MON MAR 16 8 AM Cornyn, Paxton trade barbs; was it wise to loosen TX auto inspections?

The internet is an amazing, but risky place.

Hey, Mark Davis for Incogni, I-N-C-O-G-N-I-N-Cogni.com.

Look it out for your privacy, reducing spam,

calls, junk, email, giving you peace of mind.

It's easy, sign up at Incogni.com.

They search the web to find you in databases

and people search sites.

Then they go to bat for you to remove

your personal information.

You can track progress through your dashboard.

They'll give you personal privacy reports.

So much of our lives are online with our information

just out there.

Take control.

It's too easy for the world to get

your personal information.

Not just addresses and phone numbers,

but purchase histories, even your political beliefs

to target you for nuisance ads and even cybercrime.

With the custom removal feature,

your dedicated privacy expert can take down

almost everything about you online.

So be smart in your online world.

Get protected with Incogni.

I-N-C-O-G-N-I-N-Cogni.

60% discount on a family plan with the promo code,

Mark Davis, so get protected today.

Incogni, I-N-C-O-G-N-I-N-Cogni.com.

Every morning is a new opportunity

to take in the news today and the challenges of life.

You try to make sense of it all.

Right now, we've got a show that tackles the topics

and asks what you think.

So get ready to start your day with a bold look

at history as it happens.

Let's learn, live, and sometimes laugh together.

It's the Mark Davis show.

On 660-A-M, the answer.

All right, everybody.

Glad to have you here.

It is our number two.

It is 808 here on the 16th day of March of frozen March 16th.

But hey, that's OK.

It will be in the 90s in a few days.

And no, I'm not kidding.

After the 80s yesterday, the 30s this morning,

ping, ping, ping.

The ricochet rabbit of weather forecasts.

Glad you are here.

Bundle up, bundle up for this day.

But we have hot topics to keep you warm.

Let's dive in, shall we?

866-660-5759.

A little bit of dovetail off of what Mike and I

were talking about about these podcast wars.

And it is so, I don't want to under-play it.

I don't want to over-play it.

It is so easy, especially, and I don't want to say like,

when you do what we do for a living.

But when you do what we do for a living,

or if you follow what we do for a living,

if you're just a big consumer of political media,

all right, it is so easy to get hip, deep, neck, deep to drown

in the latest thing that Megan Kelly

said about Mark Levin, and the latest thing

that Tucker Carlson's in trouble for,

about the latest craziness to come out of Candace Owens's mouth

about the latest thing that Ben Shapiro said.

Just, I'm just, I'm bored.

I mean, I'm not bored.

I'm disinterested, all right?

All those people who I've mentioned, some of them,

I continue to value.

Some of them I'm totally done with.

Some I'm partially done with, well, you want lists.

The totally done with list, Candace Owens.

She is a broken soul.

The probably done with until he pulls his head out

and gets his act together, Tucker Carlson.

The everybody out of the, the teetering

on the brink of your relevance, see Megan Kelly.

Megan Kelly the other day was whining

about what happened to this Kerry Praige on Boehler

on the Religious Liberty Commission at the White House,

which the young lady tried to hijack

as a soapbox for her bizarre faux alt-right anti-semitism.

She got bounced for that reason and continues to bellyache.

I got kicked off for my beliefs.

No, you didn't.

You kicked off because you were a irrelevant showboat

and not interested in the task of the commission

just as a vehicle for clicks for you and you're jugading.

So just blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Anyway, Mike said he pointed to an article

and I'm familiar with the article

that the right has a podcast problem

like our prevalence and our large footprint

in the world of podcasting and from Matt Walsh

to Megan Kelly to Tucker to Candace,

that's a lot of podcast downloads.

As a function of percentage to the entire country

as a function of percentage to all conservatives,

it just ain't that much.

And when you're living here in the bubble

or consuming large bites out of the bubble,

it's easy to think that the midterms are hurt

or do you think for a minute the turning point USA,

I mean, it can't help to have Candace Owens

spouting these bizarre otherworldly

attacks on Erica Kirk that she's some Jewish robot

or something, that's not helpful.

But turning point USA remains Charlie and it ran

and now in Erica's hands.

It remains one of the great bright lights

for the future of this country

in terms of bringing young people

both to conservatism and to Christ.

The notion that turning point is on the ropes

because of Candace Owens attacks on area,

I think a lot of people who have doubled down

on their support of turning point USA

because of these outlandish and skirless

and malicious attacks.

So no, I don't think that all the podcast broads

and podcast sisters are doing some horrible damage

to turning point, doing some horrible damage

to our midterm prospects.

Because again, I just think that when you boil it all down

the percentage of people paying, you gotta make it like a funnel.

How many people are there in America, 350 million?

How many conservatives, how many Republicans?

How many people who value turning point a lot?

How many people who used to value Candace?

A whole lot.

How many people who still do, curiously some.

A lot of people who used to value Tucker a lot.

How many people who still do some, Megan Kelly continues

to erode her own reputation with her peculiarities.

Levin remains steadfast and has not done anything

to be clowned himself, diddo Ben Shapiro.

So and a whole, and a lot of this,

a lot of this is, what's all this about?

You may be thinking one of the old sniping each other

about a lot of it's about Israel.

And a lot of people's latent or not so latent

anti-semitism has them looking at scants.

Look, if you're kind of,

if you've got that young person isolationist thing

brewing in your head, where you don't want to do anything

unless a foreign country's tanks are rolling down main street,

okay, you've got that.

And then you're Rand Paul Wing, you've got that.

Throw in a president in Trump,

whom you've decided to toss onto the ash heap

so that you can be part of some new vanguard

of new conservatism.

Reagan, that's for old people.

Reagan is for dead people, Trump is for old people.

And so it's time for this new wave

and they call themselves conservative,

but they often are not.

And it's about throwing Israel under the bus.

It's about throwing Trump under the bus.

A lot of times it's about throwing Jesus under the bus.

It's just, you know, burn the whole thing down

and we're gonna, we're gonna build a whole new infrastructure

and it's gonna be filled with clicks and podcasts

and all the cool kids and, you know,

we're not about any foreign, any foreign entanglements.

It's not just America first, it's America only.

And we're the smart kids and it's all gonna be awesome.

Right.

So in their attempts to do this

and in their ferocity involved in trying to assemble

this new house of cards,

there's a lot of burn to bridges.

But again, it's all taking place in this podcast space,

which is popular.

Listen, you got millions of downloads.

But a lot of it is the appeal of what makes you slow down

and look at a train wreck.

You know, Megan Kelly has a lot of followers.

She deserves it.

Mark Levin has a lot of listeners.

He deserves them.

And they are just,

just savaging each other.

In their respective shows and online.

I pay attention because I follow both of them.

I pay attention to what they have said.

And I value virtually everything of Levin

and I'm still much of Megan.

I hope she doesn't completely paint herself

into a corner of your relevance.

But the degree to which they are interested in just saying

terrible things about each other and to each other,

I'm just bored.

I don't care.

And I don't for one minute think that there,

you know what in contest is going to hurt it.

Are there any of you really?

Well, I don't know if I'm going to be voting Republican in November

because of the online war between Mark Levin and and Megan Kelly

or Ben Shapiro and Candace.

Oh, this affects your voting patterns.

I don't think so.

I will tell you what affects your voting patterns.

The notion, the notion that Republicans either can or cannot

get something done.

This Republican leadership either has its act together

or it doesn't.

If I can go ahead and pause, let me.

Can I go ahead and break your mat?

I'm going to, if it'll present me, it's okay.

And let's take a look at the very, very latest.

Our buddy Jack Fink over at Channel 11 did a really good piece

over the weekend about where this all stands with the Save America

Act, which vast majorities of not just Republicans want,

it's popular nationwide.

It's popular with independence.

It's popular with a majority of Democrats.

If I phrased something earlier that if the leadership is able

to drag this thing across the finish line,

they deserve credit for it.

Somebody has a really good take on the text line.

It's like, really, we're going to give people credit

for dragging something across the finish line,

which should have been able to do to pass easily

on its own merit, not a bad point.

But it is 2026 where even the easy has sometimes become hard.

And so in being the bottom line oriented person

that I'm in the mood to be of late on Save America Act

and the whole, how I feel about Republican leadership,

show me something.

We're all from Missouri, the show me state, show me something.

Walk, walk, walk, walk, talking is meaningless.

Show me something, flip some votes, bring people to heal,

bring people in line, pass the Save America Act,

then we'll see that you folks are worth something.

You fail at your peril.

All right, 818, Mark Davis, 660 AM, the answer.

That deer is just falling rain.

On Jerry Jeff Walker's birthday, I wanted

to find something special.

So I went to 1973 and the live album

called Viva Turlingua recorded at the Luke and Bach Dance Hall.

This is Little Bird.

Jerry Jeff would have been 84 today,

passed away back in 2020 called the Jimmy Buffett of Texas

by some great, great records.

Desperados waiting on a train up against the wall.

Great, the great Jerry Jeff Walker's birthday.

All right, 866, 660, 5759.

Jack Fink on, I on politics, the great channel 11 weekend

politics show, let off as they should have with what current events

this week may do, having an effect holding some sway over the date

that everybody has circled now.

Everybody has circled May 20, you know, the May 26 is the day after

Memorial Day, I know, but I look at a calendar talk,

showboy, a lot of times I'm gone Memorial Day week.

Not this year, are you kidding?

Obviously can't be gone that day and can't be gone the week before

because that'll be a home stretch.

Can you imagine what corn and impacts are going to be sand

to each other about each other in the week leading up to May 26th.

And then Memorial Day, I'll be Monday, get a half of mine

and come and do a Memorial Day show,

but the other half will probably prevail.

That'll probably be still a pretty inattentive day, exactly.

And I said, nobody will be listening.

So we'll, and then May 27th the day after,

but then we'll finally have an answer to the question.

Cornen or Paxton to go up against woke Opie,

their James Tallerico.

So anyway, Jack Fink on Channel 11 over the weekend.

The election integrity bill called the Save America Act

has now become front and center in their clash.

If approved, it will require voters show in-person proof

of citizenship to register to vote

and then show photo ID to vote.

President Trump calls it his number one priority

and it all comes following President Trump's comments

that he intends to endorse one candidate

and ask the other candidate to immediately drop out.

The House passed the Save Act and sent it to the Senate

where a majority leader, John Thune, has said

he will take action on it this week.

Uh-huh, we'll see how that works out.

A quick word on things the president has said.

He has said he will be endorsing, well, he said

he's going to endorse somebody.

He said, 10 minute now, I'm going to endorse somebody

and it was totally going to be cornered.

And then suddenly it wasn't.

I'm now back to my default setting

that I don't think he's going to endorse anybody

at the my list and it's Trump.

It could change at lunchtime.

I still believe there's a non-zero possibility

that he stays out of this, that he wisely,

wisely stays out of this

and let's and let's Texans decide.

And he once he does endorse, if he does, excuse me,

if he does, because I remain skeptical, skeptical

about the endorsement.

Does he actually, well, first of all,

in terms of asking the other person to get out,

that's not possible after tomorrow.

Is tomorrow the 17th?

Yep.

I think the deadline for, for I guess being removed

from the ballot, I guess you could be on the ballot,

but still just get out of the race to spend your campaign,

not show up anymore.

And as I've said, if there's one thing,

there's a lot of uncertainty,

there's a lot of moving parts,

a lot of things that can change.

One thing will not be changing.

18 point headlines, scrawled in Sharpie on your forehead.

No one is getting out of this race.

No one is getting out of this race.

No one will withdraw.

Oh, but if they offered corn and something,

oh, but if they offered packs,

oh, offer them what?

Be president.

That's about the only thing bigger

than the Senate seat that corn

and wants to keep and packs and wants to gain.

Well, they could make a ambassador to the,

or they could make a,

you can fire Bondy and make a major,

just stop it, just stop it.

Stop it.

So nobody's getting out of this thing.

So I remain skeptical about the endorsement

and no one will be, no one will be getting out.

Last week, Senator Cornen changed his longstanding view

to protect the filibuster,

which creates a threshold of 60 votes

to pass most legislation to help the Senate pass the save act.

In an op-ed for the New York Post,

Cornen said, quote,

after careful consideration,

I support whatever changes to Senate rules

that may prove necessary for us

to get the Save America Act

and Homeland Security funding passed

the Democrats' obstruction through the Senate

and on the president's desk for his signature.

This was met with a wall of skepticism.

There were reporters chasing Cornen down

and saying, you just, you very recently said

that the Senate would collapse

if we got rid of the filibuster.

Do you just simply no longer believe that?

He was in no mood to be questioned further about this,

which led people to say things

like he didn't even write the op-ed,

led people to think that John Thun was just giving him cover

to save the right things

so that people would stop bludgeoning him

for being on board for keeping the filibuster forever.

And that ultimately, John Thun will be the bad cop

enabling Cornen to be the good cop

and the thing's gonna fail anyway.

And Senator Cornen will be able to shrug and go,

I tried.

Well, I'm here to tell you that ain't gonna be enough.

So we're very bottom line oriented.

Jack had more on channel 11.

You've got more and 866-660-5759.

Grab a line, Mark Davis, more of you, more of me,

more of us all together here on a Frosty Monday.

It's 830, Mark Davis, 660 AM the answer.

And in the newsroom, we go, here's Mary Rose.

Man, oh, man, we got a Texas feel to today's musical selections.

And the birthdays are why?

We did Jerry Jeff Walker.

And now, it's some asleep at the wheel

and miles and miles of Texas.

Because Ray Benson is 75.

Last time I saw a sleep at the wheel,

was it Dickies and Fort Worth?

They opened for George Strait November 2019.

Check them out on the road.

See, I don't even catch them.

Catch them with a small venue like Down Green Hall by New Braunfels.

Or as many people say, New Braunfell.

Oh, Bob Will's alive and well.

In the discography of a sleep at the wheel, already 866-660-5759.

Let's mix in some calls.

I'm going to get to what Paxton had to say

about the cornon air quotes reversal

on the filibuster.

We'll find out if that's real in the coming days.

We shall see.

But we've got all kinds of things going on coming off

a weekend news and a week of experiences and weekend stuff.

866-660-5759.

We are in Prosper, Beth.

Mark Davis, welcome.

How are you?

Good morning and doing pretty well.

Howdy.

Hi.

I'm the theme of the Texas with your music.

One of the things that born and raised Texan,

one of the things that's concerned me

and I thought it would probably change.

I think it passed last year in the Texas legislature

or previous to that.

But when you go in and get your car

registered, you have to go in for an inspection

before you get your car registered.

He used to be all my years.

You would go in and they would check for safety

for your vehicle, but then also emissions, of course.

Now they only check for emissions

and they don't do any safety check on that register.

And the emissions are only in,

because you're in Prosper, Colin County.

I mean, Dallas, Terrent, Colin, Denton.

I don't know what the other heavy emissions counties are.

And in a lot of Texas, there was no inspection at all.

What do we think of that?

I just, I mean, if you're, in fact, I spoke to the gentleman

who checks me in to do the inspection.

And I said, this is crazy.

I said, I would prefer to have my car

and every vehicle on the road with me in Texas

inspected for safety over emissions.

And he said, I agree.

I said, I am appalled that this is still in place.

I mean, what you're talking about driving on the road

with vehicles who are not inspected for safety,

it's very concerning.

And I'm surprised that Texas is doing this.

And I know if you're saying it's county based, not state.

Well, the state got rid of just about all inspections.

We were keeping a hold of the emissions inspection

in some of our more urbanized counties.

So if I were, and you're right, it was 2025.

It took, excuse me, past in 2023,

took effect January 1st of last year.

And I'll tell you, old magamaze was on board for that

in Bob Hall and Cody Harris.

This was a big conservative talking point.

And I remember, it's interesting

that you've sort of resurrected this

because I always found it one of the sort

of one of the more interesting debates

because is it intrusive?

Does government need to be dogged

in you for an inspection for your car, et cetera?

The large conservative argument was no.

But yet here, I don't think you feel like a big lib

saying that maybe there's a general interest

in having people see if your car's about to fall apart

on LBJ.

Exactly my point, or 75, or toll road.

I mean, when I'm driving,

I have elderly parents still driving.

Have my adult children driving, my husband, I,

I don't want to be on the road with people

whose cars have not been inspected for safety.

And they just don't take the time to,

I just, I think if you're keeping anything,

you're keeping the safety inspection, not the emissions.

Yeah, that matters more to me than the emissions.

Yeah, understand.

Well, thank you for bringing it.

Listen, I'm glad to add it to the slate here

and see what folks think on the occasion of your experience

because things that people do and bring them to me

can often take flight.

And yeah, just bend the ear, maybe of your,

when you speak to the state legislator, legislators,

senators, whatever, I mean,

this would be something I would bring up to them

because I am shocked that it's still in play.

Well, let me see how, let me see how widespread that is.

But thank you, appreciate it very, very much.

So here were, here were the basics of that battle.

The folks who were proponents of the bill

said that the mandatory safety inspection program

that the effect on overall road safety was negligible.

Modern vehicle, I mean, Beth's point is some older people

and older cars are younger people

and older cars, blah, blah, blah.

Modern vehicles are more reliable.

They had did some studies in comparisons with other states

showing that there were minimal safety benefits

from requiring these annual checks.

Most US states had already eliminated similar programs.

And then it also struck people as a, as an unnecessary burden.

Cost you time, cost you money.

So getting rid of it saves you the hassle,

especially in rural areas,

where there are limited inspection stations.

It, I remember one of the big arguments was your car

on, out there on the roads,

that's a personal responsibility thing for you.

It was viewed as inefficient.

There was, as there always will be,

there were claims of fraud and abuse, fake passes,

the upselling unnecessary repairs,

it's some of the shops, et cetera, et cetera.

So that was the argument for getting rid of the safety inspections.

Now, it's funny.

I remember law enforcement kind of liked them.

Inspection station owners surely did.

Safety advocates, whatever that means, safety advocate.

They said that it could increase the risk by removing a proactive check

for things like bald tires, faulty brakes,

bad liked one seat belt, et cetera, et cetera.

But the legislature put all this in a big hopper,

took a look at the pros of deregulation and efficiency

and said, listen,

this is a personal responsibility thing for the drivers,

for you, the operators of your private vehicles.

So was that a good idea?

Do we want that one back?

866, 660, 5759.

How many of you all share a Beth's desire to turn back the clock

and not turn back the clock?

Well, yeah, to undo that.

You don't, you don't like that.

What about me?

I think she has a point.

How big a point?

How big a danger is this?

Part of this stereotype,

but it kind of depends on what neighborhood you're driving through, don't you?

No, no, no, not that there are neighborhoods where there's nothing,

but clean and brand new and magnificently maintained cars.

But there are some, I mean, it's kind of economic.

If you're, you know, rolling down a street,

rolling through a neighborhood where the newest thing you got

is a 94 Taurus.

You know, you might be a little more of a dangerous stretch of road,

you know, and then headed through Mockingbird in the Highland Park.

Oh, I'm sorry, my little Highland Park joke

was in Highland Park the other day.

Saw a bumper sticker, said my other cars and Mercedes.

It was on a Mercedes.

Anyway, 866, 660, 5759.

All right.

So previously on Ion, Texas politics,

they're in Channel 11 with Jack Fink.

He was at the end of the John Corden quote

from his New York post op-ed about being willing

to change the filibuster, all of a sudden.

And as here's the tail end of that

and the, and the, and the Paxton reaction thereafter.

I respectfully urge the remaining handful

of my Republican colleagues still holding

onto the old position that I used to share

to reassess the new reality and update their thinking.

In a post on X, Paxton responded by saying quote,

John Corden did exactly what I predicted.

In one week, I've made him more conservative

than in the past 24 years.

We spoke with Republican consultant Vinnie Minchillo

about what this all means for the runoff

and the potential endorsement by President Trump.

But first, I wanted his thoughts on the primary results.

I was surprised by two things that that, you know,

obviously, whisker-close race by, you know,

less than two points.

But I was surprised that Corden came out ahead of Paxton

and I was really surprised how poorly Paxton performed

in his home county in Colin County.

That's right, because he actually was behind Corden.

Most of the night, over 90 came back

and he won by 900 votes.

Right.

And so what does that say to you?

You know, that says to me a couple of things.

He's got problems in Colin County,

but certainly Colin County knows him best,

both the good and the bad.

I don't know if you could extrapolate that to the whole state,

but to me, that would be a red flag,

if I was the Paxton campaign.

What kind of impact would that have

when the president does make an endorsement, if he does?

Right.

And I think he will, you know, he usually,

when he says he's going to do something, he will do it.

Hmm.

Can broad policy wise?

Absolutely.

You know, I'm going to fix the border.

He does it.

I'm going to cut taxes.

He does it.

I'm going to bomb Iran.

He does it.

Other things that are kind of window dressing

in political theater and change those on a dime.

But I will tell you, the Paxton people feel like

there is a world where they win the runoff,

even if President Trump endorsed his corner.

100% true.

100% true.

I could fill these phone lines right now

with people who are from the Paxton base who say they love Trump.

Thank God he won.

Thank God he won.

Thank God he won.

But the endorsement of the corner does not budge them one bit.

Now would it budge some people?

Sure.

But how many?

Don't know.

So that's their opinion over there.

But I think if the president comes out,

he was very smart in his statement,

because he said he's not only good at endorse,

but he expects the non-endorced candidate

to pull out of the race.

So it's sort of a two-fer.

If he endorses John Cornyn,

he's got to make the second half of that come true

and get Paxton out of the race.

Zero, zero chance of that.

How many times can I tell you, zero chance of that?

I'm not sure that's going to be so easy.

Paxton then reset the argument.

And making it all about the SAV Act,

which is something that President Trump

wholeheartedly supports.

Was that a really brilliant move on the Paxton part?

Very good move on their part.

You know, for the most part, Cornyn impacts.

I mean, if you look at their voting record,

despite the ads and everything they say,

their voting record would be very, very similar in the Senate.

I don't think there's very any big things

they would be a part on.

Except for this, I mean, there's a perception

that John Cornyn is holding up the SAV Act,

whether he is or not, we don't know.

And then Paxton, of course,

very wholeheartedly in favor of the SAV Act

and to support President Trump.

So for the Paxton people, very smart move,

it aligns him completely with President Trump

and puts him across the table from John Cornyn.

Of course, Cornyn today, as we talk,

has written an op-ed in the New York Post,

basically saying that he wants to pass the SAV Act.

Does that neutralize this threat?

You will have to see as the deal goes on.

And as the week goes on, and as this week goes on,

it's today's day one of a brand new work week.

And all eyes will be on in particular,

so-called leader, John Foon,

to see just how much leading he can actually do.

866-660-5759, Mark Davis, 849.

866-660-5759, we are in Dallas.

Don, Mark Davis, welcome. How are you?

Good morning.

Hey.

I'm one of your radical left lunatic listeners.

Thank you. Thank you for self-identifying.

It's kind of a joke.

But, uh,

I, uh,

I, uh,

I, uh,

I, uh,

I, uh,

I, uh,

I, uh,

I, uh,

I, uh,

I, uh,

I, uh,

I, uh,

I, uh,

I, uh,

I, uh,

I,2019,

I, Aufril Nyерш Doesne 병 euندle,

but, uh,

I,

from our side of the stance,

whenever,

any,

and, uh,

Hillary were running against each other.

And, uh,

the diehearted people thought there was a thumb on the scale.

Some of those people absolutely would not vote for Hillary.

After that.

And I would try to talk,

you know,

tell them,

like,

Just do it for the Supreme Court and they wouldn't listen.

And I think probably you're right

about somebody,

probably, you know,

And you are going to turn off some people if you do this because it also hurt our side

with the Kamala Biden thing people do not like it whenever they perceive that the higher

powers, whoever they are put their thumb on this.

Absolutely.

Right.

If there's one thing that the left and the right have experienced hand in hand, it's the

notion of lofty ivory tower establishment figures trying to tell real voters what to

do.

The Bernie bros were rightfully up in arms because everybody had their thumb on the scale

for Hillary.

The establishment when Trump went up against, you know, 14, 15 people on stage and everybody

said he has no chance.

The one thing Trump did was unify.

He did like the Democrat establishment or the Republican establishment.

And so that's you're you're 100% right.

In our last minute or two, 20, 28, if you advance or, you know, Rubio or who what else,

who would you like your nominee to be in 28, do you think?

Well, I'm a, I'm, I'm, I, I am a liberal.

So neither one of those guys that I had to choose one, I would choose Rubio.

No, no, no, no, that's right.

That'd be running against no on, on your side.

I mean, I don't for one minute on the, in the, the spirit of what you're talking about.

I don't for one minute that believe that most Democrats want to look back and go exume

Kamala Harris.

I also think that I'm hoping, I'm hoping there's an Obama situation where there's

somebody that we haven't seen yet.

I think that's our best hope is that.

I mean, there's some people I think that could win still, but I think our best hope

would be there's someone we were not even on the radar at the moment.

I have also said that's a bomb, a bomb of super power.

He did, but it came seem to come out of all.

I remember standing in Boston in 2004 at the John Kerry convention where more Barack

Obama delivered the keynote and all the conservative talk show guys we all looked at each other

and went, uh, oh, I remember that, I remember it well, I remember it well myself.

Exactly.

I'm hoping that's the scenario we're in.

Well, now listen, well, you never, you know, well, as the establishment of party has

its thumb on the scale, but ultimately it is real voters and listen, thank you for

getting in touch.

I deeply, deeply appreciate it.

Thanks for listening.

And thanks for calling 866 660 575 9, all right, in our 9 o'clock hour, we got all

kinds of other things to get to stuff I haven't even gotten to yet.

And a surprise city council race win from somebody whom you know got national attention

over the weekend.

What?

Details next, Mark Davis 660 AM the answer.