newscommentarytrue crime

Mega Edition: Day Number 5 Of The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (3/24/26)

The Diddy Diaries·Mar 24, 2026·32:59·failed

About this Episode

The Ghislaine Maxwell trial, held in late 2021 in federal court in New York, centered on her alleged role as Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirator in a sex trafficking ring that preyed on underage girls for over a decade. Prosecutors accused Maxwell of grooming minors, gaining their trust, and then facilitating or participating in their abuse at the hands of Epstein between 1994 and 2004. The government’s case included testimony from four women, some of whom described in painful detail how Maxwell recruited them as teenagers under the guise of mentorship or financial assistance, only to manipulate them into sexual encounters with Epstein. Flight logs, photographs, and household staff testimony were used to place Maxwell at various Epstein properties and show her long-standing involvement in his lifestyle and operations.

Maxwell’s defense team attempted to cast her as a scapegoat, arguing that she was being punished for Epstein’s crimes following his 2019 death in federal custody. They challenged the credibility of the accusers, questioned their motives, and pointed to the time gaps between the alleged crimes and the trial. Ultimately, the jury found Maxwell guilty on five of six federal charges, including sex trafficking of a minor, and not guilty on one count of enticing a minor to travel for illegal sex acts. The conviction marked a rare moment of accountability in a case that had long been plagued by cover-ups, prosecutorial failures, and elite protection. It also opened the door to further scrutiny of Epstein’s network, although many key figures remain untouched.

to contact me:

[email protected]

Hosts & Guests

Bobby Capucci

Host

Transcript

Most people would rather remove a nest of irate hornets

than search for auto and home insurance.

That's why the Zebra searches for you,

comparing over 100 insurance companies

to find savings no one else can.

Compare today at the Zebra.com.

I think I'll wait inside.

Most people would rather tend a corporate team building

workshop than search for auto and home insurance.

Go team, feel that synergy.

That's why the Zebra searches for you,

comparing over 100 insurance companies

to find savings no one else can.

Compare today at the Zebra.com.

Who's ready for the trust fall?

Welcome to the Epstein Chronicles.

Today was the final day of the first week

of the Galan Maxwell trial.

And we saw testimony from three more witnesses.

Now today there was a lot of testimony

that was, excuse me, a lot of the evidence

that was introduced under seal.

And a lot of the evidence that was introduced

during the afternoon portion of this

was visual in nature.

So there's not very much to go on as far as notes

for the duration of the afternoon sessions.

A lot of it was video and different packets

that were prepared for the jurors previously.

And so there's really not too much about that.

Now what we do know about those afternoon back and forth

we're gonna get to for sure.

And obviously Juan Alessi took the stand again today

and he had to face the cross examination

from Galan Maxwell's legal team.

And as you all know, their plan for keeps.

It's a scorched earth policy for Galan Maxwell's legal team.

And the same could be said for the way they went about it today.

They absolutely hammered Alessi on his credibility

and on a few of the other issues that we touched on

previously during his testimony,

such as the theft of the money, attempting to steal

a gun from Epstein, all kinds of wild stuff

that go towards, at the very least,

giving him the appearance of not being a credible witness.

And that's what the defense is looking to do, right?

In every aspect, they're looking to destroy the credibility

of any witness who might paint their client as guilty.

And Juan Alessi, you know, he's not somebody

who I have ever thought of as a decent human being

in this whole entire ordeal.

And him being a witness for the prosecution,

you would think that they would have had him prepared

to stand up a little bit better today.

But overall, I thought it was a relatively decent week

for the prosecution, not great,

but relatively decent week for them.

And I think that the testimony is just gonna get worse

for the defense.

Once the survivors are up on the stand

and they're giving their testimony

and they're telling their stories,

it's going to be very impactful.

And guys like Juan Alessi, well, they just, you know,

they fill in the blanks a little bit, right?

They can corroborate that Golan was the lady of the house,

that Golan was in Epstein's room, 95% of the time,

according to court testimony.

So that puts her at the scene of the crime, right?

And I'm guessing that that was the goal for prosecution.

Now, again, we're talking about somebody

who is not a great human being

and whose credibility can easily be poked at by the defense.

So what it will come down to,

like everything else in this trial,

is what the jury thinks about it.

What does the jury think?

Did the defense make a good enough argument

and put him in such a bad light

that they don't even pay attention to his testimony?

Or do they believe what Mr. Alessi said on the stand?

And, you know, move forward with that thought in their head

as this trial goes along.

And it looks to me, and again, folks,

I am certainly not a lawyer, right?

I'm not a journalist, nothing like that.

But it looks to me like the defense,

I mean, the prosecution is setting the foundation here

for the way that they're going to paint the picture,

bringing these ex-employees,

other people who might have been around as witnesses

to set the scene, and then the testimony

from the survivors themselves,

well, that's the hammer strike, right?

That's when you open up the heavens and let loose.

You build the foundation first,

and then you build the house on top of it.

So I'm guessing that's what the prosecution is doing right now.

But, like I said earlier,

there's a lot of things that were sealed today,

and I'm not a fan of that at all.

For those of you who have listened to my podcast

for the last two and a half years,

you know how I feel about transparency,

especially in cases like this,

when there's been a complete lack thereof.

So I think it's important to have as much transparency

as possible here,

and it was already beyond the pale

that there wasn't a call in line established.

So now you're going to continue to, you know,

play these transparent games,

at least transparency games, I mean,

and keep things sealed as they're being introduced as evidence.

So there was a whole bunch of that today,

not really a big fan, and again,

I'm not in that courtroom, right?

I don't know what the motivations are to keep it sealed.

But I'm working off of the premise

that I'm just tired of transparency,

no transparency in this case, in general.

And it is long beyond time

that this whole entire thing gets aired out,

that more people know what's going on here

or what went on here.

And there are so many people who are interested

in this case now that had no interest in it previously.

I can't tell you how many people I have had contact me

that I'm talking about people in my personal life

who have never really paid attention

to my yelling and screaming from every mountain top

about this, who are now interested in what's going on.

And I say, welcome, right?

I'm not one of these people who's going to deride you

or break your chops.

Hey, look, we're all ignorant until or not, right?

A lot of things I'm ignorant about.

And this case was one of them.

I was ignorant to this whole thing until I wasn't.

So those of you who have just found this case

and this story, look, there's gonna be a whole lot

for you to consume because there's so much more

than what you have been given, what you have been shown,

and even in this trial, what they're talking about.

Remember, this is a small scope of time

that Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell were active.

And this is only a small amount of the girls

who were actually abused by them according to accounts.

So remember, this is, you know,

it's a cliche, the tip of the iceberg,

but this is legitimately the tip of the iceberg.

And I wish that there was more, right?

I wish there was more people on trial here.

I wish that this was a rico case, but it's not that.

The reality is it is what it is.

And hopefully, when all is said and done,

they have enough to prosecute Maxwell

and send her to prison for the rest of her life

because in my opinion,

that's where somebody who does these kinds of things belongs.

So today, the battle was on,

trying to get to a place where she does not have to go

to prison for the rest of her life.

So let's take a look at some of that testimony today.

And what I did was is I compiled it all

and then I put it into more of a digestible format

so that we could read through it

with a little bit less back and forth kind of make it,

I don't know, a little easier to consume

and hopefully a little shorter than the 42 minutes

or so that we've been rocking.

I know it's Friday and people got a lot going on.

Weekend, staring us down the face.

A lot of people want to relax a little bit

and hell, I'm gonna take a day off tomorrow myself.

So I get it.

With that said, I tried to compile this all

and put it into a bit of a digestible format.

We'll see what's up.

All right, so day five of the Maxwell trial.

Before the jury even got into the room,

the sparring had commenced.

Maxwell's lawyer was commenting about seeing

semen on the table could be prejudicial.

The prosecutor responds to this by stating that

it was a white stain and that it was relevant

in proving whether the massages were

or not sexual in nature.

Judge Nathan, she made a ruling that that would be

something that she would have to use lab tests to permit.

So remember, this is all before the jury even got into the courtroom

as per the notes that were coming out.

Prosecution went on to discuss the collection

of Jeffrey Epstein's schoolgirl outfits

and how that is relevant to the larger picture.

Of course, Maxwell's lawyers, well,

they shot back that the collection of outfits

has nothing to do with Maxwell and is prejudicial

against their client.

To that, the prosecution answered that the schoolgirl costumes,

small ones, they made a note of that,

absolutely disgusting animals were found in the massage room,

therefore making them relevant to the case at hand.

And you would think that would be the case, right?

If those schoolgirl outfits were found in the massage room

and we know that that was the room that Galen was

inhabiting according to other witnesses,

then that is certainly something that is relevant

and something that should be discussed.

And Jeffrey Epstein was known to have this collection

of schoolgirl outfits.

We know the stories about how he had one of these survivors

according to her account by a little cotton

like little girl underwear.

We've heard all of the horror stories about this guy.

So why anyone would think that he doesn't have

a collection of schoolgirl outfits is beyond me.

He certainly did, according to all of the accounts

that we have heard.

The defense, well, they changed their tactic

and they were like, you know what,

instead of the relevance of the schoolgirl outfits,

now they're asking that the costumes

not be described as schoolgirl outfits.

So you see what they do here, right?

Technicalities, trying to change their strategy,

mid-argument, and it went from the fact that,

oh, at first they're not relevant to now,

oh, well, let's just change the names.

We can't call them schoolgirl outfits.

That's prejudicial.

And this is the sort of sparring that was going on.

And this is what was going on in the courtroom

before the jury even stepped foot

into the courtroom this morning.

Most people would rather remove a nest of irate hornets

than search for auto and home insurance.

That's why the zebra, such as for you,

comparing over 100 insurance companies

to find savings no one else can,

compared today at the zebra.com.

I think I'll wait inside.

This is Mike Voilo of Lexicon Valley.

And I'm Bob Garfield.

Are you one of those people who sometimes uses words?

Do you communicate or acquire information

with, you know, language?

Hey, us too.

So join us on Lexicon Valley to true over the history, culture,

and many mysteries of English, plus some ice cracks.

Find us on one of those apps where people listen to podcasts.

Hi, I'm Alicia.

And I'm Stacy.

And we make trashy divorces.

Everybody's favorite good podcast about bad relationships.

Looking for something true crimey without the gore

or the body count?

We've been shurning out funny, feisty, feminist episodes

since 2019.

So if you're looking to put some scandalous stories

told well into your ears this summer,

check out trashy divorces.

Wherever you listen to podcasts, trust us.

We've covered someone you love or someone you love to hate.

So the prosecution says that they will just lay a foundation

and then ask the witness about the costumes in question form.

So they were wrangling and trying

to get procedural stuff out of the way

before Judge Nathan either even came into the room.

So Max, right when they start, right when the trial,

I mean, when the hearing commenced, they went right at it.

Maxwell's lawyers, they go in hard right away.

They go right after the fact that he took,

meaning a lessee from $6,300 from Epstein,

and they frame it as such.

You took $6,300.

So they're framing it right away.

They're leaving no question.

They're setting the question up at that they ask him

to leave no doubt.

You took the $6,300 and obviously he says,

yeah, he took it because he did take it, right?

That's not even a question.

So what they're trying to do is set it up

that he is not to be believed.

If he would take $6,300 from somebody,

then why would he be somebody who is credible?

Now remember, that's what the defense is trying to do.

This is a message that they continue to try to hammer home.

They then double down on this by asking him,

if he lied not only once, but twice.

A lessee responds that he didn't lie,

but the defense keeps banging away at it.

Didn't you try to steal a gun?

Didn't you try to steal over $5,000 to pay

for immigration papers for your girlfriend?

Pretty scuzzy line of questioning, right?

Why are you bringing up someone's immigration status

who isn't even involved in the case?

Obviously they'll try and say that was the cause

of a lessee taking the money,

but a lessee responded that it wasn't even his girlfriend.

After this exchange, the defense asks a lessee

if a police officer Dawson questioned him.

A lessee corrects the defense and tells the court

that he was the one who went to speak with officer Dawson.

So what he's saying is nobody had to come find me

to speak with me.

I went and talked to officer Dawson.

I was the one who of my own accord went there

and spoke with him and tried to get it all figured out.

You know, he was attempting to show

that he was doing this on his own

and wasn't in any trouble.

Then the questioning turned to the gun

and the defense asked if he told officer Dawson

that he went to Epstein's to steal a gun

and a lessee says he can't recall.

Now the defense loves that, right?

When you say you can't recall on the stand,

they're gonna try and use that if you misremembering.

They're gonna try and say that you have a terrible memory

and all of this stuff you're saying is incorrect.

But the defense, they won't let up on this fact

and they respond with you might have said

but you don't recall and again, they're trying to frame it.

So the jury sees that his memory is bad

or he doesn't remember correctly.

And that is the strategy.

It's going to be the strategy the whole way through

so just get ready for it.

Once again, the full court assault on his memory

and credibility keeps up by again asking a lessee

if he went back to steal money another time.

To this, a lessee responds that he only did it one time

and he thinks that that's what he told the police.

Once again, he thinks.

So the defense really had a quite the sparring session

with a lessee according to those who were in court

and it was a little tense at times as well.

The defense goes on to describe

how a lessee entered the house via the sliding last door

and swiped $5,600 from a white envelope

in one of Epstein's briefcases.

So a lessee sneaks in through the sliding last door,

takes $5,600 and hits the skids.

The lawyers continue to chip away at his credibility

as they once again ask him about the money that was stolen

and then add that money that was stolen

while a lessee was the owner of,

and then they ask him why that money was stolen

while a lessee was the owner of properties valued

at over $1 million.

So he had property valued at over $1 million

allegedly at this time according to Maxwell's lawyers,

but he still went ahead and stole that money from Epstein

and they're trying to once again frame it as this guy's a thief.

He's a, you know, a no good person

who shouldn't be believed.

He responded that he had sold those properties at the time

and he wasn't in possession of them.

Now, at this point, one of Maxwell's lawyers

says the name of one of the anonymous accusers

inside of the courtroom in open court

and I honestly, look, I don't have any evidence of this

but I honestly doubt it was a mistake.

The whole entire defense has been smarmy from day one

and they have decided to go scorched earth.

So why would this be any different?

Why would this be any different?

So I really hope that Judge Nathan really hammers them

for this.

Judge Nathan admonishes the defense

to abide by her rules and then the prosecution

demanded a sidebar directly after this incident happened.

The sidebar ends, they get back to the questioning

and when the lawyer, Pagliucha, asked about Jane again,

he emphasizes on the name Jane this time,

trying to, you know, like a smart-ass response

to the fact that he called Jane by her name in court

so kind of like a snarky way to say,

oh, Jane, is that what you mean?

So there's another quick back and forth

between Alessia and the defense lawyer

before they call for a break.

Now that's the early session,

the early back and forth, write a quick write-up

about what was going on with Alessia on the stand here

and it was pretty contentious.

That whole entire first portion of it,

no doubt about it, they went hard in the paint on them

and I can only imagine being in the courtroom

what, you know, the way that they built their argument here.

Definitely no holds barred

and it's just going to keep going on.

So I hope that the prosecution is prepared for that

and they're prepared to answer in kind

because this is obviously a no gloves fight, right?

This is a backyard brawl at this point

between the defense and the prosecution.

So I hope the prosecution bites down on their mouthpiece

and comes out swinging

and I think next week's going to be very crucial for the trial.

I think we're going to get more of an idea of which way we're going

and we're going to get more of an idea about, you know,

certain aspects of the prosecution's case moving forward.

So after the lunch break, Alessia is back on the stand

and the questioning turns towards Virginia Roberts

and what Alessia said about her yesterday.

They talk about him driving Maxwell to Mar-a-Lago

to pick up Virginia and what the weather conditions were like.

So again, looking to punch holes in his story.

They were going after the dates,

what the weather conditions were like

and really attempting to, you know, Swiss cheese it up.

The defense was trying to suggest that Maxwell

was there getting a treatment at Mar-a-Lago.

She wasn't there for any draconian purposes.

She wasn't there to recruit any kids.

That's why they were there, they were saying.

And Alessia responded to that by saying

he has no idea about her treatments

or what she was there for, you know, if that's the case.

All he could say is what he saw.

Alessia was also oppressed about Jeffrey Epstein's private life

and he said that Epstein didn't share his private life with him.

They also talked about pictures of Maxwell

that were on the walls

and how Alessia was instructed to take them down

when other women visited.

It was a whole entire package of crazy there, folks.

A whole entire package of effed up twisted way of life.

And all of these people that were around,

they give me the skeeves big time.

There was a bunch of weird behavior

by Epstein and Maxwell throughout their time together.

When asked why he had taken them down, his answer was,

I have no idea.

And they wouldn't share that with them, right?

They're not going to say to the hired hell,

hey, look, this is why I want you to take these pictures down.

Epstein and Maxwell weren't the kind of people

who want to have a discussion with the hired hell.

They give orders and you better jump to it

or they'll find somebody to do that for them.

There was questions asked by the prosecution,

also about foreign people who visited the properties

including those with accents,

and Alessia said that there were plenty of different accents

including, but not limited to,

English, French, and Italian accents.

We all know that Jeffrey Epstein thought he was this jet-setter.

We all know that he had contacts all over the world.

This was intercontinental.

This wasn't just in the United States of America.

This was happening all over the world.

And all of these people with all of these accents

come into Jeffrey Epstein's house.

How many of them were at levers of power?

Well, I'm guessing most of them.

Because Jeffrey Epstein didn't just hang out with regular people.

Him and Golan Maxwell, they only paled around with people

that could advance them and their agenda.

Now the prosecution starts in again on Alessia

about arranging massages for Epstein

at the breakers in Palm Beach.

And then they smack him with this one.

They ask him if him arranging massages for Epstein

at the breakers made him a trafficker also.

Which is garbage.

Those massages are at a real joint, right?

He's setting them up at a real joint to go get a massage.

Having these girls, 14, 15, 16, 17,

whatever it is, come to your house to give you a massage.

These aren't massage therapists.

These kids haven't even passed driver's ed in some cases.

These are kids that should be at cheer practice

or whatever the hell it is kids are doing these days.

So to try and conflate the two issues,

I mean, that's just crazy, honestly.

But that's the way that they're going to roll.

And whatever chance that the defense sees

to poke a hole in the armor,

to poke a hole in the prosecution's case,

they're going to go full bore and try and do it.

But this was a pretty, pretty shitty way to go about it, right?

Attacking people this way.

But it's the nature of the beast.

When he was asked if he thought that the people

sent a perform on Epstein's sessions were of age,

unless he responded that he believed they were.

He better respond that way, right?

Or else he is putting himself in a position

of enabling it and facilitating it.

Oh yeah, I thought they were on the rage,

but I just turned the blind eye.

Meanwhile, we know that's what most of these people were doing.

We've heard about the young Swedish girl

who was crying her eyes out.

Yeah, we've heard all the stories, Mr. Alessie.

And while some people might not be hip

to what went on with this dude, well, you know,

the fact of the matter is this.

I say it all the time.

There really are no good guys in this Epstein's Maxwell saga.

Plenty of dark characters and gray people.

The defense went on to ask about any situation

where Alessie heard saw or thought someone was in distress

while on the property, Alessie said no.

Paglioga then asked if anyone complained to him

and Alessie says no, but he wishes that they had

because then he would have been able to stop it.

Bro, really?

You didn't have any idea what was going on?

Got girls coming to stay the night

over at Old Jeffie's house and just all good.

No questions asked.

Anything to make sure that paycheck cash is right?

So that was pretty much the deal with Alessie.

And after this line of questioning,

he stepped down and there was no redirect.

So that concluded the cross examination of Juan Alessie.

And then the next witness was Gregory Parkinson,

a crime scene investigator from Palm Beach County

who had worked on the Epstein case the first time around.

Now this is the portion of the testimony

where a lot of the stuff was visual and digitized.

So there's really not too much to go on.

There's a little bit, right?

And we're going to get to it.

But the overall scenario is them talking about

the first raid of Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach home

during the original prosecution back in 2007, 2008.

And Jeffrey Epstein, obviously,

made the sweetheart deal, got the hook up

and didn't do any real jail time.

But the actual investigation into Epstein and Palm Beach

was a pretty thorough investigation.

And they were absolutely hamstrung by the state prosecutors,

meaning the police department, by the state prosecutors,

and then the feds on top of it.

I'm going to post a few episodes this weekend,

going into a little bit more about the situation

as far as how hard the Palm Beach Police Department worked

and how badly they wanted to put Epstein in prison,

and how they were just stopped in their tracks

pretty much the whole way.

So this gentleman that they're talking to on the stand now,

Gregory Parkinson, is a crime scene investigator

who used to work for the Palm Beach Police Department,

but he's now retired.

He worked on the Epstein investigation,

and now, as he's on the stand,

the prosecution enters all kinds of evidence into the record,

but obviously the press in the public were not privy to it.

It's under seal.

At one point, Maureen Komi asked,

what do we see here during the search,

and Officer Parkinson responded,

Epstein and the Pope,

meaning a picture of Epstein and the Pope.

There was also a picture of Epstein and Fidel Castro,

and a litany of other people.

I'm not going to get into it here,

but throughout the years,

we have talked about so many different pictures

that were found at Epstein's house

that were predominantly and prominently displayed.

Hi, I'm Alicia, and I'm Stacey,

and we make Trashy Divorce's Everybody's Favorite Good Podcast

about bad relationships.

Looking for something true crimey

without the Gore or the Body Count?

We've been shurning out funny, feisty, feminist episodes since 2019,

so if you're looking to put some scandalous stories

told well into your ears this summer,

check out Trashy Divorce's,

wherever you listen to podcasts.

Trust us, we've covered someone you love,

or someone you love to hate.

The prosecution continues to instruct the jurors

on what sealed items to look at,

one after the other.

Comey then asks that exhibit 234 be admitted

under seal of course,

and then some exhibits are for the public.

Exhibit 228, for example,

is one of those,

and Comey asks Officer Parkinson

what 228 contains,

and he responded that it's the garden room.

Mega Edition: Day Number 5 Of The Ghislaine Maxwell Trial (3/24/26)

About this Episode

Hosts & Guests

More from The Diddy Diaries

Diddy And His Quest To Have Evidence And Testimony By Victim 2 (Jane Doe) Exclud...

Prosecutors Say That Victim Number 3 Has Vanished And She Might Not Testify Ag...

Victim Number 2 AKA Jane Doe And The Uphill Battle To Remain Anonymous

Allegations That 'Victim 3' Was Paid Off And Suge Knight Has Some Advice For Did...