It's not like he was getting

bad advice. The fact is the evidence was so strong against him. Him and his lawyers took a look at

it and said, you know what? It's in our best interest to just settle. So all this other garbage

we're hearing after the fact is laughable at best. You had your chance to prove your innocence

and you avoided it. And when you cut through all the bullshit, the proof is right there in the pudding.

And that proof is Prince Andrew decided to settle instead of defending himself in open court.

And for me, that tells us the whole story.

Today's article is from the Daily Mail headline. I think the evidence was too strong.

Lawyer for Prince Andrew's sex abuse accuser Virginia Roberts claims Duke of York avoided

going to trial because of that photo of them together. This article was authored by Madeline Ross.

The lawyer representing Prince Andrew's sex abuse accuser Virginia Roberts last night said

there was strong evidence in the case. David Boyz said if US prosecutors had wanted to,

they could have brought more charges against the Duke of York. And there's no doubt that the

prosecutors had the goods on Prince Andrew as well as many other people who were involved with

Jeffrey Epstein, but they chose not to act on it. How many times have we seen it? We have seen

damning evidence come out surrounding people involved with Jeffrey Epstein. And we never see those

people ever get held to account. The lawyer said he thought Andrew avoided court because the photo

of him with the then 17 year old Miss Roberts made him look less credible as a witness as he

maintains that they never met. And that's a fact, right? If they went to court and a jury saw this

picture and an expert came in and looked at the picture, examined it, the experts going to tell

the jury that it's a real picture. And that is the only reason why Prince Andrew decided to

settle your folks. What other reason could there be? And if the picture is fake like Prince Andrew

and his surrogates contend, well, where are the receipts to prove to us that that's the truth?

Should we just take your word for it? All of a sudden you and your friends, the busted up

socialite and the others are photography experts and I should take their word on what's Photoshop

than what's not. Meanwhile, on the flip side of that, we have heard from actual experts who have

told us the picture is authentic and real. So why would I believe anything that the joe exotic of

the Windsor family is yapping about? He paid a rumored 10 million pound settlement to Miss Roberts

last year in a civil case brought against him in the US without accepting liability and maintaining

his innocence and is reportedly trying to challenge the ruling. That would be the biggest mistake

Prince Andrew ever made. Remember, he is still not spoken with the FBI yet. And the FBI has been

pretty adamant that they'd like to speak with Prince Andrew in regards to his relationship

with Jeffrey Epstein and what he might have seen while he was hanging out with Epstein.

But Prince Andrew can't be bothered to come forward and talk about that because, you know, why should he?

Andrew was forced to step away from royal duties in 2019 and is unlikely to take on a formal role

at his brother's coronation as a result of the scandal. All poor Prince Andrew, he can't go out and

play dress up in his little military outfit. Mr. Boyz told Pierce Morgan in an interview on Talk TV

that the controversial photograph of the two together made it clear that he could not say he never

met her credibly. The son reported Mr. Boyz suggested that once a jury had decided that the

Prince's claim that he had never met Miss Roberts was not credible. It would be difficult for them

to believe they had not had sex. And that's a fact. If you're lying about ever meeting somebody

and then a picture is provided that says that you actually did meet, well, what does that do for

your credibility in front of the jury? It absolutely tramples it. You have her testimony and you have

his complete denial. The question is, is he credible or not? The lawyer said he had been disappointed by

the way the case had been handled and suggested that if the Duke of York had been ordinary, more charges

would have been brought against him. 100%. If all of these people who were involved with Jeffrey

Epstein were just run of the mill folks, forget it. They all would have been arrested. All of their

assets would have been seized and the government would have laughed all the way to the bank. But since

it's Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein was rolling around with all those bankers and scumbags

from the financial sector, well, we all know who pays the bills for the politicians.

He could have been prosecuted criminally if prosecutors either had the jurisdiction over him

or wanted to. I think one of the things that was disappointing, how lightly the British prosecutors

and authorities treated this. I don't know whether it was because he was a member of the royal

family or whether he was just wealthy and could afford good lawyers. I'm going to say it's a little

bit of both. And the way that this case was treated in the UK is an absolute embarrassment.

Our justice system in the United States, as well as our justice system in the United Kingdom,

greatly favors people who are well represented. And that's the truth, right? Especially here in

America, it certainly paid a play. And if you have a high power lawyer who has all of those

connections behind the scenes, you're going to have a better chance of getting away with whatever

crime you committed or being found innocent of a crime you're accused of. I think if he had been

an ordinary chap who had done what he did, the prosecutors would have looked at him differently.

When asked if he thought criminal charges would have been brought, the lawyer replied,

it was a distinct possibility. I don't want to say that he would have been charged because

I think you've got to look at what all of the evidence is. I haven't seen enough evidence to

know about criminal charges. Prince Andrew was reportedly assembled, an eight million dollar

war chest to fight the settlement that was agreed with Miss Roberts last year to resolve a civil case.

The disgraced prince is understood to be plotting a comeback that will restore his tarnish

reputation, including possible legal action against his sex abuse accuser Virginia Roberts.

So I'd love to see it, right? If Prince Andrew has the goods, let's see it. All I'm interested in

is the truth. And if Prince Andrew has evidence that proves that he didn't do this,

well, let's see it. But for all of these years and for all of the hubris and all of the big talk,

we have seen no evidence to prove what he is saying. He is also reputed to be searching for new staff

to build up his team as he is a move to America. Boy, that would be hilarious. If Prince Andrew

moves to America, that will be the biggest mistake he has ever made. The furor surrounding the case

led him to being stripped of his honorary military titles and any returns of public life seems

improbable. According to insiders, the Duke of York 62 has been watching Prince Harry and Meghan

Markle's progress across the US very closely. The 62-year-old was stripped of his royal titles

and roles last year, but insiders claim he is less bothered about the situation than people believe.

Oh, I thought he was crying. I thought he was broken up about it. You see, they can't even get

their story straight. So I don't believe anything that has to do with insiders in Prince Andrew's

circle because those insiders are Prince Andrew, Fergie, and like four other people.

A source close to Andrew told the Sun that he has been following the Sussex's journey as he

considers a way to forge a new career. Andrew is seemingly impressed at how Harry and Meghan

were able to set up a new working life away from the royal family in California,

friend said, well, here's the thing. Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are an accused of

dittling people or hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein. Their big crime is, I know this is real

rough to hear, but they didn't want to stay in England. I know that's a terrible crime to commit

and certainly worth all of the headlines that we see on a regular basis. Now flip the script to

Prince Andrew and you tell me that people in America are going to be accepting of that zero chance.

He has a better chance of moving to fucking Mars.

The insider claim he is very interested in business and charity, but unlike his nephew,

would be shying away from the Netflix style projects. The royal is also reportedly reassembling

a team of his own. He has understood to have recently lost his communications officer

of two years. Prince Andrew has reportedly assembled $8 million

war chest to fight the settlement he agreed to with Ms. Roberts last year.

The news comes as it's reported that the prince might be forced to move from the 30 million

pound winds or home. As he tells friends, he cannot afford the upkeep. Aw, poor guy has to move

out of his 30 million pound home because he can't afford the upkeep. You see this right here,

that's me playing the world's smallest violin for him. The Duke said he will effectively be forced

out of royal lodge in April when his annual 249,000 pound grant is slashed. So the dude has a

10 million pound war chest to fight a losing battle over a settlement that he already agreed to.

But meanwhile, he can't afford 249,000 pounds to pay for the royal lodge. Something doesn't compute.

It is understood that the royal lodge where the prince 63 lives with his ex-wife Sarah,

Duchess of York, also 63, requires extensive work. The Duke has told friends he feels he is being

singled out as his other only annual income is a small navy pension. One friend said it feels

as though his brother wishes to evict him. But last night, a source told The Daily Mail,

the claim seems to be based on fears, not full facts. It is understood the king will not leave

him homeless or penniless, but wants Andrew to use his own money to pay for things. I mean,

imagine a grown-ass man 63 years old has to be told to use his own money to pay for things.

Must be nice to just ride the coattails of mommy and your brother for all of these years.

The king is expected to support his brother if he wishes with fears of the Duke being left without

somewhere to live or any money unfounded. He is believed to have guaranteed Andrew an income,

a bit reduced, and the home and is understood to have agreed to pay privately for the Duke's security

estimated at three million pounds a year after the home office acts to Scotland yard protection

officers. Mel online has approached Andrew's representatives for comment. It's interesting here

to see David Boyz talk about that picture and about how the picture was the deciding factor.

That's something I've been saying for quite some time and when you have that kind of evidence,

right, if the evidence is real, if it's solid, that's the kind of evidence that ends these kinds of

cases. Because if the jury takes a look at it and they realize that you've been lying this whole

time, meaning Prince Andrew, your credibility is absolutely shot. And once your credibility is

shot in the courtroom with the jurors, forget it. The game is over and you're going to lose.

Prince Andrew knew that. Andrew Brettler knew that and now that all is said and done. Andrew's

trying to engage in some revisionist history and he's trying to rewrite what happened. Unfortunately

for him, there's a whole lot of us who have been paying attention. All right, folks, that's going

to do it for this one. All of the information that goes with the episode can be found in the

description box.