Mega Edition: Kash Patel And His Version Of Epstein "Truth" (3/25/26)

They keep telling you that the Jeffrey Epstein story is finished, that it was investigated,

that it was handled.

But here's the part that they never explained, why the charges were so narrow, when the

conduct was so broad.

How does a man with multiple properties, private aircraft, international travel, and a documented

pipeline of victims get treated, like a lone offender?

Why were logistics treated as background noise, instead of evidence?

Why were facilitators, reduced to footnotes, instead of defendants?

Well, that's where we come in.

The Epstein Chronicles exists, because those questions were never answered.

This podcast breaks down what the public record actually shows.

The deals that kept exposure, the decisions that limited scope, and the moments where prosecutors

chose restraint, overreach.

If you ever wondered why this case feels unfinished, why accountability stopped at the perimeter,

or why so many names remain officially invisible, you've come to the right place.

Welcome to the Epstein Chronicles.

What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles.

So Cash Patel, Mr. Val Hallow himself, was in front of the Senate today, and according

to him, Jeffrey Epstein didn't traffic any girls to anyone else, but himself, and

isn't it convenient that any time we have a situation like this, as far as a bunch of

questions that are unanswered, whether it be the Las Vegas shooting, or Jeffrey Epstein,

it always turns into, well it was just a lone wolf.

There was nobody else there, there was nobody else involved, it was just this one guy with

some proclivities, and that's it.

Now listen, if you want to believe that, and you think that's what's going down, and

that we're getting the whole truth, then cool, believe it.

But me personally, I've seen this story play out one too many times, we've seen this

movie, and we all know the ending.

And I don't know how anyone could possibly sit here and think that we're getting the

whole last story from Mr. Patel, we most certainly aren't.

And for me, it's just another link in the chain of the overall cover up that we're witnessing,

and they can try and gaslight until the fucking cows come home, but it's not going to change

the fact that we're being bullshitted.

And if Mr. Patel wants to shut all of us up, release the files, shut us all up, I'll

gladly eat that crow.

I'll come on the podcast, and I'll eat that shit, and enjoy every minute of it, because

if you think I enjoy talking about this daily, every day for six years, you have a fucking

other thing coming.

I'd much prefer to talk about other things.

I'd much prefer to talk about sports, geopolitics, history, all kinds of stuff.

But one thing that I've learned in my 45 years of life is about 80% of the time I do

what I have to do, 20% of the time I do what I want to do.

So here we are once again, talking about how we're all being dog walked and bullshitted,

and considering the messaging coming from the DOJ and the FBI, I guess here we'll be sitting

for quite some time.

Because let me be very clear, until they release these files, until we have transparency,

we're going to be talking about this story, and look, I have nothing to sell any of you.

I don't have any kind of, you know, product that I'm pushing, besides whatever ads come

with the actual host, the platform here, I don't have anything to sell anybody.

In fact, the same shit we're talking about here is the same shit I'd be talking about

in the backyard with my friends.

They're just tired of hearing me say it, so here we are.

And as long as they continue to deny the existence of evidence that we know exists, then

not only is the story not going anywhere, the fallout becomes more radioactive because

the cover-up gets deeper, and every time you gaslight us, every time you obfuscate, every

time you make pretend this didn't happen, it becomes more apparent that it was never

about truth, it was never about justice, it was all about political theater, political

rhetoric, and trying to win votes while you were on the campaign trail.

And if you got a problem with that, well, it seems like you should be talking to Cash

Patel, the man that made all these great promises, and delivered none.

Today's article is from the Daily Mail and the headline, Cash Patel claims no evidence

Jeffrey Epstein, traffic girls to anyone, but himself.

Yeah, no Rico, no other co-conspirators, this was a lone wolf, and all he did was

diddle girls all day every day, nobody had any idea there was no structure in place.

Nobody was out here recruiting girls for him, Jean-Luc Brunel never had girls traffic

to him from Jeffrey Epstein.

No that never happened.

Jean-Luc Brunel never traffic girls to Jeffrey Epstein either, right?

No underage girls.

No, that never happened.

There weren't girls living with Jeffrey Epstein that were being trafficked from other

countries.

No, that never happened, right?

Oh, wait, it all did happen.

Well, somebody might want to tell Cash Patel, you know, the guy who sits at the head of

the organization that likes to arrest people for lying to them.

This article was authored by Caitlin Correll.

FBI director Cash Patel said the bureau has no proof that Jeffrey Epstein traffic girls

to anyone other than himself.

How the fuck does someone traffic girls to themselves?

Wouldn't that just be somebody who's abusing girls?

Fucking stupid, so dumb, they think you're dumb, that's really what it comes down to.

And right now they're counting on everybody's emotions being charged, over Charlie Kirk,

and I get it.

I absolutely get it.

What happened was horrendous, and the celebrations that followed, absolutely terrible.

And it really pulled the mask off a lot of people.

But with that said, we're not getting distracted here.

We're going to keep them moving.

I can be outraged and disgusted by the behavior of people in the aftermath of Charlie's death,

and still keep my eye on the prize.

That doesn't buy Cash Patel, and he kind of passed from me.

He still has a job to do, right?

Now, of course, I'm more in the fact that his friend is dead.

That's terrible.

Nobody should go through that.

As somebody who has seen one of their friends get their head blown off right in front

of them, I get it, not fun, not good.

But we have to be adults here.

We have to separate the bullshit from what's real.

And at the end of the day, my job is the whole power to account.

And that's what I'm going to continue to do, even if it's uncomfortable.

After claiming that he has reviewed a large chunk of the files related to the disgraced

finance here, and convicted child sex offender, Patel said that the FBI lacks the evidence

it needs to bring charges against anyone else.

You've seen most of the files, who, if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young women to

besides himself?

Secretary John Kennedy asked Patel during his Senate Judiciary hearing on Tuesday.

Why don't you go and take a look at the USVI lawsuit against JP Morgan?

Why don't you take a look at the lawsuit file by the survivors under the Biden administration

by the way when it comes to the FBI and Merrick Garland, you know, that nobody did shit

about the whole entire narrative that's being created here is straight up crazy.

And if they think they're going to get away with rewriting history, they have another

thing coming.

There is no credible information, none, if there were, I would bring the case yesterday

that he trafficked to other individuals, Patel replied, so I guess Maria Farmer is lying.

I guess all the other girls are lying, Virginia's lying, all the other girls that have come

forward and said, look, this is what went down.

And please remember, some people might try and conflate what Epstein was doing as this

giant trafficking ring, but we've talked about the difference of what Epstein was up to.

And that's what they're banking on.

They're banking on the fact that you don't understand that you think it's all just the

same thing, right?

Oh, it's Heidi Fleiss.

That never happened.

Nobody was paying.

Nice try, Cash Patel, we're not buying it.

And the sad truth is, these senators aren't well versed enough to really dig down and

get to the truth.

So they're stuck looking like, let's just say it, a bunch of boobs.

So the answer is, no one, they're a public insider pressed for the information that we have

in the case file, Patel affirmed, whatever that means, we easily ask lawyers speak, whatever

we have, what's in the case file, yes or no answer, Mr. Patel.

Do you have it or don't you?

He insisted, I'm not saying that others were not trafficked and others were not involved.

What I am telling you is that based on the information that we have, we have released

all credible information.

What does that mean, credible information?

So according to who, according to the people that are telling you not to release this,

credible how, and you see, this is why I'm calling for a special investigator.

We have to have a special prosecutor here to get down to the bottom of this.

And I know a lot of people don't want to hear that shit, but I'm sorry.

This is unacceptable, completely unacceptable, especially considering we have this guy,

Cash Patel, who was on the campaign trail, banging the word, drums about Jeffrey Epstein,

oh, the next day we're releasing the list, I've seen it, I know, all of a sudden you

didn't see it, you didn't know.

So you're a liar, is that what you're telling us?

I know that's not going to satisfy many, many, many people, but tell admitted, look man,

I'm not going to sit here and tell you I take joy, blast in Cash Patel, I don't know

the dude, I don't have an axe to grind against Cash Patel.

But I will tell you this, I don't like being lied to and I don't like being gaslit.

And there's a lot of people that through their support behind this administration for

this exact reason to get to the bottom of what Epstein was up to.

So you have yourself to blame when people are criticizing you and when people now are

asking you the hard questions.

And at this point, in my opinion, Cash Patel has proven that he's nothing more than a

forked tongue politician like the rest of them.

Like I always tell you folks, meet the new boss, Sam is the old boss.

Would it surprise anybody if Cash Patel unzipped his face and it was Christopher Array hanging

out underneath there like an episode of Scooby Doo?

I mean, come on at this point, would that really shock anybody?

The FBI director explained that since the original search warrants from then US attorney for

the Southern District of Florida, Alex Acosta were limited.

There are no people named in the files that participated in Epstein's ex-trafficking ring.

Well, here's the problem, Mr. Patel.

We want that NPA done away with and the DOJ, they can do it.

So if you really cared about that and how the deal came into place, let's get cracking.

We don't have to wait for nobody else.

This lines up with the July 7th, 2025 memo from the FBI and justice department that concluded

that there was no so-called client list of Epstein's co-conspirators.

Well, that's true.

There never was a client list.

Things like this, breaking news, they don't keep client lists.

I know.

I know.

Tough to come to that conclusion, right?

A fuck inspiring doesn't keep a list on Excel for you to find.

The memo also stated that no one else would be charged in connection to Epstein's crimes.

Well, no shit, they're paying the bills.

Can have JP Morgan upset, right?

Can have Deutsche Bank upset?

Can have Howie Letnik upset?

Can have Peter Teal upset?

Can have any of these people mad?

They're the ones that really run the country, make no fucking mistake.

And if you think it's just this administration, you have not been paying attention.

Well, Obama have like 100 different people from the financial sector, part of his cabinet

and shit, give me a break already.

Meanwhile, these same people laugh all the way to the bank as you're getting nailed with

the poor people tax and ban 35% APR rates.

widespread public outcry ensued with the public demanding that the federal government

release the names of anyone named in the files.

But Patel confirmed at an FBI oversight hearing on Tuesday that his agency does not have

in its possession any files that include names of those to whom Epstein traffic women,

including minors.

Senator Kennedy said that his answers on Tuesday will not satisfy Americans and press them

to do more.

This issue is not going to go away, Kennedy said, and I think the central question for

the American people is this.

They know that Epstein traffic young women, for sex, to himself.

They want to know who, if anyone else, he traffic these women too.

And that's a very fair question.

I want to know that answer, the Senator added, and I think you're going to have to do more

to satisfy the American people's understandable curiosity in that regard.

Patel replied, I agree, Senator, well, yeah, words are wind, homie, let's see some action.

Look, I would love to get on this podcast and say to you, yo, cash, Patel, this dude's

a G pro was banging out in the paint and did the right thing went into the FBI and told

everybody that this is the deal.

This is what we're doing.

This is what I want, but that's not reality.

So if you're looking for a fantasy, if you're looking for bullshit, there's plenty of people

selling you that, but this is too important to play games with.

This is too important not to be direct about, say what the fuck you mean and mean what

the fuck you say.

And if you don't, then you should expect that people are going to hold you to account

or at the very least criticize the way you're doing things.

And that's where we're at now, right?

And make no mistake, the legacy media will tell you that it's just one side of the aisle

criticizing cash, Patel or criticizing the administration, but it's not.

There's a lot of people that are very upset by this and a lot of people who know they're

being lied to and frankly, Senator Kennedy knows that we're being lied to as well.

That's why he said what he did.

And cash, Patel, that's why he admitted that he agrees that he needs to do better.

They all do.

And until that day arrives, me, my big mouth and this podcast will be right here.

All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.

That's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles.

Cash Patel has always been a walking billboard for everything wrong with a political hype

machine.

The guy talks like he's some hard and warrior who's been through hell and back when really

he's just another suit playing dress up.

Every time he opens his mouth, it's like watching someone rehearse lines they practiced

in the mirror before going on Fox News.

I mean, you could practically hear the producer in his earpiece, telling him when to squint,

when to smirk and when to pretend he's about to drop a truth bomb.

And the crowd eats it up because they're desperate for someone, anyone to finally stop

lying to them, except that he's not the guy and he's never been.

He's just another actor, reading a script written by the same old hands that have been

lying to us forever.

And every time he pretends to be the hero, he proves he's really just another cog in

the machine.

The whole day one release, the Epstein files act was honestly embarrassing and hindsight.

He said it like he was delivering a trailer for the next Marvel movie.

That smug little grin like he was walking around holding the nuclear launch codes in

his pocket, Glenn Beck hyping him up like they had just unlocked the arc of the covenant.

And for what?

For the same tired political theater that we've been choking on for years, they dangle hope

in front of people who actually give a damn about justice and then yank it away like

the fishermen yank in the dollar away in the old Geico commercials.

They played survivors, they played the public, they played everyone who wanted the truth.

And then what happened when the time came to put action behind the talk?

Nothing.

Absolutely nothing.

The guy who was pounding his chest and yelling about transparency suddenly turns into

a church mouse when he's asked any real questions.

Catherine Harrage asked him a real question.

Suddenly he couldn't commit.

Suddenly he needed to review the situation and console legal channels and be responsible.

Responsible after you promised the world, you were going to rip the doors off the vault?

That is the exact blueprint of fraud.

Talk big when there's nothing at risk, shrink into a corner when someone demands an answer

that can't be cushioned by applause.

And the worst part?

He did it with that same little smirk like he thought nobody noticed the switch.

Like we were all too stupid to catch on.

Like we're just background extras in the movie of his life.

But of course people did notice and they're pissed because you don't get to run around

pretending you're some champion of truth and then fold when it matters most.

You don't get to use the Epstein survivors as props for tough guy branding and then

ghost the second you're asked for commitment.

And look it's not just about cash but tell like I've been telling you for a long time.

Bro is just a symptom of the bigger disease.

The whole entire Trump orbit is packed with these cosplay soldiers who play Patriots

on TV until they're actually asked to do something real.

Every last one of them melts like cheap chocolate when the lights get bright.

They all swear they're going to drain the swamp while bathing in the swamp water like

it's holy oil.

It's a never ending parade of fakes because let's be honest here.

If they wanted the Epstein files released they would have released them already.

Trump could have done it with the stroke of a pen and didn't.

Patel could have stood firm and didn't.

Instead they're all hiding behind excuses like scared interns who forgot their homework.

Meanwhile hundreds of survivors and the public are waiting for real accountability and keep

getting slapped in the face by the atrix.

So when people ask how can anyone trust cash Patel the answer is simple.

You can't.

And you shouldn't.

That's because he backtracks every time it counts.

If anything he's a mascot for the whole clown show.

The face of empty promises dressed up as a rebellion, a hollow drum, loud as hell, but

nothing on the inside.

And when the chips are down they always protect themselves and their bosses first.

You saw it the second he refused to commit to full disclosure, that wasn't hesitation,

that was obedience, that was loyalty to power and to Trump instead of loyalty to the truth.

And that's the real problem.

Not just Patel, but a system that trains people to lick boots instead of stand up.

So yeah the cover up is alive and well and it's bipartisan and it's protected by every

single smiling fraud who goes on TV pretending to give a damn.

Patel is just the latest mascot for the great American con job.

And the more they talk, the clearer it gets that none of them are ever going to save us.

Because at the end of the day it's not incompetence, it's strategy, it's deliberate, it's coordinated.

And every time someone like Cash Patel backpedals, it confirms what we already know.

They're terrified of what is actually in those files.

Today's article is from Newsweek and the headline, Epstein Files, Massie accuses Patel of

troubling deflection on release.

This article was authored by Shane Croucher, Republican representative Thomas Massie,

who spearheaded the petition that led to the House vote on the full release of the Jeffrey

Epstein files, accused FBI director Cash Patel of a troubling deflection when answering

whether the administration would meet its 30 day deadline to make those documents public

and there's no way that they're going to meet the deadline.

We're not getting all these files, are you crazy?

There's going to be excuses, there's going to be reasons why.

And of course they're going to say, well, this is national security.

We have to make sure that we're protecting the country.

That opens up a whole last other conversation though.

How could Jeffrey Epstein and his trafficking ring have anything to do with national security

if he wasn't an asset?

Somebody needs to explain that and they need to explain it with crayons like on five years

old, obviously, because I have no idea how anyone on the planet can try and frame Jeffrey

Epstein's bullshit as national security if he wasn't an asset.

Massie and a post on X was reacting to an interview with Patel by the journalist Catherine

Harridge, who asked him directly if the FBI would meet the deadline, Patel replied that

the FBI and the Department of Justice are committed to producing what they could lawfully, legally

and cited court orders that prohibit the disclosure of information.

I mean, what?

A bunch of jargon, a bunch of nonsense, a bunch of BS, what he really means is you're

not getting shit and that's the end of it.

They're going to do their very best to make sure that this order is not follow through

with.

Now they're going to give some documents, of course, right?

But I have a lot of doubts about this administration following through with anything that they

say they're going to do.

The congressman from Kentucky named the FBI's FD302 forms, which summarized interviews with

witnesses as of particular interest.

Massie who believes that there are previously unknown names of individuals related to the

Epstein case within those forms said the victim's names could be redacted from them before

they're released.

Well, yeah, that's what we should be doing.

The 302s are very important.

It shows us who was being talked to, who wasn't being talked to, and what kind of investigation

was being kicked off behind the scenes.

And we all know that they weren't doing the right thing because if they were, there

would have been a lot more arrests.

This would have been Rico.

And that's a whole other conversation that we're definitely going to get into.

If Jeffrey Epstein wasn't an asset, this would have been a Rico case.

There is no doubt about it.

And when you talk to lawyers, they'll tell you the same thing.

I mean, look at how they tried to do Diddy.

And there's no doubt that Diddy should be in prison.

But was he running a Rico operation, at least in comparison to what Epstein was doing?

We're talking about apples and fucking chicken palmajon here, very different things.

And if anyone should have been charged with Rico, it's Jeffrey Epstein Newsweek contacted

Massie's office and the FBI via email outside of normal business hours for comment.

People business hours, what the FBI's closed, they take some time off.

The wonder shits all screwed up.

Epstein, a former friend of U.S. President Donald Trump, was a wealthy and well-connected

finance here, convicted of child sex offenses.

He maintained an elite network of powerful contacts across politics, business, law, and

academia, even after his conviction.

Epstein died by suicide, allegedly, in his New York City jail cell in 2019 while awaiting

trial.

Survivors of Epstein's abuse believe that the government has kept hidden the full extent

of what it knows about his activities and with whom, leaving many unanswered questions.

The Trump administration pledged full transparency of the Epstein files but delays to their release

and the president playing down their significance, frustrated his supporters who suspect a cover-up.

Well, yeah, how could you not suspect a cover-up?

I mean, on what planet are you living, where any of this is okay, where any of this is acceptable?

Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act on November 19th the same day it passed the Senate.

Trump clashed with Massey over the House petition that led to the act before backing down

and telling Republicans to vote for it when it became clear that the bill would pass anyway.

Imagine trying to take credit for this if you're Trump the way he did.

What a clown, bro. You didn't even want these files to be released, but all of a sudden,

well, I told a lot of Republicans, no, you were getting Molly Watt, bro.

You didn't have any votes. Well, maybe one, but besides that, nobody wants to put a no-down

for something like this. And I think people are coming around to the fact that Trump is a lame duck,

something I've been talking about for a while now. And when you're a part of the insider baseball

of politics, you know what that means for a congressman, you know what it means for everybody else.

They're looking for the next thing, the next guy, they're looking to make sure that they're not

going to go down with the ship, if you will. And that's why you see a lot of the people who are

breaking with Trump when it comes to Congress in the Senate, that's why you're seeing it.

Because they don't want to be caught with that hot potato when the music stops.

You know, Trump isn't going to be on the ticket next time most of these people run.

So they're starting to think about the future. And that's the good thing.

It's passage at the clock ticking on a 30-day deadline for attorney general,

Pam Bondi, to make publicly available and assertable and downloadable format,

all-on-classified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in the possession

of the Department of Justice, the various Epstein investigation files per the act.

And there's going to be tons and tons of files that we're not going to get any sort of look at.

Wait and see, if you think we're going to get transparency here, you're going to be sorely mistaken,

because there's no transparency coming. Not in the sense that a lot of people think it might be

coming. But this is going to be the first time that the Justice Department slow locked in order

from Congress. The act gives the DOJ some grounds for withholding certain files or information

within them, such as anything that identifies a victim or a child witness, images that show injury,

abuse, or death, or details that would jeopardize an active federal investigation, or a prosecution.

When Heritage asked Patel on her straight to the point show if the deadline would be met,

he replied, we're working with our partners at the DOJ to produce, as we have always committed

to producing, what we can lawfully, legally produce. That sure is a change from the whole

day one release. We're going to have a day one release here. We're going to have all the

upstein files released. The day I become so and so man, shut up. Just shut up.

And they're out here crying about Comey. Talk about two peas in a pod, Comey and Patel.

And that's the best we can do as a country for the FBI. People like that.

We're cooked folks. I hate to say it, but we're cooked.

And at this point, we have to ask ourselves, are these institutions even worth saving?

Because as far as I can see, a lot of them aren't. And we will continue to meet those metrics,

Patel continued reminding the public that there are court orders that are in place,

protective orders orders to seal in place that legally prohibit the disclosure of information

related to any investigation when there's a court order of that fashion. So we're working with

the DOJ to see if we can produce anything more. In other words, they don't want to produce anything.

They want court orders. They want to make sure that everything gets bogged up so that they can

run the clock out. I've told you this from the very beginning, they're counting on you giving up,

on you being exhausted, on you saying, you know what, there's nothing we can do,

we're never going to have transparency. We might as well pack it in. That's what they're hoping for.

And what I'm hoping for is that you don't give it to them because guess what,

look what's already been accomplished with the pressure campaign that we've put on them.

And so now is not the time to back off. Now's the time to hit the gas. All right, everybody,

that's going to do it for this one. And I know a lot of people out there aren't big fans of

commercials and ads and I get it. I'm not either. So if you want to get rid of those ads,

you can head over to speaker where the podcast is hosted and join the supporters club.

And once you do that, then those ads, they go away. And that's a new feature that has been added

by speaker. So if that's something you're interested in, you can head over to speaker and check

it out. As far as the information that goes with this episode, you can find that in the description box.

What's up, everyone? And welcome to another episode of the Epstein Chronicles.

When Cash Patel got up in front of Congress and told Congress under oath that Jeffrey Epstein

never traffic girls to anyone else, I knew good and well that the fix was in because it doesn't

take much to know that Jeffrey Epstein most certainly was trafficking young girls. And I think that

the more emails that come out, the more information that becomes available, the more obvious that

becomes. I mean, just take Jess Staley, for example, a couple of weeks before Jess Staley ends up

going to Epstein's island. Epstein is asking some unnamed girl to go get a snow white outfit.

Well, after Jess Staley goes to the island, he sends Epstein an email asking Epstein to say hi

to snow white for him. So who was snow white? And what was Jess Staley up to while he was on that

island? And that's just one example. There are many, many examples such as that.

And the fact that Cash Patel got up there and told everybody that there was nothing to see here,

that there was no trafficking going on and that it was just one sick degenerate with his helper,

Glent Maxwell is not only absurd, but it's also perjury. And I think that this new information that's

coming out these new emails and these new connections really shine the spotlight on the fact that

Cash Patel perjured himself. And I think there needs to be consequences for that as well. Will there

be? I highly doubt it, but there should be this article was published by the Guardian and the

headline new Epstein files reveal he may have trafficked girls to others despite official denials.

This article was authored by Victoria Becampus. The disclosure of more than three million

files related to Jeffrey Epstein suggests that other men were involved in his sexual abuse,

prompting questions about official contentions that there is an evidence to investigate third parties

for potential involvement in the late financiers crimes. That's because it would expose institutional

corruption and that's what they can't have. That's what they're fighting tooth and nail to defend

here. They know that their behavior during this whole entire ordeal was not above word. And they

know that if the American people really find out the scope of not only Epstein's operation,

but the fact that Epstein was being protected by people within the government that it's going to

be a wrap. And that's why they're willing to burn whatever credibility they have left,

trying to pull off this cover up. But the problem is nobody buys it.

And the more information that becomes public, the worse the DOJ ends up looking.

Some newly released documents contain allegations that Epstein provided victims to other men.

Documents released in prior disclosures as well as Epstein and as a complicit Elaine Maxwell.

One accuser said that Maxwell told her that Epstein had to leave his house,

but that there was a friend staying who she could massage. During this encounter, this associate

allegedly offered her money if she engaged in sex. The woman alleged that she did so,

and that this friend paid her money. A prosecution memorandum dated January 26,

2021, and signed by assistant U.S. attorneys from the Southern District of New York,

described the encounter and said that the woman's lawyers showed her a photo of

disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein. She identified him as this man. The names of the U.S.

attorneys are redacted. And that's something I really don't like. I don't like that the attorney

names are redacted. These are public officials. These are people that are being paid by our tax

dollars. Why are they being hidden? Why are they being protected? They should have to stand up and

defend what they've done. Why they make the decisions they made. Why didn't you charge this one?

Why did you charge that one? What made you decide not to go after this one?

But if we don't have the names, how can we hold anyone accountable? And of course, that's the point

because if you hold one person accountable, then you have to hold the whole system accountable.

And that's why the guards who snoozed when Epstein was dying allegedly. That's why they got off

because it would have been a gigantic disaster for the DOJ and the Bureau of Prisons

to go through a trial and have everything exposed. It's not clear to what extent authorities

investigated these allegations. Weinstein was never charged for any conduct related to Epstein.

I highly doubt there was any kind of investigation.

The last thing they want to do is blow this story up any more than it's been blown up.

And that was the case back then too. That's why the scope was so narrow when they charged Maxwell

and when they charged Epstein originally. They could have went so much further. I mean, just take a

look at how they charged Diddy. Look at all the Rico predicates they hit him with. You mean to tell

me that Diddy was running a criminal empire? That rival Epstein's? I'm sorry, but that's not the

case. I covered that Diddy trial, that Diddy case, down to the last day. We went through all the

court documents and it was nothing like what Epstein was up to. Nothing.

But they hit Diddy with Rico. They hit Arkelly with Rico. They hit Keith Rayniri with Rico.

They've hit every single Italian person in history who has ever committed a crime with Rico.

But not Jeffrey Epstein, Nakalaine Maxwell, ask yourself why?

One document and FBI presentation that appears to have been created sometime after late 2025

described an allegation that Epstein told an accuser to give Harvey Weinstein a massage

during which Weinstein tells her to take off her shirt. She refuses and then Weinstein threatens

to get women to come forcer too. So I don't put that past Harvey Weinstein's disgusting ass to you.

We all know he's a gross fuck too. So I have no doubt that he was making demands and we also

know that he was friends with Jeffrey Epstein for a very long time. Supposedly they fell out

because of a situation exactly like this. It had to do with a girl and Weinstein went too far

and that led to him and Epstein breaking off their friendship, at least according to the reports

at the time and so now circle him back. It all looks like that was true. Weinstein, who was in

jail after being convicted of sexual assault and was one of the most prominent targets of the Me Too

movement, rejects Miss Kondo claims. Harvey denies this. The document cited is an internal prosecution

memorandum in the Maxwell case that records allegations not findings. His rep said, Mr. Weinstein

was never charged, investigated or proceeded against in connection with Epstein or the conduct

referenced and no one has made findings supporting those claims. That's the biggest problem. Don't

these people get it? The fact that people are out here saying, oh, well, he wasn't found to be,

bitch, he wasn't investigated. That's the problem. That's where the big issue is. There was never

a real investigation into what was going on. And of course, that's all by design.

The idea was just to give you enough, enough red meat for you to stop asking questions.

Finance here, Leon Black is listed on a page titled prominent names contained in the FBI

presentation about the Epstein case. It's not known who this presentation was for and the

slideshow does not state that authorities verified any claims against these men. Black has adamantly

denied wrongdoing. Well, there is an email out there where Jeffrey Epstein reaches out to some

dude in Russia and asked that dude for help. One of the ministers or something. I don't know

his exact title off the top of my head, but he reaches out to him and he tries to get help

about a Russian girl who's threatening to sue some billionaire. And again, when you go back

and you add it all up and tie it together, he's obviously talking about Guzel Ganiyava.

And what he does is he reaches out to this Russian dude trying to get help to get her to shut up.

And it's chilling because we all know how things go in Russia, right? He reaches out to insert

Russian oligarch here. And before you know it, the person that is being quote unquote talk to

now has their jaw wired shut or something worse, you know, they might take a tumble from a window,

something like that. But the fact that Jeffrey Epstein was willing to reach out to the contact in

Russia the way he did for Leon Black tells you everything you need to know. And you wonder why Leon

Black was given Epstein so much money under Black's name, the document sites allegations that Epstein

told name redacted to give Black a massage while Black was naked. An accuser stated another female

gave Black a massage and made her perform oral sex. One document in this tranche said that the

Manhattan District Attorney's office began looking at allegations against Leon Black. Never going to

happen. Unfortunately, he's too powerful. He has too much money. And did I mention that his son

is part of the Trump administration? Oh yeah, there's that fact as well.

Anybody who knows anything about Apollo global understands just how powerful Leon Black is.

And there is zero chance that Donald Trump's justice department is ever going to go after Leon Black.

Black has not been charged criminally in relation to Epstein. One civil case against him was

dismissed and one was withdrawn. The Manhattan District Attorney's office declined to comment,

on or confirm the existence of an investigation. He also paid $62 million down in the USVI

to get his name taken out of that lawsuit as well. This dude has paid out more money than anyone

when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein. And yet somehow he's not on the radar, somehow he's never been

brought in and spoken to under oath. But sure, you're the asshole for asking for accountability.

You should just move on. I mean, isn't that what the president of the United States told us?

Imagine telling us to move on when he knew damn well what was in these files. My level of disgust

grows daily for Donald Trump and his administration. Black's attorney, Susan S.

Tritch of S. Tritch Golden, said Mr. Black, asked for an independent investigation of his

relationship with Epstein. The Decorate law firm investigated and reviewed more than 60,000

documents, interviewed more than 20 people and concluded that Mr. Black paid Epstein

for real estate planning and tax advice and that he had no awareness of Epstein's criminal

activity. Of course not. All that money for tax advice, over $150 million. Does anyone really

believe that? And if you do, boy, I have a bridge to sell you in the Mojave Desert.

Of the three civil lawsuits filed against Mr. Black, one has been dismissed,

the other withdrawn and the other is currently facing a case terminating motion for sanctions.

S. Tritch also said, there is absolutely no truth to any of the allegations against Mr. Black.

I don't believe that for a second, sorry. In fact, I believe the vast majority of the allegations.

How about that? I think that Leon Black is lying about the extent of his relationship with

Jeffrey Epstein and lying about a lot of this other stuff too.

Prior document disclosures also suggested third parties might be involved. Maria Farmer,

an artist who worked for Epstein around 1996, whose sister Annie was abused by Epstein and

the accomplice Maxwell, reported that the late financier stole nude images of her siblings.

Epstein stole the photos and negatives and is believed to have sold the pictures to potential

buyers. Farmer alleged in an FBI report from 1996. A document released in a prior exposure

indicates that Epstein and others might have shared child sexual abuse images. A lawyer

representing co-executor of Epstein's estate wrote the FBI in April 2023 for guidance.

During a review of documents, they encountered potential child sexual abuse images.

So other people, huh? Who are the other people, Cache Patel? Who are the other people that

were trading pictures with Jeffrey Epstein? How come they haven't been arrested?

I guess it's okay to possess that kind of imagery. I guess it's okay to prey on children.

I guess under Cache Patel and this FBI, it is.

Apparently, the relevant video was shared with Epstein by an individual who was convicted

of child pornography type offenses and depicted one of two topless women, the lawyer's letter states.

A past email that was released on November 12th by the House Oversight Committee shows Epstein

and an associate discussing girls and travel. This associate appeared to refer to deceased

French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel. Who was one of the worst of the worst? This guy rival

Epstein when it comes to degeneracy. But of course, he happened to die by suicide as well,

just another coincidence. Brunel was arrested in December of 2020 at Charles De Gaulle Airport

on suspicion of crimes such as alleged rape and sexual abuse of minors, as well as human trafficking

of underage girls for sexual exploitation. Brunel was thought to have provided teenage girls to Epstein

died in prison four years ago by a parent's suicide. Virginia Roberts, who was among the most

prominent accusers of Epstein and his accomplice Maxwell, had alleged in civil court papers that she

had been sexually exploited by Epstein's adult male peers, including royalty.

And we all know who that royalty was, huh? Bitchaz Prince Andrew, the joe exotic of the Windsor

family, the world's biggest douche. Roberts, who died by suicide this spring, alleged Epstein and

Maxwell introduced her to Andrew in 2001, claiming Maxwell forced her to have sex with the then prince.

The fallen former royal has denied any wrongdoing. A lawyer representing two Epstein victims

told investigators in a 2021 email that she had two clients who are trafficked to other men.

The document disclosures have shown that authorities had at various points downplayed participation

of other men. And the reason is they want to protect the system. They have to protect all the

people that pay the bills. And this is what I've been telling you for years now.

This is one of the most disgusting things, maybe in the history of America,

and the level that it reaches is unbelievable.

The FBI presentation listing prominent names, there is a page called Misconceptions. Epstein

did not regularly prostitute the victims in exchange for money. This page said that's true.

That is exactly true. He was providing girls and women so we can get that compromise, right?

So we can have blackmail. It wasn't about money. He had plenty of that from moving dark money.

It was about catching people up in the honey trap.

A case initiation summary stated that the FBI and Manhattan federal prosecutors said that one

victim in a 2019 meeting claimed being lent out to other men. Her statements regarding being

directed to have sex with other men was inconsistent with statements made by other victims, witnesses,

in particular her statements regarding being lent out to other men with another victim,

the other victim denied this occurring. The summary said, no other victims described being

directed by either Epstein or Maxwell to engage in sexual activity with other men.

The closest anecdote to being lent out, the memo said, involved Weinstein.

Nothing about Leon Black, huh? Nothing about Jess daily, huh?

Okay, I guess. Maybe you should ask less Wexner or George Mitchell or Bill Richardson or Glenn

Dubin. Any takers anybody want to talk to those dudes or no?

Attorney's for Epstein's victims tell the Guardian they believe Epstein provided teen girls

and young women to others. It's without question that a significant piece of Epstein and Maxwell's

vast sex trafficking operation was to provide young women and girls to other wealthy and powerful

individuals, said Sigrid McCauley, a managing partner at Boy Schiller Flexner, and longtime attorney

representing Epstein's survivors. This practice gave Epstein and Maxwell control and power

over individuals who were implicated in the sex trafficking.

Jennifer Freeman of Marsh Law, who represents Maria Farmer, said that at this point we have

more questions than answers. Where's the rest of Maria Farmer's FBI file? Where are the records

of complaints that so many other women's made to the FBI and how the FBI investigated those complaints?

And why is the DOJ hiding the names of perpetrators while exposing survivors? Freeman said,

all of that's valid. And I agree with her about all of it. The amount of redactions and the files

is absolutely ludicrous. Now it was expected, but it's still ludicrous.

And Spencer Coven of Goldlaw, who has represented numerous Epstein victims, said,

we know for certain from direct testimony of victims that Epstein provided girls to other

famous and notable people. Usually these favors were with the hope that he would get something in

return from these people. The recent documents only confirm what the victims have been saying all

along. He also said, the absence of a formal client list is not the same thing as proof that no

third parties participated. And I agree with that too. I've said from the jump, no client list exists.

Not in the capacity that people were talking about or expecting. And that was part of the

misdirection, right? So they could say, oh, look, there's no client list. That's all part of the

conspiracy. It's all a big conspiracy. And that was always going to be the play. But they done

fucked up. Didn't they? They stepped in it. And they told too many lies. And now those lies are

coming back to bite them directly in the ass. But even with all this evidence, all of this documentation,

the DOJ and the Trump administration, they're still on the same old bullshit.

Jeffrey Epstein was a lone predator. There was nobody else involved. And anybody saying anything

else is just engaging in a conspiracy theory. That's basically what they're telling us.

But the truth is, the DOJ is lying. And the truth is, Cash Patel perjured himself during his

congressional appearance when he fed us all that BS. And so my question is, what are we going to do

about it? All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.