
Meira K Show - The Security Shift: Why Threatened Countries Are Turning to Israel
About this episode
Despite the headlines, a very different story may be unfolding behind closed doors. As public criticism of Israel continues, more countries are quietly strengthening defense, intelligence, and strategic ties with Jerusalem—raising questions about what's really driving the shifting alliances in the Middle East. This episode explores why nations facing growing security threats are moving closer to Israel, how these partnerships are reshaping the regional balance of power, and why the most important geopolitical developments often happen far away from the public spotlight.
Get every episode summarized
Each time WGKM publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
368 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
WGKM — Meira K Show - The Security Shift: Why Threatened Countries Are Turning to Israel. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
Whilst the world is so busy hating on Israel, smart countries are actually quietly building alliances with them because they're all seen the same thing. Turkey is rising, Iran is threatening Russia's becoming a bit problematic in Israel is positioned to respond when conflicts come. On August 31, 2026, Greece proved this by signing a $3 billion defense agreement that imbends Israeli expertise into Greek military infrastructure permanently, but Greece is just the beginning. Because this reveals something much bigger. Every country that actually understands its security threats is coming to a similar conclusion. They want Israeli integration, they want Israeli expertise embedded in their systems because when the attacks come and they will come, Israel are the ones who are best position to know how to survive it. Here's the story of how Israel is building the coalition that is going to reshape the global power and world for the better. Welcome to Geopolitics, explain. Let's give some context to what happened in Greece. So our story doesn't actually begin with Greece, despite the breaking headlines this week
of the new $3 billion defense agreement signed between Israel and them, but rather it starts on the other side of the world in India, where this pattern has started much earlier. By now you probably know that India is a massive country with over a billion people and one of the largest militaries on earth in India faces Pakistan directly across a long border separated only by a line drawn in 1947 and Pakistan is a bit problematic because they have ballistic missiles and nuclear abilities and they have fought multiple wars against India. Pakistan has supported military threats, terrorism against India and they are in a conflict that doesn't seem to be ending anytime soon. This is an existential threat to India every single day and it will come as no surprise that Pakistan is a Muslim country. India looked at that threat and asked who has actually built a defense system that works when you're facing coordinated attacks from a nuclear armed enemy who has operational expertise that has survived multiple simultaneous threats in real combat and India went to
Israel. Israel became one of India's biggest customers, 29% of Israeli major arms export from 2021, which means roughly one of every three major Israeli weapons system leaving the country ends up in Indian hands. But India doesn't just buy the weapons and walk away because India has moved into joint production with Israel, which means Israel and India and companies between the two of them are now working together to create defense technology which creates permanent structural integration that ties Indian survival to Israeli expertise for decades. An enormous country with over a billion people facing a nuclear armed enemy on its border chooses Israel to help it survive and I hope that tells you something fundamental about what India understands about the future but you see it's not just India. On the other side of the world, Singapore faces a completely different threat environment. Singapore is small, Singapore is surrounded by large neighbors, Singapore has no strategic death and Singapore can't afford to lose even one conflict because Singapore has no a really too rich retune.
And Singapore also chose Israel, receiving roughly 12% of its major arms imports from Israeli systems and maintaining a particularly close defense relationship with Israel for decades. The Singapore understood that survival means buying expertise from someone who has already solved the problem of defending against impossible odds. And then of course there is Vietnam. Vietnam is thousands of miles away from both India and Singapore and yet Vietnam faces a completely different adversary in China. Vietnam is concerned about Chinese expansion and Chinese military modernization and Chinese pressure across Southeast Asia and Vietnam has experienced Chinese military intervention repeatedly throughout history and knows exactly what Chinese military capability means and Soviet-Nambia built a significant Israeli defense relationship. And then there's the Philippines. The Philippines face maritime threats from China across contested water and chose Israeli systems roughly 20% of Philippines' major arms imports come from Israel.
Integrating Israeli air defense technology and radar and surveillance systems because the Philippines understood that you survive maritime threats by imposing expertise from someone who has already solved the problem of defending against a much larger power. You don't give up the ability to defend yourself because of political stupidity. And then, in talking about political stupidity, there is the United Arab Emirates. Four decades, the UAE opposed Israel based on Arab-Loxelidarity and Palestinian support the UAE's entire political identity was tied to anti-Israel positioning, lined with a broader Arab world. But when the A-Brahama calls shifted the regional political equation and the UAE's leadership realized Iran really did pose a serious regional threat. They actually stopped caring about this historical Arab alignment and started caring about whether its infrastructure could survive Iranian attacks. And so, when it came down to it, the UAE rapidly integrated with Israeli defense systems surveillance platforms, counter drone technology, radar, electronic warfare, intelligence systems,
cyber capabilities, the entire ecosystem. The UAE made the same choice that India made and Singapore made, the Vietnam made, the UAE looked at the military threat and asked who has actually solved this problem and then the UAE answered Israel. And this is important because the UAE overcame ideological barriers to make this choice, which proves to us that when survival is on the line, countries should be abandoning politics and choose expertise because that is the smartest thing to do. And yet, it's not just smart, it's actually about survival. Israel, this tiny country surrounded by enemies has survived against all odds. And now countries that are realizing they might start facing similar threats or have already been facing threats, understand that maybe they don't have to go at this alone. Maybe other countries also have their expertise. And Israel does. Are you starting to see the pattern? Good, because we're not done. Next, we have a Zarbajan, which faces Armenia across a contested border and chose Israeli systems, becoming one of Israel's most important customers as Zarbajan understood what all the
other countries understood too. It's better to have Israel on your side because Israel actually understands the problem at hands. Remember, these countries have nothing to do with each other. You've got India and Singapore which are separated by thousands of miles in Vietnam and Zarbajan which face completely different adversaries and Philippines and India have different security concerns. And the UAE, they're all in different regions. They face different enemies. They have different political systems and different alliance structures. And yet, they have all come to a similar conclusion independently that Israel has the answer to military problems and is better to be friends with. And now Greece has joined that exact coalition spending $3 billion to make Israeli technology and Israeli expertise, the foundation of Greek military survival. But what is it exactly of these countries learned that Greece is now learning? They figured out that separate countries understanding military reality from countries that don't. They learned that their alliances won't reliably protect them on days that it matters.
Singapore can't assume that America or Japan will immediately show up if they're attacked. The Vietnam can't assume Russia or China will defend it. India can't assume any alliance will save it if Pakistan launches a serious military operation. And in Zarbajan can't assume anyone will help when threatened. These countries therefore asked the really hard question. Who has built and survived coordinated drone and missile attacks? Who has used these attacks to create an integrated air and defense system and that works operation the under real combat conditions? Who can integrate so permanently that they can survive? Being 72 hours without waiting for alliance back up to materialize. And obviously the answer to all of these countries came below the Israel because Israel has been doing exactly that for decades and is operational expertise to prove it works. And so you may be asking yourself why does Greece need to come to this same answer? Well, it turns out that Greece actually has a very serious enemy of its own. Which is why their decision to spend $3 billion on the Achilles shield makes sense.
If you understand what Greece learned in 1974, they learned about NATO. When Turkey invaded Cyprus, Turkish forces crossed the Mediterranean, landed on the island, invaded and occupied the northern third of the country and displaced roughly 200,000 Greek Cypriots from their homes. Greece appealed to NATO for intervention but NATO faced a problem. Turkey is a NATO member and Greece is a NATO member. And when these two members go to war, NATO doesn't choose sides. And NATO got out easy. They could stay neutral because this was happening in Cyprus which isn't a NATO country. Greece learned that when you're in conflict with another NATO member, collective defence doesn't really apply. You're alone if it doesn't work for NATO's ideology. So when Greece looked at Turkey's military trajectory in 2024 and 2025, Greece wasn't asking does NATO have our back because Greece already knows what NATO is going to do. Greece is asking something a little bit more complicated. If Turkey attacks us directly, can we survive the opening 72 hours without support and they
can't? And by the way, Turkey knows that NATO won't support them. Turkey's defence industry is self-sufficient now. Turkey builds its own drones, its own cruise missiles, its own defence systems, its own frigates, its own submarines. Turkey is significantly reduced to reliance on foreign suppliers. Turkey is building an entire defence ecosystem domestically and can iterate on designs, improve production processes and maintain supply lines without heavy dependency on external partners. It fundamentally changes Turkey's strategic position because Turkey becomes harder to pressure through sanctions or supply disruption. Turkey is uncontrollable. Turkey is also building Khan, its indigenous fifth generation fighter. Turkey's defence documents state that the first flight occurred in February and entered into inventory and will be working around 2028, which means Turkey is really developing. The aircraft with capabilities is for usage very soon and they have 80 million people on much larger base than Greece's 10 millions people, a larger economy, greater strategic
depth, a demonstrated willingness to use military force. I mean, you will remember Cyprus in 1974 in Syria in 2016 when Turkey intervened militarily in Libya in 2019 when Turkey sent forces to support the Libyan government. Turkish leadership is openly attacking Greece for strengthening ties with Israel, with Turkish government statements explicitly condemning Greek defence modernisation, explicitly condemning Greece's military cooperation with Israel, explicitly warning that Greece's strengthening ties with Israel represent Turkish aggression, meaning Greece can see what Turkey is actually building out and doing. Greece can see Turkey's capabilities. This can see Turkey's not hiding back or pulling back from attacking other countries when it works for them and they can hear Turkey calling Greece out. They know the threat is imminent, but here's what Greece's understanding that other countries are struggling to or are actively avoiding.
Greece cannot match Turkey's military production on any sustained basis because Turkey has a larger population and industrial capacity that allows it to build more weapons faster than Greece can acquire them. And NATO might not show up when it actually matters because history proves this has happened before and therefore Greece needs to survive an opening attack alone without waiting for Article 5 meetings to convene or for American bombers to arrive from the United States or for NATO to reach consensus on how to respond when two friends of NATO fight each other. That means Greece needs air defense that can absorb coordinated drones and missile strikes without degrading to the point where Turkey can win achieving its military objectives. That means command and control systems that made rapid decisions whilst under attack rather than meetings. And that means expertise imported from a country that has actually built and tested these systems in real combat against multiple adversaries firing simultaneously. Greece wants to import from Israel because Israel has spent decades defending against drones
cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, oil-during munitions of electronic warfare and saturation attacks. Israel has developed integrated air and missile defense that works operation the Israel has iterated and improved the systems based on real warfare experience rather than just on theories. And Israel has built an ecosystem designed to survive these attacks when dozens or hundreds of weapons and drones arrive simultaneously. And the defender has to make rapid decisions about which systems to use against which targets to maximize interceptor efficiency and avoid wasting expensive missiles on cheap targets. What I'm trying to say is that Greece is not falling for Turkey's manipulation and lies the way that other European countries are and that NATO is, but rather is aligned with Israel and understands that you're better off having friends of people who are prepared for a potential attack by your enemy than just bearing your head in the sound like all of Europe. Yes, even if this means that countries might not like you or you're doing something a little
bit politically incorrect, you're better off having a friend in Israel than being its enemy. And so on August 31, 2026 Greece and Israel signed Israel's largest ever defense export agreement with them, $3 billion with implementation beginning immediately. The agreement creates an integrated Greek national air and missile defense architecture centered on Israeli technology and command and control integration. The architecture includes David Sling, Israel's medium to long range ballistic missile defense system and it's designed to intercept sophisticated rockets and missiles. Greece will become only the second international customer for David Sling after Finland and this is significant because Israel has used David Sling operation against Iranian missile threats, which means Greece is acquiring a system that has actual combat experience. The agreement includes multiple layers of air defense capability, medium range systems designed to handle aircraft and cruise missiles short-range systems for aircraft and drones and radar to providing the detection and tracking layer that allows the system to see incoming
threats. Now you need to ask yourself, why am I telling you all of this? Well, it's because Greece is understanding that the Turkey threat might actually become as serious as the Iranian threat. The threat that Israel has protected itself against for all these years and worked to defend against. Remember, this deal includes protection for strategic sites against drone attacks and the centerpiece is the unified national command and control system that Israel will build specifically for Greece. It's not a software platform in that way, but rather it's bringing together Israeli operational experience and will be able to decide a real time under attack how to integrate radar, command centers, threat identification, weapon selection and interception into a functioning network that makes rapid decisions about which intercepted views against which target to maximize efficiency and survival. Guys, it's all really, really, really cool. But that's not the point. Greece's defense ministry explicitly describes this as an important Israeli operational
experience gained during actual warfare. Once the integration happens, it's structural and it's permanent and Israeli software will run through Greek command centers. Israeli trainers will work with Greek air defense personnel, Israeli maintenance relationships persist for decades because Greek systems depend on Israeli spare parts and Israeli technical expertise. Greek and Israeli military systems are networked together so that information flows between them because Israel is looking at Greece as a serious partner against the enemy that they know will become genuinely serious over the next few years. Turkey. This is not just a one time sale. This is a long term agreement to ensure dependency and the ability to work together because Israel can see the long term issues of Turkey's expansion understands that when Iran threatened this sort of stuff 50 years ago, they actually meant it and that Turkey is set on a similar trajectory and Greece understands it too. And so the alliance is proving to be a very important and significant one, not just because
of what it means for Israel and not just because it means that Greece might potentially in the future be able to stay safe, but because more and more countries are starting to understand that the long term Islamist threat is real and that if you want to survive it, you need to look towards the country that has been succeeding in surviving it despite the world not believing them that the threat is real. The amount of the advanced equipment that Greece is acquiring from planes to drones, etc., etc. Greece is really serious about defending against Turkey. They're building out a really comprehensive military modernization program that will be supporting their air defense and acquiring modern fighters with first delivery scheduled for 2020 and upgrading to a larger fleet of fourth generation plus fighters with advanced radars. I mean, they see this threat as a very, very, very serious one. They're acquiring additional modern fighters from France for specific scenarios. They're working on building out a more modern navy. They're modernizing different submarines and their air independent propulsion.
They are establishing domestic drone production and anti-drones systems. Greece is implementing what the Greek Defense Ministry calls agenda 2030, a comprehensive 12-year defense modernization program explicitly designed to transform Greece from a predominantly fourth generation regional military into a highly networked force combining fifth generation aircrafts, advanced surface ships, submarines, and layered air defense. And they've understood that none of that advanced equipment will help. If in the opening Turkish strides, they destroy your bases in your command infrastructure before you could even fight back. And so that's why they've acquired a QILE shield. It solves a problem of how to keep your military infrastructure intact and functional during any opening phase of a conflict. And Turkey is watching this carefully because they understand exactly what this means. Greece, Egypt, Israel, Cyprus are increasingly coordinating on Mediterranean security and defense issues to constrain potential Turkish expansion. Turkish media outlets are publishing warnings against this Israel-Grease Cyprus-Egypt
axis forming around Turkey. The government suppresses alarm about the coalition. Officials have made statements critical of the QILE shield agreement. Turkey is getting anger and more openly hostile because the coalition is working as intended. Coordinate defense makes Turkish military expansion more difficult and more expensive. Greece is not only being smart and realistic about the threat of Turkey. It's also realistic about the limits of NATO, which should be strong enough that a defense agreement with Israel is not really necessary, but alas, this is not the case. NATO won't automatically defend Greece against Turkey because NATO's response to conflicts between two members is complicated. Yes, Article 5 could be invoked, but each member decides what assistance to provide. Washington has prioritized escalation rather than automatic war, and this is why Greece cannot assume that NATO will be decisive on day one and help them, which means Greece needed to build the capacity to survive against Turkey, and is why Greece needs expertise from a country that has already solved the problems they are facing.
It's why Greece has spent $3 billion in decreasing with Israel permanently. Honestly, every other European country facing serious military threats should be asking the same questions that Greece did, and most aren't. Poland faces Russia across a long border and acts as if NATO membership means Russia won't attack or that NATO will immediately respond with overwhelming force. Romania is modernizing its military, but assumes NATO will handle opening phases of conflict. Finland's selected David Sling for long-range air defense, becoming the second international customer, after Greece, but appears to assume NATO will be decisive. The Baltics are building NATO infrastructure and behave as if collective defense means automatic American military response without diplomatic negotiations, but we've already done a whole episode on NATO. It's not so clear cut that they're helpful. They're all betting on the assumption that Greece is now explicitly rejected based on the evidence, because Greece is right, and India is right, and Singapore is right, and Vietnam is right, and Azerbaijan is right, and the UAE is right, they're all right.
Israel is the friend you want on your side, especially because NATO won't reliably defend against Turkey. NATO is massive incentive to prevent a Greece Turkey, rather than to join in on Greece's side, and they can't assume that NATO will help them. Greece needs to build military capacity to survive, and it's what it is doing. It is being smart, because if Greece is right, and India, and Singapore, and Vietnam, and Azerbaijan, and the UAE are right, they're all coming to identical conclusions, that rational countries facing serious danger should be doing exactly what Greece is doing. Finding countries that have already solved their problems, integrating permanently with those countries' military systems and expertise treating NATO membership as not something too serious. NATO is a bit of a joke. Greece remembers 1974. The UAE is experiencing Iran right now. Europe should be figuring this out before the next crisis, and the irony is that they don't need to look far, because Israel is right there, having built us on the world's best defense
tech, two druids being attacked all the time. But this is exactly why the enemies of the West have spent so many years specifically attacking Israel. They see Israel's strength, they see Israel's ability, and they want Western countries to be bullied into not integrating with them. Because once you integrate with Israel, you have a much, much, much higher chance of survival. But smart countries that are being strategically rational are understanding the military, reality, and acting on it. And that's why what actually happened here is something much bigger than just Greece purchasing from Israel. They're executing as sophisticated as tragedy to position themselves as the center of a global security for threatened countries. Israel understands the world's major security challenges. Turkey, rising and threatening. Greece and Cyprus needing defense. Iran is threatening the UAE and regional stability. China is threatening Vietnam and Philippines. Pakistan is threatening India. Armenia is in conflict with Azerbaijan. And Israel is positioned to help every one of those countries defend themselves against terrible, terrible threats. Greece needed protection against Turkey and Israel is providing it.
The UAE needed protection against Iran and Israel is providing it. Vietnam needed protection against China and Israel is providing it. India needed protection against Pakistan and Israel has provided it. Do you notice what all of those things have in common? Every one of those countries are enemies of the West. And somehow Israel is on the forefront of defending against those enemies, doing good for the entire world. It's not a coincidence. Israel has built this out and is trying to help the world, embedding itself in the security of the structure and helping every threat and country enough. They're not just selling weapons. They're becoming indispensable to the survival of countries facing existential threat in every country that integrates with Israeli defense systems and expertise in command of control, and the system becomes permanently bound to Israel's strategic interest. And every country that integrates with Israel realizes pretty quickly that this is a smart thing to do. And in many ways, it means that Western ideals, Israel's ideals will be defended against
the enemies. Europe should be paying attention, not just because Greece figures something out, but because Israel is building something far larger, a global coalition of countries that have chosen the Western way of life as their path to survival against rising regional powers. This is an important story reshaping global power right now, and one that countries should pay attention to, and I'm Erika and I will see you next time.
More episodes
More from WGKM

Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - O'Reilly Update Morning Edition, Sep...
WGKM

The Megyn Kelly Show - Trump Headlines GOP Midterm Convention, Lewandowski Inves...
WGKM

The Trish Regan Show - Maria Bartiromo to Another Network?! Fox HUMILIATED After...
WGKM

The Erin Molan Show - Trump Said TWO WORDS About Iran And All Hell Broke Loose
WGKM