MON MAR 30 9 AM RR commission candidate @BoFrench; Rubio on GMA

24 hours a day, seven days a week.

The news never stops.

Life goes on around town and around the world.

You need a talk show that keeps track of it,

a program with the bold opinions

that's always open to your views.

That is this show.

Welcome to the Mark Davis show on 660 A.M.

The answer.

All right, everybody, hour number three.

On this penultimate, great word next to last,

penultimate day of March.

Tomorrow, March is over the year is one quarter over.

Holy cow, April 1st, not to dork out.

I'll dork out on you a lot more tomorrow.

But it looks like we're getting, well, fingers crossed.

Our Artemis 2 launch, we're sending people back to the moon.

Not to land, we're going to fly by, bring it on back.

And that crew ready to go on a launch

that should be sometime between about 6.30 and 8.30

hour time on, or is it 5.37, 30?

I'll check my time zones for Wednesday evening.

Wednesday evening, April 1st.

More on that, I guarantee you.

What we're taking our clock toward and moving the calendar

toward in the political world is, of course, the May 26th runoff.

So we've talked a little bit about how the Paxton corn

and race seems to be going.

That is also the Mays Middleton Ship Roy battle for attorney

general.

And we have a railroad commission race to take a look at

in which the incumbent Jim Wright faces a challenge

from former Terrent County GOP chair, Bo French, who joins us

welcome, sir, how you doing?

Good morning, Mark, great to be here.

Nice to have you.

Let's talk a little bit about the race and then other stuff

in the news because as long as we've known each other,

you are ready to talk about other stuff in the news.

In the actual primary march there, you and Mr. Wright,

both got like right at 32%.

There were like three other people running.

Do you, what's the math?

Did you need to garner votes from all the other people running?

Do you think you've done that?

What's the path to victory on May 26th?

Yeah, I think just top line, if you look historically

in Texas, statewide runoffs have been very good

for the more conservative candidate.

It's out 10 crews was elected to tell attorney general

compact and was elected.

So I feel good about where we're starting.

If you look at the vote total of Jim Wright, though,

he received the lowest reelection vote total

in the history of the railroad commission.

So I think that the voters are ready for a change.

So I'm excited about where we are right now.

It comports right with my, the Mark Davis rule

of primaries.

You could be awesome, but you're not going to win

unless there is a desire to fire the incumbent.

What's the matter with him?

What would be a reason to say thanks, time for private life?

Well, I mean, what really encouraged me

to run in the first place was he spearheaded

the largest increase in environmental regulations

on the oil and gas industry.

And that does a couple of things.

One, it raises costs on operators.

I mean, the oil and gas industry

is our most important industry in Texas.

I would argue it has a national security implications.

It's, it's, you know, we produce roughly,

or almost half the oil and gas in the United States.

Trump obviously views it as a national security issue

when he's looking at Venezuela and Iran,

the first and third largest oil reserves in the world.

But when you increase those environmental regulations,

really like think Obama or Biden EPA type regulations

on the oil and gas industry.

So by raising costs on the industry,

what you've done is you jeopardize jobs.

And you've made it harder for, you know, competition

to effectively lower oil prices,

which clearly would be better for consumers.

So there needs to be a fine line

between the regulations that we need to protect the land.

I'm a rancher.

I have a ranch in the middle of an oil field.

So I completely want to protect our land and our waters.

But we also have to have an appropriate mix of regulations

so that oil and gas operators can extract the oil we need

from the ground in a cost-efficient manner.

Because that's just, that's just good for everybody.

It's good for jobs and good for consumers.

Bo, French is here running for Railroad Commission,

having been here in County GOP chair.

We've talked about a lot of things over the years.

There were a lot of things on the slate at CPAC.

I talked about what some of the poll numbers were,

what that gathering was like.

You were on a panel we'll talk about here in a second,

but just walking into that, you've done some CPACs before.

We've all, you know, sort of made the scene there

in some fashion.

Was there something different about this one?

I had people say this one seemed different.

Some ways in good ways, some ways.

What was the vibe of the event as you discerned it?

Well, I have to tell you, this was my first CPAC.

So I didn't really have a frame of reference.

But my observation was, you know,

I think they sold 4,000 tickets,

which I think is a record.

I'm not really sure.

It seemed very well attended.

You know, there was a lot going on.

The galore, as you know, is massive.

So it was very spread out.

So there might have been times when, you know,

something was going on in one of the conference rooms,

but, you know, not another.

And so the crowds might have been, you know,

I know there were some photos that went around

and I think it seemed like nobody was there.

But I mean, everything I went to was crowded

and the energy was high.

It was really an incredible event.

So many great patriots there.

Look, you know, the Republican Party,

the conservative movement is kind of a big tent, obviously.

I mean, everyone knows where I stand.

You know, I'm very conservative.

And there are people, you know, in, in, you know,

everywhere you go that don't necessarily,

I agree with 100% of the time, but that's okay.

You know, we're all conservatives.

We're all fighting for America.

And, you know, sometimes we disagree

on the best way to do that.

But, you know, being in America first warrior

means, you know, fighting battles

both outside the party and within.

The CPAC vibe tends to be sort of the Trump friendly,

MAGA friendly portion of our party,

which is the majority portion of our party.

That's how you get a Paxton Cornon straw poll

of 6721 for Ken.

I don't think that's going to happen on May 26th,

but it sure does look like Ken has the upper hand.

And I, you've done so, have done or will do

some joint appearances with him, correct?

Yeah, for sure.

Next week, we're having a big campaign kickoff party

in the stockyards and, and,

and compactions going to be there also.

So it should be a lot of fun.

Look, I mean, his race clearly is a similar dynamic.

John Cornon, you know, 60% of the people voted against him.

In my race, 70% of the people voted against him.

So I think it's, you know, we have a similar dynamic there.

But, you know, John Cornon is not been a favorite

among the grassroots for some time now.

So I think, I think there is that desire in the Mark Davis world.

So in that, there you go.

It's famous.

So in that, in that CPAC room,

they did a presidential straw poll too.

Vance 53, Rubio 35, DeSantis 2.

And nobody has anything against DeSantis.

He's great.

It's just there is a, I meant, listen, you know,

what's your thought?

There's just, there's a wish for it when the Trump era

is truly over, at least the Donald Trump senior era is over.

For somebody who's as close to a mega warrior as him as we can get.

Yeah, I think, you know, the mistake would be to look at a poll like that

and think that 98% of the people do not like Ron DeSantis.

That's just not the case.

I mean, he's clearly been a very, you know, one of the best governors

in the country and certainly among, among the top five.

So it's not, it's not a knock on him.

It's really, it's just, I think that the movement is really embraced

what Shady Vance has said.

Marco Rubio is also very popular.

So, you know, I think we have, we have a, we're very fortunate on our side.

We have a very deep bench and extremely talented people who, you know,

sort of fit in different, different aspects of the, of the American first

mega movement.

And so we'll see what happens, you know, come, come primaries in the two years.

So, last CPAC question, which was the reason you were there was to be on a panel

and boy, this is a major theme these days coming off.

A lot of people running for a lot of different audio offices.

And the panel was called Don't Sharia My Textes.

Describe the room to me.

Who's on the panel with you?

Who showed up for that?

Yeah, I mean, my really good friend, Jenny Story from Patriot Mobile was on the panel.

And she and I have worked together on a number of different gatherings of folks

who are really, you know, frankly, just concerned about the direction of our state in terms

of, you know, this seemingly out of nowhere growth of mosques and Islamic influence in

our state.

And I think, you know, it's been actually happening for a long time and go back to the

Holy Land Foundation trials and there has been people here funding Paris Networks overseas

for some time.

So I think that all of that kind of together, it really just blew up into, you know,

I, of course, I have been talking about this for a couple of years now and was, was criticizing

within my own party early on, but it seems like the over-to-window has shifted in my direction.

When I traveled to the state, Mark, every time I go into a room, I ask people who's

worried about the Islamification of Texas and without fail, 100% of the people in the

room raised their hand.

And so it is something that voters are concerned about and clearly, this campaign season,

you've seen every single candidate talk about it in Texas.

So that's happened.

You know, there's the news.

We're anchoring Sharia caucuses in both Congress and the Texas legislature that are still

growing and adding members.

So it is certainly something that I think is, and of course, we have the proposition in

March to ban, you know, one expressing our desire to ban Sharia in Texas.

So I think that this is a growing focus for the elected officials in Texas.

I think it is something that we are going to continue to see be focused on until, until

we actually get the results we want.

Whether it's Islamification or Shia or Sharia, everybody always asks, like, to quantify

something.

How big of a problem is it?

And I don't think something needs to become a pervasive problem before we address it.

How about if we nip it in the bud before it becomes pervasive?

On immigration in general, I need to run a quote by you.

Did you say we have 100 million people in the country who shouldn't be here, like a third

of the country?

Well, what I'm talking about is, you know, since 1965, we've imported millions and millions

of people from third world countries who don't share our values.

You know, immigration up to that point was very much people who shared our values.

We've had a lot of people who come here and we see this everywhere.

Look at all of the legal immigrants in Minnesota, the Somalis.

They're not assimilating.

They're actively defrauding our taxpayers and then they're seeing more interested in funneling

money back to Somalia and doing things for Americans.

So there's problems like that that I think people are waking up to.

I don't know what the exact number is, but I've read estimates that there are 50 million

illegal aliens in the country and I think most people agree that illegal aliens should

not be here.

And, you know, there was a report last year from the State Department about, you know,

re-vetting 55 million foreign visa holders.

So I don't know what the exact numbers are.

Former Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bavino said that there were 100 million that needed

to be deported.

So I'm just, you know, sort of aggregating all of these different things.

But the bottom line is there are a lot of people who shouldn't be here and I think that

the voters are waking up to the idea that probably most of them should be removed from

the country.

If we're going to save our country, save our culture, these are important things to voters.

There's the issue of illegal immigration and the issue of legal, like how many people

we let in, who we intentionally let in.

Do you think we have a big H1B, or two H1B questions?

Number one, do we have, are we letting too many people in legally?

Number two, under the H1B program, everybody's taken a look at Plano, Frisco, all these stories

about the so-called Indian takeover, where rules are being bent and we're just getting

as flood of Indian immigrants for the low-cost labor, is that on your radar?

Well, for sure.

I think there are a couple of things.

One, for every H1B visa we bring in, an American is not getting a job.

And so I think a lot of people are just disenchanted with that notion.

And then, when you look at just the way that they're doing it, I think roughly 80% of

H1B visas are Indian.

And of course, we've discovered the diploma mill in India, where they're literally creating

fake documents for people, so that they can qualify for these visas when they don't actually

have the qualifications that they're supposed to have, they just have a fake document.

And so I think that rubs people the wrong way.

And then, you've seen the great work by people like Sarah Gonzalez, and going to these

supposed headquarters of these consulting firms with hundreds of H1B employees, and they

get there and it's just a house in Plano, or a house in Frisco.

So clearly, there's a lot of fraud going on, and I don't think anyone really knows the

extent to what it all is or what the amount is, but it clearly needs to be addressed

in a lot of people, not just me, or had called for, you know, pausing H1B visas in re-evaluating

all of them.

Let's make sure that the jobs go to Americans who deserve them.

I don't know if you saw over the last week, there was a report that a lot of these medical

school placements were prioritizing foreigners over Americans.

So why aren't the Americans who graduated medical school getting these residencies?

I think, by the way, our friend Mary Taliban.

So, you know, I think there's just a lot of, a lot of facets to all of these issues.

They're complex, of course.

The general theme is, you know, in 2024, Americans voted for mass deportations in America

first.

Those are kind of the big things.

And so it just seems like we keep discovering more and more and more things that have happened

that are counter to that.

And so there is frustration, and some, we take a hard look at these things.

The Railroad Commissioner campaign website is bowfrench.com, and, of course, the, of

actual, the, finally, the primary season will come to an end with the May 26th runoff.

Thank you, man.

Appreciate it.

I know we'll talk again soon.

Thanks for being here.

Great to be here, Mark.

Thank you so much.

Bowfrench bowfrench.com is the website 923.

It is quite the day of birthday.

So obviously Eric Clapton is 81.

Sullyne Dion is 58.

Grapefine's own Nora Jones is 47th.

Yeah, she sold a couple of copies of this, one of the armload of Grammys in 2003.

The album was come away with me.

This, of course, is don't know why I don't know why people keep saying that that nobody

knows what the goals of the war are George Stephanopoulos on Good Morning America today.

They welcomed Marco Rubio and and Stephanopoulos tried to hit him once again with we don't

have clear objectives.

We don't have clear objectives.

So Marco wanted a word and here it is in just a second.

Here we go.

Yeah.

So the whole thing that people have been saying for, I just, I think it just lost it and

just that.

That's my cue to get into bottom of the hour on time.

866, 660, 575, 90 basically said, just make, make a list here, here's a list of what

we wanted to do.

It's clear what we wanted to do from the outset.

It was to destabilize, was to defang the Iranian nuclear capability in the region toward

Israel and also around the entire region.

It was to stabilize, to bring stability to an unstable oil market that continues to

run the engines of the Western world.

And so when you take a look at all those things, it's pretty clear what we're trying to

do.

Is it a clear path of where we'll be in a week or a month or even a year?

Nope.

There's a leap of faith that people are being asked to engage in and most conservatives

are, most Republicans are, people who hate Trump's guts are decidedly not.

I get that.

So I'll have the Rubio quote for you, a couple of other things that people are saying.

Let's find out what you're saying about various things in the news this weekend.

And coming into the brand new week, 866, 660, 575, 9, it is 930, Mark Davis, Nikki

Whaley in the newsroom.

Quite the birthday for the ladies.

As I said, Celine Dion is 58, Nora Jones 47, Tracy Chapman is 62, few years after fast

car on an album called New Beginning.

You got to make me change my mind.

She is with Gini One reason.

All right.

Let's give you some reasons to get in touch.

866, 660, 575, 9.

Here's a little bit of a found Marco.

I found, I found Marco Rubio on with Stephanopoulos this morning on Good Morning America.

And the, and it's funny because a certain contrarian flavor from journalism is fine.

Challenging those in power is fine, asking probing questions is fine.

But I always find a kind of a nitpicking and a naysaying and what seems like, I'm sorry,

cheerleading for failure.

This is, I don't need the media culture to be an amen chorus for every military operation

or, I don't, I don't need them to, to be wearing mega hats.

But with each additional burst of coverage, it seems like the legacy, so-called legacy media

outlets like ABC are, are, are they just don't want this thing to succeed?

Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, Mr. Secretary, thank you for joining us this morning.

Let's talk about the president's comments over when I talking about taking the oil on

Carg Island.

How would he do this?

Why would he do this?

Want to take ground troops?

Well, first of all, it's important to remember the objectives of this operation from the

very beginning where we were going to, we are destroying Iran's Navy.

We are destroying their ability to, their missile launchers by a significant percentage.

We're going to wipe out their defense industrial base, meaning their ability to make new missiles

and new drones in the future because it pulls a great threat to the region.

This Iran that you're seeing now, this is Iran at its weakest point.

Even them two years from now, if they had thousands of more missiles, the thousands of

more missile launchers and factories to make even more, that was an unacceptable risk.

It needed to be addressed, and President Trump is addressing it.

Now, they are making threats about controlling the hormones, straits, and perpetuity, creating

a tolling system and the like.

That's not going to be allowed to happen.

And the president has a number of options available to him if he so chooses to prevent that

from happening.

Obviously, I'm not going to discuss what those options are, and we're not going to discuss

military tactics.

The Department of War would be in charge of those things.

I'd refer you to them, but obviously they're not going to discuss it with you either.

But there is a way forward here to achieve our objectives.

We are going to achieve our objectives in a matter of weeks now.

Okay.

Moving on later on, they were talking about the, so are there, it's funny, if there's

an observation people made as last week wound down and as the weekend came and went, it

was that it seemed that two things were happening at the same time.

That there were signals about talks, about resolving this, while by the same token, things

were ramping up.

How can both of those be the case at the same time, Secretary Rubio on GMA?

But the president just had this post where he says we're in discussions with a new and

more reasonable regime.

Let me try to pin you down on that.

Who is this new and more reasonable regime is United States' indirect contact with them?

Well, I'm not going to disclose to you who those people are because it probably would

get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran.

Look, there's some fractures going on there internally.

And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything

that's happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that

would be great.

Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting

terrorist or weapons had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you'd have a much

different country.

So, we are always hopeful that that would exist over there.

It's unfortunate.

The people of Iran are incredible people.

The people who lead them, these, this clerical regime, that is the problem.

And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future,

that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world.

But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability that that is not

the case.

But the president says they are.

Is that the case or is it not?

I'm just trying to get some clarity on that.

What I mean is, yeah, you have people that are saying some of the right things privately.

Obviously, they're not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you

or put out there for the world doesn't necessarily reflect what they're saying in our conversations.

But at the end of the day, we have to see if these people end up being the ones in charge,

seeing if they're the ones that have the power to deliver.

We're going to test it.

We are hopeful that that's the case.

There are clearly people they are talking to us in ways that previous people in charge

and Iran have not spoken to us in the past.

Some of the things they're willing to do, some of the things they're saying they're willing

to do.

Obviously, they have to go do it.

We're going to test that proposition very strongly because we always prefer to settle

things through negotiation and diplomacy.

But we also have to be prepared for the fact that that effort might fail, that we are dealing

with a 47-year-old regime that still has a lot of people involved in it.

But every time Rubio is on, every time he's just out there in the second most important

job in the country, which might be the second most important job of the world, after the

President, I mean, the Vice President is JD Hanz, who continues to be awesome.

But boy, hands on the world, a stride of the various trouble spots, negotiating all

of them with a kind of a clarity and a, remember this old word, gravitas, Rubio's stock is

on the rise.

It just is, it just is, Vance won the, Vance won the CPAC straw poll, Rubio not far behind.

And we got some time here, and I'm going to sit here in March of 2026 and identify exactly

how this needs to go.

Rubio has, of course, said that if Vance does run, that he won't.

And I have said, that's a problem, because I respect their friendship, their friendship

is great.

I want everybody in the administration to be friendly toward each other.

They seem to have a bond and a kinship that is great, it just adds to their effectiveness.

I feel, I hear from all of you often, that this is a choice you'd like to make.

That, that the note, it's called a good problem to have, the opportunity to have a JD

Vance, a Marco Rubio, if brother to Santis wants to, it's funny, it'll be another opportunity

for poor Ron DeSantis, who is awesome to probably just get shunned by the marketplace again.

Not because he's not great, but because when he ran before Trump was already running,

we wanted Trump.

And I think the tastes of the party, as we get toward 2028 and make no mistake, the minute

we finish with the midterms, the morning of November 4th, the elections November 3rd,

the morning of November 4th, the 2028 presidential election begins that morning.

It just does.

Everybody can start running for president of Iowa, president of New Hampshire.

You won't see as much moving and grooving, shaking and bacon from people who are already

in the administration, like JD Vance, like Marco Rubio, they'll probably keep their powder

dry for a little bit.

But you'll see other people start to make their, they're, you won't always get the exploratory

committee.

Got to have the exploratory committee.

And I think right off of this, as a voter, I would love to see, I would love to take

stock in the beginning of 2027, as the 2027 campaign year rolls forward and people

start announcing as, you know, summer, spring turns to summer turns to fall.

See what Rubio's got, see what JD Vance has got, see what other people have got.

Go ahead, bring it.

I mentioned earlier, the, and I don't want to blanket conclude that it's ridiculous for

Rand Paul to be running.

He says there's a 50, 50 chance that seems like a complete exercise in ego.

He's going to get stomped.

It's not because people hate him.

It's because that his brand of contrarian isolationism is just not the flavor of Republican

America today.

It's just not where conservatism lives, generally speaking.

Now, there, there are conservatives who are very war hesitant.

There are Republicans who are like, whoa, what is this?

It looks like we're nation-building.

They're, they're, they're gun shy, literally.

They are just not wanting to even be involved in this at all.

I get it.

Nothing succeeds like success.

And when this is a success, and I believe that it will be, the naysayers will be brought

back into the fold.

So speaking of ABC yesterday morning, their guy, Matt Rivers, who is in Qatar at a little

piece on, it was the, the side of this war story that is are, are people trying to negotiate

some kind of wrap up to this.

The first signs of a diplomatic off-ramp for the war in Iran began to emerge this week,

but the military back and forth going full steam ahead.

And on Friday, 2200 U.S. Marines arriving in the Middle East, with more troops set to

follow them.

As the United States and Israel continue their missile barrage on Iran, where authorities

say more than 3,000 people have been killed in the war.

President Trump on Friday giving an outline of what the U.S. still intends to hit, but providing

no clarity on what comes after that.

We have another 3,554 targets left.

Not providing clarity on what comes after that.

This is what I mean.

The nitpicking, the naysaying, the hectoring, oh, we need, we need an absolute 50 page white

paper on exactly how this is going to be going in July.

Have you seen a war before?

Have you seen an operation?

What its plans are?

What its intent is?

They say that no battle plan ever actually survives the battlefield.

So that's just nitpicking from people who don't want this to succeed.

Iran responding to the latest onslaught with retaliatory strikes across the region.

This video posted on social media showing the moment in Iranian missile struck in Tel Aviv,

leaving at least one person dead.

And this satellite image showing the destruction at a U.S. base in Saudi Arabia from an Iranian

drone attack that sources tell ABC News left at least 15 American service members injured.

Five of those troops were seriously wounded, bringing the total American troops injured

in the conflict to more than 300 with 13 left dead.

And John, despite those diplomatic efforts emerging this week between the United States

and Iran, Israel has actually ramped up their attacks.

Israeli defense minister Israel Katz said on Friday, the IDF would quote, escalate and

expand strikes in Iran and just hours later, Iran reported overnight strikes by Israel

on its nuclear facilities and steel factories.

So where does this all stand as we begin a new week?

As we take a look at what is likely to pan out, when I said it seems contradictory, that

we can ramp up and still diplomatically engage at the same time, they're not because sometimes

the appearance, the reality of a more aggressive military stance, the notion that we might

actually take over Carg Island, the major oil processing territory there.

It's about half the size of the island of Manhattan, right there off the Iranian coast

in the Persian Gulf, the threat of a Carg Island operation, the notion of 3,500

sailors and Marines who have reached the Middle East and more on the way.

That kind of ramp up, that kind of cranking it up to 11 is the kind of thing that might

persuade whatever that Iranian faction is that is dealing constructively with us.

It might be the kind of thing that convinces them, you've heard the old, the oldest saying

in the book, this is the language they understand.

Well, this is the language they understand.

And if they understand that we mean business, then maybe that's the kind of thing that yields

some diplomatic success.

So that's the hope.

And last thing, because, oh, won't that be boots on the ground?

Is it technically a boot or two on the actual ground?

It is.

And there are those who said, it's funny, I mentioned this earlier in somebody on the

text line said, well, that's moving the goalposts.

And I said that boots on the ground, to me has always meant a major extended deployment

by a large, I mean, tens of thousands, if not more, into a country to be there, set

up bases and stay there for the foreseeable future.

That's boots on the ground, a few boots on a small portion of coastal ground to carry

out a specific targeted operation over the next days and weeks.

And then they leave, that doesn't seem to meet the criterion of the sort of boots on

the ground opposition that a lot of people say they had.

All right, let's roll on out of here and hand things over to my Gallagher next.

So Eric Clapton had been a big deal for a long time, Laila Derrick and the Dominoes,

hello, cream, and then solo career.

It started in 1970.

After he'd been at that for 20 some years, the folks at MTV invited him over to do one

of those unplugged sessions.

And it was the acoustic version of Laila that captivated everybody, obviously tears in

heaven about the death of his son, various other things from his library.

One of my favorites was always Lonely Stringer.

From Eric Clapton Unplugged 1992, he is 81 today.

So let's let Old Slow Hand take us out.

For Jimmy Curse, you filled in for Ronda today, she's back tomorrow.

Thank you, Mr. Matt, for the technical guru skills, thank you, Nikki Waley for news excellence.

I'll see you tomorrow morning and Wednesday 5 a.m., hall, sun.

Pulling in for the departing Cristigal who's off running for Congress, it's kind of filling

by committee.

My day tomorrow and Wednesday.

See it five will go all the way to 10 right here on 6.60 a.m.

The answer might go to the next.

God bless our country, our troops, our families, be good.

The Internet is an amazing but risky place.

Hey, Mark Davis for Incogni, I N C O G N I in Cogni.com.

Look it out for your privacy, reducing spam calls, junk email, giving you peace of mind.

It's easy.

Sign up at incogni.com.

These search the web to find you in databases and people search sites.

Then they go to bat for you to remove your personal information.

You can track progress through your dashboard.

They'll give you personal privacy reports.

So much of our lives are online with our information just out there.

Take control.

It's too easy for the world to get your personal information.

Not just addresses and phone numbers, but purchase histories.

Even your political beliefs to target you for nuisance ads and even cybercrime.

With the custom removal feature, your dedicated privacy expert can take down almost everything

about you online.

So be smart in your online world.

Get protected with Incogni.

I N C O G N I in Cogni.com, 60% discount on a family plan with the promo code, Mark Davis.

So get protected today in Cogni, I N C O G N I in Cogni.com.