News Overload! Immigrants, arms, and incompetence

Music

Helping to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, this is the

Constitution Study on the America Out Loud Network with your host Paul Engel.

There's no one unifying theme for today's episode. Instead, I have three

different themes, one for each segment. Immigrants, arms and incompetence. Hello

there everyday Americans, Paul Engel here with the Constitution Study, where we

read and study the Constitution, teach Ryzen Generation Me free. Glad you could

join me today. Again, this is three topics that I found and I just thought well

let's take some time for each one. We're going to start with immigrants. In the

latest news, the niece and grand niece of the now deceased Islamic Revolutionary

Guard Major General Kassam Salamani were arrested by federal agents after

Secretary of State Marco Rubio terminated their green card, their legal lawful

permanent resident status. That may sound like a big deal, but there's what led to

this is really rather interesting. So while living in the United States, this

niece of the Salamani promoted the Iranian regime propaganda,

celebrated attacks against America, soldiers and military facilities in the

Middle East, grades the new Iranian, Iranian and Supreme Leader, denounced America as a

great Satan, and voice your unflinching support for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, a

designated terror organization. Now, okay, we do have freedom of speech in this

country, but if you're a visitor here, do you get to put out such denigrating

information? But wait, there's more. Now reported in at least all those be is the

fact that this grand niece of the general of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, she

entered the country in 2015, claiming she knew a political asylum. She claimed

that she was she feared for her life and that of her daughter, even though she was

the again, remember the niece and grand niece of the the leader of the

Revolutionary Guard, the general and so on. So was she really afraid for her life or was she

just trying to get her and her daughter into the United States? Now she applied for a

asylum in she came in on a tourist visa in 2015, claimed asylum was granted a

asylum in 2019 and then became a green card holder in 2021. Then in July of last

year, 2025, she followed an application to become a U.S. citizen and during

which she disclosed, this closed the fact that she had traveled to Iran at least four

times since she received her green card in 2019. Now this pretty much shows that her

claim of asylum were fraudulent. I mean, let's face it, if you're afraid to go back to

the country of your nationality because you're afraid you're going to get killed, you don't

voluntarily go back to the country of your of your citizenship because you're afraid

you're going to get killed. So the fact that she went back shows that this was a fraudulent

claim for asylum, which of course was never properly investigated. I mean, why would

we expect that to be investigated, especially by the Biden administration, which is more

than happy to have illegal immigrants, including people of of terrorists, just countries and

to this. Yeah, sure, no problem whatsoever. But there's a bit more. So she applied for

citizenship, right? But part of these citizenship application, when you take your oath of allegiance,

you force where any allegiance to another country, but her very words and statements show

that she would did not first wear her allegiance to the Islamic Republic. She promoted both

the regime and its propaganda. She same she wants to join the United States, but she celebrates

attacks against our soldiers and military facilities in the Middle East. She praised

the Supreme Leader. She calls this nation the great Satan, but she wants to become a citizen

or does it, but why then question is why does she want to become a citizen? Javersley is

not alleging herself to the United States. She's not force wearing any other allegiance

to another nation, which means I would say that her citizenship application is fraudulent.

And then people wonder why we're concerned about illegal aliens. This is a granted. It's

a bit of an extreme example, but it's example of the dangers of this lacks immigration policy

that has been part of this country for decades. By the way, this is not all Biden's fault.

This has been going on for decades. She and her and her knee and her daughter, the niece

and grandees, they were never properly vetted. They came around a tourist visa. Hey, you want

to come as a tourist? Come here. Do your tourism go home? She overstayed her tourist

being by quite requesting asylum. That never should have been granted. What is your credible

fear of retribution if you if you're more than one go back? She gets her green card and

she goes back. So that means her son was requested was obviously fraudulent. And now the big

thing. Oh, you mean Secretary State took away her green card? Yes. Her daughter's green

card? Yes. Because these were fraudulent claims. And her desire for citizenship apparently

was also fraudulent. Because either she was not she doesn't appear to be aligned with

the United States. And she doesn't appear to have been to force one religious to Iran.

But that's not the only example of craziness with aliens with immigration. You see two legal

aliens in Fairfax County, Virginia, but guilty to murder. And we're now I have gotten

a sweetheart plea deal. Now the Fairfax County Commonwealth's attorney, a Steve discano,

a plier's to be playing politics with this. You see the this is a site, Virginia's a sanctuary

state. And apparently he just loves giving deals to aliens. You see the first day I do

a jello. I believe his name accused of murder suspected of murder. He's an illegal

alien. So he broke a lot again to the country. He has a long criminal history. And he was

free on some sort of release at the time of the murder yet discatos office ignored all

of those warnings to give him a sweetheart deal. Now these two gentlemen could have been

convicted and sentenced if they were convicted in trial. Could have faced up to 40 years

in prison. What did they get as a deal? Five years with parole after three years. You have

a person with a long criminal history accused of murder facing again 40 years in jail.

He minimum 25 years in jail. And he's going to get out in three because the Commonwealth

attorney spun him a deal. When you're talking about sanctuary cities, in this case a sanctuary

state. I don't think that's what most people think of, but that's apparently what's going

on in Virginia. In fact, discanoes website, even declared that it's a perversion of justice

if a criminal who is an illegal alien is deported, but a criminal who's a US citizen gets

to stay in the country. I'm sorry, there is a distinction between a criminal that's an illegal

alien. You committed a crime to enter the country. You are eligible for deportation. If

you're a citizen, where the heck they're going to deport you to? This is your country.

The United States is not going to deport someone to the United States. But this again, this

is the insanity we see from some of the, so much of these sanctuary cities, literally

elevating people who broke the law to enter this country above citizens of the United States.

Now is this okay? Do you live in Virginia? Is this what you signed up for? Did you vote

for for Mr. Discano to hold the Fairfax County attorney, Commonwealth attorney? Did you

vote for it? If not, let me ask you. Would you vote for him again? Is he up for election

this year? Are you going to let people know that this is his idea of justice, giving alleged

murderers, sweetheart deals, you know, said 25 years in jail, up to 40 years in jail? No,

would just give you five and we'll let you out in three. Is this justice for the families

of the victims? Because this doesn't seem to be justice to me. Now, maybe I'm wrong.

Maybe there are other circumstances I'm not aware of, but based on whatever it's so far,

this seems more about the Commonwealth attorney trying to make national news by going soft

on the legal aliens, rather than, you know, actually doing his job of seeking justice

for the people of Fairfax County for upholding the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia

and Fairfax County for fulfilling his oath to support the Constitution, the both of the

Commonwealth of Virginia and the United States. Do you really want a chief prosecutor,

which is what the Commonwealth attorney is? Do you want that that's more interested in

politics than the law? That's more interested in making headlines than justice for the victims

because that's what it looks like. Now, I'm wondering in Mr. Discano's history,

has he offered similar deals to alleged murderers who were citizens of the United States,

or is it only the illegal aliens that get such a deal? Remember, the murder that was one of

these was accused of murdering somebody, stabbing them to death, stabbing their victim to death

on a bus, and this is how I did justice. See, this is why our confusion about immigration is so

damaging. Now, again, I have, I do have issues with federal immigration law, mainly the fact that

the Constitution doesn't delegate to the United States the power to regulate immigration.

They don't control, they, Congress can make laws about naturalization, not immigration. Those

are two separate things. And when you look at the fact that, well, the federal government has been,

well, I almost go criminally corrupt, but they've certainly been, they've certainly failed when

it comes to immigration. Now, should immigration be a nationwide policy, not a statewide policy?

I believe there's arguments for that. But the problem is we haven't had those discussions,

we haven't had those arguments, that idea has not been presented to the states for ratification.

That means the law says the 10th amendment of power not delegating the United States is

reserved to the states. That means immigration is a state power. Now, that means if states want to be

this stupid, they have a right to the people of the state, if the people of the state,

or the Commonwealth of Virginia want to let anybody into their state, that's fine.

They have no need to be recognized outside of that state because that's a state issue.

One of the problems we have is the people misunderstanding the recognizing of other state legal

actions. If Virginia wants to allow people to come to the states, their rules for entering the state,

well, then when that person comes in to say Tennessee, Tennessee has its own rules.

And they may say, well, listen, you have to, did you enter legally? There needs to be some,

that's why I think that confusion means this probably should be set to national level. But

for that to legally happen, we have to have a constitutional amendment, which is very important

because we can set the limits and the boundaries upon which the government can regulate immigration.

It allows us to put that fence, that limited numerator power fence around the federal government

and its actions when it comes to immigration. The more more interested in spending time

playing politics with these questions of sanctuary cities and states,

they say we're not going to bother with the law. We'll just let anybody come in and then complain

and ask the federal government for help when they have problems. And whether it's, hey,

you let these people in, they didn't really vet them properly. You're pushing them through

towards citizenship, but you never actually saw that were these people eligible.

And then at the state level, hey, we're going to give sweet hard deals. You're in legal alien.

Wouldn't you? I want the people of Virginia, especially of Fairfax County, Virginia,

to go down to this gentleman's office, to Mr. Discano's office,

explain to me why you're giving such a sweet hard deal to such criminals.

They committed a crime, a federal crime by entering the country.

They're accused of crime of murder. Why would you give them a sweet hard deal? Oh, well,

I don't know. Maybe it's because they don't think they've got a great chance. I don't know what

the answer is. But this gentleman, this Steve Discano needs to be confronted by the citizens he

represents and explain to them why he offered such a sweet hard deal to these

augmented alleged murderers. But apparently, in one case, convicted illegal alien.

Now, I have to hang out a second because I do have a break coming up. Then I'll pick up my

second topic of the day, which is arms. Now, before I go, you know, I saw this interesting report

that claims that up to 85% of the nutrients, our body needs that we used to get from our food,

doesn't come from our food anymore. It's literally been farmed out of the soil,

so it's not in our fruits and vegetables. Now, a lot of people look at this and say,

well, then, you know, we'll just take a lot of supplements. I know a lot of people they don't like

taking handful pills. So what can be done? Well, a friend as a chemical-free body,

they've come up with a great solution. It's called green 85. It's designed to give your body

the 85% of nutrients we used to get from our food in a simple juice powder.

It gives you energy. It helps you your digestion and immunity. It does all sorts of great things.

And again, it's simple. It's a juice powder. You put a scoop in water,

first thing in the morning, and you're getting the vitamins and minerals your body used to get

from their food by, again, eating good food, just putting it in that little powder.

Now, give it a try. Go to americatloud.shop and we'll click on the green 85 panel.

It's simple. It's easy, but I want you to be an informed consumer. Look at what's included.

What's in it? Read the directions. Watch the testimonials. Make sure this is something

you're willing to try. When you do, guess what? Use a code out loud to check out. You'll get 20% off

of your order. So give your body the nutrients and deeds in a simple 22nd practice every day

and get 20% off by using the code out loud at checkout. Because think about it. You wouldn't run

your car on 15% gasoline. You want to run it on gasoline or that's all. You want to run it on

real fuel. Why would you want your body to do the same thing? Get go to americatloud.shop and

check out green 85 today, the organic energy juice that gives your body the nutrients it needs

without the pills and without the crazy diets and enjoy your life fully fueled starting today.

Hey, we're calling all patriots to Nashville, Tennessee, July 2nd, 3rd and 4th for a powerful

celebration of faith, freedom and the American spirit. America out loud, the wellness company

and clear, invite you to join us for the 250-10 Nashville event. You'll experience best in class

speakers, extraordinary voices from across America, bring in inspire messages you won't forget

and on July 4th, get ready for the most spectacular fireworks show in the country. Lighten up the

Nashville sky, 250 years of liberty in America and 10 years of America out loud news, stand

and strong for true justice and the nation we all love. You can save now with early bird

pricing at americaoutloud.news forward slash Nashville July 2nd, 3rd and 4th. America out loud news

250-10 Nashville. Successful weight loss is about changing the gut-brain relationship with food.

I'm Dr. Kelly Victory with the wellness company. If you don't like needles, you'll love

oral dissolving to zepatide RX works by targeting the GOP1 and GIP receptors that influence appetite

and metabolism and unlike injections, these are fast absorbing sublingual tablets placed under

the tongue paired with an energy boost of B6 and B12. Visit TWC.Health slash out loud and use

code out loud for an exclusive discount. Struggling with your health, energy and constantly

feeling hungry? Want to save money on the rising cost of groceries and dramatically improve your

health? Go to chemicalfreebody.com forward slash out loud today, get nature's super multivitamin

doctor formulated green 85 juice formula, empower your immune system, cut your grocery bill and save

20% on your first order. Welcome back every day in america and jubilee join the constitution

study and today again we're looking at immigrants autos and in confidence. We did immigrants

in the first segment so this is the segment on arms and we're actually going to head out to the

US Attorney's Office for the district of Columbia and the US Attorney Janine Piro.

Now she is asking the DC Court of Appeals to conduct an on-bond hearing because she didn't like the

the decision of a three-dutch panel. The district of the three-dutch panel of the court said that

DC's ban on quote unquote large capacity magazines is unconstitutional. In other words they actually

looked at the language of the second amendment and said it says the right of the people to keep

in bear arms shall not be in French unless it's a big scary magazine or some other thing that

you know people made up later in the day. That means the US Attorney for the district of Columbia

is the same anti-gun attorney that we see from all these anti-gun groups even from anti-gun

attorneys general that we've seen in the past that we see in states all across the nation.

She defended the district's gun registration requirements arguing that the panel's decision could

put an end to prosecutions for possessing an unregistered firearm or carrying without a license.

Yes! In other words the second amendment means exactly what it says. The supreme law of the land

supersedes a district regulation which by the way is not law. Remember the Constitution says

that the Congress has the power to make laws for the district of Columbia. Article 1, Section 8

clause I think a 16 says to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over

such district not exceeding 10 mile square as made by the session of particular states and

acceptance of Congress become the seat of the government of the United States. Congress has

exclusive legislative power over the district of Columbia. So these rules and regulations

that unless they're classified they're not laws and if Congress did pass this law

without law would have been made not pursuant to the Constitution and as we all know under

Article 6 clause 2 this Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made

in pursuance thereof and all treaties made under the authority of the United States shall be

the supreme law of the land. So yeah Miss Piro this is really about following the Constitution.

You mean we won't be able to prosecute people for having an unregistered firearm? Yes!

For carrying without a license? Yes! Why? Because the Constitution says it's all right. You don't

need the government's permission to own a firearm. You don't need the government's permission to carry

a firearm. Mr. President, you recently fired your attorney general. I suggest you fire the US

attorney for the district of Columbia because he's apparently not willing to fill her oath to support

the Constitution of the United States. Now the plaintiff in this case of Benson versus the United

States filed their own counter-motion claiming that Appellan Tyrian Benson through council respectfully

moves to strike the United States response to the district of Columbia petition to

rehearing on Bach. The response is actually a petition for a rehearing on Bach and therefore

untimely under D.C. regulations. In the alternative, if this court excuses the untimeliness of

the United States request for rehearing on Bach, it should afford appellant an opportunity to

respond to the United States pleading which was filed on the same day as the appellant response

that the district's petition was due and makes arguments that this did not make in his position.

In other words, listen, they didn't do it on time so you shouldn't listen to it. If you're going to

excuse their tardiness, well, you have to give us an opportunity to respond because they filed in

such a way that we didn't get an opportunity to respond to many of their, including their claims

that we made that we they claim we made that we did not make. But yes, even in the federal district

of Columbia, we have a US attorney who won't rather like the county Commonwealth attorney

in Fairfax, Virginia. Apparently, he's not worried about the law, the Constitution, any of those

things. Oh my god, we'd have to actually we'd end prosecutions that would violate the Constitution

of the United States. How dare you say that we do that? Yeah. Meanwhile, in the fifth circuit court

of appeals, they're taking a look at the Federal Switchblade Act. Did you know there's a federal

switchblade back? I want to remind you that the Second Amendment says the right of the people to

keep in bear arms. We tend to focus on firearms, but it's not just firearms. It is other arms,

which Webster's 1820 dictionary 1828 dictionary defines as weapons of offense and armor for

defense of the body. And so it's a weapon. Now, part of this Federal Switchblade Act prohibits

the possession of Switchblade knives on federal lands such as national parks, land managed by the

Bureau of Land Management and defined Indian country. Now, this was heard by a three judge panel

of the fifth circuit. And according to reports, it seems they were originally skeptical of the

relief sought by knife rights, a group of gun rights. These are people looking for knife

rights. They they question the attorney very heavily on the his application to the challenge.

They even questioned, you know, how much of a threat is this to to the plaintiff or to the public

at large? But as much as Schumacher pointed out, this because you're on the one important aspect

of this is that the government doesn't doesn't disavow enforcement. This is not a statute that's

never been enforced and has gone into, you know, disuse. I mean, they enforce it when they want to

enforce it from time to time. They enforce it. They enforce it against a spider cop. I have no idea

who this spider co is. Now, as I said, it seemed like the the court may be leaning against knife

rights, but they did say that they're traded a great job and we'll have to wait and see

how the court actually decides the case. But again, when we're talking about violations of the

First Amendment, we are not only talking about firearms. We're not only talking about

magazines. We're not only talking about prohibitions, you know, prohibitions against the right to

keeping their arms not based in due process, meaning if someone's adjudicated a felon that would

make, especially a violent felon, yes, that would make it that would make sense. But simply saying,

no, you can't because the government says so is a direct violation of the Second Amendment,

the Supreme Law Land, saying that, you know, you're not allowed to have a magazine, which is part

of the arm is part of the firearm, a violation of the Second Amendment. And we'll have to wait

to see what DC circuit court says. And then when it comes to the knives, again, for those you may

not be familiar, you know, people carry knives for a lot of reasons, one of which is knives don't

jam. They generally don't, I don't know about a switchblade, I've never played much with switch

blades. But guess what? You know, a firearm can jam. Sometimes you need something else. And people

are saying, yes, this is this is my self defense weapon. It's my self defense arm. Just the same

as this firearm is, it is an arm as defined by a common language in the time of the adoption of

the Bill of Rights. It's an arm. Why does it not get the same protection? Because the

Second Amendment doesn't have an accept clause. The Fifth Amendment has an accept clause, meaning

you can be deprived of the property you have in your rights via due process of law, that process

to protect your rights in general. But it's not in the Second Amendment. So you can't make an

exception because of the sides of the magazine or the fact that you may not like that you have a

really bad image of switch blades, the law is the law. And if you want to do it, if you want to

change it, you actually have to change the law. You can't just make stuff up as you go along.

But this one, again, this one comes out in New York City. And this one, I loved the title.

It comes from bearing arms. And it says, turns out, ignorance of law is an excuse, at least if

you're NYPD. Now again, New York prosecutors routinely charge and put people in prison for

simply carrying a firearm without a New York concealed carry permit. By the way, it is difficult

to get. I used to live in New York State. It's difficult to get a concealed carry permit. When I

got mine back up in New York City, I had to pay, I think it was $10 to buy an application. Yes,

to buy an application. I had to go through, basically, a modified 100 safety course, or it was

basically, it was basically a gun safety course where they talked a bit about handgun laws in New

York State. And I had to, I had to provide three character references that lived in the same

county as me, but we're not related to me by blood or marriage. And I had to write self-adressed

stamped envelopes so they could send them a questionnaire to see if I was a good character or not.

And then I had to wait. It was like almost nine months before I got a letter that said, okay,

we've approved your license. If I could give you your license, you've approved it. You can now go

buy a gun where you can't actually buy the gun. You can pay for the gun and then come back to the

court to make sure that the judge approves of you buying that gun. And oh, by the way, all of that

was not valid in New York City. All right. Even though it might state concealed carry said it

everywhere except New York City. So here's an interest. We have a lawsuit by a Rafiq Khan,

an Army veteran and legal gun owner who possessed both a premises permit and a concealed carry

license. Meaning in New York City, you need a permit to have a gun on your premises. You also need

a permit to a separate concealed carry license to carry that weapon in public.

Now, Mr. Khan was out celebrating his mother's 70th birthday with family. Congratulations, Mr.

Khan's mom. But he realized that they were going to be in what New York law calls a sensitive

place. So what did he do? Well, he did what all law-biting gun owners and he went back to store

his firearm in his car. Now, according to reports from the judge's opinion, he says,

at some point, the police intelligence division was tipped off that someone matching plaintiff's

description was in possession of a firearm, tried to enter the eatery and then put the firearm

in the glove box of a blue BMW shortly thereafter. Officer Hughes was briefed on the situation

and left with officers Benson and Nicholson to investigate. The officers located the blue BMW

ran the license plate and determined that the car belonged to the plaintiff. The officers then

searched plaintiff's name through the various databases and learned that the plaintiff had a

business carry firearm license. Now, that phrase business carry license comes to the fact that in

New York State, especially at the time, you had to show just cause. In other words, it wasn't

assumed you were going to carry a gun because you could. You had to have a really good reason for

especially in New York City and one of them was while I need to carry it for my business.

Apparently, that's how he got it. But again, they noticed that term was changed,

concealed carry, but they knew he was licensed to carry. They searched the police database,

it was licensed to carry going back to the opinion. Apparently, none of the officers on the scene

knew what a business carry firearm license was. After turning to the internet, the officers had

even less clarity. Even so, the officers continued watching and eventually saw plaintiff and two

others leave the eatery and sit in the blue BMW for about half an hour. After plaintiffs began to

drive away, the officers initiated a traffic stop. Now, even though Mr. Khan immediately and

proactively informed the officers that he had a pistol in his glove box, he was still arrested

for supposedly criminal possession of a weapon, even though he had a license to carry that weapon.

And if it's still the same way as it was when I had a New York State, his license specifically

listed that weapon by make modeling serial number on his license. Mr. Khan spent the night in jail

and was arraigned the next day. And it was after his arrangement that the New York police licensing

division started investigating Khan's arrest. But rather than informing the officers and the court

that they had charged a guy with a valid carry permit for carrying without a permit,

they ordered that Mr. Khan surrender his license and all of his firearms simply because he was

illegally arrested for illegally possession of gun that he had both license and permission to carry.

But you got to hear this one is that the officers independently corroborated every piece of

information that the informant gave except the location of the firearms of the vehicle,

which is not what he was charged with. The judge said that sufficient a stab to establish probable

cause to believe the uncorroborated information i.e. that the plaintiff stored his firearm in his

glove box. It's apparently is a violation of some New York penal code. So let me ask you you live

in if you live in New York, you have a license, you follow everything, but you didn't store a property

they don't charge you they never charged him for sorry, they charged him for being carrying a weapon

being possession of a gun without a license. When he had a license, they had proved he had a license

and when they couldn't know what the term business license meant, rather than toggling the

supervisor, they googled it. Talk about ignorance of the law. And it was Mr. Khan that paid the price.

I don't know about you, but I would love to see Mr. Khan not only sue the NYPD,

I'd like to see criminal charges because if you have again remember these officers,

they looked at the license plate, they found his name, they found out he had a license to carry a

firearm, they didn't understand the particular type of license, but they didn't bother to verify that.

Where is and what do you hang qualified immunity? You have a person licensed to carry a firearm

that is in possession of a firearm and you're going to that is false arrest ladies and gentlemen.

I mean, what's next? They see him driving down the road. He produces a driver's license,

but they don't like the driver's license because it says it's some drivers' card,

so they arrest him for it, could drive him out of the license. This is the craziness it comes on.

And it's one of the reasons why qualified immunity and the idea that the police are always right

is not only stupid, but it's incredibly dangerous.

Okay, I got one more segment to come before I go, you know, I talk about these places a lot,

you know, I quoted from Beringon, say there's a news outlet that covers second amendment issues,

but there are a lot of organizations that are trying to deprive you of your rights,

not just the NYPD. See, I want to support companies and supporting organizations that are

protecting our rights. One of them is Patriot Mobile, America's only Christian and served

as a wireless provider. I joined them a few years ago, not because of their 4G and 5G coverage,

not because they're 100% customer based, a US based customer support, not even because they're

a Christian and served as a wireless provider. They take a portion of every dollar to support organizations

that are defending our rights. First Liberty, turning point USA, and yes, now the Constitution's

studying. So now is the time. Don't just vote in the ballot booth, vote with your cell phone,

stand together and support organizations like the Constitution study that are fighting for your

rights. Go to patreonmobile.com slash Constitution, find a plan that works for you, and uh,

hey, see if you're eligible for a discount. When you sign up every time you pay your cell phone bill,

portion that will come here to the Constitution study to support the work that we're doing here.

Get great cell phone coverage at an excellent price and support your rights and freedoms in the

United States by going to patreonmobile.com slash Constitution and signing up today. I also hope

you'll head over to americatloud.news for your news and information. I go there every day. Why?

Because corporate media has been lying to us for decades. I need sources of news that I can trust

and verify. One of those is americatloud.news. So join me, go there, read the stories and the articles,

then share them. Listen to the podcast, watch the video, share them. It's the act of sharing it,

the act of letting people know the news, that the meat, the corporate media doesn't want them to know,

that will help secure their blessings of liberty for all of us.

I cannot tell a lie, my sinuses are blocked. George, you crossed the Delaware. You can cross

congestion here. Try clear. Freedom smells like victory. Come celebrate 250 years of American

independence at the america out loud, 250-10 Independence Day celebration in Nashville,

on July 2nd through 4th. Go to america250-nashville.com. Use code XLEAR for 20% off admission.

Clear. Breathe in the independence. Are you looking for a healthy snacks, but you've had enough

of all the sweet sugary energy bars? Good news. There's new bars to try. That savory crunchy

impact with goodness. Bear bars are based just on six simple natural ingredients, a certified organic

veggie nut and seed bar. That's low temp dried. Never baked or fried. Bear bars are plant-based,

gluten-free and loaded with nutrients and protein. Head over to bearbar.com slash out loud

and get the exclusive discount just for America out loud listeners. That's B-E-A-R-B-A-R.com

forward slash out loud. I'm Doug Evans, author of The Sprout Book, and I've devoted my life to helping

people reconnect with food at its most alive stage, The Sprout. When you germinate a seed,

you're not just growing food. You're activating potential. Sprouts grow without soil,

sunshine or fertilizer right on your kitchen countertop. They're organic, fresh, and cost less than

a dollar of serving. It's nature's fastest form of farming accessible to anyone, anywhere. Discover

the joy of growing your own food and the power of living nutrition. Visit TheSproutingCumby.com

and use the code out loud for an exclusive offer. Your heart is crucial. Are you supporting it as

you age? Try the wellness company's healthy heart formula with touring, Dribose, and co-enzyme Q10.

Designed by Dr. Peter McCullough, healthy heart helps boost heart function and support

Cardiac Strength. Get 20% off your first order plus free shipping at twc.health forward slash

out loud with code out loud. Welcome back, Everyday Americans. You've rejoined the constitution

study. We talked about immigrants. We talked about arms. Now let's talk about incompetence.

And other stories. I don't know if this is simply incompetence. So the Obama Presidential Center

is getting ready to open. I guess they're opening this summer. And they have a great deal.

See, if you live in Illinois, you get free admission on Tuesdays, at least according to ABC 7 in Chicago.

So rather than paying to $30 for adults and $23 for 12 and older, you get in free just because

you're a resident of Illinois. But you actually have to have proof of Illinois residents to get that

free admission. I actually laugh at this because isn't this the same group that is fighting tooth

and nail against the Save Act? The one constitutional aspect of that act is Congress saying, listen to vote

in elections for House or Senate, you must provide a valid photo ID.

Now, Gordon, apparently not again, the Obama Presidential Center, it's a private organization.

They have every right to demand ID. They have every right to set the pricing, however they want.

They have every right to say, if you want special pricing for resident pricing, you have to show

your resident. I'm not saying anything they're doing is wrong. I just find it humorous, shall we say?

An example of their ridiculous positions that say, you know, you have to prove who you are

to get free entrance into the presidential center, into the museum, but not to vote.

To me, that's just, you know, I mean, that's just kind of the way it's, there's nothing wrong with

what the presidential center is doing. Nothing whatsoever. I just find it an example of the

okay, for me, but not for the mentality when it comes to things like, oh, proof of who you are,

an ID showing an ID. It's a constitutional infringement to require an ID to vote,

but not to gain access to a museum. And that's just another example of the crazy nonsense

that's been going on. Okay, let's get back to New York City for a minute.

So New York City has a, what they call New York City Housing Authority. It is, well,

they run their landlords, right? And I will tell you, I don't know if it was a housing authority

time. When I was a small child, we lived in the project. We lived in the housing authorities

or partners. And well, let's just say people are starting to question how good, I mean, they're

not exactly known for being good landlords. The average way time for a non-emergency repair

in a New York City Housing Authority apartment is around 449 days. Meaning, if there's a problem

in your apartment that is not considered an emergency, you got to wait about a year and a quarter

for anybody shows up to do with the problem. At the same time, this agency has at least 74

executives that get paid $200,000 or more a year. And 104 member of their upper management that

gets $140,000 year, meaning there's $22 million between the executives and the upper management.

For an agency that, guess what, can't get a refrigerator repaired or an air conditioning

repaired or something like that in under a year and a quarter. The CEO of the NYCHA, Lisa Bova Hyatt,

she pulls down just under $400,000, $399,999 a year, 400 grand.

For an agency that can't get, can't even do basically, put it this way, if it was a private

apartment building, I bet you the New York City would be all over them if it took a year and a

quarter to get basic maintenance done. And oh, by the way, the VP for legal affairs at the NYCHA,

the David Road, he makes over $300,000 a year. It seems to be a great paying job to

be an executive at an incompetent city agency. Now, New York City has an interesting

history with slumlords. The slumlords of those, you know, they collect the rent, but they don't

do the work. And we have this image, this picture, right, of overcrowded, rundown buildings that,

you know, not maintained. And, you know, again, people, you know, yeah, there's a problem in

the apartment. There's a problem with the plumbing, a problem with the appliances and, you know,

the slumlord ignores them. That kind of sounds like it describes the New York City housing authority

at this point, get their executives are pulling down big, big bucks. And by the way, those bucks

are your taxpayer dollars if you live in New York City. According to one actress, they turn

public housing into a new hustle with residents and afterthought rather than saying, let, let me not

take a raise so the money can go back and fix in the infrastructure. They're living, well, they,

so that they live living conditions have basic dignity. In other words, hey, we're not worried.

Let them let them deal with their problems. I get my paycheck. They're getting raises while

they're incompetent. But then again, this is a city authority, meaning it's run by the city of

New York, which means, hey, Mr. Rondani, why are executives at this agency where they can't give

basic housing? You're always talking about basing housing. You're talking about lowering the rent.

You're talking about all these things. How about your own housing authority actually maintain

the buildings and apartments that they own already? How about you cut some of these executive

salaries in the house and use that money to fix the apartments that the people actually paid to

live in? If you're waiting for that, don't hold your breath. Okay, one more here. And this is

a little different. So stay farm insurance. And this is something I want to warn you about because

you may be worried about this. They have come to an agreement to renew the insurance of

a Santa and a homeowner after the state state farm used drones to spy on her house.

Now, this lady, a Linda Bennett received a letter from state farm warning her that her

homeowner's policy would be canceled unless she replaced her roof, something estimated

costing $20,000 and $50,000. Of course, she looks like I don't have that kind of money.

But here's where the dispute came from. You see, more and more insurers are using drones,

aerial photography. And in some cases, artificial intelligence to evaluate properties.

And this is how Ms. Bennett suspects her roof came under scrutiny.

She said, when I got the notice, I thought to myself, nobody came out. Nobody in calls and said,

we need to inspect your roof for our policy. I just got that saying that I had to get a new roof.

I had no explanation. Now, apparently she knew that there was an inspection. She had a contractor

come out to assess it and said, well, the roof was still in pretty good shape. It needed some

minor repairs, but the roof as a whole was a good shape and probably had at least another nine or

10 years before it needed to be replaced. But it's interesting. Coming up, coming up, why

are these going on? Are they simply using, again, other sources to not actually inspect the

roof, but just get a glance at it. An advisor from the United Policy Holders,

and Amy Bach said, if you get one of these notices right back immediately or call, ask them,

am I being non-renewed on the basis of an aerial image? Then demand to see that image.

I want to have those pictures. I want a chance to fix what the problem is. But unless I know what

the problem is, I can't fix it, which brings an interesting question. Imagine, does the insurance

companies simply have drones flying around over the houses of the people they ensure to inspect

the homes? Because, again, aerial footage may say there might be a problem, but it's pretty hard

to say the extent of the problem just by an aerial footage, which brings me to another question.

And that is, wait a second, you performed a search on my home. Does my policy authorize you to

search my home without my permission? Well, it wasn't visible for the street. Do we actually have

companies that are simply gathering images on rooftops and whole neighborhoods and then selling

that data to the insurance companies? This, to me, comes on the heels of other reports about

people's driving habits being tracked by their cars. Nowadays, cars are rolling computers and

all sorts of features. And in some cases, the data collected about how you drive your car, how fast

you drive, how hard you accelerate, how hard you break, that's being sent to the car manufacturers,

which is selling it to the insurance companies without your permission. These are issues we have

to be concerned with because we've become so connected that we sometimes don't think about,

well, what are the downsides? What are the possible issues? I'm in the process of buying a car

from a family number. And the one of the first things I did was I searched online once I decided

that I want to buy the car and say, how do I turn off any data reporting? I don't want the

manufacturer to know how I drive. There's none of their business. I don't want them to know if they,

you know, if I'm getting my oil change when they when they think I should or if I'm following none

of there, they sold me the car. It is mine. They didn't rent it to me. They didn't lease it to me.

I am the sole and whole owner. I don't even have a loan going to be on this car. And to me,

this is another example of how often simply we don't think about what we hand over when we use

these services that are supposed to make our lives easier. Now, I remember I had a problem. We had

a windstorm out here that caused damage to my house. And I called the insurance company. They set

out an adjuster. The adjuster took a drone to make sure it was actually an overhead door that was

damaged. But at that point, he went out and inspected with the drone to make sure there was no

damage to the roof. So he could document and I said, okay, I understand that. I gave permission

for that. That's a lot different from him simply flying his drone over my house when I'm not home

because he's looking to see if there's a problem. And I think we need to be more aware of

not just how much data we make available to others. But how often that people may be gathering

data because they think they have access, but they may not legally have access. And that may be

something we need to know and be aware of. So there we go. Three topics today. I should

immigrants, arms and incompetence, a nice little mortgage mortgage board of events going on. We'll

have to see what else comes up because you know, again, not always there's something worth an entire

episode with a common theme. Maybe we'll have more of these. We'll have to see how the news goes.

There's certainly plenty of things going on in this world. And I hope you're engaged in them.

It's why when I set up the Constitution study, our focus is on diligently reading a study in

the Constitution, knowing when our teaching the rise in generation to be free, knowing when our

rights are violated and preparing to defend and serve them. That's why I'm here. Hopefully,

that's why you're here. And hopefully, that's why you'll continue to come back and join us here

for the Constitution study. Now, you may have questions. You may have questions about what I've

been talking about or other questions related. I love answering questions. I know I'm weird.

Most people don't like the public speaking. Most people don't like answering questions. I love both.

Now, questions are important because they do two things. Obviously, if you don't know, ask.

I only believe there are two stupid questions in the world. The one you don't ask, the one you

ask three times. If you don't know, ask. Go to constitution study.com slash questions and ask

your question. I ask for your name and email address because I'm going to email you an answer.

Me, myself, I, not an AI, not I'm going to answer your question. Now, if you'd like me to answer

the question on the radio, well, there's a checkbox. You know, please answer on America,

I'll talk radio. You do that. I'll answer on the radio. But as I said, the only two stupid

questions, the one you don't ask, the one you ask three times. If you don't know, ask. Not only

does it help you, they're actually helps me because every question is based on a premise.

And I have to double check to make sure my premise is valid. So when people ask questions,

I'm offering double checking myself to make sure I'm on the right point. But it also helps you

and also helps others because there are probably dozens of not hundreds of people out there listening

that have the same or similar question, but either didn't think to ask or maybe they were afraid to

ask. I mean, honest, I'm not that scary. I don't bite. I've had all my shots, old joke.

So please go to constitutionstudio.com slash questions and ask your question. I'd much rather have

you asked in the answer than have you wonder or to continue under a false premise because a lot of

the questions I get are based in a false premise and I can help prove with facts and evidence and

data and quotes and points you the right place to see, oh wait a second, you need to understand

this in order to properly answer that question. So it helps you and it's me and it's other listeners,

please do. I'd love to have more segments where I'm just answering questions, but sadly,

I'm not getting as much as I used to. So I'm looking forward to answering your questions.

Again, go to constitutionstudio.com slash questions and ask. I also hope you'll come back and join

us here for the constitution study. Now we're on America loud talk radio heard on the iHeartRadio

network every weekday at 4 p.m. Eastern time, which means you get to listen on the web on our apps

for Apple Android or Alexa or if your iHeartRadio station covers it, you can hear us on the air.

Because you can also listen via podcasts. Now podcasts are cool. I listen to a lot of podcasts.

Means you don't have to listen to 4 p.m. Eastern time, you can follow up later because

it does take a day or two for an episode to go from talk radio to podcast, but you get to listen

in your favorite podcast app. I ask you a favor though. Subscribe to the show to the podcast,

right? Leave us a rating on Apple podcast. It's important for the algorithm. See, the more

subscriptions we have, the more forced are in five star reviews we have. Well, the more likely

the algorithm is to share this when people are looking for podcasts. So listen to

so you can find all the links you need at the homepage at americaoutloud.news.

But please share those links. It's important because as much as the algorithm helps show the

constitution study, word of mouth is even better. That means when you share the link to the program,

you're not just sharing the constitution study. You're not just sharing America out loud talk

radio. You are helping to share the blessings of liberty to everyone who calls this great nation.