Loading...
Hosts & Guests
Transcript
SHOLEM TO ALL!
Today's office is going to have $1, and we're starting 1 game on a base about 12 lines up for the bottom at the two dots with the
Coffin Mesh, our Pashim and Eimer, and today's office sponsor Lil' Nishmash, Mars, Mim, Starbass, Maka, Masha, Hurnesh, I'm not sure I have an Olyah.
So Mesh had told us our Pashim and Eimer Mesh has choked a hand in the Kulu, this sheet's for Pashim and the Mesh, they're the Mesh, they're the Mesh, they have a Kain.
You know what a Kain himself does in Averot, and he has to bring Mesh, they actually has a Kain Mesh taken out of it, and the Kain Mesh and the rest of the Mesh are burned separately.
As to where I'm going on a melee, how do we know this?
To talk about because we have a Brisa, the project tells us about his little Kain Kamincha, and this is specifically grinding him in Khas Khaitay.
What do we learn from here though?
Shit, they have a Dostok, Sherebai, there's a Vajna's Kasha with him, which means that the Kain is a lot of Duda Vajda, and of his own Min Khas Khaitay.
When he's able to have a Khas Khaitay, Kamincha wanted to say that to me like a regular Min Khat.
The same way that one Kain brings his own Min Khat Min Khas Nidava, is only he decided to give out on his own, so he's the one that does that Vajda of it.
It's the same thing, when he asked to bring him a Khas Khaitay, he's also allowed to do that Vajda.
Says the Brisa, Ataaimersh, Tehavidas, Sherebai, or Eine Allah, Hati, Min Khas Khaitay, Shakhae Hanim, you say that it's coming to tell us that A Vajda of Min Khas Khaitay, the Kain is muttered to be done by the Kain himself.
Maybe it's telling us that Min Khas Khaitay, the Kain is mutter, meaning that she right-mulled to be eaten, and if I'm not mistaken, I'm not going to ask for a Kain called Tehav, or I say A-Khal,
So how do I understand it's another pass, so that any Min Khav Khayin has to be completely burned and sound to be eaten, Min Khas Nidvasai, that's talking about Min Khatay donate, but Khav Vasai Teh Ne Khales, but perhaps Min Khas Khaitay has to bring, again, such as Min Khas Khaitay, maybe that's allowed to be eaten.
So I'm allowed to have the pass success, but I still can't come in Khat, but I have to come in Khas Khaitay, his Min Khas Khaitay is compared to Min Khas De Dava, Man Nidvasai Teh Ne Khales, just like Min Khas De Dava that he brings his knowledge to be eaten, but Khav Vasai Teh Ne Khales, such as Min Khas Khaitay, is not eaten either.
As it means the original dresser stays true, that he's allowed to do the avaida of his Min Khas Khaitay, that he has to bring.
Now, that was a time of karma, however, all of a sudden, Rashimah says that he never bahasala kain kimin khasai, does the pass success say, as you beat to the kain like his Min Khat, doesn't say that, but really never, Ella kimin Khat, all it says is it's like A-Min Khat, and what does that tell us, Ella Hakesh, Aindana Al-Manafan on top, Min Khas Khaitay Shah-Kaihan, and Khav Khas Khaitay Shah Yisrael.
Yes. Apparently, though, Khav Chaitay, that he has a bowl of corn, that's historic.
of commits a Tikian out of it.
If that's really so, says the Bryseer,
then why don't we also say that mom and after a shone
commits a Vishy around ahelin,
after ahelin commits a Shone.
After ahelin commits a Shone,
just like the one who commits a shone,
that's the commits a Tikian out of it,
and the remainders are eaten by the kaihanim.
That's a pretty good thing to have as well.
It has the committed a Tikian out of it
and the leftovers are also eaten.
So I'm leaving to that.
The post says,
la kaihan kemencha,
where the woman from your little kaihan keemancha
sebeloth la ilaishim kemencha.
That is then because only similar
for the kaihan, But not for the fire.
Our climates is brought by itself and the strutment brought by them sells burned on the fire.
It means it does have to be taken from it, but it's still not eaten.
It has to be burned.
That's the bottom line source for she deserves shimmen.
Now we go back to the beginning of this bryceau.
Ask the gomara.
Hoshita avidastakshirabai mehachan afka.
Is that really where we learn?
Then minachaschita eva kain is glad to be done by the kain himself.
That avoids us glad to be done by him.
May hoshima nafka to relearn from the following.
The bryce tells us min'a the kain chihuahom.
Maka maka maka mochali is hoshosh here atte.
Then we know that kain is glad to come and be maka of his karbana's whatever time or
whatever situation he wants.
Tell him what he's supposed to say.
Is ubabachal avas nafshah if he she race and he could come at the desire of his soul
and serve.
And so it's mash from there already.
Then if he has to bring minachaschita, he's glad to bring that himself.
He doesn't have to give it to another kain.
Is this the gomara?
No.
I may have some if we only had that source have min'a.
I would think, I need minachaschita in ba'al-gheat.
That's only something that doesn't come because of a gheat.
I'll have minachaschita in ba'al-gheat.
But some of the comes because of a gheat in ba'al-gheat.
I might say that he's not allowed to bring it.
And that's what we need our original bza for.
Is that really learned from here?
Meaning again, from the original bza for the following.
Then Pazak tells us we'll keep our kain al-Nafshah sh-gagas b-sh-gagah.
And the kains b-chapar for the nafshah sh-gagas who sins b-sh-gagam.
Malam is teached of sh-gagam ischaparle de atmai.
They act from ischapar by himself, meaning through his own actions,
he's allowed to bring his own kapara.
As that tells us he's allowed to bring his own minachaschita.
If we just had that, I haven't been able to think.
Hanimili b-sh-gag.
That's only when he was over and over and over.
B-sh-gag.
Then he can bring that kaban himself and do the whole avayda.
Aval b-mazid l-ay.
But if he was over b-mazid, you might think that he's not allowed
to do that vayda and he has to give it to a different kain.
Come on, show us what the khedash is.
That even when he's over and over and over and over and over and he has to bring the kaban,
he's still allowed to be the one that brings that kaban and does the whole process.
And we just have to clarify, b-mazid heikhim sh-kha khasala what's the situation
where he's going to bring up b-mazid.
We know that he's usually only brought b-sh-gag.
And the answer is b-zada-in-sh-vua.
That's when he makes a false sh-vua.
B-mazid, he wouldn't have to bring a kaban and that's the case we're referring to.
Now, we can tell you just constantly in this tiny area that we have another b-mazid.
And the chemical is brought by itself on the fire, and the sh-vua brought by themselves on the fire.
That's the terrible sh-vua reality.
No.
Narb-lahzir-mahema is a r-b-sh-m-n-sun.
He tells us that a chemical is brought by a sh-vua and if the sh-vua is spazr,
and the sh-vua is a r-bazid, the sh-vua's spazr, and the sh-vua is sprinkled,
or scattered, on the base hadash- Adventure.
And now we have to clarify that the sh-vua'r-brah-weir abo,
have him bring up the sh-vua'r-ubiyachin, ask the ba-tah-s, base hadash-nuh-i-khull,
But where's this base hadation that we're referring to, that the Shirai are being sprinkled
on Idil Ma'la, if it's talking about above, meaning the base hadation on the Mizba'ach,
the pile of ashes there, Haino'avua, that's the same thing as his father.
That's no different than Rupshim and Shita.
And Idil Ma'atah, for it's that we're talking about below, meaning off the Mizba'ach, Yashchadavash
a carved Mata.
Do you have any carbon that the way to be macrivit is doing it off of the Mizba'ach?
No.
And we're not understanding that we're being macrivit the Shirai, but how are we doing
that off of the Mizba'ach?
Sorry, I'm a little bit about it.
We're about to hold him.
Maybe we're actually supposed to destroy it, and we're not being macrivit the Shirai,
like we just said, we're really just supposed to destroy them, and that's why they're being
placed on the base hadation off of the Mizba'ach.
So, a Khikho'alai, they actually laughed at Rupha Abab.
They didn't like this shot, because they said, we're going to have to hold over
the carved Mizba'ach.
Is there anything that when we bring it, when we're macrivit, it's supposed to be destroyed.
However, Tani'avua, the father of Rupha, the father of Rupha, teaches his father
that the puzzle is the puzzle of Kha'almen, Kha'almen, Kha'almen, Kha'almen, Kha'almen, Kha'almen,
Every Mimcha B'Kayan has to be burned and it's not going to be eaten.
Now, this actually comms right after the puzzle discusses the Mimcha's Kha'almen of the Kayan
Godol, which we know is supposed to be completely burned.
And then, it tells us this puzzle that every Mimcha B'Kayan has to be burned and it's not
going to be eaten.
So, what's this comparison?
La Khiluxessi, vaudabra aqer, we're comparing it only in regards to eating her consumption
and not to anything else.
No, Mimcha's Kha'almen of the Kain is being compared to Mimcha's Kha'almen of the Kain Godol.
And as much as that, it's not going to be eaten, that's all.
It's different with what is done with it.
When you ask me to burn it on the top of his back,
or when you ask me to burn it,
it will be destroyed and it's not going to burn on his back.
As the commander, Mike Amir, what's being said over here?
How could we learn this from that?
What type of limit is this?
So I'm about to clarify.
I ask him where this one's being said.
And we're going to be chopping up the puzzle.
Comments ask me to burn it.
When you ask me to burn it,
then when you ask me to burn it,
then you ask me to burn it on the top of his back,
such as when you ask me to burn it,
and then when the puzzle says,
it's not burned.
It's supposed to be totally burned.
Nidvasai, that's referring to a Mincha's Nidava, that's totally burned on him as Ba'ach.
And therefore the Loise A'chel and the Colotia are actually referring to two different ways
of processing it.
Loise A'chel means don't eat it, but do not necessarily burn it on top of his Ba'ach.
Rather put it on the base hadashin, as opposed to Colotia, that means burn on top of his
Ba'ach.
Our only rava, Rava asked him, Saki-ne-Kharifa-Mafsqa-Kray.
Literally this means a very sharp knife is cutting up the puzzle.
You're basically cutting and pasting the puzzle, totally out of order, so that's not the
proper way to understand it.
Elma Rava, rather Rava said as follows, this is how we understand it.
Similar, yet very different, Colotia is calling Colotia, and that's reading the puzzle
straight without cutting and pasting, once it's referring to Nidvasai, his Mincha's Nidava,
so it's totally burned, and then when the puzzle says Loise A'chel, it's not to be eaten,
Khai-Vasai, that's Mincha's Khai-Vasai.
As the gmara of Eipachana, maybe I should switch around the Drasha and Colotia, maybe
he's referring to his Khai-Vasai, and Loise A'chel is referring to his Nidava, and that
means that what we're going to actually do with it is going to be different as well.
So as the gmara of the Star of Nidvasai, I have a little re-a, it's more logical to
include his Mincha's Nidava, that that's going to be burned on the mizbehach, why she can't
to deer her, that's more often, it's more often that he's going to come and donate a mincha,
just to bring one because he didn't have a ra, also like Khate, it's not brought because
of an a ra, and bust some re-a, it has a pleasant smell, because it also has Lovino with it,
as the gmara of Eipachana said the opposite, Khai-Vasai has a re-a, we should include
Mincha's Khai-Vasai, why she can't use sarayn, because it's brought with a sarayn
of flour, which is like the Mincha's Khai-Vitan, and Khai-Vas, it's also brought because
of Khai-Vasai, which is Mincha's Khai-Vitan as well, is brought because of Khai-Vas, and
so there's a gmara, no, Hanakhafishan, these are more, Mincha's Nidava of Khai-Vasai has
three ways that it's compared to Mincha's Khai-Vitan of Khai-Vasai, as well as Mincha's Khai-Vasai
of Khai-Vasai is only compared in two ways, so that's what we include, Mincha's Nidava,
and out Mincha's Khai-Vasai of Khai-Vasai, we now go to the other sheet to bring our
bundle, court to our bundle, and have a Khai-Vasai of Khai-Vasai of Khai-Vasai of Khai-Vasai
Khai-Vasai of Khai-Vasai of Khai-Vasai of Khai-Vasai of Khai-Vasai of Khai-Vasai of Khai-Vasai,
and so that's what the three ways are.
So to any minute, I'm not by a client,
it has to be called a doctor, and who I can.
We can see the other side of the house.
Just over here with a regular minute of a client,
and there's a lois that say to eat it,
I'm not allowed to see the other side of the house.
So to be honest, it's a lois that say to eat the other side
of a client, God, all.
And that's the number one on, do it this possible.
We're not gonna discuss it,
by your venerable asses, follows.
Can't you all call me a morin?
Mahoo.
That's a client eight from a morin with a carbon.
A morin are the parts of the carbon
that are supposed to burn the olives back,
and let's say a client eight from the same morin.
We'll further clarify,
such as Azar, a non-coyne,
he's not allowed to eat couchin,
they're only allowed to eat by a client,
and he's over alive, if he does.
So I'm sure the client is over the lot
of Azar eating couchin, he's not allowed to,
if he eats the morin,
because they're supposed to burn on his back.
So that's not the question.
So by the way, what's my question?
Lav de Colotia is the over another lav
of that it's supposed to be completely burned,
and it wasn't burned because he ate it.
It was also over that lav, my what's to do,
and some of the iron larvae,
and the iron told me,
you know what, Tashma, we've arrived,
and you have a bright sorrow,
but those guys called Tashma.
Only to do so,
then say would you come back,
but I say that that really,
you know what,
BLANK-2003 else,
a very famous teacher from visit
here?
In those times,
if you don't have the risk,
then please look out at him,
and you know,
Because as we just said.
Everything goes to him as back.
Another category just massapes it.
Shtiao lechem lachem lachem aponim.
the shtiao lechem of shintuit.
Lachem aponim of every single week in the midst of the makingthash.
nachem lakai hanim the eaten by the kai hanim.
The eaten by the heen behenlam as back.
And none of it's part on them as back.
And hbazai yaflka nachem lakai hanim.
Bik out on them as back.
with ease the kai khla kai hanim is stronger than them as back.
Because everything goes to kai hanim and not in them as back.
The Goumar begins by asking on the first part of the mention of a sulakah.
There's no other ones.
by asking on the first part of the mission of a sulekka. There's no other ones. There's
nothing else which is complete from his back and not for the kai'anima at all. The kai'aila,
carbonite is completely burned on his back. The answer is that no, ikai'aila kai'anima,
the height of a carbon-aila goes to the kai'anima. That's not counted in the mission of Asagmar.
Like, Aila's ha'if. There's a Aila's ha'if. That's completely burned on his back and it's not
knee-knad all by kai'anima. The answer is ikamura vennitza. The crop and the feathers are put on
the side of the mizbach and they're not burned on top and so forth, that's not included in the
mission of Asagmar. It can suck him. What about Nusachim? The wine libations are poured on the
mizbach and they're not taken by the kai'anima at all. And it's just like more Aila's sheet
in Azali. They go down to the sheet in which it's like a chamber beneath the mizbach,
underneath the ground of the mizbach, as they're not really for the mizbach because they just flow
through a pipe to the sheet in. So it's got the next stage of the ratio of the mizbach,
umai, bazoo. So it's the mission of emphasizing what it says, bazoo, with this. You see,
the kai'aila mizbach is great in the kai'aila kai'anima. That's pretty obvious when you learn
the mizbach. Why does it have to repeat itself? What's it coming to emphasize? They're just
like fucking mizbach. They exclude what shmul says. What shmul says? What shmul says?
So we have the same question of suleqa. There's no more things that are complete for the kai'anima
and nothing goes on the mizbach. That's eaten by the kai'anima completely and none of it's burned
on the mizbach. The answer is that no, iqadama. The blood is sprinkled on the mizbach. As the
more of iqa like shmul shmul saira. There's a lot of oil on the mizbach, which is completely eaten
by the kai'anima and answers the gmara. No, iqamat noisab. There's my tunnais, the applications
that are done with this oil on the mizbach. And towards the paray khas, even though it's not
put on the mizbach, it's not 100% completely eaten by the kai'anima. I want to give me
the same question over here, my bizu. Why is the mizha have to say bizu with this? The kai'anima
is stronger than mizbach. It's pretty obvious. The answer is that fuck you man, do amar,
they exclude the one that holds shtai alaqam, but it's from the atsman los rafa asyon that shtai alaqam
if they come by themselves and there's no lambs. There's no qvasim to be had, to be brought along
with the shtai alaqam. That these shtai alaqam are actually burned. Kama shmul the khidish is
the bizu yafakach, the kai'anima oil am, they're with this with the shtai alaqam. The kai'anima
always have this kai'aq that even if there's no qvasim, they still are going to eat the shtai alaqam,
that's the amount of this mizhna. We're going to stop for the day and pick up the market to discuss
how to process mizhna khas for now. Everyone should have a wonderful day.
