Menachot 75

Today's death is Masechus Menachos' death.

Iain, hey, we learned the mission of a debate

over whether different meal offerings are broken into pieces.

Tanaqama rules that the meal offerings of a Israel, of a non-Koin,

it's folded, first into one over two,

and it's two parts of the match folded,

and folded into four pieces, and then it's broken on those folds.

The meal offering of the priest of the Koanim

is folded into four pieces, but it's not separated on the folds.

Again, the meal offering of the Koin Gadol, of the Koin Mashiach,

that doesn't get folded at all.

The shimmel disagrees and holds it even

the meal offering of the Koanim, it's not broken,

either, and the ones that are broken,

that we do end up breaking those should be broken into pieces

of Kizai Tsai's pieces.

So comes a vio-safe, and I'm based in the Gamaar,

an extracts a halacha from this mission

into the realm of the laws of brachos.

That a chaviza, which is a cook dish,

that contains pieces of bread, of Kizai's sized pieces of bread.

So the halacha is, that requires a brachah,

says ravi-safe, ad ham-o-tsi, la hamina arats.

But if the pieces of bread are less than a Kizai's,

then the brachah is going to be burried,

my name is Zonos.

Shokhan aroch, or achaim,

some kufsari ches, kufsamach ches,

si-fjod.

The ruling is that chaviza,

which are crams of bread, as we said,

stuck together with the brach that it's inside.

That requires a bit of an analysis.

Says the chokhan aroch,

if it was cooked,

and they are the size of a Kizai's,

of an all of size, even if it's lost,

it's toar la ham,

the language of the chokhan aroch,

it's lost, it's imager,

it's sort of look of bread.

So we recite ham-o-tsi still,

and we make a birka samazo at the end of that meal.

But if they're less than a Kizai's in their measurement,

even if it has the image in the outline of bread,

so the brachah is only going to be masonos,

and of course at the end,

a brachah acha,

made in chalosh,

the brachah of al-ha-mechia.

The mission of Bura,

and Sivkato Nuneh,

explains the rationale in the first part of the halachah,

the cave of the Kizai's,

since it contains a Kizai's,

lo-ni-spat-o-mi-mena-shem-lacham,

it doesn't lose its name,

it doesn't lose its identity as bread.

One application of this so-gya,

is Kan-e-d-lach,

or Matsubals,

where the Magan-e-vrab,

and Sivkato-n-kaf-ras,

rules that if they are made from scraps of bread,

or soaked bread,

Ham-o-tsi is going to be recited,

a fascinating approach to the Magan-e-vrab,

since it started on its bread,

just like we learn here in Armas-e-ch-e-vrab,

on Ein-hame-bays,

that if the bread is broken down

until it becomes like flour,

and then it rolls all back up and bakes out,

that's your son,

the Lange-le-gamar uses,

one must recite Ham-o-tsi,

even if then,

it's no longer has the Torah-lacham,

the identity,

the look,

the image,

the outline of the bread,

since it is treated as broken pieces

that still have a Kizaius,

requiring Ham-o-tsi,

even without it,

without it being like bread,

only if it is lacking a Kizaius,

then Ham-o-tsi is not going to be made.

However,

in the Ar-ch-e-ch-ch-e-vrab,

and Simalam-e-zai,

he disagrees with the Magan-e-vrab,

he says, since when Ar-gamar says

the crumbling it up,

and then pressing it into a single mass,

then we make Ham-o-tsi,

that's only when it was baked at that stage,

but if a person went ahead and cooked that mass of dough,

it receives a bere-minimizo-nos

out of concern, perhaps,

that the pieces got stuck to each other,

through the cooking,

that's not considered

halachically from a perspective of halachha,

has attached one to the other,

and therefore,

it lost its surah-s-lacham,

it's no longer has the identity

of being bread,

it had prior,

when it was less than a Kazai's.

Another application of Magan-e-vrab discusses

is we take Matsa,

and we crush up the Matsa,

and we mix it with egg,

we mix it with oil,

to make ourselves a dish

that we want to eat on Pesach.

So it receives there,

the bracha is going to be Mizo-nos,

and the reason for this is because

you've changed the form of that food.

It was Matsa that you broke it down,

and the dish is also known as Matsa-bray,

and basically what's going on here

is because you've crushed up the pieces of the Matsa,

as long as you've crushed them to the size that's less than a Kazai's,

it's going to change its form,

and once it's been changed in that way,

going through that cooking process

is going to remove the hamotsi factor,

the fact that it was Matsa,

before this,

and it will go down now to the bracha of Mizo-nos.